Didigiri Rules

India, June 5 — The lane leading to 30 B, Harish Chatterjee Street, close to the Kalighat temple in south Kolkata, is crowded on most days. But for the past three days, a fresh fervour appears to have gripped its residents. “Didi, didi, this way”, goes the chorus, as the lady emerges from the tiled house. Some dive at her feet, others attempt to garland her. Her neighbours in the dingy lane have closely witnessed the dizzy rise of Mamata Banerjee. From a student leader at the Jogmaya Devi College to the firebrand minister who is close to dislodging the 33-year-old communist government in West Bengal, she has come a long way. Banerjee’s political career is divided into three phases. First, as a young Congress worker, she trounced CPI(M) heavyweights such as Somnath Chatterjee in the 1984 Lok Sabha polls. In the second phase, between 1991-1997, she ran an almost parallel Congress organisation in Bengal that would later evolve into the Trinamool Congress. In the third phase, between 2006 and 2010, she spearheaded the Singur and Nandigram agitations, trouncing the Left in most elections held since. Most of her life as Congress member was spent trying to convince the party leadership about her credentials as the only leader who could give the Left Front a run for its money. Banerjee’s spunk impressed former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi. After his death, she got a ministerial berth in the P.V. Narasimha Rao Government. The same minister sat on a dharna against the government over the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act and fought the Pradesh Congress Committee elections against party satrap Somen Mitra. She lost and realised that the manner in which state leaders perceived the Congress should function and the way she saw it were different. In 1997, her relationship with the Congress leadership reached a nadir, when, during an AICC session in Kolkata, she launched the Trinamool Congress. Her flirtation with the BJP began and she fought the 1998 Lok Sabha elections with the saffron party. After a repeat performance in 1999 she became Railway Minister. Banerjee soon began to grow uncomfortable as her BJP connection was alienating her Muslim voters. A stir over kickbacks for the purchase of coffins for the army gave her the opportunity to wriggle out. In a hurriedly cooked alliance with the Congress, Banerjee fought the 2001 assembly polls and lost. She could not counter Buddhadeb Bhattacharya’s popularity and the simultaneous backstabbing by a section of Congress leaders. The National Democratic Alliance led by the BJP was a natural choice once again. But the Godhra riots further alienated her Muslim supporters and the 2004 Lok Sabha elections saw her party win just one parliamentary seat from Bengal: Banerjee herself. In the 2006 assembly elections too, her party fared badly. In almost three-decade long political career, Banerjee has remained an enigma. Her now-legendary mood swings have baffled even those close to her. She has often behaved rudely inside the Parliament and was even spotted hurling the “resignation letter” at the speaker. One of the lowest points of Banerjee’s career came in 1989 when she lost in the Jadavpur Lok Sabha polls to Malini Bhattacharya. More than the defeat, she became an object of ridicule for using “Dr” in her posters during campaigning. She defended her “degree”, but nobody could trace the East Georgia University that had conferred her the honour. In 1996, she attempted “suicide” by threatening to hang herself with a shawl accusing the Congress leadership of doling out assembly tickets to “criminals”. Banerjee’s split personality has evoked veneration and wrath from admirers and rivals respectively. Says senior journalist Manojit Mitra: “She is strange mixture. It is difficult to understand her appeal with our urban educated sensibilities. But she attracts the masses like a magnet.” “She talks something in the morning and the opposite in the evening”, says West Bengal CPI (M) secretary Biman Bose. After hours, didi, as she is popularly known, loves humming Tagore songs and playing the synthesiser. She also paints, mostly flowers and Lord Ganesha. She is on the treadmill at least once a day. Before and after her workouts, Banerjee works on her books – at last count she had written 17. Histrionics aside, Banerjee is one of the few Indian leaders who reach out to the common man in his own language. She often travels to remote villages to comfort grieving relatives of a party man. Reporters recall villagers leaving their meals and rushing out to have a glimpse of her motorcade. The agitation over Singur and Nandigram, which began in September 2006, revived Banerjee’s sagging political career. Her protests against land acquisition made her the darling of the rural masses, Left loyalists for long. The Communists gave in meekly and the Nandigram project was scrapped. Banerjee reaped rich dividends in the panchayat polls of 2008. In the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, the one-MP-party bagged 19 seats. There has been no looking back since. Whether it was the assembly by-elections or the school committee polls, the Trinamool Congress emerged as a formidable force in Bengal.

If recent poll results are any indication, Banerjee is inching closer to the red building at Dalhousie Square. For the past three days, she has remained huddled with top Trinamool leaders. “There is no governance in Bengal right now. I want early elections,” she said on Thursday.

State should exercise responsibly its right to use forces: Chidambaram

New Delhi, May 21 (ANI): Union Home Minister P Chidambaram on Friday said the right to use force should be exercised responsibly by the state, thereby asking paramilitary forces to tackle violence with “patience, tact and understanding”.

“In dealing with violence, the state alone has the right to use force. If the state uses it force, it has to be used responsibly. The state cannot use excessive force,” said Chidambaram.

“The state cannot use force against unarmed and defenceless people. These are the limitations that come with the right to use force,” he added while speaking at the Investiture ceremony of the Border Security Force (BSF).

The Home Minister asked the paramilitary forces to respect the limitations of the force.

“Remember that while the state has power to use force, we must respect its limitations because if we do not observe the limitations of the force, the people will question the intentions and the goals that have been set. The people will question the legitimacy of the state to use force,” said Chidambaram.

Chidambaram further said that violence is not new to India, asserting that one must remember that “we live in a very troubled world” and a “very volatile neighbourhood”.

“Within India there are groups who claim to speak for people with different causes and regard violence as legitimate. No one in the country other than the state has the right to use force,” he said, expressing confidence that the country will be able to tackle terrorism.

Chidambaram also awarded President”s gallantry and police medals to the BSF personnel and led the force and those present in taking a pledge against violence and terrorism on the occasion of Anti-Terrorism Day observed on Friday to celebrate the nineteenth death anniversary of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi. (ANI)

Is there a need for a fresh mandate to curb the Maoists?

New Delhi, May 21 (ANI): The brutal killing of 31 persons in Chhattisgarh soon after the Dantewada attack on the Central Reserve Police Force, which had claimed the lives of 76, indicates that while the Maoists are clear in their strategy, the Indian State – both at the Central and State levels – appears confused.

The attack on the civilian bus showed the ruthlessness of the Maoists, who have claimed that their targets were the 15 Special Police officers traveling in it.

The attack on the civilian bus, which was on a routine journey from Dantewada to Sukhma, has shown the Central and State Governments in poor light. Stung by the criticism, Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram said that he had a ”limited mandate”: the maintenance of law and order was the responsibility of the State, and the Government of India can only provide special forces when asked for and provide intelligence inputs and funds for development.

The remarks made earlier during the week by Congress General Secretary Digvijay Singh on the ”aggressive ”statements of Chidambaram following the Dantewada massacre, have added fuel to the controversy.

The controversy has not died down in spite of the statement made by the Congress President Sonia Gandhi in her article in the Congress Party journal Sandesh that while the country ”must address acts of terror decisively and forcefully”, it has to ”address the root cause of Naxalism”.

The rise of Naxalism, she said, is a reflection of the need for our development initiatives to reach to the grass roots, especially in our most backward of tribal districts.

On this occasion, one recalls that the late Rajiv Gandhi had mentioned that hardly fifteen percent of the funds allotted for development reaches the people. Even today, in the areas affected by Naxalism, the funds earmarked for development are not spent.

Soon after the Dantewada incident, the Home Ministry arranged for a briefing by the Planning Commission for elected members of Naxal-affected areas of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Bihar and Orissa, to provide them details of the programmes being implemented by the Government.

It was felt that elected members would take pains to monitor the implementation of flagship programmes of the Government of India and try to wean tribals away from Naxalism.

Ever since Chidambaram took over as the Home Minister at the end of 2008, he has assumed a proactive role in mobilizing different State Governments to take steps to curb Naxalism, which has been described by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as the most serious challenge that the country is facing.

Chidambaram has also invited the Naxals for talks – the only condition being that they should abjure violence for 72 hours before the commencement of dialogue. The Naxals have rejected the offer.

They know that talks and acceleration of development would mean that their hold on the tribals in the interior belt of the five states would be affected. The construction of a road network would open the hinterland and expose them to the security forces. As of now, the Naxals have been comfortable dealing with the local police, forest guards and contractors engaged in construction of roads and school buildings.

The month of April, when the tendu leave trade commences, is a sensitive time in the area. The Naxals were determined that the Central Reserve Police Force should not make inroads into territory which has been under their control for years. They issued warnings, declared ”bandhs”, and even slit the throats of villagers who defied their threats.

The ”leadership” of the Naxals does not belong to a particular region. From Koteshwar Rao to Ramana, most of them are ”migrants” from Andhra Pradesh , which was their original home for decades, before the so-called Operation ”Green-Hunt” displaced them. They are now established in safe havens in Bastar, Koraput, Midnapur, to name a few areas.

It is time that the Central Government told the Naxals in no uncertain terms that there would be no compromise with elements who challenge the unity and integrity of the country. It could use the armed forces, if necessary. Rightly, the Government has decided that so far there is no need to use the military, except Air Force helicopters for logistic purposes.

The Government of India has a clear mandate to ensure the unity and integrity of the country. It is not a ”limited mandate”. It is time “Operation Green Hunt” is pursued like a real ”Hunt”. (ANI)

E-mail ID: raoramamohan@hotmail.com

President Patil to take decision on Afzal Guru”s mercy petition: Sheila Dikshit

New Delhi, May 21 (ANI): Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit on Friday said President Pratibha Devisingh Patil would take the decision on the mercy petition of Afzal Guru, an accused in the Parliament attack case.

Dikshit said the file pertaining on the Afzal Guru case had been sent to both the Ministry of Home Affairs and the office of the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, and added that their replies are awaited.

“All orders given by the Supreme Court will be followed. However, at the same time, Guru”s wife has moved a mercy petition to the President of India. The file related to the case is with the Home Ministry and the office of the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi,” said Dikshit.

“Clearly, I am not in a position to decide Guru”s fate. Then what comment can I give?” she told the media persons, while attending a blood donation camp organized to commemorate the death anniversary of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.

The Bharatiya Janata Party on Wednesday protested against the delay by the Delhi Government in giving its opinion on the mercy petition moved by Afzal Guru, to show that this case was one of terrorism alone and had nothing to do with any community in particular.

Leader of Opposition in the Delhi Assembly V.K. Malhotra also criticised the Delhi Government for delaying the hanging of Afzal Guru due to vote bank politics.

Despite dithering by the government on the question of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru”s hanging, Congress on Wednesday made it clear that it favoured such a step at an early date.

“If the Supreme Court convicted Afzal Guru in the Parliament attack case giving him death sentence, there should be no problem in hanging him,” party general secretary Digvijay Singh.

Congress Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi had said the concerned authorities within the government should decide the matter.

Guru was awarded death sentence by a Delhi court on December 18, 2002 after being convicted of conspiracy to attack Parliament on December 13, 2001, waging war against the country and murder.

Delhi High Court upheld the death sentence on October 29, 2003 and his appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court two years later on August four, 2005.

Following this, Afzal filed a mercy petition with the President, who forwarded it to Union Home Ministry for its comments.

The Union Home Ministry had sent the file to Delhi Government”s Home Department for its comments, as per the laid out procedure.

The 2001 Indian Parliament attack, led to the death of a dozen people; five terrorists, six policemen and a civilian. It also caused increased tensions between India and Pakistan resulting in the 2001-2002 India-Pakistan standoff.

On that day, a group of gun-and grenade-wielding terrorists who stormed the seemingly impregnable Parliament House premises, were stopped dead in their tracks by security men as the nation watched in disbelief. (ANI)

Nation pays homage to Rajiv Gandhi on his 19th death anniversary

New Delhi, May 21 (ANI): The Nation on Friday paid homage to former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi on his 19th death anniversary.

The day is also observed as Anti-Terrorism Day.

The objective behind the observance of Anti-Terrorism Day is to wean away the youth from the terrorist/violence cult by highlighting the suffering of the common people and showing how it is prejudicial to the national interest.

These objectives are aimed to be achieved by organizing debates/discussions in schools, colleges and universities; holding of symposia/seminars and lectures on the dangers of terrorism and violence and a determined and sustained drive to bring about a mass awakening against terrorism and violence.

Voluntary organizations, social and cultural bodies are organising their own programmes through lectures, talks, discussions, musical and recitation programmes and cultural functions.

Mass education programmes are held to highlight the ill effects of violence and terrorism. Anti-terrorism/anti-violence pledge will be taken in all Government offices, public sector undertakings and other public institutions.

Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated on May 21, 1991 at Sriperumbudur in Tamil Nadu during a poll campaign. (ANI)

Is there a need for a fresh mandate to curb the Maoists?

New Delhi, May 21 (ANI): The brutal killing of 31 persons in Chattisgarh soon after the Dantewada attack on the Central Reserve Police Force, which had claimed the lives of 76, indicates that while the Maoists are clear in their strategy, the Indian State – both at the Central and State levels – appears confused.

The attack on the civilian bus showed the ruthlessness of the Maoists, who have claimed that their targets were the 15 Special Police officers traveling in it.

The attack on the civilian bus, which was on a routine journey from Dantewada to Sukhma, has shown the Central and State Governments in poor light. Stung by the criticism, Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram said that he had a ‘limited mandate’: the maintenance of law and order was the responsibility of the State, and the Government of India can only provide special forces when asked for and provide intelligence inputs and funds for development.

The remarks made earlier during the week by Congress General Secretary Digvijay Singh on the ‘aggressive ‘statements of Chdambaram following the Dantewada massacre, have added fuel to the controversy.

The controversy has not died down in spite of the statement made by the Congress President Sonia Gandhi in her article in the Congress Party journal Sandesh that while the country ‘must address acts of terror decisively and forcefully’, it has to ‘address the root cause of Naxalism’.

The rise of Naxalism, she said, is a reflection of the need for our development initiatives to reach to the grass roots, especially in our most backward of tribal districts.

On this occasion, one recalls that the late Rajiv Gandhi had mentioned that hardly fifteen percent of the funds allotted for development reaches the people. Even today, in the areas affected by Naxalism, the funds earmarked for development are not spent.

Soon after the Dantewada incident, the Home Ministry arranged for a briefing by the Planning Commission for elected members of Naxal-affected areas of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Bihar and Orissa, to provide them details of the programmes being implemented by the Government.

It was felt that elected members would take pains to monitor the implementation of flagship programmes of the Government of India and try to wean tribals away from Naxalism.

Ever since Chidambaram took over as the Home Minister at the end of 2008, he has assumed a proactive role in mobilizing different State Governments to take steps to curb Naxalism, which has been described by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as the most serious challenge that the country is facing.

Chidambaram has also invited the Naxals for talks – the only condition being that they should abjure violence for 72 hours before the commencement of dialogue. The Naxals have rejected the offer.

They know that talks and acceleration of development would mean that their hold on the tribals in the interior belt of the five states would be affected. The construction of a road network would open the hinterland and expose them to the security forces. As of now, the Naxals have been comfortable dealing with the local police, forest guards and contractors engaged in construction of roads and school buildings.

The month of April, when the tendu leave trade commences, is a sensitive time in the area. The Naxals were determined that the Central Reserve Police Force should not make inroads into territory which has been under their control for years. They issued warnings, declared ‘bandhs’, and even slit the throats of villagers who defied their threats.

The ‘leadership’ of the Naxals does not belong to a particular region. From Koteshwar Rao to Ramana, most of them are ‘migrants’ from Andhra Pradesh , which was their original home for decades, before the so-called Operation ‘Green-Hunt’ displaced them. They are now established in safe havens in Bastar, Koraput, Midnapur, to name a few areas.

It is time that the Central Government told the Naxals in no uncertain terms that there would be no compromise with elements who challenge the unity and integrity of the country. It could use the armed forces, if necessary. Rightly, the Government has decided that so far there is no need to use the military, except Air Force helicopters for logistic purposes.

The Government of India has a clear mandate to ensure the unity and integrity of the country. It is not a ‘limited mandate’. It is time “Operation Green Hunt’ is converted into “Operation Red Hunt”. (ANI)

E-mail ID: raoramamohan@hotmail.com

Social activist in Mumbai felicitated for curing thousands of leprosy patients

Mumbai, May 19 (ANI): Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Chavan felicitated social activist Brother Christudas with ”The Week – Man of the Year 2009” in Mumbai on Tuesday for curing thousands of leprosy patients.

Brother Christudas, who has treated over 50,000 leprosy patients in Bihar”s Sundarpur village expressed his happiness to receive such an award.

”I feel delighted because it is honouring social workers, who are involved in this kind of work. It”s not a personal award; it is for all those social workers, who are working for the people,” said Christudas.

“Leprosy patients are such a group of people who are being denied of, rejected by everybody. I thought I should do something for them,” he added.

Meanwhile, Ashok Chavan said the Maharashtra Government is starting Rajiv Gandhi Health Mission, under which people of the Below Poverty Line (BPL) category would be given treatment free of cost.

“The State government has officially launched the mission and work would start soon, he said.

Besides Chavan, novelist Shobha De was also present to felicitate the activist at the function. (ANI)

India extends ban on LTTE for two more years

New Delhi, May14 (ANI): The Union Government on Friday extended its ban on the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) for another two years.

The Union Home Ministry has issued a notification in this regard.

The LTTE was banned under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).

The LTTE, also known as Tamil Tigers, is a terrorists group that has waged a violent campaign against the Sri Lankan government since the latter part of 1970s in order to create a separate Tamil state in the northern and eastern part of the island nation.

The group-led by V Prabhakaran had been proscribed as a terrorist organization by several countries including the United States.

The LTTE was involved in the assassination of former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in May 1991 and the group has been banned by India since 1992.

India was the first country ban the LTTE followed by USA, United Kingdom, 27 European Union Countries, Canada and it is learnt that Australia as well as Malaysia are seriously contempt plating on banning this terrorists’ outfit in their soil. (ANI)

Gates Foundation, Bihar ink deal for better health

Patna, May 13 (ANI): The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) with the Government of Bihar to ensure better delivery of medicare.

With the signing of this MoC, the foundation will extend aid to various health projects in selection districts of the state.

The memorandum was signed in the presence of Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar.
“The Gates Foundation has its biggest focus on improving health. So, as we watched over the last few years, Bihar really makes a priority to improve health, including things like immunisation. We have been very impressed. So, during my last visit, the Chief Minister and I had a conversation that kicked off the discussions that led to today”s Memorandum of Co-operation,” said Bill Gates.

The memorandum aims to improve and increase the availability, quality and utilisation of health-care facilities and services.

This is an initiative to reduce maternal mortality rate (MMR) and infant mortality rate in Bihar.

Various health-related projects including eradication of tuberculosis, pneumonia, diarrhoea using will see support of the Gates Foundation.

“There will be intervention by the foundation in eight districts, to scale up and improve the work that has already been started in the state. The projects in which they will support in these eight districts include work in the fields of pneumonia, diarrhoea, Kalaazar and tuberculosis,” said Nitish Kumar.

During the visit, Gates interacted with the locals and generated awareness on various health-related measures.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, regarded as one of the biggest charitable trusts in the world, is expected to collaborate with the Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust for running various welfare programmes at several places in India. (ANI)

Will Rajiv Gandhi’s vision for SAARC be achieved at Thimphu?

New Delhi, Apr 28 (ANI): The first summit of the South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation in 1985 saw the enthusiastic participation of Rajiv Gandhi, who had just become the Prime Minister of India the previous year following the assassination of Indira Gandhi.

Elected by a massive majority in Parliament of India, young Rajiv Gandhi was hopeful of ushering India into the twenty-first century, promoting harmonious relations within the country as also in the neighbourhood and also developing the subcontinent into a homogeneous entity.

Within the country, he had entered into the landmark Punjab and Assam Accords, and in the subcontinent extended his hand of friendship to Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka with whom India had many misunderstandings.

India’s relations with Bangladesh had soured following the assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and Pakistan continued to entertain hostility inspite of the Shimla Accord. The Sri Lankan Government had a festering sore with the uprising of Tamils in northern part of the country, led by the LTTE.

Rajiv Gandhi initiated steps to reach an accord with Sri Lanka to ensure peace in the northern part of the country, and ensure that the refugees in Tamil Nadu could return to their homeland and the LTTE would lay down its arms.

For Rajiv Gandhi, the promotion of South Asia as a region of peace was an act of faith. After agreeing to have the summit in Bangladesh, even though India was the senior member, he agreed to hold the next summit in India.

I had the privilege of being associated with the first few summits as Principal Information Officer of the Government of India between 1985 and 1992. And also witnessed how the Association was unable to take off in spite of sincere efforts, mainly because of the mistrust between member countries.

The second summit, held in Bangalore (now Bengaluru) focused mainly on the conclusion of the India Sri Lanka Accord. President Jayawardene of Sri Lanka was the focus of attention and to ensure that the Sri Lankan delegation felt at home, the summit was held in Bangalore instead of New Delhi with

opposition Chief Minister Ramakrishna Hegde being the host. There were back channel negotiations with Prabhakaran of the LTTE, with the DMK extending a helping hand.

Simultaneously, Rajiv Gandhi promoted the idea of promoting friendship among the countries of the subcontinent. He hoped that travel between the countries would be easy and there would be increased trade among the countries.

India continued to have problems in traveling from West Bengal to Assam and the eastern States through Bangladesh. Sri Lanka continued to trade with the West even though the markets in Colombo and Jafffna were full of smuggled goods from Tamil Nadu.

Prime Minister M.K. Junejo of Pakistan, who had come to Bangalore, did mark his attendance, but nothing moved as President Zia-ul Haq had his own vision of promoting problems in Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir.

The relationship with Nepal also remained uneasy.

The second summit ended on a high note, but soon the Indian Peacekeeping Force in Sri Lanka, started facing problems and Rajiv Gandhi’s vision of promoting a South Asian community was a still-born child.

I remember attending the SAARC summits in Male in 1990 and Colombo in 1992. Vishwanath Pratap Singh attended the summit at Male and Narasimha Rao went to Colombo. The atmosphere on both occasions remained tense following the return from Sri Lanka of the Indian Peacekeeping Force and the

escalation of violence in the northern parts of the island nation.

On the positive side, many steps have been taken since then to create institutions that have the ability to promote regional cooperation. They include the SAARC Development Fund, the Food Bank, the South Asian Free Trade Agreement and the South Asian University. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has

taken the leading role in taking up these initiatives.

But these institutions have not taken off. There is more of smuggling among the countries of the region than ‘Free Trade’. The movement between the countries of the region is marked by illegal immigration.

India and Pakistan continue to be wary of each other. Terrorist attacks and infiltration across the Line of Control and the International Border continues.

Pakistan continues to claim that its soil would not be used against India but more than 40 terrorist training camps exist in that country.

Relations with Bangladesh has improved with Sheikh Hasina having taken over the Premiership, but she also has to proceed carefully. Sri Lanka has been able to subjugate the Tamil rebels, but the uneasy situation continues in the northern areas of the country.

Nepal is yet to promulgate a new Constitution for the country, and the Maoists are wary of promoting cordial relations with India.

Afghanistan, the most recent member, is also going through a state of flux and one hopes that it would settle down to be an active member of the SAARC.

It is fitting that the 25th session of the SAARC summit is being held in Thimphu in Bhutan. One hopes that the Himalayas surrounding the city would help elevate the mood of the participants to a higher level and take the association a step forward in the direction conceived by the late Rajiv Gandhi. (ANI)

I.Ramamohan Rao, former Principal Information Officer, Government of India. email. raoramamohan @hotmail.com

Expand South Asia intra-regional trade, investment flows: Manmohan Singh

Thimphu (Bhutan), Apr 28 (ANI): Indian Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh on Wednesday said intra-regional trade flows have grown, while transport and telecommunication links have expanded over the years between South Asian countries.

“I believe we should challenge ourselves by acknowledging that the glass of regional cooperation, regional development and regional integration is half empty. Intra-regional trade flows have grown and transport and telecommunication links have expanded,” said Dr. Singh in his opening statement at the two-day XVIth SAARC Summit that began here today.

“Yet, the share of intra-regional trade and investment flows in total trade and investment flows in South Asia is far below what we see in East and South-east Asia. It is also well below the potential,” he added.

Dr. Singh also hailed former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi as a man with a great vision.

“Speaking at the first SAARC Summit in Dhaka in 1985, Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi described the establishment of SAARC as an act of faith. Based on our experience so far we can affirm that this was also an act of great foresight and statesmanship,” said Dr. Singh.

“We have created institutions for regional cooperation, but we have not yet empowered them adequately to enable them to be more pro-active,” he added.

Dr. Singh said: “In these two and a half decades our subcontinent has been witness to much progress. Yet, each one of our countries, and our region as a whole, has a long way to go in fulfilling the aspirations of our people.”

“In looking back at these two and a half decades we can claim the glass is half full, and compliment ourselves, or, we can admit the glass is half empty and challenge ourselves,” he added. (ANI)

Sino-Indian ties never a zero-sum game, critical to meet common challenges: Krishna

Beijing, Apr.6 (ANI): Urging the younger generation of Indians and Chinese to draw inspiration from the early years, when both India and China became independent nations, visiting Indian External Affairs Minister S. M.Krishna said today that the architects of modernization and reform in both countries – Rajiv Gandhi and Deng Xiaoping – were also the prime movers of normalizing ties after a difficult interregnum.

He said that as India and China manage their domestic priorities well, it has huge implications for global prosperity.

“Between them, they are raising the living standards of almost one-third of humanity. When the question is raised about what we are doing for the world, it is often forgotten that our domestic development itself has a worldwide effect,” he said.

“In the last two decades, we have impacted significantly on global per-capita income, longevity and human development. Given the scale of what is underway, there is much that can be gained through our close cooperation. The economic models of India and China may be very different, but an exchange of best practices can still benefit both countries,” he added.

Krishna said: “The paradigm of co-existence has today been enhanced by more active engagement. But this is still not adequate. We must ask ourselves whether as neighbours and partners, each of whom are large and rising economies, are we making the best of opportunities?

He asked whether it is possible for India and China to leverage each other’s strengths?

“There is a huge infrastructure demand in India, covering sectors like power, roads, rail and telecommunications. In the recent budget, 46 percent of the total plan allocations are assigned for physical infrastructure development. China has actually carried out many of the changes that India is still contemplating,” he said, adding that there is considerable scope for joint projects as we master the practice of working harmoniously together.”

“There is a potential waiting to be tapped, which would happen only by connecting Chinese users to Indian providers (of IT). I am meeting representatives of Indian businesses in China later today and will encourage them to be creative in exploring opportunities here. We strongly feel that the India-China relationship is grossly under-realized and the capacities for expansion are enormous,” Krishna said.

“We must always remember that the two countries are each part of the other’s immediate periphery. Just by ensuring stability and promoting prosperity at home, we are actually serving each others’ interest,” he said.

“We cannot afford to be passive spectators. It is critical for our future that we cooperate actively in meeting common challenges. Our ties were never a zero sum game. Today, it is all the more important that we take an enlightened and long-term view of our self-interest,” the minister said.

“India and China must not just cooperate; they must be seen to be doing so by the rest of the world,” he added.

Recalling Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh’s view that the world is large enough to accommodate the aspirations of both countries, Krishna said: “It is a goal that requires strong olitical will, sustained engagement and a high degree of mutual sensitivity.” By Lokendra Singh (ANI)

India, China capable enough about readdressing boundary issue: Menon

New Delhi, Apr 1 (ANI): National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon Thursday said both India and China are confident enough about readdressing the boundary issue, which is a most complicated and difficult one, affecting bilateral relations.

Addressing a seminar on “India and China: Public Diplomacy, Building Understanding,” organised to mark the 60th anniversary of the Indo-China diplomatic ties, Menon said: “Both countries were confident enough to re-address the most complicated and difficult issue that affects bilateral relations, the India-China boundary question, at the political level.

“It was decided to entrust the issue to Special Representatives of the leaders” he added.

Menon”s statement came just days before External Affairs Minister S M Krishna’s Beijing visit.

During Krishna’s Beijing visit from April 5, both sides are likely to discuss dates for the 14th round of boundary negotiations between their Special Representatives.

Menon further said both countries have found ways to solve the boundary issue.

“The two countries have found a modus vivendi to deal with the fact of the boundary issue and to manage their different approaches to issues where their peripheries overlap,” he said.

In his address, Menon stressed that India and China can now consider the next steps in the evolution of bilateral ties.

“Both countries can now actively consider together the next steps in the evolution of our bilateral relations; evolve a detailed framework for the resolution of the boundary issue in a manner that is politically feasible for both leaderships; and, seize the opportunities for cooperation that the domestic transformations of our economies and the evolving global situation have opened up,” he said.

Menon said beginning with Foreign Minister Vajpayee’s 1979 visit to China and culminating in Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi’s visit to China in 1988, Indian and Chinese leaders decided that difficult and complicated boundary question would be addressed, “but would not stand in the way of the expansion of relations in other areas, including the economy and functional cooperation.”

Acknowledging that there are differences on many issues between India and China, Menon underlined the need for building congruences between both countries, while managing differences.

“Differences in worldview, structure, systems and foreign policy making have not prevented and will not prevent an expanding engagement between India and China,” he said. (ANI)

Nalini Sriharan to challenge government”s order in Madras High Court

Chennai, Mar 31 (ANI): Former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi”s assassin Nalini Sriharan is expected to move the Madras High Court challenging the decision of the Tamil Nadu Government that had rejected her plea for premature release.

Nalini informed about this to her lawyer P Pugazhendhi, who met her at Vellore”s high security women”s special prison on Tuesday evening.

Shocked to hear the state government”s decision, Pugazhendhi said the government has gone by a report of the Royapetta Police Station, which had anticipated law and order problem in the area if she was freed asserting that the Prison Advisory Board (PAB) committee members, who considered her premature release request, had given a report in Nalini”s favour.

Pugazhendi further said Nalini was ”shocked and disappointed” at the government”s decision as she was expecting a favourable report.

“Except that she had not admitted the guilt, what evidence is there that Nalini”s attitude has not changed? Even now, she says she has nothing to do with the crime and that she was a victim of circumstances,” he added.

The Tamil Nadu Government had on Monday accepted the recommendations of the Prison Advisory Board to refuse premature release to Nalini Sriharan.

The Karunanidhi- led Dravida Munettra Kazhagam (DMK) Government had on March 11 said it would take a final call on Sriharan”s plea in two weeks time.

The counsel for the State Government is said to have given this assurance to the Madras High Court.

Earlier on March 10, a two-judge bench of the high court, comprising Justice Elipe Dharma Rao and Justice K.K. Sasidharan, had asked the State Government to submit their report on March 11.

Tamil Nadu Government advocate G.Desingu claimed the Government had just received the report and sought time to study it.
Nalini, who is undergoing life imprisonment, is lodged in the Vellore Central Jail.

In her petition, she said she was entitled for release as far as 2005, as she had completed 14 years in jail.

Nalini was convicted on 16 counts of murder, and found guilty under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code on all counts. She was also convicted under Section 3 of TADA and Section 120-B of the IPC, dealing with conspiracy.

Sriharan”s original death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment after Sonia Gandhi sought a reprieve for Nalini after she had a baby daughter.

In September 2009, Nalini went on a hunger strike demanding that she be set free. (ANI)

Tamil Nadu Government rejects calls for Nalini Sriharan”s premature release

Chennai, Mar 29 (ANI): The Tamil Nadu Government on Monday accepted the recommendations of the Prison Advisory Board to refuse premature release to former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi”s assassin, Nalini Sriharan.

The Tamil Nadu Government was to deliver a verdict on Nalini”s premature release on Monday.

The Karunanidhi- led Dravida Munettra Kazhagam (DMK) Government had on March 11 said it would take a final call on Sriharan”s plea in two weeks time.

The counsel for the State Government is said to have given this assurance to the Madras High Court.

The state government also submitted the Prison Advisory Board report to the High Court.

“Hopefully, we should be able to report the decision before March 29, but the truth of the matter is the government has asked for certain additional details from the board and collector,” said P S Raman, Advocate General of the Tamil Nadu Government.

“For some factors, beyond the government”s control, if the decision making process takes a little longer we may have to ask the court for some more time,” added Raman.

Earlier on March 10, a two-judge bench of the high court, comprising Justice Elipe Dharma Rao and Justice K.K. Sasidharan, had asked the State Government to submit their report on March 11.

Tamil Nadu Government advocate G.Desingu claimed the Government had just received the report and sought time to study it.
Nalini, who is undergoing life imprisonment, is lodged in the Vellore Central Jail.

In her petition, she said she was entitled for release as far as 2005, as she had completed 14 years in jail.

Nalini was convicted on 16 counts of murder, and found guilty under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code on all counts. She was also convicted under Section 3 of TADA and Section 120-B of the IPC, dealing with conspiracy.

Sriharan”s original death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment after Sonia Gandhi sought a reprieve for Nalini after she had a baby daughter.

In September 2009, Nalini went on a hunger strike demanding that she be set free. (ANI)

Tamil Nadu Government to pronounce judgement on Nalini”s release

Chennai, Mar 29 (ANI): The Tamil Nadu Government will in all probability deliver a verdict on the premature release of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi”s assassin Nalini Sriharan on Monday.

However, it has been reported that the Karunanidhi- led Dravida Munettra Kazhagam (DMK) Government might take some more time in pronouncing its decision as Karunanidhi had earlier hinted that any decision
on such a sensitive matter has to be taken with care.
The State Government had on March 11 said it would take a final call on Sriharan”s plea in two weeks time.
The counsel for the State Government is said to have given this assurance to the Madras High Court.
The state government also submitted the Prison Advisory Board report to the High Court.
“Hopefully, we should be able to report the decision before March 29, but the truth of the matter is the government has asked for certain additional details from the board and collector,” said P S Raman, Advocate General of the Tamil Nadu Government.

“For some factors, beyond the government”s control, if the decision making process takes a little longer we may have to ask the court for some more time,” added Raman.

Earlier on March 10, a two-judge bench of the high court, comprising Justice Elipe Dharma Rao and Justice K.K. Sasidharan, had asked the State Government to submit their report on March 11.

Tamil Nadu Government advocate G.Desingu claimed the Government had just received the report and sought time to study it.

Nalini, who is undergoing life imprisonment, is lodged in the Vellore Central Jail.
In her petition, she said she was entitled for release as far as 2005, as she had completed 14 years in jail.

Nalini was convicted on 16 counts of murder, and found guilty under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code on all counts. She was also convicted under Section 3 of TADA and Section 120-B of the IPC, dealing with conspiracy.

Sriharan”s original death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment after Sonia Gandhi sought a reprieve for Nalini after she had a baby daughter.

In September 2009, Nalini went on a hunger strike demanding that she be set free. (ANI)

Attempts to freeze BSP symbol a conspiracy of opposition parties, says Mayawati

Lucknow, March 15 (ANI): Bahujan Samaj Party President Mayawati on Monday said that the attempts to freeze her party’s election symbol through various objections were a conspiracy backed by the opposition parties.

Ms. Mayawati also rejected the description that the elephant statues erected in parks and memorials to Dalit icons were related to her party”s election symbol, as she said that the statues the elephants have been shown welcoming with their snouts up, whereas the elephant in the BSP”s election symbol has been shown with its snout down.

The BSP is to submit its reply on a petition filed against the elephant statues with the poll panel on March 18.

Addressing her party’s massive rally on the occasion of 25 years BSP”s existence and the birth anniversary of its founder Kanshi Ram, at the Ramabai Ambedkar Maidan here on Monday, Ms. Mayawati said the Election Commission should take a view of the Congress and SP”s symbols.

Cycles were being distributed to the beneficiaries of the Savitribai Phule Scheme for girls launched by the BSP Government and the hand was used by leaders of all political parties to welcome people, Ms. Mayawati said.

During her 90 minute long address Ms. Mayawati trained her guns on the Congress and dubbed it as anti-Dalit, which supported the caste system.

Justifying the erection of her own statues along with other BSP leaders, Ms. Mayawati said: “Is there any law in the country which bans building statues of living leaders and whether funds can be spent only on erecting statues of dead leaders and not the living ones?”.

She pointed out that the statues of form prime ministers and congress leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi have been erected throughout the country by the Congress and several schemes, colleges, universities, airports, railway stations and roads using government funds have been named after them.

In last 63 years since Independence crores have been spent on building memorials and museums of Gandhi-Nehru family. But, when statues and memorials to Mr. Kanshi Ram and other icons are built, the BSP Government has been charged by the opposition with misusing government money, Ms. Mayawati reminded the public in the rally.

However, a giant garland, which was put around Ms. Mayawati by BSP supporters, attracted attention of all, as it was alleged that it was made of Rs. 1,000 Indian currency notes. (ANI)

Attempts to freeze BSP symbol a conspiracy of opposition parties, says Mayawati

Lucknow, March 15 (ANI): Bahujan Samaj Party President Mayawati on Monday said that the attempts to freeze her party’s election symbol through various objections were a conspiracy backed by the opposition parties.

Ms. Mayawati also rejected the description that the elephant statues erected in parks and memorials to Dalit icons were related to her party”s election symbol, as she said that the statues the elephants have been shown welcoming with their snouts up, whereas the elephant in the BSP”s election symbol has been shown with its snout down.

The BSP is to submit its reply on a petition filed against the elephant statues with the poll panel on March 18.

Addressing her party’s massive rally on the occasion of 25 years BSP”s existence and the birth anniversary of its founder Kanshi Ram, at the Ramabai Ambedkar Maidan here on Monday, Ms. Mayawati said the Election Commission should take a view of the Congress and SP”s symbols.

Cycles were being distributed to the beneficiaries of the Savitribai Phule Scheme for girls launched by the BSP Government and the hand was used by leaders of all political parties to welcome people, Ms. Mayawati said.

During her 90 minute long address Ms. Mayawati trained her guns on the Congress and dubbed it as anti-Dalit, which supported the caste system.

Justifying the erection of her own statues along with other BSP leaders, Ms. Mayawati said: “Is there any law in the country which bans building statues of living leaders and whether funds can be spent only on erecting statues of dead leaders and not the living ones?”.

She pointed out that the statues of form prime ministers and congress leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi have been erected throughout the country by the Congress and several schemes, colleges, universities, airports, railway stations and roads using government funds have been named after them.

In last 63 years since Independence crores have been spent on building memorials and museums of Gandhi-Nehru family. But, when statues and memorials to Mr. Kanshi Ram and other icons are built, the BSP Government has been charged by the opposition with misusing government money, Ms. Mayawati reminded the public in the rally.

However, a giant garland, which was put around Ms. Mayawati by BSP supporters, attracted attention of all, as it was alleged that it was made of Rs. 1,000 Indian currency notes. (ANI)

Mary Kom and Sarita Devi receive Awards

Imphal, Sep 14(ANI): Manipuri women boxers, four-time world champion M C Mary Kom and L Sarita Devi, were recently awarded with the country’s highest sporting honour the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna award and Arjuna award 2009 respectively.

President Pratibha Patil conferred the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna award on MC Mary Kom on August 29, for her success, which is a testament of her determination, perseverance and ‘never say die’ spirit.I began my career in 2000 and it’s almost ten years now and I believe this award is because of my continuous good performance,” said Mary Kom.

Mary Kom hails from Kangathei village, Moirang Lamkhai in Manipur and has several achievements under her belt.

At the national level, she has grabbed ten gold medals, and in the international arena, she has collected 14 gold and two silver medals.Apart from this, she had been bestowed with seven titles including the Arjuna Award, the Padmashree and the Indian Real Heroes Award.

While, 24-year-old L. Sarita Devi received the Arjuna award for winning a silver medal in her maiden appearance in the Asian Women’s Boxing Championship (AIBA). She also participated in fifteen other tournaments, winning seven gold, three silver and three bronze medals.

“I feel happy. I had applied for the award three years back but I didn’t get it. I think, I’m getting it a little late but I’m happy to receive the award this year. It has come as an encouragement for me to perform in future,” said L. Sarita Devi.

Sarita Devi works out 5-6 hours a day to stay fit, and she now wants to share her experience with other budding boxers in Manipur and guide them in their endeavor.

Her achievements have made her near and dear ones proud, especially her husband who supports her wholeheartedly.

“When we heard that she is getting the Arjuna Award, I felt really happy and emotional. It gave me an immense satisfaction that finally the fruit of her labor has paid off. I am really proud of her,” said Thoiba Singh, husband of Sarita Devi.

Both the boxers are at the present looking forward to competing in the next Olympic games. (ANI)

India’s swine flu death toll reaches 156

New Delhi, Sep 11 (ANI): The Swine Flu death toll in India has gone up to 156, with the death of 11 more people reported from different parts of the country on Friday.

The number of affected in India from swine flu virus has gone up to 5,611. The national capital Delhi reported its fifth death due to the swine flu.

Pune has now reported 40 A H1 N1 deaths-highest in India. While the rest of Maharashtra has reported 72 swine flu deaths so far.

Three more persons, a 48-year-old man, a 17-year-old boy and a three-year baby died in various hospitals of the city due to swine flu, said city health authorities.

The number of deaths due to the A H1N1 virus in Karnataka has increased to 53, with six more deaths reported from different parts of the state on Friday.

The Karnataka Health Department has confirmed four deaths of H1N1 virus in Bangalore, the other two in Davangere and Bijapur.

Out of the four deaths in Bangalore, two were reported from Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Chest Diseases (RGICD).

Meanwhile, the state Health Department along with the Global Hygiene Council organized a conference on the H1N1 flu on Thursday.

The conference focused on hygienic measures that can be adopted by people to avoid getting infected by the flu.

Meanwhile, 32 new cases tested positive for the H1N1 virus, out of which 25 were reported in Bangalore, 3 in Bijapur, one each in Bidar, Davangere, Bellary and Mysore.

Till date 686 people have tested positive for the flu in Karnataka. (ANI)