Iran says nuclear talks after Ramadan

(Reuters) – Iran will be ready to hold negotiations with world powers on its nuclear program after the month of Ramadan ends in early September, Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said on Sunday.

Separately, Mottaki said technical discussions could begin immediately in Vienna on the details of a proposed nuclear fuel swap and a letter to this effect would be delivered to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Monday.

The West fears Iran’s secretive uranium enrichment program is a veiled quest to develop nuclear weapons capability. Tehran denies this, saying it seeks only electricity from enrichment so it can export more of its oil wealth.

Mottaki said the talks after Ramadan would be between Tehran and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France — as well as Germany (P5+1) who have been locked in a protracted standoff with Iran over its nuclear ambitions.

“That belongs to 5+1 with Iran,” he said of the talks.

Earlier on Sunday, Mottaki met the foreign ministers of Turkey and Brazil, their first meeting since the three struck a tentative swap accord in May that failed to prevent fresh U.N. sanctions against Iran.

Brazil and Turkey have characterized the proposed fuel deal as a way to build confidence for the broader negotiations involving the six world powers, represented for now by the EU’s foreign policy chief, on an overall nuclear settlement.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said earlier Mottaki had confirmed Iran was ready to start negotiations with Catherine Ashton, the EU foreign affairs chief.

Ashton wrote to Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili last month inviting him to resume negotiations. The Muslim fasting month of Ramadan ends in the first half of September.

EXPANDED SANCTIONS

Iran agreed in May to send some of its enrichment uranium stockpile abroad in exchange for medical reactor fuel, reviving a deal in principle which the IAEA, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, brokered in October, only to see Tehran back out of it.

The May accord, which has not been carried out, failed to prevent fresh sanctions from the United Nations, European Union and United States adopted over the past two months.

But Davutoglu has said he still saw a chance of Iran carrying out the swap on the basis of their agreement and said Iran would propose in its letter to the IAEA that “technical negotiations” begin as soon as possible.

Under the May deal, Iran agreed to transfer 1,200 kg (2,646 lb) of low-enriched uranium (LEU) to Turkey within a month and in return receive, within a year, 120 kg of 20 percent-enriched uranium to keep Tehran’s medical research reactor running.

But Western diplomats have dismissed the revived plan.

They said that removing from Iran 1,200 kg — enough, if highly enriched, to make an atom bomb — was less significant than when it was first brokered in October because Iran’s LEU stockpile had doubled in the interim.

At the time of the original October pact, 1,200 kg comprised about 70 percent of Iran’s known LEU reserve.

The Security Council imposed a fourth round of sanctions on Iran in June. Brazil and Turkey voted against, irked by the West’s dismissal of their deal which they said obviated the need for any more sanctions.

(Reporting by Simon Cameron-Moore, writing by Daren Butler; Editing by Mark Heinrich and Jon Boyle)

Iran favors talks with EU after Ramadan – Turkey

(Reuters) – Iran has expressed willingness to have talks with the European Union on its nuclear program after the month of Ramadan ends in early September, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said on Sunday.

He also said after a meeting with his Iranian and Brazilian counterparts that Iran would send a letter on Monday to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) asking for a start to separate “technical” talks on implementing a nuclear fuel swap.

The West fears Iran’s secretive uranium enrichment program is a veiled quest to develop nuclear weapons capability. Tehran denies this, saying it seeks only electricity from enrichment so it can export more of its oil wealth.

Brazil and Turkey have characterized the proposed fuel deal as a way to build confidence for broader negotiations involving six world powers, represented for now by the EU’s foreign policy chief, on an overall nuclear settlement with Iran.

“The Iranian Foreign Minister confirmed once again they are ready to start negotiations with Mrs Ashton… (He) stated that immediately after Ramadan they would start with negotiations,” Davutoglu said, adding they could meet in Istanbul.

Catherine Ashton, the EU foreign affairs chief, wrote to Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili last month inviting him to resume negotiations. The Muslim fasting month of Ramadan ends in the first half of September.

EXPANDED SANCTIONS

Davutoglu spoke after a meeting with foreign ministers Manouchehr Mottaki of Iran and Celso Amorim of Brazil, their first since the three struck a tentative swap accord in May that failed to prevent fresh U.N. sanctions against Iran.

Iran agreed in May to send some of its enrichment uranium stockpile abroad in exchange for medical reactor fuel, reviving a deal in principle which the IAEA, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, brokered in October, only to see Tehran back out of it.

The May accord, which has not been carried out, failed to prevent fresh sanctions from the United Nations, European Union and United States adopted over the past two months.

But Davutoglu has said he still saw a chance of Iran carrying out the swap on the basis of their agreement and said Iran would propose in its letter to the IAEA that “technical negotiations” begin as soon as possible.

He was referring to the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France — as well as Germany who have been locked in a protracted standoff with Iran over its nuclear ambitions.

Under the May deal, Iran agreed to transfer 1,200 kg (2,646 lb) of low-enriched uranium (LEU) to Turkey within a month and in return receive, within a year, 120 kg of 20 percent-enriched uranium to keep Tehran’s medical research reactor running.

But Western diplomats have dismissed the revived plan.

They said that removing from Iran 1,200 kg — enough, if highly enriched, to make an atom bomb — was less significant than when it was first brokered in October because Iran’s LEU stockpile had doubled in the interim.

At the time of the original October pact, 1,200 kg comprised about 70 percent of Iran’s known LEU reserve.

The Security Council imposed a fourth round of sanctions on Iran in June. Brazil and Turkey voted “no,” irked by the West’s dismissal of their deal which they said obviated the need for any more sanctions.

(Reporting by Simon Cameron-Moore, writing by Daren Butler; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

Gates disappointed by Turkey vote on Iran sanctions

June 11 (Reuters) – U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Friday he was disappointed by Turkey’s decision to vote against a U.N. Security Council resolution on sanctions against Iran but said it would not affect U.S.-Turkish military cooperation.

“I was disappointed by the Turkey vote in the Iranian sanctions. That said, Turkey is a decades-long ally of the United States and other members of NATO,” Gates said after a meeting of NATO defence ministers in Brussels.

“Turkey continues to play a critical part in the alliance,” he said.

Turkey, a key NATO member, joined Brazil in voting against the U.N. resolution on Wednesday, but the resolution still passed and the world powers are moving ahead with tighter sanctions on Tehran.

Analysis: Iran spy ring reports set off Gulf Arab alarm bells

(Reuters) – Gulf Arab states, hosts to U.S. and Western military bases, fear the discovery of a purported Iranian spy ring in Kuwait will make it harder to stay out of the fray of any conflict over Iran’s nuclear program.

World

The ensuing tensions following the Kuwaiti arrests, details of which remain scant, may further polarize Gulf states against non-Arab rival Tehran as a global row over Iran’s nuclear ambitions heats up.

News of the round-up, if proven, could also prompt security clampdowns by Gulf states aimed at ferreting out any more potential spies governments fear may be scouring their land for retaliatory targets in the event of a U.S. strike on Iran.

“What they are searching for is not being caught in the crossfire of a potential military strike on Iran,” said Theodore Karasik of the Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis.

“When you have the presence of spy rings and this drifting more toward the western position, it makes the situation a little more dangerous,” he said.

Tehran denies running spies in Kuwait, whose ties with the Islamic Republic have improved after turning poisonous during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war over Kuwait’s backing of Iraq.

The West suspects Iran, just across the water from the Western-allied Gulf states, is seeking nuclear weapons capability. The United Nations imposed this week new sanctions against Iran, which says it wants only to generate electricity.

But if diplomacy fails, neither the United States nor Israel, the only assumed nuclear power in the Middle East, have ruled out military action. That spells danger for oil-exporting Gulf states, as Iran has threatened to hit back at Israel and U.S. bases in the Gulf if attacked.

The United States has already grown its land- and sea-based missile defense systems in several Gulf countries to counter what it sees as Iran’s growing missile threat.

“These (Gulf Arab) countries now are assuming that definitely the (Iranian) revolutionary guard is already there in their country,” Mustafa Alani of the Gulf Research Center said.

“If it (the Kuwait accusation) is proven … I think we are going to witness a major close look by intelligence in each country,” he added.

The United States has myriad air and naval installations in Gulf Arab states, some of which are little more than 200 km (124 miles) from Iran’s coast. The U.S. Central Command keeps its forward headquarters in Qatar, and Bahrain hosts the U.S. Navy’s

Kuwait hosts Camp Arifjan, a vast U.S. logistics base in the desert south of the capital that serves as a staging ground for U.S. forces deploying in Iraq.

TENSE TIES

Kuwaiti media said in May authorities had detained a number of people — Kuwaitis and foreigners — suspected of spying for Iran, and the independent al-Qabas daily said they were accused of gathering information on military sites in Kuwait.

Kuwait, which has banned media coverage of the case, has said only that it was holding several people in an unspecified security probe and that details published in the media were inaccurate. It has not clarified the matter.

That the arrests happened in Kuwait, whose ties with Iran were among the better in the region, could spread alarm for other Gulf states whose own relations with Iran are more tense.

Saudi Arabia, home to Islam’s holiest site, sees Tehran as a rival for regional sway, and a dispute between Iran and the United Arab Emirates over three Gulf islands picked up steam in recent months, despite strong trade ties between the states.

Bahrain had a brief spat last year with Tehran after an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was quoted as saying Iran had sovereignty over the tiny kingdom, where a Sunni family rules over a Shi’ite majority.

“The fear is that (if it were) equipped with a nuclear bomb, Iran will be able to fulfill its self-perception as the region’s powerhouse to be able to bully the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) states at its will,” IHS Global Insight Middle East analyst Gala Riani said.

“In the case of an Israeli attack on Iran, the GCC states would likely fall back on their well-versed quietist approach, with their priority being to avoid inflaming the situation,” Riani said. “Privately some of them might welcome an attack that could retard the Iranian nuclear program.”

Sunni-led Gulf countries, with often significant and marginalized Shi’ite minorities, also worry about Iran’s sway on their own Shi’ite populations. If the existence of an Iranian spy ring in Kuwait is proven, Gulf states could respond harshly.

A diplomat familiar with the investigation said the ring was made up of eight people — all Shi’ites — including Kuwaitis, Lebanese and Bahrainis.

Kuwait has in the past arrested Shi’ites for alleged plots in the 1980s to destabilize the country, including an attempt to kill Kuwait’s ruler and the hijacking of a Kuwaiti plane to demand the release of Shi’ite prisoners.

Kuwait deported some 27,000 expatriates, mostly Iranians, in 1985 and 1986 and stepped up security after Tehran fired missiles at its oil installations and attacked Kuwaiti tankers.

Analysts said Gulf states could slap entry or residency restrictions on Iranian expatriates, several hundred thousand of whom live in Gulf states. Some could be selectively deported.

But Iran, whose foreign ministry has said the reports were an attempt by enemies such as Israel to sow regional division, was likely to feel it had to watch its back.

“They have to collect information on the American bases or the capabilities of the GCC states because they can see on the horizon there is something going to happen sooner or later,” said Alani of the Gulf Research Center.

But a senior Arab diplomat in Riyadh said reports about the spy cell’s size and importance may have been exaggerated, and cited a “general paranoia” over Iran’s role in the region.

“But if this affair gets confirmed, it will also prompt predominantly Sunni Arab countries to put their Shi’ite community under greater scrutiny,” he said.

(Additional reporting by Fredrik Dahl and Martin Dokoupil in Dubai, Souhail Karam in Riyadh; Editing by Samia Nakhoul)

ANALYSIS-Iran spy ring reports set off Gulf Arab alarm bells

DUBAI, June 11 (Reuters) – Gulf Arab states, hosts to U.S. and Western military bases, fear the discovery of a purported Iranian spy ring in Kuwait will make it harder to stay out of the fray of any conflict over Iran’s nuclear programme.

The ensuing tensions following the Kuwaiti arrests, details of which remain scant, may further polarise Gulf states against non-Arab rival Tehran as a global row over Iran’s nuclear ambitions heats up.

News of the round-up, if proven, could also prompt security clampdowns by Gulf states aimed at ferreting out any more potential spies governments fear may be scouring their land for retaliatory targets in the event of a U.S. strike on Iran.

“What they are searching for is not being caught in the crossfire of a potential military strike on Iran,” said Theodore Karasik of the Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis.

“When you have the presence of spy rings and this drifting more towards the western position, it makes the situation a little more dangerous,” he said.

Tehran denies running spies in Kuwait, whose ties with the Islamic Republic have improved after turning poisonous during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war over Kuwait’s backing of Iraq.

The West suspects Iran, just across the water from the Western-allied Gulf states, is seeking nuclear weapons capability. The United Nations imposed this week new sanctions against Iran, which says it wants only to generate electricity.

But if diplomacy fails, neither the United States nor Israel, the only assumed nuclear power in the Middle East, have ruled out military action. That spells danger for oil-exporting Gulf states, as Iran has threatened to hit back at Israel and U.S. bases in the Gulf if attacked.

The United States has already grown its land- and sea-based missile defence systems in several Gulf countries to counter what it sees as Iran’s growing missile threat.

“These (Gulf Arab) countries now are assuming that definitely the (Iranian) revolutionary guard is already there in their country,” Mustafa Alani of the Gulf Research Centre said.

“If it (the Kuwait accusation) is proven … I think we are going to witness a major close look by intelligence in each country,” he added.

The United States has myriad air and naval installations in Gulf Arab states, some of which are little more than 200 km (124 miles) from Iran’s coast. The U.S. Central Command keeps its forward headquarters in Qatar, and Bahrain hosts the U.S. Navy’s

Kuwait hosts Camp Arifjan, a vast U.S. logistics base in the desert south of the capital that serves as a staging ground for U.S. forces deploying in Iraq.

TENSE TIES

Kuwaiti media said in May authorities had detained a number of people — Kuwaitis and foreigners — suspected of spying for Iran, and the independent al-Qabas daily said they were accused of gathering information on military sites in Kuwait.

Kuwait, which has banned media coverage of the case, has said only that it was holding several people in an unspecified security probe and that details published in the media were inaccurate. It has not clarified the matter.

That the arrests happened in Kuwait, whose ties with Iran were among the better in the region, could spread alarm for other Gulf states whose own relations with Iran are more tense.

Saudi Arabia, home to Islam’s holiest site, sees Tehran as a rival for regional sway, and a dispute between Iran and the United Arab Emirates over three Gulf islands picked up steam in recent months, despite strong trade ties between the states.

Bahrain had a brief spat last year with Tehran after an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was quoted as saying Iran had sovereignty over the tiny kingdom, where a Sunni family rules over a Shi’ite majority.

“The fear is that (if it were) equipped with a nuclear bomb, Iran will be able to fulfil its self-perception as the region’s powerhouse to be able to bully the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) states at its will,” IHS Global Insight Middle East analyst Gala Riani said.

“In the case of an Israeli attack on Iran, the GCC states would likely fall back on their well-versed quietist approach, with their priority being to avoid inflaming the situation,” Riani said. “Privately some of them might welcome an attack that could retard the Iranian nuclear programme.”

Sunni-led Gulf countries, with often significant and marginalised Shi’ite minorities, also worry about Iran’s sway on their own Shi’ite populations. If the existence of an Iranian spy ring in Kuwait is proven, Gulf states could respond harshly.

A diplomat familiar with the investigation said the ring was made up of eight people — all Shi’ites — including Kuwaitis, Lebanese and Bahrainis.

Kuwait has in the past arrested Shi’ites for alleged plots in the 1980s to destabilise the country, including an attempt to kill Kuwait’s ruler and the hijacking of a Kuwaiti plane to demand the release of Shi’ite prisoners.

Kuwait deported some 27,000 expatriates, mostly Iranians, in 1985 and 1986 and stepped up security after Tehran fired missiles at its oil installations and attacked Kuwaiti tankers.

Analysts said Gulf states could slap entry or residency restrictions on Iranian expatriates, several hundred thousand of whom live in Gulf states. Some could be selectively deported.

But Iran, whose foreign ministry has said the reports were an attempt by enemies such as Israel to sow regional division, was likely to feel it had to watch its back.

“They have to collect information on the American bases or the capabilities of the GCC states because they can see on the horizon there is something going to happen sooner or later,” said Alani of the Gulf Research Centre.

But a senior Arab diplomat in Riyadh said reports about the spy cell’s size and importance may have been exaggerated, and cited a “general paranoia” over Iran’s role in the region.

“But if this affair gets confirmed, it will also prompt predominantly Sunni Arab countries to put their Shi’ite community under greater scrutiny,” he said.

(Additional reporting by Fredrik Dahl and Martin Dokoupil in Dubai, Souhail Karam in Riyadh; Editing by Samia Nakhoul)

Obama: U.N. sanctions “unmistakable message” to Iran

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama on Wednesday said fresh U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran send an “unmistakable message” to that country over its nuclear program.

Barack Obama

“This resolution will put in place the toughest sanctions ever faced by the Iranian government,” Obama said after the 15-nation council passed a fourth round of sanctions against Iran, which the West suspects of developing the means to build atom bombs.

“It sends an unmistakable message about the international community’s commitment to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons,” he told reporters at the White House.

The resolution followed five months of talks between the United States, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia.

With 12 votes in favor, it received the least support of the four Iran sanctions resolutions adopted since 2006, but Obama vowed to make them stick.

“We will ensure that these sanctions are vigorously enforced, just as we continue to refine and enforce our own sanctions on Iran,” he said.

“There is no double standard at play here. We’ve made it clear, time and again, that we respect Iran’s right, like all countries, to access peaceful nuclear energy,” Obama said.

(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Jackie Frank)

Russia says U.N. Iran sanctions exclude use of force

June 9 (Reuters) – Russia’s Foreign Ministry said that U.N. sanctions against Iran agreed on Wednesday rule out the possibility of using force.

“All the measures, signed today in the resolution … exclude the possibility of employing force,” the ministry said in a statement on its website mid.ru.

“Nothing in the resolution’s text gives ground for taking measures or actions … including the use of force or the threat of force,” it said.

(Reporting by Amie Ferris-Rotman and Ludmila Danilova)

Obama: UN sanctions “unmistakable message” to Iran

WASHINGTON, June 9 (Reuters) – U.S. President Barack Obama on Wednesday said fresh U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran send an “unmistakable message” to that country over its nuclear program.

“This resolution will put in place the toughest sanctions ever faced by the Iranian government,” Obama said after the 15-nation council passed a fourth round of sanctions against Iran, which the West suspects of developing the means to build atom bombs.

“It sends an unmistakable message about the international community’s commitment to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons,” he told reporters at the White House.

The resolution followed five months of talks between the United States, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia.

With 12 votes in favor, it received the least support of the four Iran sanctions resolutions adopted since 2006, but Obama vowed to make them stick.

“We will ensure that these sanctions are vigorously enforced, just as we continue to refine and enforce our own sanctions on Iran,” he said.

“There is no double standard at play here. We’ve made it clear, time and again, that we respect Iran’s right, like all countries, to access peaceful nuclear energy,” Obama said.

(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Jackie Frank)

Obama: UN sanctions send “unmistakable message” to Iran

June 9 (Reuters) – U.S. President Barack Obama said on Wednesday that fresh U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran send an “unmistakable message” to the country over its nuclear program.

“We recognise Iran’s rights, but with those rights come responsibilites,” Obama said after the 15-nation council earlier passed a fourth round of sanctions against Iran over a nuclear program the West suspects is aimed at developing the means to build atom bombs.

(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Jackie Frank)

White House: still open to talks with Iran

June 9 (Reuters) – The White House said on Wednesday that the United States was still open to talks with Iran following fresh U.N. Security Council sanctions against the country over its nuclear program.

“The United States remains open to dialogue, but Iran must live up to its obligations and clearly demonstrate to the international community the peaceful nature of its nuclear activities,” the White House said in a statement.

The 15-nation council earlier passed a fourth round of sanctions against Iran over a nuclear program the West suspects is aimed at developing the means to build atom bombs. The resolution that was the product of five months of talks between the United States, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia.

(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Jackie Frank)

Q&A: Obama grapples with series of crises

(Reuters) – The diplomatic crisis over Israel’s raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla added to the pressures facing President Barack Obama, who is already grappling with a catastrophic oil spill and high unemployment at home.

U.S. | Green Business | Hot Stocks | Gulf Oil Spill

Here are some questions and answers about the challenges confronting Obama 16 months into his administration.

WHAT IS OBAMA’S MOST PRESSING PROBLEM?

Obama has said his highest priority is containing the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, rated the biggest in U.S. history.

Several efforts to plug the BP oil leak have failed. The Gulf region’s ecology and large seafood industry are at risk.

Obama, who has visited the Gulf Coast twice, is fighting accusations he reacted too slowly. He has sought to assert leadership on the calamity, telling the beleaguered Gulf Coast residents “the buck stops with me.”

HOW DOES THE GAZA RAID COMPLICATE OBAMA’S MIDEAST AGENDA?

The White House has reacted cautiously to the storming of a Turkish aid ship bound for Gaza, which has left nine dead and sparked an international outcry.

Close U.S. ally Israel has found itself increasingly isolated and the incident dealt a fresh setback to the latest effort to restart Israel-Palestinian peace talks.

Adding to the difficulties are recent strains in U.S.-Israeli relations.

Obama, who made Mideast diplomacy a major priority, had succeeded in reviving Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations through U.S.-mediated indirect talks. But there has been little or no progress and prospects look even more bleak after the flotilla incident.

The incident might also complicate Obama’s effort to secure new United Nations Security Council sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program.

HOW BIG A CONCERN IS THE U.S. ECONOMY?

The U.S. economy has shown signs of improvement in recent months in the aftermath of the 2008-2009 financial crisis.

But Americans are still struggling and the U.S. unemployment rate is 9.9 percent, near a 27-year high, posing political problems for Obama and his Democratic allies ahead of the November congressional elections.

An upcoming government report on the jobs market is expected to show a surge in hiring for the U.S. Census but private economists expect only a small drop in the unemployment rate to 9.8 percent.

Meanwhile, the administration is concerned about the potential fallout for the United States of the European debt crisis, which could dampen world growth and depress U.S. exports. In a worst-case scenario, it could result in a broader financial contagion.

HOW DOES THE U.S. DEFICIT COMPLICATE THE PICTURE?

The debt woes of countries like Greece, Spain and Portugal have put a spotlight on the U.S. budget deficit, which is projected to hit $1.6 trillion this year.

Republicans have attacked Obama over the red ink, labeling him a big spender. The White House counters that the deficits are a legacy of fiscal mismanagement under the Bush administration.

Some Democratic lawmakers have become more reticent about backing additional social safety-net spending amid indications U.S. voters are increasingly concerned about the deficit.

White House officials are debating how far to go in emphasizing a message of budgetary restraint when the lackluster pace of economic growth remains a pressing concern.

WHAT ABOUT OTHER ISSUES ON OBAMA’S DOMESTIC AGENDA?

Obama’s signed a landmark overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system into law in March, notching up a win on his top domestic priority.

But it is unclear how much the healthcare victory will help Democrats among voters in November. Republicans continue to attack the measure as an attempted government takeover of a key sector of the economy.

Obama’s plan to overhaul U.S. financial regulation looks likely to pass in the coming weeks, perhaps by July 4. A House-Senate panel is hammering out a final bill after separate measures have passed both houses of Congress.

WHAT ABOUT THE STANDOFF BETWEEN THE TWO KOREAS?

Mounting antagonism between North and South Korea threatens to complicate U.S. diplomatic efforts toward Pyongyang’s patron, China, which has responded cautiously to Seoul’s charge that the North torpedoed one of its warships. Washington is looking for ways to head off any possibility of a military confrontation.

WHERE DO THINGS STAND WITH THE WARS?

AFGHANISTAN – Obama ordered 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan in December in an effort to break the momentum of the Taliban. After making little progress, U.S. forces are preparing for a major offensive in the Taliban’s spiritual heartland, Kandahar. Obama vows the United States will not abandon Afghanistan, but he is sticking to a promise to begin withdrawing troops from July 2011.

IRAQ – Obama has declared the Iraq war will end for the United States by the end of 2011, when remaining U.S. troops will withdraw. Three months after a March 7 parliamentary election, Iraq still does not have a government, raising fears that the long delay could exacerbate sectarian tensions. But Washington says it is sticking to its withdrawal timetable.

(Compiled by Caren Bohan and Ross Colvin; editing by Cynthia Osterman)

IAEA report shows Iran’s nuclear defiance says U.S.

(Reuters) – The latest report by the U.N. nuclear watchdog underscores Iran’s refusal to comply with international requirements needed to allow constructive talks on its nuclear program, the White House said on Monday.

World

“This latest IAEA report clearly shows Iran’s continued failure to comply with its international obligations and its sustained lack of cooperation with the IAEA,” White House National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer said.

He was referring to a confidential report obtained by Reuters that said Iran has been preparing extra equipment for enriching uranium to higher levels.

President Barack Obama’s administration is leading a push for new U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran. The West accuses Iran of trying to develop nuclear weapons. Tehran says its purpose is strictly for civilian electricity generation.

Iran first started refining small batches of uranium to 20 percent purity in February, saying it wanted to produce fuel for a medical research reactor. This raised Western suspicion because that takes enrichment closer to the 90 percent purity needed to make atomic weapons.

The International Atomic Energy Agency report said Iran has added a second set of 164 centrifuges — nuclear enrichment machines — to help refine uranium to 20 percent purity.

“Most notably, the report outlines Iran’s continued uranium enrichment at both 3.5 percent and near 20 percent levels, construction of a heavy water research reactor, and refusal to permit the IAEA the access necessary to answer the ongoing questions regarding Qom and long outstanding questions that surround a possible military dimension to its nuclear program,” Hammer said.

“In sum, the IAEA’s latest report underscores that Iran has refused to take any of the steps required of it by the UNSC (U.N. Security Council) or IAEA Board of Governors, which are necessary to enable constructive negotiations on the future of its nuclear program,” he said.

(Reporting by Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Eric Beech)

US: IAEA report shows Iran’s nuclear defiance

May 31 (Reuters) – The latest report by the U.N. nuclear watchdog underscores Iran’s refusal to comply with international requirements needed to allow constructive talks on its nuclear program, the White House said on Monday.

“This latest IAEA report clearly shows Iran’s continued failure to comply with its international obligations and its sustained lack of cooperation with the IAEA,” White House National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer said.

He was referring to a confidential report obtained by Reuters that said Iran has been preparing extra equipment for enriching uranium to higher levels. Such a move could increase tensions with the West over its atomic work. President Barack Obama’s administration is leading a push for new U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran.

(Reporting by Matt Spetalnick, Editing by Sandra Maler)

Ahmadinejad urges Obama to accept nuke swap deal

Iran’s president Wednesday urged Barack Obama to accept a nuclear fuel swap deal, warning the US leader will miss a historic opportunity for improved cooperation from Tehran if the offer is rejected.

Mahmoud Ahamdinejad also issued a stern warning to Russia, saying Moscow’s support for the US-led push for a new round of UN sanctions against Iran was contrary to the two countries’ neighbourly and friendly relations.

Washington has denounced the Iranian offer, brokered last week by Brazil and Turkey, as a ploy by Tehran to avoid a new round of UN sanctions over its controversial nuclear program, which the West fears is geared toward nuclear weapons.

“There are people in the world who want to pit Mr Obama against the Iranian nation and bring him to the point of no return, where the path to his friendship with Iran will be blocked forever,” Ahmadinejad said during a rally in the southern town of Kerman.

Iran proposed last week to ship much of its low-enriched uranium to Turkey in return for nuclear fuel rods needed for a Tehran medical research reactor.

The fuel swap would diminish Iran’s stockpile of low-enriched uranium that can possibly be used in making atomic bombs, if the uranium is enriched to a higher, weapons-grade level.

Russian support for sanctions “not acceptable”-Iran

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Wednesday Russian support for new U.N. sanctions against Iran was unacceptable and called on President Dmitry Medvedev to rethink his support for Washington’s stance.

“We shouldn’t see, at sensitive times, our neighbour (Russia) supporting those who have been against us, have shown animosity to us for 30 years. This is not acceptable for the Iranian nation. I hope they will pay attention and take corrective action,” Ahmadinejad said in a televised speech in the south-eastern city of Kerman.

He also said a deal Iran made with Turkey and Brazil to ship some of its enriched uranium abroad was a “great opportunity” that U.S. President Barack Obama should seize. (Reporting by Robin Pomeroy; Editing by Charles Dick)

HIGHLIGHTS – UK PM Cameron speaks in parliament

British Prime Minister David Cameron gave a speech in parliament on Tuesday after the new government unveiled its legislative programme.

Following are key quotes.

BANKING REFORM:

“We are going to bring some law and order to the banking system that Labour allowed to wreck our economy. There will be more powers to the Bank of England in our financial services regulation bill and we’ll get to grips with the unacceptable bonus culture and open up credit lines for small businesses. We want to make sure our banks serve our economy rather than the other way round.”

IRAN:

“Even if Iran were to complete the deal proposed in their recent agreement with Turkey and Brazil, it would still retain around 50 percent of its stockpile of low enriched uranium, and it is this stockpile that could be enriched to weapons grade uranium.

“For the last six years we have pursued a twin-track policy offering engagement, but being prepared to apply pressure.

“I believe it is time to ratchet up that pressure, and the timetable is short.

“This government has a clear objective to ensure stronger U.N. and EU sanctions against Iran.”

(Reporting by Estelle Shirbon and Tim Castle)

As tensions rise, Israel launches air raid drill

Israel launched its biggest air raid exercise on Sunday to test its preparedness against possible missile strikes from Iranian-sponsored militant groups as international tensions rose over Tehran’s nuclear programme.

Israel has called for strong economic sanctions against Iran over its nuclear plans but, in a hint of possible military action, has said all options were on the table should diplomacy fail to resolve the dispute.

Israeli officials said the exercise, which will include sounding air raid sirens on Wednesday, would focus on municipal authorities’ responses to a scenario in which missiles were launched from the Gaza Strip, controlled by Hamas Islamists, and by Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon. Both are allies of Iran.

In public remarks at the start of the weekly cabinet meeting on Sunday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described Israel’s biggest civil defence exercise as a routine, protective move and said the government sought only “quiet, stability and peace”.

The air raid sirens will sound on Wednesday nationwide in a signal to Israelis to take cover in shelters or designated secure areas for 10 minutes, and much of the public is expected to take part in this drill.

In a test of an emergency warning system, the military’s Home Front Command will also send text messages that read — “Have a nice day” — to cellphone owners in certain areas of the country, the army said in a statement to test communications.

Rescue services will be put on a practice emergency footing, while a partial distribution of gas masks is also planned, in addition to air raid drills to be held at schools and hospitals.

FIVE-DAY DRILL

The five-day drill dubbed “Turning Point 4″ has sparked nervousness in the region as diplomatic efforts intensify to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions, which the West and Israel believe are aimed at building atomic weapons.

Iran denies its uranium enrichment programme is a quest for nuclear arms and says it is purely for power. Israel is widely believed to have the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal.

Itamar Rabinovitch, an expert on Middle East affairs and a former Israeli ambassador to Washington, said Israel must prepare for the possibility Iranian leaders would encourage Hamas and Hezbollah to fire on Israel in the event of stiffer U.N. sanctions against Iran.

“We must show we don’t intend to be sitting ducks in the event of such an attack,” Rabinovitch said.

Hezbollah fired more than 4,000 rockets into Israel during the 2006 Lebanon war. Hamas carried out numerous cross-border rocket attacks in the past, and Israel launched a war in the Gaza Strip in late 2008 with the aim of ending such strikes.

Israel has held a country-wide civil defence exercise annually for the past three years and military officials said the current drill is the most extensive in its 62-year history.

Hezbollah rockets did cause significant casualties during the Lebanon war, and Israeli officials have said that since the conflict ended, the group has bolstered its arsenal with more powerful and longer-range weapons.

Rockets fired from the Gaza Strip have rarely caused fatalities in Israel and carry a relatively small warhead. But Hamas has said it now has rockets that can reach deep into Israel.

China says welcomes Iran nuclear fuel swap deal

China has welcomed a nuclear fuel swap plan that Iran announced after talks with Brazil and Turkey, urging negotiations over the deepening dispute with Tehran.

Iran agreed with Brazil and Turkey on Monday to send some of its uranium abroad, reviving a fuel swap plan drafted by the United Nations with the aim of keeping its nuclear activities in check.

But Iran made clear it had no intention of suspending domestic enrichment the West suspects is aimed at making bombs.

Western powers have already said the offer will not be enough to ease their worries about Iran. But Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi suggested his government was encouraged by the proposal and favours negotiations.

“China expresses its welcome (of the fuel swap plan)”, Yang said late on Monday while visiting Tunisia, Xinhua news agency said.

“China has noted the relevant reports and expresses its welcome and appreciation for the diplomatic efforts made by the parties involved to seek an appropriate solution to the Iran nuclear issue.”

China is among the world powers that have been discussing possible new U.N. sanctions against Iran over its disputed nuclear activities. It is one of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, giving it the power to veto resolutions.

Yang’s published comments did not touch on whether China believes the nuclear fuel swap proposal means those sanctions discussions should be delayed. But he stressed that Beijing prefers a negotiated solution to the dispute.

China “believes that dialogue and negotiations should be the channels for resolving the Iran nuclear issue”, he said.

(Editing by Nick Macfie)

Russia warns U.S. against unilateral Iran sanctions

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned the United States and other Western nations on Thursday against imposing unilateral sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme, Interfax news agency reported.

The European Union has said it may impose unilateral sanctions if a U.N. Security Council resolution fails.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration has been lobbying Western companies not to do business with Iran, but has not imposed sanctions against them.

Countries facing Security Council sanctions “cannot under any circumstances be the subject of one-sided sanctions imposed by one or other government bypassing the Security Council”, Lavrov was quoted as saying by Interfax.

“The position of the United States today does not display understanding of this absolutely clear truth.”

Russia is in talks with the United States and other U.N. Security Council members on a fourth round of sanctions. Moscow has indicated it could support broader sanctions but has stressed they must not harm the Iranian people.

Washington has not publicly warned of unilateral sanctions but has made clear it wants tougher measures than veto-wielding Security Council member Russia is likely to accept.

Permanent Security Council member China has joined Russia in opposing Washington’s plans to impose tough, wide-ranging sanctions on the Islamic Republic over its refusal to suspend sensitive uranium enrichment activity and open up fully to U.N. nuclear inspections.

Lavrov’s warning came just before the arrival in Russia on Thursday of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil, a non-permament member of the Security Council that is also opposed to further sanctions against Iran.

Lula was expected to meet senior Russian officials on Friday to discuss how to revive a stalled nuclear fuel swap deal meant to minimise the risk of Tehran using enrichment for military purposes. Lula will travel on to Iran on Sunday.

Lavrov, speaking to deputies from Russia’s upper house of parliament, said the United States tended not to see international law as having pre-eminence over national laws.

“We are now confronted with this problem during discussion of a new U.N. Security Council resolution on Iran.”

Despite his criticism, Lavrov said that relations with the United States had shown clear signs of improvement, specifically with the signing of a nuclear-disarmament treaty that would reduce their deployed nuclear warheads by about 30 percent.

He said the document would soon be submitted to Russia’s parliament for ratification.

Israel sees no discord with U.S. on nuclear issue

Israel voiced confidence on Tuesday that U.S. President Barack Obama would not challenge its long-standing policy of neither confirming nor denying it has nuclear weapons.

Asked whether Israel was losing U.S. support for its policy of “nuclear ambiguity”, Defence Minister Ehud Barak told Israeli Army Radio: “I don’t believe so. I spoke at length with President Obama about such issues just 10 days ago.”

Barak met Obama and other U.S. officials in Washington against the backdrop of a U.N. review conference in New York of the parties to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, which Israel has not signed.

Hoping to win Arab backing for sanctions against Iran, the United States and other permanent U.N. Security Council members called last Wednesday for ways to be found to implement a 1995 initiative that would guarantee nuclear disarmament in a region where Israel is widely assumed to have the only such weapons.

The declaration followed campaigning by Egypt to focus attention, during the non-proliferation conference this month, on Israel, which has set peace with all its neighbours as a precondition for joining the pact.

Barak said Iran and North Korea — not Israel — were the main focus of international non-proliferation efforts.

“There’s nothing to be alarmed about. There is no real threat to the traditional position and understandings between Israel and the United States,” Barak said.

For the past 40 years, the United States has maintained a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy towards an assumed Israeli arsenal that is believed to include some 200 atomic warheads — a grievance and perceived threat among many Arabs and Muslims.

Israel’s strategy of ambiguity has been billed as a way to ward off enemies while avoiding public provocations that could trigger arms races.

Asked in the interview why Israel, which operates a top-secret reactor outside the southern town of Dimona, just doesn’t come out and acknowledge it is a nuclear power, Barak replied: “I think our position is the right one. There is no reason to change it.”

(Writing by Jeffrey Heller and Dan Williams; Editing by Charles Dick)