African leaders denounce Uganda bombers at summit

KAMPALA, July 25 (Reuters) – African leaders condemned Somalia’s al Shabaab rebels on Sunday at a Kampala summit officials say will beef up an African force fighting the group behind attacks that killed 76 people in Uganda this month.

The African Union (AU) meeting in the Ugandan capital, the site of two suicide attacks on soccer fans watching the World Cup final on television, has put the Somali crisis at the top of the agenda and more than 30 African leaders are under pressure to respond.

The summit’s main debating point has been the mandate of an AU peacekeeping force of 6,300, which has been responsible for preventing Somalia’s government falling to rebel attacks in the capital Mogadishu.

The force is made of up of Ugandan and Burundian troops and that, together with allegations that it has killed civilians with indiscriminate shelling, was the reason given by the rebels for the attack.

Delegates told Reuters a cap of 8,100 on troop levels would be lifted during the meeting. A more contentious possibility was that the force, known as AMISOM, be given permission to go after the rebels. It can now fight only when attacked.

AU Commission Chairman Jean Ping called the al Shabaab attacks “despicable” and said the continental body was ready to step up its response.

“The commission is already planning the next phases in the deployment of AMISOM in terms of the enlarged mandate, increased troop strength and appropriate equipment,” he said.

Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan said his government condemned the attack and called al Shabaab “extremists”. Nigeria has pledged in the past to send troops to Somalia, but has yet to do so.

GOOD INFORMATION

Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni told delegates his government was getting “very good information” from suspects arrested after the bombings.

Diplomats at the summit told Reuters the heightened rhetoric might be a sign the AU was ready to give AMISOM permission to chase down al Shabaab, a group with links to al Qaeda which wants to impose its own harsh version of sharia law in Somalia.

Some countries are against the policy change, citing evidence that AMISOM has killed civilians. They argue such incidents could be a recruitment boon to al Shabaab, which controls parts of the capital and much of southern Somalia.

At least six civilians were killed and 20 wounded in Mogadishu on Sunday when a shell landed in a busy market. Witnesses said they had no idea where it had been fired from.

Since the start of the Islamist insurgency in Somalia in 2007, more than 21,000 civilians have been killed and rights groups have accused all sides in the conflict of war crimes.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said his government would share intelligence with Uganda and help catch the bombers. Dozens of U.S. forensic experts are combing the bomb sites in Kampala.

“We are now bound not only by friendship and partnership but also by a shared loss, a shared threat, a shared grief,” Holder told the African leaders.

“These acts are nothing more than reprehensible acts of cowardice inspired by a radical and corrupt ideology that subverts the peaceful teachings of a great religion.”

The AU said on Friday Guinea would send a battalion of troops to join AMISOM. The East African regional bloc IGAD last month pledged to send another 2,000 troops. That would take levels beyond the cap of 8,100.

Taliban can choke NATO supplies

Lahore, May 1 (ANI): The Taliban has the potential to not only expand suicide attacks inside Pakistan, but also to put greater pressure on the routes ferrying supplies to NATO troops in Afghanistan.

The new US plan calls for increasing troop levels in Afghanistan, would require more supplies. And the most viable overland supply lines run through Pakistan.

Seventy percent of Western supplies to NATO forces pass through the Tribal Areas of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan. The supplies are offloaded in Karachi and trucked to depots in Peshawar, then through the Khyber Pass to Kabul.

The Khyber Pass is particularly vulnerable. Blowing up a bridge there can shut down convoy traffic for days. This has happened seven times since September. The depots and terminals in Peshawar have also been plagued by suspected Taliban sabotage.

The Daily Times quoted Stratfor analyst Kamran Bokhari as suggesting that the Pakistan Army should be involved in ferrying supplies.

“If the army is doing it or is in charge of ferrying all these supplies and making sure they reach their destinations, there is a monetary incentive in that because there’s a lot of money involved and the military will get a cut in that,” Bokhari said.

Brian Cloughley, a former Australian army military attach‚ in Islamabad, says the system is riddled with corruption among the contractors.

“There’s quite a lot of underhanded manoeuvring concerning contracts and, of course, the actual passage of vehicles because one contractor can perhaps say, ‘Right, if you are not going to pay me off, I will ensure that your convoy is torched’,” he said. (ANI)

New Zealand reluctant to send more troops to Afghanistan

Wellington – New Zealand is reluctant to send more troops to Afghanistan because it believes the situation there is becoming more unstable, Prime Minister John Key said Monday.

“The determining factor is whether we can see a plan, whether the plan in our opinion is likely to work and whether it fits in with our long-term exit strategy,” he said at his weekly news conference.

The United States has asked New Zealand to commit more troops to Afghanistan on top of the 130 army engineers it has working in Bamyan province as a provincial reconstruction team (PRT).

News reports have said that Washington would like a unit of New Zealand’s crack Special Air Services forces, who were last deployed in Afghanistan in 2006, to return as part of President Barack Obama’s plan to increase foreign troop levels in Afghanistan to better combat Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters.

But Key said, “The risk assessments that I’m getting from Afghanistan is that our troops in the PRT in Bamyan province are becoming more at risk – in other words, the situation in Afghanistan is becoming more unstable.

“It would be my long-term desire to exit our commitment in Afghanistan,” he said.

Key said the government was reviewing the military situation in Afghanistan before it made a final decision on sending more troops. (dpa)

Obama to seek $83.4 billion for Iraqi, Afghan wars

WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama is seeking $83.4 billion for US military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, pressing for a war
supplemental spending bill like the ones he sometimes opposed when he was senator and George W. Bush was president.
Obama’s request would push the costs of the two wars to almost $1 trillion since the September 11, 2001, terror attacks against the United States, according to the Congressional Research Service. The additional money would cover operations into the latter months of this year.

Budget office spokesman Tom Gavin said the White House would send an official request to Congress Thursday afternoon. Congressional aides briefed on the request revealed its overall cost on condition of anonymity since the briefing was private.

Obama was a harsh critic of the Iraq war as a candidate, a stance that attracted support from the Democratic Party’s liberal base and helped him secure the party’s nomination. He opposed two infusions of war money in 2007 after Bush used a veto to force Congress to remove a withdrawal timeline from the $99 billion measure.

He supported a war funding bill last year that also included about $25 billion for domestic programs; he also voted to pay for the wars in 2006, before he announced his candidacy for president.

The coming request will include $75.8 billion for the military and more than $7 billion in foreign aid. Pakistan, a key ally in the fight against al-Qaida, would receive $1.8 billion in aid.

The measure would also finance Obama’s recently-announced plan to boost troop levels in Afghanistan.

The White House wants the bill sent to Obama for his signature by Memorial Day, May 25, said a House of Representatives Democratic aide.

Obama announced plans in February to withdraw US troops from Iraq on a 19-month timetable, with all troops to be out of Iraq by the end of 2011.

Obama’s request would push the amount approved for 2009 to about $150 billion, a drop from the $171 billion cost incurred in 2007 and the $188 billion approved for 2008, when Bush increased the tempo of military operations in a generally successful effort to quell the Iraq insurgency.

US envoy holds talks with Indian officials on security issues

New Delhi – US special envoy Richard Holbrooke held discussions on regional security with top Indian officials Wednesday following a visit to Pakistan and Afghanistan, officials said.

Holbrooke, President Barack Obama’s special representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, and US Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen met with India’s Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon and National Security Advisor MK Narayanan in New Delhi.

The NDTV network reported that India’s concerns over Obama’s new policy on Afghanistan and Pakistan dominated the discussions.

Holbrooke is also believed to have discussed ways in which New Delhi could cooperate in US efforts to “defeat” terrorism originating from Pakistan and Afghanistan, the PTI news agency reported.

India has expressed concerns over Obama’s new policy that doles out a 7.5-billion-dollar financial package to Pakistan in return for greater commitment to fight the Taliban and al-Qaeda militants.

Indian officials question the rationale of military and economic assistance, saying Pakistan has not been held accountable for the resurgence of Taliban in the region.

New Delhi had earlier turned down Washington’s request to resume a bilateral peace process with Pakistan. It said the dialogue will not commence until Pakistan dismantled the terrorist infrastucture on its soil.

India calls Pakistan the “epicentre of terrorism” that abets Islamist militant groups like the Lashkar-e-Taiba, which was behind the attacks in Mumbai last November that killed at least 170 people.

Local media reports said India had also withstood US pressure to reduce its troop levels along the borders with Pakistan so that Islamabad could focus on its western frontiers.

The Indian security establishment has argued there is a real danger of the violence spilling over into India, with reports indicating that militants could infiltrate into the troubled India-administered Kashmir in the coming weeks.

The two senior US officials arrived in India late Tuesday night from Islamabad, where Holbrooke said the United States and Pakistan face a “common strategic threat, a common enemy, a common challenge and therefore a common task.”(dpa)

Holbrooke told reporters the US had no plans to negotiate between India and Pakistan but stressed that the neighbouring countries should work toward peaceful relations.

British government to hold inquiry over Iraq war

London – The British government is to hold an independent comprehensive inquiry into the planning and conduct of the Iraq war once the bulk of combat troops have come home by the end of July, Foreign Secretary David Miliband announced Wednesday.

A full inquiry would be set up “as soon as practical” after July 31 when British troop levels will have been reduced to 400 from the current 4,100 troops still stationed in southern Iraq.

“The accumulation of internal lessons learned over the last six years, as well as internal reviews, is all material that an inquiry could draw on,” Miliband told parliament.

The Labour government had previously rejected opposition calls for an independent inquiry while troops remained in Iraq. However, Miliband did not give any details of its remit Wednesday.

The inquiry is due to cover the period in the run-up to the 2003 invasion and the process of political decision-making by the previous government of Tony Blair.

It is expected to examine the vexed questions of the legal foundations for going to war and the – now discredited – allegation that Saddam Hussein held an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction.

“The purpose of the inquiry is to learn lessons … it should indeed be the sort of comprehensive look at the planning and the conduct of the war as well as the conduct of the peace-building afterwards,” said Miliband.

Commentators said the inquiry was likely to provide Prime Minister Gordon Brown with a welcome opportunity to “draw a line of distinction” over the Iraq issue between his government and that led by his predecessor.

It is likely to be established in the autumn after the parliamentary summer recess. (dpa)

Obama more analytical than Bush, says Gates

Washington, Mar.2 (ANI): US Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said that he finds President Barack Obama more analytical on issues than former President George W Bush.

Speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press”, Gates said: “It’s hard to say. I think probably President Obama is somewhat more analytical, and he makes sure he hears from everybody in the room on an issue, and if they don’t speak up, he calls on them.”

In contrast, President Bush didn’t go out of his way to elicit input from those in the room, Gates said.

Gates believes the possibility that the plan to withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011 would change is “fairly remote,” but noted that President Obama has the authority to alter the plan.

He also said that field commanders would have preferred keeping current troop levels through the end of 2010.

Currently, all combat forces are expected to be out of Iraq by August 31, 2010, with up to 50,000 troops remaining in advisory capacities.

Gates is the first Secretary of Defense to have served under presidents of both parties. (ANI)

Obama more analytical than Bush, says Gates

Washington, Mar.2 (ANI): US Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said that he finds President Barack Obama more analytical on issues than former President George W Bush.

Speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press”, Gates said: “It’s hard to say. I think probably President Obama is somewhat more analytical, and he makes sure he hears from everybody in the room on an issue, and if they don’t speak up, he calls on them.”

In contrast, President Bush didn’t go out of his way to elicit input from those in the room, Gates said.

Gates believes the possibility that the plan to withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011 would change is “fairly remote,” but noted that President Obama has the authority to alter the plan.

He also said that field commanders would have preferred keeping current troop levels through the end of 2010.

Currently, all combat forces are expected to be out of Iraq by August 31, 2010, with up to 50,000 troops remaining in advisory capacities.

Gates is the first Secretary of Defense to have served under presidents of both parties. (ANI)

Obama more analytical than Bush, says Gates

Washington, Mar.2 (ANI): US Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said that he finds President Barack Obama more analytical on issues than former President George W Bush.

Speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press”, Gates said: “It’s hard to say. I think probably President Obama is somewhat more analytical, and he makes sure he hears from everybody in the room on an issue, and if they don’t speak up, he calls on them.”

In contrast, President Bush didn’t go out of his way to elicit input from those in the room, Gates said.

Gates believes the possibility that the plan to withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011 would change is “fairly remote,” but noted that President Obama has the authority to alter the plan.

He also said that field commanders would have preferred keeping current troop levels through the end of 2010.

Currently, all combat forces are expected to be out of Iraq by August 31, 2010, with up to 50,000 troops remaining in advisory capacities.

Gates is the first Secretary of Defense to have served under presidents of both parties. (ANI)