Spill puts Obama’s oil fund chief on hostile turf

Alabama (Reuters) – The man who acquired a solid gold reputation for fixing sticky situations for the U.S. government is facing one of his toughest challenges yet: running BP Plc’s $20 billion compensation fund.

Kenneth Feinberg, lawyer extraordinaire, was in charge of compensating victims’ families after the September 11, 2001 attacks and presided over executive pay at bailed-out Wall Street firms.

But the job President Barack Obama has asked him to do — deciding who will be compensated from BP’s catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico — is placing Feinberg in hostile territory where residents are still reeling from the federal government’s bungled response to Hurricane Katrina.

Many areas in Louisiana and Mississippi never recovered from the 2005 hurricane. Buildings are gutted. Broken boats lie in marshes.

Now many of the same residents who were left to fend for themselves after Katrina are seeing their fishing and tourism industries fall apart from the oil spill.

“Feinberg is full of baloney. He is a lawyer and that is how lawyers talk. I do not believe a word he says,” Delane Seaman said after attending one of Feinberg’s town hall meetings in Bayou La Batre on Sunday.

“BP is telling us we will be compensated for 100 percent loss of our oyster processing business, too. It will not happen,” Seaman said.

‘I AM YOUR LAWYER’

In Bayou La Batre, a small fishing community in south Alabama, Feinberg convened an early-morning session on Saturday to listen to residents’ concerns and answer questions on the claims process.

“I learned today the depth of frustration in people here on the coast,” a visibly-tired looking Feinberg said. “I am your lawyer. I do not work for BP. I do not work for the White House. I work and answer to the residents of the Gulf.”

Feinberg’s compensation for running the fund — which has not been disclosed — is being paid by BP.

BP’s blown-out well is capped. The energy giant had been expected to permanently stop the leak by mid-August, but a storm in the region slowed efforts.

Thousands of fishermen, oyster processors and other seafood industry workers have lost work because of the oil spill.

Feinberg must decide how much they get paid as well as how to compensate businesses related to the fishing and tourism industries and whether real estate brokers and bankers should be included.

As of mid-July $201 million was dispensed to workers and businesses in the region from the fund that so far has been run by BP. Feinberg expects to assume complete control of the fund by August 10.

He has said claims can be filed over lost wages and profits, business interruption as well as personal injuries.

Coastal tourism from Louisiana to Miami accounts for $100 billion per year, according to the New Orleans Metropolitan Convention and Visitors Bureau. The fishing industry accounts for $2.4 billion a year in Louisiana.

If most of the waters remain closed, the fishing industry could be wiped out. Tourism losses are just as dire. One study suggests that the tourism industry in the Gulf of Mexico could lose $22.7 billion in revenues over the next three years.

DEEP ANGER

In Venice, Louisiana, home to a popular North American fishing destination, workers had little faith in the Obama administration and Feinberg.

“Look at what happened with Katrina,” said Bill Butler, co-owner of the Venice Marina, which was ravaged by the 2005 hurricane.

Butler’s marina has been rebuilt. But the oil spill has transformed it from a haven for commercial and sports fishing to a staging area for the cleanup.

In the fishing town of Lafitte, Louisiana, locals cast sideways glances at each other when asked about Feinberg and refused to comment.

Instead they talked about help they had received from BP, which residents say has hired a good bulk of the small community. “Overall there is trust in BP,” said Lafitte resident Barbara Martin. “At least they’ve done more than the federal government.”

Residents in Mississippi and Alabama were similarly dubious about the fund’s chief.

“Feinberg says he is thinking about some issues but I just want to know who is paying him. That is where the truth will be concerning the fairness of claims being paid,” said Wu Lin, an out of work fisherman from Biloxi, Mississippi.

Another Biloxi resident, Curtis Fournier, said: “Can I trust him? He is a lawyer. What do you think?”

(Younglai reported from Venice, Louisiana, editing by Chris Baltimore and Vicki Allen)

Suicide bomber kills four civilians in Kabul

(Reuters) – A suicide bomber killed four civilians in an attack apparently aimed at a convoy of foreign forces on Sunday, security sources said.

The attack happened opposite a clinic on a road often used by foreign troops, one said, adding four more civilians were wounded.

There were no immediate word about casualties among the foreign forces, he said. The site of the attack was cordoned off.

A spokesman for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said they were aware of the incident but had no details immediately.

The blast took place just two days before dozens of foreign ministers — including U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and Secretary of state Hillary Clinton — were due in the capital for an international conference of Afghanistan’s future.

Some 150,000 foreign troops are squared off against a Taliban insurgency at its strongest since the hardline Islamists were overthrown by a U.S.-led force in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

(Reporting by Sayed Salahuddin; Editing by David Fox)

Pay czar Feinberg turns from bankers to BP

(Reuters) – As U.S. public outrage turns from banker pay to the massive BP oil spill, the government is again calling in a man with a reputation for dealing with sticky financial situations — Kenneth Feinberg.

Green Business | Barack Obama | Gulf Oil Spill

Feinberg gained national attention when dispensing hundreds of millions of dollars to victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks. His latest role will be to oversee a $20 billion special fund that BP Plc has agreed to set up to pay damage claims from the spill.

The new role comes as his responsibilities as the Obama administration’s pay czar diminish.

Feinberg, an arbitration lawyer, was brought in as “special master” for compensation in June 2009 as public anger simmered over big bonuses awarded at taxpayer bailed-out firms like American International Group.

Feinberg, who has a booming voice and a flair for the dramatic, has navigated that minefield well, by most accounts.

He has been hailed for soothing the egos of Wall Street executives clutching on to big paychecks, while still looking tough to a general public shocked by massive payouts to firms on a government lifeline.

One statistic cited by his admirers to show his success — 84 percent of the top earners at bailed-out firms under Feinberg’s scrutiny have stayed with the companies, as of March.

Feinberg is not without his detractors. Bank of America blasted his pay rulings last year, saying they were causing other firms to poach its workers. Anastasia Kelly quit her job as AIG’s general counsel in protest over pay curbs Feinberg imposed.

THE NEXT CHALLENGE

But the scope of Feinberg’s high-profile pay czar job has lessened as more big firms have paid back taxpayers. As he takes on his new role, Feinberg still has to issue in the comings weeks his findings from his review of past compensation at 419 firms that received bailout funds, including JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs.

Feinberg’s latest challenge takes him away from Wall Street and back to Main Street anguish.

Millions of gallons of oil have gushed into the Gulf of Mexico since an April 20 explosion of an offshore rig killed 11 workers and ruptured a BP well.

The spill, the biggest in U.S. history, has soiled 120 miles of U.S. coastline, imperiled multibillion-dollar fishing and tourism industries, and killed birds, sea turtles and dolphins.

It has also turned on the tap for what is certain to be a long outpouring of damages claims. The escrow fund agreed to by the Obama administration and BP follows complaints from Gulf Coast residents that the claims process was too long and complicated and that BP was paying out too little money.

Feinberg is no stranger to high-stakes emotions and payouts. He was adept in handling the September 11th victims’ fund and the fund for victims of the 2007 shootings at Virginia Tech, according to people who worked with him.

When news of Feinberg’s new role hit on Wednesday, New York Senator Charles Schumer was quick to sing his praises.

“The victims can be confident that real help is on the way with someone as fair, diligent and sympathetic as Ken Feinberg running this fund,” Schumer said in a statement. “I believe when Feinberg completes his mission here, the people in the Gulf will feel the same way.”

Feinberg declined to comment.

Feinberg, the son of a tire merchant, has been on the Washington scene for decades.

Feinberg, who is 64, has described himself as an “average student at rough-and-tumble Brockton High School” in Massachusetts, but excelled at the University of Massachusetts.

After college, Feinberg entertained the idea of pursuing an acting career. His father told him to play Hamlet in front of juries instead. He attended law school at New York University.

Despite his regular forays into high-profile work for the government, he maintains his private law practice, Feinberg Rozen LLP, located a couple of blocks from the White House.

(Additional reporting by Jeff Mason, Editing by Kristin Roberts and Frances Kerry)

Obama pick for deputy attorney general comes under fire

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama’s nominee for deputy attorney general on Tuesday faced Republican ire for how the administration has been handling terrorism prosecutions and giving suspects U.S. legal rights.

Politics

The Senate Judiciary Committee reviewed the nomination of James Cole, 58, to be deputy attorney general at a crucial time as the administration reconsiders how to prosecute the accused plotters of the September 11, 2001, attacks and it investigates the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Cole tried to fend off Republican questions about the use of military commissions for terrorism suspects and when they should be given legal rights such as the ability to remain silent under questioning and be given a defense lawyer.

Senator Jeff Sessions, the committee’s top Republican, seized on an opinion piece Cole wrote in 2002 that raised concerns about the Bush administration’s handling of the prosecution of terrorism suspects.

“It was a position directly critical of the concept of military commissions,” Sessions told Cole. “Now are you saying that you left something out you’d like to put in that op-ed, and that if you draw up a good military commission, you don’t think it undermines the Constitution of the United States?”

Cole said there were constitutional questions about the initial military commissions that were set up and ultimately struck down by the Supreme Court. He said they have since been improved and can be used.

Cole repeated the administration’s support for using both military and criminal trials for prosecuting terrorism suspects. “We need all of the tools,” he told lawmakers.

Attorney General Eric Holder’s plan to prosecute the plotters of the September 11 attacks in a criminal court in the heart of Manhattan was sidelined after bipartisan concerns emerged about security and whether they should be tried in special military courts instead.

The White House put that effort on hold while officials re-evaluate whether it was the right venue and location for the trials but they have not set a deadline for a decision.

Republicans also focused on a controversy that erupted after the bombing attempt of a U.S. airliner on Christmas last year in which the suspect was given legal rights, known as Miranda rights, by authorities hours after being arrested.

Republican Senator John Cornyn asked why a suspected terrorist would be read Miranda rights when it was more important to get information about his travels, associations and knowledge of terror networks.

Cole replied that the right to remain silent and to have a lawyer were ingrained in the U.S. Constitution and while there are exceptions in cases where a threat may still be imminent, such rights did not always stop suspects from talking.

“My experience frankly in criminal law for 30 years is that frequently after being given Miranda warnings and after being given a lawyer, defendants and people who are being detained talk and they talk a lot,” he said.

Cole agreed to work with lawmakers on an effort by the administration to clarify how legal rights for terrorism suspects should be administered.

Cole also was asked about the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and he repeated statements by Obama and Holder that BP Plc would be held liable to pay for the damage and cleanup.

(Reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky; Editing by Bill Trott)

Afghanistan not prepared to go 10 years back, says Afghan MP

Kabul, June 6(ANI): Afghanistan’s Member of Parliament, Fawzia Kofi, has said that the nation or the Hamid Karzai-led Government is not ready to accept any path which threaten to throw the country back in time.

Kofi’s comments came after the Afghan’s Consultative Peace Jirga outlined a path for Karzai to negotiate with the Taliban, which included removal of senior Taliban figures from a United Nations blacklist and strengthening of Islamic law.

“This nation is not prepared to go 10 years back,” The Globe and Mail quoted Kofi, as saying.

“The delegates showed that they have already been influenced by Talibanization, making sure the insurgents’ ideology is included in these proposals. We cannot offer impunity to these people. They need to be equal before the law,” she added.

The jirga advised the government to act “immediately” on seeking the removal of the names of militant leaders from a blacklist drawn up by the UN Security Council in response to the September 11, 2001, attacks on the US.

The list designated Taliban and Al-Qaeda leaders, who were then based in Afghanistan, as terrorists, and helped to provide a UN-sanctioned justification for the US-led invasion of the country in November 2001. (ANI)

Q+A: Who was al Qaeda’s operations chief Sa’id al-Masri?

(Reuters) – Al Qaeda’s operations chief and third-in-command, Sheikh Sai’d al-Masri, is believed to have been killed in a U.S. missile strike in Pakistan last month, U.S. and Pakistani officials said.

World

Al Qaeda has confirmed the death of Masri, who is also known as Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, in a statement on an Islamist website but gave no details.

U.S. and Pakistani intelligence officials believe Masri was killed, along with members of his family, in a strike by a pilotless CIA-operated drone in tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan in late May.

Following are some facts about him.

WHO IS SAI’D AL-MASRI?

He was born on December 17, 1955, in Egypt and became a militant Islamist in his youth, spending three years in prison.

Masri was a founding member of al Qaeda number two Ayman al-Zawahiri’s branch of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, one of the original groups that merged to form al Qaeda. Following the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in 1981, Masri was implicated in the killing along with Zawahiri and others, and they spent time in jail together.

He left Egypt for Afghanistan in 1988 and was subsequently convicted in absentia for militant offences in several trials in Egypt, and was sentenced to both life imprisonment and death.

Masri accompanied Osama bin Laden from Afghanistan to Sudan in 1991. While there he served as an accountant for bin Laden’s Sudan-based businesses before returning to Afghanistan with bin Laden in 1996.

Masri is reported to have supplied funding for Mohammed Atta, the leader of the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

WHAT WAS HIS ROLE IN AL QAEDA?

Masri was one of al Qaeda’s most important and trusted leaders. He was al Qaeda’s leader in Afghanistan and in what the group refers to as the Khorasan, a region encompassing large areas of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Iran.

The Khorasan is considered by jihadists to be the place where they will inflict the first defeat against their enemies in the Muslim version of Armageddon.

He also served as a top propagandist for al Qaeda and the Taliban. Bespectacled Masri, wearing a white turban, often appeared on propaganda tapes with senior Taliban leaders.

As one of the founding members of al Qaeda in the late 1980s, Masri was a close associate of bin Laden. He also was a member of al Qaeda’s Shura Council, its core leadership forum.

Among Islamist groups, Masri was reputed to be a diplomatic personality who had good relations among local militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan. His appointment as the leader of Afghan operations in May 2007 was seen by experts as a bid by al Qaeda to boost its ties to local insurgents.

The U.S. September 11 Commission described Masri as the network’s “chief financial manager”. He was also believed to have opposed the September 11 attacks prior to their execution, but he remained loyal to al Qaeda and bin Laden.

HOW SIGNIFICANT IS HIS DEATH?

Security experts say his death would be a blow. Al Qaeda has suffered a steady erosion of its leadership and ability to mount attacks since the United States stepped up its campaign of missile strikes by unmanned aircraft in Pakistan’s tribal region.

His death could also hamper al Qaeda’s ability to raise and distribute funds because he was in charge of the group’s “bayt ul mal”, or treasury. Because of his seniority he will be difficult to replace, security experts say.

Masri, which means “the Egyptian”, was the most senior al Qaeda leader killed in Afghanistan since military commander Mohammad Atef died in a U.S. air strike on his home in Kabul in November 2001.

He was also the highest ranking al Qaeda operative to have been killed in Pakistan’s tribal belt this year. In 2008, Pakistani security officials had said he was killed in military clashes in the northwestern Bajaur tribal region but that was later proved incorrect.

WHAT DID HE SAY WHEN HE WAS ALIVE?

One of the few recognizable faces of al Qaeda, Masri issued warnings and threats to countries and leaders the group considers itself waging holy war, or jihad, against.

In an interview aired on Al Jazeera television in June 2009, Masri said al Qaeda would use Pakistan’s nuclear weapons in its fight against the United States if it were in a position to do so. When asked about the whereabouts of bin Laden and Zawahiri, he said they were “safe”.

In a video seen by Reuters in 2009, Masri warned India of more attacks like the 2008 operation in its financial capital Mumbai and said India’s economic interests would be targeted if it retaliated against Pakistan.

Masri also told Pakistan’s Geo television in an interview aired in 2008 that a suicide bomber who attacked the Danish embassy in Islamabad that year came from the Muslim holy city of Mecca in Saudi Arabia.

In a June 2009 audio message, Masri said militants were short of food, weapons and other supplies and appealed for funding. In a January 2010 message, he praised a December 30, 2009, attack at a U.S. base in Afghanistan in which a Jordanian double agent turned suicide bomber killed seven CIA officers.

(Additional reporting by William Maclean in LONDON; Editing by Chris Allbritton and Miral Fahmy)

Any U.S. attempt to kill Awlaki in Yemen unacceptable

(Reuters) – An assassination on Yemeni territory of a radical Muslim cleric wanted dead or alive by U.S. authorities would be unacceptable, the Yemeni prime minister said Sunday.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s National Security Council recently gave the CIA the green light to kill Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S.-Yemeni citizen whom they accuse of having links to al Qaeda and who is believed to be in hiding in southern Yemen.

“We will absolutely not accept that,” Prime Minister Ali Mohammed Megawar told Reuters in an interview.

“We are a sovereign country.”

According to the latest information, Awlaki was still in the southern Yemeni province of Shabwa, Megawar said.

U.S. authorities say Awlaki was added to the CIA’s hit list after he became “operational” in al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which claimed responsibility for a failed plot to blow up a U.S.-bound passenger plane on Christmas Day.

The Nigerian man accused in the attempted bombing met Awlaki while visiting Yemen, and the U.S.-born preacher also had contacts with a U.S. Army psychiatrist who shot dead 13 people at a U.S. Army base in November.

Yemen’s foreign minister said earlier this month that Yemen would not hand Awlaki over to Washington, but instead put him on trial if he is arrested.

After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the United States and Yemen joined forces to fight al Qaeda, and Washington has kept a close eye on the impoverished country, which borders the world’s top oil exporter Saudi Arabia.

Awlaki, whose father is a former minister in Yemen, traveled to the country in 2004, where he taught at a university before he was arrested and imprisoned in 2006 for suspected links to al Qaeda and involvement in attacks.

He was released in December 2007 because he said he had repented, but he was later charged again on similar counts and went into hiding.

Megawar said he disagreed with Yemen being described as a refuge for al Qaeda.

“Yemen is not a safe haven for terrorists. Yemen has al Qaeda, we recognize that … but they are spread out in different areas and are scared as a result of the strict crackdown by the government for all their actions,” he said.

“Yes, al Qaeda is present in Yemen, al Qaeda is a risk in Yemen, but there is exaggeration by the media,” he said.

Last week, a fugitive Saudi Arabian man who was detained for several years at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo until his release in 2006, was named as a senior member of Al Qaeda’s Yemen wing, according to a tape by the group.

Megawar said Othman Ahmed al-Ghamdi’s appointment as a senior operative was another development in the ongoing fight against militants in Yemen but added, “We have nothing to do with who comes and goes.”

(Editing by Myra MacDonald)

INTERVIEW-Any US attempt to kill Awlaki in Yemen unacceptable

* Yemen will not accept U.S. killing of Awlaki on territory

* Yemen “not a safe haven” for al Qaeda, threat exaggerated

By Raissa Kasolowsky

SANAA, May 30 (Reuters) – An assassination on Yemeni territory of a radical Muslim cleric wanted dead or alive by U.S. authorities would be unacceptable, the Yemeni prime minister said on Sunday.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s National Security Council recently gave the CIA the green light to kill Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S.-Yemeni citizen whom they accuse of having links to al Qaeda and who is believed to be in hiding in southern Yemen.

“We will absolutely not accept that,” Prime Minister Ali Mohammed Megawar told Reuters in an interview.

“We are a sovereign country.”

According to the latest information, Awlaki was still in the southern Yemeni province of Shabwa, Megawar said.

U.S. authorities say Awlaki was added to the CIA’s hit list after he became “operational” in al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which claimed responsibility for a failed plot to blow up a U.S.-bound passenger plane on Christmas Day.

The Nigerian man accused in the attempted bombing met Awlaki while visiting Yemen, and the U.S.-born preacher also had contacts with a U.S. Army psychiatrist who shot dead 13 people at a U.S. Army base in November.

Yemen’s foreign minister said earlier this month that Yemen would not hand Awlaki over to Washington, but instead put him on trial if he is arrested.

After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the United States and Yemen joined forces to fight al Qaeda, and Washington has kept a close eye on the impoverished country, which borders the world’s top oil exporter Saudi Arabia.

Awlaki, whose father is a former minister in Yemen, travelled to the country in 2004, where he taught at a university before he was arrested and imprisoned in 2006 for suspected links to al Qaeda and involvement in attacks.

He was released in December 2007 because he said he had repented, but he was later charged again on similar counts and went into hiding.

Megawar said he disagreed with Yemen being described as a refuge for al Qaeda.

“Yemen is not a safe haven for terrorists. Yemen has al Qaeda, we recognise that … but they are spread out in different areas and are scared as a result of the strict crackdown by the government for all their actions”, he said.

“Yes, al Qaeda is present in Yemen, al Qaeda is a risk in Yemen, but there is exaggeration by the media,” he said.

Last week, a fugitive Saudi Arabian man who was detained for several years at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo until his release in 2006, was named as a senior member of Al Qaeda’s Yemen wing, according to a tape by the group. [ID:nLDE64R043]

Megawar said Othman Ahmed al-Ghamdi’s appointment as a senior operative was another development in the ongoing fight against militants in Yemen but added, “We have nothing to do with who comes and goes.” (Editing by Myra MacDonald)

Trader’s `b’ for `m’ error behind huge Dow Jones share plunge

New York, May 7 (ANI): A trade error is believed to have been behind the Dow Jones Industries average and shares in Procter and Gamble and Accenture dropping overnight.

Rumours swirled around the market that a trader had reportedly entered a “b” for billion instead of an “m” for million in a trade involving Procter and Gamble, CNBC reported, citing several sources.

Management consulting powerhouse Accenture also traded at around 41.78 dollars a share when it suddenly plunged to a cent a share. In the next few minutes the share recovered to end the overnight session at 41.09 dollars.

This set off a chain of trades that led to the largest intra-day plunge in the history of the Dow Jones Industrials average.

Shares in Procter and Gamble fell from 61.56 dollars a share to 39.37 dollars a share and then quickly bounced back again.

Procter and Gamble later confirmed the sudden drop in its share price was an error, MarketWatch reports.

According to news.com.au, there was a trading error known as the “fat finger problem” that occurred at a major investment bank, and it was combined with fears over the Greek debt crisis to leave the US market reeling.

The crash began shortly before 2.25 p.m. local time, when in a white-knuckle 20 minutes America”s top 30 firms saw their share prices dive 998.5 points, almost 9 per cent, wiping out billions in market value.

The drop eclipsed even the crashes seen when markets reopened after September 11, 2001 and in the wake of the Lehman Brothers collapse.

By closing time the major US stock market indexes had lost about 3 per cent.

The effect of the drop was felt in Australia, with the local market opening about 3 per cent lower.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the US Securities and Exchange Commission said in a joint statement after trading closed that they were working closely with other financial regulators and exchanges “to review the unusual trading activity.”

The regulators said they would make the findings of their review public. (ANI)

Taliban leader thought dead vows revenge

The leader of the Pakistani Taliban, reported killed in a CIA drone aircraft attack in January, has appeared in internet videos threatening revenge suicide strikes in the United States.

Hakimullah Mehsud was widely believed to have been killed by a US missile strike in South Waziristan in January, but on April 29 Pakistani intelligence officials said they believed he was alive.

He has now posted warnings on on the Internet, vowing revenge against the US.

The warning comes shortly after the Taliban Movement of Pakistan (TMP) said it was responsible for an attempted car bomb attack in New York’s Times Square on Saturday evening.

“The time is very near when our Fedayeen (fighters prepared to sacrifice themselves) will attack the American states in their major cities,” Mehsud said, adding the video was recorded on April 4, 2010.

“Our Fedayeen have penetrated the terrorist America. We will give extremely painful blows to the fanatic America.”

The TMP has focused on fighting the Islamabad government and has never proved capable of carrying out overseas attacks.

But the possibility that the TMP may have global aspirations may worry the US because of the group’s ties with Al Qaeda, which carried out the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York and Washington.

The TMP has proven resilient despite a series of Pakistani army offensives in the north-west, a global militant hub.

It has carried out suicide attacks on a wide range of targets, from military and police facilities to crowded markets.

Meanwhile, Pakistani security forces have killed 16 militants in clashes in the north-western lawless regions, government officials said.

The clashes broke out near the Afghanistan border after militants ambushed a security post and patrol in Orakzai and Bajaur, respectively.

Osama Bin Laden grossly underestimated U.S. retaliation to 9/11: Ex-associate

Washington, Apr 28(ANI): A former Osama bin Laden associate has said that the Al-Qaeda leader did not expect the United States to strike back as hard as it has following the September 11, 2001 attacks.

“What happened after September 11 was beyond their imagination,” The New York Post quoted Noman Benotman, who was the head of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group in 2000, as having told the WTOP Radio.

Benotman said Al-Qaeda was overly confident based on the U.S. response to the attacks carried out by the group on their embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998.

“I’m 100 percent sure they had no clue about what was going to happen,” he added.

Meanwhile, a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) official also backed Bentoman’s claims.

“Several captured terrorists have said publicly that Al-Qaeda never expected the towers to fall. Their goal was to frighten people and impact the U.S. economy, so they really didn”t plan for the massive response the U.S. launched,” the official said.

On that morning of September 11, 19 Al-Qaeda terrorists had hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners.

The hijackers intentionally crashed two of the airliners into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, killing everyone on board and many others working in the buildings. Both buildings collapsed within two hours, destroying nearby buildings and damaging others.

The hijackers crashed a third airliner into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, while the fourth plane crashed into a field near Shanksville in rural Pennsylvania after some of its passengers and flight crew attempted to retake control of the plane.

At least 2,800 people, including the 19 hijackers were killed in the attacks, where overwhelming majority of casualties were civilians.

The U.S. responded to the attacks by launching the ‘War on Terrorism’, and invaded Afghanistan to depose the Taliban, who had harbored Al-Qaeda terrorists.

Bin Laden and fellow Al-Qaeda leaders are believed to be hiding near the border of Afghanistan and Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas. (ANI)

Osama tried to watch 9/11 bombings live on TV

London, Apr 16(ANI): Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden’s former bodyguard has revealed that the militant leader had tried and failed to set up a satellite TV link-up from his Afghan hideout to watch the 9/11 terror attacks as they happened.

Nasser al-Bahri said his former master had requested a satellite dish to be installed in his hideout in Kandahar.

“He asked for satellite TV to be able to follow the bombing,” The Telegraph quoted al-Bahri, as saying.

However, due to the rugged, mountainous terrain, he was not able to get a signal and so failed to view the planes striking the twin towers of the World Trade Centre in New York.

He further claims that the Al-Qaeda leader is still alive, and he might be under tribal protection in Waziristan.

“His death, even if it was not announced immediately for internal reasons, would end up being known in jihadist circles and on the Internet,” al-Bahri said.

“(The tribes’) allegiance is more religious than tribal, which is a bonus for bin Laden, who built them roads and houses twenty years ago,” he added.

On September 11, 2001, Al-Qaeda terrorists had intentionally hijacked and crashed two planes into the twin towers, killing everyone on board and many others working in the buildings.

Both buildings collapsed within two hours, destroying nearby buildings and damaging others.

The hijackers crashed a third airliner into the Pentagon, just outside Washington D.C. fourth plane crashed into a field near Shanksville in rural Pennsylvania after some of its passengers and flight crew attempted to retake control of the plane, which the hijackers had redirected toward Washington D.C.

There were no survivors from any of the flights, and 2,973 people died as a result of the attacks, including nationals of over 70 countries. (ANI)

Osama tried to watch 9/11 bombings live on TV

London, Apr 16(ANI): Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden’s former bodyguard has revealed that the militant leader had tried and failed to set up a satellite TV link-up from his Afghan hideout to watch the 9/11 terror attacks as they happened.

Nasser al-Bahri said his former master had requested a satellite dish to be installed in his hideout in Kandahar.

“He asked for satellite TV to be able to follow the bombing,” The Telegraph quoted al-Bahri, as saying.

However, due to the rugged, mountainous terrain, he was not able to get a signal and so failed to view the planes striking the twin towers of the World Trade Centre in New York.

He further claims that the Al-Qaeda leader is still alive, and he might be under tribal protection in Waziristan.

“His death, even if it was not announced immediately for internal reasons, would end up being known in jihadist circles and on the Internet,” al-Bahri said.

“(The tribes’) allegiance is more religious than tribal, which is a bonus for bin Laden, who built them roads and houses twenty years ago,” he added.

On September 11, 2001, Al-Qaeda terrorists had intentionally hijacked and crashed two planes into the twin towers, killing everyone on board and many others working in the buildings.

Both buildings collapsed within two hours, destroying nearby buildings and damaging others.

The hijackers crashed a third airliner into the Pentagon, just outside Washington D.C.

A fourth plane crashed into a field near Shanksville in rural Pennsylvania after some of its passengers and flight crew attempted to retake control of the plane, which the hijackers had redirected toward Washington D.C.

There were no survivors from any of the flights, and 2,973 people died as a result of the attacks, including nationals of over 70 countries. (ANI)

Factbox: Obama’s strategy on Afghanistan

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama made an unannounced visit to Afghanistan on Sunday, his first since he took office, for talks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and to express his thanks to U.S. troops.

Barack Obama

The following are some facts about Obama’s strategy on Afghanistan.

* Obama campaigned in 2008 on a pledge to return the fight against Islamic extremism to where it began, in Afghanistan, while promising to pull U.S. forces out of Iraq. He has begun to deliver on that promise, ordering the deployment of 30,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan as part of an effort to take the battle to the Taliban while training Afghan soldiers to take over their own security.

Obama reached his new strategy after a lengthy review period last autumn. In a pledge that may be hard to meet, he said he would like to begin pulling some U.S. troops out of Afghanistan by July of 2011.

* While Obama’s healthcare overhaul is generating great skepticism among Americans, people are largely backing him on Afghanistan. A CNN/Opinion Research poll last week said 55 percent of Americans back Obama’s strategy for Afghanistan. But Americans are also weary of the war that was begun after the September 11, 2001, attacks. The poll found that in general, 49 percent oppose the war while 48 percent favor it. Afghanistan is the one issue where his Republican opponents have backed Obama, supporting his moves to increase U.S. troop strength, having believed that Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush, took his eye off Afghanistan while waging war in Iraq.

* Obama has also been pressing Karzai to make greater strides toward improving the rule of law and fighting corruption within the Afghan government. Karzai won re-election last year after a vote that observers said was marred by widespread fraud. When Karzai was declared the winner in November, Obama told him it was time to “write a new chapter based on improved governance, a much more serious effort to eradicate corruption, joint efforts to accelerate the training of Afghan security forces so that the Afghan people can provide for their own security.”

Compared to Bush, Obama has been far cooler to Karzai but his trip there on Sunday and invitation for Karzai to visit Washington on May 12 signaled the possibility of a closer relationship.

* As part of the new strategy, U.S. and NATO troops are waging their largest offensive in Afghanistan since the start of the war in 2001, aimed at driving the Taliban from Marjah, their last big stronghold in the violent southern Helmand Province, to make way for Afghan authorities to take it over. The offensive is an important piece of Obama’s plan to use his troops surge to seize insurgent-held areas and shift control to local authorities before the United States begins to bring its troops out of Afghanistan.

* The CIA has also stepped up its use of Predator drone aircraft to fire missiles at Taliban targets, particularly in the wake of the killing of eight CIA agents by a suicide bomber who infiltrated a CIA base in Khost, Afghanistan in late December. It was the deadliest attack on the CIA in 20 years.

(Editing by Patricia Wilson and Doina Chiacu)

Holder defends criminal trials for 9/11 suspects

(Reuters) – Attorney General Eric Holder on Tuesday defended plans to prosecute some terrorism suspects in traditional criminal courts, urging lawmakers to avoid politicizing the decision and inflaming public fears.

U.S. | Barack Obama

Holder has faced fierce criticism for planning to try the self-proclaimed mastermind of the September 11, 2001, attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, in a criminal court, with many calling for military trials for him and four alleged conspirators.

Faced with the prospect of Congress withholding funds for both the trials and closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the White House has intervened and is now reconsidering the trial venue. However, that decision is weeks away.

Nonetheless, Holder defended criminal trials as a successful method for prosecuting terrorism suspects, noting that security at past trials has been tight with no incidents and they make it easier to get guilty pleas from suspects.

“They are tested … they are secure, we have tried these cases in a safe manner,” Holder told a House Appropriations subcommittee. “Our allies around the world support us in bringing these cases in (criminal) courts.”

Republicans, and even some of President Barack Obama’s fellow Democrats, have demanded that the five men be prosecuted in revamped military trials, arguing that they should not receive full U.S. legal rights or be given a platform for their anti-American rhetoric.

“There is a very legitimate and robust conversation we should have about it,” Holder said. “But we cannot allow the politics of fear to drive us apart.”

Holder bristled at suggestions that the suspects would be “coddled” if afforded full U.S. legal rights, saying they would be treated “just like any other murderer.”

He also said that judges have prevented outbursts by terrorism suspects, pointing to the recent trial of a Pakistani woman in a New York court last month, during which the judge removed her repeatedly in response to her outbursts.

FULL LEGAL RIGHTS?

Still, Republicans on the subcommittee slammed the prospect of criminal court trials for terrorism suspects and clashed with Holder on whether full legal rights should be given to enemy combatants captured overseas.

“This is war and in a time of war we as a nation have never given constitutional rights to foreign nationals, enemy soldiers, certainly captured overseas,” said Representative John Culberson.

Seizing on the suggestion by Holder that al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden would be treated similarly to mass murderer Charles Manson, Culberson argued that showed a disconnect between the administration and the American public.

Holder said that the Obama administration knew the United States was engaged in a war but said that it was vastly different than past wars and that even in military trials the defendants are given access to lawyers and other legal rights.

“I understand we are at war with al Qaeda,” Holder said, adding that the United States was unlikely to face the prospect of putting bin Laden on trial because he had indicated he would rather die fighting.

“We would be reading Miranda rights to the corpse of Osama bin Laden,” Holder said, referring to a criminal suspect’s right to remain silent and have an attorney present during questioning. “He will never appear in an American courtroom. That’s a reality.”

Later in the hearing, Holder tried to clarify his remarks, saying he frequently has heard that terrorism suspects are being given the rights equal to the average American.

“They are not treated as average Americans. They are treated as murderers,” he said.

Holder said a decision about where to prosecute Mohammed and the four alleged co-conspirators was likely weeks, but not months, away.

“Facts, facts, not fear, must be the basis of all of our discussions,” he said.

(Editing by David Alexander and Eric Walsh)

US envoy calls on Manmohan Singh, Chidambaram

New Delhi, Sep.18 (ANI): U.S. Ambassador to India Timothy J. Roemer met Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh and Home Minister P. Chidambaram on Friday.

Ambassador Roemer met Prime Minister Singh at his official Race Course Road residence.

During their meeting they discussed the planned visits of the Prime Minister to the United States and a broad range of bilateral and global issues.

Ambassador Roemer conveyed President Obama’s warm greetings and anticipation at seeing the Prime Minister in Pittsburgh for the G-20 meeting and for the Prime Minister’s official state visit in November.

“The upcoming official state visit, the first by a foreign leader during the Obama Administration, is a testament to the vital importance of the U.S.-India strategic partnership in addressing our greatest global challenges,” said Ambassador Roemer.

Earlier, the Ambassador met with Home Affairs Minister P. Chidambaram to review the important next steps which India and the United States will be pursuing following the Minister’s successful working visit to the United States.

During the visit, Minister Chidambaram met with the full range of senior officials in New York and Washington to discuss America’s homeland security initiatives following the September 11, 2001, attacks as well as future initiatives for security and counterterrorism cooperation between India and the United States. (ANI)

US marks eighth anniversary of 9/11 terror strike

New York, Sep 11(ANI): The eighth anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center twin towers in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington, which killed nearly 3,000 people, was observed here on Friday.

On September 11, 2001, four hijacked planes crashed into the twin Towers, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania.

Memorial ceremonies are to be held at these sites and four moments of silence are observed, at 8:46 a.m., 9:03 a.m., 9:59 a.m. and 10:29 a.m. ET, as these were the timings when the attacks took place.

President Barack Obama attended the wreath-laying ceremony at the Pentagon, where 184 people died.

The names of more than 2,700 victims from the site were also read by family members and volunteers at the New York ceremony, which was attended by U.S. Vice-President Joe Biden.

For the first time, the anniversary was designated as a National Day of Service. On Thursday, Obama issued a proclamation honouring those who died and had urged Americans to mark the anniversary with acts of community service.

Remembering those who lost their lives on the tragic day, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, said: “It is the sacred duty of the living to carry within us the memories of those we lost. While there is pain in remembering the loss, there is sweetness in remembering their lives.” (ANI)

Pak overhauled nuke command and controls following 9/11: US report

Washington, Sep.10 (ANI): A latest US report has revealed that Islamabad, over the years, has overhauled its nuclear command and controls besides implementing new personnel security programmes.

The report also acknowledges that Pakistan has taken several steps to assure the international community regarding the safety of its nuclear facilities.

“Pakistan has in recent years taken a number of steps to increase international confidence in the security of its nuclear arsenal,” the latest US Congressional Research Service report said.

The report also said that besides ‘dramatically’ adding to its nuclear stockpile and overhauling nuclear command and control structures since September 11, 2001, Islamabad has implemented new security programmes.

“A number of important initiatives, such as strengthened export control laws, improved personnel security and international nuclear security cooperation programmes have improved Pakistan’s security situation in recent years,” The Nation quoted the report, as stating.

The report added that since Dr.A Q Khan’s proliferation network was unearthed in 2004, Islamabad has taken a number of steps to improve its nuclear security and to prevent further proliferation of nuclear technologies and materials.

Referring to Pakistan’s reply to India’s nuclear tests in May, 1998, it said that Islamabad’s ‘minimum credible deterrent’ doctrine is widely regarded as primarily a deterrent to Indian military action.

The report also mentions the concerns regarding the safety and security of the nuclear establishments especially in the context of instability in Pakistan. (ANI)

Taliban may kidnap AQ Khan for hefty ransom: Pak editorial

Islamabad, Sep.4 (ANI): An editorial has suggested that Taliban may try to kidnap the disgraced Pakistani nuclear scientist Dr.Abdul Qadeer Khan for a hefty ransom, which is supposed the prime reason behind resumption of security restrictions on him.

While many believe that it was sustained US pressure because of which the government is forced to retain the restrictions on Dr. Khan, an editorial in a leading Pakistan daily suggested that the father of country’s nuclear program is under severe threat from the Taliban.

According to The Daily Times editorial, the Taliban could abduct Dr.Khan, who is considered as one of the greatest nuclear proliferators of all time, and demand a price that it has never received in ransom.

The editorial stated that Taliban would not only demand ransom from Islamabad, but also from the United States, which has been pushing Pakistan to hand over Dr. Khan for interrogations.

“The ransom will be demanded not only from Pakistan but from the US as well! And he will go to the highest bidder. Even in normal circumstances, Dr Khan would be a very attractive victim, but given Islamabad’s security, he is under more threat than any other person living in the country,” the editorial said.

In January 2004, Khan confessed to having been involved in a clandestine international network of nuclear weapons technology proliferation from Pakistan to Libya, Iran and North Korea. On February 5, 2004, President General Pervez Musharraf, announced that he had pardoned Dr. Khan as he was a national hero.

In an August 23, 2005 interview with Kyodo News, Musharraf confirmed that Khan had supplied gas centrifuges and gas centrifuge parts to North Korea and, possibly, an amount of uranium hexafluoride gas.

Khan came under scrutiny following the September 11, 2001 attacks in the U.S. and the subsequent US invasion of Afghanistan to oust the fundamentalist Taliban regime in Afghanistan. It emerged that al-Qaeda had made repeated efforts to obtain nuclear weapons materials to build either a radiological bomb or a crude nuclear bomb. In late October 2001, the Pakistani government arrested three Pakistani nuclear scientists, all with close ties to Khan, for their suspected connections with the Taliban.

The Bush administration continued to investigate Pakistani nuclear weapons proliferation, ratcheting up the pressure on the Pakistani government in 2001 and 2002 and focusing on Khan’s personal role. He has been under house arrest since February 2004. (ANI)

Lahore High Court lifts security restrictions on A Q Khan

Lahore, Aug.28 (ANI): The Lahore High Court (LHC) has lifted security restrictions from disgraced nuclear scientist Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan.

According to The Nation, the LHC has directed the district magistrate and DIG Islamabad to end Khan’s official protocol with immediate effect.

The court has summoned both officials to appear before it on September 4 and explain the reason to keep Khan in captivity under the pretext of protocol.

On Thursday, Khan moved a petition in the Lahore Court challenging his official protocol, terming it a hindrance.

Khan’s counsel SM Zafar told the court that the Islamabad High Court had directed the the government to provide official protocol to Dr. Khan, adding that the protocol restricted his freedom of movement and he felt like a prisoner.

Khan, is widely regarded as the founder of Pakistan’s nuclear program.

In January 2004, Khan confessed to having been involved in a clandestine international network of nuclear weapons technology proliferation from Pakistan to Libya, Iran and North Korea. On February 5, 2004, President General Pervez Musharraf, announced that he had pardoned Dr. Khan as he was a national hero.

In an August 23, 2005 interview with Kyodo News, Musharraf confirmed that Khan had supplied gas centrifuges and gas centrifuge parts to North Korea and, possibly, an amount of uranium hexafluoride gas.

Khan came under scrutiny following the September 11, 2001 attacks in the U.S. and the subsequent US invasion of Afghanistan to oust the fundamentalist Taliban regime in Afghanistan. It emerged that al-Qaeda had made repeated efforts to obtain nuclear weapons materials to build either a radiological bomb or a crude nuclear bomb. In late October 2001, the Pakistani government arrested three Pakistani nuclear scientists, all with close ties to Khan, for their suspected connections with the Taliban.

The Bush administration continued to investigate Pakistani nuclear weapons proliferation, ratcheting up the pressure on the Pakistani government in 2001 and 2002 and focusing on Khan’s personal role. He has been under house arrest since February 2004. (ANI)