Move more troops from Indian border to Afghanistan side, US tells Pak

Washington, June 28 (ANI): The United States has reiterated that Pakistan must move its troops stationed along the Indian border to the western Afghan border to focus more on the terror threat emanating from that area.

Addressing a Congressional hearing here, the Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, Robert O Blake said that Pakistan needed to move more troops from its border with India to the western parts of the country to fight terrorism.

Blake said that the United States would support talks between Indian and Pakistan to establish peace and stability in the region, but added that it would not interfere in the bilateral talks, and leave it to the two countries ‘to chart their own course of action.’

“India and Pakistan face common challenge and we will support continuing dialogue to find joint solutions to counter terrorism and to promote regional stability,” The Dawn quoted Blake, as saying.

Referring to the meeting of Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan Singh and Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari in Russia’s Yekaterinburg earlier this month, Blake said that such engagements were encouraging particularly after the heightened tension between both the countries in the wake of November 2008 Mumbai carnage.

“We will continue to support dialogue between Indian and Pakistani leaders. The timing, scope and content of any such dialogue are strictly matters for Pakistani and Indian leaders to decide,” Blake said.

The United States is pushing for the stalled bilateral talks between India and Pakistan to resume as soon as possible. It had even sent a special envoy, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, William Burns, to New Delhi with a letter for Dr.Manmohan Singh recently.

The contents of the letter were not disclosed, but media reports suggested that President Obama urged the Indian leadership to resume dialogue with Pakistan. (ANI)

India gets invite for Af-Pak meet to be held in Italy

New Delhi, June 24 (ANI) India along with other key global powers and regional players has been invited to the international meet on Afghanistan and Pakistan to be held in Italy’s Trieste city this week.

The meeting would be held on the sidelines of the G-8 Foreign Minister’s meeting. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns and Special envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan Richard Holbrooke would represent the US.

“We expect an open dialogue on the challenges that we face together in Afghanistan and Pakistan,” said one State Department official.

“If we all working together, I think there’s a significant amount of common interest in Pakistan in bolstering the Pakistani government and in providing more resources for its fight against the Taliban and other extremists, and for finding money,” he said.

The official noted that there is an enormous humanitarian challenge in Pakistan and the international community will need more resources to deal with that.

Iran, which has been also invited for the crucial Af-Pak meet by host Italy, has not yet responded.

Asked if the participating countries would be asked for both humanitarian and military aid with regard to Pakistan, the official said: “We will be looking for all of the ways in which countries will be able to help bolster the government and contribute towards these goals.” (ANI)

Indo-US nuclear deal plays out in slow motion

NEW DELHI: Although a nuclear deal between US and India is a wrap, the wheels are moving at a grinding slow pace on implementing the deal, with the US dithering on starting negotiations for the reprocessing agreement.

Government sources said civil nuclear issues occupied a large part of the discussions between William Burns and foreign secretary Shiv Shankar Menon on Wednesday. It’s likely they will come up for talks again when Burns meets NSA M K Narayanan on Thursday.

Negotiations for a reprocessing agreement is yet to start, because Washington, Indian officials said, was yet to set a date. India is insistent that a reprocessing deal is absolutely necessary for the nuclear deal to be meaningful. The deal said negotiations would start within six months of the signing of the agreement, but the US is yet to do so. The newly nominated US undersecretary of state for arms control, Ellen Tauscher, told the US Senate at her confirmation hearing that negotiations would start before August 2. In her hearing, she even promised that the entire process of implementing the deal would be completed a year from that date. Given the present pace, there is some scepticism here, and it’s not clear whether US tardiness is just bureaucratic or deliberate.

Indian public and private entities seeking to reap early harvests from the deal have complained that around a score of licenses for nuclear and conventional dual use technologies and equipment are hanging fire with the US administration. The nuclear deal transferred dual-use licensing from presumptions of denial to presumptions of approval — but from all accounts, the Obama administration is yet to approve. Sources here said it would help if a political statement of intent from the top levels of the US government were sent down the system.

Sanctions and bans remain on Indian entities by the US despite the deal, these haven’t yet been lifted.

Just as a sign of how long things can take between the two countries, a technology safeguards agreement (TSA) allowing India to launch spacecraft with US components is yet to be signed, though officials on both sides expected it to be signed on Thursday. This agreement has taken years of painful negotiations and has had to be delinked from a commercial space launch agreement (CSLA) which is still to be negotiated, but could be a boost for India’s civilian space sector.

US sources said India should quickly name sites for US reactors and make them public. India had, in a letter of intent by the foreign secretary, told the US that it would buy reactors with a minimum of 10,000 Mwe of new power generating capacity from US companies. This was given to the US on September 10, 2008. Whether the reprocessing negotiations should precede the naming of sites or vice-versa is not yet clear.

For its part, India needs to take steps to formalise the safeguards agreement with the IAEA by submitting a separation plan, as well as sign up to the CSC convention. The convention for supplementary compensation on nuclear damage has been agreed to by India and is necessary, say officials, to enable US firms to participate in the civil nuclear sector in India. International nuclear firms, led by US companies, have been lobbying hard for India to adopt the convention under the IAEA. The global treaty allocates legal responsibility with the installing state and company for compensating nuclear damage caused by a nuclear incident.

Burns carrying presidential letter for Indian govt

US Under Secretary of State William Burns, currently on a visit to New Delhi, is carrying a private presidential letter for the Indian government, with whom the Obama administration is looking forward to work with, a top official said here today. Terming India as “absolutely critical” in the region, US Special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke said: “India is a country that we must keep in the closest consultations with.

” “At midnight last, I spoke to Undersecretary of State Bill Burns immediately after he had landed in New Delhi,” Holbrooke said in his maiden press conference after occupying the current position five months ago. “He is carrying a presidential letter to the Indian government.

He is carrying the message that I would have carried if I would had time to go to New Delhi on this trip, but I couldn’t do it,” said Holbrooke, who early this week returned from a trip to Pakistan. Holbrooke, however, declined to divulge the content of the message, saying: “It is a private letter”.

“But the important thing is that the number three person in the Department of State has gone to India to reaffirm immediately after the election,” he said. “We consider India an absolutely critical country in the region.

They’re not part of the problem but they are vitally effective and we want to work closely with them,” he said.

Roche says Genentech’s Levinson to stay on board

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – Roche Holding AG (ROG.VX), which last month acquired Genentech Inc, said on Tuesday that Arthur Levinson, the biotech company’s chief executive, would stay on as chair of a new Genentech board.

Levinson will no longer be CEO, but will be charged with steering integration of the two companies, serve as a scientific adviser and be nominated to the Roche board, the Swiss company said in a statement.

Roche has appointed several of its own executives to top non-research positions at Genentech as of May 1, including Pascal Soriot as CEO.

Roche said Susan Desmond-Hellmann, president of product development at Genentech, will hand over her responsibilities by mid-year, after which she will also act as an adviser to the company and join the scientific advisory board.

During the eight-month-long takeover battle that ended in March, Roche had said it expected Genentech senior management to stay on, but some shareholders and analysts have surmised that the biotech company’s prolific scientists and top managers would view the acquisition as an opportunity to leave.

Roche said Richard Scheller, executive vice president of Genentech research, will lead an independent research and development group within Roche, which will report directly to Chief Executive Severin Schwan.

Roche also said that William Burns, CEO of the Roche pharmaceutical group, will retire next January 1 and will also be nominated to the company’s board.

In addition, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, currently executive vice president of Genentech research drug discovery, will succeed Scheller as head of research and be appointed as Genentech’s chief scientific officer.

On the commercial side, Roche said Soriot, currently responsible for operations of the pharmaceutical division at Roche, will be appointed as CEO of Genentech, where he will lead all pharma activities in the United States.

Ian Clark, head of commercial operations at Genentech, will take over as head of global marketing and chief marketing officer for Roche’s entire pharmaceutical division.

Pat Yang will continue as head of technical operations at Genentech, while Hal Barron, currently head of Genentech development and chief medical officer, will become head of global development for oncology, immunology/tissue growth repair and virology.

Roche said David Ebersman, Genentech’s chief financial officer, and Steve Juelsgaard, chief compliance officer, will be leaving the company.

(Reporting by Deena Beasley, editing by Matthew Lewis and Tim Dobbyn, Gary Hill)

Major powers look at new ways to coax Iran

Senior diplomats from six major powers meeting in London on Wednesday will discuss ways to entice Iran to give up sensitive nuclear work, a U.S. official and diplomats said on Tuesday.

Permanent U.N. Security Council members Britain, the United States, France, China, Russia as well as a senior official from Germany will mull a range of incentives to change Iran’s behavior and get the Iranians back to talks, according to a U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

“We are trying to bring Iran back to the (negotiating) table,” the U.S. official added. “It may be repackaging of old ideas but there are some ideas we may be able to present.”

A Western diplomat, who also asked not to be named, said additional sanctions also would likely be discussed although Russia and China have balked at further punitive measures against Iran.

The London meeting follows President Barack Obama’s talks with foreign leaders in Europe in which he shared early results from an ongoing U.S. policy review toward Iran.

Obama, said one diplomat, made clear he would break from the Bush administration’s isolation policy of Iran and that Washington wanted a full role in any future negotiations by the six major powers with Tehran on its nuclear program.

The hope is that full U.S. participation in such talks would encourage Iran to take them more seriously.

In a rare departure last year, the Bush administration’s point person on Iran — William Burns — sat in for the first time on a meeting with major powers to hear Iran’s response to an incentives package offered to give up its enrichment.

State Department spokesman Robert Wood said Burns, who Obama retained as undersecretary of state, would be at Wednesday’s meeting, but he declined to provide details of what the United States might suggest at those London talks.

“It’s obviously to chart the way forward in terms of dealing with Iran’s nuclear program,” Wood said. “I don’t want to get ahead of the actual meeting itself.”

‘FREEZE-FOR-FREEZE’

Last summer, major powers proposed a package of financial and diplomatic incentives to get Tehran to give up the uranium enrichment the West says is aimed at building a nuclear bomb.

Iran says its program is peaceful and intended to generate electricity.

A “freeze-for-freeze” idea was also offered — Iran must freeze expansion of its nuclear program in return for the U.N. Security Council halting further sanctions measures. The United Nations has imposed three rounds of sanctions.

The freeze-for-freeze idea is expected to be discussed again at Wednesday’s talks although Iran has said repeatedly it will not abandon its “right” to enrich uranium.

Wednesday’s meeting follows a series of overtures by the Obama administration toward Iran. Last week, the U.S. delegation at a conference on Afghanistan in the Hague directly handed over a letter, or aide-memoire, to the Iranians.

The letter, which sought Iran’s help in the case of three Americans, was a rare U.S. attempt to deal directly with Tehran instead of via Swiss interlocutors, who usually handle such matters as the two nations do not have diplomatic ties.

“The aide-memoire was symbolic of a shift in that we are prepared for direct diplomacy,” the U.S. official said.

In addition, senior U.S. diplomat Richard Holbrooke sought out the Iranian representative at the Hague meeting and held a brief, cordial conversation. Last month, Obama issued a video appeal to the Iranian people, urging “constructive ties” and a new beginning in U.S.-Iranian relations.

Menon, Hillary discuss Mumbai terror attacks

Washington, Mar 10 (ANI): Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon met US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Washington on Tuesday.Menon, who is on a four-day visit to the U.S, met Clinton at the State Department and discussed with her key bilateral and regional issues including the situation in Sri Lanka, progress on the Mumbai terror attacks and the next steps to be taken for the implementation of Indo-US nuclear deal.

Earlier, Menon met Under Secretary for Political Affairs William Burns and Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg.

Menon is scheduled to meet US President Barack Obama’s Special Envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Richard C. Holbrooke and several key Congressional leaders.

Holbrooke met Menon last month and was briefed about the situation prevailing in South Asia from an Indian perspective.

Holbrooke then said that he was in New Delhi to seek the Indian leaderships’ assessmed to brief the latter about his visits to Pakistan and Afghanistan respectively.

He said this common threat comes from developments in Pakistan’s remote Swat Valley, where the Taliban virtually calls the shots.

The Indian leadership is also said to have discussed the evidences that it had collected on the November 26, 2008 attacks on Mumbai with Holbrooke.

This is Menon’s first high-level visit to Washington after Obama became US President.

India has been urging the international community to put pressure on Islamabad to bring the perpetrators and attackers of the Mumbai carnage that claimed 179 lives to justice. It is also insisting that Pakistan must not allow terrorist activity to flower from its soil. (ANI)

Menon to discuss Mumbai terror attacks with US officials today

Washington, Mar 9 (ANI): Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon will discuss the progress made in the Mumbai terror attacks with the US officials here today.
Menon will meet the US Under Secretary of State William Burns and US President Barack Obama’s Special Envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Richard C. Holbrooke.

Issues like terrorism, the civil nuclear deal and the issues to be taken up at the upcoming G-20 meeting will be discussed during these meetings.

This is Menon’s first high-level visit to Washington after Obama became US President.

Holbrooke met Menon last month and was briefed about the situation prevailing in South Asia from an Indian perspective.

Holbrooke then said that he was in New Delhi to seek the Indian leaderships’ assessment of the situation in the region and to brief the latter about his visits to Pakistan and Afghanistan respectively.

He said this common threat comes from developments in Pakistan’s remote Swat Valley, where the Taliban virtually calls the shots.

The Indian leadership is also said to have discussed the evidences that it had collected on the November 26, 2008 attacks on Mumbai with Holbrooke.

India has been urging the international community to put pressure on Islamabad to bring the perpetrators and attackers of the Mumbai carnage that claimed 179 lives to justice.

It is also insisting that Pakistan must not allow terrorist activity to flower from its soil.(ANI)

Menon to discuss Mumbai terror attacks with US officials

Washington, Mar 8 (ANI): Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon will discuss the progress made in the Mumbai terror attacks with the US officials in Washington on Monday.
Menon, who is in America, will meet the US Under Secretary of State William Burns and US President Barack Obama’s Special Envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Richard C. Holbrooke.

Issues like terrorism, the civil nuclear deal and the issues to be taken up at the upcoming G-20 meeting will be discussed during these meetings.

This is Menon’s first high-level visit to Washington after Obama became US President.

Holbrooke met Menon last month and was briefed about the situation prevailing in South Asia from an Indian perspective.

Holbrooke then said that he was in New Delhi to seek the Indian leaderships’ assessment of the situation in the region and to brief the latter about his visits to Pakistan and Afghanistan respectively.

He said this common threat comes from developments in Pakistan’s remote Swat Valley, where the Taliban virtually calls the shots.

The Indian leadership is also said to have discussed the evidences that it had collected on the November 26, 2008 attacks on Mumbai with Holbrooke.

India has been urging the international community to put pressure on Islamabad to bring the perpetrators and attackers of the Mumbai carnage that claimed 179 lives to justice. It is also insisting that Pakistan must not allow terrorist activity to flower from its soil. (ANI)