Woman’s touch can fuel risk-taking behaviour

Washington, May 12 (ANI): A comforting, maternal pat on the back can make a person throw caution to the wind, concludes a new study.

The research has been published online in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

If a female experimenter patted a participant on the back, they”d risk more money than if she just talked to them, or if a man did the patting, the study found.

The researchers think this comes from the way that mothers use touch to make their babies feel secure. When we are infants, we receive a lot of touch from our mothers. This creates a sense of attachment, which makes a baby feel secure. This helps the youngster”s sense of adventure; they”re more willing to take the risks that come with exploring unfamiliar contexts and strange situations.

Jonathan Levav of Columbia University and Jennifer J. Argo of the University of Alberta wanted to know what happens when those babies grow up: Does physical contact also affect how willing adults are to take risks?

Participants were tested to see if they would take risks, such as investing money or taking a gamble. When they started the experiment, they were greeted in different ways: by a female or male experimenter and with a light, comforting touch on the shoulder, a handshake, or no physical contact at all. At the end of the experiment, they also filled out surveys that assessed how secure they felt. The researchers found that participants who were touched felt more secure and took bigger risks than those who weren”t – but only if they were touched by a woman. The effect was stronger for a touch on the back than for a handshake, but went away entirely for participants who were touched by a man.

The results suggest that a woman”s touch works the same on adults as it does on infants: making them feel more secure and more willing to take risks. (ANI)

Children’s copycat behavior is universal

Washington, May 4 (ANI): A particular kind of imitation – overimitation, in which a child copies everything an adult shows them – appears to be a universal human activity, rather than something the children of middle-class parents pick up, claims a new study.

Scientists “have been finding this odd effect where children will copy everything that they see an adult demonstrate to them, even if there are clear or obvious reasons why those actions would be irrelevant,” says psychologist Mark Nielsen, of the University of Queensland in Australia. “It”s something that we know that other primates don”t do.” If a chimpanzee is shown an irrelevant action, they won”t copy it – they”ll skip right to the action that makes something happen.

But it”s not clear that the results found in child psychology research apply to all people, Nielsen says.

This research is usually done with children who live in Western cultures, whose parents are well educated and middle to upper class. And these parents are constantly teaching their children. But parents in indigenous cultures generally don”t spend a lot of time teaching.

“They may slow what they”re doing if the child is watching, but it”s not the kind of active instruction that”s common in Western cultures,” says Nielsen.

So he teamed up with Keyan Tomaselli, an anthropologist at the University of KwaZulu-Natal in Durban, South Africa, who has worked for decades in Bushman communities in southern Africa.

The study is published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

For the experiments, the children were shown how to open a box – but in a complicated way, with impractical actions thrown in. For example, the adult would drag a stick across a box, then use a stick to open the box by pulling on a knob – which is a lot easier if you just use your fingers. Most of the children copied what the adults did, even if they”d been given the opportunity to play with the box first and figure out how it worked. This was just as true for Bushman children as for the Australian children.

But aren”t the children just following the rules of what appears to be a game? “That kind of is the point,” says Nielsen. “Perhaps not a game, but certainly, when I demonstrate the action, it”s purposeful. So from the mind of a child, perhaps there”s a reason why I”m doing this.” This willingness to assume that an action has some unknown purpose, and to copy it, may be part of how humans develop and share culture, he says. “Really, we see these sorts of behaviors as being a core part of developing this human cultural mind, where we”re so motivated to do things like those around us and be like those around us.” (ANI)

A little motivation can improve eyesight

Washington, Apr 30 (ANI): Eyesight markedly improved when people were experimentally induced to believe that they could see especially well, a new study found.

Harvard University psychologist Ellen Langer and her colleagues reported the finding in the April Psychological Science.

The boffins emphasize that such expectations actually enhanced visual clarity, rather than simply making volunteers more alert or motivated to focus on objects.

In the study, “20 men and women who saw a reversed eye chart — arranged so that letters became progressively larger further down the chart, with a giant “E” at the bottom — accurately reported more letters from the smallest two lines than they did when shown a traditional eye chart with the big letters on top. All volunteers had normal eyesight.

These results reflect people”s expectation, based on experience with standard eye charts, that letters are easy to see at the top and become increasingly difficult to distinguish on lower lines, the researchers suggest.

Participants who said they thought that they could improve their eyesight with practice displayed a bigger vision boost on the reversed chart than those who didn”t think improvement was possible, but only for the next-to-smallest line. Both groups did equally well at reading the smallest, topmost line”, reports Discovery News. (ANI)

Blinking eyes indicate a wandering mind

Washington, Apr 30 (ANI): You tend to blink more often when you”re daydreaming or when your mind is wandering off, concludes a new study.

Cognitive neuroscientist Daniel Smilek, of the University of Waterloo, studies how people pay attention — and don”t.

For the new study, he was inspired by brain research that shows, when the mind wanders, the parts of the brain that process external goings-on are less active.

“And we thought, ok, if that”s the case, maybe we”d see that the body would start to do things to prevent the brain from receiving external information,” Smilek says. “The simplest thing that might happen is you might close your eyes more.” So, Smilek and his colleagues, Jonathan S.A. Carriere and J. Allan Cheyne, also of the University of Waterloo, set out to look at how often people blink when their mind wanders.

Fifteen volunteers read a passage from a book on a computer. While they read, a sensor tracked their eye movements, including blinks and what word they were looking at. At random intervals, the computer beeped and the subjects reported whether they”d been paying attention to what they were reading or whether their minds were wandering — which included thinking about earlier parts of the text.

The participants blinked more when their minds were wandering than when they were on task, the team reports in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

“What we suggest is that when you start to mind-wander, you start to gate the information even at the sensory endings — you basically close your eyelid so there”s less information coming into the brain,” says Smilek. (ANI)

How to build a committed workforce?

Washington, April 28 (ANI): Asking workers to reflect on their organisation”s history can help build a committed workforce, according to a new American research.

The study, titled “Company, country, connections: Counterfactual origins increase organizational commitment, patriotism and social investment,” was conducted by researchers from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.

It will be published in a forthcoming issue of Psychological Science.

Author Adam Galinsky, Morris and Alice Kaplan professor of ethics and decision in management, said: “Institutions that can communicate a compelling historical narrative often inspire a special kind of commitment among employees. It is this dedication that directly affects a company”s success and is critical to creating a strong corporate legacy.”

Galinsky, along with Kellogg professors Hal Ersner-Hershfield and Brayden King and Haas professor Laura Kray explored how reflecting counterfactually on an institution”s origins – that is, thinking about “what if” scenarios – can have a bearing on employees” actions and commitment.

Their findings show that when employees are asked to think about an alternative universe where their company did not come into being, they come to see their company”s current circumstance and future trajectory in a more positive light.

This “near-loss” mentality increases their commitment toward the institution and overall morale.

The researchers point to FedEx as an example.

The courier service successfully positions its origin story by leading people to reflect on what would have happened had FedEx founder Fred Smith chosen not to fly to a Las Vegas casino one fateful night in 1973 to help his troubled company meet payroll.

King said: “The result for FedEx is a deep employee appreciation and the recognition by top magazines as one of the best companies to work for.

“The key to generating these sentiments is reminding employees how things could have turned out differently for their company.”

Lead author Ersner-Hershfield said: “Businesses can better position themselves to prosper when they clearly articulate their origin stories to employees.

“In order for companies to effectively communicate their narrative, they should ask themselves whether there were key meetings, events or people during the economic crisis, without which the company”s outlook would have taken a turn for the worse. Focusing on how things could have turned out differently fosters a positive view of the current circumstances among employees and thus generates an increased sense of commitment.”

Ersner-Hershfield added: “Our study demonstrates that this process is a universal one, applying also to countries and personal connections.”

According to Galinsky, these results suggest “that this link is an endemic aspect of the human mind: Ruminating on origin stories and reflecting back on what might have happened rather than what actually took place leads to increased commitment.” (ANI)

Anticipating quick results boosts performance

Washington, Mar 31 (ANI): The more desperate students are to receive their grades, the more they are likely to perform in class, according to a new study.

Psychological scientists Keri L. Kettle and Gerald Haubl of the University of Alberta in Canada wanted to investigate how the timing of expected feedback impacts individuals” performance.

For the experiment, they recruited students enrolled in a class that required each student to give a 4-minute oral presentation.

The presentations were rated by classmates on a scale from 0 (poor) to 10 (excellent) and the average of these ratings formed the presenter”s grade for that part of the course.

Students received an email 1 day, 8 days, or 15 days before their presentation and were invited to participate in this research study. Students agreeing to volunteer in the study were informed when they would receive feedback on their presentation and were asked to predict their grades.

Participating students were randomly assigned to a specific amount of anticipated feedback delay, which ranged from 0 (same day) to 17 days.

It was found that students who were told they would receive feedback quickly on their performance earned higher grades than students who expected feedback at a later time.

In addition, when students expected to receive their grades quickly, they predicted that their performance would be worse than students who were to receive feedback later.

The pattern suggests that anticipating rapid feedback may improve performance because the threat of disappointment is more prominent.

“People do best precisely when their predictions about their own performance are least optimistic,” noted the authors.

Although the experiment took place in a classroom, the authors concluded that these findings “have important practical implications for all individuals who are responsible for mentoring and for evaluating the performance of others.”

The study has been published in Psychological Science. (ANI)

Fast food makes us impatient

Washington, March 26 (ANI): Fast food is not only bad for health, it can trigger impatience and hasty behaviour in people, a new study has found.

The original idea behind fast food is to increase efficiency, allowing people to quickly finish a meal so they can move on to other matters.

Now, researchers at the University of Toronto have found that the mere exposure to fast food and related symbols can make people impatient, increasing preference for time saving products, and reducing willingness to save.

“Fast food represents a culture of time efficiency and instant gratification,” said Chen-Bo Zhong, who co-wrote the paper with colleague Sanford DeVoe.

“The problem is that the goal of saving time gets activated upon exposure to fast food regardless of whether time is a relevant factor in the context,” Bo Zhong added.

In one experiment, the researchers flashed fast food symbols, such as the golden arch of McDonald”s, on a computer screen for a few milliseconds, so quick that participants couldn”t consciously identify what they saw.

They found that this unconscious exposure increased participants” reading speed in a subsequent task compared to those in a control condition, even when there was no advantage to finishing sooner.

In another study, participants who recalled a time when they eat at a food restaurant subsequently preferred time-saving products—such as two-in-one shampoo—over regular products.

A final experiment found people exposed to fast food logos exhibited greater reluctance for saving —choose a smaller immediate payment rather than opting for a much larger delayed payment.

The study is to be published in a forthcoming issue of Psychological Science. (ANI)

Seal romance-related items away to get over split

Washington, Mar 25 (ANI): If you”re finding hard to get over a failed love interest, then here”s something that can help you: stick your disappointment in a box or envelope and you”ll feel better.

According to a study from the Rotman School of Management, the physical act of enclosing materials related to an unpleasant experience, such as a written recollection about it, improves people”s negative feelings towards the event and created psychological closure. Enclosing materials unrelated to the experience did not work as well.

“If you tell people, ”You”ve got to move on,” that doesn”t work,” said Dilip Soman, who holds the Corus Chair in Communication Strategy at the Rotman School and is also a professor of marketing, who co-wrote the paper with colleagues Xiuping Li from the National University of Singapore and Liyuan Wei from City University of Hong Kong.

“What works is when people enclose materials that are relevant to the negative memories they have. It works because people aren”t trying to explicitly control their emotions.”

Prof. Soman believes the findings point to new angles on such things as fast pick-up courier services and pre-paid mortgage deals that relieve people”s sense of debt burden. If people realize that the memory of past events or tasks can be distracting, perhaps there is a market for products and services that can enclose or take away memories of that task.

The paper is to be published in Psychological Science. (ANI)

Happiness lies in earning more than peers!

Washington, March 23 (ANI): The secret to happiness lies in earning more money than your peers, according to a new study.

Christopher Boyce, from the Department of Psychology at the University of Warwick in England, suggests that it does not matter how much wealth people make as long as they are doing better financially than their fellow mates.

We tend to be happy “as long as we”ve got more than the people around us,” Live Science quoted him as saying.

It apparently takes from the concept of “doing better than the Joneses,” which is common among children. For example, a toy gets ditched as soon as a shinier toy in the hands of another child is spotted.

Boyce insists it holds true for adults as well.

He added: “You might buy a new car. But if your neighbor has just bought the very same car, that new car doesn”t seem as good as it once was if you were the only one to have that car.”

The researchers studied the British Household Panel Survey data between 1997 and 2004, in which more than 80,000 participants rated how dissatisfied or satisfied overall.

They compared the subjects” income with various reference groups, including geographical region, gender and education, and age.

It was found that a person”s life satisfaction was primarily linked to the income position within each peer group.

The researchers cited the results to explain why when national economies grow, average happiness levels do not necessarily increase.

Boyce said: “It”s about having more than everyone else, which is why our nations are not increasing in happiness on average.

“Our study underlines concerns regarding the pursuit of economic growth. There are fixed amounts of rank in society – only one individual can be the highest earner.

“Thus, pursuing economic growth, although it remains a key political goal, might not make people any happier.”

The study has been published in a recent online edition of the journal Psychological Science. (ANI)

Happiness lies in earning more than peers!

Washington, March 20 (ANI): The secret to happiness lies in earning more money than your peers, according to a new study.

Christopher Boyce, from the Department of Psychology at the University of Warwick in England, suggests that it does not matter how much wealth people make as long as they are doing better financially than their fellow mates.

We tend to be happy “as long as we”ve got more than the people around us,” Live Science quoted him as saying.

It apparently takes from the concept of “doing better than the Joneses,” which is common among children. For example, a toy gets ditched as soon as a shinier toy in the hands of another child is spotted.

Boyce insists it holds true for adults as well.

He added: “You might buy a new car. But if your neighbor has just bought the very same car, that new car doesn”t seem as good as it once was if you were the only one to have that car.”

The researchers studied the British Household Panel Survey data between 1997 and 2004, in which more than 80,000 participants rated how dissatisfied or satisfied overall.

They compared the subjects” income with various reference groups, including geographical region, gender and education, and age.

It was found that a person”s life satisfaction was primarily linked to the income position within each peer group.

The researchers cited the results to explain why when national economies grow, average happiness levels do not necessarily increase.

Boyce said: “It”s about having more than everyone else, which is why our nations are not increasing in happiness on average.

“Our study underlines concerns regarding the pursuit of economic growth. There are fixed amounts of rank in society – only one individual can be the highest earner.

“Thus, pursuing economic growth, although it remains a key political goal, might not make people any happier.”

The study has been published in a recent online edition of the journal Psychological Science. (ANI)

New study shows some bullies are just the shy type

Washington, March 19 (ANI): People who suffer from social anxiety are usually characterized as shy, inhibitive and submissive. However, a new study suggests that there is a subset of socially anxious people who act out in aggressive, risky ways—and that their behaviour patterns are often misunderstood.

In the new study, psychologists Todd Kashdan and Patrick McKnight at George Mason University found evidence that a subset of adults diagnosed with Social Anxiety Disorder were prone to behaviours such as violence, substance abuse, unprotected sex and other risk-prone actions.

These actions caused positive experiences in the short-term, yet detracted from their quality of life in the longer-term.

“We often miss the underlying problems of people around us. Parents and teachers might think their kid is a bully, acts out and is a behaviour problem because they have a conduct disorder or antisocial tendencies,” Kashdan said.

“However, sometimes when we dive into the motive for their actions, we will find that they show extreme social anxiety and extreme fears of being judged. If social anxiety was the reason for their behaviour, this would suggest an entirely different intervention,” Kashdan added.

The researchers suggest that looking at the underlying cause of extreme behaviour can help us understand the way people interact within society.

“In the adult world, the same can be said for managers, co-workers, romantic partners and friends. It is easy to misunderstand why people are behaving the way we do and far too often we assume that the aggressive, impulsive behaviours are the problem. What we are finding is that for a large minority of people, social anxiety underlies the problem,” Kashdan said.

The researchers suggest that further studies of this subset group can help psychologists better understand and treat the behaviours.

The new research has been published in Current Directions in Psychological Science. (ANI)

How stress influences decision-making

Washington, Sep 16 (ANI): Cognitive stress, such as distraction, could influence the balanced, logical approach to decision making, according to a new study.

Psychologists Jane Raymond and Jennifer L. O’Brien of Bangor University in the UK wanted to investigate how cognitive stress affects rational decision-making.

In the study, participants played a simple gambling game in which they earned money by deciding between stimuli-in this case, two pictures of different faces.

After making a selection, it became immediately clear whether they had won, lost, or broken even.

Each face was always associated with the same outcome throughout this task.

In the next stage of the experiment, the volunteers were shown each face individually and had to indicate whether they had seen those faces before.

Sometimes volunteers were distracted during this task while other times they were not.

The researchers concluded that distractions significantly impact decision-making.

When volunteers were not distracted, they tended to excel at recognizing faces that had been highly predictive of either winning or losing outcomes.

On the other hand, when they were distracted, they only recognized faces that had been associated with winning.

The authors noted that when we are stressed and need to make a decision, we are “more likely to bear in mind things that have been rewarding and to overlook information predicting negative outcomes.”

In other words, the findings have indicated that irrational biases, which favour previous rewards, may guide our behaviour during times of stress.

The study has been reported in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. (ANI)

Bilingual people can’t ‘turn off’ a language entirely

Washington, August 19 (ANI): A new study has shown that bilingual people are not actually capable of “turning off” a language entirely.

Ghent University psychologists Eva Van Assche, Wouter Duyck, Robert Hartsuiker and Kevin Diependaele have found that knowledge of a second language actually has a continuous impact on native-language reading.

For their study, the research team asked 45 Ghent University students, whose native-language was Dutch and secondary language was English, to read several sentences containing control words – plain words in their native-language – and cognates.

Cognates are words that have a similar meaning and form across languages, often descending from the same ancient language; for example, “cold” is a cognate of the German word “kalt” since they both descended from Middle English.

The researchers recorded the students’ eye movements, and observed where their eyes paused (fixation locations), as they read the sentences.

The researchers found that the students looked a shorter period of time at the cognates than at the controls.

According to the psychologists, it is the overlap of the two languages that speeds up the brain’s activation of cognates, which is why despite not needing to use their second language to read in their native-language, the participants still were unable to simply “turn it off.”

Based on their observations, the researchers came to the conclusion that not only is a second language always active, it has a direct impact on reading another language-even when the reader is more proficient in one language than another.

The study has been published in the journal Psychological Science. (ANI)

Gene-brain activity pattern combo behind difficult-to-hush babies

Washington, July 14 (ANI): People finding it difficult to soothe their babies need not worry about their parenting skills anymore, for a new study suggests that children’s temperament may be due in part to a combination of a certain gene and a specific pattern of brain activity.

Writing about their findings in the journal Psychological Science, McMaster University researcher Louis Schmidt points out that the pattern of brain activity in the frontal cortex of the brain has been associated with various types of temperament in children.

He highlights the fact that infants who have more activity in the left frontal cortex are characterized as temperamentally “easy” and are easily calmed down, while those with greater activity in the right half of the frontal cortex are temperamentally “negative” and are easily distressed and more difficult to soothe.

In the current study, he and his colleagues focused on the interaction between brain activity and the DRD4 gene to see whether it predicted children’s temperament.

According to background information in the Psychological Science article, previous studies have linked the longer version of this gene to increased sensory responsiveness, risk-seeking behaviour, and attention problems in children.

In the present study, brain activity was measured in 9-month-old infants through electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. When the children were 48 months old, their mothers completed questionnaires regarding their behaviour and DNA samples were taken from the children for analysis of the DRD4 gene.

Schmidt says that the results reveal interesting relations among brain activity, behaviour, and the DRD4 gene.

He says that among the children with more activity in the left frontal cortex at 9 months, those who had the long version of the DRD4 gene were more soothable at 48 months than those who possessed the shorter version of the gene.

However, he adds, the children with the long version of the DRD4 gene, who had more activity in the right frontal cortex, were the least soothable and exhibited more attention problems compared to the other children.

Schmidt says that these findings suggest that the long version of the DRD4 gene may act as a moderator of children’s temperament.

“(The) results suggest that it is possible that the DRD4 long allele plays different roles (for better and for worse) in child temperament (depending on internal conditions or the environment inside their bodies),” note the authors.

They conclude that the pattern of brain activity-that is, greater activation in left or right frontal cortex-may influence whether this gene is a protective factor or a risk factor for soothability and attention problems.

The authors cautioned that there are likely other factors that interact with these two measures in predicting children’s temperament. (ANI)

Decision-making brain region also deciphers different phonetic sounds

Washington, July 1 (ANI): A collaborative team of researchers from Brown University and the University of Cincinnati have found that a front portion of the brain, which handles decision-making, also helps decipher different phonetic sounds.

Writing about their findings in the journal Psychological Science, the researchers have revealed that this section of the brain is called the left inferior frontal sulcus.

They say that this section treats different pronunciations of the same speech sound-such as a ‘d’ sound-the same way.

The researchers say that in determining this, they have solved a mystery.

MRI studies showed that test subjects reacted to different sounds – ta and da, for example – but appeared to recognize the same sound even when pronounced with slight variations. These five sounds are the same, but the fifth (right) has a slightly different pronunciation.

“No two pronunciations of the same speech sound are exactly alike. Listeners have to figure out whether these two different pronunciations are the same speech sound such as a ‘d’ or two different sounds such as a ‘d’ sound and a ‘t’ sound,” said Emily Myers, assistant professor (research) of cognitive and linguistic sciences at Brown University.

Lead researcher Sheila Blumstein, the Albert D. Mead Professor of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences at Brown, said that the findings provided a window into how the brain processes speech.

“No one has shown before what areas of the brain are involved in these decisions. As human beings we spend much of our lives categorizing the world, and it appears as though we use the same brain areas for language that we use for categorizing non-language things like objects,” said Blumstein.

The research team studied 13 women and five men, ages 19 to 29. All were brought into an MRI scanner at Brown University’s Magnetic Resonance Facility, so that the researchers could measure blood flow in response to different types of stimuli.

Subjects were asked to listen to repetitive syllables in a row as they lay in the scanner. The sounds were derived from recorded, synthesized speech. Initially subjects would hear identical “dah” or “tah” sounds – four in a row – which would reduce brain activity because of the repetition. The fifth sound could be the same or a different sound.

The study showed that the brain signal in the left inferior frontal sulcus changed when the final sound was a different one. But if the final sound was only a different pronunciation of the same sound, the brain’s response remained steady.

According to Myers and Blumstein, the study matters in the bid to understand language and speaking and how the brain is able to understand certain sounds and pronunciations.

“What these results suggest is that [the left inferior frontal sulcus] is a shared resource used for both language and non-language categorization,” Blumbstein said. (ANI)

Sleeping on a complex decision may not help you make the best choice

London, June 20 (ANI): You may not be able to make the best choice if you sleep on a complex decision, say researchers.

Two research groups have challenged the “unconscious thought” theory regarding complex decisions, proposed in 2006 by Ap Dijksterhuis at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, following experiments in which volunteers were showed a series of cars and their attributes on a screen, before being asked to think carefully about choosing the best car, and the other half to solve anagrams-a distraction technique to allow unconscious processing.

That study had shown that people in the anagram group were more likely to choose the cars with the best attributes, leading the researchers to conclude that it is best to leave tough choices to the unconscious thought.

The new research questioned that conclusion, and instead suggested that the volunteers made their decisions when they first viewed the data, based on an immediate gut instinct.

The researchers behind the two studies said that those in the anagram group simply recalled this original decision when asked to choose. However, they added, those in the “thinking” group reconsidered their first impressions while the details of the cars faded from their memory, which led to poorer choices.

“What Dijksterhuis ignored is that people might already decide when they first hear about the cars, and not after thinking about it or solving anagrams,” says psychologist Daniel Lassiter of Ohio University in Athens.

With a view to testing that hypothesis, the researchers repeated Dijksterhuis’s experiment with a twist. The volunteers were aked to memorise the cars’ attributes while viewing them, thus distracting their attention from making an immediate decision.

Lassiter said that incontrast to Dijksterhuis’s experiment, students made better choices when they spent time thinking, rather than solving anagrams.

Writing about the finding in the journal Psychological Science, Lassiter said that that was strong evidence against the idea that unconscious deliberation is superior to conscious decision-making.

Axel Cleeremans from the Free University of Brussels (ULB) in Belgium carried out a very similar experiment to Lassiter, but using apartments instead of cars, and came to the same conclusion.

This second study also saw volunteers being asked to choose as soon as they had viewed the apartment information, with no time for any deliberation.

According to Cleeremans, the decisions made were of the same quality as those made by the volunteers he asked to solve anagrams.

Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness in Berlin, Germany, these findings provide further evidence that unconscious thought does not improve decision quality.

Dijksterhuis, however, maintains that unconscious thought exists, and insists that he has conducted further experiments directly comparing decisions formed after a period of unconscious thought with those based on first impressions only. He says that the experiments have shown the former to be superior.

He intends to submit his new findings for publication.

John-Dylan Haynes of the Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience in Berlin says that the new results show that unconscious thought during anagram solving had no great effect on decision quality.

However, he says, unconscious processing could be important for gut reactions. (ANI)

People By Nature Are Universally Optimistic, Study Shows

Despite calamities from economic recessions, wars and famine to a flu epidemic afflicting the Earth, a new study from the University of Kansas and Gallup indicates that humans are by nature optimistic.

The study, to be presented May 24, 2009, at the annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science in San Francisco, found optimism to be universal and borderless.

Data from the Gallup World Poll drove the findings, with adults in more than 140 countries providing a representative sample of 95 percent of the world’s population. The sample included more than 150,000 adults.

Eighty-nine percent of individuals worldwide expect the next five years to be as good or better than their current life, and 95 percent of individuals expected their life in five years to be as good or better than their life was five years ago.

“These results provide compelling evidence that optimism is a universal phenomenon,” said Matthew Gallagher, a psychology doctoral candidate at the University of Kansas and lead researcher of the study.

At the country level, optimism is highest in Ireland, Brazil, Denmark, and New Zealand and lowest in Zimbabwe, Egypt, Haiti and Bulgaria. The United States ranks number 10 on the list of optimistic countries.

Demographic factors (age and household income) appear to have only modest effects on individual levels of optimism.

Kids as young as 19 months develop cross-dialect skill

Washington, May 07 (ANI): Children as young as 19 months understand different dialects, a skill, which researchers call ‘phonological constancy.’

Everyday, we come across different accents. Even when a speaker of another English dialect pronounces words differently than we do, we are typically able to recognize their words.

Now, psychologist Catherine Best from MARCS Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, along with colleagues from Haskins Laboratories and Wesleyan University, has shed light on the early development of this cross-dialect skill.

In the study, 15- and 19-month-old American toddlers looked at a coloured checkerboard on a monitor in order to hear sets of familiar words or unfamiliar words.

They completed two tests, one with their own American dialect, and the other with a Jamaican English dialect.

The results suggested that phonological constancy is already evident by 19 months of age, but is not yet present at 15 months.

Both ages listened longer to familiar words than to unfamiliar words in the American dialect, indicating they recognize and prefer words they know.

The 15-month-olds failed to show this preference for the Jamaican dialect, suggesting poor recognition of Jamaican-accented words.

However, the 19-month-olds showed the same familiar-word preference in the Jamaican accent as in the American accent, indicating cross-dialect phonological constancy for words.

The researchers said that phonological constancy, along with the complementary ability to differentiate words from similar-sounding words or non-words, “together serve as a solid foundation on which children rapidly build a vocabulary, and later extrapolate from spoken language to the world of reading.”

The study has been described in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. (ANI)

Babies brainier than previously thought

Washington, May 7 (ANI): A new study has confirmed what many mums already believed: their babies are a lot smarter than others may realize.

Although the Northwestern University study was only five months old, it established that babies are amazing little experimenters with innate knowledge.

The study’s cuties indicated through their curious stares that they could differentiate water in a glass from solid blue material that looked very much like water in a similar glass.

“Rather, our research shows that babies are amazing little experimenters with innate knowledge. They’re collecting data all the time,” Susan Hespos said.

Hespos, an assistant professor of psychology at Northwestern, is lead author of the study, which will appear in the May 2009 issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

In a test with one group of infants in the study, a researcher tilted a glass filled with blue water back and forth to emphasize the physical characteristics of the substance inside. Another group of babies looked at a glass filled with a blue solid resembling water, which also was moved back and forth to demonstrate its physical properties.

Next all the infants were presented with test trials that alternated between the liquid or solid being transferred between two glasses.

According to the well-established looking-time test, babies, like adults, look significantly longer at something that is new, unexpected or unpredictable.

The infants who in their first trials observed the blue water in the glass looked significantly longer at the blue solid, compared to the liquid test trials. The longer stares indicated the babies were having an “Aha!” moment, noticing the solid substance’s difference from the liquid. The infants who in their first trials observed the blue solid in the glass showed the opposite pattern. They looked longer at the liquid, compared to the solid test trials.

“As capricious as it may sound, how long a baby looks at something is a strong indicator of what they know. They are looking longer because they detect a change and want to know what is going on,” Hespos added.

The five-month-old infants were able to discriminate a solid from a similar-looking liquid based on movement cues, or on how the substances poured or tumbled out of upended glasses.

In a second experiment, the babies also first saw either liquid or a similar-looking solid in a glass that was tipped back and forth. This time, both groups of infants next witnessed test trials in which a cylindrical pipe was lowered into either the liquid-filled glass or the solid-containing glass.

The outcomes were similar to those of the previous experiment. Infants who first observed the glass with the liquid looked longer in the subsequent test when the pipe was lowered onto the solid. Likewise, the infants who looked at the solid in their first trials stared longer when later the pipe was lowered into the liquid.

The motion cues led to distinct expectations about whether an object would pass through or remain on top of the liquid or solid, the Northwestern researchers noted. (ANI)

Drinkers don’t remember that their minds wander

Washington, May 06 (ANI): A moderate dose of alcohol increases a person’s mind wandering, while at the same time reducing the likelihood of noticing that one’s mind has wandered, according to a new study.

The study offers the first evidence that alcohol disrupts an individual’s ability to realize his or her mind has wandered, suggesting impairment of a psychological state called meta-consciousness.

These findings suggest that distinct processes are responsible for causing a thought to occur, as opposed to allowing its presence to be noticed.

Researchers studied a group of men, half of whom had consumed alcohol and half of whom had been given a placebo.

After 30 minutes, the participants began reading a portion of Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ from a computer screen.

The results revealed that while they were reading the text those who had consumed alcohol were mind-wandering without realizing it about 25 percent of the time-more than double that of those who had not consumed alcohol.

However, as far as ‘catching themselves’ zoning out, those who had been drinking were no more likely to do so than the other group.

Participants in the alcohol group would have had many more opportunities to catch themselves because they zoned out more often-but they did not. They were impaired in their ability to notice their own mind-wandering episodes.

“Researchers have known for a while that alcohol consumption can interfere with our limited-capacity powers of concentration. But this “double-whammy” may explain why alcohol often disrupts efforts to exercise self-control-a process requiring the ability to become aware of one’s current state in order to regulate it,” said University of Pittsburgh professor of psychology Michael Sayette.

The paper is published in this month’s issue of Psychological Science. (ANI)