Iran will react if ships inspected: Ahmadinejad

(Reuters) – Iran will react swiftly if its commercial shipping or aviation are subjected to inspection, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Sunday.

A U.N. Security Council resolution on June 9 imposed restrictions on Iranian shipping and other sectors to try to persuade Tehran to curb its nuclear enrichment activities.

Under the latest sanctions, countries would have the authority to inspect cargo ships heading to or from Iran.

“You should know whoever takes a decision against the Iranian nation, such as the so-called inspection of the Iranian ships or so-and-so toward its aircraft, will immediately receive Iran’s reaction,” told a conference in a speech broadcast live on radio.

Earlier this month, the European Union banned more planes operated by Iran Air from flying into the airspace of the 27-country bloc on safety grounds.

It denied reports there was a ban on Iranian commercial airliners refueling in Germany and Britain as a result of U.S. sanctions. However, some oil companies have stopped jet fuel supplies to Iranian aircraft outside Iran.

Restating that the Islamic state did not seek hostility with any country, Ahmadinejad said: “We are in favor of friendship and logic.”

Iran, the world’s fifth largest oil producer, has been the subject of four rounds of U.N. sanctions over its defiance to suspend its uranium enrichment activities.

Iran says its nuclear program is designed to produce electricity and sanctions will not bring about any change.

(Writing by Hashem Kalantari, Editing by Andrew Dobbie)

Karzai to ask UN to trim Taliban blacklist -report

July 12 (Reuters) – Afghan President Hamid Karzai plans to ask the United Nations to remove as many as 50 former Taliban members from a U.N. blacklist, The Washington Post reported on Monday.

The request to remove about a quarter of the 137 names on the list is aimed at advancing reconciliation talks with insurgents, the report said, citing a senior Afghan official.

At least five of those named on the sanction list are former Taliban officials who now serve in parliament or privately mediate between the Afghan government and the insurgents battling NATO-led forces and their Afghan partners.

The senior Afghan official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said Karzai would request that 30 to 50 names be delisted to “remove all those Taliban who are not part of al-Qaeda and are not terrorists,” the Post reported.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, met with U.N. officials on Tuesday to press them to move forward on the delisting process, the Post reported, citing sources familiar with the talks in New York.

Holbrooke hopes to reach agreement on delisting some of the purportedly reformed Taliban members before an international conference this month in Kabul that is aimed at bolstering stability in Afghanistan, the article said.

U.N. Security Council Resolution 1267 freezes assets and limits travel of senior figures linked to the Taliban, as well as al Qaeda, but recent Afghan efforts to engage some insurgents in diplomacy have raised doubts about who should be on the list.

The United States opposes the delisting of some of the most violent Taliban fighters, including leader Mohammad Omar, the Post said.

Karzai’s office said last month that the United Nations had agreed to gradually delist Taliban figures provided they had “no links to al Qaeda or other terrorist groups.”

U.N. officials were demanding more evidence that they have renounced violence, embraced the new Afghan constitution and severed any links with the Taliban and al-Qaeda, The Washington Post said. (Reporting by JoAnne Allen; editing by Eric Beech)

Gates disappointed by Turkey vote on Iran sanctions

June 11 (Reuters) – U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Friday he was disappointed by Turkey’s decision to vote against a U.N. Security Council resolution on sanctions against Iran but said it would not affect U.S.-Turkish military cooperation.

“I was disappointed by the Turkey vote in the Iranian sanctions. That said, Turkey is a decades-long ally of the United States and other members of NATO,” Gates said after a meeting of NATO defence ministers in Brussels.

“Turkey continues to play a critical part in the alliance,” he said.

Turkey, a key NATO member, joined Brazil in voting against the U.N. resolution on Wednesday, but the resolution still passed and the world powers are moving ahead with tighter sanctions on Tehran.

Nations may block oil, gas investment in Iran-Gates

June 9 (Reuters) – A U.N. Security Council resolution against Iran could clear the way for individual states and the EU to take further steps, including blocking foreign companies from expanding Tehran’s oil and gas exports, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Wednesday.

Gates, in an interview taped before the Security Council voted to impose new sanctions on Iran, said the U.N. resolution, provided a legal platform for individual countries to take “more far-reaching steps individually.”

In an interview with al Jazeera’s “Frost Over the World” programme, Gates said those tougher measures could target front companies for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards including shipping lines and imports. “There are a variety of areas that can be targeted preventing foreign companies from going in to help them maintain or grow their oil or gas export capability or any other business enterprises,” Gates added, according to a transcript of the interview, which was taped on Wednesday in London hours before the U.N. vote. (Reporting by Adam Entous; editing by Tim Pearce)

Russia warns U.S. against unilateral Iran sanctions

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned the United States and other Western nations on Thursday against imposing unilateral sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme, Interfax news agency reported.

The European Union has said it may impose unilateral sanctions if a U.N. Security Council resolution fails.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration has been lobbying Western companies not to do business with Iran, but has not imposed sanctions against them.

Countries facing Security Council sanctions “cannot under any circumstances be the subject of one-sided sanctions imposed by one or other government bypassing the Security Council”, Lavrov was quoted as saying by Interfax.

“The position of the United States today does not display understanding of this absolutely clear truth.”

Russia is in talks with the United States and other U.N. Security Council members on a fourth round of sanctions. Moscow has indicated it could support broader sanctions but has stressed they must not harm the Iranian people.

Washington has not publicly warned of unilateral sanctions but has made clear it wants tougher measures than veto-wielding Security Council member Russia is likely to accept.

Permanent Security Council member China has joined Russia in opposing Washington’s plans to impose tough, wide-ranging sanctions on the Islamic Republic over its refusal to suspend sensitive uranium enrichment activity and open up fully to U.N. nuclear inspections.

Lavrov’s warning came just before the arrival in Russia on Thursday of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil, a non-permament member of the Security Council that is also opposed to further sanctions against Iran.

Lula was expected to meet senior Russian officials on Friday to discuss how to revive a stalled nuclear fuel swap deal meant to minimise the risk of Tehran using enrichment for military purposes. Lula will travel on to Iran on Sunday.

Lavrov, speaking to deputies from Russia’s upper house of parliament, said the United States tended not to see international law as having pre-eminence over national laws.

“We are now confronted with this problem during discussion of a new U.N. Security Council resolution on Iran.”

Despite his criticism, Lavrov said that relations with the United States had shown clear signs of improvement, specifically with the signing of a nuclear-disarmament treaty that would reduce their deployed nuclear warheads by about 30 percent.

He said the document would soon be submitted to Russia’s parliament for ratification.

South Korea calls North Korea’s ‘nuclear fusion’ claim bluff

New Delhi, May 12 (ANI): South Korea has dismissed North Korea’s claims of successfully producing a nuclear fusion reaction as untrue. They cite lack of adequate funds and facilities that are necessary for carrying out costly experiments and its lack of nuclear research as the reason for ruling out such claims.

Nuclear experts too have discounted their tall claims saying that North Korean scientists had been trying to achieve a fusion reaction for five years without success, and felt that even if the North Koreans had managed to produce the reaction, it would be rudimentary in nature.

Local media in Seoul cited unidentified South Korean officials as dismissing Pyongyang”s claim, with many nuclear experts in Seoul also laughing it away, Xinhua reports.

Seoul”s Yonhap News Agency quoted a South Korean foreign ministry official as calling Pyongyang”s claim “absurd,” citing a lack of intelligence indicating the country has costly facilities needed for such experiments.

Moreover, even if their claims were true, South Korean officials feel these experiments could in a broad sense be tantamount to a violation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1874, which demands the country halt its nuclear weapons programs and conduct no further nuclear or missile tests, the agency said in its report.

Some South Korean experts feel that these claims are a strategic move by North Korea to up its ante before returning to the suspended Six-Party talks, while others pointed out that Pyongyang wants to retain its image as a nuclear state by making the claim, the agency said. (ANI)

Not inevitable Iran gets bomb: Gates

(Reuters) – Iran is not yet “nuclear capable” and the U.S. government has not concluded that it is inevitable that Tehran will get the bomb, Pentagon chief Robert Gates said in remarks aired on Sunday.

Barack Obama

“It is our judgment … they are not nuclear capable, not yet,” Gates, the U.S. defense secretary, said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Asked if the U.S. government had concluded this was inevitable, Gates said, “No. We have not … drawn that conclusion at all, and in fact we are doing everything we can to try and keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons.”

However, he added that “they (the Iranians) are continuing to make progress on these (nuclear) programs. It is going slower than they anticipated but they are moving in that direction.”

U.S. President Barack Obama is pressing other global powers to agree to a fourth round of U.N. sanctions against Iran over its refusal to halt nuclear work that the West suspects is aimed at making bombs, a charge Iran denies.

But some critics of Obama’s attempts to engage Iran have said they fear his administration may be preparing to shift from a strategy of keeping Iran from getting the bomb to a strategy of containing a nuclear-armed Iran.

“We are probably going to get another U.N. Security Council resolution” of sanctions on Iran, Gates told NBC.

Gates added that the United States and other countries will continue trying to convince the Iranians that they are “headed down the wrong path” by pressuring Iran with sanctions as well as more missile defense and other military cooperation in the Gulf region.

“At the end of the day what has to happen is that the Iranian government has to decide that its own security is better served by not having nuclear weapons than by having them,” Gates said.

(Reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by Will Dunham)

China to discuss Iran sanctions; Hu to visit U.S.

China has agreed to serious negotiations with Western powers about imposing new sanctions on Iran and President Hu Jintao will attend a multi-nation summit on nuclear security in Washington this month, officials said.

The two moves should dilute tensions between Beijing and Washington after months of quarrels over the yuan currency, Internet censorship, Tibet and U.S. weapons sales to Taiwan.

The agreement to discuss sanctions marked a significant shift by China after months of fending off Western nations’ demands for concerted pressure on Tehran, which they accuse of seeking the means to assemble nuclear weapons.

Beijing has also been coy up to now about whether Hu will attend the April 12-13 nuclear summit in Washington, which would come days before the U.S. Treasury is set to release a report that could accuse China of manipulating its currency to give its exporters a competitive advantage.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said on Thursday that Hu would attend the Washington meeting.

The United States’ ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, said on Wednesday her government, Britain, France, Russia and Germany had agreed with China to begin discussing a proposed U.N. Security Council resolution with new sanctions on Iran.

“This is progress, but the negotiations have yet to begin in earnest,” Rice said in an interview on CNN.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin would not discuss specifics and stressed China’s continued hopes for diplomatic compromise. “China is highly concerned about the current situation and will strengthen cooperation with all parties,” he said.

RELUCTANT

China has long been reluctant to back new sanctions on Iran, a big supplier of oil for the growing Asian power.

A diplomat with knowledge of the talks said on Thursday China would probably support U.S. proposals to blacklist banks, impose travel bans and freeze assets, but would not be happy to blacklist Iranian shipping companies, ban arms imports, or target oil and gas industries as proposed by France.

“We are really at the start of the process,” the diplomat said. “The bottom line was to get China at the table, but where we end up is anyone’s guess. The paper on the table is the U.S. one, but it’s quite far out and there’s no way any resolution will end up looking like that. it’s a starting point.”

Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili arrived in Beijing on Thursday where he will meet Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi and Dai Bingguo, a senior Chinese diplomat who serves as a State Councillor advising leaders on foreign policy.

“Sanctions now appear to be a foregone conclusion. The likelihood of the resolution passing in the Security Council is high,” said Jin Liangxiang, a Middle East specialist at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies.

As one of the five permanent members of the Security Council, China has the power to veto any resolution. But Beijing appears to be losing some patience with Iran.

Jin said the sanctions were likely to “hit decision-makers and interests in Iran”, but not seriously affect China’s economies and energy ties.

In Moscow, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko said any measures “should be focused, pinpointed and have the aim of strengthening the non-proliferation regime”.

“We are still convinced that an approach toward using sanctions needs to be balanced and proportional, depending on the degree of cooperation on the part of Iran, and should not shut the door to further dialogue,” he said.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said in Tehran on Thursday past sanctions against Iran have not worked, the IRNA news agency reported. He said other nations should not use “incorrect methods like pressuring and sanctioning.”

Guo Xiangang, a former Chinese diplomat to Tehran, said Beijing was likely to bow only so far to the Western demands for tough sanctions.

“I’d guess that China can accept something a bit harsher (than past sanctions on Iran), but not too harsh. It will remain principally a symbolic warning to Iran,” said Guo, who is now a vice president of the China Institute of International Studies, a government thinktank in Beijing.

He said Beijing would seek to ensure that any financial sanctions did not threaten to entangle its energy and investment deals with Iran.

(Additional reporting by Louis Charbonneau and Michelle Nichols at the United Nations; Parisa Hafezi in Tehran; David Brunnstrom in Brussels and Conor Sweeney in Moscow, editing by Diana Abdallah)
Chris Buckley and Emma Graham-Harrison

China says wants peaceful solution to Iran nuclear dispute

Thu, Apr 1 12:47 PM

China will continue to seek peaceful solution to the Iran nuclear issue, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said on Thursday, after Beijing agreed to discussions on new sanctions on Tehran.

The United States and other Western powers have said China has agreed to serious negotiations about a proposed new U.N. Security Council resolution on Iran, which they say wants the means to make nuclear weapons.

China has been reluctant to back such sanctions and has repeatedly called for more diplomatic efforts to seek a solution. As a permanent member of the Security Council, Beijing has the power to veto any resolution.

(Reporting by Emma Graham-Harrison; editing by Ken Wills)

China to discuss Iran sanctions; Hu to visit U.S.

(Reuters) – China has agreed to serious negotiations with Western powers about imposing new sanctions on Iran and President Hu Jintao will attend a multi-nation summit on nuclear security in Washington this month, officials said.

World | China

The two moves should dilute tensions between Beijing and Washington after months of quarrels over the yuan currency, Internet censorship, Tibet and U.S. weapons sales to Taiwan.

The agreement to discuss sanctions marked a significant shift by China after months of fending off Western nations’ demands for concerted pressure on Tehran, which they accuse of seeking the means to assemble nuclear weapons.

Beijing has also been coy up to now about whether Hu will attend the April 12-13 nuclear summit in Washington, which would come days before the U.S. Treasury is slated to release a report that could accuse China of manipulating its currency to give its exporters a competitive advantage.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang told a news conference on Thursday that Hu would attend the Washington meeting.

The United States’ ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, said on Wednesday in New York that her government, Britain, France, Russia and Germany had agreed with China to begin discussing a proposed U.N. Security Council resolution with new sanctions on Iran.

“This is progress, but the negotiations have yet to begin in earnest,” Rice said in an interview on CNN.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin would not discuss specifics of a resolution and stressed China’s continued hopes for diplomatic compromise over Iran.

“China is highly concerned about the current situation and will strengthen cooperation with all parties,” he said.

RELUCTANT

China has long been reluctant to back new sanctions on Iran, a big supplier of oil for the growing Asian power.

Underscoring Beijing’s centrality in the accelerating negotiations, Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili arrived there on Thursday.

Jalili would meet Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi and Dai Bingguo, a senior Chinese diplomat who serves as a State Councillor advising leaders on foreign policy, said Qin.

“Sanctions now appear to be a foregone conclusion. The likelihood of the resolution passing in the Security Council is high,” said Jin Liangxiang, a Middle East specialist at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies.

As one of the five permanent members of the Security Council, China has the power to veto any resolution. But Beijing appears to be losing some patience with Iran.

Jin said the sanctions were likely to “hit decision-makers and interests in Iran,” but not seriously affect China’s economies and energy ties.

President Barack Obama said on Tuesday that he wants a new Iran sanctions resolution adopted within weeks.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said in Tehran on Thursday that past sanctions against his country have not worked, the official IRNA news agency reported.

He said other nations should not use “incorrect methods like pressuring and sanctioning.”

Guo Xiangang, a former Chinese diplomat to Tehran, said Beijing was likely to bow only so far to the Western demands for tough sanctions.

“I’d guess that China can accept something a bit harsher (than past sanctions on Iran), but not too harsh. It will remain principally a symbolic warning to Iran,” said Guo, who is now a vice president of the China Institute of International Studies, a government thinktank in Beijing.

He said Beijing would seek to ensure that any financial sanctions did not threaten to entangle its energy and investment deals with Iran.

(Additional reporting by Louis Charbonneau and Michelle Nichols at the United Nations; Parisa Hafezi in Tehran; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)

Clinton says China playing role in Iran debate

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, launching a G8 foreign ministers summit on Monday, said the world could not accept a nuclear-armed Iran and that China would be involved in considering new sanctions proposals.

Speaking at a meeting expected to focus on Iran, Clinton played down fears that China was out of step with the other permanent members of the U.N. Security Council on the question of imposing a fourth round of sanctions against Tehran.

“In fact, China is part of the consultative group that has been unified all along the way, which has made it very clear that a nuclear-armed Iran is not acceptable to the international community,” Clinton told CTV in an interview.

“I think, as the weeks go forward and we begin the hard work of trying to come up with a Security Council resolution, China will be involved. They will be making their suggestions,” she said.

“As in any effort, we’re going to have to try to come to some consensus and we’re in the middle of that process.”

Clinton’s comments, at the start of a meeting of the foreign ministers of the the Group of Eight industrialized countries — United States, Canada, Britain, France, Japan, Germany, Italy and Russia — were the latest optimistic note from Washington that it was winning China over to the idea of new sanctions on Iran.

The White House issued a brief statement late on Mondaysaying President Barack Obama had met with the new Chinese envoy to Washington and told him the United States wanted to develop a positive relationship with Beijing.

“The president also stressed the need for the United States and China to work together and with the international community on critical global issues including nonproliferation and pursuing sustained and balanced global growth,” the statement said.

The three Western members of the Security Council — the United States, France and Britain — along with Germany have been pushing hard for a new round of sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program, which they fear is a cover for producing atomic weapons.

Russia has been less enthusiastic but has recently signaled it may come on board with the plan.

But China, which has close economic links to Iran, has repeatedly said that the world needs more time to find a diplomatic solution to the standoff over the Iranian nuclear program, which Tehran insists is purely for peaceful purposes.

Despite this, a Chinese official last week took part in a conference call with other powers to discuss a U.S. proposal on sanctions, Beijing’s first step in months to engage in serious discussions on the issue.

While the group did not agree on a specific proposal, another conference call is expected in the coming days as diplomats try to close the gaps and agree on a sanctions plan acceptable to the Chinese, U.S. officials said.

“They have said now that they will engage on the elements of a resolution,” one senior U.S. official said.

Momentum for new sanctions has gathered steam since Tehran rejected an offer of a nuclear fuel swap deal that would have been brokered by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg, speaking to reporters in Washington, said the United States was increasingly encouraged by the signs coming from Beijing.

“On issues of concern to us, we have seen some progress,” Steinberg said.

“We’ve had a recognition by our Chinese counterparts of the danger of the Iranian nuclear program and the fact that there does not seem to be a willingness (by) the Iranians to take the very generous offer.”

MOSCOW ATTACKS CAST SHADOW

The G8 meeting was also expected to take up other issues including the impasse over North Korea’s nuclear program, nuclear non-proliferation, and the threat posed by extremist groups — underscored by Monday’s suicide suicide bomb attacks that killed 38 in Moscow metro stations.

The G8 ministers released a statement strongly condemning the “cowardly terrorist attacks on Moscow” and calling for those responsible to be brought to justice.

“They vowed that they would continue to thwart and constrain terrorists and to work for a world that is safe for all, based on the principles of democracy, and respect for the rule of law and for human rights,” the statement said.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told the Interfax news agency that militants operating on the Afghan-Pakistan border may have helped organize the Moscow attacks, which saw two female bombers target metro stations during the morning rush hour.

Clinton, who earlier issued her own condemnation of the Moscow attack, told CTV that overall there was a connection between most of the terror attacks around the world.

“They get encouragement from each other, they exchange training, explosives, information,” Clinton said, while saying she did not know the details of the Moscow incident.

“I don’t think we want to go so far as to say they are all part of the same operation, but certainly there is a common theme to many of them,” she said.

(Additional reporting by David Ljunggren in Ottawa, Paul Eckert and Deborah Charles in Washington and Conor Humphries in Moscow)

Govt. wants Pakistan to dismantle terror outfits from its soil

New Delhi, Aug 24(ANI): Union External Affairs Minister S M Krishna on Monday expressed India’s concern over terrorism and said that it was high time Pakistan dismantled terror from its soil.

“India is willing to cooperate with Pakistan, including addressing each other’s security concerns. But, the biggest impediment is and continues to be that Pakistan side is being used by terrorists who have attacked India repeatedly and those terrorist infrastructure are not being dismantled,” Krishna said while speaking to media persons in the national capital.

“I think that is the cause of concern for us and we are still hoping that Pakistan would realise that is about time they should react favourably to India,” he added.

Earlier on Friday, Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao had given the sixth dossier to Pakistan’s High Commissioner Shahid Malik regarding last year’s Mumbai terror attack, which claimed at least 166 lives.

India has insisted that Pakistan has enough evidence to successfully prosecute leaders of the Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group, including Hafiz Saeed, who was detained in the wake of the Mumbai attacks after a UN Security Council resolution put him on a list of people and organisations supporting Al-Qaeda.

Saeed was later released by the Lahore High Court on grounds of insufficient evidence. (ANI)

France wants to expand G8 group

L’Aquila (Italy), July 10 (DPA) French President Nicolas Sarkozy is pushing for an expansion of the Group of Eight (G8).
“The G8 are no longer representative enough to manage the economic crisis,” Sarkozy said Thursday in L’Aquila, Italy, after the close of the second day of the summit of the world’s seven leading industrialised democracies plus Russia.

Major emerging economies including China and India must be brought in for permanent membership, Sarkozy said. France, which takes over the rotating G8 leadership in 2011, intends to create a G14 group, he said.

“It’s unavoidable,” he said. “We must include these countries in discussions from the very beginning. There’s no way around it.”

Sarkozy expressed support for similar efforts to expand the UN’ most important decision-making body, the Security Council. He wants the permanent members to include Germany, Japan and India.

The suggestions are not new. The current permanent members, who have the power of veto over any Security Council resolution, are the World War II victors: China, Russia, the US, France and Britain. Other large contributors to the UN including Japan and European countries are pushing for equal clout.

Sarkozy questioned the continuing dominant role of the US dollar as the global currency.

“The world cannot continue to use just one currency” as its common denominator, he said.

Most of international commerce is calculated in US dollars, and the dollar dominates international financial markets.

South Korea claims North has test-fired three more missiles

Seoul (South Korea), July 4 (ANI): South Korea’s Defence Ministry said on Saturday that North Korea had test-fired three missiles, further stoking tensions in the international community, which continues to berate Pyongyang for its nuclear ambitions.

The firing of the missiles, reported to have a range of up to 500 kilometres (312 miles), follow a series of missile launches earlier this week by North Korea.

A spokesperson of the South Korean Defence Ministry claimed that the first two of the three missiles were launched between 8 and 8.30 a.m., while the third one was fired at 10:45 a.m. local time.

She said all three missiles were launched from the Kitdaeryong Base, near the eastern port of Wonsan, into the East Sea (Sea of Japan).

South Korea’s Yonhap news agency said the first two missiles were Scuds.

North Korea fired four short-range missiles on Thursday into the Sea of Japan but the range of those missiles was estimated to be only around 120 km.

Japan condemned the latest missile launches as a “serious act of provocation.”

“It is a serious act of provocation against the security of neighbouring countries, including our country,” Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura was quoted by Jiji Press as saying.

The Japanese government’s top spokesman said the act was also against a UN Security Council resolution, according to Jiji.

North Korea has made a series of bellicose moves this year. It launched a long-range rocket on April 5 and followed it up with a nuclear test on May 25.

Thereafter, the country has fired a total of six short-range missiles, renounced the truce on the Korean peninsula that has been in place for for half a century and threatened to attack South Korea. (ANI)

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates Announced U.S. Fortifies Hawaii’s Defenses Against North Korean Arms

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates announced Thursday that he had ordered the military to deploy missile interceptors and radar to protect Hawaii from a North Korean long-range rocket.

The defense secretary’s disclosure came as Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, described the military’s commitment to “vigorously enforce” the latest United Nations Security Council resolution on North Korea’s nuclear program. But he declined to confirm reports provided by other Pentagon officials that the military was tracking a North Korean freighter suspected of carrying banned materials.

Speaking at a Pentagon news conference, Mr. Gates said he had directed the military to deploy mobile, ground-based interceptors to Hawaii. Mr. Gates also ordered seaborne radar into the waters off Hawaii to provide detailed information to track and attack any North Korean missile.

“We’re obviously watching the situation in the North with respect to missile launches very closely,” Mr. Gates said, adding that the military had some concerns about North Korea’s ability to launch a missile “in the direction of Hawaii.”

Admiral Mullen declined at the news conference to confirm reports that the military was tracking a North Korean flagged cargo ship that might be hauling weapons, missile parts or even fissile material prohibited under international law.

But he did say that the military intended to fully enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 1874, passed last week after North Korea’s recent nuclear test and missile launchings. North Korea answered the United Nations action with threats to launch more missiles and to continue with its nuclear program.

The resolution calls on international navies to request inspection of suspect cargo vessels, but not to board them by force on the high seas. However, if the ship enters a foreign port, the local authorities have greater rights of inspection.

“The country of that port is required to inspect the vessel and to also keep the United Nations informed, obviously, if a vessel like this would refuse to comply,” he said.

-The New York Times.

US tracking North Korean ship suspected of carrying nukes, missiles

Washington, June 19 : The US military is tracking a flagged North Korean ship suspected of proliferating weapons material, in violation of a UN Security Council resolution passed last Friday.

A ship named Kang Nam left a port in North Korea on Wednesday, and could be carrying missile parts or nuclear materials.

The ship appears to be heading toward Singapore, according to a senior US military source. The vessel, which the military has been tracking since its departure, could be carrying weaponry, missile parts or nuclear materials.

“It is believed to be of interest,” FOX News quoted a senior US official, as saying.

This is the first suspected “proliferator” that the US and its allies have tracked from North Korea since the United Nations authorized the world’s navies to enforce compliance with a variety of UN sanctions aimed at punishing North Korea for its recent nuclear test.

The ship is currently along the coast of China, and being monitored round-the-clock by air.

The apparent violation raises the question of how the United States and its allies will respond, particularly since the UN resolution does not have a lot of teeth to it.

The resolution would not allow the United States to board the ship forcibly. Rather, US military would have to request permission to board, a request North Korea is unlikely to grant, FOX News reports.

North Korea has said that any attempt to board its ships would be viewed as an act of war and promised “100 or 1,000-fold” retaliation if provoked.

One US official said that the military could be waiting for the ship to distance itself from China before confronting it, to avoid agitating the Chinese.

The Kang Nam is known to be a ship that has been involved in proliferation activities in the past — it is “a repeat offender,” according to one military source.

The ship was detained in October 2006 by authorities in Hong Kong after the North Koreans tested their first nuclear device and the UN imposed a subsequent round of sanctions.

UN’s Ban urges North Korea to resume talks

Helsinki – UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on Tuesday urged North Korea to return to six-party talks with South Korea, China, Russia, the United States and Japan and repeated his criticism of a nuclear test by Pyongyang the day before.

Ban said he “deplored” the “flagrant violation” by North Korea of a United Nations Security Council resolution from 2006 that the country should not conduct nuclear tests.

He said he supported a UN Security Council statement issued after an emergency session Monday and other condemnations by other world leaders that criticized the test, saying the UN security council “took a very decisive measure.”

On possible sanctions or other measures, he said “this is what the security council will decide” after North Korea on Monday conducted a second nuclear test.

Ban urged Pyongyang to “refrain from taking any further measures which will deteriorate the situation, which will create tensions in the region.”

He said: “The only viable option at this time for North Korea to remain as a responsible member of the international community is to return to dialogue table,” both with its neighbour South Korea and within the framework of the six-party talks aimed at getting North Korea to scrap its nuclear programme.

Ban’s remarks were made at a joint news conference with Finnish President Tarja Halonen during a visit to Finland.

The two leaders also discussed the United Nations’ key climate talks in Copenhagen in December where countries are to seek to make proposals on the reduction of CO2 emissions and touched on other conflicts including Sri Lanka, Sudan and Somalia.(dpa)

International community strongly condemns N. Korea’s second nuke test(Lead:N.Korea)

Washington/London, May 25 (ANI): US President Barack Obama on Monday led the world community in condemning North Korea’s second nuclear test in less than three years.

In a strong reaction to the conduct of the test, Obama described the North Korean action as a “threat to international peace” and said international action was called for.

“The danger posed by North Korea’s threatening activities warrants action by the international community. We have been and will continue working with our allies and partners in the six-party talks as well as other members of the UN Security Council in the days ahead,” Obama said in his statement.

China and Russia also condemned the test, but called for a return to talks.

China said it was “resolutely opposed” to the test, while Russia called it “a blow to non-proliferation efforts”.

But both urged North Korea back to the negotiating table – with Russia saying six-party talks were the “only solution”.

Both countries are fearful of a destabilizing effect that military action or cutting off trade ties could have on their impoverished former protigie.

The UN Security Council said that it would issue a strong statement of condemnation on Monday.

The UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said he was “deeply disturbed” by reports of the test – which, if confirmed, he said would violate UN Security Council resolution 1718, which demands that North Korea refrain from nuclear testing.

A spokesman for South Korean President Lee Myung-bak said the test was “a provocation that can never be tolerated”.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura said any nuclear test by the North would be “unacceptable”.

Both said they would ask for action from the UN Security Council.

UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown condemned the test “in the strongest terms” and said it would “undermine prospects for peace on the Korean peninsula”.

A number of external agencies confirmed an explosion, probably associated with a nuclear test, had taken place. It appeared to be a much more powerful blast than North Korea’s first nuclear test, in October 2006.

An official communiqui read out on North Korean state radio said another round of underground nuclear testing had been “successfully conducted… as part of measures to enhance the Republic’s self-defensive nuclear deterrent in all directions”.

An emergency session of the UN Security Council is being convened by Russia, which currently occupies the council’s rotating presidency.

Six-party disarmament talks involving the US, China, Japan, Russia and the two Koreas have stalled over Pyongyang’s failure to agree how information it has handed over on its nuclear activities and facilities should be verified.

Pyongyang pulled out of the talks last month, in protest against international condemnation of its rocket launch.

North Korea had previously agreed to dismantle its Yongbyon nuclear facility as part of an aid-for-disarmament deal and, in response, the US removed North Korea from its terrorism blacklist.

The North now believes it is no longer bound by its previous bilateral agreements with the US and agreements under the six-party talks. (ANI)

UN’s Ban: “Deeply concerned” over North Korea nuclear test report

Copenhagen – UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said Monday he was “deeply disturbed” over reports that North Korea had conducted a nuclear test.

Ban, visiting Copenhagen to attend a meeting on climate change, told Danish broadcaster TV2 he was “closely following” developments in the region and was in contact with the UN Security Council – which is to hold an emergency session later Monday in New York.

“If confirmed this constitutes a clear violation of a security council resolution 1718 of 2006 which demanded that North Korea does not conduct a nuclear test,” Ban said, adding it “poses serious implications to peace and stability in the region.”

Danish Foreign Minister Per Stig Moller said in a statement that “North Korea again challenges the international community. And that should have consequences.”

Moller said the UN Security Council should act jointly, just as it did in 2006 when North Korea conducted its first nuclear test.

North Korea earlier Monday said it had conducted a nuclear test. (dpa)

UN council demands enforcement of North Korea sanctions

UNITED NATIONS
: The UN Security Council on Monday unanimously condemned North Korea’s long-range rocket launch, saying it contravened a UN ban,
and demanded enforcement of existing sanctions against Pyongyang.

The statement, written by Washington and agreed in a meeting on Saturday of the five permanent council members and Japan, also ordered the UN sanctions committee to begin enforcing financial sanctions and an arms embargo laid down in resolution 1718. That agreement ended a week-long deadlock on the issue.

“The Security Council condemns the 5 April 2009 launch by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, which is in contravention of Security Council resolution 1718 of 2006,” the statement said.

The United States, Japan and South Korea have repeatedly said that North Korea on April 5 launched a long-range ballistic missile, not a satellite as it insists, in violation of Security Council resolution 1718 banning such launches.

Japan had been pushing for a council resolution that would declare Pyongyang in violation of that resolution. But China and Russia, which have vetoes on the council, opposed this. They were not convinced the rocket launch was a violation.

China insisted instead that the council adopt a “cautious and proportionate” presidential statement, which is a formal statement of the council’s position by its president. Statements must be adopted unanimously but are generally seen as weaker than resolutions.

Some analysts have questioned whether official council statements are binding, but the US, British and French delegations have insisted that all decisions by the council are binding, regardless of how they are issued.

Resolution 1718 was passed after a nuclear test by Pyongyang in October 2006. It forbids North Korea from launching ballistic missiles or carrying out further nuclear tests. It also bans the import or export of arms and related goods by Pyongyang.

The statement also called for Pyongyang to return to stalled six-party talks aimed at ending its nuclear program and demanded that it refrain from any further launches. The talks group North and South Korea, China, Russia, Japan and the United States.

Analysts say that the passage of the council statement will be largely symbolic and is unlikely to result in a strict enforcement of sanctions against Pyongyang.