Coaching Pakistan team ‘not bed of roses’: Waqar Younis

Lahore, Mar.27 (ANI): Admitting that coaching the national squad ‘is not a bed of roses’, newly appointed Pakistan cricket coach, Waqar Younis, has said that he has left his ego back in Australia and is now ready to accept the challenge.

“Coaching is all about management. A coach needs to forget his ego – for being a great player of yesteryear. He should come to the level of his players and think the way they think. I have left my ego back in Australia because I believe that no coach is bigger than the game,” Waqar said in an interview with Deutsche Welle Urdu Service.

Waqar, who had settled in Sydney after retiring from professional cricket, said he would give his best and would try not to disappoint the fans, who have had few occasions to celebrate over their national squad’s success in the recent past.

“The history of Pakistan cricket tells us that the coaching of the national team is no an easy task. But someone had had to come forward and I accepted the challenge. I assure the nation and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) that I will not disappoint them,” he said.

Waqar, who arguably was one of best swing bowler of his times, said his priority would be to install discipline and confidence in the team, and urged people to refrain from criticising the team and the team management after every defeat.

“I understand that the people of Pakistan are mad for cricket and their sentiments are badly injured when the national team loses but I request them that they should curb their emotions and try to understand the circumstances before reacting,” he said.

Though Waqar’s first assignment is to help Pakistan defend its title in the upcoming ICC T20 World Championship in West Indies, but the newly appointed coach said his prime target is the 2011 World Cup.

“Yes, World Cup 2011 is the real target. I have seen immense talent in Pakistan A and U-19 teams which needs to be groomed and I am sure that in next few months things would start moving in the right direction,” he said.

Waqar said Pakistan has got players who are capable of lifting the T20 World Cup once again, and added that fitness plays a vital role in any major tournament.

“Pakistan are capable of defending their title in the presence of Shahid Afridi, Abdul Razzaq and Akmal brothers,” he said. (ANI)

Terrorists of today fathered by Pak were yesteryear ‘heroes’ prior to 9/11 : Zardari

London, Mar.10 (ANI): Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari, for the first time, has admitted that his country had fathered extremists, which were seen as ‘heroes’ by the people of the country.

“Let us be truthful to ourselves and make a candid admission of the realities. The terrorists of today were the heroes of yesteryears until 9/11 occurred and they began to haunt us as well,” Zardari told a meeting of former senior civil servants in Islamabad some days ago.

Zardari’s statement clearly suggests that he is concerned over the Islamic militants who have virtually declared war against the state striking in any part of the country at their will.

During an interview with The Daily Telegraph, recently, Zardari had acknowledged that the extremist groups were once considered “strategic assets” of the country, but stressed that they do not enjoy the same support now.

“I don”t think anybody in the establishment supports them any more. I think everybody has become more wise than this,” he said while confirmed that the Army was now targeting those it had previously used as proxies in attacks on India.

Though Islamabad has always denied its links with banned extremist organisations such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), these Islamic terror groups have long been regarded as Pakistan’s ‘proxy forces’.

The LeT is believed to have been created to fight with the Afghan Mujahideen against the former Soviet-backed Najibullah regime in Kabul and to attack Indian forces in Jammu and Kashmir. (ANI)

How can jihadis termed as heroes now be arch-enemies, asks Pak paper

Islamabad, July 10 (ANI): A leading Pakistani daily has asked how is it possible to rationally explain to the people of the country that militants who were termed as heroes of yesteryear by the state are the arch-enemies today.

Speaking about the root cause of Pakistan’s problems, President Asif Ali Zardari said that the military’s erstwhile ‘strategic assets’ were the ones against whom military operations were now required, The Dawn says.

And in a meeting with retired senior bureaucrats in Islamabad on Tuesday, Zardari again said that “militants and extremists had been deliberately created and nurtured as a policy to achieve some short-term tactical objectives.”

The paper asks Zardari that if the policy of creating militants was wrong earlier, then it is wrong now. It cannot be any other way.

It would be not possible to explain to Pakistani people that the heroes of yesteryear are the arch-enemies of today. The militants’ religious justifications remain the same; what’s changed is that the militants were fighting the state’s ‘enemies’ yesterday, but now have turned their guns on the state and its allies.

The paper asks should we have ever used jihadi proxies to fight the Russians in Afghanistan? Should we have ever supported the idea of armed jihad in Kashmir? Should we have ever sought to retain our influence in Afghanistan through the Taliban?

If any of those choices ever made sense, then we should have no complaints about the rise of Talibanisation in Pakistan because we created the climate and opportunity for them to run amok, it adds.

It further says that fault is of course not of Pakistan alone and the US obsession with the Soviet enemy, happily colluded in the creation of Muslim warriors.

Pakistan’s Middle Eastern and Gulf allies were happy to create a Sunni army to counter the ‘threat’ from post-revolution Shia Iran, but at the end of the day it was Pakistani soil on which they were primarily nurtured.

The jihadis were raised in our midst we should have always been wary of the extreme blowback we are now confronted with, the Dawn says. (ANI)

Madhur Bhandarkar to make Sobhraj film?

KATHMNADU: Will Madhur Bhandarkar, the man who exposed the murky side of the media in “Page Three” and the fashion industry in the Priyanka Chopra-starrer “Fashion”, now delve into the six-year-old saga of Charles Sobhraj, who is imprisoned in a dingy jail in Nepal?

The 66-year-old, who has been fighting a series of damaging verdicts in Nepal since his arrest from a Kathmandu casino in 2003, has been approached by a well-known Bollywood production company for a biopic to be made with his consent and cooperation. The company, whose name Sobhraj is loath to divulge till they reach a deal, has told him if he was interested, they would approach Madhur Bhandarkar to direct the film.

Gearing up to fight his murder conviction in Nepal’s Supreme Court once again after an appellate court dealt him a blow, Sobhraj has been told that he would have control over the script. It would be a god-send for the half Indian, half Vietnamese who could eventually hope to tell the world his side of the story.

While Nepal police have charged him with entering the country illegally in 1975 using a murdered Dutch tourist’s passport and then befriending and killing an American tourist, Connie Jo Bronzich, Sobhraj says he was framed by police who forged his signature and documents. When he challenged the 20-year life term slapped on him by Kathmandu’s district court, he received a setback recently with an appellate court finding him guilty of coming to Nepal illegally in 1975.

Despite the glitzy offer by Bollywood, Sobhraj is in two minds about the proposal. While he is tempted to tell his story, on the other hand, his lawyer in France and his business partners, with whom he ran a production company, Gentleman Films, in Paris, are against the idea.

This is the yesteryear’s criminal hero’s third brush with Bollywood. While director Prawaal Raman is planning a film, Charles and I, apparently based on Sobhraj’s life with Sanjay Dutt playing the lead, an earlier attempt by a production company fizzled out after Sobhraj fell out with the proposed script writer Farrukh Dhondy.

Official Washington prefer more-breezy, fly-in, fly-out casual partying events

Washington, Apr.30 (ANI): Socialising and partying in official Washington has undergone a change in the last decade and a half.

Washington doesn’t demand or even want a sit-down dinner with an evening port.

According to Politico, partygoers tend to prefer more-breezy, fly-in, fly-out casual events, like birthday parties for A-list reporters and staffers.

Faced with the most terrifying economic crisis since the Great Depression, two wars, the looming collapse of the auto industry, a swine flu epidemic and even a few pirate attacks, the city’s new establishment hasn’t had the time – or perhaps the inclination – to elect a new power hostess.

“The first 100 days, the economy wasn’t solved and the new hostess hasn’t been identified,” says journalist Margaret Carlson, who has a knack for bringing people together.

Its essentially par for the course that every incoming administration reshuffles the Washington deck – effectively determining who’s powerful and who’s not. But as any decent lobbyist will tell you, access is the key to power, and few control the access to the city’s political hierarchy more directly than the reigning social chair.

The doyennes of yesteryear — Democratic powerhouse Esther Coopersmith, the well-known Sally Quinn, and Beth Dozoretz, a friend of the Clintons, remain social fixtures. These women still host fabulous parties.

Several years ago, two new party players – Juleanna Glover and Nancy Jacobson Penn – popped up on the horizon, offering food, drink and expansive homes for White House officials, members of Congress, senators, Capitol Hill staff, lobbyists, reporters and even then-Vice President Dick Cheney.

Glover, a Republican, was more than willing to throw a party for anyone from the newly minted head of CNN’s Washington bureau to visiting A-listers such as businessman John Tisch.

Jacobson Penn, conveniently a Democrat, used her impressive Rolodex to transform her palatial Georgetown home into a sort of social foxhole for Democrats in a town that was run by Republicans.

Between them, Glover and Jacobson Penn had the social cartography of political Washington covered.

Still, the grandeur of a Katharine Graham soiree is missing – the utter sophistication and French chefs replaced by appetizers from Costco.

So who’s in line for the new throne?

Communications guru, avid party-thrower and overall Washington political scene expert Jim Courtovich says that “the list is still emerging.” (ANI)