Research and Markets: Emerging Opportunities in African Mobile Market: Focus on Tanzania

DUBLIN–(Business Wire)–
Research and Markets
(http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/e0474e/emerging_opportuni) has
announced the addition of the “Emerging Opportunities in African Mobile Market:
Focus on Tanzania” report to their offering.

Since the liberalization in 2001, Tanzania has witnessed an exponential growth
in its telecom sector. The regulatory system also remains committed to expanding
network coverage in rural areas and plans to provide every village with
communications systems by 2020 end. The country’s mobile sector has seen huge
growth and expansion in the past decade with the number of mobile subscribers
increasing from around 3 Million by 2001 end to over 17 Million by 2009 end.

Emerging Opportunities in African Mobile Market Focus on Tanzania provides a
deep insight into the trends that are currently prevailing in the country’s
telecom market and also substantiates the data with necessary statistics. The
report provides industry forecast on country’s mobile market based on feasible
telecom industry environment in Tanzania including mobile subscribers and
penetration and mobile subscribers by operators.

The research also provides in-depth analysis on the forces that are fueling the
growth in the Tanzanian telecom sector. The report also gives an overview of the
competitive landscape, in which leading industry players have been covered along
with their marketing strategies and strength and weakness analysis.

It takes approximately 3 days to deliver this report

Key Topics Covered:

1 Research Methodology

2 African Mobile Industry Snapshot

3 Tanzania Mobile Market: Outlook 2013

3.1 By Subscribers

3.2 By Operators

4 Growth Drivers

4.1 Continuous Economic growth

4.2 Government Initiatives

4.3 Stable Regulatory Environment

4.4 Intense Competition

5 Key Players Analysis

5.1 Vodacom

5.2 TIGO

5.3 CELTEL

5.4 ZANTEL

Companies Mentioned:

* Vodacom
* TIGO
* CELTEL
* ZANTEL

For more information visit

http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/e0474e/emerging_opportuni

Research and Markets
Laura Wood, Senior Manager
press@researchandmarkets.com
U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907
Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

Copyright Business Wire 2010

Geithner says reforms will benefit Wall Street

WASHINGTON, April 25 (Reuters) – U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Sunday that proposals to more tightly regulate the financial sector are not a threat and will ultimately be a benefit to banks by making them more credible.

Regulatory News | Funds News | ETFs News

Interviewed on CNN’s “GPS” program, Geithner said the financial crisis had exposed the degree to which banks had strayed from their traditional mission of channeling Americans’ savings into growing businesses.

When trouble developed because of excessive risk-taking, customers suddenly went from “banks falling all over themselves to lend them money at unrealistic rates, to credit drying up in a heartbeat,” he noted.

“That system didn’t work so good for our country,” Geithner said. “That’s why I think these reforms are not just so important for future growth, but they’ll be better for the overall public interest and (for) having a strong, stable institution.”

He acknowledged there was staunch opposition from some firms on Wall Street that fear some of their trading and other activities might be curbed, but said it will not stop the reform drive.

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a package of financial reform proposals late last year and the Senate is due to vote on Monday whether to start working on its own sweeping set of proposals this week.

Geithner said the fact that so many firms had to be bailed out at taxpayers’ expense demonstrates the flaws of the current regulatory system and underlined why it had to be changed.

“We’re not going to support a bill that is weakened by big exemptions that leave this system in place, because that would be irresponsible for the country,” Geithner said. (Reporting by Glenn Somerville; Editing by Maureen Bavdek)

Obama confirms 24-hour flying visit

The White House says US President Barack Obama is pushing ahead with his trip to Asia and Australia because the area is fundamental to America’s economic and security interests.

The trip will be shorter than first planned, with the president spending little more than 24 hours in Australia, and only visiting Canberra.

The White House has revealed the details and expectations for the visit, suggesting climate change, trade and terrorism will all be on the agenda.

Some were wondering if this trip would go ahead at all, after being delayed and condensed so the president could try to win support for his domestic health reforms.

But the White House says the president considers it critical that he builds on the partnerships in the Asia-Pacific region, suggesting it is an area that has been neglected.

In a phone briefing for reporters, National Security Council chief of staff Denis McDonough described Australia and Indonesia as essential partners.

“The Asia-Pacific region is fundamental to the economic and security interests of the United States in the 21st century,” he said.

“And in order to effectively advance those interests, we need to deepen and broaden our engagement in our leadership in the region, which is why we have taken a more aggressive role in engaging groups like APEC and ASEAN.”

The National Security Council’s director for Asian affairs, Jeff Bader, says China is bound to be discussed because the US and Australia share similar perceptions, describing Prime Minister Kevin Rudd as being deeply knowledgeable on the subject.

“We both see China’s emergence as a major economy, a driving economy in the world, as offering great potential to both our countries,” he said.

“Potentials for growth, potential for prosperity of our citizens, who are also looking to reshape the international regulatory system through the G20 in a way that ensures that new actors, such as China, are acting consistent with international norms.”

Mr Bader says visiting Australia will deepen the partnership on environmental and economic issues and that clean energy and trade will be key areas of discussion.

“Australia’s got great beef but we want to make sure that there are not obstacles to the import of US beef,” he said.

“But also the aviation sector is one where the US has found good customers is Australia in the past.”

Before Mr Obama arrives in Australia though, for what will be a brisk visit, he is spending time in Indonesia, home to the world’s largest Muslim population.

It will be the first visit to a Muslim country since he delivered a key address in Cairo in June 2009 and the White House has suggested the president’s return to his childhood home of Indonesia could be another opportunity to bridge the divisions with the Muslim world.

‘Most private colleges are money-spinning factories’

Bangalore, July 1 (IANS) The proposed oversight body for higher education is a “welcome development”, says Pushpa Bhargava, former vice-chairman of the Knowledge Commission. According to him, the present regulatory system is so inept that it is easy for anybody to set up a private professional college in India and fool regulators by hiring professors for three days.

“All you have to do is to rent a building, write to the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) for recognition, and then hire an ‘event manager’ – the same guy who arranges weddings and conferences,” Bhargava, a renowned biologist, told IANS.

The AICTE, which is the regulatory body for professional technical education, takes a couple of months to send its inspection team to see if the college has the required infrastructure, staff and equipment, he said.

“During that gap, the events manager obtains on rent everything from equipment, tables and chairs, office staff, books for a library and, of course, professors who can spare three days to be present in the building when the inspection team arrives,” Bhargava said.

“After that, recognition follows and the college is free to enrol students charging heavy tuition fees.” Most private professional colleges are money-spinning factories, he said.

“The going rental rate for a professor in Hyderabad a year ago was Rs.30,000 per day,” Bhargava said, adding that he came to know about this racket when an event manager “asked me to suggest names of professors who could come for three days and make Rs.90,000″.

Private engineering colleges in India account for over 80 percent of seats – a jump from 15 percent in 1960, according to data from AICTE. Nearly 50 medical colleges in the private sector have received recognition in the last six years.

The National Commission for Higher Education and Research (NCHER) proposed by the Yash Pal committee will replace AICTE, the Medical Council of India and about a dozen other professional councils and regulatory agencies including the University Grants Commission of which Yash Pal was once chairman.

Bhargava, who was founder director of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology in Hyderabad, says the Yash Pal committee’s recommendations should be put into action promptly. The challenge, he says, is to find the right people to run the NCHER.

But renowned chemist C.N.R. Rao, former science adviser to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, says he is not sure whether creating one more regulator at the top will revitalize the higher education system or make it just more bureaucratic.

It will be all right if the proposed NCHER stays an advisory body, he told IANS. But if it is going to take on the role of regulating the entire stream of educational sectors from agriculture and medicine to technology and law “it is going to become a huge elephant and unmanageable”.

Rao said he had already expressed his concerns to Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal and hoped to discuss with him the possible ramifications if the plan was implemented in haste.

Goverdhan Mehta, former director of the Indian Institute of Science and member of the Yash Pal committee, says the report released June 24 was the result of interactive meetings “with thousands of fellow academics and all stakeholders including private players”.

ICICI Bank urges government to unveil borrowing plans

Kolkata, April 4 (IANS) India’s largest private lender ICICI Bank Saturday urged the government to spell out ‘how it plans to manage its borrowings’.

‘There are concerns on the impact the government borrowings will have on liquidity, pushing up interest rates,’ K.V. Kamath, managing director and chief executive of ICICI Bank, said at the convocation of the Indian Institute of Management here.

He said the government should articulate ‘how it plans to manage its borrowings along with measures to encourage external inflows into the country through channels like foreign currency deposits by non-resident Indians’.

Kamath, who will step down as the CEO next month, said the regulatory system should be strengthened.

‘There is a need to strengthen regulatory oversight, address large and systemically important institutions including non-banking financial institutions and develop healthy market structure,’ he said in his address.

World economic powers reach deal to combat crisis

World economic powers reach deal to combat crisis London – The world’s biggest economic powers reached a deal Thursday aimed at forging a new global financial order and shielding poor countries from the fallout from the economic downturn by boosting funds for international organizations by more than 1 trillion dollars.

After seven hours of tough wrangling over how to tackle the global recession, the Group of 20 (G20) of the world’s most advanced and emerging economies pledged in their communique “to do whatever is necessary to restore confidence, growth and jobs.”

Speaking at a press conference Thursday winding up his first major foray onto the world stage, US President Barack Obama hailed the summit as taking “unprecedented and co-ordinated action” to face up to the recession.

But agreeing to an overhaul of the financial system helped to paper over differences that emerged at the summit, with the G20 leaders stepping back from expected plans to announce additional fiscal measures to spur global growth.

Instead, the G20 signed off on steps aimed at greater market supervision and closing off the gaps in the regulatory system in an effort to avoid future crises by bringing market rules into line with the changes unleashed in recent years by fast-paced globalization.

Under the accord hammered out in London, the G20 leaders agreed to give the International Monetary Fund (IMF) more financial firepower, raising the organization’s resources by 500 billion dollars to 750 billion dollars.

The extra financing is designed to enable the IMF to better help developing countries engulfed by economic crises.

The G20 leaders also agreed to a 250-billion-dollar plan to shore up global trade in the face of the dramatic slide in the economy.

Another 100 billion dollars is also to be made available to the World Bank and a group of development banks, including the Asian Development Bank.

Emerging economies represented at the G20, such as China, have been pressing for an overhaul of the world’s top financial institutions as part of an effort to loosen the grip of the United States and other advanced nations on bodies such as the IMF.

A planned review of the IMF and the World Bank is also likely to include China’s call for a new IMF reserve currency, British Prime Minister and G20 host Gordon Brown said.

“The global crisis is hitting emerging market and poor countries hard,” said IMF managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

“The G20 leaders have today sent a powerful signal that the international community is committed to support these countries, including by ensuring that the IMF has the resources available.”

Ending what had been a tough round of negotiations at the summit on how to haul the world economy out of its downturn, Brown said the leaders vowed “to prevent a crisis
(like this) happening again.”

However, at one point during the summit it appeared that the differences might be unbridgeable with officials returning to their hotels and leaving the leaders to write the final statement, delegation sources said.

“We have turned the page,” said French President Nicolas Sarkozy. “There have been moments of tension but we never thought we could reach such a big agreement.”

The G20 leaders also agreed to a clampdown on tax havens and the hedge fund industry, estimated to be worth about 1.6 billion dollars. They also agreed to stepped-up supervision of credit rating agencies.

Along with this, the leaders are likely to sign off on a plan to establish a new monitoring system, a so-called global “college of supervisors,” that would mirror the cross-border activities of the world’s largest financial institutions.

As part of strengthening the global market structure, the leaders also plan to replace the existing Basel-based Financial Stability Forum, which brings together global market regulators, with a new Financial Stability Board with a beefed-up mandate.

“Major failures in the financial sector and in financial regulation and supervision were fundamental causes of the crisis,” the leaders said in their statement.

But the scale of the changes means that the summit represents only a step along the path to an overhaul of the global financial system with another meeting already being planned for later this year in New York.

The leaders also issued another stern warning about the threat posed by protectionism and the risks from global warming. They also called for efforts to reactivate a stalled round of talks on world trade.

Thursday’s meeting represented only the second time that the G20 leaders have met since the organization was formed two decades ago.

Nevertheless, the G20 accord helped to boost the mood of global investors, with world stock markets chalking up hefty increases on the back of the summit agreement.

This was despite a steady stream of grim economic data, with figures released this week showing the recession tightening its grip on Japan, the US and Europe.

Comprising nations such as Britain, the United States, Germany and France as well as India, China and Brazil, the G20 represents about 85 per cent of world economic activity.

The G20 powers also addressed the anger generated by big bonus payments to bankers who were often seen as being at the heart of the financial crisis, which was triggered by a meltdown in the US mortgage market. This involves recommending new global rules for the remuneration of top managers. dpa

Next stimulus package to revive the economy after elections

New Delhi, Mar 28 (ANI): Deputy Chairman of Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia has acknowledged the need for another stimulus package for reviving the economy in next fiscal.

Talking to the reporters on the sidelines of a function in New Delhi today to mark the release of a report on Competition and Regulation in India, Ahluwalia revealed that this could be considered in the budget after the General Elections.

He further informed that the Planning Commission is conducting an exercise to measure the impact of the stimulus packages announced in the former years.

The report released on the occasion dealt with the various regulative ways to leverage economic growth. The report has emphasised the need of a regulatory system in various sectors including higher education, agriculture and railways.

The report has also brought to notice the super cession of regulators by the government in the power sector as well as dishonest practices of excessive subsidy and provision of employment, which has led to deprivation of electricity boards.

It has called for finer corporate governance in the sector. (ANI)

A new deal for the stricken global economy

Washington/Berlin – The world’s big economic powers will hold an emergency summit in London next week amid a deepening sense of despair about the outlook for the world economy and with few signs that major nations have laid aside differences on how to combat the global recession. While the Group of 20 (G20) meeting of the most advanced and emerging economies will mark US President Barack Obama’s first major foray onto the world stage, tensions have emerged notably between Washington and Europe over the need for another round of fiscal stimulus packages to spur world growth.

As a result, the world leaders gathering in London’s vast new trade centre on the banks of the River Thames for the G20 summit will be facing pressure to draw up a tenable and coordinated strategy to drag the global economy out of its biggest downturn since the Second World War and to head off moves to protectionism.

The World Bank last week said 17 of the countries that make up the G20 have adopted some form of trade restricting measures as many governments look to prop up their own struggling industries.

All this has raised doubts about whether the G20 summit will be able to sign off on a concrete set of proposals for delivering what the meeting’s host British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has called a “global new deal.”

In addition to the US and Britain, the G20 summit will include the leaders of Canada, France, Germany, Australia, Indonesia, China, Argentina, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, India, Brazil, Japan, Italy, Russia, South Africa and Mexico.

Despite broad agreement on moves to tighten world financial regulation and boost funding for key international institutions, European opposition to additional fiscal packages will make it hard for the summit to propose additional public spending to spur growth.

“They will find a global solution to the regulatory system, but I am more skeptical about agreement on further stimulus measures,” said ING economist Carsten Brzeski.

This means London could prove to be the first major test of Obama’s diplomatic skills. His administration released a series of plans on long-term regulation and minimizing the effects of the financial collapse in the run-up to the G20. Obama has pushed for equally “aggressive” actions from other states.

From a slew of disastrous economic data to more anecdotal evidence of collapsing order books, cutbacks in lavish Indian weddings through to mass layoffs of miners in Africa as commodity demand slumps, all indications are that the global downturn is far from over.

The financial crisis at the heart of the downturn also shows precious little sign of stabilizing.

Credit markets are still largely frozen, major banks are still in danger of bankruptcy and developing countries are still reeling from an exodus of private investors. Despite a rally over the last week, global stock markets remain in the doldrums.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) last week forecast the global economy would shrink as much as 1 per cent this year – the first worldwide contraction in 60 years – and warned of an even “deeper and prolonged” recession if governments cannot find a way to stabilize the financial system.

“Before we redesign the firehouse, we need to extinguish the fire,” writes Stewart Patrick, a senior fellow at the Washington- based Council on Foreign Relations. “Success in London will require credible commitments to restore the global economy and to stabilize world financial markets.”

Also underscoring the sense of urgency facing the leaders as they gather in London is the risk that some national economies could lose the battle to stay afloat as the recession tightens its grip, forcing richer nations or leading international institutions to launch costly rescue plans to bail them out.

That danger has sparked one of the few points of agreement among G20 powers: More money for the IMF, which serves as an emergency lender for countries facing budget shortfalls.

On top of the wider economic threats, the G20 leaders will be meeting amid a groundswell of public anger over greedy Wall Street banks, which sparked the crisis thanks to risky investments in the US housing market but whose survival is also critical to pulling the world’s economy back from the brink.

Next week’s summit will be only the second time that the G20 leaders, which together represent about 85 per cent of the world’s economic activity, have met in the bloc’s decade-long history.

The first summit in Washington in November came against the backdrop of a global financial shock triggered by a dramatic meltdown in the US mortgage market, with the G20 leaders laying out the broad strokes of a stricter financial regulatory regime.

As was the case in Washington, the April 2 gathering in London will also underscore the growing economic and political clout of the world’s leading emerging economies – like China and Brazil – and the consequent shift in the balance of economic power away from the world’s top industrial states.

But after a long run of prodigious growth, China’s economy appears to be faltering as key exports markets dry up, consequently forcing millions of rural workers to return from the city to a tougher and less prosperous life in the countryside.

Yet the real threat looming over the G20 leaders is that without urgent action, the financial and economic crisis could transform into a jobs crisis as workers around the world are laid off in the face of plummeting economic demand.

Consequentially, with the global economic gloom deepening since November, much of the focus in London now looks set to being on the same short-term measures that dominated the Washington summit six months ago.(dpa)

Most UK parents concerned about video games’ content

London, February 27 (ANI): The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) has found in a survey that almost three quarters of parents are worried about the content of video games, and want that the gaming industry be regulated independently.

Conducted by YouGov on behalf of the BBFC, the survey revealed that most parents in the UK thought that video games should be given the same kind of age classifications as films are granted, and an independent body should be created for the purpose.

The surveyors found that about 80 per cent of the people were concerned that video games could affect the behaviour of some children, while 77 per cent said that game ratings should reflect the concerns of parents.

The survey, which had 2,143 adults questioned, also found that 82 per cent of parents believed it would be helpful if video games used the same age ratings systems as films and DVDs.

It comes as the Government considers the findings of the Byron Review, a paper written by parenting expert and psychologist Tanya Byron, into the steps that need to be taken to safeguard children in the digital age.

The Byron Review recommends that video games designed for people aged 12 and over, regardless of content, should be reviewed by the BBFC for classification prior to release.

“This poll clearly shows parents support a regulatory system for games that is independent of the industry and UK based, reflecting UK sensibilities and sensitivities,” the Telegraph quoted David Cooke, director of the BBFC said, as saying.

“The BBFC has been classifying games for over 20 years and our decisions reflect the views of the public. Our classification systems and symbols are known and trusted by the public and in a converging media world they want to know what their children are playing as well as watching,” he added.

Mike Rawlinson, director-general of Elspa, the body that represents the video games industry, said that he understood the concerns raised by the BBFC about protecting children.

“UK parents need a system for videogames age classification that is built with the protection of the new generation of children in mind, and as such, delivers a robust system that works as well for games bought in-store as played online,” he said. (ANI)