Nothing in their defence: How India lost the plot at World Cup

India conceded 21 goals through the World Cup, the third highest after Canada and South Africa and gave away 23 penalty corners, the fourth highest.

These may just be numbers but they only confirm what has been repeatedly seen during the tournament — the Indian defence was the team’s sore spot all through.

“We played very well between the two circles,” Brasa admitted after India’s loss to Argentina. That, perhaps, sums up India’s story in the tournament. The midfield held up the middle but the finishers at either end were unable to back them up.

Sandeep Singh was the only experienced player in the backline but he was completely outplayed. The other two — Diwakar Ram and Dhananjay Mahadik — had both been included as specialist drag-flickers, making India’s defence a trio of PC experts. But apart from Mahadik to some extent, neither of the other two managed to do anything that could be called defending, and they failed in converting penalty corners as well. “We gave away some easy goals in every match. The defence is a concern and it is an area we need to work on,” Brasa said on Friday, as he has said after every game.

In every match India played here, at least one goal was scored in exactly the same way — unmarked scorer in front of an open goal with no defender, ball being put past the goalkeeper and deflected in. Against Argentina, when Lucas Vila scored their third goal, he was standing in front of an open net, the Indian defence nowhere in sight. Against Spain, it was Pol Amat in a similar position.

“We left a player each in front of the posts unmarked (against Argentina) and we left their key player Fernando Oscar Zylberberg unmarked and we paid for it,” Brasa said. Rajpal Singh also accepted there were concerns at the back.

“We have lacked in defence and finishing,” he said. Asked if it was the lack of experience that hurt them, Rajpal agreed. “Yes, that is a problem. But it is not lack of fitness,” he said.

Rajpal also said that the team were missing Dilip Tirkey’s experience. “The biggest problem is not that we do not have him, but that there is no one like him around to replace him either,” he said. For long, the Indian defence, marshalled by Tirkey, had been their strongest point. Now, all of a sudden, it has become India’s weak link.

Actors, crew of ‘Yeh Mera India’ get candid with media

Mumbai, Aug 21 (ANI): Cast and crew of Bollywood film ‘Yeh Mera India’ that brings to light several problems of the Indian society, got candid with media in Mumbai.

All the leading star cast, including Anupam Kher , Rajpal Yadav, Smilee Suri, Perizaad Zorabian, along with the Produce -Director of the film, N Chandra were present.

Speaking to the media on the occasion, Chandra said the film highlighted a subject, which he felt was quite important.

“I felt that no film is made on this topic and this needs to be talked about,” said N Chandra.

The movie also stars Atul Kulkarni, Seema Biswas, Milind Gunaji, Rajit Kapoor, and Sarika among others.

Perizaad Zorabian also talked about her role in the movie.

“It is very interesting story. There are many interesting characters in the film. Beauty of the film is that it will make you think and it will make you wonder, that you can make a difference and there are so many stories that are involved in the film. I am playing the role of a television executive producer and my character is that of educated , successful person who has everything in life but she still she complains about everything,” said Zorabian.

The film brings back the old memories of N Chandra films like ‘Tezab’, ‘Ankush’, ‘Kagaar’, ‘Tejaswini’, ‘Narsimha’ and ‘Pratighaat’.

The film is based on social elements that concern our daily life and problems of our society encounters such as caste, Hindu-Muslim issues and sexual harassment of the women at the work places.

It is slated to be released on August 28. (ANI)

South has shifted ‘out’

Mason Ranjit Singh could not get medical attention for six hours after a dog bit him in the ankle last month. The nearest hospital – the government-run Safdarjung Hospital – lay almost at the other end of town from his home in Tughlakabad Village.

“The only private nursing home is too costly and a dispensary near Asola village never has any stock,” said Singh. Welcome to the post-delimitation South Delhi, no longer the posh vision that the name conjures up.

With a vast rural expanse covering half the city from Bijwasan and Palam in the west to Badarpur on the eastern skirt and the ‘farmhouse-land’ of the Chhattarpur-Mahipalpur-Merhrauli belt in the south, this is one constituency where the Nuclear Deal and economic slowdown are non-issues. Instead, good-old promises of civic amenities still strike a chord.

So, politicians are promising jobs, access to healthcare, higher/technical education, and permanent civic amenities to woo voters. Sangam Vihar is Delhi’s biggest unauthorised resettlement colony near Tughlakabad.

“Politicians come and talk about permanent residence certificates, ration cards and sewer lines for the houses and clean drinking water,” said Kailash Kumar, a trader at the Sangam Vihar main market. In the Gujjar farmer-dominated Chhattarpur, the educated younger generation wants jobs in the ‘city’.

“I need to learn English and get out of here. I cannot work at the farmhouse like my brother or as a labourer like my father,” said Subhash Gujjar, a 22-year-old Arts graduate working as an office help in a farmhouse.

Farmhouses here stand as little islands in the sea of shanties of migrant labourers and landless farmers, most of whom sold their plots before the property boom arrived. Some 20 km to the west, 60-year-old Rajpal Shehrawat in the Jat-belt of Palam village shares the same ambition, albeit for his grandsons.

“Our generation was fooled by promises of development. We are neither in a city nor in a proper village.

Now, for the younger lot, we want colleges and industries here. They need to learn English and work for big companies,” he said between puffs on his hookah.

Amidst the squalor, the posh residential colony of Kalkaji sticks out. A part of the old South Delhi constituency with neatly painted houses, tree-lined parking lots and guarded colony gates, this Punjabi dominated area has very different concerns.

“If all work is directed towards the rural belt, I’m afraid our area might get neglected,” said businessman and resident Haran Anand.

Now, Navin Jindal becomes another shoe gate target

Kurukshetra, Apr 10 (ANI): Congress MP Navin Jindal today became another target of a shoe-throwing incident.

A retired school principal threw a shoe at him here on Thursday.

Rajpal, a former teacher, reportedly hurled his shoe while he was addressing party workers.

Later, Rajpal was taken to a local police station for interrogation. The reason behind the incident was not known.

According to sources, the lack of opportunities for teachers was cited as a reason.

Earlier, an agitated Dainik Jagran journalist threw a shoe at Union Home Minister, P. Chidambaram during a press conference at the Congress headquarters in Delhi.

In a similar incident, last December, Muntadhar al-Zaidi, an Iraqi journalist with Egypt-based al-Baghdadia television network, had thrown his shoes at former President George W. Bush during a news conference in Baghdad. (ANI)

Person can murder when there exists reasonable apprehension: SC

New Delhi, Mar 12 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Thursday absolved two men accused of murdering a man thirty years ago.

Dismissing an appeal filed by the Uttar Pradesh Government against the acquittal of Gajey Singh and Rajpal Singh in a murder case that occurred on January 27, 1979 in Meerut, the apex court argued that the murder was committed in self-defense, which is permitted under the law.

The apex court held that a person can kill another when there exists reasonable apprehension that his adversary is going to cause him/her grievous injury even though he might not have actually inflicted any.

A bench, including Justice Dalveer Bhandari and H S Bedi said, “In that event he can go to the extent of causing the latter’s death in the exercise of the right of private defense.”

In this case, Lakhi Ram, the murdered, along with a few companions had assaulted Gajey and Rajpal with sharp weapons at their residence.

In a bid to save his life, Rajpal fired a shot at Ram, resulting in his death. (ANI)