Super mining tax ‘an incredible mistake’

Chamber of Commerce and Industry Queensland (CCIQ) says the Commonwealth’s proposed super mining tax could spell the end of the Rudd Government.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says the 40 per cent super profits tax on mining companies will give Australians their fair share of revenue.

But CCIQ spokesman David Goodwin says it is an incredible mistake.

“I think if we thought the insulation program was big, this will dwarf it,” he said.

“What this has done is potentially killed the goose that has laid the golden egg – it is just a matter of when.

“How many jobs will be lost in the meantime, and probably more important – how bad will Australia’s international standing be for a place for mining investment.”

Bligh support

Meanwhile, the Queensland Resources Council (QRC) says it hopes Premier Anna Bligh can persuade the Federal Government to reconsider the proposed new mining tax.

QRC chief executive Michael Roche says the mining tax will jeopardise $100 billion worth of projects in Queensland.

Mr Roche and other mining leaders met with Ms Bligh last night to share their concerns.

“She made it clear she was serious about working with industry to get this tax improved, so that we get a positive outcome from Queensland investment and Queensland jobs,” he said.

He says Ms Bligh was sympathetic and has offered to take it up with the Commonwealth.

“I’m expecting that not long after [Federal] Treasurer [Wayne] Swan has delivered and bedded down his budget, he can expect to be contacted by the Queensland Government seeking talks about the problems with this so-called super profit tax,” he said.

Garrett inspects oil spill ship

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett has flown over the bulk coal ship stranded on the Great Barrier Reef off central Queensland this morning.

Three ships are expected to arrive later today to help transfer the remaining 950 tonnes of oil aboard the Shen Neng 1, which hit Douglas Shoal at full speed east of Rockhampton on Saturday.

The Chinese-registered ship ruptured a fuel tank when it ran aground, spilling more than two tonnes of oil into the ocean, but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Greens Leader Bob Brown and Queensland Transport Minister Rachel Nolan have already flown over Douglas Shoal this week.

Final preparations are being made to transfer oil from the stranded ship.

Maritime Safety Queensland spokesman Patrick Quirk says a number of ships are involved in the recovery operation.

“The bunker barge Larcom left Gladstone in the early hours of this morning,” he said.

“The Pacific Responder is on station. She’s the emergency response vessel.

“We also have some tugs chartered by MSQ carrying oil pollution booms. They’re on site as well in preparation for oil transfer operations tonight or tomorrow.”

Mr Quirk says crews have spent the past few days ensuring the ship is stable.

“We spent a number of days with the salvors and the surveyors on board assessing the vessel’s condition,” he said.

“The first major step of this operation will be to remove the oil from that vessel as far as we possibly can.

“We’ll be aiming to remove as much free oil as we can bearing in mind it will always be on this vessel because of the nature of its damage, some oil and water mixture in some of its tanks.”

Shipping law

The incident has prompted debate over shipping channels, pilotage and monitoring systems.

Queensland Resources Council (QRC) chief executive Michael Roche expects the industry will be consulted if changes are made to shipping in the Great Barrier Reef.

“If the government is contemplating such changes, I’m sure they’ll come knocking and we’re very open to discussing sensible changes,” he said.

“It’s in no-one’s interest to place in jeopardy such a great asset as the Great Barrier Reef.”

Mr Roche says the oil is a bigger environmental concern than the coal on board.

“I think the real fear from these sort of events are from the liquid fuels that power the ships rather than the cargo they’re carrying,” he said.

“I think people with other agendas, anti-coal agendas, are focusing on the fact that this particular ship’s cargo is coal.”

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) chairman Russell Reichelt says some changes would involve going to an international body.

“Should Australia take moves to change the shipping channels and kinds of reporting the ships are needed to do, it will involve consultation with the International Maritime Organisation, and my colleagues at the maritime safety authority are well represented there,” he said.

“They would be the group to take forward any review of where the ships are going in that region.”

A shipping expert says Australia should push for higher standards among cargo ship crews.

Peter Morris, a former federal Labor transport minister, headed an inquiry into shipping safety in the 1990s. He says the competence of crews is in decline internationally.

“Australia has access and is well regarded at the International Maritime Organisation, the agency that covers this area,” he said.

“Matters can be raised there the same as if there was compulsory pilotage for the inner route, which is what the ship was on.”

Garrett to inspect oil spill ship site

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett will check the status of the bulk coal ship stranded on the Great Barrier Reef off central Queensland with a flight over the area this morning.

Three ships are expected to arrive today to help transfer the remaining 950 tonnes of oil aboard the Shen Neng 1, which hit Douglas Shoal at full speed east of Rockhampton on Saturday.

The Chinese-registered ship ruptured a fuel tank when it ran aground, spilling more than two tonnes of oil into the ocean, but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Greens Leader Bob Brown and Queensland Transport Minister Rachel Nolan have already flown over Douglas Shoal this week.

Authorities say they are well prepared for any leakage when they remove fuel oil from the stricken ship. Booms will be used to contain any spills.

The incident has prompted debate over shipping channels, pilotage and monitoring systems.

The Queensland Government says it has also made preparations on land in case of a spill which could not be contained.

Queensland Transport spokesman Dave Stewart says the risk of fuel leaking from the ship during the process is very low.

“I can say the preparedness – if oil does leave the ship and does move to the beach – is high,” he said.

However, it is expected to be weeks before the ship can be towed off the reef.

‘Ticking time bomb’

The director of the Australian Marine Conservation Society, Darren Kindleysides, says the risk of pollution to the reef will be reduced once the oil is removed.

“As long as the oil stays on the coal carrier it’s like a ticking time-bomb,” he said.

“In terms of reducing the risk to the reef, getting the oil off that vessel as quickly as possible is certainly the way to go.”

However, Mr Kindleysides says that will not be the end of it.

“You’ve still got a ship there grounded, you’re still damaging the habitats in the area and of course you’ve still got all the coal on board,” he said.

But Queensland Resources Council chief executive Michael Roche says the oil is a bigger environmental concern than the coal on board.

“I think the real fear from these sort of events are from the liquid fuels that power the ships rather than the cargo they’re carrying,” he said.

“I think people with other agendas, anti-coal agendas, are focusing on the fact that this particular ship’s cargo is coal.

“The threat to the reef is not the coal, it’s from the oil that all ships carry.”

Reef damage

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) chairman Russell Reichelt says it is likely the coal carrier has caused significant damage to coral.

Mr Reichelt says the ship is essentially excavating the reef and divers will investigate once it is safe.

“The kinds of things our divers will look for will be the anti-fouling paints and anything that might be toxic that’s scraped off the vessel and sitting on the seabed and that’s not uncommon in ship groundings,” he said.

“So we expect there to be some clean-up operations needed after the ship’s removed.”

Mining scholarships for CQ students

Several Central Queensland students have been awarded scholarships to encourage them to take up careers in the mining industry.

The Queensland Resources Council’s Chief Executive Michael Roche says the scholarships help young people move to resources related subjects as a way to address the skills shortage.

The Education Minister Geoff Wilson presented scholarships worth two-thousand-500 dollars to Jessica Murphy from Emerald High School, Chantel Selmanovic from Toolooa High in Gladstone, and Jess White from North Rockhampton High School.

There were also 500 dollar teacher recognition awards presented to students from Leanne Colthup from Moranbah High School, North Rockhampton student Victoria Neilsen, and Shannon Smith from Blackwater High School.

China gas deal to add $14b to Queensland economy

The State Government says a coal seam gas deal will add $14 billion to southern Queensland’s economy over the next decade.

The Queensland Gas Company (QCC) will pipe gas from the Surat Basin in the state’s south to Gladstone in the central region, and then ship to China from 2014.

The deal is hailed by the Federal Government as the biggest liquefied natural gas (LNG) contract in Australian history, with 72 million tonnes of gas to be exported to Asia over the next 20 years.

Geosciences Australia estimates Queensland has enough coal seam gas to power the entire state for more than 1,000 years.

The State Government says it will generate $200 million a year in royalties for Queensland.

The China National Offshore Oil Corporation signed a deal with the British-owned BG Group yesterday.

The deal is subject to environmental approval as well as from the Foreign Investment Review Board.

‘Ready to go’

Queensland Treasurer Andrew Fraser says he is confident the project will clear any hurdles to its approval.

He says work on the 500-kilometre pipeline from the Surat Basin to Gladstone will start this year.

“There’s certainly a range of approval processes that are undertaken in a project this massive, but what this deal means is that as far as the financing of the LNG development goes, this one’s cooked and ready to go,” he said.

But the state Opposition says the Government has to make sure there is appropriate infrastructure for the gas development.

Opposition spokesman Jeff Seeney says the Government should plan ahead.

“It’s not good enough for the Government to do what they’ve done in the past and wait for the infrastructure to become overloaded and then talk about allocating some money,” he said.

“The Government knows these projects are going to happen in central Queensland. They should be allocating some money now.”

‘Enormous’ benefits

Meanwhile, Queensland Resources Council chief executive officer Michael Roche has welcomed the deal.

Mr Roche says it will make Queensland one of the world’s major energy exporters.

“There will be hundreds of millions of dollars in extra royalties … $10 billion a year in revenue and 18,000 jobs,” he said.

Gladstone Ports Corporation chief executive officer Leo Zussino says the potential benefits for the city are enormous.

“It really cements the potential for the LNG industry to actually happen in Gladstone,” he said.

“Obviously what it means is it gives BG enough sale gas to build three production trains, and what we look forward to now is BG getting through their EIS [environment impact statement] process and hopefully us getting through our dredging approvals ”

Mr Zussino says the region will be transformed.

“Subject the environmental approvals being obtained, I have no doubt that Gladstone is going to be converted into one of the most significant LNG production centres in the world,” he said.

Environmental concerns

Queensland Conservation Council spokesman Toby Hutcheon says he is not entirely opposed to a gas deal.

However, Mr Hutcheon says coal and LNG are big polluters but environmental groups could support the idea if the gas replaced coal exports.

“Both of them are fossil fuels,” he said.

“We are not dead-set against it. The gas is cleaner than coal, but we are still exporting coal.

“This proposal will add to global emissions unless it displaces coal. If Queensland wishes to continue to export coal and export gas it’ll do nothing for climate change.”

Royalties concerns

The Federal Member for Maranoa, Bruce Scott, has welcomed the deal but says at least a third of the royalty needs to be spent in the Surat Basin.

“I think whilst the agreement to sell LNG to China is important, there should also be an agreement written with the regional councils and the community so that there’s a guarantee of royalty money coming back to the region,” he said.

Meanwhile, the State Member for Condamine, Ray Hopper, says the Government needs to keep a closer eye on QGC’s mining operations.

The Petroleum and Gas Inspectorate has issued a compliance notice to QGC to inspect its gas wells in the Tara region, west of Toowoomba, for leaks.

Mr Hopper says it should not be left to residents to monitor operations in the region.

“It is amazing that it has to be the people that actually make the complaint come forward,” he said.

“This should have been catered for and monitored right from day dot, because if anything was leaking that could be detrimental to a lot of things and it’s got to be done properly right from the word go.”

Western Downs Regional Mayor Ray Brown in southern Queensland says the Government must not be swayed by the lucrative royalties generated for the new coal seam gas deal.

Councillor Brown has welcomed the deal but says there are still issues about coal seam gas mining that need to be addressed.

“We do have a lot of concerns on the ground, right through from land access to are they addressing the issues of underground water acquifiers, salt issue, gas extraction issues,” he said.

“They’re regulated by the State Government. It’s just to make sure the State Government don’t look at the huge dollar signs.”

- Reporting by Fidelis Rego, Sam Burgess, Francis Tapim

Revised deal good for shareholders, Qld: Arrow chief

Arrow Energy says it is happy with an improved $3.4 billion takeover offer from a joint venture owned by Royal Dutch Shell and PetroChina.

The offer has been raised from $4.45 per share to $4.70, and Arrow says it will recommend shareholders accept it after the offer received the board’s unanimous support.

The deal would also give shareholders a part of a new listed entity, to be called Dart Energy, which would encompass Arrow’s Asian exploration assets, as well as some Australian assets.

Arrow Energy’s chief executive, Nick Davies, says the deal allows Arrow shareholders some immediate profits and continued exposure to the gas sector.

“I think this is an exciting opportunity for Arrow shareholders. It allows them to take a considerable sum off the table, while being able to continue in parallel with the new company which has a diverse and highly prospective asset base,” he told reporters.

He also says he expects the deal will receive Foreign Investment Review Board approval because of the benefits it will bring to Queensland’s gas sector.

“It’s a good deal in terms of having the world’s leading LNG company and one of the world’s top LNG buyers [coming] in to help develop Queensland resources, so I think there’s a lot of significant benefits to be had from that,” he added.

No plan to up coal royalties: Fraser

Queensland Treasurer Andrew Fraser says he has no plans to increase coal royalties in this year’s state budget.

The chief executive of the Queensland Resources Council (QRC), Michael Roche, is urging the Government to honour its election promise not to increases taxes without consultation .

Mr Roche says the industry was stunned by a decision prior to the 2008 budget to increase taxes from 7 per cent to 10 per cent without consulting the resources sector, raising an extra $600 million revenue from the mining industry.

He says mining companies are finding it harder to develop new resources cost effectively.

“It’s important for the Government to not risk killing the goose that lays the golden eggs,” he said.

“Increasingly what I’m seeing is resource companies looking to diversify their risk globally and if Queensland over-reaches itself, we risk the danger of losing that investment capital to projects in other countries.

“If Government is contemplating changes in royalty arrangements, or if they’re contemplating getting into bed with the Federal Government on a new resource tax, first talk to the industry.

“[They must] make sure they understand the potential impacts on industry and then they can make a decision in the full knowledge of those impacts.”

Consultation pledge

But Mr Fraser says the industry will be consulted if the federal tax review, chaired by Dr Ken Henry, recommends royalty changes.

“There is no plan whatsoever to increase the coal royalties,” he said.

“I’m committed always to talking to the Queensland Resources Council but as they well know, this is a matter before the Henry tax review and it’s not a matter I’m about to decide upon,” he said.

“They, like me, haven’t seen the Henry tax review and when we see it, I’m more than happy to talk to them.

“This is a bit of positioning pre-budget by the Resources Council – it happens every year and I think we need to recognise that.”