Women of greater genetic diversity have more sex partners

Sydney, Mar 5 (ANI): Women of greater genetic diversity have more sexual partners, concludes a new study.

After showing a series of genes linked to the immune system, Western Australia researchers say it can be explained why some women are more sexually successful than others.

The genes are thought to make them more attractive to potential partners.

According to professor Leigh Simmons, of the University of Western Australia, having a diverse set of genes was beneficial because it meant a person had more defenses against invading germs.

Such genetic ””success”” was thought to influence mate choice, the expert claimed.

When searching for a mate, on the subconscious level, people are seeking out someone with different genes from their own to create offspring with a lot of genetic diversity, said Professor Simmons.

He said that a specific group of genes called the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), a driver of the immune system, had previously been shown to influence mate choice, reports The Sydney Morning Herald.

To test if this genetic diversity affected the number of sexual partners a person had, the research team assessed the genetic variability of 74 females and had them fill in a questionnaire about their sex life.

After removing the bias associated with age and sexual attitudes, Professor Simmons found those women who had more genetic diversity in their MHC complex reported more sexual partners over their lifetime.

The number of partners was predicted by genetic variability, said Professor Simmons.

The study has been published in the journal of Animal Behaviour. (ANI)

Second child within a year ‘increases breast cancer risk’

London, Sept 14 (ANI): Having a second child within a year of the first birth can increase a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer, finds a new study.

The research, involving 30,000 women each of whom had produced five or more children, has shown that those with a gap of less than 12 month were 5.2 times more likely to develop the advanced ductal breast cancer than women who had a gap of three or more years.

Although it is unclear that why the risk increases, researchers believe hormones might be involved.

Alternatively, other risk factors may have influenced the results, including being overweight, and whether or not the mother chooses to breast-feed.

“Women who had their first two births close together should not be worried by these findings because the study’s results are not conclusive,” the Telegraph quoted Josephine Querido, senior science information officer at Cancer Research UK, as saying.

“The researchers looked at a very specific group of women – those who had a specific type of breast cancer, who had advanced tumours, who were under 50, and who had at least five children. In studies like this, dividing the group of people you’re looking at into lots of smaller groups makes it likely that you’ll find a positive result in one of the subgroups just by chance.

“For all women, it’s important to go to the GP if they spot any unusual changes in their breast, and to go for screening when invited,” Querido added.

The study appears in the British Journal of Cancer. (ANI)

Scientists unveil novel approach to study Parkinson’s treatment

Washington, April 17 (ANI): Stanford University researchers claim that they have identified a specific group of cells that can be direct targets of deep brain stimulation (DBS), a Parkinson’s treatment.

Lead researcher Karl Deisseroth attributes this advance to a technique to systematically characterize disease circuits in the brain.

The researcher says that the NSF-funded technology, termed optogenetics, enabled them to precisely control individual components of the circuit implicated in Parkinson’s disease.

The novel technology uses light-activated proteins, originally isolated from bacteria, in combination with genetic approaches to control specific parts of the brain.

It is a vast improvement over previous methods because it allows researchers to precisely stimulate neurons, and measure the effect of treatment simultaneously in animals with Parkinson’s-like symptoms.

Deisseroth’s team found that they could reduce disease symptoms by preferentially activating neurons that link to the subthalamic nucleus region of the brain.

The researchers first treated these specific cells in a way that made them sensitive to stimulation by blue light, and then implanted an optical fibre in the brain.

When researchers rapidly flashed blue light inside the animals’ brains the disease symptoms improved.

They said that treating with slower flashes of light actually made the symptoms worse, and targeting other kinds of cells had no effect at all, indicating both proper cell type and stimulation frequency are crucial components of effective treatment.

According to the research team, flashing blue light on portions of the same neurons found closer to the outer surface of the brain had an effect similar to treatment deep within the brain, raising the possibility that researchers may be able to develop treatments that are less invasive than current options.

Deisseroth said: “The brain is an electrical device, but it is a very complicated device. Think of it as an orchestra without sections: all of the types of instruments, or cells, are mixed together. Treatments like DBS are unrefined, in that they stimulate all of the cells or instruments. The optogenetic approach allows us to control stimulation of specific cells in the brain on the appropriate timescale, much like a conductor directing specific sections of an orchestra at the appropriate time.”

He added: “We need to understand the players before we can develop effective treatment strategies.”

An article on the research team’s work has been published in the journal Science. (ANI)

Facebook Jews group suddenly praises Hitler

Washington, Mar 27 (ANI): A group on the social-networking site calling itself “I Heart Jews” garnered more than 2,000 members until the group’s name was suddenly changed to “Hitler: Great Modern Man of History”.

“It’s disgusting. It’s despicable,” said Facebook user Wendy Erdheim, who had been part of the group.

Other members of the group were similarly shocked. “Is this a joke?” posted one. “Because if it is not I am absolutely appalled.”

Mark Weitzman of the Simon Wiesenthal Center said the name change was no accident. “One would have to say that it’s premeditated and that the intent was there from the beginning,” FOX News quoted Weitzman, as saying.

“We don’t allow groups that are hateful or threatening, for example, and will remove these as quickly as possible when they’re reported,” a Facebook spokesman said.

He confirmed that this specific group’s name had indeed been changed to “Hitler: Great Modern Man of History,” but was later changed again to “I Love Jews” and was still on the site.

Postings to one of the 10 different “I Love Jews” groups on Facebook clearly referred to the Hitler name change, which appears to have taken place on or around March 18. It seems the group was renamed again Tuesday. (ANI)