Eight ”tipsy” pilots sacked: DGCA

New Delhi, Jun 6 (PTI) Delhi accounted for half the cases of drunkenness among pilots detected last year, according to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). Out of the 42 cases of pilots reporting drunk for duty, as many as 21 cases were detected at Delhi airport.

Another 11 were found under the influence of alcohol at Mumbai airport. In response to an RTI enquiry by Abhishek Shukla, the DGCA has now revealed some details of the disciplinary action taken against the “tipsy” pilots.

Eight of the pilots who tested positive for alcohol on duty were sacked and and the remainder were suspended or taken off flying duty for periods ranging from 30 days to three months. The DGCA did not disclose the names of the pilots, the airlines for which they were working, or the details of the flights they were preparing to operate.

As many as 28 of the 42 pilots are still flying, presumably after serving out their suspension period. The DGCA is the regulatory body for civil aviation in India and is responsible for ensuring safety of operations.

Aviation authorities around the world, including the International Civil Aviation Organisation, mandate a zero tolerance to alcohol as far as pilots and cabin crew are concerned. Drunkenness among pilots directly impacts flight safety.

Pre-flight alcohol testing is mandatory for pilots and cabin crew and the DGCA conducts surprise checks on pilots, both pre-flight and post-flight, to ensure that the no-alcohol rule is not violated.

Pak blockage of Facebook, YouTube might increase traffic to these sites

Islamabad, May 21 (ANI): Pakistan’s blockage on wildly popular web-sites like YouTube and Facebook will likely have a reverse effect from the one desired by authorities as curious Netizens would log onto these sites to see what the brouhaha is about.

Pakistan’s telecom regulatory body, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has said it found ‘sacrilegious’ content on YouTube, leading them to block it. Incidentally, YouTube has been co-founded by Jawed Karim, a Muslim.

“We have asked the Internet service providers to block more than 450 web links, which contain derogatory material,” The News quoted a PTA spokesman, as saying.

“The action follows our repeated attempts to convince these websites to discard such material,” he added.

He said the PTA had approached the administrators of the websites through emails, however he could not name the officials who had been contacted.

Industry officials, on the other hand, say the authorities have yet to get in touch with the people who run Facebook and YouTube, the report said.

These hasty suppressive tactics are probably not going to be too fruitful, according to industry officials.

“There is no way of stopping this. The day government lifts restriction from these websites, the Internet traffic will double. People will visit them just out of curiosity,” said an advertiser, who deals with Facebook and YouTube. (ANI)

Sibal to table Higher Education Reforms Bill in Parliament today

New Delhi, May 3 (ANI): Union Human Resource and Development (HRD) Minister Kapil Sibal is expected to table four bills in Parliament today, including one on permitting the entry of foreign universities to the country.

The other bills expected to be introduced in Parliament are linked to the checking of malpractices by educational institutions, setting up of a national accreditation agency and having specialised educational tribunals to adjudicate disputes in campuses.

The Cabinet had on March 15 cleared the Foreign Educational Institutions (Regulation of Entry and Operations) Bill, which seeks to allow the entry and operation of foreign universities in the country.

The major provisions of the bill are conditions like Rs. 50 crore as corpus fund to be deposited by the aspiring institute to be allowed to operate.

Each institute will have to be registered with the University Grants Commission (UGC) or any regulatory body in place at the time of registration.

The bill has a provision under which the government can reject an application of a university if it feels that the venture will have an adverse impact on national security.

Provisions of Section 25 of the Companies Act will be applicable to foreign institutes, under which they cannot take the profit back, but will have to spend the amount for further expansion of the institutions here.

Sibal will also introduce Prohibition of Unfair Practices in Technical Educational Institutions, Medical Educational Institutions and University Bill, which was approved by the Cabinet in March.

The bill seeks to consider such practices as criminal or civil offences depending on the nature of the crime.

He will also put forward the Educational Tribunal Bill, which provides for the setting up of tribunals to settle all types of disputes, including any type of malpractice or harassment of students.

The National Accreditation Regulatory Authority for Higher Educational Institutions Bill will also be introduced. (ANI)

Tiger in for a ‘heckle’ of a time at this year’s St Andrews Open

St Andrews, Apr 28 (ANI): Chief of R&A – the regulatory body of golf, Peter Dawson has announced that no extra security will be provided to the beleaguered golfer Tiger Woods at the Golf Open in St Andrews.

The move may leave Woods, who has faced stinging criticism following his numerous extra-marital dalliances at the mercy of jeering spectators.

That notwithstanding, Peter Dawson maintains St Andrews is not “a police state and people can say what they like as long as it doesn”t put them off and it is not intrusive to the game.

“The response we saw at Augusta was not exactly enthusiastic. The overwhelming feeling was relief. Tiger was back when it looked like he might be out for quite some time.” the Sun quoted him, as saying.

“His behaviour deteriorated. No one who cares for the etiquette of the game would have been happy” he added.

Woods’ unsportsmanlike at the Masters this year had shocked spectators after he threw clubs and uttered obscenities as he missed a cut in a Major for the first time in thirteen years as a pro.

Woods has made a comeback to professional golf in the aftermath of intense personal turmoil and negative publicity. (ANI)

Sohail’s diatribe against Butt for Pak’s World Cup hosting fiasco

Lahore, Sep.4 (ANI): Former Pakistan captain and left hand opener Aamir Sohail has criticized Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chief Ijaz Butt for misleading board patron, President Asif Ali Zardari and the public on the 2011 World Cup hosting issue.

Sohail, who resigned from the National Cricket Academy’s (NCA) Director post recently, flayed Butt for calling general public ‘naove’.

Let me assure Mr. Ijaz that the people of Pakistan are not naove. They are passionate about cricket, knowledgeable and fully aware of what is going on in the world of cricket. With all due respect Mr. Ijaz, you are the one who is wearing blinkers and do not have a clue as how to handle the affairs of cricket domestically and internationally,” Sohail said.

Sohail, in his statement, said Butt has no idea about tackling issues at international forums and held him responsible for the 2011 World Cup hosting fiasco.

“His letter to the ICC president accusing the chief executive officer of the ICC of influencing full members to support the IDI’s (commercial arm of the ICC) decision to relocate matches from Pakistan does not augur well with diplomatic norms when you are handling international matters, Mr Ijaz must know,” Sohail stated.

He lambasted Butt for the inept method in which the probe regarding March 3 terror attack on the visiting Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore proceeded.

Sohail raised questions over the laid back attitude of the PCB, saying the whole issue was mishandled by the board.

“It was a major contributory factor in the subsequent developments vis-a-vis the World Cup 2011. The co-hosts were not contacted after the incident despite strong advice from some of his staff. Instead, he castigated ICC match referee Chris Broad. This did not go well in the world cricket regulatory body,” The Daily Times quoted Sohail, as saying.

“It was height of incompetence of the PCB officials that rather than accepting the responsibility they tried to persistently pass the buck on the government,” he added. (ANI)

Reform of Education system on anvil

New Delhi, July 13 (ANI): In a bid to check the drop out rate in higher education, the Centre would launch Madhyam Shiksha Abhiyan programme as part of the proposed education reforms.

“We want to take Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan forward as Madhyam Shiksha Abhiyan as the drop out rate increases in higher education,” Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal said during Question Hour in the parliament.

Sibal also said that the government has no policy to introduce “uniform syllabus” in all the universities.

“Let there be creativity. Let there be competition among universities. So this is not government’s policy to introduce uniform syllabus in universities,” he said.

There may be a university focussing on bio-science and another on humanities, he said adding that let the student choose the university based on his or her preference.

He, however, said there should be a CBSE (class 10th or 12th) degree for skilled education as children want jobs immediately after completing school rather than pursuing professional courses.

On the issue of complaints regarding diversion of funds by states under the Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, Sibal said there were lakhs of schools across the country, it was not possible to carry out audit of each and every school and the CAG takes a sample audit.

Furthermore, he informed the parliament that the Government is in favour of bringing about a regulatory body to monitor the functioning of foreign universities as it is determined to prevent the exploitation of Indian students.

“We will not allow our students to be exploited by any one. We have our eyes firmly on setting up several world-class educational institutions which could make our children compete with others anywhere,” Sibal said. (ANI)

‘Most private colleges are money-spinning factories’

Bangalore, July 1 (IANS) The proposed oversight body for higher education is a “welcome development”, says Pushpa Bhargava, former vice-chairman of the Knowledge Commission. According to him, the present regulatory system is so inept that it is easy for anybody to set up a private professional college in India and fool regulators by hiring professors for three days.

“All you have to do is to rent a building, write to the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) for recognition, and then hire an ‘event manager’ – the same guy who arranges weddings and conferences,” Bhargava, a renowned biologist, told IANS.

The AICTE, which is the regulatory body for professional technical education, takes a couple of months to send its inspection team to see if the college has the required infrastructure, staff and equipment, he said.

“During that gap, the events manager obtains on rent everything from equipment, tables and chairs, office staff, books for a library and, of course, professors who can spare three days to be present in the building when the inspection team arrives,” Bhargava said.

“After that, recognition follows and the college is free to enrol students charging heavy tuition fees.” Most private professional colleges are money-spinning factories, he said.

“The going rental rate for a professor in Hyderabad a year ago was Rs.30,000 per day,” Bhargava said, adding that he came to know about this racket when an event manager “asked me to suggest names of professors who could come for three days and make Rs.90,000″.

Private engineering colleges in India account for over 80 percent of seats – a jump from 15 percent in 1960, according to data from AICTE. Nearly 50 medical colleges in the private sector have received recognition in the last six years.

The National Commission for Higher Education and Research (NCHER) proposed by the Yash Pal committee will replace AICTE, the Medical Council of India and about a dozen other professional councils and regulatory agencies including the University Grants Commission of which Yash Pal was once chairman.

Bhargava, who was founder director of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology in Hyderabad, says the Yash Pal committee’s recommendations should be put into action promptly. The challenge, he says, is to find the right people to run the NCHER.

But renowned chemist C.N.R. Rao, former science adviser to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, says he is not sure whether creating one more regulator at the top will revitalize the higher education system or make it just more bureaucratic.

It will be all right if the proposed NCHER stays an advisory body, he told IANS. But if it is going to take on the role of regulating the entire stream of educational sectors from agriculture and medicine to technology and law “it is going to become a huge elephant and unmanageable”.

Rao said he had already expressed his concerns to Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal and hoped to discuss with him the possible ramifications if the plan was implemented in haste.

Goverdhan Mehta, former director of the Indian Institute of Science and member of the Yash Pal committee, says the report released June 24 was the result of interactive meetings “with thousands of fellow academics and all stakeholders including private players”.

Canada court reserves judgement in ski jumping case

Vancouver – A court in Canada has reserved judgement in the case of female ski jumpers who are suing to to compete in the 2010 Winter Olympics. After five days of hearings, British Columbia Supreme Court Justice Lauri Ann Fenlon said Friday the issues behind the case were “very complex” and that she needed time to consider all the arguments.

Fifteen female ski jumpers took the Vancouver Organizing Committee to court for the right to compete at the Vancouver Games.

Lawyers for the skiers argued that under Canadian gender discrimination law laid out in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms all ski jumpers should be allowed to compete.

If the court rules in their favour the Vancouver committee would have to tell the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to allow the ski jumpers to compete or cancel the men’s ski jumping events.

The Vancouver committee has argued that the February 12-28 Games programme is a matter for the IOC, which has said the women will not be ready for competition until the 2014 winter Games.

The IOC is the Games’ regulatory body and as a foreign organization is not obliged to follow the charter, its lawyer argued.(dpa)

Satyam management change after CLB approval -chairman

BANGALORE, April 12 (Reuters) – The change of management in fraud-hit Satyam Computer Services (SATY.BO) is expected to take place by next weekend after the board gets the approval from the Company Law Board (CLB), Satyam’s chairman said on Sunday.

Kiran Karnik said the government appointed board of Satyam will announce the highest bidder for the Indian outsourcing company on Monday and then will recommend the bidder to the CLB, a semi-judicial corporate regulatory body, for its approval.

“We can only recommend to the CLB and the final bidder will be announced by them,” Karnik told Reuters in a phone interview.

He said the regulatory approval was likely to be received by next weekend, after which the management of Satyam will be handed over to the buyer.

Three months ago, Satyam’s founder and former chairman, Ramalinga Raju, shocked investors by saying profits had been overstated for years, and putting in doubt the survival of the company once ranked as India’s fourth largest outsourcing firm.

The government quickly stepped in and sacked the board as it sought to limit damage from India’s biggest corporate scandal.

Indian engineering conglomerate Larsen and Toubro (LART.BO), which has a small software services unit, mid-sized outsourcer Tech Mahindra (TEML.BO) and U.S. private equity firm WL Ross and Co are among the suitors. [ID:nBOM203266]

For a FACTBOX on Satyam, see [[ID:nBOM417149]

For a TIMELINE on key events at Satyam, see [ID:nBOM435389] (Reporting by Sumeet Chatterjee; editing by Mike Nesbit)

Airline flouts rules, no action taken

ON MARCH 22, Captain Bavesh Mishra, the deputy chief of air safety and a senior pilot with SpiceJet, was grounded for reporting drunk at work. Three days later he operated a Delhi-Goa-Delhi flight (number 257/258).

According to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), a pilot failing the breath-analyser test should be grounded for three months. Hindustan Times has a copy of the airline roster dated March 25, which shows that Mishra operated the flight with another pilot S. Dwivedi.

His is not a one-off case. This newspaper has evidence about two more senior pilots of the same airlines who flouted safety rules but continue to fly.

Take Captain B. Russels, an expat pilot, for instance. Expat pilots cannot enter the cockpit unless the DGCA issues them a foreign aircrew temporary authorisation licence.

However, the airline has rostered him as an observer on three sectors, though he has not been issued the required licence. An observer’s job is to supervise the flying crew.

There are several mandatory safety procedures that the crew is supposed to follow. Another senior pilot, Captain John Curtis EKL, has not renewed his flying licence for the last two years.

The process, which is also called proficiency checks, is mandatory every six months. Also, the 62-year-old pilot’s training history shows that on August 5, 2007, he visited three places for training – Aces in Columbia, US; Delhi and some other centre.

A SpiceJet spokesperson told Hindustan Times, “The airline has a completely different point of view on this and has documentary evidence which counters your inference.” The spokesperson, however, did not wish to share the evidence.

The airline insisted that Hindustan Times could only access documents by visiting their Gurgaon office. Nasim Zaidi, directorate general, DGCA, did not respond to calls and test messages asking why the aviation regulatory body is yet to take action against the airline.

A senior DGCA official, requesting anonymity, however, told HT, “These loopholes could be exposed only if the regulator conducts regular safety audits but that’s not possible due to staff shortage.”.

India TV withdraws from regulatory body

New Delhi, April 10 (IANS) India TV news channel Friday withdrew from the News Broadcasters Association (NBA), to protest the self-regulatory body’s decision to slap a fine of Rs.100,000 on the channel for allegedly airing a fake interview with a US-based analyst of Pakistani origin.

India TV also protested the ‘partisan functioning of the NBA’ and blamed it’s decision on the alleged machinations of the rival India Today group. G. Krishnan, CEO of TV Today network, is president of the NBA.

The NBA, comprising leading broadcasters and social activists, is headed by former Supreme Court Chief Justice J.S. Verma.

‘We are compelled to notify our withdrawal from the membership of the NBA. This communication may also be kindly treated as a notice for withdrawal from the membership of the NBA with immediate effect,’ said a letter by India TV to the NBA’s president.

In its first order, the NBA slapped a Rs.1-lakh fine on India TV for violating the ‘principles of self-regulation and specific guidelines’ in handling the story based allegedly on an interview with Farhana Ali, a US-based writer, lecturer and policy analyst.

The NBA Standards Dispute Redressal Authority ordered that India TV pay the fine within a month and run an apology as a ticker on any one day between 8 pm and 9 pm, five times with a space of 12 minutes each, stating that Farhana’s story was a ‘misrepresentation of facts’.

In another letter to News Broadcasting Standards Disputes Redressal Authority, India TV has contended that Farhana Ali has already ‘accepted and appreciated’ an on-air apology run by the channel.

‘In fact, as a measure of her satisfaction with our sincerity, the complainant has gone on to voluntarily offer a live appearance on issues of her expertise,’ the letter said.

Maintaining that the channel had followed ‘due diligence’ in addressing Ali’s grievances, India TV also argued that the NBA had not taken into consideration Farhana’s letter before passing the order on April 6.

Earlier, the channel had asked the NBA authority to grant it a ‘personal hearing’ at its next meeting and consider Ali’s letter.

Accusing the NBA secretariat of ‘concealment’ and sins of commission and omission, India TV alleged that the secretariat, under the presidentship of the channel head of TV Today group, has ‘virtually become the personal fiefdom or a personal office of the TV Today Group.’

Contending that here was complete absence of objectivity or fairness in the functioning of the NBA secretariat in assisting the redressal authority, the channel said: ‘It seems that the NBA Secretariat works overtime in indulging itself in such acts of omission and commission whereby on the one hand the most relevant documents and facts were not placed before the Hon’ble Redressal Authority and on the other hand we stood deprived of our invaluable right of personal hearing and representation through counsel before the Hon’ble Authority, in violation of the mandatory regulations in this regard.’

Ali had alleged that India TV had misused an interview she had given to Reuters news agency, by ‘deceptively dubbing’ it in Hindi, a language she does not know or speak. She charged that this act was ‘factually incorrect, unethical and unjustified’, a statement issued by the NBA said. The channel had run the said interview as part of its coverage of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks.

India TV, however, maintains that it telecast the wire copy in a short two-minute story after midnight as what she said was important enough to be carried in the context of the Mumbai attacks. In the interview, Ali had said that there were more terrorists involved in the Mumbai mayhem. India TV, however, admitted that Ali’s utterances were para-dubbed in Hindi.

Ali asked India TV why had it telecast her views and protested against her description as a CIA spy. She asserted that she actually worked for the agency in a different capacity. India TV maintains this complaint was addressed and a correction was aired. The complaint was also voluntarily shared with the NBA Authority, sources in India TV said.

The NBA authority was formed by news broadcasters in October 2008, in the wake of concerns over media reporting of the Mumbai attacks, to create a self-regulatory mechanism and prevent any government intervention to control the electronic media in the form of a proposed Broadcasting Bill and Content Code.