Magma pulses may reveal Earth’s ‘heartbeat’

London, May 21 (ANI): Evidence from Hawaii and Iceland has indicated that the Earth may literally have a heartbeat, in the sense that the planet’s core may be dispatching simultaneous plumes of magma towards the surface every 15 million years or so.

According to a report in New Scientist, if the hypothesis is true, it would revolutionize our ideas of what’s happening far below our feet.

Rolf Mjelde of the University of Bergen and Jan Inge Faleide of the University of Oslo, both in Norway, used seismological data to measure the thickness of Earth’s crust between Iceland and Greenland.

Iceland is on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, where magma wells up to form fresh crust.

The measurements allowed Mjelde and Faleide to infer the past flow of magma in the plume generally thought to rise beneath Iceland.

When this plume is strong, it thickens the crust that it forms at the surface.

They found that the crust has thickened roughly every 15 million years, suggesting the plume pulses at around that frequency.

Regular pulsing of plumes is not a new idea, but when the pair compared their results with similar pulsing in Hawaii, which also sits on a plume, they found a surprising correlation.

Data collected by Emily Van Ark and Jian Lin of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Massachusetts, suggests that Hawaii’s plume pulses have coincided with Iceland’s.

“These two are on very different parts of the Earth, so I don’t think the synchrony could be related to something in the mantle,” said Mjelde. “It must relate to the core somehow. I can’t see any other possibility,” he added.

This would mean that the Earth’s core periodically heats up the overlying mantle, generating synchronized plumes that rise to the surface at widely separated spots.

“If correct, it would be a significant alteration from our current thoughts,” said Rhodri Davies of Imperial College London.

Most geologists who believe that mantle plumes exist think that pulsing can be explained by processes in the mantle alone, such as magma build-up in regions of different viscosity.

“A new way of thinking would be needed,” said Mjelde. (ANI)

Women more prone to ill effects of smoking

Washington, May 19 (ANI): Women are more susceptible to smoking’s lung damaging effects than men, says a new study.

Inga-Cecilie Soerheim, M.D., and colleagues from Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and University of Bergen, Norway analyzed data from a Norwegian case-control study including 954 subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 955 controls.

All were current- or ex-smokers, and the COPD subjects had moderate or severe COPD.

“Overall our analysis indicated that women may be more vulnerable to the effects of smoking, which is something previously suspected but not proven,” said Dr. Soerheim.

The study results have been presented at the 105th International Conference of the American Thoracic Society in San Diego.

Examining the total study sample, there were no gender differences with respect to lung function (FEV1) and COPD severity, but the women were on average younger and had smoked significantly less than men.

To explore these differences further, they also analyzed two subgroups of the study sample: COPD subjects under the age of 60 (early onset group) and COPD subjects with less than 20 pack-years of smoking (low exposure group). In both subgroups, women had more severe disease and greater impairment of lung function than men.

“This means that female smokers in our study experienced reduced lung function at a lower level of smoking exposure and at an earlier age than men,” said Dr. Soerheim.

It has long been suspected that the effect of smoking on lung function may be modified by gender. Interaction analysis confirmed that being female represents a higher risk of reduced lung function and severe COPD, but this gender effect was most pronounced when the level of smoking exposure was low.

According to Dr. Soerheim, the reason why women may be more susceptible to the effects of cigarette smoke is still unknown, but there are several possible explanations: “Women have smaller airways; therefore each cigarette may do more harm. Also, there are gender differences in the metabolism of cigarette smoke. Genes and hormones could also be important.” (ANI)