Fewer US parents to cut back-to-school budget-poll

NEW YORK, July 27 (Reuters) – Fewer U.S. parents plan to cut their back-to-school budgets, but they will count on smartphones and social networking to find the best bargains during the second biggest shopping season of the year, according to a Deloitte survey released on Tuesday.

“Retailers may be encouraged that fewer consumers are planning to pare back this year, although they may find that shoppers continue to be deliberate in their purchases,” said Alison Paul, Deloitte’s retail sector leader in the United States.

In the online survey, 28 percent of 1,050 parents of school-age children said they were planning to spend more this year on back-to-school clothing and supplies, while 17 percent said they would spend less.

The survey showed that among households that expect to spend more, about 34 percent said their children needed more expensive items, such as computers, and more than 26 percent said school budget cuts meant parents needed to pay more for children’s items.

Back-to-school shopping trails only Christmas for the amount of money consumers spend in a season.

The survey was conducted between July 9 and 11, and has a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points.

This year, 58 percent of respondents said they would change the way they shop for back-to-school items by buying more items on sale or only items family members really needed.

Last year, 70 percent of the respondents said they expected to change the way they shopped because of the recession, down from 90 percent in 2008.

“The survey indicates that consumers’ recession-induced behaviors are beginning to wane as households seek to replenish certain items and worry less about the economy,” Paul said.

WHERE’S THE SALE?

Twenty-nine percent or 305 of the people surveyed said they planned to use mobile phones for price information, retailer advertisements and to find discounts and coupons.

An equal number of people said they would use social networking sites to find promotions, look at products, and read reviews and recommendations.

“Consumers are increasingly on the phone, online and on-the-go,” said Paul, adding that retailers using mobile applications, text alerts and video content may win an increased share of shoppers’ back-to-school budgets.

Discount stores were still the No. 1 shopping destination, with 89 percent of consumers surveyed saying they planned to shop at discount stores for back-to-school items.

According to the survey, 31 percent of consumers said they would shop at traditional department stores, up from 26 percent last year, and 23 percent cited specialty clothing stores, an increase of six percentage points over 2009.

After two consecutive years as the second most popular destination, dollar stores dropped to the third most popular destination behind office supply/technology stores. (Reporting by Dhanya Skariachan)

Are Brides at Work Good or Bad? TheKnot.com, WeddingChannel.com & ForbesWoman.com Unveil “Work & Wedding” Survey Results

Brides Believe Being Engaged and Married Has a Positive Impact at Job Interviews
and at Work.
Yet, 1 in 3 Brides Admit Their Job Performance Has Suffered as a Result of
Wedding Planning.

View Full Findings at TheKnot.com/WorkandWedding and ForbesWoman.com
NEW YORK–(Business Wire)–
TheKnot.com (www.theknot.com) and WeddingChannel.com (www.weddingchannel.com),
the top two wedding planning websites housing the largest online community of
brides, and ForbesWoman (www.forbeswoman.com), a website for career-minded
women, today revealed the results of a cobranded “Work & Wedding” survey. This
one-of-a-kind survey, promoted on ForbesWoman.com, TheKnot.com and
WeddingChannel.com during the peak wedding month of July, polled 1,000 working
brides on their personal experiences and opinions when it comes to juggling work
and wedding planning. This in-depth survey reveals how wedding planning affects
job performance and employee relations, as well as a bride`s perception of being
married and engaged in the workforce.

“Planning a wedding can oftentimes be a full-time job for brides, so it`s no
surprise they`re distracted at work,” says Carley Roney, editor in chief of
TheKnot.com. “However, our survey finds that nearly one in two brides say that
after the wedding, they become more competitive at work. This could be good news
for employers since these newlyweds are now completely refocused on work and
will work harder than ever to meet their financial goals as a couple.”

Highlights from TheKnot.com, WeddingChannel.com and ForbesWoman.com “Work &
Wedding” survey results include:

38% OF WORKING BRIDES THINK BEING MARRIED HAS A POSITIVE IMPACT ON HOW THEY`RE
PERCEIVED IN THE WORKPLACE. Interestingly enough, 29% of total respondents said
that wearing an engagement ring could have a positive impact during a job
interview.

WORKING BRIDES SPEND AN AVERAGE OF 10 HOURS A WEEK PLANNING THEIR WEDDING-NEARLY
30% OF WHICH IS DONE AT WORK. However, for 20% of working brides, more than half
of their wedding planning is done at work. 35% of working brides squeeze in
wedding planning around lunchtime and 41% do it pretty much whenever they can.

1 IN 3 WORKING BRIDES ADMIT WEDDING PLANNING HAS HAD A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THEIR
JOB PERFORMANCE. The majority of employers don`t seem to notice though, as only
15% of these brides say that someone at work has commented about it.

MORE THAN HALF OF WORKING BRIDES SAY MARRIED AND ENGAGED COWORKERS ARE MORE
SUPPORTIVE THAN SINGLE COWORKERS. Additionally, 15% of working brides say that
single coworkers in committed relationships seem to be jealous about their
upcoming nuptials.

“There’s no doubt about it-planning a wedding at work can be time-consuming and
challenging,” said ForbesWoman Reporter Meghan Casserly. “But, rather than
trying to hide their wedding planning from colleagues and managers, brides-to-be
should communicate openly about taking care of both priorities-work and
wedding.”

To see the Forbes.com article and more survey results, please visit
TheKnot.com/workandwedding and ForbesWoman.com. To receive a full copy of the
survey results, or to speak with an editor from TheKnot.com or ForbesWoman.com,
please contact Jacalyn Lee at Jacalyn@theknot.com or Debbie Weathers at
dweathers@forbes.com.

About TheKnot.com & WeddingChannel.com

TheKnot.com (www.theknot.com) and WeddingChannel.com (www.weddingchannel.com)
are the nation`s top two wedding planning websites housing the largest online
community of brides. Reaching millions of brides each year, TheKnot.com and
WeddingChannel.com offer comprehensive wedding planning content, expert Q&As, a
passionate online community, interactive wedding tools and a central location
for couples to manage their gift registries. TheKnot.com and WeddingChannel.com
are part of The Knot Inc. (NASDAQ: KNOT; http://www.theknot.com), the premier
media company devoted to weddings, pregnancy and everything in between,
providing young women with the trusted information, products and advice they
need to guide them through the most transformative events of their lives.

Forbes Media

Forbes Media encompasses Forbes and Forbes.com, the #1 business site on the Web
that reaches on average more than 18 million people monthly. The company
publishes Forbes and Forbes Asia, which together reach a worldwide audience of
more than 6 million readers. It also publishes ForbesLife and ForbesWoman
magazines, in addition to licensee editions in China, Croatia, India, Indonesia,
Israel, Korea, Latvia, Middle East, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia and
Turkey.

Other Forbes Media Web sites are: Investopedia.com; RealClearPolitics.com;
RealClearMarkets.com; RealClearSports.com; and the Forbes.com Business and
Finance Blog Network. Together with Forbes.com, these sites reach on average
nearly 40 million business decision makers each month.

Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available:

http://www.businesswire.com/cgi-bin/mmg.cgi?eid=6370733〈=en

The Knot Inc.
Jacalyn Lee, 212-219-8555 x1013
Public Relations Director
jacalyn@theknot.com
or
ForbesWoman.com
Debbie Weathers, 212-366-8868
dweathers@forbes.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

Quick Poll: How Important Is Facebook Privacy to You?

Facebook, which just recently reached 500 million members, has become a daily ritual for many of us. We give the site information about ourselves, about our likes and dislikes, and about the people we choose as friends. Over time, all of that data collects on Facebook’s servers. But Facebook, in many people’s view, has played fast and loose with our data, marking much of it as “public” and giving its app-developer and advertising partners access to some of it.

Facebook users surveyed for the 2010 American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) gave the site a score of just 64 on a user-satisfaction scale of 0 to 100; many of the respondents cited privacy and advertising as key concerns. Yet many people in the online-advertising business believe that such privacy concerns are overplayed, and are largely the creation of overzealous privacy groups and their friends in the media.

Who is right? Please take our three-question survey and tell us your opinions on social networking privacy. We’ll share the results of the poll in a future story.

US firms plan to hire; service sector lags -survey

July 19 (Reuters) – Plans by U.S. firms to increase payrolls over the next six months have risen to the highest level since January 2008, but some service sector companies still see layoffs, according to a survey released on Monday.

The survey by the National Association for Business Economics (NABE) also showed strong demand in the goods-producing sector, while service sector businesses reported a softening in their expansion rates.

The results echo recent trends in the U.S. economy. Although the services sector dominates the economy, the manufacturing sector has led the recovery. Layoffs in the services sector could further slow the recovery.

The survey showed that half of the 79 NABE members who took part expected to increase payrolls.

In the services sector, of the 28 respondents, 4 percent saw layoffs over the next six months, 36 percent planned to hire more workers, while 57 percent saw no change in payrolls.

“Only the services sector continues to anticipate layoffs,” the NABE said in a statement.

The survey was conducted from June 11-29.

After sturdy job gains early this year, the labor market lost strength in recent months, hurting consumer spending and helping to slow the pace of the recovery from the worst recession since the 1930s.

Still, the NABE noted that layoff and attrition activity declined to 14 percent of respondents from 28 percent a year ago.

In the second quarter, the percentage of respondents reporting increases in employment touched its highest level since the second quarter of 2007.

“Over the past two quarters the goods-producing sector has experienced a dramatic recovery in hiring trends,” the NABE said, noting that 42 percent of respondents in the sector reported increased hiring in the current survey, up from zero in January.

The survey also found that about a quarter of respondents’ companies had increased capital spending in the second quarter, with the finance, insurance and the services sector dominating. Transportation, utilities, information and communications sector respondents reported no increase in capital spending.

Industries reported a slowing in the demand growth rate during the second quarter, the survey showed.

Economists have revised down their forecasts for second-quarter gross domestic product growth, on expectations that economic growth slowed in the period.

“Demand growth, though slower in the aggregate than during the first quarter of the year, remained broad-based, with all four major industry sectors expanding for a second consecutive quarter,” the NABE said.

Strong demand was reported in the goods-producing sector, while the finance, insurance, and real estate sector accounted for the deceleration in overall industry demand.

About 59 percent of the firms believed Europe’s sovereign debt crisis would have no impact on them, while 35 percent worried they could be hurt. (Reporting by Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Leslie Adler)

Americans Don`t Expect a Return to Pre-recession Spending Levels, Lifestyles Until Mid-2013, According to AlixPartners Survey

Seven in 10 Feel the Same or Worse Economically Than a Year Ago
NEW YORK–(Business Wire)–
On average, Americans don`t expect their quality of life, including their
spending levels, to return to pre-recession levels until mid-2013, according to
the findings of a survey released today by AlixPartners LLP, the global
business-advisory firm. The poll also finds that seven in 10 Americans today
feel the same or worse about their personal economic situations than a year ago,
during the depths of the recession, and that 83% expect to spend the same or
less on non-essential purchases over the next 12 months, illustrating an ongoing
frugality that`s hampering prospects for a consumer-driven economic recovery.
The survey was conducted recently as a reprise of similar AlixPartners surveys
in 2009 — one in February and another in November.

According to the poll, Americans are also decidedly less optimistic about a
quick recovery in the economy at large than they were in 2009, another factor in
restrained spending. The majority of respondents, or 63%, now say that an
economic recovery won`t take place until 2012 or later, versus the 46% who felt
that way in November and 40% who picked that year or later in early 2009. The
proportion of Americans who now believe that a recovery will take place this
year or next: just 5% and 12%, respectively.

“When we polled Americans last November, they expected their personal spending
levels and lifestyles to be back to pre-recession levels by, on average,
November of 2012, but now they`re saying not till August of 2013,” said Fred
Crawford, CEO of AlixPartners. “Obviously, despite some modest movement forward
in the economy, individual Americans remain greatly concerned about their
personal economic situations. In the past, AlixPartners has talked about how
this could translate into a `new normal` environment for businesses of all types
that rely upon the American consumer: lower plateaus of consumer spending for
years to come, maybe for the foreseeable future. Today, it looks like this new
normal is already happening.”

Americans continue to say that their two top concerns are their own personal
debt levels and possible job loss. Some 20% of respondents in latest survey cite
the elimination of personal debt as their top concern, versus 13% who cite
potential job loss. The seven-percentage-point gap between the two top concerns
has widened since November, when 18% cited personal debt and 14% said job loss.

“The gap between the top two consumer concerns was just two percentage points in
February 2009, possibly illustrating some stabilization on the employment front
over the past 15 months,” said Crawford. “However, given the length of time that
most expect it will take before they see a personal economic recovery and the
urgency on the personal debt front, consumer spending likely will continue to
languish for some time.”

About the study

The AlixPartners survey was conducted May 24-26 among 1,000 U.S. adults. It was
a reprise of key questions asked in February 2009 and November 2009, in which
Americans said that, post-recession, they plan to save significantly more of
their total income and cut back on discretionary spending.

Americans were asked to provide feedback on current economic environment,
describe current spending patterns, and estimate how their saving/spending
habits will change post-recession.

The respondent group was representative of the U.S population across all key
demographics.

About AlixPartners

AlixPartners LLP is a global business-advisory firm offering comprehensive
services to improve corporate performance, execute corporate turnarounds, and
provide litigation consulting and forensic accounting services. The firm has
more than 900 professionals in 14 offices across North America, Europe and Asia.
The firm can be found on the Web at www.alixpartners.com.

AlixPartners LLP
Tim Yost, +1-248-204-8689
+1-248-227-1694 (m)
tyost@alixpartners.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

Investors Anticipate Recovery but Foresee an Extended Period of Below-Average Growth, According to Survey by the Boston

BOSTON, MA, Jul 14 (MARKET WIRE) —
Global investors are anticipating economic recovery — although opinions
vary widely as to when that recovery will be fully sustainable, according
to a recent survey conducted by The Boston Consulting Group. But no
matter when the recovery finally kicks in, there is a consensus that
developed economies face an extended period of below-average growth.

Investors’ Views on Economic Recovery and Growth

The BCG survey polled a broad cross section of U.S. and European
investment professionals responsible for more than $1 trillion in assets
under management. Among the key findings:

– Thirty percent of respondents said they expect a recovery (defined as
2.5 to 3 percent sustainable annual GDP growth in the world’s
developed economies) to happen by the end of 2010. And more than half
(55 percent) expect it to be in full gear by July 2011.

– However, investors and analysts covering European and other global
markets were considerably more pessimistic about when the recovery
will occur than those covering the United States. Nearly 40 percent of
the U.S.-focused respondents see developed economies reaching the 2.5
percent GDP growth threshold by the end of 2010 and 60 percent by July
2011. By contrast, the equivalent numbers for those respondents not
focused on U.S. markets are 19 percent and 50 percent, respectively.
And 31 percent of these respondents don’t see the recovery happening
until January 2013 — or later.

– Most respondents foresee an extended period when corporate earnings
growth will remain below the long-term historical average for
developed markets of approximately 5 percent. A plurality (46 percent)
estimate that annual net-income growth rates in the next few years
could be as low as 2 to 4 percent. Another 40 percent were slightly
more optimistic, seeing net-income growth in the neighborhood of 4 to
6 percent. Only 9 percent expect earnings growth to be 6 percent or
higher.

The Implications for Companies

Precisely because finding opportunities for growth will be more
difficult, investors are looking to invest in companies with credible
plans for profitable organic growth based on sustainable competitive
advantage. “As the recovery gathers steam, investors are becoming
relatively less concerned about a company’s liquidity and near-term
financial survival and more concerned about its ability to take advantage
of even a modest renewal in economic growth rates,” said Jeff Kotzen, a
senior partner in BCG’s New York office and a coauthor of the study.

But that doesn’t mean companies can pursue “growth for growth’s sake.”
Investors also want companies to deploy their capital prudently,
returning excess cash to investors once profitable growth has been
funded. What’s more, survey respondents generally prefer that cash in the
form of dividends rather than share repurchases for the simple reason
that most (76 percent) believe that companies do a poor job of timing
share buybacks.

“Alignment of a company’s business, financial, and investor strategies is
critical to attracting investors and managing their expectations,” said
Eric Olsen, a senior partner in BCG’s Chicago office and study coauthor.
Companies still have a long way to go to achieve that alignment. A full
67 percent of respondents said that the companies in which they invest
are either poorly or only partly aligned on these three dimensions.

An Action Plan

In addition to reporting on the survey findings, the BCG article
“Investors’ Priorities in the Postdownturn Economy” outlines four key
steps companies can take to respond to current investor sentiment.

– Revisit growth strategies. At a time when companies can no longer rely
on macroeconomic trends to fuel growth, it is critical to review
growth strategies and pursue only those that rest on a foundation of
competitive advantage.

– Reevaluate deployment of excess cash. After a period in which many
companies have been extremely conservative about protecting liquidity
by preserving cash on the balance sheet and paying down debt, they now
need to carefully develop the best plan for deploying that cash and
their ongoing free cash flow.

– Understand the key drivers of relative valuation multiples. Expansion
in a company’s valuation multiple will be an important contributor to
total shareholder return (TSR) in the years to come. BCG research
shows that it is possible to identify and actively manage the factors
that determine roughly 80 percent of the differences in valuation
multiples across a company’s peer group.

– Take a fresh look at the company’s investor base. Given the evolution
of investor priorities since the downturn, it is especially important
for a company to reengage with its investors and share an up-to-date
view on the company’s business strategy, competitive positioning, and
financial results.

To receive a copy of the article or arrange an interview with one of
the authors, please contact Eric Gregoire at +1 617 850 3783 or
gregoire.eric@bcg.com.

About The Boston Consulting Group

The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) is a global management consulting firm
and the world’s leading advisor on business strategy. We partner with
clients in all sectors and regions to identify their highest-value
opportunities, address their most critical challenges, and transform
their businesses. Our customized approach combines deep insight into the
dynamics of companies and markets with close collaboration at all levels
of the client organization. This ensures that our clients achieve
sustainable competitive advantage, build more capable organizations, and
secure lasting results. Founded in 1963, BCG is a private company with 69
offices in 40 countries. For more information, please visit www.bcg.com.

The Boston Consulting Group
Eric Gregoire
Global Media Relations Manager

Tel +1 617 850 3783
Fax +1 617 850 3701
gregoire.eric@bcg.com

Copyright 2010, Market Wire, All rights reserved.

The Truth About Sustainability Compensation

Sustainability or CSR professionals state that factors other than compensation are largely what drew them to the field; however, they still want to be compensated fairly. As a CSR recruiter, I work directly with hiring managers. It’s my experience that hiring managers want to compensate CSR professionals fairly. Yet, I have also found that neither job seekers nor hiring managers know what is fair.

Given that transparency is a tenet of CSR, it’s ironic that CSR salaries are not more transparent. The truth is that human resources policies, and salaries for that matter, still function on the traditional operating principles of the corporate sector.

In addition, CSR is still a relatively small and nascent field with scant salary information available. Worth noting is a well done 2010 survey conducted by U.K.-based Acre Resources [PDF], which had 595 respondents, of which 150 were based in North America. However, the report does not provide information specific to the United States, nor does it provide salary information by sector or job title. Also, a valuable new report is the just-released Profile of the Profession [PDF] from the Business Council on Climate Change (BCCC), which includes a gender-specific salary comparison, and is definitely worth checking out.

What is the Truth?

I’m hoping to shed light on CSR salaries with the purpose of helping hiring managers and employees benchmark what is fair. The source of this information is the hundreds of sustainability professionals I have interviewed during my searches. In the course of the recruitment process, these professionals disclose their salary.

While the information is anecdotal, I have observed consistency across so many candidates that I am confident that the salary information I share here is valid. As such, this article has useful information for both employers and employees.

Salaries Vary at the Surface; Dig Deeper for Enlightenment

Overall, salaries vary. The salary range that I have observed for sustainability professionals ranges from $48,000 to $500,000. Not too helpful.

However, this wide range narrows when one adjusts for key factors. After taking these into account, the salaries become much more consistent and predictable.

The key factors are:

* The employer (size, sector, industry)
* Job title
* Number of years post-graduation
* Number of years professional experience plus education
* Location (For example, NYC and San Francisco are among the most expensive cities and, therefore, one often finds higher salaries)
* Reporting relationship (number of direct reports and proximity in reporting relationship to CEO)
* The overall package (benefits, bonus, vacation, etc.)

In fact, when I take these factors into consideration, CSR salaries become so consistent that I am able to guess a candidate’s salary with amazing precision.

Next Page: What are the salaries?
!–pagebreak–

What, exactly, are the salaries?

Two of the most important factors are level of the position and experience. Clearly, these are also interrelated. Let’s take a look:

Heads of Sustainability / CSR: Based on my conversations with more than 30 Director-level CSR candidates, $150,000 is the average (mean) income for Director-level CSR positions. Most commonly, Director-level salaries fall in the range of $120K-$130K. A Vice President-level leader earns about $220,000. These positions can easily reach in the $300-$350K range for base salary.

Recent MBA graduates: Those with less work-related experience, such as recent MBA graduates, can expect to earn $100,000 plus or minus $20,000 for a CSR position.

The assumption that sustainability professionals earn less than other comparable positions is false if you hold all the factors listed above constant. I call this the ceteris paribus assumption, the Latin term for “all things being equal.” If you are a hiring manager wondering what salary to offer your new CSR hire, you don’t have to look far; rather, look at who this hire’s ” “near” colleagues will be.

A CSR professional is likely to earn a similar salary to those working in the same department for which sustainability falls. In other words, if the CSR Director sits within Public Affairs, their salary will be similar to their parallel level colleagues in Public Affairs.

To test the ceteris paribus assumption, let’s visit Salary.com. Note that while Salary.com publishes salary information for such seemingly obtuse titles as “Child Life Specialist, a keyword search for “sustainability” and “responsibility” return nothing at all. Salary.com estimates that a Director of Marketing based in San Francisco with an MBA will earn $147,000. This supports my finding, as discussed above, that other marketing salaries compare evenly with sustainability salaries.

Next Page: Three areas where CSR salaries fall short.
!–pagebreak–

CSR Salaries Don’t Always Measure Up

Still, despite the desire to be fair, CSR salaries are not all together fair. They fall short in three areas:

* Transferability
* Comparing to CSR professionals who fit in departments
* Start-ups

Transferability: Lack of internal upward mobility
Once the CSR professional gets her foot in the door and lands a job, eventually they will be concerned about their own career advancement. What comes next for a CSR Manager? Is it a CSR Director? Is there availability in your company for that role? Because the CSR department within any company tends to be relatively small, the employee has fewer options for professional advancement internally. Her non-CSR co-workers have greater flexibility and internal mobility options over time.

My experience leads me to conclude that CSR employees are more committed to sustainability than they are to their employer. This leaves the employee with fewer options with their company. They have fewer options to move within the company to other departments and are more likely to move to another employer. Taking that one step further to salaries, an employee with less room for advancement and mobility has equally fewer opportunities for salary increases that would accompany a promotion.

Comparisons to other departments within the same company
We have seen that a CSR professional’s salary is in line with that of other staff in the same department as CSR sits. But, CSR departments across companies are all over the org chart. Sometimes they fall under Supply Chain, sometimes Human Resources (HR), sometimes Public Affairs. This is where CSR salaries can fall short. For example, careers in human resources are notorious for low compensation. If a CSR position is based in the HR function, then it will likely fall short compared to a CSR department housed in another company’s legal department. Start-ups: Lack of resources
Where salaries clearly fall short is within start-up situations or amongst fledgling small businesses. The unfortunate reality is that some socially responsible businesses pay their hard-working staff unfair wages. Truth be told, the candidate does not have a lot of negotiating power. One would hope that the socially-responsible employer would compensate their employees fairly, but this is not always the case.

How Do the CSR Salaries at Your Company Measure Up?

Do they fall on the low end? This isn’t necessarily a negative. Low salaries can be good for the employee. A low salary increases the employee’s flexibility and security. She becomes more adept at changing jobs. Potential employers find it attractive when a candidate takes on a lot of responsibility with a relatively low salary. Also, in the time of layoffs, her job is more secure.

Do they fall on the high end? While high salaries sound like a favorable position, they are not all good for an employee. It is those with the high salaries that are more likely to be laid off. During a downsizing exercise, the firm will often let those earning high salaries go and then hire someone new at half the salary.

What Can You Do?

A good first step would be for all involved to be more transparent about salaries, just as the CSR field strives to be more transparent overall. As a hiring manager, benchmark other companies. As an employee, agree to share your salary with someone in a comparable role at a comparable company if they agree to do the same.

Secondly, consider the position in light of the factors identified above. A better understanding of these salaries will make both employees and employers feel they are being compensated fairly.

Number of Fleets Measuring Emissions Doubles in Two Years

According to the latest green fleet survey from PHH Arval, almost half of all corporate fleet managers are measuring their emissions, and encouraging emissions reductions through driver behavior change, despite the economic downturn.

The findings come from the company’s annual industry-wide survey of fleet managers on their environmental initiatives, which found that 49 percent of all fleets are now measuring their emissions, up from 28 percent in 2008.

Although cost of environmental initiatives continues to be a concern — 42 percent of respondents cited costs as a key barrier to greening their fleets — the economic downturn has slowed some of those initiatives. In this year’s survey 51 percent said the economy had no impact on their progress, while 20 percent said it had slowed them down.

But 28 percent said that the economy served as a spur to increase the speed of their green programs, and 29 percent of respondents have found cost savings as a direct result of reducing the emissions from their fleets.

Driver behavior has become one of the top ways that companies are focusing on improving fleet efficiency; as the chart below shows, 56 percent of companies say driver behavior is one strategy for cutting emissions.

Overall, the survey finds increased awareness in and action around environmental improvements for fleet managers, with a steady rise over the company’s 2009 and 2008 surveys.

The full white paper is available for download from www.phharval.com/greensurveyresults.

The New Era of Sustainability Calls for CEO Action, not Talk

The writing is on the wall for corporate sustainability efforts — both literally and figuratively. In the largest survey of CEOs on sustainability issues, 81 percent of global chief executives say their company’s green strategies are fully enmeshed in operations, and that the time to take action is now.

The study, conducted by Accenture in partnership with the United Nations Global Compact, polled 766 CEOs from a number of industries and based all over the world. The findings suggest that the corporate world is entering into an “Era of Sustainability” — 93 percent of responding CEOs said that sustainability issues will be critical to their firms’ successes in the next ten years.

In releasing the survey results, which are tied to the 10th anniversary of the founding of the Global Compact, Accenture found three driving forces for corporate sustainability efforts: Brand, trust and reputation. These three components were ranked as the biggest motivating factor by 72 percent of respondents, followed by potential cost reductions and revenue increases, personal motivation, customer demand, and employee engagement. The figure below shows the full rankings.

While pressure from governments and investors rank lowest on the list of motivating factors, the survey responses indicate three trends that are shaping corporate sustainability efforts:

1. The consumer is (or will be) king;
2. Importance of technology and innovation;
3. Collaboration is critical.

The latest survey follows on a similar study conducted in 2007, and finds significant growth in acceptance of sustainability’s importance in the corporate world. Nearly all — 96 percent — of the responding CEOs said that sustainability should be “fully embedded into the strategy and operations of a company,” up from 72 percent just three years ago. Similar growth occurred in how CEOs perceive the roles of boards and subsidiaries in addressing sustainability. The chart below has the full comparisons from the previous survey.

As sustainability issues become core to corporate operations, the report based on the survey’s findings identifies five areas where companies will need to take concentrated action to grow the green economy:

1. Actively shaping consumer and customer awareness, attitudes and needs.
2. Generating new knowledge, skills and mindsets for sustainable development.
3. Leading the creation of an investment environment more favorable to sustainable business.
4. Embedding new concepts of value and performance at the organizational and individual levels.
5. Creating a clearer and more positive regulatory environment for sustainability.

The report was released in tandem with a two-day summit taking place this week in New York City; although the Global Compact itself is based on 10 principles addressing human rights, labor standards and corruption as well as environmental issues, the upcoming summit is geared toward building a new era of sustainability leaders.

The full report from the survey conducted by Accenture and the U.N. Global Compact is available for download from GreenBiz.com; for more information on the research and the summit, visit Accenture’s website for the research.

A New Era of Sustainability

This survey of more than 750 CEOs conducted by Accenture and the U.N. Global Compact explores to what extent companies are embracing green issues and preparing for a future where sustainability is central to business.

The study was conducted in conjunction with the 10th anniversary of the founding of the Global Compact, Accenture found three driving forces for corporate sustainability efforts: Brand, trust and reputation. These three components were ranked as the biggest motivating factor by 72 percent of respondents, followed by potential cost reductions and revenue increases, personal motivation, customer demand, and employee engagement.

Findings indicate three trends that are shaping corporate sustainability efforts:

1. The consumer is (or will be) king;
2. Importance of technology and innovation;
3. Collaboration is critical.

The report also identifies five areas where companies will need to take concentrated action to grow the green economy:

1. Actively shaping consumer and customer awareness, attitudes and needs.
2. Generating new knowledge, skills and mindsets for sustainable development.
3. Leading the creation of an investment environment more favorable to sustainable business.
4. Embedding new concepts of value and performance at the organizational and individual levels.
5. Creating a clearer and more positive regulatory environment for sustainability.

Nordea (Finland): Finnish summer holiday budgets almost unchanged

Finns will spend nearly as much on their summer holidays as in 2009. The average holiday
budget for this year is 1,560 euros compared to 1,600 euros last year. People living in
the Greater Helsinki area will spend considerably more than, for example, those living
in eastern Finland.

The amount of money spent on holidays increases with age. The holiday budget of the
youngest respondents is a little over 1,000 euros, whereas 42 – 53-year-olds spend about
1,850 euros on their holidays. Residents in the Greater Helsinki area spend the most, ie
almost 2,000 euros, on their holidays compared to the holiday budget of 1,250 euros of
those living in eastern Finland. The holiday budget of people travelling to far-off
countries often exceeds 3,000 euros, whereas the budget of those spending their holiday
at home is around 750 euros.

Will plans be realised?

Nordea has examined holiday budgets and plans in the Nordic countries in a similar
manner for many years.

- By comparing holiday plans and the way people actually spent their holidays, we can
see that people plan to do more during the holidays. but as the holiday begins, these
plans are dropped. In practice this may mean that instead of a trip to a far-off
country, people stay in Europe, or Rome is changed to, say, Tallinn. The difference
between plans and reality seems to persist year after year, says Anu Numminen, Nordea’s
Private Economist.

Where will Finns be headed this year?

It is worthwhile to note the difference between plans and reality, also when examining
the holiday plans for this year. Based on the figures, more Finns than before intend to
travel not only in their home country but also in Europe. This may be a sign of
consumers’ growing confidence and improved financial situation.

- Compared to last year, it is noteworthy that those respondents who spent their
holidays at home last year will also do so this year more often than others. Those who
travelled in Finland last year are planning trips to the Baltic and Nordic countries or
elsewhere in Europe. Similarly, those who travelled in Europe last year plan to head
either to Europe or even further afield, says Anu Numminen.

The average holiday budget of families with children is 1,700 euros. Compared to adult
households, these families spend their holidays more often at home or travelling in
their home country or in the other Nordic countries. Especially families with 7 -
12-year-old children spend their holidays in Finland.

- In contrast, households with teenagers make longer trips in the Nordic and Baltic
countries and to Europe, says Anu Numminen.

How are the holidays financed?

Finns mainly finance their holidays with their salary income and holiday bonuses.
Savings and the credit facility of a credit card are more used for trips to Europe or
the rest of the world.

- A credit card is a convenient means of payment when travelling abroad if you remember
to take good care of your card and cover the keypad with your hand when you key in your
PIN to prevent others from seeing the code. You can also use your card to withdraw cash
from an ATM as necessary. If possible, you can even have two different credit cards in
case of technical problems. If, for example, Visa cards stop working due to a technical
failure, your MasterCard will probably work, and vice versa. You should also avoid
putting all your eggs in one basket. If you travel in a group, cards and cash should be
distributed between the different travellers and several bags and pockets. And all is
well if you remember to take the card-blocking number with you! says Anu Numminen.

The blocking number for credit cards when calling from abroad is +358 20 333, available
24/7.

In Finland Nordea interviewed 1064 persons in the age of 18-65 years. The survey was
carried out by Synovate during the first two weeks of May.

For further information:

Anu Numminen, Private Economist, +358 9 165 88218

Kati Tommiska, Chief Press Officer, +358 9 165 42320

In the Swim

MISSION, KS, Jun 07 (MARKET WIRE) —
(Family Features) When you head out to the pool or the beach, does your
swimsuit make you look and feel your best? If not, you’re not alone.

In fact, according to a recent survey of more than 1,000 women, conducted
by Lands’ End, eight out of ten women (83 percent) confessed to having
worn the wrong size swimsuit. The survey also found more than half of
respondents (54 percent) purchase swim bottoms in a size that is too big
hoping for more coverage, while a third (34 percent) have squeezed into a
suit that is too small because a larger size was not available.

“With so many advances in swimsuit design, high-performance fabrics and a
full range of available sizes, there is no reason why any woman should
experience muffin top or saggy bottoms,” said Suzanne Bryant, vice
president of design, Lands’ End.
To help you make a splash this summer,
Bryant offers these tips for finding the swimsuit that’s right for you.

Swimsuit Strategies

When it comes to finding the perfect-fitting swimsuit, the goal is to
accentuate the positives and minimize the anxiety zones.

Minimize or Enhance Waist and Tummy
Strategy: Define a waistline, create
some curves.
–Find great waist-defining details such as princess seams,
draping and shirring.
–Suits for this shape will feature a shirred
waist, lines and prints and special detailing that will help to define a
waistline.
–These same details draw attention to the waistline and can
create the illusion of a smaller middle.

Minimize Hips and Thighs
Strategy: Draw eyes up and away from hips.

–Triangle shapes should look for suits that slim the lower torso and
draw attention to the upper torso with shapely necklines, bust detailing
and shirring.
–Details to look for include: surplice or V-necklines,
empire-style waist, darker colors on bottom, patterns on top.

Enhance Bust Area
Strategy: Create a fuller-looking top half.
–Find
supportive built-in bras to offer support and bust enhancement.

–Flattering top styles include halter, v-neck, scoop neck and shirred
tops.

Minimize Bust Area
Strategy: Provide bust support with good coverage.

–Higher necks are a must when trying to minimize the bust.
–Look for
back straps and supportive bras built into swimsuits.
–Quality fabrics
will also aid in coverage and camouflage top areas.

Lengthen Legs
Strategy: Higher leg openings to create the illusion of
longer legs.
–Choosing a suit with a two-inch leg opening will
instantly lengthen legs.
–Side-tie bottoms are great for adjusting the
leg openings to a desired height.

Finally, Bryant says, “Do love your body — but don’t stress about your
suit. Get a good fit and balance your body proportions and you’ll feel
great in a swimsuit that complements your figure.”

Learn more about swimwear styles and see the latest flattering designs at
www.landsend.com.

How to Take Measurements

According to the Lands’ End survey, six out of ten women stated they have
never taken measurements to find the perfect swimsuit size — 43 percent
confessed they simply don’t know how.

“Taking measurements is the key to finding your size and ultimately
looking great on the beach,” said Bryant. “To easily find a flattering
swimsuit, it’s important to measure your body, then use sizing charts to
pair up your measurements with swimwear designed to flatter your body
shape.”

With the right measurements, it’s easy to find the perfect swimsuit size.
A common mistake is not positioning the measuring tape correctly when
taking measurements.
–Bust — With arms relaxed at the sides of the
body, measure the fullest part of the bust keeping the tape measure
parallel to the floor.
–Waist — Measure around the waist at the
narrowest point. Add a 1/2 inch for comfort.
–Hips — Stand with heels
together and measure around the fullest part of the hips, keeping the
tape measure parallel to the floor.
–Torso — Run a tape measure down
the back from where the shoulder meets the neck, through the legs and
back up the front. (In other words, make a loop.)

Sport the Right Support
Not only is it important to get the correct
measurements — it is a must to select the best bra support and coverage
for each body type to achieve the perfect swimsuit fit. Bras shape and
define, adding fullness to a small bust, support to a large bust.
Shelf:
A shelf bra offers light coverage and support. It’s constructed of a soft
liner with an elasticized bottom band to help the bra stay in place.

Soft Cup: A soft cup bra provides shape and support. Most suits with soft
cups provide extra modesty; some feature push-up pads to give your figure
a boost.
Underwire: An underwire bra provides bra-like support in cup
sizes up to DDD.
Mastectomy: A mastectomy bra is a soft cup bra
constructed for support, combined with a liner. The bra and liner hold
the prosthesis in place with a durable under-bra elastic band.

To see different swimwear bra styles, visit www.landsend.com.

Image Available: http://www2.marketwire.com/mw/frame_mw?attachid=1274580

Wendy MacDonald
wmacdonald@familyfeatures.com
1-888-824-3337 ext. 235

Copyright 2010, Market Wire, All rights reserved.

2010 e-tailing Group and PowerReviewsSocial Shopping Study Reveals Trends Shaping the Future of Ecommerce

Study Shows Customer Reviews are Foundational Element of Social Commerce
Strategy; Points to Evolving Importance of Facebook in Online Shopping
CHICAGO & SAN FRANCISCO–(Business Wire)–
The e-tailing group and PowerReviews today release the 2010 Social Shopping
Study`s final wave of findings. The study asked more than 1,000 consumers who
shop at least four times per year and spend $250 or more annually online how
social media impacts their buying decisions. The data clearly points to three
key social shopping trends that will shape the future of Ecommerce.

Trend #1: Consumers trust the basic social media tools — When asked which
community and social media tools have the greatest impact on buying behavior, 71
percent of respondents rated user-generated customer reviews as having the
highest “good to significant impact” on buying behavior, followed closely by Q&A
(57 percent) and community forums (47 percent). In addition, compared to 2007,
shoppers are reading more customer reviews to be confident judging a product,
with consumers reading 8 or more up 77 percent over 2007 and 16 or more up 140
percent.

Trend #2: Consumers seek a variety of voices — Further authenticating the
growing importance of social media in the online shopping process, the study
reveals that “friends” and like-minded consumers are more influential than
experts. When asked which online voices have the greatest influence on purchase
decisions, 55 percent cited Facebook “friends,” while another 55 percent noted
“people like you” (55 percent) as having the greatest impact. Experts (51
percent); brands (38 percent), retailers (35 percent) and influential bloggers
(26 percent) followed.

Trend #3: Facebook is the social platform with the greatest potential — While
the role of social media sites in the online shopping decision-making process is
still in its infancy, the study points to the growing importance of Facebook.
After basic social shopping tools – including reviews, Q&A and forums – Facebook
features show the most potential to impact buying behavior. 31 percent cite the
Facebook wall (friends talking about products) as having significant influence
over buying decisions, while another 25 percent note Facebook fan pages as most
powerful. What`s more, the viral force of Facebook is considerable, as nearly
half of respondents reported having upwards of 100 “friends,” while 42 percent
of respondents frequently read and/or update their Facebook pages.

“Consumers are clearly in control of their shopping experiences and these
findings provide valuable and practical lessons for retailers and brands to
engage and benefit from the social conversation,” said Pehr Luedtke, CEO of
PowerReviews. “Retailers and brands need to build the foundation for trust
through the most important social tools: reviews, Q&A, and forums. They need to
provide a collective voice by integrating a variety of perspectives, including
Facebook friends and `people like you.` And, as consumers` expectations continue
to rise, retailers and brands need to present the content in an easy-to-find and
easy-to-consume way.”

Last month PowerReviews and the e-tailing group revealed research around how
consumers are using social media to shop and interact with brands and retailers
online. The study found that people strongly prefer to do their own research
online versus speaking to a knowledgeable sales associate in-store. According to
respondents, online research is preferred for three reasons: its ability to save
time (79 percent report saving somewhat to much more time doing their own online
research), increase confidence (83 percent are somewhat to much more confident
about making a purchase decision when doing their own research) and provide
credible information (82 percent are somewhat or very satisfied with product
information available online).

“The findings of our social shopping study not only prove that people prefer to
do their researching online vs. in-store. The supporting data also shows us that
the retail industry and consumer expectations are at a fundamental and exciting
crossroads,” said Lauren Freedman, president of the e-tailing group. “The
ever-evolving importance of social is certain to grow exponentially from a
shopping perspective given that it`s still so early in the game.”

About the e-tailing group

The e-tailing group, inc. serves as the multi-channel merchant`s eye, bringing a
merchant`s sensibility to evolving the multi-channel shopping experience. A
Chicago-based consultancy, they provide practical strategic perspectives and
actionable merchandising solutions to merchants selling online as well as to
enabling technology firms. For more background about this research study or
additional information on the e-tailing group, inc. please contact Lauren
Freedman at LF@e-tailing.com or visit the e-tailing group website
www.e-tailing.com.

About PowerReviews

PowerReviews is the leading provider of customer reviews and social commerce
solutions to retailers and brands. The company’s innovative tag-based approach
to collecting, organizing, structuring and analyzing user-generated content
significantly boosts product sales and customer engagement. Recognized as the
customer reviews Solution Leader in the Internet Retailer Top 500 survey,
PowerReviews works with over 1000 retailers and brands on over 3000 websites,
including Staples, Drugstore.com, Gardener`s Supply, Diapers.com, Callaway and
Jockey. In addition to its Enterprise solution, PowerReviews offers an on-demand
solution for small- and medium-sized businesses called PowerReviews Express
(www.powerreviewsexpress.com). PowerReviews also operates the leading reviews
and recommendation site for consumers, Buzzillions.com (www.buzzillions.com).
PowerReviews blog is at www.blogs.powerreviews.com.

the e-tailing group
Lauren Freedman, 773-975-7280
President
lf@e-tailing.com
or
TidalWave PR for PowerReviews
Lisa Tarter, 415-203-2462
lisa@tidalwavepr.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

2010 e-tailing Group and PowerReviewsSocial Shopping Study Reveals Trends Shaping the Future of Ecommerce

Study Shows Customer Reviews are Foundational Element of Social Commerce
Strategy; Points to Evolving Importance of Facebook in Online Shopping
CHICAGO & SAN FRANCISCO–(Business Wire)–
The e-tailing group and PowerReviews today release the 2010 Social Shopping
Study`s final wave of findings. The study asked more than 1,000 consumers who
shop at least four times per year and spend $250 or more annually online how
social media impacts their buying decisions. The data clearly points to three
key social shopping trends that will shape the future of Ecommerce.

Trend #1: Consumers trust the basic social media tools — When asked which
community and social media tools have the greatest impact on buying behavior, 71
percent of respondents rated user-generated customer reviews as having the
highest “good to significant impact” on buying behavior, followed closely by Q&A
(57 percent) and community forums (47 percent). In addition, compared to 2007,
shoppers are reading more customer reviews to be confident judging a product,
with consumers reading 8 or more up 77 percent over 2007 and 16 or more up 140
percent.

Trend #2: Consumers seek a variety of voices — Further authenticating the
growing importance of social media in the online shopping process, the study
reveals that “friends” and like-minded consumers are more influential than
experts. When asked which online voices have the greatest influence on purchase
decisions, 55 percent cited Facebook “friends,” while another 55 percent noted
“people like you” (55 percent) as having the greatest impact. Experts (51
percent); brands (38 percent), retailers (35 percent) and influential bloggers
(26 percent) followed.

Trend #3: Facebook is the social platform with the greatest potential — While
the role of social media sites in the online shopping decision-making process is
still in its infancy, the study points to the growing importance of Facebook.
After basic social shopping tools – including reviews, Q&A and forums – Facebook
features show the most potential to impact buying behavior. 31 percent cite the
Facebook wall (friends talking about products) as having significant influence
over buying decisions, while another 25 percent note Facebook fan pages as most
powerful. What`s more, the viral force of Facebook is considerable, as nearly
half of respondents reported having upwards of 100 “friends,” while 42 percent
of respondents frequently read and/or update their Facebook pages.

“Consumers are clearly in control of their shopping experiences and these
findings provide valuable and practical lessons for retailers and brands to
engage and benefit from the social conversation,” said Pehr Luedtke, CEO of
PowerReviews. “Retailers and brands need to build the foundation for trust
through the most important social tools: reviews, Q&A, and forums. They need to
provide a collective voice by integrating a variety of perspectives, including
Facebook friends and `people like you.` And, as consumers` expectations continue
to rise, retailers and brands need to present the content in an easy-to-find and
easy-to-consume way.”

Last month PowerReviews and the e-tailing group revealed research around how
consumers are using social media to shop and interact with brands and retailers
online. The study found that people strongly prefer to do their own research
online versus speaking to a knowledgeable sales associate in-store. According to
respondents, online research is preferred for three reasons: its ability to save
time (79 percent report saving somewhat to much more time doing their own online
research), increase confidence (83 percent are somewhat to much more confident
about making a purchase decision when doing their own research) and provide
credible information (82 percent are somewhat or very satisfied with product
information available online).

“The findings of our social shopping study not only prove that people prefer to
do their researching online vs. in-store. The supporting data also shows us that
the retail industry and consumer expectations are at a fundamental and exciting
crossroads,” said Lauren Freedman, president of the e-tailing group. “The
ever-evolving importance of social is certain to grow exponentially from a
shopping perspective given that it`s still so early in the game.”

About the e-tailing group

The e-tailing group, inc. serves as the multi-channel merchant`s eye, bringing a
merchant`s sensibility to evolving the multi-channel shopping experience. A
Chicago-based consultancy, they provide practical strategic perspectives and
actionable merchandising solutions to merchants selling online as well as to
enabling technology firms. For more background about this research study or
additional information on the e-tailing group, inc. please contact Lauren
Freedman at LF@e-tailing.com or visit the e-tailing group website
www.e-tailing.com.

About PowerReviews

PowerReviews is the leading provider of customer reviews and social commerce
solutions to retailers and brands. The company’s innovative tag-based approach
to collecting, organizing, structuring and analyzing user-generated content
significantly boosts product sales and customer engagement. Recognized as the
customer reviews Solution Leader in the Internet Retailer Top 500 survey,
PowerReviews works with over 1000 retailers and brands on over 3000 websites,
including Staples, Drugstore.com, Gardener`s Supply, Diapers.com, Callaway and
Jockey. In addition to its Enterprise solution, PowerReviews offers an on-demand
solution for small- and medium-sized businesses called PowerReviews Express
(www.powerreviewsexpress.com). PowerReviews also operates the leading reviews
and recommendation site for consumers, Buzzillions.com (www.buzzillions.com).
PowerReviews blog is at www.blogs.powerreviews.com.

the e-tailing group
Lauren Freedman, 773-975-7280
President
lf@e-tailing.com
or
TidalWave PR for PowerReviews
Lisa Tarter, 415-203-2462
lisa@tidalwavepr.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

Mobile Developer`s Smartphone OS Preferences

iGR Finds iPhone OS Single Most Used Platform Among Developers
AUSTIN, Texas–(Business Wire)–
iGR, a market strategy consultancy focused on the wireless and mobile industry,
today announced the findings of a recent study on U.S.-based mobile developers.
The survey asked respondents a series of questions regarding the platforms for
which they currently develop and those for which they intend to develop in the
next 12 months. Other issues researched included which OEMs provided the best
support, the types of applications they were developing and which devices,
including tablets, they planned to support.

Fifty-three percent of the surveyed developers build applications for the Apple
iPhone OS. The next most popular platforms were RIM BlackBerry OS, Android and
Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.5. – this is a drastic shift from iGR`s 2009
developer study in which Windows Mobile was by far the most popular OS.
Developers generally develop for multiple platforms and are increasingly
developing for more. Respondents currently developed for 2.4 separate platforms,
a number that will increase to 3.4 over the next 12 months.

Apple`s iPhone OS also led in developers planning to develop in future, with
more than half of those not currently developing for the platform planning to in
the next 12 months. Google`s Android and BlackBerry OS were the next most
popular platforms that programmers were planning to start supporting.

When asked to indicate the five most important factors when choosing a mobile
platform, more than half of developers consider multi-touch to be important or
essential to application development, making a whole wealth of devices
inadequate by this standard.

“With each new feature and capability added to smartphone OSes, competition in
the space continues to heat up,” said Matthew Vartabedian, research vice
president of iGR. “Providing a solid developer experience and the ability for
developers to generate revenue and profits off of the platforms is a key aspect
of that competition.”

About iGR

iGR, formerly iGillottResearch Inc., is a market strategy consultancy focused on
the wireless and mobile communications industry. Founded by Iain Gillott, one of
the wireless industry’s leading analysts, we research and analyze the impact new
wireless and mobile technologies will have on the industry, on vendors’
competitive positioning, and on our clients’ strategic business plans.

A more complete profile of the company can be found at www.igr-inc.com.

iGR
Matthew Vartabedian, 708-387-0475
mattv@igr-inc.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

Mobile Developer`s Smartphone OS Preferences

iGR Finds iPhone OS Single Most Used Platform Among Developers
AUSTIN, Texas–(Business Wire)–
iGR, a market strategy consultancy focused on the wireless and mobile industry,
today announced the findings of a recent study on U.S.-based mobile developers.
The survey asked respondents a series of questions regarding the platforms for
which they currently develop and those for which they intend to develop in the
next 12 months. Other issues researched included which OEMs provided the best
support, the types of applications they were developing and which devices,
including tablets, they planned to support.

Fifty-three percent of the surveyed developers build applications for the Apple
iPhone OS. The next most popular platforms were RIM BlackBerry OS, Android and
Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.5. – this is a drastic shift from iGR`s 2009
developer study in which Windows Mobile was by far the most popular OS.
Developers generally develop for multiple platforms and are increasingly
developing for more. Respondents currently developed for 2.4 separate platforms,
a number that will increase to 3.4 over the next 12 months.

Apple`s iPhone OS also led in developers planning to develop in future, with
more than half of those not currently developing for the platform planning to in
the next 12 months. Google`s Android and BlackBerry OS were the next most
popular platforms that programmers were planning to start supporting.

When asked to indicate the five most important factors when choosing a mobile
platform, more than half of developers consider multi-touch to be important or
essential to application development, making a whole wealth of devices
inadequate by this standard.

“With each new feature and capability added to smartphone OSes, competition in
the space continues to heat up,” said Matthew Vartabedian, research vice
president of iGR. “Providing a solid developer experience and the ability for
developers to generate revenue and profits off of the platforms is a key aspect
of that competition.”

About iGR

iGR, formerly iGillottResearch Inc., is a market strategy consultancy focused on
the wireless and mobile communications industry. Founded by Iain Gillott, one of
the wireless industry’s leading analysts, we research and analyze the impact new
wireless and mobile technologies will have on the industry, on vendors’
competitive positioning, and on our clients’ strategic business plans.

A more complete profile of the company can be found at www.igr-inc.com.

iGR
Matthew Vartabedian, 708-387-0475
mattv@igr-inc.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

Canadians deeply divided over monarchy Vs president debate

Toronto, May 26 (ANI): Canadians are reportedly deeply divided about whether they want a monarch as head of state.

A survey conducted by Angus Reid in advance of next month’s visit by the Queen suggests that 33 per cent of Canadians are happy to have a king or queen, while 36 per cent would like an elected head of state.

According to the Globe and Mail, one in five respondents said they don’t care one way or the other.

Still, half of the Canadians surveyed said they support reopening Canada’s constitutional debate to discuss the possibility of replacing the Queen with someone who is elected. One third were opposed.

The poll also suggests that Canadians have three clear favourites in the Royal Family. They are Prince William, who was held in high regard by 70 per cent of respondents the Queen, who was admired by 69 per cent, and Prince Harry, who was given a thumbs up by 63 per cent despite his occasional brushes with controversy.

Prince Philip was given a favourable rating by 48 per cent of those surveyed, Prince Charles was approved by 40 per cent, Kate Middleton by 31 per cent and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, by 24 per cent. Two-in-five Canadians said they hold an unfavourable opinion of both Charles and Camilla.

The online survey of 1,005 randomly selected Angus Reid Forum panelists that was conducted May 17 to May 18 is expected to accurately reflect the views of all Canadians within 3.1 percentage points. (ANI

Patients have misconceptions, anxiety about anaesthesia

Washington, May 20 (ANI): Patients have misconceptions and high levels of anxiety about general anaesthesia, a new research has revealed.

Eight-five per cent of patients who were quizzed for a survey shortly after day surgery said they had been anxious about receiving a general anaesthetic.

Seventeen per cent of respondents said they were very or extremely anxious, 22 per cent said they were quite anxious, 46 per cent said they were a little anxious and 15 per cent experienced no anxiety at all.

Key concerns included dying while asleep, not waking up after surgery, waking up during surgery and anxiety while waiting to go into surgery or arriving at the theatre door.

Dr Mark Mitchell, senior lecturer in the Faculty of Health and Social Care at the University of Salford, the UK, said: “Our survey underlines the importance of patients receiving planned and timely information about anaesthesia, prior to the day of surgery, in order to limit their anxiety.

“This should include information about how anaesthesia is managed, the notion of carefully controlled and supervised anaesthesia and dispelling misconceptions associated with general anaesthesia.”

Patients scheduled for elective surgery in three day surgery units in England were invited to take part in the survey and 460 patients – a response rate of 37 per cent – completed the questionnaire within 24 to 48 hours of surgery.

The patients who took part were aged between 18 and 75, with an average age of 46, and 59 per cent were female.

The majority had undergone gynaecological, general, orthopaedic, urological and ear, nose and throat surgery.

Patients were asked to indicate their anxiety levels about 24 different issues. This showed that:

The top three concerns that made patients very anxious were the thought of not waking up (26 per cent), dying while asleep (25 per cent) and waking up during surgery (20 per cent).

When the researchers combined all the patients who were anxious, the top five concerns were: waiting for their turn in theatre (59 per cent), the thought of arriving at the theatre door (56 per cent), dying while asleep or not waking up afterwards (both 48 per cent) and waking up during surgery (46 per cent).

Forty-one per cent said that they didn”t like the thought of having to put their trust in strangers and 12 per cent felt very anxious about this.

Anxiety levels were lowest when it came to interactions with medical staff and the support of a partner or friend.

Thirty per cent felt very calm about the anaesthetist explaining the procedure, 28 per cent about the anaesthetist visiting and 17 per cent about the nurse explaining the procedure.

Twenty-six per cent felt very calm about having a friend or partner with them during recovery.

Dr Mitchell said: “Undergoing day surgery and general anaesthesia is very common.

“The development of less invasive techniques means that the surgical effects on the body are now markedly reduced and, as a direct consequence, the amount of physical nursing care required before and after surgery is also considerable reduced.

“However, while patients need less physical nursing care, our survey shows that more attention needs to be paid to the psychological aspects of their care.

“The formal and timely provision of information about the planned surgery – together with a patient-centred approach to the provision of information, such as pre-assessment clinics – are vital first steps.”

He added: “It is clear from our study that many patients do not know how the anaesthesia process works and that this has led to misconceptions about, for example, waking up during surgery. It is vital to tackle these misconceptions if we are to reduce patient anxiety before day surgery.”

The study has appeared in the May issue of the Journal of Advanced Nursing. (ANI)

Irregular medication use increases seniors’ chances of falling

Washington, May 20 (ANI): A new study says that older adults increase their chances of falling by not taking their medications as directed.

This new finding comes from a recent study of Boston-area residents over age 70, which found that those who sometimes neglected their medications experienced a 50 percent increased rate of falls compared with those who did not.

“Falls can now be added to the growing list of poor health outcomes associated with non-adherence to medication,” said lead author Sarah D. Berry, a research scientist with the Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife in Boston.

“Because non-adherence is common and easy to screen for, health care providers should discuss this subject with their patients,” she added.

Berry and her co-authors are the first investigators to study the association between falls and medication adherence. The team used data gathered from subjects in the Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly of Boston (MOBILIZE Boston) Study, a community-based cohort of seniors recruited for the purpose of studying novel risk factors for falls.

They examined responses from a total of 246 men and 408 women with an average age of 78. Between 2005 and 2008, 376 individuals in this group reported a total of 1,052 falls.

A participant was characterized as having low medication adherence if he or she answered yes to any of the following questions: Do you ever forget to take your medications? Are you careless at times about taking your medications? When you feel better do you sometimes stop taking your medications? Sometimes if you feel worse when taking your medication, do you stop taking it? High adherence was defined as a “no” answer to every question. In total, 48 percent of the respondents were classified as having low medication adherence.

Those in the low-adherence group experienced falls at an annual rate of 1.5 times that of the high adherence group. This association persisted after adjusting for other variables, including age, sex, cognitive function, and total number of medications.

The study has been published the latest edition of the Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences. (ANI)