FACTBOX – Key points of nuclear non-proliferation declaration

A nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty review conference declaration was agreed by consensus by 189 nations on Friday. It was the first agreement by the pact’s signatories at a treaty review conference in 10 years.

Following are key “follow-on actions” included in the declaration:

* NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT

The five official nuclear weapons states — the United States, Russia, Britain, France and China — “commit to undertake further efforts to reduce and ultimately eliminate all types of nuclear weapons.” But no timetable for doing so is specified.

* SECURITY ASSURANCES

Signatories agreed that the Geneva-based Conference on Disarmament should “immediately begin discussion of effective international arrangements to assure non-nuclear-weapon states against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons.”

* NUCLEAR TESTING

Nuclear weapons states undertake to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty “with all expediency.” The United states and China have not ratified the treaty, meaning it cannot yet enter into force. Until it does so, all states commit to refrain from nuclear test explosions.

* FISSILE MATERIALS

States agree that the Conference on Disarmament should “immediately begin negotiation of a treaty banning the production of fissile material.”

* NON-PROLIFERATION

The conference urged Israel, India and Pakistan to accede to the NPT treaty.

* NUCLEAR ENERGY

The conference urged states “to facilitate … the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.”

* MIDDLE EAST WEAPONS-OF-MASS-DESTRUCTION-FREE ZONE

The conference said U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and key states “will convene a conference in 2012, to be attended by all states of the Middle East, on the establishment of a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction.”

* NORTH KOREA

The conference “strongly urged” North Korea to carry out “the complete and verifiable abandonment of all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs” and return to the NPT.

(Compiled by Patrick Worsnip; editing by Mohammad Zargham)

China’s North Korea strategy hemmed in by nucler test

China's North Korea strategy hemmed in by nucler testBeijing – North Korea’s latest nuclear test is a strong blow to China’s attempts to get its stubborn neighbour to consider nuclear disarmament, according to a Chinese expert on North Korea.

Several experts have begun to question whether North Korea ever intended to give up its nuclear weapons programme.

The programme “is a card for the DPRK (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea),” said Cai Jian, an expert on North Korea at Shanghai’s Fudan University.

“They want to gain security assurances and economic assistance by playing this card,” he said. Since North Korea’s first nuclear test in 2006, people realized that not only did Pyongyang see the nuclear issue as “a card to play,” but also had ambitions to become a nuclear power, he said.

As the only country that North Korea considers an ally, China has a unique role to play as an interlocutor between North Korea and the rest of the world. But that role also puts China into a dilemma.

Monday’s test indicates that China’s hands-off approach to North Korea, attempting to convince North Korea to give up its nuclear programme with persuasion and encouragement, is not working.

Nonetheless, despite calls for a harder line against Pyongyang, China watchers say Beijing will likely continue to walk a path of moderation.

“China’s position on the Korean issue is, first, to keep the DPRK stable and, second, to realize denuclearization in north-east Asia. China’s reaction will be based on these two points,” said Cai.

China’s strong economic ties to North Korea might give it the ability to apply some pressure. No country has more trade with North Korea. Trade climbed last year by 41 per cent to 2.8 billion dollars.

That might be very little compared with China’s 186 billion dollars of trade with South Korea, but the trade is vital to North Korea, with its huge population teetering on starvation.

Thus, applying too much pressure could destabilize the impoverished nation.

Plus, at the end of the day, China would still like to assist North Korea.

“China needs to balance stability and non-proliferation. This is not easy. This is really delicate,” he said, noting that China’s rulers fear nothing more than streams of starving refugees from North Korea.

At the same time, a nuclear test about 100 kilometres from China’s border can only be viewed as a provocation, even if the test was designed to draw the attention of US President Barack Obama.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Il has used the test to once again prove that he has no fear of China, especially since China has given him no reason to fear it. He has now given offense to China and let the most recent Chinese charm offensive stagnate.

That’s all the more shocking as this is the year that the two countries are celebrating 60 years of diplomatic ties with the proclamation of a year of friendship. Both sides were to trade visits between high-ranking officials. Now those plans might come to naught.

Instead, it took China’s Foreign Ministry more than nine hours to craft a response to the blast. When it finally came out, the response sounded helpless, reverting to China’s old tack of calling for the resumption of negotiations on demobilization of North Korea’s nuclear programme.(dpa)