Iranian prosecutor urges Islamic dress checks

(Reuters) – Iran’s prosecutor called on Sunday for tighter checks on women who fail to observe Islamic dress code in public, the semi-official Mehr news agency reported.

Under Iran’s Sharia law, imposed after the 1979 Islamic revolution, women are obliged to cover their hair and wear long, loose-fitting clothes. Violators can receive lashes, fines or imprisonment.

“Unfortunately the law … which considers violation of the Islamic dress code as a punishable crime, has not been implemented in the country in the past 15 years,” said general prosecutor Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei.

“Under the law, violators of public chastity should be punished by being sentenced to up to two months in jail or 74 lashes.”

Strict dress codes were enforced in the years after the revolution but in recent years clamp downs have tended to last just weeks or months in summer, when women wear lighter clothing such as calf-length trousers and colored scarves.

Young women in urban areas often defy the limitations by wearing tight clothing and colorful headscarves that barely cover their hair. The codes are less commonly flouted in rural regions.

Enforcement of codes governing women’s dress have become stricter since President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad took office in 2005, promising a return to the values of the revolution.

The president’s hardline supporters, who say Islamic attire helps protect women against the sex symbol status they have in the West, have pressed for tighter controls on “immoral behavior.”

“It is up to the judge to decide whether to punish violators by only fining them,” said Mohseni-Ejei.

(Writing by Ramin Mostafavi; Editing by Janet Lawrence)

Iran hangs six drug traffickers – media

Iran hanged six convicted drug traffickers in a prison west of Tehran on Saturday, the semi-official Fars News Agency reported.

Murder, adultery, rape, armed robbery, drug trafficking and apostasy are all punishable by death under Iranian Sharia law practised since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

Amnesty International says Iran had the second highest number of executions in 2009 after China, adding that about a third of its 388 executions took place in eight weeks of turmoil following a disputed June presidential election.

Those put to death on Saturday in the city of Karaj were sentenced for carrying and trafficking drugs including heroin and opium, Fars reported, citing the judiciary.

One of the men, Abbas Gravand, was found guilty of possessing 386 grams of heroin. Another, Saeed Mikaeli, was sentenced for possessing and selling 422 grams of crack.

Iran is a key transit route for narcotics smuggled from neighbouring Afghanistan, which produces more than 90 percent of the world’s supply of opium, to the West and elsewhere. Opium is used to make heroin.

Last year, Iran’s police chief, Esmail Ahmadi-Moghaddam, said about 130,000 people in the country of 70 million become addicted to drugs each year.

The Iranian judiciary is stepping up its fight against the drugs trade but a large part of the “narcotics mafia” is based outside the country, he added.

In March, Iranian media said five men convicted of various crimes including drug smuggling and rape were put to death in the southeastern province of Kerman.

Iran’s human rights record is often criticized by the West. Tehran rejects claims it is violating human rights and accuses the West of double standards and hypocrisy.

(Writing by Fredrik Dahl; editing by )

Now, unwed Malaysian couple to be whipped for trying to have car sex

Shah Alam (Malaysia), Sep. 18 (ANI): Following the whipping episode of the Malaysian model who was sentenced for drinking beer, an unmarried couple is now being subjected to the controversial canning sentence under the country’s Sharia law for trying to have sex.

Mohammad Shahrin Abd Majid, 29, and his lover Nadiah Najat Hussin, 24, pleaded guilty to attempting to have sex in a car, were fined 5,000 ringgits or 12 months’ jail and ordered to be caned six times each, the New Strait Times Online reports.

Both Shahrin and Nadiah have paid the fine. On Wednesday, the Sharia High Court of Shah Alam granted a stay on the caning pending an appeal following an application by the couple’s counsel.

The Court has also advised both accused to marry as soon as possible.

The couple had claimed that they were to be engaged soon, and scheduled to be married in February next year.

“You are still young… after Hari Raya seek consent from both your parents to marry,” he said.

Shahrin and Nadiah would be sent to prison in order to receive the caning if their appeal gets dismissed.

Earlier, former Malaysian model Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarno hogged the international headlines when she was sentenced for canning under Sharia law for drinking beer at a nightclub. (ANI)

UK hate preacher demands Koran-bashing author’s trial under sharia court

London, Sep. 4 (ANI): British hate preacher Anjem Choudary has controversially demanded capital punishment for Koran-bashing author Sebastian Faulks if he is found guilty under sharia law.Mr Faulks was extremely naove for what he said and it could have some grave consequence for him. Someone like this needs to be assessed in an Islamic court of law and if he’s found guilty then there would be capital punishment,” the Daily Express quoted him, as saying.

“Just as we chopping the hand off a thief and stoning the adulterer, we have for the one who insults the Prophet the death penalty,” he added.

Last week, Faulks had attracted Muslim community’s wrath by describing Koran as “the rantings of a schizophrenic” and “very disappointing from a literary point of view”.

Faulks, the author of James Bond novel Devil May Care, had said that the words of Prophet Mohammed were “one-dimensional”, and had criticised the Koran for not telling stories, like the Old Testament.

Although Faulks has apologised for calling Koran the “rantings of a schizophrenic,” Islam4UK a radical group associated with Choudary posted an article on its website entitled, “Sebastian Faulks on a Death Wish?”May Allah punish the oppressors and deal with the slanderers,” it added.

Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens, of the Centre for Social Cohesion, said: “Choudary and his followers are seeking to impose their will on the population of this country through subversion and incitement to violence.

“The weakness of Choudary’s fascist ideology could not be better illustrated than by his inability to provide an intellectual response to criticism, instead resorting to veiled threats and intimidation.”

However, Faulks declined to comment. His spokeswoman said: “He apologises if his comments about the Koran have offended Muslims.” (ANI)

UK hate preacher converts 11-year-old Christian boy to Islam

London, June 29 (ANI): Britain’s controversial Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary has converted an 11-year-old Christian schoolboy to Islam at a road show.

A film shows Sean, 11, vowing to follow the religion by repeating words in Arabic.

Sean, whose face is obscured by a coat hood and has been blacked out, is coached through the ceremony by hate preacher Choudary.

Standing next to him, he says: “This young man here wants to become a Muslim. This is not the first time a young man has discovered the truth. Come forward to think about Islam.”

Choudary, a follower of exiled hate-preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed, recites words for him to repeat.

The ceremony was filmed at a demonstration by Choudary’s Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah group in Birmingham city centre earlier this month.

Choudary defended the boy’s “reversion” to Islam.

“The boy told us he wanted to become a Muslim and, of course, some ­people are intellectually more mature than they are physically. I don’t see there is any harm in this,” he said.

Choudary, 42, was one of the masterminds behind sick protests at the homecoming parade of British soldiers from Afghanistan in Luton back in March.

He branded British troops “murderers.”

The preacher also calls for fundamentalist Sharia law in Britain and warns of the dangers of eternal “hellfire” for non-Muslims. (ANI)

MQM rejects sharia-deal with Taliban

Karachi, Apr. 20 (ANI): Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) chief Altaf Hussain has rejected the sharia-deal between the Pakistan Government’s and the Taliban.

The Daily Times quoted Hussain, as saying that the Taliban’s Sharia law was based on violence, and urged people to unite against the menace of Talibansation.

Hussain also condemned a statement by Pak-Taliban chief Sufi Muhammad, that high courts and the Supreme Court are un-Islamic.

Addressing an ulema convention in Karachi by telephone from London, he said the MQM was not against sharia, but against the “sharia of the Taliban”.

He claimed the enforcement of the peace-deal was just the beginning of the Talibanisation of the country, adding innocent people were being punished on false accusations.

He said the time had come to choose between the Taliban and Pakistan. (ANI)

Stop using Quranic ringtones on mobile phones! decrees an Islamic seminary

You are asking for a religious trouble (fatwa), if you are Muslim, using verses (“aayats”) from the Koran as ringtones on your mobile phones! Ashraful Madaris, an Islamic seminary in Kanpur city of India, has issues a fatwa on using Quranic ringtones on mobile phones.

Ashraful Madaris has stated that it is a sin to use aayats (verses from the Quran) as ringtones and answer the phone calls during aayats. According to the Muslim organization, Muslims are prohibited to use ringtones from Quran on their mobile phones; Muslims are forbidden to mobile phones during aayats or prayers, as the acts degrade the Quran.

Ashraful Madaris has denounced the use of mobile phones with Quranic ringtones in toilets. The Islamic seminary has ruled that its sin to hear aayats in toilets. According to the Islamic seminary, the practice of keeping mobile phones on vibration mode while performing prayers is religiously unacceptable.

Ghyasuddin, a senior cleric with the Islamic group Jamia Ashraf-ul-Madaris has said, “Listening to aayats partially is anti-Islamic. This kind of action amounts to a gunah (sin).” According to Ghyasuddin, “If the phone rings and an aayat can be heard in the toilet, it is a sin.”

Fatwa is an Islamic legal decree issued by Islamic scholars having wide knowledge of the Sharia law. The recent fatwa on mobile phones issued by Ashraful Madaris is not the first one; such fatwa was also issued three years ago by India’s main Islamic seminary in Deoband, Darul Uloom, which directed the Muslims not to use Quranic aayaat (verses) as ring tones. The Islamic seminary Darul Uloom Deoband asked the Muslims not to download verses (Aayats) from the Koran as ringtones.

Mohammad Asumin Qazmi from Deoband seminary had said, The verses of Quran are sacred and cannot by any account be used for the purpose of entertainment. The matter has been raised many times in our meetings. So it was necessary to give a general instruction. There are occasions when the cell phone rings during prayer. On occasions, the phone holder would be at a place not considered sacred or congenial. We dont recite Quran verses at those places.

Muslim organization issues fatwa over mobile-phone etiquettes

According to reports, a panel of clerics of the Kanpur-based Muslim organization, Jamia Ashraf-ul-Madaris, has issued a ‘fatwa’ over etiquettes related to use of mobile phones.

As per the ‘fatwa’ – which is essentially an Islamic legal diktat laid down by staunch practitioners of the Sharia law -, it is a sin to use verses from the Koran as ring tones. In addition, the ruling from the organization said that answering calls in the middle of the aayat – a verse from the holy Koran – is also sinful. The decree argues that people answer calls midway through the aayat, leave the verse incomplete.

Elaborating on the decision, Ghyasuddin, a senior cleric of the organization, said: “Listening to aayats partially is anti-Islamic. This kind of action amounts to a gunah (sin).”

The panel has also restricted the followers of Islam from putting their cell-phones in the ‘vibrate’ mode while offering prayer services, and censuring their use in the bathroom. Briefing the Press Association, Ghyasuddin said: “If the phone rings and an aayat can be heard in the toilet, it is a sin.”

Ghyasuddin added that these kind of anti-Islamic practices leave a bad impression on the young generation.

‘Sharia doesn’t permit us to lay down arms,’: Muslim Khan

Islamabad, Apr. 15 (ANI): Pakistani’s Taliban will not lay down heir arms in a northwestern valley as part of a deal that ncluded the introduction of sharia law but will take their struggle’ to new areas, a militant spokesman said today.

‘Sharia doesn’t permit us to lay down arms,’ Muslim Khan said by elephone. ‘If a government, either in Pakistan or Afghanistan, ontinues anti-Muslim policies, it’s out of the question that aliban lay down their arms.’

Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari, under pressure from onservatives, signed a regulation on Monday imposing sharia law n the Swat valley to end Taliban violence.

The strategy of appeasement has alarmed US officials, while ritics say the government has demonstrated a lack of capacity nd will to fight the Taliban and al Qaeda.

According to Dawn, details of the deal have not been made public ut government officials backing the pact have said part of it as that militants would give up their arms.

But a Pakistani Taliban spokesman in the scenic valley, a one-ime tourist destination 125 km northwest of Islamabad, said they ould be keeping their guns.

He said “When we achieve our goal at one place, there are other reas where we need to struggle for it.”

He further said ‘the decisions of Qazi courts will not be allowed o be challenged in any other court of the country, including the upreme Court.’

Khan said militants would go to Afghanistan to fight US-led orces if Afghan Taliban called for help.

‘Our struggle is for a cause and that’s to enforce Allah’s rule n Allah’s land. We will send mujahideen to Afghanistan if they emand them,’ he said.

Earlier, Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan spokesman Muslim Khan has aid that their men would surrender arms only after they see haria enforced in Malakand division of the Sawt Valley, after NSM chief Sufi Muhammad has asked them to lay down arms after akistan President Asif Zardari approved the Nizam-e-Adl egulation.
“The Taliban should lay down weapons after the signing of the haria regulation by the president,” Sufi said while talking to eporters.
“We will do that when the Sharia is enforced and we see changes n the ground,” the Daily Times quoted TTP spokesman Muslim Khan, s saying.
“When we are satisfied with the practical steps, we will lay down eapons,” he said. He asked the Taliban to avoid displaying eapons in public in major towns of the division.
But Sufi said the Taliban should now “play their role in evelopment of the people and the area. Their demand for the mposition of sharia has been met and carrying weapons has no ogic now.”

However, the new qazi courts would not hear cases against the aliban, the TNSM chief said. “We intend to bury the past,” Sufi aid. (ANI)

Pak Taliban militants’ accused of brutal killings will enjoy immunity: Sufi

Islamabad, Apr 15 (ANI): Tehrik-i-Nifaz-i-Shariat-i-Muhammadi chief Sufi Mohammad has interpreted the Nizam-i-Adl regulation in an audacious manner, by asserting that the law would protect Pakistan Taliban militants accused of brutal killings and burning scores of schools for girls in the name of Islam from prosecution.

Asked on Tuesday in a television interview whether the new courts would hear complaints from Swat residents about Mullah Fazlullah or his followers, Sufi Mohammad said they could not.

“We intend to bury the past. These things will be left behind and we will go for a new life in peace,” the TNSM chief told a private television channel.

Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan spokesman Muslim Khan said the militants would cooperate if the Sharia law is quickly implemented. “The world will see how much peace and prosperity comes to this region,” he said.

Sufi Mohammad said his followers would tour all districts of Malakand, including Buner, to “ensure peace.” He also said the courts would interpret civil rights according to Islamic strictures.

“Women will have full protection and rights under Sharia. They will live a better life, but behind the veil,” the Dawn quoted him, as saying.

Meanwhile, the Swat Taliban have ‘banned’ display of weapons in bazaars, urban areas and even their Imamdheri centre, saying there is no need of taking up arms if Sharia is enforced in letter and spirit.

The decision was taken on an appeal of Tehrik-i-Nifaz-i-Shariat Muhammadi chief Sufi Mohammad, Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan told journalists.

He said the Taliban had achieved their goal and they were ready to cooperate for quick implementation of the Nizam-i-Adl regulation.

He expressed the hope that the law would soon be implemented in letter and spirit. (ANI)

Qazi courts start functioning in NWFP’s Malakand region

Islamabad, Apr.14 (ANI): Qazi courts have started functioning with full authority following the National Assembly’s nod to implement the sharia law in the Malakand division, The News reports.

The sharia courts were already functioning in Barrikot, Kabal, Matta, Khawazakhel, Bahrain and Babuzai tehsils of Swat from March with limited authority, but after the approval of Nizam-e-Adl regulation they now have full authority to decide over different matters.

The National Assembly had gave its green signal to a resolution asking President Asif Ali Zardari to sign the sharia regulation to be implemented in the Malakand division of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) according to the peace accord inked between the NWFP government and the Tehreek Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi (TNSM).

Following the National Assembly’s nod, Zardari also signed the sharia law deal to be implemented in NWFP’s Swat region. (ANI)

Zardari signs sharia deal following National Assembly’s green signal

Islamabad, Apr.14 (ANI): Following the National Assembly’s nod, Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari has signed the sharia law deal which is to be implemented in the North West Frontier Province’s Swat region.

“Yes, the president has signed the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation before leaving for Dubai on a two-day visit,” The Daily Times quoted presidential spokesman Farhatullah Babar, as saying.

The National Assembly also gave its green signal to a resolution asking Zardari to sign the sharia regulation to be implemented in the Malakand division of the province according to the peace accord inked between the NWFP government and the Tehreek Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi (TNSM).

Addressing the members of the National Assembly after putting the regulation before the house, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani said the regulation had been placed before the house to build a broad national consensus and establish the supremacy of parliament.

Gilani said he had also discussed the issue with the NWFP government and TNSM, and both were of the view that the regulation should be passed as soon as possible.

“I have also talked to Asfandyar Wali Khan and Fazlur Rehman and both recommended immediate passing of the resolution,” Gilani said.

Meanwhile, both the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the TNSM have welcomed parliament’s move.

Spokesperson of the Taliban’s Swat chapter Muslim Khan said being the assembly of a Muslim country it was absolutely correct to pass the resolution.

“The endorsement of Nizam-e-Adl by parliament was the result of efforts by Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and the ANP,” TNSM chief Sufi Muhammad said.

Some political parties, however, have expressed their discontent over the issue.

Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) leader Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan refused to comment on the deal terming it as a ‘sensitive issue.’

Khan accused the government of dragging the parliament in the issue to avoid pressuer from the international community.

The Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) said it does not support Taliban’s ‘forced sharia.’

MQM chief Altaf Hussain said Talibanisation and religious extremists were defaming Pakistan. (ANI)

Pak MNA’s in catch-22 situation over sharia regulation

Islamabad, Apr.13 (ANI): Several members of the Pakistan Parliament who do not endorse the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation are worried, as they are unable to decide whether to speak against the deal or keep a low profile on the issue.

With President Asif Ali Zardari sending the sharia regulation bill to Prime Minister Gilani to table it before Parliament for a discussion, the members are caught in a catch 22 situation.

Parliamentarians fear a Taliban repercussion if they go against imposing the sharia law in the North West Frontier Province (NWFP).

“Even FATA and ANP lawmakers adopt a discreet approach while speaking against Taliban publicly and by criticising Nizam-e-Adl Regulation in the Lower House because in the presence of swift news reporting networks one cannot put his life at stake”, The Nation quoted a Pakistan Peoples’ Party leader, as saying.

Leaders believe that most of the MNA’s would keep mum on the issue during the debate due to security and religious issues.

“I am not very hopeful with the upcoming debate on Nizam-e-Adl Regulation 2009 in the Parliament,” said a PML-Q Parliamentarian Sheikh Waqas Akram.

They also viewed that the bill would be passed by Parliament without much opposition.

“The draft would easily be passed through the Parliament in minimum span of time because there is no other way to resolve the crisis.” an ANP MNA from Swat Muzafer-ul-Mulk said. (ANI)

Zardari throws Taliban’s sharia law deal at Gilani, Sharif camp

Islamabad, Apr.13 (ANI): Deciding to play safe on the issue of signing a deal with the Taliban to impose a sharia law in the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of the country, Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari has sent the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation, 2009 to Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani to table it before Parliament.

Zardari’s move clearly suggests that he alone does not want to be held responsible for the controversial deal with the banned Taliban. If the deal backfires, it will be Parliament that would have to take responsibility for it.

Zardari’s move has surprised Gilani and other top political leaders of the country.

Political leaders are confused on what to do regarding the issue.

The Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) and Pakistan Muslim League (Quaid) are still undecided whether to support the act or oppose it.

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Dr Babar Awan was particularly against Zardari signing the deal, and it was he who advised him to table the regulation before Parliament approval or rejection.

According to The News, Awan wanted Nawaz Sharif to sign the deal so that in future neither he nor his party could criticize the Pakistan Peoples’ Party for the move.

Tabling the regulation before Parliament is a significant political step taken by the President, as his close aides believe that if the PML-N backs the deal in parliament, it would lose sympathy and support in Washington and London.

“Let’s see how the US now convince their new friend Nawaz Sharif not to sign the deal in parliament,” a Zardari’s aide argued. (ANI)

Pak-Taliban peace deal in Swat in jeopardy

A peace deal between Taliban and authorities in Pakistan’s restive Swat valley appeared headed for a collapse on Thursday as a frustrated cleric, who brokered the ceasefire accord, said he will quit the region to protest the government’s failure to impose strict Islamic law or sharia.

Sufi Muhammad, the father-in-law of Maulana Fazlullah who is the Taliban’s chief in Swat, said that he was leaving the picturesque region in “protest” and claimed that there cannot be peace in Swat without enforcement of the strict Sharia law.

“I am ending my peace camp in Swat. From now on President (Asif Ali) Zardari will be responsible for any situation in Swat,” Muhammad, founder of Tehrik-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi (TNSM) which facilitated the peace deal between the Taliban and government, told reporters in Swat.

Zardari has said that he will not allow enforcement of the Islamic law in Swat till peace is restored completely.

With the deal, the area would come under sharia law, which — under the Taliban’s strict interpretation – would prevent women from even being seen in public without their husbands or fathers.

Imposition of Islamic law is one of the main demands of the Taliban, who reached the peace deal with the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) government in February, ending 18 months of violence in the region that left hundreds of people dead.

Iran hangs three for 2008 mosque bombing

Tehran – Iran Friday hanged three people convicted of being involved in a bomb explosion in a mosque in the southern city of Shiraz in 2008, Iranian media reported. Mohsen Eslamian, Ali-Asghar Pashtar and Rouzbeh Yahyazadeh – all members of Tondar, a previously unknown terror group – had been arrested last year and convicted by a revolutionary court, state-run IRIB television reported.

Fourteen people were killed and about 200 injured in a bomb explosion during a speech by a local cleric in a Shiraz mosque in April last year.

An appeals court upheld the verdict by Tehran’s revolutionary court which found all three guilty and convicted them to death, the station reported on its website.

Under Iran’s sharia law armed robbery, murder, adultery, drug smuggling and involvement in “terrorist acts” are punishable by death.

Karzai to review controversial new rape law

Kabul, Apr.4 (ANI): Facing strong criticism from the international community over his sanction of a new law that allows men to rape their wives legally, Afghanistan’s President Hamid Karzai has said he would order a review of it and possibly send back to parliament if it was found that women’s rights are being violated.

According to the Daily Express, Karzai said he had ordered the Justice Ministry to review the law and if anything in it contravened the country’s constitution or sharia law “measures will be taken”.

The legislation is intended to regulate family life inside Afghanistan’s shiite community. But the United Nations Development Fund for Women said it “legalises the rape of a wife by her husband”.

The United States has urged Karzai to review the law and Karzai said he had spoken to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about it.

One of the law’s most controversial articles stipulates the wife “is bound to preen for her husband as and when he desires”.

“As long as the husband is not travelling, he has the right to have sexual intercourse with his wife every fourth night,” Article 132 of the law says.

“Unless the wife is ill or has any kind of illness that intercourse could aggravate, the wife is bound to give a positive response to the sexual desires of her husband.”

One provision also appears to protect the woman’s right to sex inside marriage saying the “man should not avoid having sexual relations with his wife longer than once every four months”.

Critics say Mr Karzai signed the legislation in the past month only for political gains several months before the country’s presidential election. (ANI)

Sufi Muhammad wants Islamic courts in Swat by March 15

Peshawar, Mar 2 (ANI): Maulana Sufi Muhammad, the chief of a banned group who is instrumental in propagating peace in troubled Swat Valley, has asked the government to set up Islamic courts in Malakand, a division in northwestern Pakistan by March 15.

Speaking at a news conference in Mingora on Sunday, the main city in the Malakand division, Muhammad urged the government and Taliban fighters to free each other’s prisoners by March 15.

Muhammad, who signed an agreement to establish Sharia courts with the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) government last month, said he would set up protest camps if the courts were not put in place.

“Any side, which will violate the peace agreement, will be considered as responsible,” Xinhua quoted the head of the outfit “Tehreek-e-Nifaz-e-Shariah-e-Muhammadi”, as saying.

Muhammad and NWFP officials struck a deal to end two-years of violence. Under the agreement, the government has agreed to implement Islamic laws in Malakand, including the war-torn Swat valley.

Taliban fighters in Swat announced ceasefire after the agreement and the government also declared ceasefire.

The cleric also said armed patrol by either side would not be allowed after March 1, and anybody who violated the truce would be charged and punished in line with the sharia law. (ANI)

Pak critics says new Islamic law in Swat Valley will encourage insurgents

Peshawar, Feb.17 (ANI): Pakistani critics of the NWFP Government-Pakistan Taliban deal to introduce a new sharia law in the Swat Valley, have claimed that this a dangerous concession to extremist insurgents who have terrified inhabitants of the valley for months.

According to a report in the Washington Post, the bombing of girls’ schools, beheading of policemen, whipping criminals in public squares and assassinating Awami National Party activists is not acceptable to many of these critics.

They fear that this deal might spur the insurgents to push harder for the imposition of Islamic law in other areas, taking advantage of a promise by the Pakistani army to pull back from the surrounding area if peace is restored.

The Pakistan Government, on the other hand, is desperate to restore peace to a Taliban-infested valley once known as the “Switzerland of Pakistan,”.

In announcing the agreement, Pakistani officials asserted that the adoption of Sharia law would bring swift and fair justice to the Swat Valley, where people have long complained of legal corruption and delays. They said the new system would have “nothing in common” with the draconian rule of the Taliban militia that ran Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001, during which thieves’ hands were amputated and adulterers were stoned to death.

Militant leaders in the scenic Swat Valley, in a gesture of good faith, said they would observe a 10-day cease-fire while the new system is implemented. The Pakistani army said it would suspend operations in the area, and there were anecdotal reports of celebratory gunfire and crowds returning to once-deserted streets.

President Asif Ali Zardari has approved the new Sharia law plan for Malakand Agency, the large district in the North-West Frontier Province that includes Swat, after some initial hesitation and wording changes.

Leaders of the Awami National Party here said they also supported the agreement even though their own views are more secular and they have been targeted by insurgent attacks.

They said the government does not have sufficient force to defeat the Taliban and foreign fighters based in the autonomous tribal areas along the Afghan border.

So, they said, it needs to negotiate with local militant groups in nearby areas like Swat to isolate the renegade hardliners in the tribal sanctuaries. (ANI)