Argonaut octopuses use shells as flotation devices

Melbourne, May 19 (ANI): Australian researchers have found that unique, free-swimming octopuses called argonauts, use their stunning white shells to remain neutrally buoyant beneath the sea surface.

For the first time, Dr Julian Finn and Dr Mark Norman from Museum Victoria in Melbourne have observed the animals, Argonauta argo, in the wild, in the Sea of Japan.

The research say that females of these rarely-seen octopuses actively fill their shells with air, and then jet down into the water column, where the air compresses as water pressure increases with depth.

This allows argonauts to remain neutrally buoyant at depths of up to 10 metres, with the volume of air in their shells exactly compensating for their weight, they researchers say.

Finn took three female argonauts captured by Japanese fishermen scuba diving in Okidomari Harbour on the western coast of Honshu, and released them at depths of 2-7 metres. Prior to release, the shells were depleted of air.

All three argonauts jetted to the surface and rocked their shells forward to ”gulp” air, which they then sealed in their shells with specially-adapted tentacles.

The argonauts then dived until buoyancy from the trapped, compressed air cancelled their weight.

“To my delight the argonauts immediately put to rest decades of conflicting opinions, demonstrating their expert ability at obtaining and managing surface-acquired air,” ABC Science quoted Finn as saying.

“Female argonauts released with no air in their shells flailed from side-to-side when swimming, struggling to maintain vertical orientation. Argonauts released with ample air in their shells at the water surface displayed no difficulty in diving to depth,” Finn added.

The findings have been reported in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. (ANI)

Mum”s phone call as comforting as a hug during stressful times

Washington, May 12 (ANI): A simple phone call from your mum or a warm hug has often brightened your gloomy moments, and now this has been scientifically proven by a new American research.

The findings of the study, conducted by researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, have appeared in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

Biological anthropologist Leslie Seltzer tested a group of seven- to 12-year-old girls with an impromptu speech and series of math problems in front of a panel of strangers, sending their hearts racing and levels of cortisol – a hormone associated with stress – soaring.

Seth Pollak, psychology professor and director of UW-Madison”s Child Emotion Lab, said: “Facing a challenge like that, being evaluated, raises stress levels for a lot of people.”

Once stressed, one-third of the girls were comforted in person by their mothers – specifically with hugs, an arm around the shoulders and the like.

One-third were left watch an emotion-neutral 75-minute video. The rest were handed a telephone. It was mom on the line, and the effect was dramatic.

Seltzer said: “The children who got to interact with their mothers had virtually the same hormonal response, whether they interacted in person or over the phone.”

The girls” levels of oxytocin, often called the “love hormone” and strongly associated with emotional bonding, rose significantly and the stress-marking cortisol washed away.

Seltzer said: “It was understood that oxytocin release in the context of social bonding usually required physical contact.

“But it”s clear from these results that a mother”s voice can have the same effect as a hug, even if they”re not standing there.”

And the reprieve from stress or anxiety is a lasting one.

Pollak said: “It stays well beyond that stressful task.

“By the time the children go home, they”re still enjoying the benefits of this relief and their cortisol levels are still low.”

The findings square with a “tend and befriend” theory explaining how stress regulation may differ between males and females.

Confronted with a threat, males may be more likely to choose between fight and flight.

A female with offspring in tow or slowed by pregnancy, however, may have to make different choices.

Seltzer said: “You might not be able to run with a child or defend yourself without endangering both of you.”

Instead, Seltzer explained, it might make more sense for a female to create or use a social bond to deal with a stressor – either through touch or soothing vocal communication.

Seltzer said: “Apparently this hormone, oxytocin, reduces stress in females after both types of contact, and in doing so may strengthen bonds between individuals.”

Pollak said: “For years I”ve seen students leaving exams and the first thing they do is pull out their cell phone and make a call.

“I used to think, ”How could those over-attentive, helicopter parents encourage that?” But now? Maybe it”s a quick and dirty way to feel better. It”s not pop psychology or psychobabble.”

He added: “It”s hard to get cortisol up. It”s hard to get oxytocin up.

“That a simple telephone call could have this physiological effect on oxytocin is really exciting.” (ANI)

Climate change, mountain building behind mammal diversity patterns

Washington, May 6 (ANI): A new study suggests patterns of mammal diversity caused by biodiversity gradients arise from interactions between climate change and mountain building.

University of Michigan Assistant Professors John Finarelli and Catherine Badgley said biodiversity gradients are apparent when one travels from the tropics to the poles and sees the diversity of mammals declines with distance from the equator.

Move from lowland to mountains, they said, and you”ll see diversity increases as the landscape becomes more varied.

The researchers said ecologists have proposed various explanations for the biodiversity gradients, often invoking ecological, evolutionary and historical processes.

But research conducted by Finarelli and Badgley suggest the elevational patterns of diversity we see today have appeared, disappeared and reappeared over Earth”s history and that the patterns arise from interactions between climate change and mountain building.

That, said Finarelli, has implications for conservation efforts in the face of modern-day global warming.

“Based on our finding that more complex regions are more sensitive to climate change, threatened areas in mountainous regions should be a particular conservation concern, with respect to human-mediated climate change,” he said.

The finding also highlights the importance of studies that merge the disciplines of paleontology and biogeography, Finarelli said. “By marrying the two subjects, we can gain a better insight into the ecological and evolutionary processes shaping the world around us.”

The research appears in the early online edition of The Proceedings of the Royal Society B. (ANI)

World”s strongest insect revealed

Washington, March 24 (ANI): Scientists have finally achieved success in finding the world”s strongest insect, a species of dung beetle called Onthophagus taurus.

Dr Rob Knell from Queen Mary, University of London and Professor Leigh Simmons from the University of Western Australia discovered the strongest beetle could pull an astonishing 1,141 times its own body weight – the equivalent of a 70kg person lifting 80 tonnes (almost six full double-decker buses).

The researchers also found these insect athletes have to take care of their diet as much as human athletes. Even the strongest beetles were reduced to feeble weaklings when put on a poor diet for a few days.

Dr Knell from Queen Mary”s School of Biological and Chemical Sciences said: “Insects are well known for being able to perform amazing feats of strength…and it”s all on account of their curious sex lives. Female beetles of this species dig tunnels under a dung pat, where males mate with them. If a male enters a tunnel that is already occupied by a rival, they fight by locking horns and try to push each other out.”

Knell and Simmons tested the beetles” ability to resist a rival by measuring how much weight was needed to pull him out of his hole.

Dr Knell said: “Interestingly, some male dung beetles don”t fight over females.

“They are smaller, weaker and don”t have horns like the larger males. Even when we fed them up they didn”t grow stronger, so we know it”s not because they have a poorer diet.

“They did, however, develop substantially bigger testicles for their body size. This suggests they sneak behind the back of the other male, waiting until he”s looking the other way for a chance to mate with the female. Instead of growing super strength to fight for a female, they grow lots more sperm to increase their chances of fertilising her eggs and fathering the next generation.”

The research has appeared in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. (ANI)

Women prefer ‘manly’ men when poor health is their country’s norm

London, March 17 (ANI): Women who live in countries where poor health is the norm prefer more masculine-looking men, a new research has found.

On the hand, women who live in healthier countries prefer more feminine-looking men, according to the study.

Psychologists say their research suggests that masculine men have the greatest appeal for women who live in areas where a strong genetic make-up is critical for survival.

“When women are choosing a mate, they”re weighing up two different things. On the one hand a really attractive, high genetic quality mate will give them very healthy offspring. On the other, there is getting “investment” from a mate – one who”ll be a good dad,” The Guardian quoted Lisa DeBruine, who led the study at Aberdeen University in the UK, as saying.

“Men who are really attractive tend to be able to pursue whatever mating strategy is best for them. They are more likely to prefer short-term relationships. More feminine men tend to be better providers,” she added.

The study of women in 30 countries showed that women were more likely to choose a masculine-looking partner if their country scored low on a health index based on World Health Organisation mortality figures.

On contrary, in countries where people have a longer lifespan, women favoured more feminine-looking men, even though they might not have the healthiest genes available.

DeBruine said: “Certain environmental factors shift the balance when a woman is choosing a mate, and health is one of those. If a woman lives in an environment where there are lots of pathogens and disease, they are more likely to trade off a good investment in favour of better health for their children. In places where health is less of an issue, women are not so willing to do that.”

The study has been published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B. (ANI)

Scientists extract DNA of extinct giant bird from fossil eggs

London, March 10 (ANI): Experts have successfully managed to extract DNA from a 19,000-year-old emu eggshell.

Charlotte Oskam and Michael Bunce, Murdoch University in Perth, Western Australia, were able to isolate mitochondrial DNA from the eggshells of several extinct megafauna, including the giant moa of New Zealand and a 19,000-year-old emu from Australia.

The researchers’ breakthrough also included recovery of DNA from the egg of the elephant bird of Madagascar, New Scientist reported.

The findings will help understand better how ancient bird and reptilian species lived and died, Bunce explained.

Bunce further elaborated how eggshell was the best substance for radiocarbon dating and isotope analysis, which gives information about the environment in which the egg was laid.

Jaime Gongora, an expert in avian genetics, the University of Sydney, said: “It”s a breakthrough. Extracting even a little more DNA is really important with ancient samples.”

Matt Phillips at Australian National University, Canberra, nodded: “Better access to the genetic information of the nuclear genome promises far richer reconstructions of evolutionary history than is currently possible.”

The study has been published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. (ANI)

Biased parrots better at problem-solving than ambidextrous counterparts

London, Sept 2 (ANI): Parrots that are strongly right- or left-footed are better at problem-solving tasks than their ambidextrous counterparts, according to a new study.

Lead researchers Maria Magat and Culum Brown at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia, worked with eight species of Australian parrot, some of which are primarily left-biased – gang-gang cockatoos, for instance, are 100 per cent left-footed – others right-biased and the rest “ambidextrous”.

They studied their side preference by noting which eye they preferred for looking at food.

During the study, the researchers put the birds to various tasks, including foraging for different seeds sprinkled in a tray of pebbles and raising a hanging seed basket up to their beaks using their claws.

They found that the birds that had a strong bias towards using one side or the other were faster at the tasks than species that showed no preference between left or right.

All animals have cerebral lateralisation, meaning that their brains are divided into two hemispheres responsible for processing different tasks.

Strongly lateralised individuals are strongly “handed” – or strongly “footed” in the case of birds.

“Our study shows that strong lateralisation improves problem-solving ability and foraging in birds, which is an evolutionary advantage,” New Scientist quoted Brown as saying.

“It allows each side of the brain to become specialised at different tasks, so, for instance, the right side of the parrot’s brain can process foraging tasks without being slowed by interference from the left side of the brain,” the expert added.

The study appears in Proceedings of the Royal Society. (ANI)

Males’ sperm travel faster when females are attractive

Melbourne, July 10 (ANI): A new piece of research on red junglefowl, an ancestor of chickens, has shown that males can adjust the speed and effectiveness of their sperm, based on whether they find their mate attractive.

Published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the study adds to the growing body of evidence that males from promiscuous species, including humans, increase the chances of fertilisation when the female is deemed to be attractive.

“Female attractiveness is determined by the expression of a sexual ornament – the comb – which is phenotypically and genetically correlated to the number and mass of eggs females lay,” ABC Science quoted co-authors Dr. Charlie Cornwallis, of the University of Oxford, and Dr Emily O’Connor, of the Royal Veterinary College, as saying.

For their study, the researchers collected natural ejaculates from dominate and subordinate red junglefowl males housed at the University of Stockholm.

They reveal that the males had either just mated with attractive or unattractive females.

The researchers later separated the sperm from the seminal fluid, and analysed the quantity and characteristics of both.

“There was a strong relationship between sperm velocity and the volume of the ejaculate sperm came from,” write Cornwallis and O’Connor, adding that males allocated “larger ejaculates to attractive females”.

Although the researchers have yet to unravel the mystery behind it, they have an have an intriguing theory.

“Males may alter the velocity of sperm they allocate to copulations by strategically firing their left and right ejaculatory ducts, which can operate independently,” they say.

Thus, according to them, stimulation from sexy, attractive females leads to the double firing.

“Furthermore, differential firing of left and right ejaculatory ducts may contribute to how males strategically change the number of sperm in their ejaculates, a phenomenon that is widespread, but for which the mechanism remains unknown,” they say.

The researchers now hope that future studies will better identify how males adjust the sperm and seminal fluid in their ejaculates, and how this affects fertility rates. (ANI)

Crying baby monkeys irk everyone around

Washington, June 29 (ANI): A study on rhesus monkeys conducted by led by researchers at Roehampton University in London has shown that crying babies often get on everyone’s nerves, sometimes leading to nasty consequences.

Stuart Semple, an anthropologist at the university, recently observed that dominant monkeys were not shy about showing anger by chasing, pushing, hitting, or biting a mother and her youngster that were not family.

He and his two colleagues observed this hostile behaviour in wild rhesus monkeys in Puerto Rico, reports Live Science.

They say that bystanders were about 35 times more likely to attack both mother and infant when the baby was crying than when it was hushed.

The researchers also observed that when dominant bystanders were nearby, mothers would acquiesce to their babies’ demands about twice as often as when they were alone or in the company of close relatives, which were more forgiving of tantrums.

This is the first time that any study has shown that, much like humans, monkeys are aware of the social consequences of not only their own actions, but those of their babies, too.

A research article on this study has been published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. (ANI)

Homing pigeons’ inbuilt ‘satnav’ that uses Earth’s magnetic field helps them return home

London, June 24 (ANI): Homing pigeons have fascinated humans for many years through their uncanny ability to find their way home from thousands of miles away. Now, researchers claim to have found the reason behind it.

Scientists researchers from the University of Auckland in New Zealand said that the birds have inbuilt ‘satnav’ that uses Earth’s magnetic field to pinpoint position and help them find their way home.

Researchers have discovered that like global positioning technology, they first determine where they are before heading off for home, reports The Telegraph.

In the study, which has been published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, boffins discovered that the initial flight path involves finding the magnetic waves which can then be used to find their way home.

In order to reach the conclusion, researchers reviewed a number of studies in Germany that saw as many 150 birds returning to three lofts near Frankfurt.

Dr Cordula Mora and her colleagues concluded that “respond to the Earth’s magnetic field at the release site”, calculate their position using the fields and then calculate their way home.

“Our results imply that pigeons use the earth’s magnetic field for determining their position at the release site before laying a course for home,” she said. (ANI)

Like humans, monkeys too are adept in the art of deceiving

London, June 19 (ANI): Intentional deceit is not just restricted to humans, monkeys too can con others in order to get food, says a new study.

According to Federica Amici and colleagues of Liverpool John Moores University in the UK, some monkeys use simple forms of deceit.

To reach the conclusion, researchers put up to 10 monkeys from different primate species through the same experiment, reports New Scientist.

Spider monkeys, brown capuchins and long-tailed macaques were shown how to access food that was out of reach. Then, they were caged with a socially higher-ranking monkey from the same species.

Dominant monkeys in all three species would normally have priority over food, but in this case they did not know how to get to it.

When their dominant partner was not around subordinate monkeys of all species went straight for the food. But as soon as the dominant monkey was introduced, they held back. he best deceivers turned out to be the macaques, which have a very strict social structure.

“The point [of deceit] is to withhold information in a constructive way, to eventually get the food yourself,” says Filippo Aureli also of John Moores University.

“The subordinate long-tailed macaques almost never got the food,” says Aureli.

In case of spider monkeys, the strategy worked. Subordinates waited until the dominant monkey was on the other side of the cage before going for the food and ultimately ate more than the subordinates of two other species.

Aureli and Amici believe this is because spider monkey social structure is both tolerant and fluid.

The study has been published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B. (ANI)

Quiet guys in the corner, not flashy ones, score more with females

Washington, June 19 (ANI): Being heavily focused on keeping up appearance might serve as a successful “advertisement” for attracting mates, however, in some species, like stickleback fish, it’s the caring ones who score.

Yale scientists theorize that when males must provide care for the survival of their offspring, the males’ signals will consistently be honest – and they may devote more of their energy to caring for their offspring than to being attractive.

The idea that males showcase their best qualities to attract females for mating isn’t a new one, nor is the idea that they might be deceptive in what they are promoting.
nstead, the new findings better predict the requirement for honesty in advertising as a function of the male’s suitability for parenting, according to Natasha Kelly, a graduate student in ecology and evolutionary biology at Yale and lead author of the study.

When a male’s energy is heavily focused on keeping up his appearance, he may have little energy to devote to caring for offspring. But that may be okay, say the researchers – in species where he does not really need to tend to the kids.

However, the new model, now appearing in the online version of the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, examines the reliability of males’ mating signals when they must care for offspring.

There are many species in which males could, but do not have to, provide parental care – because females will pick up the slack. The Yale researchers focused on those species, like stickleback fish, where females cannot pick up the slack and males who do not provide care risk the survival of their offspring.

“This new work shows that when males can not escape the cost of failing to provide care, their advertisements will tend to tend to reliably indicate how much care they will provide,” said senior author Suzanne Alonzo, assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at Yale.

“The qualifier in this case is where males are obligated to provide care,” said Kelly.

“In that case, the quiet guy in the corner might be giving the more reliable advertisement for fatherhood,” the expert added. (ANI)

Birds sing well even when exposed to bad tutors

Washington, May 28 (ANI): A new study by German researchers has revealed that male canaries sing well even when they are exposed to tutors lacking basic features of the song of their species.

The learning of birdsong is similar to speech learning in humans. Acoustic perception and the ability to produce sound are crucial for the process.

Social isolation leads to a disturbed vocal development both in humans and in birds. When kids grow up without contact with other humans, they either develop no or a rudimentary form of human language.

A similar scenario occurs in songbirds when juveniles are removed from their parents and are raised apart. Although these birds develop song, it usually contains abnormalities.

Whether the descendants of such birds accept these abnormal songs of their parents as a song model was investigated by researchers Sandra Belzner and Stefan Leitner from the Max Planck Institute for Ornithology in Seewiesen, Germany, on domesticated canaries.

For the study, the researchers established a group of ‘poor’ singing tutors by raising young canaries in isolation from adult males but in contact with peers and females.

When these poor singers later on sired offspring, the adult males were removed only after juveniles had reached the age of 60-70 days and thus had started song development already.

Detailed song analysis showed that the juveniles did not simply copy the bad songs of their tutors, but rather developed a version that resembled more the song of normal canaries.

“Apparently these birds possess an innate template for species-specific song that needs to be activated by hearing song,” said Cornelia Voigt, study co-author.

When the researchers introduced the male offspring in their second year to normally singing canary males, they found that their songs did not contain any changes.

These findings were published in an online edition of the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. (ANI)

Long, sexy tails don’t sap male hummingbirds’ energy reserves

Washington, Mar 13 (ANI): The long tails sported by male birds in the tropics are often considered a distinct disadvantage because they lead to as much as a 50 percent greater energy loss when flying. Now, however, a new study has shown that they exact only a minimal cost in speed or energy.

University of California, Berkeley biologists have found long tails exact leads to a minimal cost in speed or energy – at least in hummingbirds.

“We estimate that having a long tail increases a bird’s daily metabolic costs by 1 to 3 percent, which means the bird has to visit 1 to 3 percent more flowers in its territory,” said Christopher J. Clark, a graduate student in UC Berkeley’s Department of Integrative Biology.

“Is that a lot? It’s hard to say, but we argue that it’s not, especially when compared to the costs of things like molting and migration,” he added.

During the study, Clark outfitted short-tailed Anna’s hummingbirds (Calypte anna) with long tail feathers from a red-billed streamertail (Trochilus polytmus), giving the hummingbirds two tail feathers that were five times the normal length.

They found that the hummingbirds with enhanced tail feathers suffered only a 3.4 percent drop in their maximum speed. This corresponded to an 11 percent increase in energy needed to fly at high speeds.

For moderate and low speeds – the speeds at which hummingbirds typically flit from flower to flower and hover the long-tailed birds expended considerably less extra energy.

“I think that in most birds with long tails, the long tail is not costly,” said Clark.

“The energetic costs of a long tail are not high, but it remains to be seen if there are any benefits of a long tail, other than the indirect benefit of helping to pass on one’s genes,” he added.

The study is published in Proceedings of the Royal Society. (ANI)

Apes can’t recognise own faces in mirror

London, Feb 26 (ANI): Unlike chimpanzees, orang-utans and gorillas, apes do not recognise their own face in a mirror, a new study has found.

According to scientists, the lack of self-recognition in gibbons and other lesser apes indicates that the mental capacity emerged 14 to 18 million years ago when their evolutionary lineage split from great apes, reports New Scientist.

“We can reason about the mind of an ancestor without even laying eyes on the fossil,” says Thomas Suddendorf, a psychologist at the University of Queensland, Australia, who led the study.

Earlier studies had suggested that gibbons don’t recognise their own mug, but those studies examined only a handful of animals of just one species of gibbon, Suddendorf said.

To put an end to the speculation, he and colleague Emma Collier-Baker studied 17 different captive gibbons belonging to three out of the four existing genera.

The research team tested self-recognition by first letting the gibbons lick tasty cake icing off their own limbs. They then painted a stripe of the same colour down the apes’ faces.

With at least five hours in front of a large mirror in their enclosure, gibbons did examine the reflection and touch the glass, yet none used it to inspect whether the stripe might offer a further treat. Sometimes they even tried to reach around the mirror as if to touch a gibbon on the other side.

One ape discovered the mark while scratching, but paid no more attention to it after he returned to the mirror.

According to Suddendorf, apes didn’t seem to have an idea that there is what looks like icing on their own face.

“This is a nice, very detailed study, but confirms what we thought already, which is that these animals don’t have mirror self-recognition,” says Frans de Waal, a primatologist at Yerkes Primates Center and Emory University in Atlanta, US.

The study has been published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B. (ANI)

Scientists identify ‘happiness’ gene

London, Feb 25 (ANI): If life looks joyful in spite of recession, job insecurity and expanding waistline, then you should consider thanking your “brightside” gene.

A gene that affects if we’re cheery or gloomy has been tracked down by British researchers, reports The Guardian.

The groundbreaking study claims that individuals who carry the gene don’t pay much attention to negative things happening In their lives and, instead, focus on the happier aspects of life. In the process, they end up becoming more sociable and are generally in better shape psychologically.

Elaine Fox, head of psychology at Essex University, said: “We’ve shown for the first time that a genetic variation is linked with a tendency to look on the bright side of life. This is a key mechanism underlying resilience to general life stress.”

To reach the conclusion, the research team checked how long it took people to react to good and bad images that flashed up on a computer screen.

The study involved more than 100 volunteers.

The positive snaps were that of a couple hugging and someone sailing along in a boat. The negative images included a photo of someone being mugged.

Volunteers’ genetic tests revealed that a tendency to ignore negative images and dwell on the positive ones was strongly linked to a variation in a gene that controls serotonin, which also branded as the brain’s main “feel-good” chemical.

Every individual inherits two versions of the gene, either two short ones, two long ones, or one of each. People who had two longs versions were most likely to focus on the positives, according to the study published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B. (ANI)