Sanofi to make formal Genzyme offer

(Reuters) – France’s Sanofi-Aventis (SASY.PA) plans to make a formal offer of up to $18.7 billion for Genzyme (GENZ.O) after its informal overture failed to strike interest, sources familiar with the situation said on Wednesday.

The board of Sanofi met in Paris on Wednesday and authorized management to make a formal offer of up to $70 per share for Genzyme, sources said.

Sanofi has bank commitments of funding that would allow it to raise that bid if needed, one source said. A second source cautioned that no formal proposal had been made yet and plans could still change.

Genzyme has a market capitalization of about $18 billion. At $70 per share, Sanofi would be offering a premium of roughly 30 percent over what the price of Genzyme’s stock was before news of takeover interest emerged.

The Wall Street Journal, citing people close to Genzyme, suggested that about $75 a share could be sufficient to win the support of Genzyme’s board.

Sanofi, which is scheduled to report second-quarter earnings on Thursday, declined to comment. Genzyme could not be immediately reached for comment.

Shares of Genzyme gained 5 percent to $71.20 in extended trading on Wednesday after news of the board meeting.

Analysts see Sanofi in greater need of a major acquisition than some of its rivals as it braces for generic competition for some of its key products.

Last week, Sanofi lowered its view for 2010 earnings per share after U.S. regulators approved a generic form of the Lovenox blood thinner, its No. 2 product last year.

Genzyme’s biggest-selling drug is Cerezyme, a treatment for Gaucher disease, a rare genetic disorder. Promising drugs in late stage development include a treatment for multiple sclerosis.

Orphan drugs — those that treat small numbers of patients but command high prices — are much less amenable to generic competition than pills and are therefore attractive acquisition candidates.

BEAR HUG LETTER EXPECTED

Sanofi’s proposal was expected to come in the form of a publicly disclosed “bear hug” letter that would lay out proposed takeover terms and try to pressure Genzyme to open negotiations, the first source said.

Genzyme failed to respond to Sanofi’s informal overture, sources previously told Reuters. Genzyme, which is trying to sell three non-core businesses, is not looking to sell the company, sources previously said.

Reports that Sanofi was making a run at Genzyme surfaced on Friday. The news has sent the U.S. company’s shares up about 30 percent since then as investors figured the company would garner a hefty premium for its portfolio of expensive treatments for rare genetic disorders and a pipeline of drugs in development.

Analysts see Genzyme fetching anywhere from $60 to $85 a share, depending on their view of the value of the company’s experimental drugs, the risks associated with its recovery from a manufacturing crisis and the entry of other bidders.

Some company watchers, however, focus on a narrower price range and say Genzyme shareholders may be willing to accept a price of $70 to $80 per share, particularly newer investors who were drawn to the company when it was targeted by activist investor Carl Icahn.

Sanofi’s approach comes on the heels of a turbulent two years for Genzyme and its chief executive, Henri Termeer, who is expected to step down within the next year or two.

Earlier this year, Termeer fought off a threatened proxy fight by reaching settlements with investors Carl Icahn, who now has two representatives on the company’s board, and Ralph Whitworth of Relational Investors LLC, who also sits on the board.

The Wall Street Journal said Britain’s Glaxo (GSK.L) had also recently made “a very casual approach” to Genzyme, but industry insiders and analysts said that Glaxo Chief Executive Andrew Witty, with a reputation for caution on M&A, was unlikely to chase Genzyme.

(Reporting by Jessica Hall; Editing by Gary Hill, Phil Berlowitz, Gary Hill)

Analysis: New BP boss should boost safety, asset sales

(Reuters) – Bob Dudley, who is expected to be named BP’s next CEO in the coming 24 hours, must move quickly to restore the oil giant’s battered image in its most important market, improve safety and make BP a leaner company.

BP’s board is meeting on Monday to discuss a plan for Tony Hayward to step down as Chief Executive following criticism of his handling of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, and be replaced by Dudley, who is heading the spill response effort.

Investors hope Dudley will help repair BP’s image in the U.S, which has been damaged by a clumsy public relations strategy and a series of gaffes by Hayward. “As an American he (Dudley) may well be more acceptable to the U.S. political machine than the other alternatives for the role, which could serve to better protect value in the U.S. for BP long term,” said Jason Kenney, oil analyst at ING in Edinburgh.

The U.S. is home to 40 percent of BP’s assets and much of its growth but the public and political anger over the oil spill has led to fears BP may no longer be able to operate effectively in the U.S.

Dudley benefits from experience of navigating fractious disputes, having led BP’s Russian joint venture, TNK-BP, through a dispute between BP and its oligarchs partners over control of the company.

He will also need to improve BP’s safety record to recover the respect of U.S. lawmakers.

This could require a change to BP’s buccaneering approach, where division managers have had greater freedom than their peers in other big oil companies and top management has been willing to take greater commercial risks.

“A total change in the culture of this company is necessary,” Democratic Representative Ed Markey, chairman of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, said on CBS’s “The Early Show.”

EXPENSIVE MISTAKES

In the past five years, BP has endured three of the industry’s most expensive and reputationally damaging safety and environmental lapses.

An explosion of a Texas refinery in 2005 killed 15 workers and cost the company billions, while an oil spill in Alaska in 2006 led to millions of dollars of fines and helped cement BP’s reputation in the U.S. as a reckless operator.

Regulators blamed both incidents on cost-cutting under Hayward’s predecessor John Browne.

Investors, once charmed by BP cost cutting, may now be more focused on a safer approach too from the group that pumped more oil and gas than any other non-state controlled oil concern last year.

“The company’s strategy will need to be fundamentally changed in order to rebuild future confidence in the company. Clearly, safety will need to become the centerpiece,” said Dougie Youngson, oil analyst at Arbuthnot.

Investors and analysts also predict strategic changes.

As part of a peace deal with the White House, which had been putting massive pressure on the oil giant, BP agreed to establish a $20 billion fund to compensate those affected by the spill.

It plans to sell $10 billion of none-core assets in the coming year to help finance that.

Last week the company said it had agreed the sale of $7 billion of assets and invited offers for another $1.7 billion worth of gas fields in Asia.

The company is likely to announce at its second-quarter results on Tuesday that it will increase it asset sales target, analysts at Morgan Stanley said.

The sales will hit BP’s plans to grow production, but investors and analysts said they will create a leaner, more profitable company.

“(We expect) significant asset sales and bizarrely that might prove to be the right business model for all oil majors,” said a top-15 shareholder, who asked not to be named.

“There is much greater value in the asset base of these businesses, whether it is BP or Shell, than in share prices. Actually they should think very hard at shrinking themselves down.”

However, some analysts doubt oil companies could recycle assets more quickly. The reason they are not quicker to sell off older fields, and replace them with new fields, is because they have such difficulty in making new discoveries.

BP has said its asset sale effort is focused on upstream, oil and gas production assets, but Arbuthnot’s Youngson said the oil major should also consider selling downstream assets.

“Refining is a relatively low contributor in terms of overall income and disposing of it would make a huge amount of sense, as well as generating a substantial cash injection for BP,” he said.

BP has sold refineries in recent years, but those it retains help it operate an aggressive oil trading operation that in a good year can generate over a $1 billion in profits.

(Additional reporting by Cecilia Valente in London and Eric Beech in Washington)

BP says no plans to issue statement on CEO

(Reuters) – BP said it had no plans to issue a statement about a board meeting on Monday which sources close to the company said discussed whether to confirm a plan to ditch Chief Executive Tony Hayward.

BP’s board was due to confirm a plan to replace Hayward with Bob Dudley, who is currently heading BP’s oil spill response, sources close to the company said.

BP is due to issue its second quarter results on Tuesday at 0600 GMT/2 a.m. EDT.

(Reporting by Tom Bergin, Editing by Sandra Maler)

BREAKINGVIEWS-Hayward’s exit would not bring BP catharthis

LONDON, July 25 (Reuters Breakingviews) – BP’s (BP.L) (BP.N) chief executive looks set to pay the appropriate price for mishandling the Gulf of Mexico disaster. But Tony Hayward’s impending departure should not be seen as providing redemption for the rest of the UK oil major’s board, let alone for its chairman, Carl-Henric Svanberg.

Whether through tiredness, bad luck or poor media experience, Hayward said the wrong thing on too many occasions after BP’s well blew out on April 20. One such slip, saying he “wanted his life back” just weeks after the fatal accident, has now become prophetic. Hayward became a global hate figure. It has for weeks been evident that his continuing presence at the helm of BP would obstruct the group’s rehabilitation in the United States, potentially saddling the shares with a discount. While going would be the right thing, it would have been better to say weeks ago that he would step down once the well was capped and when a successor could be found.

Some will see Hayward’s anticipated exit as evidence that Svanberg is belatedly showing strong leadership. But it is questionable whether the chairman’s own weakened authority can be restored. He should have publicly helped Hayward fight the fallout from the disaster sooner than he did. Worse, Svanberg allowed the board to dither over the dividend even when it was clear that continuing with the payout was both politically foolish and financially irresponsible. Ideally, Svanberg would have been the first to leave, with his successor finding a new CEO.

Hayward’s short tenure at the top — he has lasted less than four years — carries lessons for all bosses. The ability to handle a hostile media in a crisis is clearly as vital a skill in a boss as management or technical capability. A constructive relationship with a supportive and weighty chairman is also critical. And the episode has shown that new brooms cannot help but inherit some of the baggage of previous management. Hayward was vulnerable largely because of BP’s safety failings under his predecessor John Browne — even though he was appointed on a manifesto to fix them. It may now be for Bob Dudley, the U.S. BP executive tipped to succeed Hayward, to grapple with these challenges.

CONTEXT NEWS

– BP has decided chief executive Tony Hayward should step down over his handling of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and his departure could be announced in the coming days, Reuters reported on July 25. [ID:nN25157641]

– For previous columns by the author, Reuters customers can click on [HUGHES/]

(Editing by Hugo Dixon and David Evans)

Force Energy Corp.: Changes in Board of Directors and Officers

DENVER, COLORADO,, Jul 23 (MARKET WIRE) —
Force Energy Corp. (OTCBB: FORC)(FRANKFURT: FC2.F) (hereafter “Force”,
the “Company”), announces that Rahim Rayani resigned as president, chief
executive officer, chief financial officer and as a director of the
Company and that Tim DeHerrera has been appointed as president, chief
executive officer, chief financial officer and as a director to fill the
vacancies effective July 21, 2010.

Mr. DeHerrera has been president, chairman or on the board of directors
of several publicly traded and private entities during his career in
corporate finance. Most recently he was President of a public company and
he facilitated a successful merger of that company that closed in May
2010. Additionally, during the past several years he has been a
consultant to numerous companies in oil and gas exploration, technology
and credit card financing. Mr. DeHerrera has extensive experience in
investment banking, capital formation, capital restructures, private
placements, lender negotiations and overall business development.

There were no disagreements between Mr. Rayani, and the Company or the
Company’s board of directors on any matter relating to our company’s
operations, policies or practices. The Board of Directors would like to
take this opportunity to express their thanks to Mr. Rayani for his
advice and support during his time with the Company and wish him well as
he pursues new opportunities.

About Force Energy Corp.

Force Energy Corp. is an Oil & Gas Exploration and Development Company
based in Denver, CO with a focus on Wyoming. Using a geology-based
methodology, the US Geological Survey estimate a mean of 2.4 trillion
cubic feet of undiscovered natural gas and a mean of 41 million barrels
of undiscovered oil in the Wind River Basin Province of Wyoming. Force
Energy Corp. has acquired 75% working interest in the Diamond Springs
Prospect located within this prolific area. The Company’s shares are
publicly traded on the OTCBB under the ticker symbol FORC.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

FORCE ENERGY CORP.

Michael Mathot, Vice President Corporate Development

Contacts:
Force Energy Corp.
Michael Mathot
Vice President Corporate Development
1-877-436-8128
ir@forceenergycorp.com
www.forceenergycorp.com

Copyright 2010, Market Wire, All rights reserved.

Technip`s Second Quarter Results

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100721007037/en

2010 outlook confirmed
PARIS–(Business Wire)–
Regulatory News:

Technip (Paris:TEC) (ISIN:FR0000131708):

SECOND QUARTER 2010 RESULTS

* Revenue of €1,485 million, of which €688 million in Subsea
* Group operating margin of 10.8%
* Net Income of €106 million
* Net cash of €1,498 million
* Backlog of €8,263 million, underpinned by an order intake of €1,521 million

FULL YEAR 2010 OUTLOOK CONFIRMED*

* Group revenue around €5.9 – 6.1 billion
* Subsea revenue around €2.6 – 2.7 billion
* Subsea operating margin above 15%
* Onshore/Offshore combined operating margin stable year-on-year

* second quarter average exchange rates

€ million 2Q 09 2Q 10 % change ex. FX impact 1H 09 1H 10 % change ex. FX impact
(except EPS)
Revenue 1,732.0 1,484.5 (14.3)% (18.4)% 3,301.0 2,802.9 (15.1)% (17.5)%
EBITDA(1) 241.5 195.9 (18.9)% (24.7)% 432.2 370.4 (14.3)% (18.4)%
EBITDA Margin 13.9% 13.2% (75) bp 13.1% 13.2% 12 bp
Operating Income from recurring activities 196.0 160.5 (18.1)% (24.5)% 349.9 299.7 (14.3)% (18.8)%
Operating Margin 11.3% 10.8% (50) bp 10.6% 10.7% 9 bp
Operating Income 188.2 162.5 (13.7)% 347.3 301.7 (13.1)%
Net Income 116.2 106.1 (8.7)% 215.3 202.0 (6.2)%
EPS (€) 1.08 0.98 (9.5)% 2.01 1.87 (7.2)%
(1) Calculated as Operating Income from recurring activities pre depreciation and amortization

On July 20, 2010, Technip`s Board of Directors approved the unaudited second
quarter 2010 consolidated accounts. Chairman and CEO Thierry Pilenko commented:
“At the half of year, Technip remains on track to deliver its 2010 objectives,
following two quarters of good project execution and delivery across all
segments.

During the second quarter we made good progress on key projects in Subsea, and
despite lower activity in the North Sea and Asia, we accordingly delivered a
solid operating margin above our expectations at 16.9%. In Onshore/Offshore the
underlying profitability of our newer book of business combined with the
completion of key projects drove a satisfactory operating margin of 7.1%.

Order intake was €1,521 million split nearly 50:50 between Subsea and
Onshore/Offshore. In Subsea, major orders include Tupi pilot in Brazil and
Burullus in Egypt. In Onshore/Offshore, we took a significant reimbursable EPCIC
order in Asia, a project for Eastern Europe and various other projects.

Our expectations for an improvement in the North Sea have been confirmed by a
pick up in awards in the quarter notably on the Norwegian side: we expect this
to continue in the second half. Brazil continues to show promise and prospects
in the Middle East and Asia are substantial although competition remains intense
particularly Onshore.

It is difficult to predict all of the repercussions from the tragic incident in
the Gulf of Mexico. At this stage, there has been no adverse impact on our 2010
operations. The drilling moratorium will likely delay near-term FIDs for Subsea
and Offshore order intake in the Gulf even if FEEDs and studies continue to be
awarded. In the longer term we believe operators will everywhere prefer to work
with contractors that have been investing consistently in safety,
high-performing assets, operational excellence, and technology – elements that
are central to Technip`s strategy.

For the balance of the year, we will continue to focus on the key drivers of our
business: good project execution (notably for our Subsea projects in
installation phase), and a balanced, profitable order intake. Furthermore
Technip will continue to invest in its strategy, with a particular focus on
local content and partnerships, technology and hiring key talent throughout our
business.”

I. SECOND QUARTER 2010 REPORT

1. Operational Highlights

Subsea business segment`s main events were:

* In the Gulf of Mexico:

* Cascade & Chinook project was successfully completed,
* Offshore operations on other projects continued as planned,

* Pipelayer Apache II sea trials were completed in May. She successfully
completed her first projects: Talisman Auk North and Burghley in the North Sea,
* Vessel utilization rate was 70% compared with 83% a year ago and 70% in the
first quarter 2010,
* Offshore operations continued on Jubilee field in Ghana,
* Procurement and fabrication progressed well in preparation for offshore
operations on Pazflor and Block 31 projects in Angola,
* Operations offshore Brazil on the Tupi gas export pipeline continued,
* Good activity at flexible pipe production units continued.

Offshore business segment`s main events were:

* FEED activities continued to progress as planned for Floating LNG contracts
for Shell Prelude field near Australia and for Petrobras in Brazil,
* FEED activities progressed on Wheatstone gas processing platform for offshore
Australia,
* Projects in Brazil and Asia progressed well.

In the Onshore business segment:

* Construction and pre-commissioning continued to progress for Qatargas 3&4
Trains 6 and 7 in Qatar,
* Dung Quat refinery in Vietnam was turned over to the Client,
* Saudi Arabian Khursaniyah gas plant, Trains 1 & 2 were turned over to the
client,
* Second train of the Yemen LNG natural gas liquefaction plant turned over to
the client,
* Construction activities and pre-commissioning progressed well, and
commissioning started on the Gdańsk refinery for Grupa Lotos in Poland,
* Engineering and procurement continued for the Jubail refinery in Saudi Arabia;
early construction works started,
* Biodiesel plants for Neste Oil progressed well with construction in Rotterdam,
The Netherlands, while commissioning started in Singapore,
* Basic engineering was completed while detailed engineering and procurement
progressed as planned on the Yinchuan, Ningxia LNG in China.

2. Order intake and Backlog

During second quarter 2010, Technip`s order intake was €1,521 million compared
with €873 million in second quarter 2009. The breakdown by business segment for
the second quarter was as follows:

€ million 2Q 09 2Q 10
Subsea 528.7 60.6% 772.8 50.8%
Offshore 119.9 13.7% 318.6 20.9%
Onshore 224.3 25.7% 429.9 28.3%

Subsea order intake of €773 million comprised notably of a wide variety of
projects in the North Sea including Devenick for BP, the Marulk reeled
pipe-in-pipe project for Eni and several frame agreements (BP, BG, and Statoil).
We won several contracts in Brazil including Tupi 2Pilot, and in Egypt, where we
were awarded the West Delta Deep Marine (WDDM) Phase VIIIa project for Burullus.

Onshore/Offshore order intake included a significant reimbursable EPCIC project
in Asia, as well as an extension of the Artificial Island FEED in UAE for ZADCO
and several small and medium-sized projects in Europe and Latin America.

Listed in annex II (d) are the main contracts announced during second quarter
2010 and their approximate value if publicly disclosed.

At the end of second quarter 2010, Technip`s backlog rose to €8,263 million,
compared with €8,018 million at the end of fourth quarter 2009 and €6,066
million at the end of second quarter 2009. Approximately 35% of the backlog is
expected to be executed in the second half of 2010.

The backlog breakdown by business segment is as follows:

€ million June 30, 2009 June 30, 2010
Subsea 3,115.9 51.4% 3,057.3 37.0%
Offshore 373.9 6.2% 600.8 7.3%
Onshore 2,575.9 42.4% 4,604.7 55.7%

3. Capital expenditures

Capital expenditure for second quarter 2010 was inline with expectations at €90
million compared with €175 million a year ago (which included the Apache II
acquisition).

4. Other

The ongoing investigations led by the US Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) have been resolved by the signature
on June 28th, 2010 of a final agreement to fully resolve all potential claims
arising from Technip`s participation in the TSKJ joint venture between 1994 and
2004. The agreements are in line with the disclosures made previously. Technip
agreed to pay USD 240 million to the DOJ in eight equal installments over the
next two years starting in the third quarter and to the SEC USD 98 million in
July 2010.

II. SECOND QUARTER 2010 FINANCIAL RESULTS

1.Revenue

€ million 2Q 09 2Q 10 % change
Subsea 848.4 687.6 (19.0)%
Offshore 147.6 185.5 25.7%
Onshore 736.0 611.4 (16.9)%
Corporate – – nm
Total 1,732.0 1,484.5 (14.3)%

* Subsea`s major revenue contributors included Jubilee in Ghana, Caesar Tonga
and Cascade & Chinook in the Gulf of Mexico, Pazflor and Block 31 in Angola, and
various contracts in the North Sea and Brazil, for example the Tupi gas export
pipeline,
* Offshore`srevenue included the Floating LNG contracts for Shell and Petrobras,
the Wheatstone gas processing platform FEED in Australia, and numerous ongoing
contracts in Asia,
* Onshore`s major revenue contributors were the Jubail refinery and Khursaniyah
gas plant in Saudi Arabia, the Ningxia LNG in China and the Dung Quat Refinery
in Vietnam.

Foreign exchange had a positive impact of €71 million on second quarter 2010
Group revenue compared with same quarter last year.

2.Operating Income from Recurring Activities

€ million 2Q 09 2Q 10 % change
Subsea 159.1 116.1 (27.0)%
Offshore 8.8 9.0 2.3%
Onshore 38.3 47.5 24.0%
Corporate (10.2) (12.1) 18.6%
Total 196.0 160.5 (18.1)%

Subsea EBITDA margin was 21.1% versus 23.5% for the same quarter last year and
operating margin was 16.9% versus 18.8% for the same quarter last year.

The successful completion of several projects drove the combined operating
margin for Onshore/Offshore to 7.1% compared with 5.3% a year ago.

Foreign exchange had a positive impact of €13 million on second quarter 2010
Group operating income from recurring activities compared with same quarter last
year.

Financial income on projects accounted as revenue amounted to €4 million during
second quarter 2010 compared with €6 million in second quarter 2009.

3.Net Income

€ million 2Q 09 2Q 10 % change
Other operating income (7.8) 2.0 nm
Operating Income 188.2 162.5 (13.7)%
Financial charges (22.7) (8.1) (64.3)%
Income from equity affiliates 0.7 (1.0) nm
Income tax (50.1) (48.2) (3.8)%
Minority Interests 0.1 0.9 nm
Net income 116.2 106.1 (8.7)%

Financialcharges for second quarter 2010 included a €7 million negative impact
from currency variations and fair market value of hedging instruments, compared
with a €16 million negative impact for the same quarter in 2009.

The effective tax rate in the quarter was 31.4% compared with 30.1% a year ago.

The average number of shares during the period on a diluted basis is calculated
as per IFRS. For second quarter 2010 the number of shares stood at 108,076,795
versus 107,157,468 for the same quarter in 2009. The variation is mainly due to
the diluted effect of the outstanding performance shares and stock options
granted by the Board of Directors to Technip`s employees.

4.Cash and Balance Sheet

€ million
Net cash as of March 31, 2010 1,800.6
Net cash from operating activities (162.5)
of which:
Cash from operations 126.3
Change in Working capital (288.8)
Capex (89.5)
Dividend payment (143.6)
Others including currency 92.9
Net cash as of June 30, 2010 1,497.9

As of June 30, 2010, the Group`s net cash position was €1,498 million compared
with €1,784 million as of December 31, 2009 and €1,561 million as of June 30,
2009.

During second quarter 2010, cash generated from operations amounted to €126
million compared with €160 million for the same quarter in 2009. Working capital
movements had a €289 million negative impact.

Shareholders` equity as of June 30, 2010 was €2,722 million compared with €2,717
million as of December 31, 2009.

III. FULL YEAR 2010 OUTLOOK

Full year 2010 outlook remains unchanged*:

* Group revenue around €5.9 – 6.1 billion
* Subsea revenue around €2.6 – 2.7 billion
* Subsea operating margin above 15%
* Onshore/Offshore combined operating margin stable year-on-year

* second quarter average exchange rates

°

° °

The information package on Second Quarter 2010 results includes this press release and the annexes which follow as well as the presentation published on Technip`s website: www.technip.com

NOTICE

Today, July 22nd, 2010, Chairman and CEO Thierry Pilenko, along with CFO Julian
Waldron, will comment on Technip`s results and answer questions from the
financial community during a conference call in English starting at 10:00 a.m.
CET.

To participate in the conference call, you may call any of the following
telephone numbers approximately 5 – 10 minutes prior to the scheduled start
time:

France / Continental Europe: + 33 (0)1 72 00 09 84

UK: + 44 (0) 203 367 9454

USA: + 1 866 907 5924

The conference call will also be available via a simultaneous, listen-only
audio-cast on Technip`s website.

A replay of this conference call will be available approximately two hours
following the conference call for 90 days on the Technip`s website and for two
weeks at the following telephone numbers:

Telephone Numbers Confirmation Code

France / Continental Europe: + 33 (0)1 72 00 15 00 270307#

UK: + 44 (0)203 367 9460 270307#

USA: + 1 877 642 3018 270307#

Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements

This presentation contains both historical and forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather reflect
our current expectations concerning future results and events and generally may
be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believe”, “aim”,
“expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “foresee”, “likely”, “should”, “planned”,
“may”, “estimates”, “potential” or other similar words. Similarly, statements
that describe our objectives, plans or goals are or may be forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance
or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Risks
that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results
anticipated in the forward-looking statements include, among other things: our
ability to successfully continue to originate and execute large services
contracts, and construction and project risks generally; the level of
production-related capital expenditure in the oil and gas industry as well as
other industries; currency fluctuations; interest rate fluctuations; raw
material (especially steel) as well as maritime freight price fluctuations; the
timing of development of energy resources; armed conflict or political
instability in the Arabian-Persian Gulf, Africa or other regions; the strength
of competition; control of costs and expenses; the reduced availability of
government-sponsored export financing; losses in one or more of our large
contracts; U.S. legislation relating to investments in Iran or elsewhere where
we seek to do business; changes in tax legislation, rules, regulation or
enforcement; intensified price pressure by our competitors; severe weather
conditions; our ability to successfully keep pace with technology changes; our
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the evolution, interpretation
and uniform application and enforcement of International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS), according to which we prepare our financial statements as of
January 1, 2005; political and social stability in developing countries;
competition; supply chain bottlenecks; the ability of our subcontractors to
attract skilled labor; the fact that our operations may cause the discharge of
hazardous substances, leading to significant environmental remediation costs;
our ability to manage and mitigate logistical challenges due to underdeveloped
infrastructure in some countries where we are performing projects.

Some of these risk factors are set forth and discussed in more detail in our
Annual Report. Should one of these known or unknown risks materialize, or should
our underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our future results could be
adversely affected, causing these results to differ materially from those
expressed in our forward-looking statements. These factors are not necessarily
all of the important factors that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other
unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material adverse effects on our
future results. The forward-looking statements included in this release are made
only as of the date of this release.We cannot assure you that projected results
or events will be achieved. We do not intend, and do not assume any obligation
to update any industry information or forward-looking information set forth in
this release to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

****

This presentation does not constitute an offer or invitation to purchase any
securities of Technip in the United States or any other jurisdiction. Securities
may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an
exemption from registration. The information contained in this presentation may
not be relied upon in deciding whether or not to acquire Technip securities.

This presentation is being furnished to you solely for your information, and it
may not be reproduced, redistributed or published, directly or indirectly, in
whole or in part, to any other person. Non-compliance with these restrictions
may result in the violation of legal restrictions of the United States or of
other jurisdictions.

Technip is a world leader in the fields of project management, engineering and
construction for the oil & gas industry, offering a comprehensive portfolio of
innovative solutions and technologies.

With 23,000 employees around the world, integrated capabilities and proven
expertise in underwater infrastructures (Subsea), offshore facilities (Offshore)
and large processing units and plants on land (Onshore), Technip is a key
contributor to the development of sustainable solutions for the energy
challenges of the 21st century.

Present in 48 countries, Technip has operating centers and industrial assets
(manufacturing plants, spoolbases, construction yard) on five continents, and
operates its own fleet of specialized vessels for pipeline installation and
subsea construction.

The Technip share is listed on NYSE Euronext Paris exchange and over the counter
(OTC) in the USA.

OTC ADR ISIN: US8785462099

°

° °

ANNEX I (a)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

IFRS, unaudited

€ million Second Quarter First Half
(except EPS, and number of shares)
2009 2010 % ∆ 2009 2010 % ∆
Revenue 1,732.0 1,484.5 (14.3 )% 3,301.0 2,802.9 (15.1 )%
Gross Margin 299.9 288.4 (3.8 )% 562.3 542.1 (3.6 )%
Research & Development Expenses (14.0 ) (13.3 ) (5.0 )% (25.6 ) (26.2 ) 2.3 %
SG&A & Other Operating Expenses (89.9 ) (114.6 ) 27.5 % (186.8 ) (216.2 ) 15.7 %
Operating Income from Recurring activities 196.0 160.5 (18.1 )% 349.9 299.7 (14.3 )%
Other operating income (7.8 ) 2.0 nm (2.6 ) 2.0 nm
Operating Income 188.2 162.5 (13.7 )% 347.3 301.7 (13.1 )%
Financial Income (Charges) (22.7 ) (8.1 ) (64.3 )% (34.8 ) (11.3 ) (67.5 )%
Income from Equity Affiliates 0.7 (1.0 ) nm 1.4 – nm
Profit Before Tax 166.2 153.4 (7.7 )% 313.9 290.4 (7.5 )%
Income Tax (50.1 ) (48.2 ) (3.8 )% (94.5 ) (90.0 ) (4.8 )%
Tax on Sale of Activities – – – –
Minority Interests 0.1 0.9 nm (4.1 ) 1.6 nm
Net Income 116.2 106.1 (8.7 )% 215.3 202.0 (6.2 )%

Number of Shares on a Diluted Basis 107,157,468 108,076,795 106,886,791 108,007,347

EPS (€) on a Diluted Basis 1.08 0.98 (9.5 )% 2.01 1.87 (7.2 )%

1 As per IFRS, Earnings Per Share (diluted) is calculated by dividing profit or
loss attributable to the Parent Company`s Shareholders by the weighted average
number of outstanding shares during the period, plus the effect of dilutive
stock options and performance shares calculated according to the “Share Purchase
Method” (IFRS 2), less treasury shares. In conformity with this method,
anti-dilutive stock options are ignored in calculating EPS. Dilutive options are
taken into account if the subscription price of the stock options plus the
future IFRS 2 charge (i.e. the sum of annual charge to be recorded until the end
of the stock option plan) is lower than the average market share price during
the period.

ANNEX I (b)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET IFRS

€ million Dec. 31, 2009 June 30, 2010
(audited) (unaudited)

Fixed Assets 3,646.0 3,812.4
Deferred Taxes 263.8 383.8
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 3,909.8 4,196.2

Construction Contracts 158.0 248.2
Inventories, Trade Receivables and Others 1,845.9 1,913.5
Cash & Cash Equivalents 2,656.3 2,404.1
CURRENT ASSETS 4,660.2 4,565.8

TOTAL ASSETS 8,570.0 8,762.0

Shareholders` Equity (Parent Company) 2,686.7 2,695.3
Minority Interests 30.4 26.9
SHAREHOLDERS` EQUITY 2,717.1 2,722.2

Non-Current Debts 844.5 244.2
Non-Current Provisions 100.4 113.2
Deferred Taxes and Other Non-Current Liabilities 124.9 122.1
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,069.8 479.5

Current Debts 28.2 662.0
Current Provisions 484.1 262.5
Construction Contracts 975.6 706.5
Accounts Payable & Other Advances Received 3,295.2 3,929.3
CURRENT LIABILITIES 4,783.1 5,560.3

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS` EQUITY & LIABILITIES 8,570.0 8,762.0

Changes in Shareholders` Equity (Parent Company), unaudited
Shareholders` Equity as of December 31, 2009 2,686.7
First Half 2010 Net Income 202.0
Capital Increases 2.6
IAS 32 and 39 Impacts (174.3 )
Dividend Payment (143.6 )
Treasury Shares 0.8
Translation Adjustments and Other 121.1
Shareholders` Equity as of June 30, 2010 2,695.3

ANNEX I (c)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

IFRS, unaudited

First Half
€ million 2009 2010

Net Income 215.3 202.0
Depreciation of Fixed Assets 82.2 70.8
Stock Option and Performance Share Charges 13.8 5.7
Long-Term Provisions (including Employee Benefits) 3.0 2.0
Carry Forwards not previously Recognized – –
Deferred Income Tax (11.8) (40.7)
Capital (Gain) Loss on Asset Sale (0.7) (9.8)
Minority Interests and Other 5.5 (1.6)
Cash from Operations 307.3 228.4

Change in Working Capital (44.4) (366.5)

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities 262.9 (138.1)

Capital Expenditures (232.9) (150.8)
Cash Proceeds from Asset Sales 1.2 21.6
Acquisitions of Investments, net of cash acquired (7.4) (28.9)
Change of scope of consolidation – 2.4

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investment Activities (239.1) (155.7)

Increase (Decrease) in Debt 46.2 9.9
Capital Increase 0.0 2.6
Dividend Payment (127.5) (143.6)
Treasury Shares – (6.8)

Net Cash Provided by (used in) Financing Activities (81.3) (137.9)

Foreign Exchange Translation Adjustment 36.2 180.3

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents (21.3) (251.4)

Bank overdraft at Period Beginning (4.2) (1.2)
Cash and Equivalents at Period Beginning 2,404.7 2,656.3
Bank overdraft at Period End (0.1) (0.4)
Cash and Equivalents at Period End 2,379.2 2,404.1
(21.3) (251.4)

ANNEX I (d)

TREASURY AND FINANCIAL DEBT – CURRENCY RATES

IFRS

€ million Treasury and Financial Debt
Dec. 31, 2009 June 30, 2010
(audited) (unaudited)
Cash Equivalents 2,140.6 1,674.5
Cash 515.7 729.6
Cash & Cash Equivalents (A) 2,656.3 2,404.1
Current Debts 28.2 662.0
Non Current Debts 844.5 244.2
Gross Debt (B) 872.7 906.2
Net Financial Cash (Debt) (A – B) 1,783.6 1,497.9

€ versus Foreign Currency Conversion Rates

Statement of Income Balance Sheet as of
2Q 09 2Q 10 1H 09 1H 10 Dec. 31, 2009 June 30, 2010

USD 1.36 1.27 1.33 1.35 1.44 1.23
GBP 0.88 0.85 0.89 0.88 0.89 0.85

ANNEX II (a)

REVENUE BY REGION

IFRS, unaudited

Second Quarter First Half
€ million 2009 2010 % Δ 2009 2010 % Δ
Europe, Russia, C. Asia 492.1 430.1 (12.6)% 867.4 696.1 (19.7)%
Africa 279.3 218.9 (21.6)% 458.7 510.3 11.2%
Middle East 325.8 304.5 (6.5)% 738.5 586.4 (20.6)%
Asia Pacific 199.3 184.5 (7.4)% 407.7 350.8 (14.0)%
Americas 435.5 346.5 (20.4)% 828.7 659.3 (20.4)%
TOTAL 1,732.0 1,484.5 (14.3)% 3,301.0 2,802.9 (15.1)%

ANNEX II (b)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY BUSINESS SEGMENT

IFRS, unaudited

€ million 2Q 09 2Q 10 % ∆ 1H 09 1H 10 % ∆
SUBSEA
Revenue 848.4 687.6 (19.0 )% 1,464.0 1,319.4 (9.9 )%
Gross Margin 196.5 168.2 (14.4 )% 360.4 323.3 (10.3 )%
Operating Income from Recurring Activities 159.1 116.1 (27.0 )% 277.5 224.3 (19.2 )%

Depreciation and Amortization (40.1 ) (29.2 ) (27.2 )% (69.6 ) (58.5 ) (15.9 )%
EBITDA(1) 199.2 145.3 (27.1 )% 347.1 282.8 (18.5 )%

OFFSHORE
Revenue 147.6 185.5 25.7 % 294.7 327.5 11.1 %
Gross Margin 24.4 26.0 6.6 % 44.7 50.6 13.2 %
Operating Income from Recurring Activities 8.8 9.0 2.3 % 15.4 20.0 29.9 %

Depreciation and Amortization (2.5 ) (2.7 ) 8.0 % (4.9 ) (4.9 ) 0.0 %

ONSHORE
Revenue 736.0 611.4 (16.9 )% 1,542.3 1,156.0 (25.0 )%
Gross Margin 79.0 94.5 19.6 % 157.2 168.5 7.2 %
Operating Income from Recurring Activities 38.3 47.5 24.0 % 74.7 75.1 0.5 %

Depreciation and Amortization (3.1 ) (2.7 ) (12.9 )% (7.1 ) (6.5 ) (8.5 )%

CORPORATE
Operating Income from Recurring Activities (10.2 ) (12.1 ) 18.6 % (17.7 ) (19.7 ) 11.3 %

Depreciation and Amortization 0.2 (0.8 ) nm (0.7 ) (0.8 ) 14.3 %

(1) Calculated as Operating Income from recurring activities before depreciation
and amortization

ANNEX II (c)

ORDER INTAKE & BACKLOG

unaudited

Order Intake by Business Segment
Second Quarter
€ million 2009 2010 % Δ
Subsea 528.7 772.8 46.2%
Offshore 119.9 318.6 2.7x
Onshore 224.3 429.9 1.9x
TOTAL 872.9 1,521.3 74.3%

Backlog by Business Segment
€ million As of As of As of
June 30, 2009 Dec. 31, 2009 June 30, 2010
Subsea 3,115.9 3,053.0 3,057.3
Offshore 373.9 467.9 600.8
Onshore 2,575.9 4,497.4 4,604.7
TOTAL 6,065.7 8,018.3 8,262.8

Backlog by Region
€ million As of As of As of
June 30, 2009 Dec. 31, 2009 June 30, 2010
Europe, Russia, C. Asia 1,152.7 1,440.2 1,716.0
Africa 1,583.5 1,505.6 1,341.5
Middle East 1,182.2 3,062.7 3,066.3
Asia Pacific 618.8 643.3 660.5
Americas 1,528.5 1,366.5 1,478.5
TOTAL 6,065.7 8,018.3 8,262.8

June 30, 2010 Backlog Estimated Scheduling

SUBSEA OFFSHORE ONSHORE GROUP
€ million
For 2010 (6 months) 1,264.1 367.9 1,263.5 2,895.5
For 2011 1,439.1 195.2 2,265.3 3,899.6
For 2012 and beyond 354.1 37.7 1,075.9 1,467.7
TOTAL 3,057.3 600.8 4,604.7 8,262.8

ANNEX II (d)

ORDER INTAKE

unaudited

In Second quarter 2010, Technip`s order intake reached €1,521 million compared with €873 million for the same period the year before. The main contracts that we announced during second quarter 2010 were:
* Onshore was awarded two contracts, together worth approximately €115 million, by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) for their diesel hydrotreater project in the Visakh refinery, on the east coast of India,
* Onshore was awarded three lump sum turnkey contracts for Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd. (MRPL), worth a total value of approximately €25 million, for the Phase III Expansion Project for a refinery located in Mangalore on the west coast of India,
* Subsea was awarded by Statoil ASA a three-year framework contract for the design, fabrication and supply of flexible pipe products for projects in Norway,
* Subsea was awarded a contract by Petrobras for the Tupi pilot infield lines. This field is located at a water depth of 2,200 meters in the pre-salt layer of the Santos Basin, approximately 300 kilometers offshore the Brazilian coast,
* Subsea was awarded a contract worth approximately €30 million by Statoil ASA for the fabrication and installation of a 30.5 kilometer-long pipe-in-pipe flowline to support the Marulk field development in the Norwegian sea,
* Subsea was awarded an engineering, procurement, installation and construction (EPIC) contract by Eni for the Kitan field development project, located in approximately 350 meters of water in the Timor Sea, 500 kilometers off the Australian coast,
* Subsea was awarded a major four-year term agreement by BG Group for the provision of pre-FEED, FEED, full EPIC and IRM services in both the United Kingdom and Norwegian Continental Shelves. The agreement contains a provision to extend the contract with a further three, one-year options,
* Subsea was awarded a lump sum engineering, procurement, installation and construction (EPIC) contract by Burullus Gas Company SAE for the West Delta Marine (WDDM) Phase VIIIa development project. The contract value is in excess of USD300 million. It involves an expansion of the WDDM facilities, located 95 kilometers offshore Egypt in the Mediterranean Sea.

Since July 1, 2010, Technip has also announced the award of the following contracts that were included in the backlog as of June 30, 2010:
* Subsea was awarded by BP two significant contracts, with a combined total value in the region of GBP100 million. The first award is a three-year diving repair & maintenance (R&M) frame agreement contract with two further one year options. The second is a major engineering and installation contract for the development of the Devenick field, located 234 kilometers north east of Aberdeen,
* Subsea was awarded by BP Exploration Operating Company Ltd a contract, worth approximately €14 million, for the Andrew field development. This field is located 230 kilometers north east of Aberdeen, in the United Kingdom North Sea.

Since July 1, 2010, Technip has also announced the award of the following
contracts that were included in the backlog as of June 30, 2010:

* Subsea was awarded by BP two significant contracts, with a combined total
value in the region of GBP100 million. The first award is a three-year diving
repair & maintenance (R&M) frame agreement contract with two further one year
options. The second is a major engineering and installation contract for the
development of the Devenick field, located 234 kilometers north east of
Aberdeen,

* Subsea was awarded by BP Exploration Operating Company Ltd a contract, worth
approximately €14 million, for the Andrew field development. This field is
located 230 kilometers north east of Aberdeen, in the United Kingdom North Sea.

Technip
Investor and Analyst Relations
Kimberly Stewart, +33 (0) 1 47 78 66 74
kstewart@technip.com
or
Public Relations
Christophe Bélorgeot, +33 (0) 1 47 78 39 92
Floriane Lassalle-Massip, +33 (0) 1 47 78 32 79
press@technip.com
Technip`s website: http://www.technip.com
Technip`s IR website: http://investors-en.technip.com
Technip`s IR mobile website: http://investors.mobi-en.technip.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

Omidyar Network Commits $2.1 M to the Foundation for Ecological Security to Secure Rights to Common Land for India’s Poor

REDWOOD CITY, Calif., and MUMBAI, India, July 15

REDWOOD CITY, Calif., and MUMBAI, India, July 15 /PRNewswire/ — Omidyar Network announced today a grant of $2.1 million over two years to the Foundation for Ecological Security (FES) to extend property rights to common land to India’s poorest communities. FES will use the funding to advance policy advocacy, grow operations, and offer new programs that will enable 1.5 million people to obtain property rights to community land while also restoring natural resources in these areas.

FES is the largest organization focused on giving India’s rural poor rights to common land (“the commons”). While up to 30 percent of India’s population depends on the commons for their livelihood, very few have formal rights to this land. FES addresses this issue by representing landless communities and organizing long-term leasing arrangements and secure tenure with state governments. FES uses a holistic approach to resource management that includes securing legal rights and financial resources for individuals, strengthening village institutions, and improving the productivity and long-term sustainability of natural resources.

“For more than 300 million of India’s rural poor, the commons act as a critical safety net — contributing income, water, and everyday nutrition when they are needed most,” said Dr. Amrita Patel, Chair of FES’s Board of Governors. “With Omidyar Network’s funding, FES will reach thousands of additional rural communities with programs that enable them to access, share and conserve their common lands.”

Omidyar Network works to bring greater awareness to the fundamental role of property rights in poverty alleviation globally. In India, where Omidyar Network has opened an office and invested more than $50 million to date, the organization works to increase economic opportunity through a range of tools, including access to land rights. Helping FES scale its operations will enable it to expand critical programs, as well as advocate for policies that encourage equal rights for poor communities.

“Property rights are fundamental to bringing greater economic opportunity, long-term financial security, and personal dignity to the poor,” said Jayant Sinha, Managing Director, Omidyar Network India Advisors. “We are proud to support FES’s goal to materially improve the lives of millions and believe their work demonstrates the potential of property rights to unleash economic growth for lasting impact.”

“Omidyar Network’s support marks a major milestone in FES’s history,” said Jagdeesh Rao Puppala, Executive Director of FES. “Omidyar Network brings a complementary set of values and commitment to property rights, while the funding is timely in helping us reach India’s growing population and addressing the degradation and depletion of natural resources, especially in rural areas.”

About Omidyar Network

Omidyar Network is a philanthropic investment firm dedicated to harnessing the power of markets to create opportunity for people to improve their lives. Established in 2004 by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar and his wife Pam, the organization invests in and helps scale innovative organizations to catalyze economic and social change. To date, Omidyar Network has committed more than $350 million to for-profit companies and nonprofit organizations that foster economic advancement and encourage individual participation across multiple investment areas, including microfinance, property rights, government transparency, and social media. To learn more about Omidyar Network, please visit www.omidyar.com.

About FES

Registered under the Societies Registration Act XXI 1860, the Foundation for Ecological Security was set up in 2001 to improve the governance of natural resources in India. FES works with 1,526 village institutions in 27 districts across six states, assisting village communities in protecting 107,094 hectares of revenue wastelands, degraded forestlands and Panchayat grazing lands. FES support Panchayats and their subcommittees, Village Forest Committees, Gramya Jungle Committees, Water Users Associations and Watershed Committees. Regardless of the form of the institution, FES strives for a future where local communities determine and move towards desirable land-use that is based on principles of conservation and social justice. For more information, visit http://fes.org.in.

SOURCE Omidyar Network

Scana Industrier asa: SCI: Agreement regarding a directed issue of 9.9% of the shares in TTS Group

Reference is made to the press-release sent 5 July 2010 and today regarding RS Platou
Markets AS’ order to purchase up to 10% of the shares in TTS Group ASA.

TTS Group has entered into an agreement with Scana Industrier ASA to issue 6,722,920
shares in TTS Group ASA at a price of NOK 6.30 per share, constituting 9.9% of the share
capital in TTS Group through a private placement of shares.

RS Platou Markets AS acted as sole advisor in the transaction.

As a consequence of the purchase, Scana Industrier ASA will own 9.9% of the share
capital in TTS Group.

The issuance of shares to Scana Industrier ASA will be made by TTS Group’s board
pursuant to authorization granted by the company’s general meeting held on 3 June 2010
and is expected to be completed within the end of this week.

For further information, please contact:

Christian Rugland, CFO Scana Industrier ASA, tel. +47 952 952 55 (cru@scana.no)

Rolf Roverud, CEO Scana Industrier ASA, tel. +47 911 67 581 (rro@scana.no)

Frode Alhaug, Chairman Scana Industrier ASA, tel. +47 906 44 875

Johannes D. Neteland, President & CEO TTS Group ASA, tel. +47 918 46 906

This information is subject of the disclosure requirements acc. to §5-12 vphl (Norwegian
Securities Trading Act)

AIG CEO and Chairman at odds over failed AIA deal: report

AIG is weighing its options for its Asian life insurance unit after a $35.5 billion deal to sell the business to Prudential fell apart.

Benmosche had supported Prudential PLC (PRU.L) deal and argued for accepting a reduction of about $5 billion to help the British company win support from its shareholders, the people told the paper.

However, AIG’s board led by Golub rejected the idea by an overwhelming margin, forcing AIG to go back to its original plan for a public listing of AIA, the FT said.

The divestment of AIA, which could include an IPO, is seen as a key step in AIG’s efforts to repay the government for its $182.3 billion bailout.

The rift between AIG’s two top executives has triggered concerns within the board and among officials in the U.S. government, who fear one of the two men might leave less than a year after their appointment, the paper said.

However, the relationship between Benmosche and Golub has not yet completely broken down, the people told the paper.

AIG could not immediately be reached by Reuters for comment outside regular U.S. business hours.

(Reporting by Sakthi Prasad in Bangalore; Editing by Lincoln Feast)

AIG CEO, Chairman at odds over failed AIA deal – FT

(Reuters) – American International Group’s (AIG.N) failed sale of its Asian life insurance unit AIA has led to increased tensions between Chief Executive Robert Benmosche and Chairman Harvey Golub, the Financial Times said, citing people close to the situation.

Stocks | Mergers & Acquisitions | IPOs | Global Markets | Financials

AIG is weighing its options for its Asian life insurance unit after a $35.5 billion deal to sell the business to Prudential fell apart.

Benmosche had supported Prudential PLC (PRU.L) deal and argued for accepting a reduction of about $5 billion to help the British company win support from its shareholders, the people told the paper.

However, AIG’s board led by Golub rejected the idea by an overwhelming margin, forcing AIG to go back to its original plan for a public listing of AIA, the FT said.

The divestment of AIA, which could include an IPO, is seen as a key step in AIG’s efforts to repay the government for its $182.3 billion bailout. [ID:nN14222874]

The rift between AIG’s two top executives has triggered concerns within the board and among officials in the U.S. government, who fear one of the two men might leave less than a year after their appointment, the paper said.

However, the relationship between Benmosche and Golub has not yet completely broken down, the people told the paper.

AIG could not immediately be reached by Reuters for comment outside regular U.S. business hours. (Reporting by Sakthi Prasad in Bangalore; Editing by Lincoln Feast)

Mizuho to issue up to 6 bln shares in offering-sources

June 25 (Reuters) – Mizuho Financial Group (8411.T) will decide on Friday to sell up to 6 billion new shares in a planned global offering, increasing the total number of shares outstanding by up to 38 percent, four sources with knowledge of the matter said.

Mizuho had registered with regulators last month to raise up to 800 billion yen in a global offering of new shares to prepare for stricter capital requirements, but had not made an official decision to go ahead with the offering. [ID:nTOE64D069]

The bank, Japan’s second largest by assets, will hold a board meeting on Friday to decide on the number of shares to be issued, among other details, according to the sources, who were not authorised to speak about the matter publicly.

Mizuho’s board is expected to agree to issue up to 6 billion shares, which at the current market price of 155 yen would bring in 930 billion yen ($10.4 billion) in fresh capital, much bigger than what it had originally announced in May.

Mizuho will decide on a per-share price at a later date based on how its stock price performs, and plans to complete the offering next month, the sources said.

The bank will make an official announcement later on Friday, the sources said. (Editing by Chris Gallagher)

Promontory Europe Chairman to Lead IASC Foundation

Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa Named Chairman Of Independent Organization That Develops
Global Accounting Standards
WASHINGTON–(Business Wire)–
Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, Chairman of Promontory Europe, has been appointed
Chairman of the Trustees of the International Accounting Standards Committee
Foundation, the independent body responsible for development and promulgation of
global accounting standards. He will assume the role following a July 6-7
trustees meeting in Washington, D.C.

Mr. Padoa-Schioppa was selected for the post by the IASC Foundation`s Board of
Trustees and appointed by its Monitoring Board, which consists of the
International Organization of Securities Commissions, the US Securities and
Exchange Commission, the European Commission, and the Financial Services Agency
of Japan. He briefly served as chairman of the IASC Foundation in 2006,
succeeding former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, before being appointed
Italian Minister of Economy and Finance.

“The selection underscores Mr. Padoa-Schioppa`s standing as one of the world`s
most knowledgeable experts on regulatory, accounting, and control matters for
financial institutions,” said Eugene A. Ludwig, Founder and CEO of Promontory
Financial Group, the premier global financial services consulting firm. “The
Monitoring Board could not have chosen more wisely. At a time of sweeping change
in global finance, Tommaso is uniquely qualified to drive the creation and
refinement of a single set of high quality accounting standards for the world`s
capital markets.”

Mr. Padoa-Schioppa will retain his role as Chairman of Promontory Europe. He is
leading Promontory`s expansion of operations in Europe and will continue to be
available to Promontory clients in Europe to offer strategic advice and counsel
on risk management, controls, regulatory advice on emerging standards, and other
compliance issues.

In addition to his role with Promontory, Mr. Padoa-Schioppa is President of
Notre Europe, an independent think tank based in Paris that focuses on European
unity. He was Italian Minister of Economy and Finance (2006-2008) and Chairman
of the Ministerial Committee of the International Monetary Fund (2007-08).

From January 2006 until his appointment as Italian Finance Minister five months
later, he served as a Special Adviser to Mr. Ludwig in his role as CEO of
Promontory. He was a member of the first Executive Board of the European Central
Bank (1998-2005). Previously he was Chairman of the Commissione Nazionale per la
Societa e la Borsa (1997-98), Deputy Director General of the Banca d`Italia
(1984-97) and Director General for Economic and Financial Affairs at the
Commission of the European Communities (1979-83).

He has been Joint Secretary to the Delors Committee (1988-89), Chairman of the
Banking Advisory Committee of the EC (1988-91), Chairman of the Basel Committee
on Banking Supervision (1993-97), and Chairman of the Committee on Payment and
Settlement Systems (2000-05).

He is the author of a number of books and articles on economic and financial
matters as well as on European and international affairs.

He graduated from Luigi Bocconi University and has an MSc from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology.

About Promontory Financial Group

Promontory Financial Group is the premier financial services consulting firm,
and was founded in 2000 by former US Comptroller of the Currency Eugene A.
Ludwig. Promontory is headquartered in Washington, D.C., and has 11 offices
across North America, Europe, and Asia.

Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available:

http://www.businesswire.com/cgi-bin/mmg.cgi?eid=6334975〈=en

Promontory Financial Group
Debra Cope (Americas Media)
1-203-384-1011
or
Weber Shandwick Worldwide
Alex Brown (UK and European Media)
011-44-20-70670732

Copyright Business Wire 2010

CORRECTED – CORRECTED-UPDATE 1-Malaysia EON Capital delays EGM on Hong Leong

KUALA LUMPUR, June 22 (Reuters) – Malaysian lender EON Capital (EONP.KL) will delay a shareholder meeting to vote on a buyout offer from Hong Leong Bank, sources with direct knowledge of the matter said, raising the risk its suitor would have to lift its bid or walk away.

EON Capital, expected to announce the date of the meeting on Tuesday, put plans on hold after Hong Kong-based private equity fund Primus Pacific Partners, its biggest single shareholder with a 20 percent stake, said it filed a lawsuit on Monday to block the $1.6 billion deal.

Hong Leong (HLBB.KL), seeking to salvage its plan to create Malaysia’s fourth largest lender, in return put pressure on EON Capital, saying it may walk away from the deal if it does not have shareholder approval by August 15.

The tight deadline raises the chance Hong Leong would raise its bid to move the deal forward but also creates a clear downside risk for EON Capital shareholders that it walks away from the deal, analysts said.

“For now, the share price is capped by the 7.3 ringgit offer price and if this issue is not resolved quickly, there could be a knee-jerk reaction to sell,” David Chong, an analyst at the research unit of RHB Investment Bank said.

“Shareholder relations have clearly broken down at EON and it will take time to repair so that’s definitely a risk,” said Chong, who considers Hong Leong’s offer too low and sees it possible EON would reject it to force a higher offer.

At 0213 GMT, EON Capital shares were unchanged while Hong Leong was down 0.5 percent, in line with the broader market .KLSE.

Hong Leong first offered to buy EON Capital in January but was rebuffed by a board that considered its offer too low. EON shareholders then replaced many the firm’s board members and the new directors backed Hong Leong’s raised bid.

But Primus said the new bid was still not good enough, alleging that the new board members acted in the interest of some shareholders against the interest of others, and the offer was unlawful. A court has set a July 6 date to hear its case.

OSK Research analyst Keith Wee sees a clear downside risk from the delay.

“Assuming that Primus was successful in its legal suit and the offer from HLBank is reversed, we may revert back to our fundamental fair value of 6.80 ringgit,” he said in a note.

EON Capital said late on Monday that it would seek legal advice over the suit. The firm declined to comment on Tuesday but will hold its annual general meeting on Tuesday where it is expected to address the issue.

Hong Leong declined to comment when contacted by Reuters. ($1=3.186 Malaysian Ringgit) (Editing by Valerie Lee)

Archer Media Entertainment Accepts Arjuna Media Bid to Take Over Company

LOS ANGELES–(Business Wire)–
Archer Entertainment Media Communications, Inc. (OTCBB:AEMC) has accepted a bid
by Ian Colhoun, a sixth-generation John Deere family member, to take over the
Company, Archer`s Board of Directors reported today. Michael Jay Solomon,
Arjuna`s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, remarked that the new arrangement
will benefit all shareholders.

“We have agreed to acquire Archer,” Solomon said, “and have arranged funding up
to $20 million to be used for new ventures, including the distribution of
independent films, for which we have identified a robust market.” Colhoun will
serve as President and Chief Operating Officer of Arjuna Media Inc. “We are in
negotiations with several companies to joint venture various enterprises
spanning the entire entertainment arena, including films, television, and
music,” Colhoun said.

Arjuna Chairman Michael Jay Solomon notes that the entertainment industry is in
flux due to an unprecedented series of events, including elusive audience
tastes, a severe recession affecting the spending habits of millions of
entertainment consumers, and uncertainty surrounding the fate of major movie
studios owned by multi-national corporations. “Big companies are averse to
business plans such as found in the film business, that do not predict a
consistency of income. The entertainment industry, by and large, is based on
emotion, both of the producers and their shifting audience`s discernment. It
requires experience, bravery, and a certain amount of risk to succeed, whose
concerns present opportunities to a company like Arjuna.”

Arjuna Media`s business plan is deliberately conservative, and the Company will
not produce nor fund production, but will instead capitalize itself through
direct investment and joint venturing opportunities with leading film
entertainment management teams and major Wall Street and International sources
of capital.

About Arjuna Media

Arjuna Media Incorporated makes investments in media companies that distribute
independent motion pictures, television product and sporting events to movie
theatres, all forms of television outlets, and digital platforms. Arjuna does
not produce its content; the company is focused on risk adverse product
distribution. The Company’s executives are senior in their field, they have
seasoned and respected talent, Key business relationships plus the exceptionally
successful and honored management skills that solidly position them to build a
leading film distribution company delivering strong financial returns for
investors.

Forward-Looking Statements

Any statements contained in this press release that refer to future events or
other non-historical matters are forward-looking statements. Arjuna Media, Inc.
disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are based on Arjuna Media Inc.`s reasonable
expectations as of the date of this press release and are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from current
expectations. The information discussed in this release is subject to various
risks and uncertainties related to changes in Arjuna Media, Inc.`s business
prospects, government regulations, results of operations or financial condition,
and such other risks and uncertainties as detailed from time to time in Arjuna
Media, Inc.`s public filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Arjuna Media Incorporated
Ian Colhoun, President and COO
310-709-2245
ian@arjunamediainc.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

NorDiag ASA: NORD – Commencement of last possible exercise period for Class B Warrants

According to a resolution by the extraordinary general meeting on 18 December 2009,
today is the first day of the last possible exercise period for Class B Warrants in
Nordiag ASA. Class B Warrants may be exercised in the period 15-30 June 2010

According to the amended exercise terms, which were resolved by the extraordinary
general meeting on 18 December 2009, each Class B Warrant gives the right to require
issued 3.38323 new shares in NorDiag ASA, each with a nominal value of NOK 1, at a
subscription price of NOK 2.18 per share, provided that fractional shares will not be
issued.

According to the resolution by the general meeting, B-Warrants shall be exercised by way
of written notification to the NorDiag’s Board of Directors, clearly instructing the
company that the subscription right shall be exercised, and including the number of
shares to be subscribed.

The company requests that such instructions are sent by e-mail to: investor@nordiag.com
mailto:investor@nordiag.com or to fax no. +47 22 02 65 66.

Contact:

CFO Tone Kvåle Phone + 47 915 19576

About NorDiag:

NorDiag is a biotechnology company developing, manufacturing and marketing automated
solutions (instruments and reagents) for sample preparation of DNA from difficult
biological samples for large and small laboratories. NorDiag was founded in 2003 and has
its headquarters in Oslo, Norway. The company has offices and laboratories in Stockholm,
Sweden, in West Chester (PA), USA and in Vienna, Austria. The group has today 35.3
man-labor years. NorDiag is listed on Oslo Stock Exchange with ticker NORD.

For further information – www.nordiag.com http://www.nordiag.com/ .

This information is subject of the disclosure requirements acc. to §5-12 vphl (Norwegian
Securities Trading Act)

Indian shares flip-flop; Reliance Comm jumps

MUMBAI, June 15 (Reuters) – Indian shares seesawed on
Tuesday as Moody’s downgrade of Greece’s debt to junk status
revived concerns about the woes in euro zone and halted a
rebound in world markets.

Traders said investor sentiment was fragile and a fresh
bout of risk aversion could dent foreign fund inflows that were
slowly picking up after a selloff in May.

Reliance Communications (RLCM.BO) bucked the trend rallied
as much as 5.2 percent after the No. 2 Indian mobile operator’s
board approved a proposal to bring investors into its telecoms
tower arm. [ID:nSGE65E04E]

On Tuesday, the Economic Times named American Tower
(AMT.N), a consortium of private equity firm Blackstone (BX.N)
and Crown Castle International (CCI.N), and India’s GTL
(GTL.BO) among suitors for Reliance Comm’s tower unit.
[ID:nSGE65E026]

By 11:19 a.m. (0549 GMT), the 30-share BSE index .BSESN
was trading down 0.12 percent at 17,317.11, with half of its
components declining.

Deven Choksey, managing director and CEO of KR Choksey
Shares, he expected foreign institutional investors (FII) to
continue investing in India but probably at a slower pace.

“FII flow will not come with a bang,” he said. “It will
definitely flow gradually. They would not want to miss out on
India’s growth story.”

Data last week showed India’s factory output grew an annual
17.6 percent in April, with manufacturing growth matching its
fastest pace in at least 15 years.
Foreign funds have bought shares worth nearly $358 million in
June after dumping $2 billion last month.

Banks edged lower after rising in recent sessions. The
sector index .BSEBANK was down 0.5 percent after gaining 3.8
percent over four previous sessions.

Top lender State Bank of India (SBI.BO) was down 0.3
percent while rivals ICICI Bank (ICBK.BO) and HDFC Bank
(HDBK.BO) shed 1.1 percent and 0.6 percent respectively.

Metals rose on short-covering and as they caught up with
the recent underperformance compared with the broader market,
dealers said.

The sector index .BSEMET was up 1.1 percent but still
down nearly 16 percent since the start of May.

Non-ferrous metals producer Sterlite Industries (STRL.BO)
and aluminium producer Hindalco (HALC.BO) rose 2.9 percent and
0.4 percent respectively.

Tata steel (TISC.BO), the world’s eighth-largest steel
maker by output, rose 0.5 percent.

Energy giant Reliance Industries (RELI.BO), which has the
highest weight on the Sensex, was down 0.8 percent. It had
risen 6.7 percent in the past four sessions.

In the broader market, gainers led losers in a ratio of
1.5:1 on volume of 163 million shares.

The 50-share NSE index was down 0.1 percent at
5,194.

STOCKS ON THE MOVE

* MMTC (MMTC.BO) jumped 22.1 percent to 34,840 rupees after
the state-run trading firm said it would consider a bonus issue
and stock split on June 29. [ID:nWNBS0330]

* Mahindra Satyam (SATY.BO) was down 1.4 percent at 87.65
rupees after the IT services firm said on Monday it had sought
more time from authorities to file financial statements
relating to fiscal years 2008 and 2009, delaying its merger
with Tech Mahindra (TEML.BO). [ID:nSGE65D0GM]

Tech Mahindra was down 0.9 percent at 732.90 rupees.

MAIN TOP 3 BY VOLUME

* Reliance Natural Resources (RENR.BO) on 13.4 million
shares

* Ennore Coke (ENCK.BO) on 5.7 million shares

* Suzlon Energy (SUZL.BO) on 5.1 million shares

FACTORS TO WATCH
* For technical analysis double click on www.reutersindia.net
* Indian rupee report
[INR/]
* Indian bond report
[IN/]
* Euro bounce running out of steam on profit-taking
[FRX/]
* Oil above $75; Asian demand offsets Greece downgrade
[O/R]
* Asian shares slip as Moody’s downgrades Greece
[MKTS/GLOB]
* Wall St’s gains melt as Moody’s cuts Greece rating
[.N]
* For closing rates of Indian ADRs
INADR

Sun TV founder to buy into SpiceJet; make open offer

(Reuters) – The founder of Sun TV (SUTV.BO) Kalanithi Maran and his unlisted aviation firm Kal Airways have agreed to buy 37.7 percent in budget airline SpiceJet Ltd (SPJT.BO) and will make an open offer for a further 20 percent, SpiceJet said on Monday.

Maran will buy the stake from U.S. investor Wilbur Ross and Royal Holdings Services Ltd, owned by the Kansagra family, for 47.25 rupees a share for a total consideration of about 7.39 billion rupees, the airline said in an advertisement in the Business Standard paper.

The deal has been struck at a discount of over 14 percent to the current market price.

Maran, who runs 20 television channels and two general newspapers in south India, will buy 30.23 percent from Ross, who holds stake through foreign currency convertible bonds, and 7.49 percent from the Kansagra family, SpiceJet said.

Last week SpiceJet had allotted 41.8 million shares to various funds held by WL Ross & Company, on partial conversion of FCCBs.

The airline’s board had approved Maran’s acquisition proposal on June 12, it said in a statement to the BSE.

Maran will make the mandatory open offer for 82.98 million shares at 57.76 rupees a share, SpiceJet added.

“It’s a positive for the shareholders as they are making the open offer at around the market price itself and even the fundamentals of the company are quite strong,” said Sharan Lillaney, analyst with Angel Broking, who has an “accumulate” rating on the stock.

SpiceJet had swung to a net profit of 274 million rupees in Jan-March against a loss of 78 million rupees a year ago, as air traffic surged.

“It does appear to be a good time for Maran to enter the Indian aviation space. But we need to understand what his future course of action will be,” another Mumbai-based airline analyst said.

Rapid economic growth and a surge in air traffic has renewed interest in India’s aviation sector.

Globally, too, the outlook is changing with the International Air Transport Association (IATA) expecting its members to report a collective $2.5 billion in profit this year versus an earlier prediction of a loss of $2.8 billion.

At 10:32 a.m., SpiceJet shares were up 0.18 percent at 56.15 rupees in a firm Mumbai market.

(Reporting by Aniruddha Basu; Editing by Sunil Nair)

((aniruddha.basu@thomsonreuters.com; +91 22 6636 9286; Reuters Messaging: aniruddha.basu.reuters.com@reuters.net))

(If you have a query or comment on this story, send an email to newsfeedback.asia@thomsonreuters.com) Keywords: SPICEJET/ OFFER

(C) Reuters 2010. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution ofReuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expresslyprohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuterssphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group ofcompanies around the world.nSGE65D04R

Day Software Holding AG: Day Software Board Member Greg Williams Resigns

Day Software Holding AG / Day Software Board Member Greg Williams Resigns processed and
transmitted by Hugin AS. The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this
announcement.

Basel, Switzerland and Boston, Massachusetts – 13 June 2010 – Day Software Holding AG
(SIX: DAYN, OTCQX: DYIHY), a provider of open, standards-based content management and
content infrastructure software, today announced that Greg Williams formally resigned
from Day’s Board of Directors. Williams’ resignation will take effect at Day’s Annual
General Meeting on 17 June 2010.

“I’ve had the pleasure of serving on Day’s Board for many years and seeing the great
success Day’s management team has achieved with its global expansion since the release
of Day’s CQ5 platform,” said Greg Williams. “Day has a unique solution, an outstanding
team, and an exciting opportunity to continue its momentum as organizations across the
globe look to drive new business through their online channel. Although I am now
resigning from my duties on Day’s Board, I will continue to look forward to hearing
about Day’s continued success.”

About Day – www.day.com

Day Software is the ECM pioneer that leading global enterprises rely on for their Web
2.0 content application and content infrastructure needs. Day’s Content Repository
Extreme (CRX) is the industry’s leading Java Content Repository (JCR) that provides
unique virtualization services to consolidate legacy repositories and unique cloud
computing services to lower IT operational costs. Day’s

CQ5

platform provides industry-leading Web Content Management, Digital Asset Management, and
Social Collaboration in a single, unified suite and won the 2009 InfoWorld Technology of
the Year Award for “Best Web CMS”.

Day is an international company with headquarters in Basel, Switzerland and Boston,
Massachusetts, traded since April 2000 on the SIX Swiss Exchange, and “Over the Counter”
(OTC) as American Depositary Receipts (OTCQX:DYIHY). Day’s customers are worldwide
leading global enterprises, including: Adobe, Audi, Volkswagen, Daimler, General Motors,
Nissan, Newsweek, MTV Networks, Virgin Media, University of Phoenix, InterContinental
Hotels Group, and McDonald’s.

For further information

Peter Nachbur

Day Software AG

Barfuesserplatz 6

4001 Basel, Switzerland

T +41 61 226 98 98

E-Mail: peter.nachbur@day.com

HUG#1423494

GregWilliamsJune2010EN http://hugin.info/131802/R/1423494/372353.pdf

— End of Message —

Day Software Holding AG
Barfüsserplatz 6 Basel Schweiz

ISIN: CH0010474218;
Listed: Freiverkehr in Börse Stuttgart,
Freiverkehr in Börse Berlin,
Open Market (Freiverkehr) in Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse;

China’s Fosun acquires 7.1 percent of Club Med

(Reuters) – Fosun, China’s largest non-government controlled group, has acquired 7.1 percent of holiday resort operator Club Med, the first time a quoted Chinese group has taken a direct holding in a listed French company.

Deals | China

Club Med hopes to make the China its No.2 market in the next five years while Fosun is keen to invest in Club Med, whose all-in one, integrated resorts appeal to well-heeled Chinese.

Fosun’s board is chaired by the tycoon Guo Guangchang, one of China’s richest men. Using Friday’s closing stock market price, Fosun’s Club Med stake is worth 23.38 million euros ($28.14 million).

The Chinese tourism market is estimated to have grown by about 10 percent a year and Club Med is hoping to attract 200,000 Chinese customers by 2015.

Club Med said it aimed to open five villages in China by then and would inaugurate its first village this winter in Yabuli, the largest ski resort in north-east China.

As part of the deal, Fosun pledged not to lift its stake beyond 10 percent if it reached that level, at least during the following 24 months, subject to no other shareholder having or wishing to acquire more than 10 percent.

Fosun said a representative would join Club Med’s board and if its Club Med holding went beyond 9 percent, Fosun would appoint a second representative.

Shares in Club Med rose earlier this month after the French company said it was in talks with a Chinese partner, without providing details, as investors welcomed the arrival of a Chinese investor.

The stock, which has lost around 10 percent since January 1, is expected to rise on Monday when trading resumes.

“Fosun will not only support Club Med’s global strategy of upscale positioning and sharing China’s growth opportunities,” Guangchang said in a joint-statement with Club Med.

“But also use this opportunity to benchmark itself with international brands and standards in order to improve its ability to consolidate resources and manage its investment.”

In additional to financial support, Club Med said it planned to rely on Fosun’s local input regarding human resources, conference management, media and communications.

Fosun International, a company founded in 1992, operates in several markets, including real estate, steel, pharmaceuticals, mining and retail.

It has directly or indirectly invested in more than 100 companies, including Sinopharm Group, China’s largest distributor of pharmaceutical products, outdoor advertiser Focus Media Holding and Nanjing Iron & Steel.

(Additional reporting by Alan Wheatley in Beijing)

(Editing by Louise Heavens)

UPDATE 2-China’s Fosun acquires 7.1 pct of Club Med

PARIS June 13 (Reuters) – Fosun, China’s largest non-government controlled group, has acquired 7.1 percent of holiday resort operator Club Med (CMIP.PA), the first time a quoted Chinese group has taken a direct holding in a listed French company.

Club Med hopes to make the China its No.2 market in the next five years while Fosun (0656.HK) is keen to invest in Club Med, whose all-in one, integrated resorts appeal to well-heeled Chinese.

Fosun’s board is chaired by the tycoon Guo Guangchang, one of China’s richest men. Using Friday’s closing stock market price, Fosun’s Club Med stake is worth 23.38 million euros ($28.14 million).

The Chinese tourism market is estimated to have grown by about 10 percent a year and Club Med is hoping to attract 200,000 Chinese customers by 2015.

Club Med said it aimed to open five villages in China by then and would inaugurate its first village this winter in Yabuli, the largest ski resort in north-east China.

As part of the deal, Fosun pledged not to lift its stake beyond 10 percent if it reached that level, at least during the following 24 months, subject to no other shareholder having or wishing to acquire more than 10 percent.

Fosun said a representative would join Club Med’s board and if its Club Med holding went beyond 9 percent, Fosun would appoint a second representative.

Shares in Club Med rose earlier this month after the French company said it was in talks with a Chinese partner, without providing details, as investors welcomed the arrival of a Chinese investor.

The stock, which has lost around 10 percent since Jan. 1, is expected to rise on Monday when trading resumes.

“Fosun will not only support Club Med’s global strategy of upscale positioning and sharing China’s growth opportunities,” Guangchang said in a joint-statement with Club Med.

“But also use this opportunity to benchmark itself with international brands and standards in order to improve its ability to consolidate resources and manage its investment.”

In additional to financial support, Club Med said it planned to rely on Fosun’s local input regarding human resources, conference management, media and communications.

Fosun International, a company founded in 1992, operates in several markets, including real estate, steel, pharmaceuticals, mining and retail.

It has directly or indirectly invested in more than 100 companies, including Sinopharm Group (1099.HK), China’s largest distributor of pharmaceutical products, outdoor advertiser Focus Media Holding (FMCN.O) and Nanjing Iron & Steel (600282.SS). (Additional reporting by Alan Wheatley in Beijing) (Editing by Louise Heavens)