Q+A: Will BP spill taint Cameron’s U.S. visit?

(Reuters) – David Cameron is making his first trip to the United States as British prime minister on Tuesday and Wednesday, a visit expected to be overshadowed by the BP Plc oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Cameron will meet President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and congressional leaders then travel to New York for talks with business leaders and at the United Nations.

Here are some questions and answers about the visit.

WILL OBAMA AND CAMERON DISCUSS THE SPILL?

The two leaders will address a range of issues that will definitely include the oil spill, aides say.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said they would discuss issues including Afghanistan, the global economy and the Middle East, with Afghanistan “first and foremost” on the list.

The two men have discussed the spill during two of their three telephone conversations to date and it came up during their first face-to-face meeting since Cameron became prime minister in May, during the Group of Eight and Group of 20 meetings in Canada last month.

“The conversation is likely to be drawn into a larger discussion about BP on two fronts,” wrote Heather Conley and Rick Nelson of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

The first, they said, is ensuring BP cleans up, compensates residents and restores the Gulf Coast after the disaster while remaining financially solvent.

They also said Obama and Cameron were likely to discuss whether the British oil giant had any influence over the release of the Lockerbie bomber, Abdel Basset al-Megrahi, from a Scottish prison last year.

WILL THE LOCKERBIE BOMBER COME UP?

Cameron’s office has tried to play down the concern, saying the U.S. debate over how the ill Libyan convicted of the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am flight was allowed to return home “may come up” but is not a “major issue.”

BP has confirmed it lobbied the British government in late 2007 over a prisoner transfer agreement with Libya but said it was not involved in talks on the release of al-Megrahi, which was strongly opposed by the Obama administration.

“Our viewpoint on this case last year was well-known and that was we opposed the release of the Lockerbie bomber. We made that opinion known,” Gibbs said, noting that Cameron — who was not prime minister when Megrahi was sent to Libya — also opposed the release.

But Gibbs said he expected the issue would come up in some form between Obama and Cameron, who said on BBC television: “I’ve no idea what BP did. I’m not responsible for BP.”

U.S. lawmakers have demanded an investigation but Cameron’s office said it had no plans to re-examine the case. “That will be up to the British government to determine,” Gibbs said.

The four U.S. senators from New York and New Jersey who want an investigation have been invited to meet Cameron on Tuesday night.

“He understands the strengths of feelings on this issue,” Cameron’s spokesman said.

WILL BP AFFECT THE “SPECIAL” RELATIONSHIP?

Washington and London have had their differences over the BP spill since it started in late April.

Obama has sought to convince Americans he is taking a tough stance against the giant oil firm to ensure it pays for the worst oil spill in U.S. history. And Cameron has said he will stand up for BP in Washington, worried that the firm could face unreasonable compensation claims from businesses and families affected by the spill.

But the disaster is not expected to put a long-term damper on the vaunted “special relationship” between the United States and Britain — at least as long as a new cap on the well holds and the cleanup goes well.

Obama and Cameron were eager to display their closeness when they met in Canada last month. Obama gave the new prime minister a ride in his helicopter and the two held a separate bilateral meeting in Toronto, at which they exchanged beers related to a bet over World Cup soccer.

Cameron’s Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government is aware Britain needs to build other special ties to maintain its influence and help its economy bounce back from recession. But Cameron is an outspoken fan of the American way of life and is not likely to distance himself from Washington.

In developing his relationship with Obama, the Conservative prime minister is likely to seek middle ground between what was seen as former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair’s subordinate “poodle” relationship with former U.S. President George W. Bush and the businesslike tone set by Gordon Brown, the Labour prime minister who preceded Cameron, the CSIS experts said.

The tone also could be affected by the cool personal style of Obama, who is not known for warm personal relationships with other world leaders.

(Editing by Patricia Wilson and John O’Callaghan)

Obama, Netanyahu to meet July 6, discuss Gaza blockade

June 20 (Reuters) – The White House on Sunday hailed Israel’s easing of its land blockade of Gaza and said President Barack Obama would discuss “additional steps” with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a Washington visit on July 6.

“We believe that the implementation of the policy announced by the government of Israel today should improve life for the people of Gaza, and we will continue to support that effort going forward,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement.

Israel unveiled new procedures on Sunday to ease its land blockade on Gaza, saying it would start allowing in all goods except for weapons and materials that can be used to make them. Israel has been under pressure to loosen restrictions since a deadly May 31 raid on an aid flotilla bound for the Hamas-ruled coastal enclave. (Reporting by Matt Spetalnick)

Israel to set up own inquiry into Gaza ship raid

JERUSALEM, June 13 (Reuters) – Israel said on Sunday it would set up its own investigation into a deadly raid on a convoy of Gaza-bound aid ships, and that its panel would include two foreign observers.

The internal inquiry into the March 31 raid, which falls short of a U.N. proposal for an international investigation, was decided on after consultations with the United States.

The White House welcomed the move as an important step and said Israel was capable of conducting a fair investigation.

“But we will not prejudge the process or its outcome, and will await the conduct and findings of the investigation before drawing further conclusions,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said in a statement the government would give its final approval on Monday to forming an “independent public commission” into whether or not Israel had conformed to international law in imposing a naval blockade on the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

Israel said its commandos killed nine pro-Palestinian Turkish activists when they boarded a Turkish-flagged aid vessel and were attacked by passengers wielding metal rods and knives.

The committee will examine the flotilla members, as well.

Amid an international outcry over the bloodshed, Israel has faced mounting pressure to investigate the events surrounding the flotilla raid and to ease or lift its blockade.

Hamas Islamists, who refuse to recognise Israel and renounce violence, seized control of the Gaza Strip in 2007.

FOREIGN PARTICIPATION

Netanyahu said on Sunday Israel would continue discussions with the international community to prevent weapons and military equipment from reaching Gaza and to allow in humanitarian aid, an apparent signal it was open to revising blockade procedures.

The statement said a retired Israeli Supreme Court judge, Jacob Turkel, would head a committee on which two other Israelis and the two foreign observers would sit.

“In light of the exceptional circumstances of the incident, it was decided to appoint two foreign experts who will serve as observers,” the statement said.

The statement listed David Trimble, a Northern Ireland politician and Nobel Peace Prize winner, and Canadian jurist Ken Watkin as the foreigners who would take part in the hearings and deliberations but not have the right to vote.

“The commission may request any information from the Prime Minister, the Minister of Defence, other ministers and the Israel Defence Forces Chief-of-Staff,” the statement said.

The Israeli military has announced its own investigation, focusing on the operational aspects of a raid seen by many in Israel as a fiasco in which planners failed to gauge the strength of resistance on board.

Officers and soldiers would not testify at the government-ordered inquiry, which would rely on the statements they made to the military panel, Netanyahu’s office said.

The commission will publish its report when finished.

“While Israel should be afforded the time to complete its process, we expect Israel’s commission and military investigation will be carried out promptly,” the White House statement said.

“We also expect that, upon completion, its findings will be presented publicly and will be presented to the international community.” (Additional reporting by Caren Bohan in Washington)

U.S. welcomes Israel inquiry on flotilla events

(Reuters) – The United States on Sunday welcomed Israel’s decision to begin an internal investigation into the events surrounding last month’s raid on a convoy of Gaza-bound aid ships.

Politics

A statement by White House spokesman Robert Gibbs called the proposal for the probe “an important step forward” and said Israel was capable of conducting a fair investigation into the deadly flotilla raid.

“But we will not prejudge the process or its outcome, and will await the conduct and findings of the investigation before drawing further conclusions,” the statement said.

(Writing by Caren Bohan; Editing by Sandra Maler)

U.S. welcomes Israel inquiry on flotilla events

June 13 (Reuters) – The United States on Sunday welcomed Israel’s decision to begin an internal investigation into the events surrounding last month’s raid on a convoy of Gaza-bound aid ships.

A statement by White House spokesman Robert Gibbs called the proposal for the probe “an important step forward” and said Israel was capable of conducting a fair investigation into the deadly flotilla raid.

“But we will not prejudge the process or its outcome, and will await the conduct and findings of the investigation before drawing further conclusions,” the statement said.

(Writing by Caren Bohan; Editing by Sandra Maler)

Oil spill forces Obama to postpone foreign travel

(Reuters) – With the worst oil spill in U.S. history presenting a key test of his presidency, President Barack Obama postponed a trip scheduled for this month to Australia and Indonesia, the White House said early on Friday.

Politics | Indonesia | Barack Obama

It was the second time in a little more than two months that Obama canceled a trip to the two countries. He previously was due to have gone in March but postponed to stay at home to give a final push to his healthcare overhaul plan in Congress.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told Reuters in an email that Obama postponed the trip again in order to deal with the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and other important issues.

The president is due to travel to the Louisiana Gulf coast to visit affected communities on Friday, his third trip there since an April 20 offshore oil rig explosion that killed 11 workers and triggered the huge spill.

After a series of failed attempts to plug the gushing mile-deep BP-owned oil well, the Obama administration has come under growing pressure to take a more direct role in the oil spill crisis. Opinion polls show many Americans are unhappy with Obama’s handling of the disaster so far.

In an already difficult congressional election year for Obama’s fellow Democrats, a foreign trip in the midst of what the president himself has called an unprecedented environmental catastrophe would have been hard to sell to Americans frustrated and angered by the six-week-old crisis.

The White House said in a statement that Obama had spoken on Thursday night to Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to inform them of his decision. The trip had been scheduled for June 13-19.

“President Obama underscored his commitment to our close alliance with Australia and our deepening partnership with Indonesia. He plans to hold full bilateral meetings with Prime Minister Rudd and President Yudhoyono on the margins of the G-20 meeting in Canada,” the White House said in a statement.

RARE CANCELLATION

The rare double cancellation of a presidential trip abroad underscored how Obama’s challenges at home have begun complicating his activity overseas.

The trip would have been his first major foreign travel this year and was aimed at deepening U.S. ties in the Asia-Pacific region in the face of rising Chinese influence.

Indonesia is the world’s most populous Muslim nation and where he spent four years as a child. Australia is a stalwart U.S. friend in the Pacific and key military ally in Afghanistan.

There was no immediate response from the two countries to the White House announcement.

Cleaning up the biggest oil spill in U.S. history and capping the well has become Obama’s top priority, complicating his efforts to keep the focus on job creation in an economy in which unemployment is still close to 10 percent nationwide.

The White House announcement on the trip came shortly after BP managed to lower a containment cap onto its ruptured deep-sea wellhead to siphon off some of the billowing oil. U.S. authorities called it a positive development.

Obama said in an interview with CNN’s Larry King broadcast on Thursday night that he was furious at the situation in the Gulf of Mexico and again vowed to hold BP accountable.

“It’s imperiling not just a handful of people,” he said of the oil spill. “This is imperiling an entire way of life and an entire region for potentially years.”

From the beginning of the crisis, the Obama administration has sought to show that it is control, but it has struggled to shake off a public perception that it has been too reliant on BP for solutions and too slow to bring the full force of the federal government to bear on the crisis.

Obama said on Thursday that his administration had mobilized scientists, hundreds of ships and thousands of military personnel to deal with the disaster.

Analysts say Obama’s fellow Democrats risk being punished in November congressional elections that are already expected to erode their majorities in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

(Reporting by Ross Colvin; Editing by Will Dunham)

Obama tells military: prepare for N.Korea aggression

President Barack Obama has directed the U.S. military to coordinate with South Korea to “ensure readiness” and deter future aggression from North Korea, the White House said on Monday.

The United States gave strong backing to plans by South Korean President Lee Myung-bak to punish North Korea for sinking one of its naval ships, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement.

The White House urged North Korea to apologize and change its behavior, he said.

“We endorse President Lee’s demand that North Korea immediately apologize and punish those responsible for the attack, and, most importantly, stop its belligerent and threatening behavior,” Gibbs said.

“U.S. support for South Korea’s defense is unequivocal, and the president has directed his military commanders to coordinate closely with their Republic of Korea counterparts to ensure readiness and to deter future aggression,” he said.

Obama and Lee have agreed to meet at the G20 summit in Canada next month, he said.

Late last week, a team of international investigators accused North Korea of torpedoing the Cheonan corvette in March, killing 46 sailors in one of the deadliest clashes between the two since the 1950-53 Korean War.

Lee said on Monday South Korea would bring the issue before the U.N., whose past sanctions have damaged the already ruined North Korean economy.

The United States still has about 28,000 troops in South Korea to provide military support.

The two Koreas, still technically at war, have more than 1 million troops near their border.

“We will build on an already strong foundation of excellent cooperation between our militaries and explore further enhancements to our joint posture on the Peninsula as part of our ongoing dialogue,” Gibbs said.

Gibbs said the United States supported Lee’s plans to bring the issue to the United Nations Security Council and would work with allies to “reduce the threat that North Korea poses to regional stability.”

Obama had also directed U.S. agencies to evaluate existing policies towards North Korea.

“This review is aimed at ensuring that we have adequate measures in place and to identify areas where adjustments would be appropriate,” he said.

(Editing by Doina Chiacu)

White House backs South Korea move to punish North

The White House on Monday gave strong backing to plans by South Korean President Lee Myung-bak to punish North Korea for sinking one of its naval ships.

“We endorse President Lee’s demand that North Korea immediately apologize and punish those responsible for the attack, and, most importantly, stop its belligerent and threatening behavior,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement.

“U.S. support for South Korea’s defense is unequivocal, and the president has directed his military commanders to coordinate closely with their Republic of Korea counterparts to ensure readiness and to deter future aggression,” he said.

(Reporting by Jeff Mason; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

McChrystal in ‘damage control’ mode after US’ ‘tough line’ with Pak post NY plot

Washington, May 11 (ANI): General Stanley McChrystal, the top US Commander in Afghanistan, has rubbished media reports that soon after the failed Times Square bombing he met Pakistan Army Chief General Parvez Kayani in Islamabad and asked him to launch a military offensive in North Waziristan.

“Yes, there was an unfortunate news story that came out that was completely inaccurate that represented that I had expressed to General Kayani US policy on doing more, and that just didn”t happen,” said General McChrystal, who commands US and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

“It was a one-on-one meeting and it did not occur. And I”d made it clear to Gen Kayani that I did not represent it that way,” he explained during a White House briefing.

Speaking during the briefing on Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai’s visit to Washington, White House’ Press Secretary Robert Gibbs tried to tone down the tension between the US and Pakistan, which has seen the Obama Administration openly warning Islamabad over its lack of action against extremists flourishing on its soil.

Commenting on Secretary of States Hillary Clinton’s stern warning to Pakistan that it would have to face “very severe consequences” if militants succeeded in attacking the US, Gibbs said the Pakistan government was also aware about the threat posed by the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which is widely believed to have trained and assisted Faisal Shahzad, the confessed Times Square bomber.

“The Pakistani government recognises the threat that Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan poses to them, just as we recognise the threat it poses to us,” The Dawn quoted Gibbs, as saying.

“I think there is, without a doubt, an alignment of interest in understanding where that threat is and what it poses,” he added, while denying reports of any confrontation between US and Pakistan. (ANI)

Pakistan taking ‘aggressive action’ against terrorists, says US

Washington, May 7 (IANS) As Times Square bombing attempt suspect Faisal Shahzad was linked to terror groups in his homeland, the United States came to the aid of its key ally saying of late Islamabad has been taking ‘aggressive action’ against militants.

‘Pakistan has for a number of years been taking aggressive action,’ State Department spokesman Philip J. Crowley told reporters Thursday denying suggestions Pakistan was not taking action against terrorist groups.

Pakistan was doing so as it ‘came to realise that groups within its borders, even groups that entities from the Pakistani government has had historical relations with, now in fact threaten Pakistan just as much as they threaten other countries in the region and other regions of the world,’ he said.

Crowley’s remark was an obvious reference to Pakistani spy agency ISI’s well known ties with militant groups responsible for terror attacks in India.

‘I think we are very satisfied with the pace of action that Pakistan has taken over the last couple of years,’ he said.

‘Pakistan itself, you know, will be the first to tell you that it is doing a lot.

‘And over time, it will have to do more in order to defeat these groups that threaten the state of Pakistan, threaten

the regional security and obviously pose a risk to the United States as well,’ Crowley said.

Once the US was able to ‘understand what kind of support might have been given’ to the Times Square suspect Faisal Shahzad ‘we’ll pass that on to Pakistan. And we would hope that Pakistan will take appropriate action in place,’ he said.

But Crowley refused to entertain a suggestion that ‘all these terrorists come’ from Pakistan. ‘I’m not going to entertain a question that-that implicates one country, and to suggest that all terrorism in the world is the responsibility of one country. That’s not true,’ he said.

At the White House, spokesman Robert Gibbs parried questions whether Shahzad ‘s possible contacts in Pakistan and the role of Pakistan Taliban had come up for discussion during President Barack Obama’s meeting with his key aides on the Pakistan Afghnaistan situation.

‘I will just say that in the hour and 15 minutes the President spent in that room it was a comprehensive discussion of all of our issues dealing with Afghanistan and Pakistan,’ he said.

Asked if the US was ‘pleased or satisfied with Pakistan’s cooperation’ on the Times Square case investigation so far, Gibbs responded with just a ‘Yes.’

‘I think if you look back over the course of 15 or 16 months of our administration, we have dramatically increased our partnership with Pakistan-intense security cooperation, supporting Pakistan’s largest offensive against terrorism within its borders in years,’ he said.

‘The offensive that was-is focused not just on Al Qaeda, but on the Pakistani Taliban as well.’

Asked if the emergence of North Waziristan as a hotbed of terrorist activity and terrorist training was discussed, Gibbs said: ‘Suffice to say that many regions in Pakistan have been the focus of our cooperative work with Pakistan, the government of Pakistan for the length of our administration, understanding that we have a threat that continues from that region of the world.’

Meanwhile, US Attorney General Eric Holder told a Congressional Committee that if convicted Shahzad faces a potential life sentence.

‘Although this car bomb failed to properly detonate, this plot was yet another reminder that terrorists are still plotting to kill Americans,’ he said.

Faisal Shahzad: terrorist or criminal? The debate rages on

New York, May 5 (ANI): The debate over whether terrorists should be treated at par with criminals or whether they should be considered enemy combatants has erupted once again following the arrest of Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad and the reading out of his Miranda rights as is constitutionally guaranteed to every criminal in US.

The White House has said that Shahzad was first grilled by law enforcement agencies in an exception to Miranda. Shahzad remained cooperative through the interrogation said officials.

However, those who believe that terrorists should not have the same entitlements as other criminals were unimpressed by this rationale.

“The Supreme Court has held there”s no constitutional obligation to give him Miranda rights,” Representative Pete King told the New York Daily News, referring to the right to remain silent and get a lawyer.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs scoffed at the idea investigators were passing up valuable intelligence. “The insinuation somehow that that is not the case,” Gibbs said.

And he mocked politicians who downplayed the fact that Shahzad is American. “Some of the comments have been curious,” Gibbs said.

“One of the comments was, ”I know he”s an American citizen, but still…” A unique viewpoint,” he countered.

King is among those who hold an opposing view, he argued that if a terror suspect is found not guilty, authorities could simply let him go.

“You can”t always be operating in a time of war on the presumption that you might be wrong, especially when you”re not inflicting any permanent harm on the guy,” King said. (ANI)

US National Security Adviser says sorry for Jewish joke

Washington, Apr.27 (ANI): US National Security Adviser, Lt. Gen (retired) James Jones, has apologized for a Jewish joke that he made last week to kick off an address.

According to a Christian Science Monitor (CSM) report, when Lt. Gen. Jones made the joke, the room erupted in laughter at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a pro-Israel organization.

Apparently not everyone in the room was amused, and by Monday, when the Israeli paper Haaretz published a story, a full-fledged international incident was born.

On Monday, Jones issued an apology. In addition, the White House did not include the off-the-cuff joke in its official transcript of his remarks.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs denied any cover-up.

“It was obviously an on-camera speech. There was no attempt to deceive,” Gibbs said as per a Fox News report.

“I wish that I had not made this off the cuff joke at the top of my remarks, and I apologize to anyone who was offended by it. It also distracted from the larger message I carried that day: that the United States commitment to Israel”s security is sacrosanct,” Jones said. (ANI)

Obama’s top aide on battling the bulge

New York, April 21 (ANI): US President Barack Obama’s press secretary, Robert Gibbs, has revealed that the work pressure during the leader’s election campaign took its toll on his health.

But the 39-year-old has also admitted that he is now relaxed into his job and is finding enough time during the workday to go kayaking and bike riding, and then tweeting about it to his 55,600 followers.

“The truth is, having travelled with [Obama] on the campaign, you””re working so much and by the end of the day, you””re just so exhausted, I let my health go. I gained weight,” the New York Post quoted Gibbs, 39, as telling Daily Beast.

On Thursday, he tweeted: “Just spent 45 mins kayaking Potomac — beautiful on the water — 1st day open for Jack””s Boathouse (Water St under Key Bridge — check it out).”

On Saturday, he said: “Just finished 15 miles on the new bike — more hills and lots of wind today but still a pretty day.”(ANI)

U.S. seeks to heal rift with Karzai

(Reuters) – Top U.S. officials sought to repair Washington’s troubled relationship with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, calling him a reliable partner and pledging to treat him with greater sensitivity.

Barack Obama

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton both described Karzai as a constructive player in trying to stabilize Afghanistan and distanced themselves from people outside the administration who have described his behavior as erratic. Their comments were made in television interviews taped on Friday but aired on Sunday,

“Some of these outlandish claims that are being made and accusations that are being hurled are really unfortunate,” Clinton told CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

“This is a leader who is under enormous pressure,” she said. “And I wonder sometimes how anybody can cope with the kind of relentless stress that you face after having been in some military activity or war footing for 30 years, which is what the reality is in Afghanistan.”

Gates told ABC’s “This Week” that the U.S. military had a “very positive” relationship with Karzai and called him “the embodiment of sovereignty for Afghanistan.”

“I think we frankly have to be sensitive in our own comments about President Karzai,” Gates said.

Earlier this month, after a series of comments by Karzai that rankled Washington, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs left open the possibility of a cancellation of Karzai’s planned May 12 meeting with President Barack Obama.

In remarks that U.S. officials now downplay as an effort to seek favor with his domestic audience, Karzai blamed foreigners for perpetrating election fraud in Afghanistan and accused Western governments of trying to weaken him.

Media reports also suggested that Karzai’s meeting with Obama last month had been tense, with the Afghan leader perceiving Obama’s comments about corruption as lecturing. The meeting took place during Obama’s first visit as president to Afghanistan.

In a decision that markedly increased his administration’s stakes in the outcome of the U.S. and NATO-led fight against the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan, Obama in December ordered the deployment of an extra 30,000 to Afghanistan.

The Obama administration has had an uneasy relationship with Karzai throughout Obama’s 15 months in office.

The White House began the effort to effort mend fences with Karzai last week when Obama sent a letter to the Afghan president thanking him for his hospitality during the visit and reiterating the importance of the partnership between Washington and Kabul.

White House National Security Adviser James Jones, who briefed reporters on the letter on Friday, brushed off Karzai’s earlier comments and said the Afghan leader “did not intend to create any damage to the relationship” with them.

On CBS, Gates said Karzai had been helpful in an operation to regain control of the southern city of Kandahar, Karzai’s hometown.

“He’s already made a couple of these trips to the Kandahar area with General (Stanley) McChrystal and so he is very much participating in setting the stage if you will for this next phase of the campaign,” Gates said. McChrystal is the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan.

(Additional reporting by Emily Kaiser; Editing by Jackie Frank)

U.S. seeks to heal rift with Karzai

(Reuters) – Top U.S. officials sought to repair Washington’s troubled relationship with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, calling him a reliable partner and pledging to treat him with greater sensitivity.

Barack Obama

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton both described Karzai as a constructive player in trying to stabilize Afghanistan and distanced themselves from people outside the administration who have described his behavior as erratic. Their comments were made in television interviews taped on Friday but aired on Sunday,

“Some of these outlandish claims that are being made and accusations that are being hurled are really unfortunate,” Clinton told CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

“This is a leader who is under enormous pressure,” she said. “And I wonder sometimes how anybody can cope with the kind of relentless stress that you face after having been in some military activity or war footing for 30 years, which is what the reality is in Afghanistan.”

Gates told ABC’s “This Week” that the U.S. military had a “very positive” relationship with Karzai and called him “the embodiment of sovereignty for Afghanistan.”

“I think we frankly have to be sensitive in our own comments about President Karzai,” Gates said.

Earlier this month, after a series of comments by Karzai that rankled Washington, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs left open the possibility of a cancellation of Karzai’s planned May 12 meeting with President Barack Obama.

In remarks that U.S. officials now downplay as an effort to seek favor with his domestic audience, Karzai blamed foreigners for perpetrating election fraud in Afghanistan and accused Western governments of trying to weaken him.

Media reports also suggested that Karzai’s meeting with Obama last month had been tense, with the Afghan leader perceiving Obama’s comments about corruption as lecturing. The meeting took place during Obama’s first visit as president to Afghanistan.

In a decision that markedly increased his administration’s stakes in the outcome of the U.S. and NATO-led fight against the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan, Obama in December ordered the deployment of an extra 30,000 to Afghanistan.

The Obama administration has had an uneasy relationship with Karzai throughout Obama’s 15 months in office.

The White House began the effort to effort mend fences with Karzai last week when Obama sent a letter to the Afghan president thanking him for his hospitality during the visit and reiterating the importance of the partnership between Washington and Kabul.

White House National Security Adviser James Jones, who briefed reporters on the letter on Friday, brushed off Karzai’s earlier comments and said the Afghan leader “did not intend to create any damage to the relationship” with them.

On CBS, Gates said Karzai had been helpful in an operation to regain control of the southern city of Kandahar, Karzai’s hometown.

“He’s already made a couple of these trips to the Kandahar area with General (Stanley) McChrystal and so he is very much participating in setting the stage if you will for this next phase of the campaign,” Gates said. McChrystal is the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan.

(Additional reporting by Emily Kaiser; Editing by Jackie Frank)

U.S. seeks to heal rift with Karzai

WASHINGTON, April 11 (Reuters) – Top U.S. officials sought to repair Washington’s troubled relationship with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, calling him a reliable partner and pledging to treat him with greater sensitivity.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton both described Karzai as a constructive player in trying to stabilize Afghanistan and distanced themselves from people outside the administration who have described his behavior as erratic. Their comments were made in television interviews taped on Friday but aired on Sunday,

“Some of these outlandish claims that are being made and accusations that are being hurled are really unfortunate,” Clinton told CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

“This is a leader who is under enormous pressure,” she said. “And I wonder sometimes how anybody can cope with the kind of relentless stress that you face after having been in some military activity or war footing for 30 years, which is what the reality is in Afghanistan.”

Gates told ABC’s “This Week” that the U.S. military had a “very positive” relationship with Karzai and called him “the embodiment of sovereignty for Afghanistan.”

“I think we frankly have to be sensitive in our own comments about President Karzai,” Gates said.

Earlier this month, after a series of comments by Karzai that rankled Washington, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs left open the possibility of a cancellation of Karzai’s planned May 12 meeting with President Barack Obama.

In remarks that U.S. officials now downplay as an effort to seek favor with his domestic audience, Karzai blamed foreigners for perpetrating election fraud in Afghanistan and accused Western governments of trying to weaken him.

Media reports also suggested that Karzai’s meeting with Obama last month had been tense, with the Afghan leader perceiving Obama’s comments about corruption as lecturing. The meeting took place during Obama’s first visit as president to Afghanistan.

In a decision that markedly increased his administration’s stakes in the outcome of the U.S. and NATO-led fight against the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan, Obama in December ordered the deployment of an extra 30,000 to Afghanistan.

The Obama administration has had an uneasy relationship with Karzai throughout Obama’s 15 months in office.

The White House began the effort to effort mend fences with Karzai last week when Obama sent a letter to the Afghan president thanking him for his hospitality during the visit and reiterating the importance of the partnership between Washington and Kabul.

White House National Security Adviser James Jones, who briefed reporters on the letter on Friday, brushed off Karzai’s earlier comments and said the Afghan leader “did not intend to create any damage to the relationship” with them.

On CBS, Gates said Karzai had been helpful in an operation to regain control of the southern city of Kandahar, Karzai’s hometown.(ID:nSGE639039])

“He’s already made a couple of these trips to the Kandahar area with General (Stanley) McChrystal and so he is very much participating in setting the stage if you will for this next phase of the campaign,” Gates said. McChrystal is the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan. (Additional reporting by Emily Kaiser; Editing by Jackie Frank)

US may still cancel Obama, Karzai Washington meeting

Washington, Apr.7 (ANI): The May 12 meeting between US President Barack Obama and his Afghan counterpart Hamid Karzai in Washington could still be cancelled, White House sources said Tuesday.

Obama has asked Karzai to crack down on internal corruption, and according to sources here, his administration is also unhappy with comments attacking the U.S. and its allies.

Over the last several days the White House has maintained that next month’s meeting wouldn’t be compromised as a result of Karzai’s remarks.

However, according to Fox News, in his daily briefing Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs changed his tone. “We certainly would evaluate whatever continued or further remarks President Karzai makes as to whether that’s constructive to have such a meeting.” (ANI)

Baghdad strike video tragic: White House

The White House has described a graphic leaked video of a US helicopter strike in Baghdad three years ago, which killed two Reuters employees and others, as “tragic”.

After the previously classified video was released by whistleblower website WikiLeaks, president Barack Obama’s spokesman Robert Gibbs stressed that US forces in war zones take pains to avoid civilian casualties.

The gun camera footage, posted on the internet, includes audio conversations between Apache helicopter gunship pilots and controllers in which they identify the men in a Baghdad street as armed insurgents and ask for permission to open fire.

“I do not know whether the president has seen the video that was released on the internet. Obviously, it is very graphic in nature and it’s extremely tragic,” Mr Gibbs said.

“Our military will take every precaution necessary to ensure the safety and security of civilians, and particularly those that report in those dangerous places on behalf of news organisations.”

Mr Gibbs referred all questions about investigations into the July 2007 incident to the Pentagon.

WikiLeaks said it had obtained the video “from a number of military whistleblowers” and decrypted it. It posted the video at collateralmurder.org.

The footage shows an aerial view of a number of men on a Baghdad street, including two later identified as Reuters employees Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh.

At least two individuals in the video appear to be carrying weapons but most are unarmed.

The Apache pilots also appear to mistake a camera carried by one of the Reuters employees as a rocket-propelled grenade launcher (RPG).

At one point, the pilots tell controllers they have spotted “five to six individuals with AK-47s” and ask for permission to “engage”.

The pilots open fire with the helicopter’s cannon after which one says there are a “bunch of bodies lying there”.

“Look at those dead bastards,” one says. Another replies: “Nice.”

Shortly after the initial shooting, a van pulls up to pick up the dead and wounded and is fired upon by the Apaches.

Two children in the van were injured and evacuated by US ground troops who arrived later on the scene.

A US military official did not dispute the authenticity of the video but said it “doesn’t give new information, it just gives footage”.

“We had insurgents and reporters in an area where US forces were about to be ambushed,” the official added.

“At the time we weren’t able to discern whether [the Reuters employees] were carrying cameras or weapons.”

Obama seeks market-based yuan; U.S. Congress impatient

The United States on Monday reiterated its call for China’s currency to be market-based, as lawmakers warned they would act if there was no movement from China on revaluing the yuan.

China’s policy of intervening in currency markets to keep the yuan from rising to boost exports has drawn the ire of American politicians, who face elections in November at a time when the U.S. unemployment rate is stubbornly stuck at nearly 10 percent.

“The president has spoken repeatedly and recently that China’s currency must be market-based,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters.

With China on holiday, there was no official response from Beijing to a weekend announcement that U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner would postpone a report due out on April 15 that could have branded China a “currency manipulator.”

A Chinese government economist said the U.S. decision to delay the contentious report “created some room for further consultations and negotiations.”

“But I don’t think there will be a yuan adjustment in the near-term. We need to to see whether China’s export recovery will be sustained and need to see whether companies can cope with a stronger yuan,” said Huo Jianguo, head of the Commerce Ministry’s think-thank.

A U.S. Senate Finance Committee aide said Committee Chairman Max Baucus was worried that delaying the currency decision “repeats the same failed approach to U.S.-China economic policy.”

“He will be watching China’s actions closely in the coming weeks and months to determine what legislative steps need to be taken to ensure that China’s currency practice does not harm America’s ranchers, farmers and workers,” the aide said.

American Iron and Steel Institute President and CEO Thomas Gibson voiced disappointment and accused Geithner of side-stepping his obligation under U.S. law.

“We cannot continue to give China and other governments a pass on this critical issue,” he said in a statement.

G20 AND BILATERAL TALKS

The U.S. decision to delay the currency report followed Thursday’s announcement that Chinese President Hu Jintao will attend a nuclear security meeting in Washington April 12-13.

The United States has sought Chinese diplomatic help in curbing nuclear proliferation in Iran and North Korea. Both Washington and Beijing have tried to keep bilateral tensions in check after U.S. arms sales to Taiwan and a dispute with Google over Internet freedoms made for a rocky start to 2010.

Declaring China a currency manipulator, which the Obama administration declined to do in the 2009 reports, would require Washington to enter into consultations with Beijing through the International Monetary Fund.

Geithner said he would use meetings of the Group of 20 and a U.S.-China “strategic dialogue” in Beijing in May to urge China to budge on the yuan. President Barack Obama, many U.S. lawmakers and several economists say the currency is kept artificially low to boost Chinese exports.

China’s yuan barely reacted in offshore forward Asian markets on Monday, apparently reflecting investor sentiment that the U.S. decision will not shift of the value of the yuan a year hence.

One-year NDFs, units which traders use to bet on the future value of a currency, moved from 6.645 per dollar to 6.639, which still implied an appreciation of about 2.8 percent in a year’s time. But markets in Hong Kong and Shanghai, the main centers for yuan trading, were closed for holidays.

Analysts have said Beijing, loathe to be seen as bending to foreign pressure, may feel freer to nudge up the yuan if Washington dims its spotlight on public demands.

CHINA BUYING SPREE

Scott Paul, head of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, said “pressure will only grow for real results out of the bilateral and multilateral discussions with China” and that threats of action were necessary.

“History shows us that China understands consequences better than it responds to quiet diplomacy,” he said in a statement calling on the U.S. Congress to take action.

The Baucus aide’s remarks followed warnings by other U.S. lawmakers who are crafting legislation that would apply duties on Chinese goods to offset the price advantage they say China’s exporters gain by selling in an artificially cheap currency.

A pause in public carping about the yuan “makes a lot of sense to calm things down a little before anger gets out of hand, but this will only be productive if there is a frank and open discussion about the problems facing the two countries,” said finance professor Michael Pettis of Peking University.

But Pettis, also a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said such talks will need to involve other big trade surplus countries like Japan and Germany and might not bring results as quickly as U.S. politicians expect.

“High unemployment in the U.S. will cause the currency issue to resurface very quickly. And without real progress on correcting the imbalances, and quickly, which I think is likely to be difficult, the anger will persist,” he said.

Several Chinese economists quoted in the overseas edition of the People’s Daily, the official newspaper of China’s ruling Communist Party, maintained that the yuan was not to blame for the U.S. trade deficit.

But Li Daokui, a member of the central bank’s monetary policy committee, said China could nonetheless buy more U.S. goods to ease pressure from the White House and Congress.

“China can increase purchases from (U.S.) states facing mass unemployment because of recession in the manufacturing sector,” said Li, a Harvard-trained economist at Tsinghua University in Beijing.

Beijing let the yuan rise 21 percent against the U.S. dollar between July 2005 and July 2008 before effectively repegging the currency, also called the renminbi, near 6.83 to the dollar to help the economy through the 2008-2009 financial crisis.

The United States’ deficit in trade with China fell to $227 billion in 2009 from a record $268 billion in 2008, largely the result of the global recession, but the Obama administration is keen to lift exports and employment.

(Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle, Doug Palmer, Matt Spetalnick in Washington and Kevin Yao Buckley in Beijing, editing by Philip Barbara)