Karzai to ask UN to trim Taliban blacklist -report

July 12 (Reuters) – Afghan President Hamid Karzai plans to ask the United Nations to remove as many as 50 former Taliban members from a U.N. blacklist, The Washington Post reported on Monday.

The request to remove about a quarter of the 137 names on the list is aimed at advancing reconciliation talks with insurgents, the report said, citing a senior Afghan official.

At least five of those named on the sanction list are former Taliban officials who now serve in parliament or privately mediate between the Afghan government and the insurgents battling NATO-led forces and their Afghan partners.

The senior Afghan official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said Karzai would request that 30 to 50 names be delisted to “remove all those Taliban who are not part of al-Qaeda and are not terrorists,” the Post reported.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, met with U.N. officials on Tuesday to press them to move forward on the delisting process, the Post reported, citing sources familiar with the talks in New York.

Holbrooke hopes to reach agreement on delisting some of the purportedly reformed Taliban members before an international conference this month in Kabul that is aimed at bolstering stability in Afghanistan, the article said.

U.N. Security Council Resolution 1267 freezes assets and limits travel of senior figures linked to the Taliban, as well as al Qaeda, but recent Afghan efforts to engage some insurgents in diplomacy have raised doubts about who should be on the list.

The United States opposes the delisting of some of the most violent Taliban fighters, including leader Mohammad Omar, the Post said.

Karzai’s office said last month that the United Nations had agreed to gradually delist Taliban figures provided they had “no links to al Qaeda or other terrorist groups.”

U.N. officials were demanding more evidence that they have renounced violence, embraced the new Afghan constitution and severed any links with the Taliban and al-Qaeda, The Washington Post said. (Reporting by JoAnne Allen; editing by Eric Beech)

U.S. says new sanctions on Iran could impact Pakistan

(Reuters) – Pakistan should be wary of committing to an Iran-Pakistan natural gas pipeline because anticipated U.S. sanctions on Iran could hit Pakistani companies, the U.S. special representative to the region said on Sunday. While sympathetic to Pakistan’s energy needs, the U.S. special representative to the region, Richard Holbrooke, told reporters that new legislation, which targets Iran’s energy sector, is being drafted in the U.S. Congress and that Pakistan should “wait and see.”

Politics

“Pakistan has an obvious, major energy problem and we are sympathetic to that, but in regards to a specific project, legislation is being prepared that may apply to the project,” he said, referring to the pipeline. “We caution the Pakistanis not to over-commit themselves until we know the legislation.” Pakistan is plagued by chronic electricity shortages that have led to mass demonstrations and battered the politically shaky government of President Asif Ali Zardari.

U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman said last week he expects Congress to finish shortly legislation tightening U.S. sanctions on Iran that will include provisions affecting the supply of refined petroleum products to Tehran, and add to sanctions on its financial sector.

Lieberman, an independent, is a member of a House-Senate committee of negotiators working on final details of the bill and said it could pass by July 4.

The $7.6 billion natural gas pipeline deal, signed in March, doesn’t directly deal with refined petroleum products and was hailed in both Iran and Pakistan as highly beneficial.

The U.S. has so far been muted in its criticism of the deal, balancing its need to support Pakistan, a vital but unstable ally in the global war against al Qaeda, with its desire to isolate Iran.

But the legislation could be comprehensive enough to have major implications for Pakistani companies, Holbrooke said.

“We caution Pakistan to wait and see what the legislation is.”

This was Holbrooke’s tenth trip to Pakistan since President Barack Obama appointed him special representative to the region. His visit followed a series of working groups this week that are part of the U.S.-Pakistan strategic dialogue, which both countries say will lay the groundwork for a new relationship.

Afghanistan was on the agenda in meetings with the Pakistani leadership, Holbrooke said, including talks on a Pakistani role in talks between the Afghan Taliban and the Kabul government.

But the United States would not support Pakistan pushing the Haqqani network, one of the strongest factions of the Afghan insurgency and mostly based in Pakistan’s North Waziristan, into talks with Kabul as Washington sees the group as intransigent, brutal and too tightly allied with al Qaeda.

The United States has said any groups wishing to lay down their weapons must renounced al Qaeda and agree to participate peacefully in the Afghan political process.

“It’s just hard to see that happening,” Holbrooke said of the Haqqani network.

Regardless of what happens in Afghanistan, he said, the United States would remain engaged with Pakistan.

“Pakistan matters in and of itself. Whatever happens in Afghanistan, the U.S. cannot turn away from Pakistan again,” he said. “We are not going to repeat the mistakes that occurred – at least not on our watch — of the last 20 years.”

US will not allow terrorist ‘safe havens’ in Pakistan: Obama

Washington, May 13 (IANS) US President Barack Obama has warned Pakistan that his administration would not allow ‘safe havens’ for militants in its tribal region bordering Afghanistan or let Osama bin Laden operate with impunity.

‘My bottom line is that we cannot allow Al Qaeda to operate,’ he said. ‘We cannot have those safe havens in that region,’ he said Wednesday at a joint White House news conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

‘I’m not going to allow Al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden to operate with impunity, planning attacks on the US homeland,’ he said, adding his envoy to the region, Richard Holbrooke, will convey his message to Islamabad.

‘We’re going to have to work both smartly and effectively, but with consistency in order to make sure that those safe havens don’t exist.’

Obama said he had appointed Holbrooke as a special envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan to give a new focus to dealings with terrorism.

‘I’ve sent over Richard Holbrooke – one of our top diplomats – to evaluate a regional approach,’ he said. ‘We are going to need more effective coordination of our military efforts with diplomatic efforts, with development efforts, with more effective coordination with our allies in order for us to be successful.’

Obama said he had no schedule for the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan.

‘I do not have yet a timetable for how long that’s going to take…’

US carefully reviewing China plan to build N-plants in Pak

The United States has said that it is carefully reviewing the Chinese decision to build two nuclear power plants in Pakistan and asked the atomic power countries to honour their non-proliferation commitments.

“I think this is something that is still under discussion among all of us. Obviously it’s important from our perspective that all countries live up to their commitments,” US Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg said at the Brookings Institute – a Washington-based think tank.

Despite reservations from the members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), the China Nuclear Corporation has agreed to finance two additional civilian reactors in Pakistan.

“The Chinese have argued that it’s grandfathered. This is something that we haven’t I think reached a final conclusion on. But it’s something we’re obviously looking at very carefully,” Steinberg said in response to a question.

“I think it’s important to scrupulously honour these nonproliferation commitments. So we’ll want to continue to engage on the question, about whether this is permitted under the understandings of the IAEA,” Steinberg said.

The top State Department official said the United States has intensified its discussion with China on its role in South Asia, Afghanistan and Pakistan in particular.

While Special US Representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan Richard Holbrooke has been to Beijing several times, Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Robert Blake held US-China Strategic Sub-Dialogue on South Asia early this month.

“We have had an intensified conversation with China on these issues. Ambassador Holbrooke has been to Beijing several times. We’ve had conversations both in Beijing and elsewhere. The Chinese have participated in a number of the multilateral

meetings involving Afghanistan. And I think our objectives are largely coincident in Afghanistan,” he said.

“I think we all seek a stable Afghanistan that’s has an inclusive government that’s responsive to its people; and a particular concern to both of us, that it does not harbour violent extremists that can pose a threat to the United States, Afghanistan’s neighbours and the international community as a whole. So I think that the basic framework within which we approach these things does have a shared set of interests,” Steinberg said.

Welcoming Chinese economic investment in Afghanistan, the US official said creating jobs and economic opportunity is part of a long-term strategy for creating a stable Afghanistan, creating alternatives to illicit production of narcotics and other sources of income for the Afghan people.

Hillary did not warn Pak of ‘severe consequences’: US

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did not warn Islamabad of “severe consequences” if a terrorist attack inside the US were to be have its foot print in Pakistan, two top officials of the State Department have said.

“I don’t think she said that,” Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs P.J. Crowley told reporters when asked about such a statement given by Clinton in an interview to the CBS news on Sunday.

“I think she (Clinton) was responding to a hypothetical question that the United States, would take seriously any link to a foreign country where there are successful terrorist attacks. She’s not singling out any one country in particular,” Crowley asserted.

U.S. Special Representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan Richard Holbrooke, while addressing the media at Washington Foreign Press Centre, said that CBS edited the interview and did not show the entire portion of its interview with Clinton.

“As a result, the quotes appeared to be different than what the Secretary of State actually meant.”

Holbrooke also said US aid to Pakistan would be impacted as a result of recent developments; consequent of the investigations according to which Pakistani Taliban was responsible for the failed Times Square bombing attempt.

“She herself praised the Pakistan government for what it has done. And so, I urge you not to react to a misrepresentation of what she said, although I think that happens from time to time,” Holbrooke said asking journalists to get in touch with the State Department spokesman for full unedited transcripts of the interview.

According to an as-aired transcript of the interview released by the State Department, Clinton was asked: “Even in light of the Times Square bomber, you are comfortable with the cooperation you’re getting from the Pakistani Government?”

Clinton answered: “Well, no, I didn’t say that. I said that we’ve gotten more cooperation and it’s been a real sea change in the commitment we’ve seen from the Pakistani Government. We want more. We expect more. We’ve made it very clear that if, heaven forbid, an attack like this that we can trace back to Pakistan was to have been successful, there would be very severe consequences.”

Observing that Clinton’s quotes were not been taken in proper context, Holbrooke said: “I think that perhaps it was not fully understood for what she was saying by some people who didn’t see the full text or didn’t appreciate what she was saying. And of course, it was an edited interview.”

Meanwhile, a top Pentagon General strongly denied that he had ever told General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani that Pakistan was not being tough with the terrorists.

“Yes, there was an unfortunate news story that came out that was completely inaccurate that represented that I had expressed to General Kayani US policy on doing more, and that just didn’t happen. It was a one-on-one meeting and it did not occur. And I’d made it clear to General Kayani that I did not represent it that way,” General Stanley McChrystal, US and NATO Commander in Afghanistan told reporters at White House.

“I think that it is important that we understand that the insurgency faced by Pakistan, the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), is an essential threat. I mean, it’s a significant threat to their country. And it’s complimentary to what Afghanistan faces. So it puts the two nations with a common problem,” he said.

“The Afghan Taliban and TTP are distinct, but they are not completely unrelated, and therefore it’s important we sync our two campaigns together. And that’s why I spend a lot of time with General Kayani, who’s a good partner working that,” McChrystal said.

‘Satisfied’ US now says Clinton’s Pak diatribe ‘misconstrued’ by media

Washington, May 11 (ANI): After an initial outburst against Pakistan following the botched Times Square bombing plot, the United States is apparently trying to water down its tough stand, with officials saying that Washington is ‘satisfied’ with Islamabad’s cooperation in the probe into the bombing plot.

“We”re very satisfied by the cooperation we”re getting on this particular investigation thus far,” State Department spokesman Philip Crowley told media persons during a press conference.

Richard Holbrooke, President Obama’s Special Envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan, also appeared to be in a ‘damage control’ mode following Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s stern warning to Pakistan.

Speaking during the press conference, Holbrooke said clarified that Clinton’s remarks were “misconstrued”

Clinton had warned Pakistan of facing ‘severe consequences’ in case extremists from its soil succeeded in attacking America.

“We think our relations with Pakistan have improved greatly in the last year.
Clinton herself praised the Pakistan government for what it has done. And so I urge you to not to react to a misrepresentation of what she said,” The News quoted Holbrooke, as saying.

He said the Obama Administration is actually multiplying Pakistan’s civilian and military aid, being deeply concerned over attempt of terror attack on the US. (ANI)

US piling up pressure on Pak to act over botched Times Square bombing investigations

Washington, May 6 (ANI): The United States is piling up pressure on Pakistan to follow the leads being provided to it over the attempted Times Square bombing with substantial action.

In a series of meetings and telephonic conversations with the Pakistani leadership, the Obama Administration has made it very clear that Islamabad would have to act after ‘clear links’ were established with Pakistan in the failed bombing plot.

Addressing a press briefing here, Assistant Secretary of State Philip Crowley said Washington has been in constant touch with Islamabad regarding the investigations, and that it has specifically been told what it should do.

“The purpose of the meetings was to inform Pakistan that there are clear links to Pakistan and that we would fully expect them to do what they should do and what they have been doing. Whatever leads are generated here in the United States … we would fully expect Pakistan to follow up on,” Crowley said.

“Pakistan, as you are seeing, has already taken its own steps. I”ll defer to the Pakistani government to describe what it is doing,” he added.

Crowley said US Ambassador to Pakistan Anne Patterson had detailed meetings with President Asif Ali Zardari, Foreign Minister Shah Memmood Qureshi and also talked to Interior Minister Rehman Malik over the issue.

President Obama’s Special Envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke also had a telephonic conversation with Qureshi, The Dawn reports.

When asked whether the US was satisfied with the action initiated by Pakistan, Crowley said : “I think it’s more a matter of what we do from this point forward.”

Crowley also clarified that the White House has not given Islamabad any list of things it wanted it to concerning the botched bombing attempt, but added that Washington will make specific requests as the probe proceeds.

“I expect we will make specific requests of Pakistan in terms of cooperation,” he said.

Crowley said that the attempt to bomb Times Square had “international implications” and the United States expected Pakistan to help explore those implications. (ANI)

US working with India on Af-Pak: Petraeus

The US is trying to reverse the momentum of the Taiban in Afghanistan and has been working actively with India with regard to the situation in the Af-Pak region, a top American General has said.

“It (India) is not in the title (of Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke), but he has certainly had a lot of activity with our Indian partners,” General David Petraeus, Commander of the US Central Command, told Charlie Rose Show on the PBS.

Appreciative of the recent Pakistani military operation against the Taliban and al-Qaeda along the Pak-Afghan border, Petraeus said the US forces in Afghanistan are trying to regain the momentum in the country.

“It (Taliban) has been resurgent. It did indeed have the momentum. And what we’re trying to do now is reverse that moment and take back areas they have been able to take control of,” Petraeus said.

The American General said that defeat of the Taliban in Kandahar is very important for victory in the war against terrorism.

“It really is the birthplace of the Taliban. It is also where the 9/11 attacks were originally conceived. That’s where they were planned. So it has enormous importance to the Taliban,” he said.

“It will not be a hub-to-hub offensive. This is not going to be something like the clearance of Ramadi or, say, southwestern Baghdad. This in fact is as much political as it is military,” he said.

Responding to a question on Pakistan, Petraeus said there has indeed been considerable progress by the Pakistani army and frontier corps against the Pakistani Taliban in the country’s northwest, including Swat and tribal areas, but clearly it is a very tough work.

“And again, the extremists there, the Pakistani Taliban and their confederates, have sought to fight back by doing what they do, which is carry out acts of indiscriminate violence against innocent civilians as they did before, as well, as they assassinated Benazir Bhutto and blew up visiting cricket teams and thousands and thousands of innocent Pakistani civilians and security force members,” he said.

U.S. envoy Holbrooke to have heart treatment

U.S. special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, will have a heart procedure later this week due to possible clogged arteries, his office said on Tuesday.

The veteran diplomat will travel to New York on Thursday for an angiogram and further treatment for his condition.

He had been set to travel to the region in the coming days along with other senior U.S. officials but will no longer accompany them on that trip.

(Reporting by Sue Pleming; editing by Mohammad Zargham)

US rejects Pak’s request to mediate on Kashmir issue

Washington, Mar.24 (ANI): The United States has rejected Pakistan’s request to assist it in restarting the stalled composite talks with India to address long pending issues, including Kashmir.

Responding to queries during a joint press conference with Pakistan’s Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir, President Obama’s Special Envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke said issues concerning India and Pakistan should be resolved bilaterally.

Holbrooke said the White House does not see a role for it in resolving issues between the two neighbouring countries unless they (India and Pakistan) want it to mediate.

He parried questions over Kashmir, saying he is not mandated to speak on the topic.

Holbrooke , however, said Washington would continue to encourage both New Delhi and Islamabad to talk to each other on all issues.

Commenting on the first strategic dialogue between Pakistan and the US, Holbrooke said the dialogue between the two countries would be an important milestone in strengthening the relationship between both nations. (ANI)

Strategic dialogue to mark intensification of Pak-US partnership: Holbrooke

Washington, Mar. 22 (ANI): US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke has said that the Pak-US strategic dialogue on Wednesday would “mark a major intensification of our partnership.”

“This is a partnership that goes far beyond security, but security is an important part of it,” the Daily Times quoted Holbrooke, as saying.

“The US is supporting Pakistan as it seeks to strengthen democratic institutions, as it seeks to foster more economic development, expand opportunities, deal with its energy and water problems, and defeat the extremist groups who threaten both Pakistan’s security and stability in the larger region, and American national security as well,” he added.

Holbrooke said the talks led by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi would also touch upon the Kerry Lugar Bill.

“We have to have the money appropriated. We are looking for every way to accelerate the obligations and the disbursement. We do not think that the money is moving as fast as we’d like it to,” Holbrooke said.

Meanwhile, Qureshi has reached Washington for the dialogue. (ANI)

US is ‘doing more’, and will ‘announce more’ for Pak: Holbrooke

Lahore, Mar.20 (ANI): Responding to Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s statement that it was now America’s turn ‘to do more’ to help Islamabad tackle the menace of terrorism more effectively, President Obama’s Special Envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, has said the US is already ‘doing more’ and will ‘announce more’ for Pakistan.

Briefing the US State Department, Holbrooke said the Obama Administration has been doing all that it could for the overall development of Pakistan.

“We are doing more, we will announce more, we want to do as much as the Congress will support, but Congress writes the cheques,” The Daily Times quoted Holbrooke, as saying.

Commenting on the upcoming strategic dialogue between Pakistan and the United States, scheduled to be held on March 24, Holbrooke said the deliberation “marks a major intensification in the relationship” between both countries.

He said the US would also discuss with the Pakistani delegation, which would be headed by Qureshi, issues related to the distribution of water and power.

“Beyond the strategic broad-range discussions, we want to move into operational things like water, energy,” he said. (ANI)

Pakistan Army not interested in politics: Holbrooke

Lahore, Mar. 15 (ANI): US President Barack Obama’s Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, has said that the Pakistan Army is no longer interested in playing a role in the country’s volatile political scene.

The Daily Times quoted him as saying that while Pakistan’s political scenario is still complicated, the overall situation has improved compared to the previous year.

He pointed out that there has been a significant improvement in Pak-US relations in the last 13 months.

“In the last 13 months, since this administration took over [in the US], there has been a significant improvement across the board in the relationship between our government and the government of Pakistan,” Holbrooke said.

In an interview with CNN, Holbrooke said that al Qaeda’s top 10 to 12 key leaders were killed last year, and the loss of frontline leadership had put al Qaeda under tremendous pressure.

“Al Qaeda is under great pressure after losing key members of its leadership,” Holbrooke said, adding that the arrest of Mullah Baradar, al Qaeda’s military leader in Afghanistan, as a significant development.

Holbrooke also said the distinction between Afghan and Pakistan Taliban is eroding.

“It has allowed Pakistan to take a much more forward-leaning position. There was above all a backlash from the excesses of the Taliban in Swat, South Waziristan, and their attacks in places like Lahore, Rawalpindi, Islamabad and Karachi have all contributed to an evolution,” he said.

When asked whether Pakistan would launch an operation against the Afghan Taliban, suspected to be hiding in North Waziristan, Holbrooke said it was up to the Pakistanis to decide. (ANI)

Holbrooke regrets callous comment on Kabul attack on Indians

WASHINGTON: A top American official on Thursday reeled back his remarks about a terrorist attack on Indians in Kabul that New Delhi found callous and offensive, providing a brief respite from growing US support for Pakistani interests in the region.

Richard Holbrooke, the Obama administration’s Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, had caused dismay and anger in India earlier this week by suggesting that Indians were not the target of the terrorist attack in Kabul and there were ”other foreigners, non-Indian foreigners,” who were also victims. ”Let’s not jump to conclusions,” Holbrooke advised about an attack that Indian and Afghan officials said had Pakistani fingerprints.

Holbrooke’s assertion came even as Afghan intelligence officials said the terrorists, speaking Urdu, specifically sought out Indians after attacking a facility that was known to house Indians. Other US officials too initially subscribed to the theory that the attack was a broader Taliban strike against foreign interests even though six of the 16 victims were Indians.

The latest strike followed two massive attacks in preceding years against the Indian Embassy in Kabul by the Haqqani group backed by the Pakistani military-intelligence establishment, according to US accounts.

But in a hair-splitting turnaround, Holbrooke said he regretted any misunderstanding caused by his comments. ”I did not say Indians were not the target, but that initially it looked like the target was not an official Indian facility,” he said in a statement, adding, ”Early reports on events like this are often unreliable, and I try not to jump to conclusions.”

”We all know that Indian citizens have and continue to be targeted by terrorists, including inside Afghanistan. My heart goes out to the families of all of the victims,” Holbrooke, whose senior advisor for communications is an Indian-American official named Vikram Singh, added in a statement evidently aimed at placating New Delhi.

Holbrooke also richly endorsed the Indian role in Afghanistan, which Washington is loath to recognize publicly for fear of offending its ally Pakistan, which resents India’s growing clout in Afghanistan built on a foundation of development and democracy that contrasts sharply with Pakistan’s Talibanist outreach.

”The Afghan people and international community deeply appreciate the very substantial humanitarian and reconstruction assistance that India provides Afghanistan,” Holbrooke said in the statement. ”The willingness of India to take risks and make sacrifices to help Afghanistan is testament to India’s commitment global peace and prosperity and a vital part of the international commitment to Afghanistan’s future.”

But the sentiment did not exactly square with the current mood in Washington, where US officials have largely fallen in line with Pakistan’s argument that its interests in Afghanistan, built largely on its backing for the medieval, nihilistic forces of Taliban, needs to be recognized against India’s growing influence. The US also appears to have given up trying to persuade Pakistan that its own home-grown extremists, and not India, constitute an existential threat to it after Pakistan’s military leadership forcefully asserted that its India-centric policy will not change.

The Obama administration, especially its military mavens led by the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, is now back to fawning over the Pakistani military, after briefly trying to get the country civilian rulers to assert their primacy. In effect, Indian officials fear that Washington is backing the Pakistani assertion, which, shorn of spin and sophistry, amounts to continuing the use of terrorism to achieve it objectives.

Although the current administration began by emphasizing social sector aid to Islamabad, there have been a flurry of announcement in recent days of military goodies to Pakistan, including laser guided bombs and fighter jets, aimed at mollifying Rawalpindi, where the Pakistani military is headquartered.

On Thursday, the Pakistani media reported that the country’s navy will be acquiring a retiring US Navy frigate worth $ 78 million, ostensibly as a freebie. The State Department, meanwhile, has sought an additional $ 1.7 billion for Pakistan from Congress (besides the $ 1.5 billion annual dole under the Kerry-Lugar Bill) in the coming financial year.

All these matters will be on the table when India’s foreign secretary Nirupama Rao will visit Washington on March 14-15, just ahead of President Obama’s departure for Indonesia and Australia. The discussions will also include Obama’s proposed visit to India later this summer, an engagement that is now weighed down by Washington’s Af-Pak policy that New Delhi sees as inconsistent.

Richard Holbrooke debunks talk of US mediation on Kashmir

WASHINGTON: Without uttering the “K” word, a senior US diplomat has debunked suggestions that Washington should help India and Pakistan resolve the Kashmir issue as part of a regional approach to end the Afghan war.

“Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India… share a common strategic space,” Richard Holbrooke, US special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, told reporters on Tuesday.

“And in order to understand America’s policy and America’s policy dilemma, one has to understand that both India and Pakistan have legitimate security interests in the region.”

“And I’m not talking about that certain area between them which I’m not going to mention by name…because I am not going to get involved in that,” he said, carefully avoiding a reference to Kashmir so as not to step on India’s toes.

“And people who have advocated that are making a proposal which I believe runs counter to stability in Afghanistan. Afghanistan must be dealt with on its merits,” said Holbrooke, who has taken pains to stress time and again that India or Kashmir are nor part of his portfolio.

Stressing that Pakistan and India have a “complicated historic relationship” going back to partition in 1947 and before 1947 “which people must respect”, he said: “What happened then affects us today. But I need to stress that both countries have legitimate security interests (in Afghanistan).”

But as President Barack Obama, secretary of state Hillary Clinton and other US officials “have said repeatedly, there are many countries that have legitimate security interests in what happens in Afghanistan”.

Asked if the issue of handing over terrorists involved in 26/11 Mumbai attacks and other terrorist attacks had come up in his talks with India and Pakistan, Holbrooke said: “Well, of course both sides raise issues like that, but it will not serve any purpose for me to make public confidential discussions.”

“Our relations with both countries are good. We are improving relations with both countries,” he said, noting: “Both in New Delhi and in Islamabad, people come up to us and say, oh, you’re pro-the other country, you’re favouring one country over another.”

“That’s not true. We are focussed on the issues themselves and on generally good relations, and we seek to do everything we can to help Pakistan economically, which is, I think – which is my highest priority,” Holbrooke said. “And we work closely with India on a whole range of issues.”

Asked if Indians in Afghanistan could feel safe after the terror attack in Kabul last week that killed 16 people, including six Indians, Holbrooke said: “First of all, in regard to this attack, I don’t accept the fact that this was an attack on an Indian facility like the embassy.

“They were foreigners, non-Indian foreigners (were also) hurt. It was a soft target. And let’s not jump to conclusions,” he said. “I understand why everyone in Pakistan and everyone in India always focuses on the other. But please, let’ s not draw a conclusion for which there’s no proof.”

Holbrooke ‘agnostic’ over Pak’s sudden change of policy against Taliban

Washington, Mar.5 (ANI): Notwithstanding the recent surge in action against extremist commanders in Pakistan, President Obama’s Special Envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke has said he is “agnostic” about whether Islamabad has actually turned decisively against the Afghan Taliban.

In an interview to The Financial Times, Holbrooke said he is unable to judge whether Pakistan’s policy against the Afghan Taliban, which was created by Islamabad itself, has really changed.

“Everyone has asked the same question. How do you know? Have we turned a corner? I’m not prepared to make those judgments, and you’ll have to ask the Pakistanis that. I’m an agnostic at this point as to whether this was a policy change (by Islamabad) or a serendipitous collection of discreet events.”

Responding to a question regarding the arrest of Afghan Taliban’s second in-command Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar from Karachi, Holbrooke said he has “no problems” with the Lahore High Court’s denial to extradite the Taliban commander to Afghanistan.

When asked about President Obama’s proposed pull out from Afghanistan next year, he said the plan to start pulling out from the region from July 2011 would go as per the schedule.

“Some people have either wilfully or through ignorance misrepresented that as the withdrawal date. It’s the beginning of withdrawals at a pace and size [to be] determined by the situation,” Holbrooke said.

He also admitted that US and allied forces are facing a “daunting” task in Afghanistan and “it is much too early” to predict the outcome of the struggle.

“You can’t occupy every piece of terrain, so the real key is building and transferring control to the Afghan security forces. It’s much too early. I’m not ready to predict how it is going to turn out because it is a difficult challenge,” Holbrooke said. (ANI)

US-Pak relations complicated, but indispensable: Holbrooke

Washington, Sep 19(ANI): United States special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, has said that the US-Pakistan partnership is “complicated, but indispensable,” and reaffirmed the Obama administration’s support to Pakistan.

Holbrooke said this while quashing media reports, which had suggested that the US embassy in Islamabad was expanding in order to secretly house 1000 marines as some kind of a military footprint, The News reports.

He emphasised that the embassy was being enlarged to help relations between the two close allies, and said: “We are enlarging the embassy, because Pakistan is very important and our embassy is smaller than that of let’s say Colombia. We need to increase the size of the embassy in order to serve the policies (that befit) relations between the two nations, who have a complicated, but indispensable relationship and partnership.”

Holbrooke was speaking at an event to launch a Pashto broadcast service along Pakistan-Afghanistan border regions by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL).

He further said that the US was looking forward to contributing to Pakistan citizens by broadcasting in the local language.

“The key is Pakistanis themselves, and we will support them every way we can, in the media area as everywhere else. We are not going to set up American broadcasting stations, this is an open part of the international network (providing) the means of communication to the people of Pakistan,” Holbrooke said. (ANI)

Amity Business School holds fifth Global Leadership Summit|Business[New Delhi{New Delhi, Sep.19 (ANI): Amity Business School (ABS) on Saturday organized its fifth annual Global Leadership Summit with the theme “Businesses Beyond the Downturn”.

A number of corporate veterans, including D.K. Purwar, Executive Director, Gas Authority of India Ltd (GAIL), V K Sharma, CMD, National Fertilizers Ltd., Priti Mathur, Executive Director and Chief of Corporate Planning, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) and others attended the event.

‘Amity Leadership Awards for Corporate Excellence” were conferred on several corporate honchos for their contribution towards the growth and development of the country.

Corporate giants also used the event to discuss how to combat recession.

The summit provided students with the opportunity of rubbing shoulders with corporate giants, who shared their experiences.

” “Boom” and “downturn” are the two phases of economic cycle and after one phase other phase is bound to come. “Recession is a time of economic crisis; a time full of adversaries and throwing plenty of challenges. This phase has different meaning for different organizations; for some organizations recession is a blessing in disguise,” said Purwar.

Purwar also outlined how despite the recession, GAIL has been contributing to the development of the country with the help of its efficient management and their leadership.

V.K.Sharma said recession is unavoidable and an inevitable part of business.

Priti Mathur shared several ONGC strategies to combat the recession.

Honouring and acknowledging the unparallel and incomparable contribution of several corporate ” Amity Leadership Awards” were bestowed upon them during the Summit such as:-

‘Amity Leadership Award for Corporate Excellence in the Oil and Natural Gas Industry’

ONGC received the ‘Amity Leadership Award for Corporate Excellence in the healthcare Industry’, Stryker Global Technology Center received the ‘Amity Leadership Award for Excellence in Umbilical Cord Blood Banking’, Cryobanks International India received the ‘Amity Leadership Award for Excellence in the Oil and Gas Exploration and Production’ ,Cairn India Ltd. received the ‘Amity Leadership Award for Excellence in the Networking and Systems Integration’ Spanco Ltd.’Amity Leadership Awards for Corporate Excellence” were also conferred upon Hilton Hotels, Tata Teleservices Ltd, Koutons Retail India Ltd., MBD Group, Bharti Teletech Ltd., PVR Ltd. and many more

The second session on ” Leadership Challenges for CEO’s” focused on the major challenges faced by the CEOs and top management in dealing with strategic perspectives related to growth, customers, crisis and risk. (ANI)

Zardari rejects Obama’s AFPAK policy

Islamabad, Sep.10 (ANI): Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari on Thursday questioned the efficacy of President Barack Obama’s AFPAK policy that links US policy on Pakistan and Afghanistan to ending a Taliban insurgency in the region.

“Afghanistan and Pakistan are distinctly different countries and cannot be lumped together for any reason,” Zardari said in an interview with the Financial Times on the anniversary of his first year in office.

Pakistan, he said, is unwilling to be aligned in a joint policy framework with neighbouring Afghanistan.

Zardari and his senior officials draw a distinction between a Pakistan with functioning institutions, diversified economy and a powerful national army, and Afghanistan, a state shattered by decades of conflict and ethnic divisions.

Ending the Taliban insurgency raging on both sides of the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan is only likely to be achieved by concerted military action by NATO forces fighting in Helmand and Kandahar and Pakistan’s army in Waziristan and other tribal areas along the border.

Zardari said that President Obama’s Special Envoy to the region, Richard Holbrooke had brought a ‘unique focus on relations with Pakistan’ and acknowledged the emphasis President Obama had put on Pakistan’s economic and energy needs.

Zardari is scheduled to meet with President Obama and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown in New York later this month and is likely to air his concerns on AFPAK. He is also scheduled to meet US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Islamabad next month.

Zardari said that he would appeal for more financial assistance to Pakistan, which he says is essential to ending the menace of terrorism.

“Pakistan does not have the luxury of time. Given the severity of the internal security challenge the country is facing, it is critical that the economy is provided a strong stimulus as quickly as possible so that the maximum number of jobs are created in the shortest time,” he said.

“If international aid flows are delayed beyond the next few months, the country will be forced to cut development spending as well as the provision of critical social services. You can then imagine how big a setback that could be for the global war on terror,” he added. (ANI)

Western envoys expect run-off in Afghanistan election

Paris, Sep. 3 (ANI): Western envoys to Afghanistan have said that their respective governments should “be prepared for a run-off” in the Afghanistan presidential election if too many votes are ruled “irregular.”

If no candidate gets more than 50 percent of the vote, a run-off between the top two vote getters will be held. The latest results show that incumbent president Hamid Karzai has 47.3 percent of the vote with more than 60 percent of the ballots counted.

The meeting of German, French, British, UN, and US envoys to Afghanistan here was regarded as a show of unity and support in the midst of an Afghan mission seen as unpopular in Europe and dubbed by some US media as “Mr. Obama’s war.”

In European circles, the meeting was also seen as an effort to pressure Afghan President Karzai in the wake of some 1,000 complaints of ballot stuffing and fraud now under review, and to garner support for US efforts to target of irregular election behavior and corruption, the Christian Science Monitor reports.

Hosted by French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, the gathering also included British envoy Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, Germany’s Bernd Mutzelburg, US envoy Richard Holbrooke, Karl Eide of the UN, and 22 other representatives.

The Afghanistan Election Commission is now going through nearly 1,000 complaints, of which 600 have been addressed, the envoys said – predicting they would finish the process by September 17. (ANI)

Karzai slammed his karakuli cap on table during explosive meeting with Holbrooke

Lahore, Aug. 31 (ANI): During the recent ‘explosive’ meeting between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and US special envoy Richard Holbrooke, Karzai is reported to have whipped off his distinctive karakuli cap and slammed it onto the dinner table.

“For an Afghan man to do that, it’s a big gesture,” a local businessman was quoted. “It’s like throwing down the gauntlet,” the Daily Times quoted an Afghan businessman, as saying.

According to reports, Holbrooke suggested holding a second round run-off following reports of massive fraud during the recent presidential elections.

Sources said, Karzai reacted very angrily at Holbrooke’s suggestion and the meeting ended shortly afterwards.

“They were discussing different scenarios and one of them was the possibility of a run-off,” the paper quoted a Karzai insider as saying. “That’s when there was a misunderstanding. There were strong words from both men.”

The Obama administration has not hidden its “disdain” for Karzai for running a corrupt government, the Sunday Times had reported.

US officials had downplayed the row and said they believed “Karzai’s agents leaked a selective version of the meeting to make it look as if he was resisting US pressure to force him to hold a second round when he was already the winner”, the report added.

However, the spokeswoman for the US embassy in Kabul has denied of any such altercation.

She denied reports about Holbrooke storming out of the meeting, and also refused to divulge details of the meeting. (ANI)