Iranian planes are getting fuel: foreign ministry

(Reuters) – Iranian planes are getting fuel at airports around the world, Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said on Tuesday, denying reports that some countries were refusing supplies due to sanctions.

“No such limitation has been imposed,” he told a news conference, saying reports that fuel supplies had been blocked were part of a propaganda war against the Islamic Republic.

On Monday, the secretary of the Iranian Airlines Union was quoted on Iran’s ISNA news agency as saying Iranian planes had been refused fuel at airports in Britain, Germany and UAE because of U.S. sanctions.

The German Transport Ministry said there was no ban on refueling Iranian flights in Germany and a British government source said London was not aware of any cut to supplies and that any such a decision would be up to private companies.

A source in the UAE familiar with the issue said a private company there had refused to refuel an Iranian plane, but the UAE had imposed no ban of its own.

(Reporting by Robin Pomeroy; editing by David Stamp)

Iran planes are getting fuel — foreign ministry

July 6 (Reuters) – Iranian planes are getting fuel at airports around the world, Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said on Tuesday, denying reports that some countries were refusing supplies due to sanctions. [ID:nLDE66418N]

“No such limitation has been imposed,” he told a news conference.

Iran’s Ahmadinejad says UN resolution “valuless”-report

June 9 (Reuters) – The new U.N. sanctions resolution against Iran has no value and should be thrown in the waste bin like a used handkerchief, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Wednesday.

“These resolutions have no value… It is like a used handkerchief that should be thrown in the waste bin,” he told reporters when asked about the fourth round of the U.N. Security Council sanctions resolution imposed on Iran.

He was speaking during a visit to Tajikstan. (Reporting by Roman Kozhevnikov, writing by Parisa Hafezi)

Iran and Russia clash in worst row for years

Iran and Russia clashed on Wednesday over Kremlin support for draft U.N. sanctions against the Islamic Republic, in one of the worst rows between the two powers since the Cold War.

The public clash indicates growing concern in Tehran after the United States said Russia and China, the closest thing Iran has to big-power allies, had agreed to a draft sanctions resolution to punish Iran over its nuclear programme.

In unusually strong criticism of Russia, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad admonished the Kremlin for bowing to what he said was U.S. pressure to agree sanctions and bluntly warned President Dmitry Medvedev to be more cautious.

“If I were the Russian president, when making decisions about subjects related to a great nation (Iran) … I would act more cautiously, I would think more,” Ahmadinejad said in a televised outdoor speech.

He said that Russian support for the United States was unacceptable and that Moscow should rethink its decision or face being viewed as an enemy by Tehran.

Within hours, the Kremlin’s top foreign policy adviser dismissed Ahmadinejad’s criticism, telling the Iranian president to refrain from “political demagoguery”.

“No one has ever managed to preserve one’s authority with political demagoguery. I am convinced, the thousand-year history of Iran itself is evidence of this,” Sergei Prikhodko said in a statement read out by a Kremlin spokeswoman.

“The Russian Federation is governed by its own long-term state interests. Our position is Russian: it reflects the interests of all the peoples of greater Russia and so it can be neither pro-American nor pro-Iranian,” he said.

ROW WITH RUSSIA

The spat between two of the world’s biggest energy producers — with a personal tirade by a president against a Kremlin leader — is the worst in many years, analysts said.

Though trade ties have grown over the past two decades, Russia is still regarded with deep distrust in Iran after several wars between Persia and the Tsarist Empire, followed by rocky relations with the atheist Soviet Union.

Russia has been dismayed by Tehran’s failure to disclose full details about its nuclear programme and diplomats say privately that Kremlin leaders have been burned several times while attempting to get Iranian leaders to resolve the dispute.

Prikhodko issued a clear rebuke to Tehran over its failure to allay fears about its nuclear programme.

“Any unpredictability, any political extremism, lack of transparency or inconsistency in taking decisions that affect and concern the entire world community is unacceptable for us,” he said.

“It would be good if those who are now speaking in the name of the wise people of Iran … would remember this.”

Since the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union, trade has grown, reaching $3 billion last year. Russia has struck deals to build Iran’s first nuclear power station and sell billions of dollars of weapons.

But the row with Moscow could hurt Russian plans to start the nuclear reactor at the Bushehr power plant in August and Iran is unlikely to see a Russian delivery of the S-300 surface-to-air missiles it agreed to sell Iran.

“Moscow has repeatedly saved Iran from very tough sanctions, so Ahmadinejad’s defiance is quite frankly out of place,” Pyotr Goncharov, a Moscow-based specialist on the Gulf, told Reuters.

“It is simply the latest attempt by the Iranian president to lay the blame for his own problems at someone else’s door.”

(Writing by Guy Faulconbridge in Moscow and Robin Pomeroy in Tehran, additional reporting by Denis Dyomkin and Moscow and Ramin Mostafavi in Tehran; editing by Andrew Roche)

Kremlin tells Iran to stop ‘political demagoguery’

The Kremlin’s chief foreign policy adviser on Wednesday told Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to refrain from “political demagoguery” after Tehran admonished Russia for supporting new sanctions.

The public clash came after Ahmadinejad chided Russia for bowing to U.S. pressure over new sanctions against Tehran and bluntly warned Kremlin chief Dmitry Medvedev to be more cautious.

But Medvedev’s top foreign policy advisor, Sergei Prikhodko, dismissed the criticism, saying Russia was neither pro-American nor pro-Iranian and that Moscow’s policy was governed by the national interest.

“No one has ever managed to preserve one’s authority with political demagoguery. I am convinced, the thousand-year history of Iran itself is evidence of this,” Prikhodko said in a statement.

“The Russian Federation is governed by its own long-term state interests. Our position is Russian: it reflects the interests of all the peoples of greater Russia and so it can be neither pro-American nor pro-Iranian,” he said.

In a clear rebuke to Tehran over its failure to allay fears about its nuclear programme, Prikhodko said that Russia could not accept inconsistency and a lack of transparency in resolving major world issues.

“Any unpredictability, any political extremism, lack of transparency or inconsistency in taking decisions that affect and concern the entire world community is unacceptable for us,” he said.

“It would be good if those who are now speaking in the name of the wise people of Iran… would remember this,” Prikhodko said.

(Reporting by Denis Dyomkin, writing by Guy Faulconbridge, editing by Conor Humphries)

Iran says to reconsider fuel swap if sanctions imposed

Iran will reconsider a nuclear fuel swap deal if world powers agree to impose further sanctions on the Islamic Republic, Interfax news agency quoted Tehran’s ambassador to Moscow as saying on Tuesday.

“If there are new sanctions, it will become obvious to the Iranian public that the “5 + 1″ group is hiding evil intentions and pursuing political objectives. This would force us to revise the Tehran accords,” Mahmoud Reza Sadjadi was quoted as saying.

Under the deal, agreed with Turkey and Brazil, Iran would send 1,200 kg of its low-enriched uranium (LEU) to Turkey in return for fuel rods to keep a Tehran medical research reactor running.

Western critics say the deal would still leave Iran with enough uranium for one bomb, as it has stockpiled more LEU since the idea was first proposed last year.

“We believe that by this (deal) Iran has demonstrated its goodwill,” Sadjadi said. “After all that lobbying by Brazil, Turkey and other countries, we believe that it makes no sense to talk about new sanctions.”

(Writing by Dmitry Solovyov, editing by Guy Faulconbridge)

Russia says enrichment still issue in Iran fuel swap

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said on Monday he was studying an Iranian fuel swap deal brokered by Brazil and Turkey but that questions remained, including whether Iran intended to continue enriching uranium.

“One question is: will Iran itself enrich uranium? As far as I understand from officials of that state, such work will be continued. In this case, of course, those concerns that the international community had before could remain,” Medvedev said.

Iran agreed with Brazil and Turkey on Monday that it would send some of its uranium abroad, abruptly ending its refusal to countenance such a deal just as the U.N. Security Council readied tougher sanctions.

“The question arises — is the level of this swap operation sufficient? Will all members of the international community be satisfied? I don’t know,” Medvedev said. “We need to see what follows this declaration.”

Medvedev said consultations were needed with Iran and all major powers involved in the negotiations about the Islamic Republic’s nuclear programme.

“After this, we need to decide what to do: Are those proposals sufficient or is something else needed? So I think a small pause on this problem would not do any harm,” he said.

Medvedev spoke by phone to Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva late on Monday to discuss the issue, the Kremlin said in a statement.

Medvedev “positively assessed joint efforts by Brazil and Turkey to promote a political and diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear problem,” the statement said.

“Russia will use all opportunities to support a joint search for, and the development of, a constructive resolution (to the Iranian nuclear problem) that satisfies the international community,” the statement said.

(Reporting by Denis Dyomkin, writing by Guy Faulconbridge and Conor Humphries, editing by Jon Boyle)

US imposes sanctions on India born Al-Qaeda supporter

The Obama Administration on Friday slapped sanctions on two Karachi-based Pakistani nationals, one of them was born in India, for allegedly providing financial support to terrorist activities of Al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

The two are identified as Mohammed Mazhar, the director of Al-Akhtar Trust, and and Mufti Abdul Rahim, leader of Al-Rashid Trust.

Mohammed Mazhar was designated for his fundraising activities and financial and other support for Al-Qaeda and the Taliban and Mufti Abdul Rahim was designated for his fundraising activities for the Taliban, the Department of Treasury said.

Al-Akhtar Trust and Al-Rashid Trust are both Pakistani charities previously identified as Specially Designated Global Terrorists pursuant to Executive Order 13224, which freezes any assets the designated entities and individuals have under US jurisdiction and prohibits Americans from engaging in any transactions with those entities and individuals.

“Today’s designation of these two high-profile financiers of Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, who are also leaders of Al-Akhtar Trust and Al-Rashid Trust, further exposes those organisations’ continuing support for terrorism under the guise of charitable activity,” Stuart Levey, Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, said.

Sinopec ships rare gasoline cargo Spore-Iran – trade

SINGAPORE/DUBAI April 14 (Reuters) – Sinopec Corp’s (0386.HK) trading arm Unipec is making a rare shipment of gasoline from Singapore to the Middle East that would probably go to Iran, industry sources said on Wednesday.

The cargo of around 250,000 barrels was scheduled to have loaded from Singapore on Tuesday, with options to discharge in the Gulf, according to shipping data obtained by Reuters. The shipment was likely to go to Iran, trade sources said.

“This is a rare shipment, not often you see this as economics seldom work,” a trader said.

Iran, the world’s fifth largest oil exporter, relies on the international market to secure 40 percent of its domestic gasoline requirements because it lacks the refining capacity to produce its own.

The threat of U.S. sanctions on fuel suppliers to Iran has reduced the pool of firms prepared to sell to the Islamic Republic. That may have encouraged Iran to look for fuel from further afield, traders said.

In Asia, poor gasoline demand has forced traders to look for destinations outside their typical trading sphere, they added. (Reporting by Seng Li Peng and Luke Pachymuthu; Editing by Simon Webb and James Jukwey)

Fevola cleared over nude Bingle photo

Brisbane Lions forward Brendan Fevola has escaped punishment over his involvement in the Lara Bingle nude photo affair, with the AFL concluding there is insufficient evidence to establish guilt.

AFL football operations general manager Adrian Anderson said while Fevola admitted taking the photograph, it could not be proved that he had distributed it to other players.

“Given the evidence currently available to us and the time elapsed since the alleged behaviour, the AFL has not established that a breach of our rules has occurred,” he said.

“However, we will continue to monitor whether there are legal proceedings arising from this matter and the AFL remains willing to speak with Ms Bingle.”

The investigation by the AFL’s manager of integrity services, Brett Clothier, and cultural strategy and education manager, Sue Clark, followed claims Fevola took a nude photograph of Bingle during their brief relationship in 2006 and distributed it to other AFL players.

The former Carlton player was interviewed twice as part of the investigation while Bingle, through her lawyers, declined to speak directly with the AFL but provided a statutory declaration.

Mr Anderson said the AFL does not condone any behaviour which shows a lack of respect towards women.

“All AFL players and officials should be aware that taking and distributing private images without consent is unacceptable and can result in sanctions under the AFL player rules,” he said.

Iran says sanctions not to stop nuclear work-agency

TEHRAN, April 2 (Reuters) – International sanctions will not prevent Iran from pursuing its nuclear activities, said the country’s top nuclear negotiator on Friday, the official IRNA news agency reported.

“Iranians are familiar with sanctions … We consider sanctions as opportunities … We will continue our (nuclear) path more decisively,” Saeed Jalili was quoted by IRNA as saying in China.

The West accuses Iran of covertly trying to build nuclear weapons. Iran says its nuclear power is aimed at generating electricity.

The United States and its European allies want to curb the Islamic state’s nuclear activities and are pushing for new U.N.-backed sanctions against Tehran.

China, a veto-wielding member of the United Nations Security Council, has for months fended off the calls to back sanctions.

Jalili flew to Beijing on Thursday to hold talks with Chinese officials. Iran is a major oil supplier to China. (Writing by Parisa Hafezi; Editing by Jon Boyle)

Iran says sanctions not to stop nuclear work-agency

TEHRAN, April 2 (Reuters) – International sanctions will not prevent Iran from pursuing its nuclear activities, said the country’s top nuclear negotiator on Friday, the official IRNA news agency reported.

“Iranians are familiar with sanctions … We consider sanctions as opportunities … We will continue our (nuclear) path more decisively,” Saeed Jalili was quoted by IRNA as saying in China. (Writing by Parisa Hafezi; Editing by Jon Boyle)

China says wants peaceful solution to Iran nuclear dispute

Thu, Apr 1 12:47 PM

China will continue to seek peaceful solution to the Iran nuclear issue, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said on Thursday, after Beijing agreed to discussions on new sanctions on Tehran.

The United States and other Western powers have said China has agreed to serious negotiations about a proposed new U.N. Security Council resolution on Iran, which they say wants the means to make nuclear weapons.

China has been reluctant to back such sanctions and has repeatedly called for more diplomatic efforts to seek a solution. As a permanent member of the Security Council, Beijing has the power to veto any resolution.

(Reporting by Emma Graham-Harrison; editing by Ken Wills)

U.S, targets Iraqi with ties to al Qaeda network

The U.S. Treasury on Thursday levied sanctions against an Iraqi with ties to an al Qaeda-linked support network that Washington says is operating in Iraq.

The move bans Americans from dealing with Muthanna Harith al-Dari and seeks a freeze on any assets he has under U.S. jurisdiction, the department said. It added that the sanctions were carried out under a U.S. executive order that targets terrorists and those providing support to them.

Treasury said it targeted al-Dari for providing financial support and other services to al Qaeda in Iraq, including operational guidance for attacks against Iraqi Forces and Coalition Forces in Iraq.

The UN 1267 Committee, established by the Security Council to apply sanctions against al-Qaeda, the Taliban and their associates, added al-Dari on Thursday to its Consolidated List of individuals and entities linked to the two groups at the request of Iraq and the United States, Treasury said.

“We will continue our aggressive efforts to isolate those terrorist actors and networks that seek to threaten the stability of Iraq,” Stuart Levey, Treasury’s undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, said.

Treasury said al-Dari was born in Iraq.

(Reporting by Nancy Waitz; editing by Paul Simao)

Q+A – What do we know about Myanmar’s election?

Myanmar’s top generals will attend the annual Armed Forces Day parade on Saturday for the final time as the country’s leaders as the military prepares to hand over power to an elected civilian government.

The parade will be led by reclusive junta strongman Than Shwe, who says the military top brass will become civilians after this year’s long-awaited election. Few, however, believe the military will really transfer power.

WHY IS MYANMAR HOLDING ELECTIONS?

Sanctions have crippled the resource-rich country, which was the world’s top rice exporter when it won independence from Britain in 1948 after more than 120 years of colonial rule.

Although Asian trade is picking up, particularly with China, the regime’s refusal to release political prisoners and halt human rights abuses have made it a pariah in the West.

Analysts say Myanmar wants to join the global economy and attract investment. The generals know they must give up power — nominally at least — to achieve this, but they appear to believe the military is the only institution capable of running the country.

WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE POLLS?

No date has been set for the elections but the generals have unveiled laws governing how the vote will be conducted and who can stand. An election commission comprising people “prominent and of good reputation” has been appointed.

Analysts and Western diplomats believe the junta is holding out on a date to try to get rebellious ethnic groups to take part in the process in an effort to show the country is united. The participation of the big ethnic groups is unlikely.

There is wide speculation the vote will take place sometime in October on a date deemed auspicious to the notoriously superstitious generals.

WHO WILL HOLD POWER?

A constitution approved in a disputed 2008 referendum stipulates Myanmar will be run by an elected civilian government, but key ministries such as justice, defence and the interior will be under the control of the military, which will also be granted a quarter of the 440 seats in parliament.

The army commander will remain the country’s most powerful figure, senior to an elected president, able to appoint key ministers and with authority to assume power “in times of emergency”.

Than Shwe has said his inner circle of army generals will fade from the political scene, but analysts expect them or their proxies to continue to pull the strings.

Than Shwe and Maung Aye, another ageing strongman, will probably retire and hand power to army proteges who will ensure they are insulated from any future recriminations. Junta number three Thura Shwe Mann, 62, is widely tipped to take the top post.

WHY IS AUNG SAN SUU KYI SIDELINED?

The hugely popular Suu Kyi, daughter of independence hero Aung San, remains the biggest threat to the military. Her National League for Democracy (NLD) party won the 1990 poll in a landslide, a result the regime ignored and recently annulled.

Because of her rousing speeches, ability to mobilise pro-democracy activists and popular appeal among more than a dozen armed ethnic groups who deeply resent the Burmese generals, the junta has kept her in detention for 15 of the past 21 years.

It is unlikely she will be freed before the polls, for fear of her influence on the public.

Detained or not, she is unable to run because her late husband was a foreigner, and because of the British citizenship of her children and her criminal record.

WHO WILL BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PART?

The junta recognises 10 political parties. The NLD, the National Unity Party and the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy were the top three in the 1990 polls. The NLD plans to announce on March 29 if it will run or not.

There are divisions inside the NLD between those who reject the constitution and modernisers who believe a boycott could render the NLD a spent force. Suu Kyi said on March 23 she wouldn’t dream of registering the NLD for the elections, although she also said the decision was not hers to make.

The junta will probably have its own nominee parties fronted by cronies and civilian proxies. With more than 2,000 political activists in prison — and barred from running even if released — the polls will inevitably be far from inclusive.

Two new parties have registered so far, both of them seen as close to the junta. They are the 88 Generation Students of the Union of Myanmar (GSUM) and the Union of Myanmar National Political Force (UMNPF).

WILL THE WEST MAINTAIN SANCTIONS?

Due to the junta’s refusal to free political prisoners and the restrictive election laws, the West is unlikely to lift sanctions, even if the vote is deemed free and fair.

But many pro-democracy advocates say sanctions have been counterproductive, serving only to impoverish the people and make the junta more hidebound. An election that brings change without a full transition to democracy would sharpen the debate over whether sanctions should be removed.

Engagement by Asian neighbours, especially on trade, has done nothing to loosen the junta’s grip on power.

(Editing by Alan Raybould and David Fox)

U.N. set for more discreet talks with Taliban: envoys

(Reuters) – U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon suggested in a new report on Afghanistan that the United Nations is ready to continue informal talks with the Taliban but the contact must be discreet, diplomats said.

World

The 15-nation U.N. Security Council will discuss Ban’s report on Thursday and vote next week on his recommendation to renew the mandate of the U.N. mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) for another 12 months.

Ban said UNAMA’s mandate “allows it to provide good offices to support the implementation of Afghan-led reconciliation programs” with which President Hamid Karzai is trying to reach out and offer an amnesty to Taliban insurgents.

“It (UNAMA) can also lend its good offices … to these efforts based on the consent of the parties concerned, although the nature of the task could initially require discretion and flexibility,” said the report, obtained by Reuters on Monday.

Several U.N. diplomats said this language amounted to a request for a green light from the council for UNAMA officials to continue informal talks with the Taliban, as long as the contact supported the efforts of the Afghan government.

They said the requirement for “discretion and flexibility” meant that information might be kept confidential and left out of formal U.N. briefings.

“It’s a request for an explicit implicit wink from the council” to allow secret political talks with the Taliban to continue, one U.N. diplomat said.

The issue of speaking with the Taliban is a sensitive one, since the group has been subject to U.N. sanctions since 1999.

But diplomats said the former U.N. special envoy to Afghanistan, Kai Eide, had been repeatedly in contact with the Taliban, despite his denial of reports that he met with Taliban representatives in the Middle East earlier this year.

One U.N. diplomat dismissed Eide’s denials, saying he “did talk with the Taliban, and on more than one occasion.”

U.S. CAUTIOUS ON TALIBAN TALKS

Another Western diplomat said key members of the NATO coalition that has troops fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan were aware of Eide’s contacts and were not opposed to them.

“We just want to make sure that they’re coordinated with the Afghan government and that no one’s running their own negotiations,” the Western diplomat said, adding the Security Council was likely to give Ban the green light he was seeking.

The new U.N. envoy, Swedish diplomat Staffan de Mistura, who arrived in Kabul to take up his post over the weekend, is expected to continue Eide’s contact with the Taliban.

There is some support among NATO member states for Karzai’s reconciliation programs. Last week, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband urged the Afghans to push hard for a peace settlement with the Taliban.

But the United States is cautious about reconciliation, not wanting to move ahead full steam until it feels there is a strong perception it is beating the Taliban militarily as a result of President Barack Obama’s new Afghan policy, which included a “surge” of an extra 30,000 U.S. troops.

Ban’s report also confirmed the security situation in Afghanistan had deteriorated to the point where 2009 was the most volatile year since a U.S.-led invasion toppled the Taliban in 2001.

It said the number of civilians killed last year rose 14 percent over 2008 to 2,412, most of them by “anti-government elements” such as the Taliban.

It also warned against a “militarization of the overall effort in Afghanistan” and called for many non-military tasks to be handed over to Afghan civilian institutions.

(Additional reporting by Sue Pleming in Washington; Editing by John O’Callaghan)

China cites technical hitches for not supporting ban on Jaish.

New Delhi, Aug.13 (ANI): China continues to remain reluctant about supporting India’s proposal at the United Nations to place sanctions on the Jaish-e-Mohammad.

ANI has learnt that in the recent meeting between the Special Representatives of the two countries led by National Security Adviser M K Narayanan and Chinese State Councillor Dai Bingguo, the Chinese Representative cited “technical” reasons for not supporting the ban on the Jaish-e-Mohammad.

China is the only country in the Security Council which is blocking sanctions on the Jaish and its chief Maulana Masood Azhar.

New Delhi’s argument has been that Azhar benefited from a terror act – the hijacking of IC 814 – and, therefore, there can be no objections on the grounds of evidence.

According to sources, during the 13th round of Special Representatives talks in New Delhi, India handed over more details and documents about Azhar which establish that he is a terrorist.

Beijing’s response, however, was tepid.

India has already submitted detailed documents on the Jaish-e-Mohammad’s terrorist activities to the United Nations, which in turn has been circulated to other nations, including China.

Beijing, however, has been denial mode about receiving the document.

The Maulana Masood Azhar led Jaish-e-Mohammed is a Pakistan based terrorist organization which has orchestrated series of attacks against India.

Once sanctions on an individual or the origination are imposed under UN resolution 1267 which is also known as Al qaeeda and Taliban sanctions, it empowers India to demand action from Pakistan.

After being released from the Indian jail, Masood has been seen in various Pakistani cities addressing huge congregations and is reportedly living undercover within the patronage of the ISI.

Security experts believe that Pakistan is using its close tactical and strategic relations with China to block India’s attempts in the UNSC to ban the Jaish-e-Mohammad.

Earlier, the United Kingdom had shown reluctance to support the ban on the Jaish, but once India submitted details about the group, it agreed to come onboard and support the ban. By Naveen Kapoor (ANI)

Iran preparing package for talks with West

Washington, July 11 (ANI): Iran is preparing its stands on political, security and international issues so that they can become a basis for talks with the West and calm down the mounting international pressure.

“The package can be a good basis for talks with the West. The package will contain Iran’s stances on political, security and international issues,” a foreign news agency quoted Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, as saying.

On Friday, US President Barack Obama said the international community is “not going to just wait indefinitely” for Iran to renounce an interest in developing nuclear weapons.

Speaking as the G-8 summit concluded in Italy, Obama stressed that he and others were not looking for their summit partners to embrace sanctions at this week’s meeting.

Obama said G-8 leaders voiced their concern about what he calls the “appalling” events surrounding the recent elections and the violence that followed, FOX News reported.

The leaders assembled at L’Aquila also addressed the threat of nuclear proliferation in Iran, he said, with a strong statement calling on Iran to fulfill its responsibilities without delay.

“If Iran chooses not to walk through that door, then you have on record the G-8 to begin with and, I think, potentially a lot of other countries … ,” Obama said.

Obama said his hope is that the Iranian leadership will recognize that world opinion is clear.

Mottaki said on Saturday that Iran had not received “any new message” from the summit.

“We have not received any new message from the G-8. But based on the news we have received, they had different views on different issues which did not lead to a unanimous agreement in some areas,” Mottaki said. (ANI)

US freezes assets of LeT operatives linked with Mumbai attacks

Washington, July 2 (ANI): The United States has decided to freeze the assets of three Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) commanders, who were supposedly behind the November 2008 Mumbai carnage.

Sanctions would also be imposed on an Al-Qaeda backer, Ameen Al-Peshawari, The Nation reports.

According to the US Treasury, three top LeT commanders, Arif Qasmani, Mohammed Yahya Mujahid, and Nasir Javaid played an important role in the Mumbai terror attack.

Sources said Qasmani is chief coordinator of LeT, while Mujahid heads the media wing of the banned terror outfit.

Qasmani has also been linked to the July 2006 Mumbai train bombing in which 186 people were killed, and the Samjhouta Express blast that killed 68 persons.

The US’ decision to ban the LeT and Al-Qaeda operatives comes days after the United Nations (UN) added Al-Peshawari, Qasmani and Mujahid to its blacklist, which includes many other Al-Qaeda and Taliban operatives.

A statement issued by the US Treasury asked all the member nations of the UN to freeze the assets of all the persons listed by it, and impose other sanctions also.

“All UN member states are obligated to freeze the funds and other assets of listed individuals and entities included on the blacklist, and to apply other sanctions such as travel ban and arms embargo,” the statement said. (ANI)