Sudan deal collapse could spark faith war: Jimmy Carter

(Reuters) – A collapse of Sudan’s elections and a related peace deal could spark a national and regional religious war, former President Jimmy Carter said as he observed the first day of voting on Sunday.

World

Sudanese voters queued up to take part in the oil-producing state’s first full multi-party ballot in 24 years, a poll promised in the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement that ended Sudan’s two-decade north-south civil war.

Carter, in Khartoum to lead a team of elections observers, told Reuters it was important Sudan got through its elections peacefully because of the country’s strategic position in the region — and the importance of the peace accord.

“I think if some violence or disruption occurs here in Sudan it might very well spill over into a large part of Africa,” he said in an interview in a hotel on the banks of the river Nile.

“There’s a potential alignment of support or animosity between and Islamic north and a non-Islamic south, with some of the adjacent countries being deeply committed to Christianity and others not. It could lead to a potential religious conflict as well as a regional conflict in this part of Africa.”

Asked what specifically could trigger such a conflict, Carter answered: “I think a breakdown in the entire electoral process that results in violence on both sides … I would say that that could happen only if the process envisioned in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement was disrupted completely which I certainly do not anticipate.”

NINE NEIGHBOURS

Sudan, Africa’s largest country, has nine neighbors including predominantly Muslim Egypt, Libya and Chad to its north and east, and Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia to its south and west, all with large Christian population.

An estimated 2 million people died in Sudan’s civil war, which pitched the mostly Muslim north against rebels from the south where most follow Christianity and traditional beliefs.

Sudan’s electoral process and the linked peace accord have come under strain in recent weeks. North-south distrust remains deep and both sides’ armies have clashed since the 2005 deal.

Incumbent President Omar Hassan al-Bashir last month threatened to pull the plug on a referendum on southern independence promised under the same 2005 peace deal if the south’s former rebel Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) refused to take part in the elections.

At the time, the SPLM and a loose coalition of opposition parties were threatening to boycott the elections in protest over fraud accusations. The SPLM eventually only went ahead with a partial boycott.

Analysts have warned there is a risk of return to conflict if Khartoum does anything to disrupt the south’s prized referendum. Southerners are widely thought to want independence.

Carter said his observers had reported some delays and difficulties in polling stations across Sudan, but he was encouraged by what he had seen in Khartoum on Sunday morning.

“It is quite good … no violence, no intimidation, no effort to disrupt the orderly process of the election.”

He criticized Bashir for making two speeches in which the Sudanese president threatened to expel and chop the fingers off observers who called for a delay in elections. Carter Center observers had said a short delay might be necessary.

“It was a serous mistake on his part.” He said Bashir’s aides had since assured him the threats were made in the heat of a campaign speech, and that Bashir himself welcomed the Carter mission in a subsequent address.

(Editing by Giles Elgood)

Jimmy Carter ‘hopeful’ on Sudan elections

Former United States president Jimmy Carter says he hopes today’s election in Sudan will be free and fair.

His organisation, the Carter Centre, is monitoring the poll.

The landmark poll – Sudan’s first multi-party election in 24 years – is being marred by opposition boycotts and Western criticism.

But speaking in Khartoum, Mr Carter said he hoped the elections would live up to international standards:

“I’ve talked with all the other party leaders about the election and preparations for it,” he said.

“I hope that it will be safe and free and fair, and that the decisions of individual voters will be expressed freely without intimidation as they cast their ballot, and that … the election be tabulated honestly and fairly.”

TIMELINE: U.S.-Israeli relations since 1948

(Reuters) – Israel’s ambassador to the United States was quoted on Monday as saying that U.S.-Israeli relations were in a “crisis of historic proportions” because of a dispute over Jerusalem settlement plans.

World | Barack Obama

Here are some milestones in Israel-U.S. relations:

1948 – President Harry Truman becomes the first world leader to recognize the newly-born Israel.

1956 – Furious at Israel’s capture of the Sinai Peninsula and Gaza Strip from Egypt in a campaign with France and Britain, President Dwight Eisenhower threatens to suspend vital U.S. financial aid to Israel unless it withdraws.

1967 – The United States stands behind Israel in the Six-Day War with surrounding Arab states, but relations are clouded by Israel’s attack in international waters on the Liberty, a U.S. spy ship. Thirty-four American seamen are killed and 174 wounded.

1973 – President Richard Nixon rushes to Israel’s aid with an airlift of military hardware after Egypt and Syria, which lost territory in the 1967 conflict, launch the Yom Kippur war.

1975 – The U.S. administration of President Gerald Ford threatens to reappraise U.S. ties with Israel unless it signs a “disengagement” treaty with Egypt to pull back from the Sinai peninsula, captured in 1967.

1979 – President Jimmy Carter hosts signing of peace treaty between Israel and Egypt, concluded in talks at Camp David.

1981 – U.S. condemns Israel’s bombing of Iraq’s nuclear reactor at Osirak.

1982 – In a telephone call to Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, President Ronald Reagan expresses what a spokesman calls “outrage” over Israeli bombing raids in Beirut during a war in Lebanon, and pressures him into a ceasefire.

1990 – Secretary of State James Baker says U.S. growing weary of Israeli foot-dragging over peace negotiations with the Palestinians and recites White House telephone number, urging both sides “to call us when you are serious about peace”.

1991 – President George Bush Sr. pressures Israel to stay out of first Gulf War, concerned that an Israeli attack on Iraq would cause a U.S.-led coalition to disintegrate.

1993 – President Bill Clinton hosts, on the White House lawn, a handshake between Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat at the signing of a Declaration of Principles on interim Palestinian self-government.

1994 – Clinton witnesses the signing of a peace treaty between Israel and Jordan.

1995 – Clinton wins Israeli hearts in tearful eulogy at funeral of assassinated Rabin, saying in Hebrew “shalom haver”, or “goodbye friend”.

1998 – Clinton hosts summit between Arafat and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Wye River, Maryland. Netanyahu agrees to hand over more occupied land to Palestinian control, including part of the West Bank city of Hebron.

2000 – Clinton hosts Israel-Syria talks in Shepherdstown, West Virginia. Negotiations end in stalemate.

2003 – President George W. Bush announces “road map” peace plan, three years after start of Palestinian uprising, setting an outline for end to violence and return to statehood talks.

2003 – Bush sides with Israel in attempting to sideline Arafat, saying Palestinians are being “betrayed by leaders who cling to power by feeding old hatreds and destroying the good work of others”.

2004 – Bush writes in letter to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon that “existing major Israeli population centers” — an indirect reference to Jewish settlement enclaves in the West Bank — make it “unrealistic” to expect Israel to return to armistice lines drawn in 1949.

2009 – Bush tells Israel’s parliament in a speech that the unbreakable bond between Israel and the U.S. runs deeper than any treaty and is grounded in the shared link to the Bible.

2010 – President Barack Obama’s administration is furious with Israel for announcing the building of more settler homes around Jerusalem during a visit by Vice President Joe Biden. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton calls the move an “insult”.

(Writing by Ori Lewis; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

High court weighs anti-terror material support law

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court struggled Tuesday to balance the constitutional rights of humanitarian aid groups with the government’s efforts to combat terrorism.

The issue arose in a challenge by aid groups and individuals to parts of a key anti-terror law that bans “material support” to foreign terrorist organizations, even when that support consists of training and advice about entirely peaceful and legal activities.

The aid groups involved had trained a group in Turkey on how to bring human rights complaints to the United Nations and assisted them in peace negotiations, but suspended the activities when the U.S. designated the Turkish outfit a terrorist organization in 1997. They also wanted give similar help to a group in Sri Lanka, but it, too, was designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. in 1997.

Several justices seemed unsure how to resolve a dispute in which they acknowledged legitimate points on both sides. It is the court’s first look at a terrorism-related criminal law since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

“This is a difficult case for me,” declared Justice Anthony Kennedy, who often provides the decisive vote that delivers a court majority.

The humanitarian groups, backed in this case by former President Jimmy Carter, say the law makes a crime out of speech _ in violation of the Constitution. “The government has spent a decade arguing that our clients cannot advocate for peace,” David Cole, the lawyer for the aid groups and individuals, told the court.

The administration urged the court to reject the challenge. Any aid to terrorist groups “strengthens them in everything they do,” Solicitor General Elena Kagan said. Kagan emphasized the material support law’s importance, calling it a “vital weapon” in combating terrorism.

The argument took place a day after 25-year-old Najibullah Zazi pleaded guilty in New York to providing material support to al-Qaida, among other charges, as part of a plan to attack the New York subway.

Nearly four dozen organizations are on the State Department list, including al-Qaida, Hamas, Hezbollah, Basque separatists in Spain and Maoist rebels in Peru.

The humanitarian groups, including the Humanitarian Law Project; Ralph Fertig, a civil rights lawyer; and Dr. Nagalingam Jeyalingam, a physician, want to offer assistance to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party in Turkey or the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam in Sri Lanka.

The government says the Kurdish rebel group, known as the PKK, has been involved in a violent insurgency that has claimed 22,000 lives. The Tamil Tigers waged a civil war for more than 30 years before their defeat last year.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor was among those who suggested the law could be too broad.

“Under the definition of this statute, teaching these members to play the harmonica would be unlawful,” Sotomayor said.

Kagan replied, “The first thing I would say is there are not a whole lot of people going around trying to teach al-Qaida how to play harmonicas.”

Justice Antonin Scalia, who seemed most receptive to the government’s argument, interjected: “Well, Mohamed Atta and his harmonica quartet might tour the country and make a lot of money. Right?”

Scalia was referring to the lead Sept. 11 hijacker.

Supporters of the aid groups have invoked the specter of McCarthyism in a law they say subjects U.S. citizens to prison merely for speech.

Former President Carter, whose Carter Center seeks to mediate international disputes, said the law threatens the work of groups that share the government’s goal of ending terrorism.

“Our work to end violence sometimes requires interacting directly with groups that have engaged in it,” Carter said in a written statement.

On the other side, the Anti-Defamation League said the law is a reasonable approach to fighting terrorism that does not infringe on constitutional rights.

The administration, defending a law that has been on the books since 1996 and modified twice since then, said there is no limit on speech because people can say whatever they want in support of terrorist groups and even may, in one example Kagan batted around with Kennedy, call on a group to lay down its arms.

But that advice crosses the line into illegal activity when it becomes a manual on how to approach the United Nations and lobby for aid, Kagan said.

The reason for this, she said, is “you’ve given them an extremely valuable skill that they can use for all kinds of purposes, legal or illegal.”

The court is expected to issue its decision by late June.

The cases are Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 08-1498, and Humanitarian Law Project v. Holder, 09-89.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Some Americans think opposition to Obama’s policies is based on racism

Washington, Sep. 18 (ANI): Some Americans, including former President Jimmy Carter, believe that those who are opposing US President Barrack Obama’s policies have a racial element against him instead of simple disagreement.

According to a recent Fox News poll, 65 percent Americans think that opposition to Obama’s policies is based on honest disagreements, while 20 percent say it is mostly motivated by racism.

However, Black voters are twice as likely to say the opposition is motivated by race, with 63 percent citing racism as the reason for opposition and 27 percent say it is based on honest disagreements.

Most white voters (71 percent) say the opposition comes from honest disagreements.

Most Republicans (87 percent) and independents (69 percent) believe that opposition to Obama’s policies is based on honest disagreements, while 48 percent Democrats say honest disagreements and 34 percent say it is motivated by racism, the poll found.

Opinion Dynamics Corp. conducted the national telephone poll of 900 registered voters with a 3-point margin of error.

The poll also found that 54 percent of Americans think Obama is a “new kind” of politician, while a large 39 percent minority says he is a “typical” politician.

As for Obama’s handling of health care, 44 percent approved and 48 percent disapproved.

Obama received better ratings on his handling of the economy (55 percent approve) and on the war in Afghanistan (51 percent).

By a wide 60 percent to 27 percent margin, Americans think the country has become more divided rather than more united since Obama took office in January, the poll found. (ANI)

Carter says Republican lawmaker’s outburst against Obama was racist in tone

Washington, Sep.16 (ANI): Former US President Jimmy Carter has said Republican representative Joe Wilson’s outburst to President Barack Obama during a speech to Congress last week was an act “based on racism” and rooted in fears of a black president.

“I think it’s based on racism,” the Daily Express quoted Carter, as saying.

“There is an inherent feeling among many in this country that an African-American should not be president,” he added.

“Those kind of things are not just casual outcomes of a sincere debate on whether we should have a national programme on health care. It’s deeper than that,” Carter said.

Wilson, from South Carolina, was formally rebuked on Tuesday in a House vote for shouting “You lie!” during Obama’s speech to Congress last Wednesday.

The shout came after the president commented that illegal aliens would be ineligible for federal subsidies to buy health insurance. Republicans expressed their disbelief with sounds of disapproval, punctuated by Wilson’s outburst.

The rebuke was a rare resolution of disapproval pushed through by Democrats who insisted that Wilson had violated basic rules of decorum and civility.

Republicans characterized the measure as a witch-hunt, though Wilson had already apologised to Obama. The GOP is insisting that he owed the House no apology. (ANI)

Ted Kennedy dies of brain cancer aged 77

Massachusetts (US), Aug, 26 (ANI): Senator. Edward Kennedy, the patriarch of the first family of Democratic politics, died late Tuesday at his home in Hyannis Port, Massachusetts, after a lengthy battle with brain cancer. He was 77.

“We’ve lost the irreplaceable center of our family and joyous light in our lives, but the inspiration of his faith, optimism and perseverance will live on in our hearts forever,” a family statement said.

“We thank everyone who gave him care and support over this last year, and everyone who stood with him for so many years in his tireless march for progress toward justice,” CNN quoted the statement as saying further.

Kennedy, nicknamed “Ted,” was the younger brother of slain President John F. Kennedy and New York Senator Robert Kennedy, who was gunned down while seeking the White House in 1968.

However, his own presidential aspirations were hobbled by the controversy around a 1969 auto accident that left a young woman dead, and a 1980 primary challenge to then-President Jimmy Carter that ended in defeat.

The longtime Massachusetts senator was considered one of the most effective legislators of the past few decades.

Kennedy, who was known as the “Lion of the Senate,” played major roles in passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act and the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act, and was an outspoken liberal standard-bearer during a conservative-dominated era from the 1980s to the early 2000s.

Kennedy recently urged Massachusetts officials to change a law to allow for an immediate temporary replacement should a vacancy occur for one of his state’s two Senate seats. Under a 2004 Massachusetts law, a special election must be held 145 to 160 days after a Senate seat becomes vacant. The winner of the election would serve the remainder of a senator’s unexpired term.

Kennedy asked Governor Deval Patrick and state leaders to “amend the law through the normal legislative process to provide for a temporary gubernatorial appointment until the special election occurs,” according to the letter, dated July 2.

Kennedy suffered a seizure in May 2008 at his home on Cape Cod. Shortly after, doctors diagnosed a brain tumor-a malignant glioma in his left parietal lobe.

Surgeons at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, removed as much of the tumor as possible the following month. Doctors considered the procedure a success, and Kennedy underwent follow-up radiation treatments and chemotherapy.

A few weeks later, he participated in a key vote in the Senate. He also insisted on making a brief but dramatic appearance at the 2008 Democratic convention, a poignant moment that brought the crowd to its feet and tears to many eyes.

“I have come here tonight to stand with you to change America, to restore its future, to rise to our best ideals and to elect Barack Obama president of the United States,” Kennedy told fellow Democrats in a strong voice.

Kennedy’s early support for Obama was considered a boon for the candidate, then a first-term senator from Illinois locked in a tough primary battle against former first lady Hillary Clinton.

Kennedy predicted Obama’s victory and pledged to be in Washington in January when Obama assumed office-and he was, though he was hospitalized briefly after suffering a seizure during a post-inaugural luncheon.

Kennedy was one of only six senators in U.S. history to serve more than 40 years. He was elected to eight full terms to become the second most-senior senator after West Virginia Democrat Robert Byrd.

He launched his political career in 1962, when he was elected to finish the unexpired Senate term of his brother, who became president in 1960. He won his first full term in 1964.

He seemed to have a bright political future, and many Democratic eyes turned to him after the killings of his brothers. But a July 18, 1969, car wreck on Chappaquiddick Island virtually ended his ambitions.

After a party for women who had worked on his brother Robert’s presidential campaign, Kennedy drove his car off a bridge on Chappaquiddick, off Cape Cod and across a narrow channel from Martha’s Vineyard. While Kennedy managed to escape, his passenger, Mary Jo Kopechne, drowned.

In a coroner’s inquest, he denied having been drunk, and said he made “seven or eight” attempts to save Kopechne before exhaustion forced him to shore. Although he sought help from friends at the party, Kennedy did not report the accident to police until the following morning.

Kennedy eventually pleaded guilty to leaving the scene of an accident. In a televised address to residents of his home state, Kennedy called his conduct in the hours following the accident “inexplicable” and called his failure to report the wreck immediately “indefensible.”

Despite the dent in his reputation and career, Kennedy remained in American politics and went on to win seven more terms in the Senate.

Kennedy championed social causes and was the author of “In Critical Condition: The Crisis in America’s Health Care.” He served as chairman of the Judiciary and Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committees and was the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary and Armed Services committees during periods when Republicans controlled the chamber.

Obama named Kennedy as one of 16 recipients of the 2009 Presidential Medal of Freedom, America’s highest civilian honor. A White House statement explained that the 2009 honorees “were chosen for their work as agents of change.”

Born in Boston on February 22, 1932, Edward Moore Kennedy was the last of nine children of Joseph P. Kennedy, a prominent businessman and Democrat, and Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy.

Joseph Kennedy pushed his sons to strive for the presidency, a burden “Teddy” bore for much of his life as the only surviving Kennedy son.

His oldest brother, Joe Jr., died in a plane crash during World War II when Kennedy was 12. John was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, in 1963, and Robert was killed the night of the California primary in 1968.

Ted Kennedy delivered Robert’s eulogy, urging mourners to remember him as “a good and decent man who saw wrong and tried to right it; who saw suffering and tried to heal it; who saw war and tried to stop it.”

The family was plagued with other tragedies as well. One sister, Kathleen, was killed in a plane crash in 1948. Another sister, Rosemary, was born mildly retarded, but was institutionalized after a botched lobotomy in 1941. She died in 1986 after more than 50 years in mental hospitals.

Joseph Kennedy was incapacitated by a stroke in 1961 and died in November 1969, leaving the youngest son as head of the family. He was 37.

“I can’t let go,” Kennedy once told an aide. “If I let go, Ethel (Robert’s widow) will let go, and my mother will let go, and all my sisters.”

Kennedy himself survived a 1964 plane crash that killed an aide, suffering a broken back in the accident. But he recovered to lead the seemingly ill-starred clan through a series of other tragedies: Robert Kennedy’s son David died of a drug overdose in a Florida hotel in 1984; another of Robert’s sons, Michael, was killed in a skiing accident in Colorado in 1997; and John’s son John Jr., his wife Carolyn and sister-in-law Lauren Bessette died in a 1999 plane crash off Martha’s Vineyard.

In addition, his son Edward Jr. lost a leg to cancer in the 1970s, and daughter Kara survived a bout with the disease in the early 2000s.

Like brothers John and Robert, Edward Kennedy attended Harvard. He studied in the Netherlands before earning a law degree from the University of Virginia Law School, and worked in the district attorney’s office in Boston before entering politics.

Kennedy is survived by his second wife, Victoria Ann Reggie Kennedy, whom he married in 1992; his first wife, Joan Bennett; and five children-Patrick, Kara and Edward Jr. from his first marriage, and Curran and Caroline Raclin from his second. (ANI)

N. Korea can be made to give up its nuke weapons in half-a-day: Carter

New York, Jan.27 (ANI): Former US President Jimmy Carter has said that North Korea can be talked into surrendering its nukes in “half a day.”

Carter was quoted by Fox News as saying during an Associated Press interview on Monday that he believed North Korea would be willing to give up its nuclear weapons for U.S. diplomatic recognition, a peace deal with South Korea and America, and if it got new atomic power reactors and free fuel oil.

“It could be worked out, in my opinion, in half a day,” Carter said.

Last week, North Korea’s Foreign Ministry said it would give up its nuclear weapons only if Washington establishes diplomatic relations with the regime and the U.S. ceases to pose a nuclear threat to the North — an apparent reference to Pyongyang’s long-standing claim that American nuclear weapons are hidden in South Korea.

Both Seoul and Washington deny the accusation.

“I went over there in 1994 and I worked out a complete agreement with (former North Korean President) Kim Il Sung to eliminate all nuclear programs, and to let International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors come in without impediment,” Carter said.

“President Clinton adopted that and put it into effect,” in effect agreeing to give North Korea fuel oil and modernized, safe atomic reactors in exchange for dismantling its old reactors and allowing unfettered U.N. inspections, he added.

Carter’s and Clinton’s deals to dismantle the North Korean nuclear program — then consisting of reactors with only a theoretical weapons-building capacity — were shelved when President George W. Bush took office in 2001.

Anxious to dismantle the country’s atomic program, five regional powers hashed out a 2007 deal promising energy and other aid to Pyongyang in exchange for nuclear disarmament, but the agreement has been hindered by disputes between North Korea and the United States over how to verify what nuclear activities the country had undertaken in past decades.

Carter believes the deal could be accomplished almost instantly, with good will. (ANI)