Just like humans, apes suffer from self-doubt too

London, April 19 (ANI): Just like humans, apes are sufficiently self-aware to doubt their own knowledge, says a new study.

As part of the research, Josep Call of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, put food in one of two opaque plastic pipes and had watching bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans pick the one with the food.

Call found that if they were made to wait, the apes sometimes forgot where the food was, but by and large they did well on the task, reports New Scientist.

To find out if the apes doubted their own decisions, Call gave them the option to peek into the end of the pipes before they chose one.

He found that the apes were more likely to check the pipes if they had to wait before picking one.

Call says this suggests that the apes had begun to doubt their memory.

The study has been published in the journal Animal Cognition. (ANI)

Just like humans, apes suffer from self-doubt too

London, April 19 (ANI): Just like humans, apes are sufficiently self-aware to doubt their own knowledge, says a new study.

As part of the research, Josep Call of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, put food in one of two opaque plastic pipes and had watching bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans pick the one with the food.

Call found that if they were made to wait, the apes sometimes forgot where the food was, but by and large they did well on the task, reports New Scientist.

To find out if the apes doubted their own decisions, Call gave them the option to peek into the end of the pipes before they chose one.

He found that the apes were more likely to check the pipes if they had to wait before picking one.

Call says this suggests that the apes had begun to doubt their memory.

The study has been published in the journal Animal Cognition. (ANI)

Women lawmakers outperform male counterparts, says study

Washington, Sep.16 (ANI): A study conducted by Stanford University and the University of Chicago reaerchers has concluded that women lawmakers in Congress introduce more bills, attract more co-sponsors and bring home more money for their districts than their male counterparts do.

The study, accessed by Politico, examined the performance of House members between 1984 and 2004, and found that women delivered roughly nine percent more discretionary spending for their districts than men.

While there are obviously variables beyond gender – seniority, party affiliation, majority/minority status and the differing priorities of a freshman and a veteran lawmaker – the researchers say they’ve accounted for those in making their male-to-female comparisons.

The researchers also found that women introduced more legislation than men who served in their same districts, often hitting the ground running in their first terms.

“We find that, on average, women sponsor about three bills more per Congress per term than their male counterparts. They co-sponsor more bills than other members, and they also obtain more co-sponsors for their own bills,” said one of the researchers.

Since 1789, women have constituted just two percent of the total congressional population. The ratio of female to male representatives has increased in recent years, but the pace is still fairly glacial: Nearly 17 percent of House members are women today, compared with about 3 percent in 1979.

Researchers say the small number of female members may have something to do with their effectiveness. Women who run and win are likely the most politically ambitious and talented of their pool, having potentially overcome hurdles including voter bias and self-doubt about their ability to win.

Female candidates also tend to attract more challengers. Politically eligible women tend to doubt their ability to get elected and raise money more than men do, multiple studies have indicated.

Once women get to Capitol Hill, those hurdles may drive them to perform better, on average, than male counterparts who have faced a less contentious road. (ANI)

Kate Winslet to sue UK tabloid over ‘nasty’ fitness regime article

London, May 9 (ANI): Kate Winslet is to sue a leading UK tabloid newspaper over an article claiming that she had lied about her diet.

The 33-year-old actress has filed papers at London’s High Court and is suing the Daily Mail newspaper for 150,000 pounds.

Talking about the write-up, Winslet said that she was “distressed and embarrassed” about the feature, headlined “Should Kate Winslet win an Oscar for the world’s most irritating actress?”.

The article by Liz Jones, a columnist, was published on 30 January this year, reports The Independent.

Winslet, who believes the article was written in an “unpleasant and nasty way”, is taking Associated Newspapers, the Daily Mail’s owner, to court for 150,000 pounds in libel damages and claims that the article “injured her personal and professional reputation”.

The Mail article, which has since been removed from the newspaper’s website, accused the star of being less than honest about her fitness regime.

Comparing her to other Hollywood actresses, Jones questioned whether Winslet was becoming “as drippy and as impossibly vain as the rest of them”.

In particular, the tabloid questioned a quote Winslet had given to Elle.

“I don’t go to the gym because I don’t have time, but I do Pilates workout DVDs for 20 minutes or more every day at home,” Winslet told the magazine.

Jones continued: “Spend enough time … standing next to women with the physique of broken umbrellas with inflated bits stuck on, and the seeds of self-doubt will sprout, grow and choke you … It is the duplicitousness that enrages me and most other women I have spoken to. Come on, Kate, just be honest about how hard it is to be that size, don’t pretend you are still normal.” (ANI)

Pietersen says only England can dig itself out of its present mess

London, Mar.29 (ANI): England batsman Kevin Pietersen has said that while he accepts that there has been a fall in standards, the dreadful run of results associated with the team during the tour of the Caribbean, can only be blamed on England and no one else.

In an article for the News of The World, Pietersen said: “At the moment, being part of the England squad is a pretty damn lonely place to be. We don’t need anybody to tell us how dreadful we were on Friday or how it’s vital we salvage something from these last two games. We realise that every time we get together as a group. It’s our responsibility to put it right, nobody else’s. There’s nobody who can dig England out of this hole except ourselves.”
“Now, though, it might be that I have to change my approach a little. Everything that has gone on this winter has just intensified the pressure and the expectation and it’s become mentally gruelling and tough to keep doing the same things,” he adds.

“Look at Australia. They went through a huge period of self-doubt when all the legends and great players left the side and suddenly they didn’t seem so invincible. They lost a home Test series for the first time in years and were criticised heavily. But they regrouped, they dug deep and bounced back. That’s exactly what we have to do, starting today,” he concludes. (ANI)