Two or more groups could have tutored Times Square suspect

Washington/New York, May 7 (IANS) US investigators probing the aborted Times Square bombing attempt have shifted their focus to prime suspect Faisal Shahzad’s links in Pakistan and a counter-terrorism expert has said two or more groups could have worked together in grooming Shahzad for a terrorist mission.

Meanwhile, the US is planning to send Pakistan a detailed request for ‘urgent and specific assistance’ in the aborted bombing case, the Washington Post reported.

According to the daily, a US counter-terrorism official was cited as saying it was possible that two or more groups had worked together in grooming Shahzad for a terrorist mission during an extended trip he made to Pakistan last year.

The influential daily cited US officials as saying that they had reached no firm conclusion about whether Shahzad had ties to any domestic militant group in Pakistan, but that information gathered thus far continued to point to the Pakistani Taliban, which has asserted responsibility for the bombing attempt.

The question of which group, if any, was involved is an important one for the future of the uneasy counter-terrorism alliance between the United States and Pakistan, it said.

‘The Pakistani military has been waging war against the Pakistani Taliban for more than a year, with US assistance,’ the Post said.

‘But Pakistan might be more reluctant to take action against other groups, particularly those focused on separating the disputed region of Kashmir from India.’

‘Some, particularly the Lashkar-e-Taiba, thought responsible for terrorist attacks in India, have strong support within the Pakistani intelligence service,’ it noted.

The Post cited Pakistani officials aiding in the Times Square case as saying they have arrested some people linked to a third group, Jaish-e-Muhammad, which is focused on Kashmir but has also turned its efforts against US troops in Afghanistan.

US intelligence suspects there is increasing overlap and coordination among domestic Pakistani groups and the Pakistan-based Afghan Taliban and Al Qaeda, the daily said.

The Post said pressure on Pakistan to escalate its domestic counter-terrorism operations, particularly toward Kashmir – and India-focused militants, could increase anti-US sentiment there, while any perceived Pakistani hesitation would undermine congressional and public support in the US.

White House spokesperson Robert Gibbs told reporters that the justice department and investigating agencies are actively looking at the time which Shahzad spent in Pakistan, but did not go into details.

The New York Times also cited unnamed officials as saying that after two days of intense questioning Shahzad, an American citizen of Pakistani origin, evidence was mounting that the Pakistani Taliban had helped inspire and train Shahzad in the months before he drove the car bomb to Times Square Saturday night.

Officials said Shahzad had discussed his contacts with the group, and investigators had accumulated other evidence that they would not disclose.

On Wednesday, Shahzad, the 30-year-old son of a retired senior Pakistani Air Force officer, waived his right to a speedy arraignment, a possible sign of his continuing cooperation with investigators, the Times said.

One senior Obama administration official cited by the Times cautioned that ‘there are no smoking guns yet’ that the Pakistani Taliban had directed the Times Square bombing.

But others said that there were strong indications that Shahzad knew some members of the group and that they probably had a role in training him. American officials said it had become increasingly difficult to separate the operations of the militant groups in Pakistan’s tribal areas.

Besides the Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda, groups operating in the tribal areas are the Haqqani Network and the Kashmiri groups Lashkar-e-Taiba, blamed for the Mumbai terror attacks, and Jaish-e-Muhammad.

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal said Shahzad possibly received instruction from the Pakistan Taliban’s suicide-bomb trainer.

If verified, the suspected links between Pakistan Taliban and Shahzad would mark a stark shift in how it and related jihadist groups, which have so far focused on attacks within Pakistan and in India, not the US, pursue their goals, it said.

Pakistani investigators are also probing Shahzad’s possible connections with Jaish-e-Muhammad, an outlawed Islamist militant group, after the arrest Tuesday of Tohaid Ahmed and Mohammed Rehan in Karachi, the Journal said.

The two men were believed to have links to Jaish, it said citing a senior Pakistani government official. Ahmed had been in email contact with Shahzad.

Rehan took Shahzad to South Waziristan, the official was quoted as saying. There, Shahzad received training in explosives in a camp run by Qari Hussain, a senior commander with Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan who trains suicide bombers, the official was quoted as saying.

Hussain is also a cousin of Hakimullah Mehsud, the Pakistan Taliban’s chief.

Hussain claimed responsibility for the attempted attack in a weekend audio message. His message followed a video of Mehsud, the Pakistan Taliban leader, in which he warned of a wave of attacks on the US. ‘Our fighters are already in the United States,’ said Mehsud.

Radio Pakistan unhappy over criticism of Jaswant Singh book on Jinnah

Abohar, Sep.3 (ANI): The expelled Bharatiya Janata Party leader Jaswant Singh has got a new fan in Punjabi Durbar programme of Radio Pakistan.

In its latest edition, the Punjabi Durbar programme has described all political parties of India be it Bharatiya Janata Party, Congress or Shiv Sena being anti-Pakistan for voicing objection to Jaswant Singh’s book- “Jinnah-India, Partition, Independence”.

In its recent Punjabi Durbar Programme, Radio Pakistan said that Jaswant Singh has paid a huge price for his biography of Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan.

Many Indian scholars have expressed sympathy with Jaswant Singh, but have taken exception to Pakistan Radio describing all Indian political parties as anti-Pakistan.

Anil Kumar, a historian and a commentator on current affairs has stated that political parties in India have tried their best to cultivate good relations with Pakistan ever since independence.

“India has been maintaining friendly relationship with Pakistan since 1947. India parted with funds held by united India, when Jinnah demanded it. Even after Pakistani aggression in 1965 and 1971, India returned to Pakistan the territory which was in India’s possession in the hope that there would be cordial relations between the two countries,” he said.

“Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh have been continuously trying to maintain good relations with Pakistan, but Pakistan continued terrorist attacks in India,” Anil Kumar added.

“India is a secular country. There are more Muslims in India than the total population of Pakistan. Moslems are happy to be in India. Many feel that they are safer than in Pakistan, which is being subjected to violence by the Taliban,” said Anil kumar, who is, an expert on Indo-Pak affairs.

India is continuing talks at different levels despite incidents like Mumbai terror attacks and Pakistan’s ongoing support to militancy in Kashmir.

It is surprising that broadcasters of Radio Pakistan expect political parties in India to sing praise of Jinnah, who was chiefly responsible for the division of the sub-continent on the basis of religious identities.

They accept Jinnah’s contribution during the freedom struggle against the British Raj, but are critical of his role in dividing the country. (ANI)

Krishna to Pakistan: Shun go -slow policy against 26/11 perpetrators

New Delhi, Aug 26 (ANI): External Affairs Minister S. M. Krishna on Wednesday criticised Pakistan’s go-slow policy on 26/11 perpetrators and asked Islamabad to immediately act against Lashkar-e- Taiba founder Hafiz Saeed.

On Tuesday Interpol issued a Red Corner Notice against Saeed, and Zaki -ur- Rehman Lakhvi who are considered the masterminds of 26/11.

The notice was issued after a Mumbai court issued non-bailable warrants against both terrorists. peaking to newsmen here Krishna said, “Interpol’s Red Corner Notice on Saeed is the vindication of what India says. The perpetrators of Mumbai attack will have to be brought to be justice. We have painstakingly collected evidence to convey the involvement of the persons.”

He termed Pakistan’s rejection of India’s fifth dossier as unfortunate.

“It is very unfortunate that the Pakistan has rejected the dossier, but at the same time Interpol has given a Red Corner notice. I think the world should take note of these developments and come to their own conclusion,” Krishna said.

Pakistan’s Interior Minister Rehman Malik said on Tuesday that if India does not provide tangible information on the 26/11 attacks and the Samjhauta Express tragedy, Islamabad would not be responsible for any future terrorist attacks in India.

Krishna, however, added that India would continue to impress on Pakistan to act on terrorist organizations.

India had also sent proof and request for issuing Red Corner notice against Lashkar commander Zarar Shah and Abu Al Qama. Interpol said that it was analyzing the evidence against them. (ANI)

Security threats in India can’t be equated with Pak: ICC

Melbourne, Apr 24 (ANI): ICC chairman David Morgan remains “fairly confident” that the World Cup 2011 will still be held on the subcontinent, believing the security threats in India should not be equated to those in Pakistan.

The ICC last week removed Pakistan as a co-host of the World Cup, leaving India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh as the joint hosts.

Morgan sees a future where security is no longer the sport’s burning issue, describing himself as an optimist.

“India is a vast country, so to talk about the number of terrorist attacks in India and compare it with the number in Pakistan is not really drawing a fair comparison,” he said.

Morgan cited the ICC’s stripping of Pakistan’s hosting rights as proof they would act decisively if expert advice indicated they should.

“We’ve learnt from our mistakes, we’ve been tardy in our taking of difficult decisions in the past, we took a difficult decision this last weekend and I’m sure that it is one that needed to be taken,” The Herald Sun quoted Morgan, as saying.

Morgan adds that it would be a mistake to suppose cricket’s security concerns are limited to the subcontinent.

“If you go back to the last time Australia were in the United Kingdom, 2005, the Ashes series, Australia were at Headingley, at Leeds, playing a one-day international against England and the London bombings were taking place,” he added.

Morgan has no doubt Pakistan cricket will survive the dual setbacks of no live cricket for their fans and the associated loss of revenue, saying Australia’s tour of the UAE was an important first step.

There are also negotiations underway aimed at working out how to ease Pakistan cricket’s financial burden. Morgan believes Pakistan will eventually play at home again.

“I’m not a pessimist, I’m an optimist, I don’t believe that safety and security is going to be the issue it is today forever and ever.”

Drawing a parallel with a situation linked to his own homeland, the Englishman said the achievement of relative peace in Northern Ireland after years of political and religious conflict showed such issues could be resolved. (ANI)