Study shows Darwin living ‘affordable’

The Real Estate Institute says the Northern Territory is one of the most affordable places in Australia to pay off a mortgage.

The Institute’s Northern Territory head, Quentin Killian, says according to a survey it has done in the Territory, about 23 percent of a family’s income is needed to pay a mortgage.

He says that is lower than most other areas in Australia.

“Basically the data states and its quite clear that next to the ACT, the Northern Territory is still the most affordable place to purchase a house, or to pay the mortgage,” Mr Killian said.

The head of the welfare group Somerville Community Services, Vicki O’Halloran says the study does not reflect reality.

She says it does not take into account other costs that makes living in the Territory unaffordable, and more and more people in the Territory are struggling and going to welfare groups for help.

“Couples, double-income families, both working but cannot afford their rent or their mortgage just on basis that if they are to pay those and be on time with those they do not have enough disposable income to get through to next pay day,” Ms O’Halloran said.

“So therefore the balance of income that you would have to live on a weekly fortnightly basis would be less. Cost of groceries for example, power and water, just to get into venues.

“You often find that when you are interstate you have more cash in your purse.”

Mr Killian admits the study does not include those other factors, but he stands by the figures.

“The cost of living, the cost of extremely high power costs, the costs of higher than normal food costs absolutely … but that can’t be factored into how much it costs to service your mortgage.”

The Territory has an affordable housing shortage and business analysts have called for the housing market to be flooded with land to deal with demand.

Ms O’Halloran supported the call to flood the housing market with land.

“Let’s have a flood for a period and overcome in a short time the shortage of land and inevitably housing that we have at the moment,” she said.

Mr Killian says a flood is too much, but a big release is needed.

“Whatever the demand is let’s get ahead of demand, ” Mr Killian said.

“Let’s not just play catch up and catch up and catch up, because we have got a population growth of something like 2.7 percent per annum.

“The more you are playing catch-up, the more the population is growing on you, the more that gap is growing.”

Mr Killian said many young first-home buyers in the Territory expected too much when they look for their first home.

“Perhaps you should stop looking at Cullen Bay and saying I’m a 20-year-old and I want to live in Cullen Bay,” Mr Killian.

“There has to be a level at which you enter the market and say OK it is not what I want, it is not where I want to be at the end of the day, but it is a starting point.”

Doubt cast over casino jobs

About 250 people have turned out to protest against plans for a casino at Mildura in north-west Victoria.

The $400 million proposal has angered church and welfare groups, and last night’s meeting was addressed by anti-gaming campaigners Tim Costello, Paul Bendat and Nick Xenophon.

Mr Bendat says any economic benefits will be outweighed by the social misery a casino would bring.

“Studies done for the Tasmanian Government indicate that there is no economic benefit of having a casino, it’s jobs neutral, the jobs have to come from somewhere – they come from existing sectors and in this day and age a casino is not the tourist catalyst that it was,” he said.

The Member for Mildura, Peter Crisp, says at least a socio-economic study is needed for an informed decision on the Jewel Casino proposal.

The Government and developers have assured the $400 million casino will not go ahead without community support.

The developer has said community leaders are in a position to gauge community attitudes, but anti-gaming groups say there needs to be a referendum.

The Government and the Opposition are yet to take a position, but Mr Crisp says he supports calls for a plebiscite, or at the least a socio-economic study, to inform decision making.

“The Brumby Government need to get on with this and start letting the community know what the process will be – at present we are wandering around with an idea and not much more than that because we don’t have a process to subject that idea to,” he said.