When it comes to adoption, US parents avoid African-American babies, boys

Washington, Apr 21 (ANI): Parents pursuing adoption within the United States tend to avoid taking African-American babies and boys, according to a study.

The above results came from the study conducted by economists from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), the London School of Economics, and New York University (NYU).

They found that parents have strong preferences regarding the types of babies they will apply for, tending to choose non-African-American girls, and favouring babies who are close to being born as opposed to those who have already been born or who are early in gestation.

These preferences are significant, and can be quantified in terms of the amount of money the potential adoptive parents are willing to pay in finalizing their adoption.

While the data are intriguing, the real value of the study is that it can give policymakers a more rational, evidence-driven base from which to consider the implications of policies and laws, such as those that restrict adoption by single-sex and foreign couples, said the researchers.

The key to these findings, according to the researchers, was the data set they were able to put together.

“These data are unique,” said Leeat Yariv, associate professor of economics at Caltech.

The researchers, however, were able to gather information—from a website run by an adoption intermediary—over a five-year period (between 2004 and 2009).

The intermediary works to bring together—to match—potential adoptive parents with birth mothers seeking to relinquish their children for adoption.

The website operates somewhat like an online real estate site. We could see the attributes of the children—race, gender, age—and even the finalization costs, or the amount of money the adoptive parent would need to pay to finalize the adoption. In addition, we could see which children the potential adoptive parents applied for,” she explained.

In other words, the team could see which babies attracted interest from potential adoptive parents, and determine which traits were most likely to lead to a successful adoption.

This revealed three main patterns—first, the researchers found that a non-African-American baby is seven times more likely to “attract the interest and attention of potential adoptive parents than an African-American baby,” said Felli.

The second pattern shown was the gender preference.

“A girl has a higher—by slightly more than one-third—chance of attracting the attention of potential adoptive parents than a boy,” said an author of the study.

The researchers also found that the interest of potential adoptive parents in a particular baby depends on the stage of gestation.

“While unborn children become increasingly attractive over the birth mother”s pregnancy, probably because the match involves less uncertainty from the adoptive parents” perspective,” said another study author.

“We find that the desirability of a child decreases dramatically right after birth,” added the author.

This means, according to researchers that “bureaucratic obstacles disrupting an adoption plan at the time of birth are extremely detrimental to the future prospects of the child.” (ANI)

Girls who go to single-sex schools find ‘girly’ guys more attractive

London, Aug 28 (ANI): Studying in single-sex schools can have a significant impact on who you find attractive, claims a new study.

The study suggests that female students surrounded every day by girls are more attracted to feminine looking boys, such as High School Musical star Zac Efron.

While boys at all-male schools are more likely to go for girls with more masculine faces.

Lead researcher and psychologist Dr Tamsin Saxton in collaboration with the universities of Aberdeen, Stirling and Liverpool have, however, found the effect was weakened if children had siblings of the opposite sex at home.

“The research is evidence that a person’s ‘visual diet’ can influence what they think is attractive,” the Scotsman quoted Saxton as saying.

During the study, the researchers recruited 240 children aged 11 to 15 at co-educational and single-sex schools to rate faces for attractiveness

The faces had been digitally manipulated to look subtly more masculine or feminine.

The researchers also asked whether they had brothers or sisters at home.

“Interestingly, the weakest effect of ‘visual diet’ was in relation to boys’ judgments of girls’ faces,” Saxton said.

“This might be because femininity is such an overriding cue to female facial attractiveness, or perhaps because even at a single-sex school boys see more female faces around them, in their teachers and so on,” Saxton added.

“This kind of study helps researchers understand how the brain processes faces. Faces are crucial to our everyday interactions, and the brain has specialised areas dedicated to dealing with them,” said Dr Anthony Little, of Stirling University.

The findings are published in the scientific journal Personality and Individual Differences. (ANI)

Veteran golfer Gary Player hits out at Scottish club’s men-only policy

London, June 28 (ANI): Veteran golfer Gary Player became the youngest Open Championship winner when he lifted the Claret Jug at Muirfield in 1959, but fifty years on, he has hit out at the men-only policy of the club in Scotland.

The 73-year-old South African made it clear that he was distinctly uncomfortable with the Honourable Company of Edinburgh Golfers’ single-sex policy.

Player, who was 23 when he lifted the Claret Jug at Muirfield, said: “One thing travel has taught me is to have respect for other people’s point of view but I have to tell you, I do not agree with (the policy].

“Golf would not be the game it is without women. Winston Churchill said that change is the price of survival. I agree with that. I just don’t see the point of excluding any member of society.”

The veteran added: “That policy is their business. It’s a decision they’ve made and they’ve got to live with it.

“I have designed many golf courses all over the world and I wouldn’t like to think any of them would exclude women.”

Club secretary Alastair Brown was taken aback by Player’s comments. He said: “We are a private members’ club and we conduct our own affairs. We don’t have lady members, but ladies play here every day as guests. I’m interested in Gary’s comments. His views haven’t stopped him from returning to the club with a group of people in a week’s time.”

Player is due to host a sponsors’ day at Muirfield on Monday next week to commemorate the half-century that has elapsed since his Open triumph there. The following day he will host the Gary Player Invitational at nearby Archerfield.

All money raised from the event will go to underprivileged children in rural South Africa.

Muirfield is a golf course in Gullane, East Lothian, Scotland, which is one of the courses used in rotation for The Open Championship.

Muirfield has hosted The Open Championship fifteen times, most recently in 2002 when Ernie Els lifted the trophy. Other past winners at Muirfield include Nick Faldo (twice), Tom Watson, Lee Trevino, Jack Nicklaus, Gary Player, Henry Cotton, Alf Perry, Walter Hagen, Harry Vardon and Harold Hilton.

Muirfield has also hosted The Amateur Championship, the Ryder Cup, the Walker Cup, the Curtis Cup and many other tournaments.

Muirfield is due to host the Open for the 16th time in 2013 and the event will doubtless draw more attention to the club’s single-sex rule.

When the tournament was last held in East Lothian in 2002, a number of wives and girlfriends of top players publicly expressed their disapproval. (ANI)

Girls are better off at single-sex schools

London, Mar 18 (ANI): When it comes to academic performance, girls studying in single sex schools are better off than their co-ed counterparts, according to a study.

The analysis of the GCSE scores of more than 700,000 girls taught in the state sector revealed that those at girls’ schools consistently made more progress than those in co-ed secondaries.

Away from the distraction of boys, and free to excel in science and maths, girls in single-sex schools were more likely thrive than those in co-ed schools.

During the study, conducted on behalf of the Good Schools Guide, the researchers examined the “contextually value added” scores for every girl who took GCSEs in the state sector between 2005 and 2007.

Over the period, the researchers found all the girls studying in girls-only school did better than predicted, while those in mixed-sex schools 20pct did worse than expected.

“A lot of parents will look at the benefits of co-ed schools, like the fact that girls and boys are educated side-by-side preparing them for the world of work and life,” the Guardian quoted Janette Wallis, editor of the Good Schools Guide, as saying.

“But to disregard this evidence would be a mistake. We never expected to see such a difference,” she added.

Wallis said that the effect could be down to girls working better without boys “distracting” them, but acknowledged the fact that educationally aspirant parents could seek out girls-only schools, which could also make a difference.

The study suggests that pupils who are struggling academically when they start secondary school reap greater benefits from girls-only schooling.

“It is very interesting that girls seem to be making more progress at single-sex schools. It does support a body of research evidence that girls do better in single-sex environments,” said Alice Sullivan, a researcher at the Institute of Education, University of London, and a specialist in single-sex schooling.

However, some of the experts said that the research was more conflicting.

“We know across the piece that the main variables relating to exam success are pupil characteristics, social background and quality of teacher,” said Alan Smithers, director of education at Buckingham University.

“There is very little space for gender in the classroom to make a difference. Where it apparently has an effect it relates to other factors, such as the aspirations of the parents who want their daughter educated in a single-sex school. But if this is true it will change our understanding,” he added.

Sue Dunford, headteacher of Southfield School for Girls in Kettering, said: “It’s a question of confidence in the way girls develop. It’s cool to be very good at anything in a girls school – maths, sciences or physics. No one will ask why you’re doing a boys’ subject. Girls who lack confidence can thrive more in girls-only schools. We don’t have boys competing and distracting, so girls can really go for it.” (ANI)