No new recession, let tax cuts die: Geithner

(Reuters) – The economy is not likely to slip back into recession but letting tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans expire is necessary to show commitment to cutting budget deficits, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Sunday.

In appearances on several Sunday talk shows, Geithner said only 2 to 3 percent of Americans — those making $250,000 or more a year — will be affected when tax cuts enacted under former President George W. Bush end on schedule this year.

Republicans want to extend the tax cuts and Democrats are divided but Geithner said reductions for top earners should end.

“We think that’s the responsible thing to do because we need to make sure we can show the world that (we’re) willing as a country now to start to make some progress bringing down our long-term deficits,” he said on ABC’s “This Week” program.

Geithner played down fears that a slow-paced recovery might slide into a double-dip recession. He told NBC’s “Meet the Press” he did not expect that to happen, although recovery from the deep recession that followed the 2008-2009 financial crisis will be prolonged.

STRENGTHENING, BUT SLOWLY

“I think the most likely thing is you’ll see an economy that gradually strengthens over the next year or two, you’ll see job growth start to come back, investments expanding … but we’ve got a long way to go still,” Geithner said.

The Obama administration has said it wants to keep tax cuts in place for Americans earning less than $250,000 a year. Some Republicans say letting any of the tax cuts expire is effectively a tax hike that may hurt recovery.

Geithner disagreed, saying it was more important to aim tax cuts at lower-earning Americans and businesses.

“Just letting those tax cuts that only go to 2 percent to 3 percent of Americans, the highest-earning Americans in the country, expire I do not believe it will have a negative effect on growth,” he said on ABC.

Geithner said the Obama administration wants Congress to agree on measures to help small businesses, traditionally the main job-creating engine. He said there were signs “critical” private sector hiring was strengthening.

“We want to see it happen at a faster pace but I think most people understand that … this was a deep crisis,” he said. “It’s going to take time to repair that damage, take time to grow out of this.”

He said the overhaul of U.S. financial rules signed into law last week by President Barack Obama should bolster confidence in the economy by giving consumers new protections and the government more powers to restrain bank risk-taking.

Geithner said no reforms can ward off all future crises but can mitigate the harm. If the reforms that are now law, including powers to wind down troubled financial firms, had been in place before the crisis, the damage to jobs and fortunes would have been less, he said.

On NBC, Geithner said there is work ahead to repair the housing finance system that contributed to the crisis and led to putting mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into government conservatorship.

HOUSING REFORM STILL AN ISSUE

“We have to bring to Fannie and Freddie, to the GSEs (government-sponsored enterprises) and to the broader housing finance market a better set of policies to make sure we can deliver affordable financing … without leaving the economy vulnerable to this kind of crisis,” he said.

Geithner said some type of government guarantee to make sure people have the ability to borrow to finance a house even may be necessary but said Fannie and Freddie will not be preserved in their current forms.

“We’re going to have to bring fundamental change to that market but I think there’s going to be a good case for taking a look at preserving or putting in place a carefully designed guarantee so homeowners have the ability borrow … even in a very difficult recession,” he said.

Geithner said it was encouraging China recently ended a peg between its yuan currency and the dollar, which should help correct a trade relationship that enables China to rack up huge surpluses while the United States and others record soaring trade deficits.

“What matters to us and to all of China’s trading partners is that they let that currency appreciate,” he said. “What matters to us is how fast and how far they let it go.”

(Editing by John O’Callaghan)

UPDATE 2-Geithner: No new U.S. recession, let tax cuts die

WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) – The U.S. economy is not likely to slip back into recession but letting tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans expire is necessary to show commitment to cutting budget deficits, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Sunday.

In appearances on several Sunday talk shows, Geithner said only 2 to 3 percent of Americans — those making $250,000 or more a year — will be affected when tax cuts enacted under former President George W. Bush end on schedule this year.

Republicans want to extend the tax cuts and Democrats are divided but Geithner said reductions for top earners should end.

“We think that’s the responsible thing to do because we need to make sure we can show the world that (we’re) willing as a country now to start to make some progress bringing down our long-term deficits,” he said on ABC’s “This Week” program.

Geithner played down fears that a slow-paced recovery might slide into a double-dip recession. He told NBC’s “Meet the Press” he did not expect that to happen, although recovery from the deep recession that followed the 2008-2009 financial crisis will be prolonged.

STRENGTHENING, BUT SLOWLY

“I think the most likely thing is you’ll see an economy that gradually strengthens over the next year or two, you’ll see job growth start to come back, investments expanding … but we’ve got a long way to go still,” Geithner said.

The Obama administration has said it wants to keep tax cuts in place for Americans earning less than $250,000 a year. Some Republicans say letting any of the tax cuts expire is effectively a tax hike that may hurt recovery.

Geithner disagreed, saying it was more important to aim tax cuts at lower-earning Americans and businesses.

“Just letting those tax cuts that only go to 2 percent to 3 percent of Americans, the highest-earning Americans in the country, expire I do not believe it will have a negative effect on growth,” he said on ABC.

Geithner said the Obama administration wants Congress to agree on measures to help small businesses, traditionally the main job-creating engine. He said there were signs “critical” private sector hiring was strengthening.

“We want to see it happen at a faster pace but I think most people understand that … this was a deep crisis,” he said. “It’s going to take time to repair that damage, take time to grow out of this.”

He said the overhaul of U.S. financial rules signed into law last week by President Barack Obama should bolster confidence in the economy by giving consumers new protections and the government more powers to restrain bank risk-taking.

Geithner said no reforms can ward off all future crises but can mitigate the harm. If the reforms that are now law, including powers to wind down troubled financial firms, had been in place before the crisis, the damage to jobs and fortunes would have been less, he said.

On NBC, Geithner said there is work ahead to repair the housing finance system that contributed to the crisis and led to putting mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into government conservatorship.

HOUSING REFORM STILL AN ISSUE

“We have to bring to Fannie and Freddie, to the GSEs (government-sponsored enterprises) and to the broader housing finance market a better set of policies to make sure we can deliver affordable financing … without leaving the economy vulnerable to this kind of crisis,” he said.

Geithner said some type of government guarantee to make sure people have the ability to borrow to finance a house even may be necessary but said Fannie and Freddie will not be preserved in their current forms.

“We’re going to have to bring fundamental change to that market but I think there’s going to be a good case for taking a look at preserving or putting in place a carefully designed guarantee so homeowners have the ability borrow … even in a very difficult recession,” he said.

Geithner said it was encouraging China recently ended a peg between its yuan currency and the dollar, which should help correct a trade relationship that enables China to rack up huge surpluses while the United States and others record soaring trade deficits.

“What matters to us and to all of China’s trading partners is that they let that currency appreciate,” he said. “What matters to us is how fast and how far they let it go.” (Editing by John O’Callaghan)

Most at Guantanamo are low-level fighters – report

Most of the 240 detainees at the Guantanamo Bay prison when President Barack Obama took office were low-level fighters, with only 24 considered to be involved in plots against the United States, The Washington Post reported on Friday.

The newspaper said the report from the Guantanamo Review Task Force recommended 126 of the detainees be transferred either to their homes or a third country; 36 be prosecuted in federal court or by a military commission; and 48 be held indefinitely under the laws of war.

In addition to the 10 percent the report said were involved in plots against the United States, about 20 percent had significant roles with al Qaeda or similar groups.

The Post said the report was finished in January and sent to lawmakers earlier this week.

The Obama administration held on to the report following the attempted bombing of an airplane on Christmas Day because there was little public or congressional interest in its plan to close the facility, the paper said.

Obama ordered the widely maligned detention camp at the U.S. naval base in Cuba shut down shortly after taking office in January 2009. But his plans have been stymied by Congress, including some members of his own Democratic Party.

Former President George W. Bush’s administration opened the prison in January 2002 to hold and interrogate foreign captives suspected of links to terrorism.

There are now about 180 detainees. At its peak, the camp held about 780 detainees.

(Writing by Christopher Doering; Editing by Peter Cooney)

Iraq war badly planned, poorly resourced – Bremer

Planning for the 2003 invasion of Iraq was inadequate and not enough troops were sent to ensure post-conflict security, the former U.S. diplomat who led the civilian occupation authority after the war has told a British inquiry.

Paul Bremer, who governed Iraq’s Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) for 13 months after President Saddam Hussein was toppled, said there had been a serious miscalculation by those responsible for planning the invasion.

“It is impossible to exaggerate the difficulties created by the chronic under-resourcing of the CPA’s efforts,” Bremer said in a statement, made public on Friday, to an inquiry examining Britain’s role in the war.

“This problem, and the fact that the coalition was unable to provide adequate security for Iraqi citizens, pervaded virtually everything we did, or tried to do, throughout the 14 months of the CPA’s existence.”

As head of the CPA, Bremer was then-President George W. Bush’s top official in Iraq from May 2003 until June 2004 when the United States returned sovereignty to Iraqi authorities.

The Pentagon has previously acknowledged that Bremer’s request in 2004 for about 500,000 extra troops was turned down by then-Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Critics say the Pentagon deployed too few U.S. soldiers to maintain order, restore essential services such as power and water and combat an escalating insurgency.

“It was evident to me from the start that the pre-war planning had been inadequate, largely because it was based on incorrect assumptions about the nature of the post-war situation on the ground in Iraq,” Bremer’s statement said.

“Even before I left for Baghdad, I was concerned that the coalition had insufficient troops to carry out its primary duty of providing security for the Iraqi people.”

LOOTING COST $12 BILLION

Bremer said the failure to check the violence and looting after Saddam was ousted cost Iraq’s economy some $12 billion. But he said of greater damage was the message it gave Iraqis that the coalition could not provide basic security.

He again defended his decision to disband the Iraqi army after the war, which many experts consider was a mistake causing many ex-soldiers to join the insurgency, and to ban members of Saddam’s Baath Party from government posts.

“The myth that de-Baathification collapsed the Iraqi government is simply unsupported by the facts,” he said.

“No doubt some members of the former army may have subsequently joined the insurgency. But if they did so, for most of them it was not because they had been denied an opportunity to serve their country again. It was because they wanted to install a Baathist dictatorship.”

The British public inquiry, headed by former civil servant John Chilcot, said it had questioned a number of U.S. officials this month including Bremer, but only provided details of those who had agreed to have their names released publicly.

The five-person panel began its work last year and has already quizzed former prime ministers Gordon Brown and Tony Blair, who was Bush’s strongest ally in the war.

Its hearings, which ceased during the recent British election, are due to resume in London in the summer.

(Editing by Mark Heinrich)

Bush was told by wife to choose between fatherhood and booze

London, May 26 (ANI): Former American President George W Bush’s new book ‘Decision Points’ starts with an anecdote about his wife trying to convince him to quit drinking and choose fatherhood over alcohol.

The former leader admitted it was the crucial moment that triggered his journey to presidency.

He confessed that he asked himself whether he loved booze more than his wife, Laura.

Speaking at the American Wind Energy Association conference in Dallas, he said that the book focuses on some of the most important decisions he has made in his life.

“The sad thing is you don”t get do-overs. You”ve got to make the calls. I got some right. I got some wrong,” the Telegraph quoted him, as saying.

Bush hopes to place readers in his shoes by sharing his experience as the President.

He added: “I don”t think you can come to a definitive conclusion about a presidency until the passage of time. I want to put you in my position.”

He admitted that life had changed after his exit from the White House.

Recollecting a moment when he was walking his dog Barney through his new neighbourhood in Dallas, he said: “There I was. Former president of the United States, with a plastic bag in my hand, picking up what I had been dodging for eight solid years.”

The book is set due to be out in November. (ANI)

Somalia-based American jihadist using Rap music to attract Western recruits

New York, May 20 (ANI): Abu Mansoor al-Amriki, the American jihadist based in Somalia, has reportedly developed a new and unusual approach to attract Western Muslim recruits — Hip-Hop.

Over the past year Amriki, whose real name is Omar Hammami, and who was born to a Syrian father and Southern Baptist mother in Alabama 26 years ago, has released a series of five rap songs over the Internet extolling the virtues of jihad and condemning America”s presence in Muslim countries, reports ABC News.

Hammami has emerged as the star of jihadi videos, praising Islamic militancy in Somalia and is believed to be a member of al Shahab, a Somali Islamic militant group aligned with Osama bin Laden”s al Qaeda that is currently fighting the fragile civilian government of Somalia.

While snippets of the five songs appeared in the background of a video released last year, the songs are now all available in their entirety on the Internet.

They represent a crude attempt to reach young, Western Muslims who may prefer to listen to music rather than a religious preacher.

His most recent release, “First Stop Addis,” however, named after the Ethiopian capital of Addis Ababa, appears to be a few years old. The song, which emerged earlier this month and speaks of a love for “slaughter[ing] Crusaders,” references ex-president George W. Bush and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

In a better known title that emerged last year, “Blow by Blow,” Hammami softly invites American military strikes in Afghanistan and Somalia, “Bomb by bomb/Blast by blast/Only going to bring back the glorious past.” The song lasts about two minutes and 30 seconds.

The track is aimed at an English-speaking audience with a history lesson for those sympathetic to Islamic holy warriors.

According to the strict interpretation of Islam current in al Qaeda and other terrorist groups, music is forbidden. (ANI)

Americans optimistic about economy, pessimistic about jobs

Washington, May 14 (ANI): A majority of American voters believe the nation””s economy is improving, but an equal number believe the job situation is getting worse, according to the latest Fox News poll.

Many more voters continue to say former President George W. Bush is responsible for the federal deficit.

The new poll finds 49 percent of voters think the economy is getting better, while 37 percent say it is getting worse and 11 percent say “staying the same.”

The number saying things are getting better is up 9 percentage points from 40 percent who thought so a year ago (June 2009).

But when it comes to jobs, it””s the reverse: 36 percent say it””s getting better and 48 percent getting worse.

On a personal level, 36 percent say it feels like things are getting better for their family, while about the same number — 38 percent — says it feels like things are getting worse. Another 24 percent say it feels like things are staying the same.

Opinion Dynamics Corp. conducted the national telephone poll for Fox News among 900 registered voters from May 4 to May 5. For the total sample, the poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points. (ANI)

A trip to Shanghai Expo

It is a small but odd world at Shanghai’s World Expo, where nuclear problem states North Korea and Iran are next-door neighbors, and visitors can check out such novelties as translucent concrete and a curtain made of solar-cell soybean fiber.

The Expo has been drawing hundreds of thousands of visitors since its May 1 opening, and hours-long lines jam around the most popular pavilions, especially the Japanese, Italian, French and Australian exhibits.

While the majestic red China pavilion can been seen only with a “fast pass” reservation system that sells out after just minutes each day, visitors can just waltz right into the nearly deserted North Korean pavilion, which is tucked behind Iran’s in the northeast corner of the 5.28 square kilometer (2 square mile) Expo grounds.

The Expo’s theme of “Better City, Better Life” allows for a vast range of interpretations by the 189 countries and 57 international organizations participating.

South Korea’s pavilion is shaped in characters from its “hangul” alphabet, with some walls covered with colorful tiles embossed with smaller characters. It features the country’s most advanced technology and traditional culture.

North Korea, participating in a world’s fair for the first time ever, has a much more spartan exhibit, like the impoverished country itself.

Its pavilion features film clips of life under its “Dear Leader,” Kim Jong Il – shots of families bowling and visiting parks – and models of the capital Pyongyang’s “Juche Tower” and the Taedong River, a winding stream of shiny clear plastic over wrinkled blue sheeting.

A fountain, a few video screens and a counter selling books and other North Korean paraphernalia sum up the rest.

Though both North Korea and Iran remain nuclear trouble spots, they no longer are deemed part of the “axis of evil,” as then-President George W. Bush dubbed those two countries and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq in 2002.

With so many cultures gathered in one area, surprises are inevitable.

One recent day, the music blaring from the Qatar pavilion – which is clustered with other Muslim countries Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates and Oman around the Israeli exhibit – was an instrumental version of “Sunrise, Sunset,” a song sung at a Jewish wedding in the film “Fiddler on the Roof.”

In a joint pavilion nearby that also houses exhibits from Afghanistan and Brunei, Palestine is displaying an abundance of creches, handcarved crucifixes and other handicrafts for sale.

The locations of the largest pavilions seem strategically thought out in some cases and puzzling in others. The eagle-shaped USA Pavilion and Russia’s sun-shaped structure anchor one end of the sprawling Expo grounds, Japan’s lavender silkworm dome the other. Of course, China, the erstwhile Middle Kingdom, stands at the center.

India’s pavilion sits beside Nepal’s but well away from Pakistan’s. Argentina’s is adjacent to others from the Americas, but its closest neighbors are Slovenia, South Africa and Tunisia.

One joint pavilion, provided by host China to other developing countries, groups such odd bedfellows as Mongolia, the Maldives, Tajikistan and East Timor, all in Asia but otherwise about as unalike as countries could be.

Given the Expo’s theme of sustainability, many pavilions use recyclable and ultrahigh tech materials, like the solar cell soybean fiber netting around the Swiss pavilion, which is said to be biodegradable.

Italy’s pavilion uses a type of translucent cement that by allowing light to shine through walls can help save on energy, while Britain’s has a six-story “Seed Cathedral” formed by 60,000 see-through fiber optic rods.

Across the river are corporate pavilions sponsored by big companies like Coca-Cola, Cisco Systems Inc. and General Motors Co. In keeping with the Japanese philosophy that “customer is king,” the joint Japan Industry pavilion is drawing attention with its “throne room,” said to be the best toilet at the Expo.

But only a few lucky visitors will win the lottery that gives them a chance to experience in that deluxe “comfort zone.”

Reservations are already full, meanwhile, for the next two months for the pavilion’s special “kaiseki” restaurant, where meals cost a mean 3,000 yuan ($440) – or about what it costs to fly to Japan.

Hillary’s statement on bin Laden an insult to Pak: JeI chief

Lahore, May 12 (ANI): Jamaat-e-Islami chief Syed Munawar Hasan has said that the allegations made by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton against Pakistan regarding Osama bin Laden and Taliban supremo Mullah Umar amount to a blatant insult to the government, people and the armed forces.

Clinton had accused that there were people in the Pakistani Government who knew the whereabouts of bin Laden and Mullah Omar, and asked Islamabad to increase cooperation to capture or kill all the attackers of 9/11.

In a statement on Tuesday, the JI chief stressed upon Islamabad to protest against Hilary’s statements and also announce pulling out of this “crusade” against al-Qaeda and the Taliban, telling Washington that “enough is enough.”

Syed Munawar Hasan said former US President George W Bush had blamed bin Laden for the 9/11 tragedy without any investigation and had announced that Osama would be captured soon, dead or alive.

He said the US, despite its latest technology and resources, had failed to get hold of bin Laden during the last nine years and was now putting the blame on Pakistan only to hide its embarrassment, The News reports.

He also said that Faisal Shahzad’s drama was also staged to intensify pressure on Islamabad.

He said even if Faisal Shahzad was involved in the Time Square plot, there was no reason to blame Pakistan for an individual’s act and issue threats on this count. (ANI)

UK’s ”special relationship” with US will remain, but next PM won”t cozy up to Obama

Washington, May 7 (ANI): US President Barack Obama will have to accept that while his country’s relationship with Britain will remain special, the next Prime Minister of that country will not be subservient to Washington, as has been the case with Gordon Brown and Tony Blair.

According to the New York Daily News, Britain’s New Labor Party has never recovered from the perception that Blair was so tight with Washington that he was ridiculed as President George W. Bush”s “poodle.”

“The longstanding U.S. assumption of automatic British support for its policies is now in question,” predicted Martin Walker, a former Washington correspondent for The Guardian.

“The Lone Ranger can no longer count on Tonto,” Walker added last week.

Officially, both governments express their undying affection and say common interests – Afghanistan, global trade, financial reform and Iranian nukes – ensure the relationship will stay strong.

“There may be some tonal shifts, but not a lot,” an Anglo-American specialist said, “and no real policy shifts.” (ANI)

Bush to admit to ”flaws and mistakes” in his memoir

Washington, Apr.27 (ANI): Former US President George W Bush will admit to his “flaws and mistakes” in a forthcoming memoir.

According to The Telegraph, the memoir will focus on 14 key decisions made during his eight years in office (2001-2009).

According to Crown Publishing, Decision Points, will offer “gripping, never-before-heard detail” about key events such as the disputed 2000 election, the September 11 attacks and the launch of the war on Iraq.

Aided by a former White House speech-writer Chris Michel, Bush will also reveal his decisions on the financial crisis, Hurricane Katrina, Afghanistan and Iran, as well as discussing his battle with alcohol, his discovery of faith and family relationships.

Since leaving the White House in January 2009, Bush has dedicated most of his time to the book, which will be released this autumn.

The cover features a photo of then-President Bush alone with his thoughts, standing in the Rose Garden colonnade of the White House, wearing a dark suit and holding a briefing book.

During his presidency, Bush was known for his unapologetic approach, especially regarding the Iraq War, and for taking pride in his decisiveness. He left office amid a collapsing economy and the lowest approval ratings any president has ever received since polling began. (ANI)

Faster weapons may replace nukes in US

In coming years, US President Barack Obama will decide whether to deploy a new class of weapons capable of reaching any corner of the earth from the United States in under an hour and with such accuracy and force that they would greatly diminish America’s reliance on its nuclear arsenal.

Called Prompt Global Strike, the new weapon is designed to carry out tasks like picking off Osama bin Laden in a cave, if the right one could be found; taking out a North Korean missile while it is being rolled to the launch pad; or destroying an Iranian nuclear site – all without crossing the nuclear threshold.

In theory, the weapon will hurl a conventional warhead of enormous weight at high speed and with pinpoint accuracy, generating the localised destructive power of a nuclear warhead.

The idea is not new: Former US President George W Bush and his staff promoted the technology, imagining that this new generation of conventional weapons would replace nuclear warheads on submarines.

Russian leaders complained that the technology could increase the risk of a nuclear war, because Russia would not know if the missiles carried nuclear warheads or conventional ones.

The idea “really hadn’t gone anywhere in the Bush administration”, Defence Secretary Robert M Gates said on ABC’s This Week.

Obama himself alluded to the concept in a recent interview with The New York Times, saying it was part of an effort “to move towards less emphasis on nuclear weapons” while insuring “that our conventional weapons capability is an effective deterrent in all but the most extreme circumstances”.

The Prompt Global Strike would be mounted on a long-range missile to start its journey toward a target. It would travel through the atmosphere at several times the speed of sound, generating so much heat that it would have to be shielded with special material to avoid melting. Its designers note that it could fly straight up the Persian Gulf before making a sharp turn toward a target. The Pentagon hopes to deploy an early version of the system by 2014 or 2015.

Venezuela oil min says U.S. war with Iraq was for oil

Venezuela’s oil minister on Friday criticized the United States for promoting secure global energy supplies and at the same destabilizing oil producing countries like Iraq.

Venezuela’s Rafael Ramirez argued the United States’ war with Iraq “was an aggression for oil” and said that contradicted Washington’s call for the world’s energy supplies to be secure.

“How can big and industrialized consuming countries pretend to (want) stability in supply, if they are provoking destabilization in producing nations,” Ramirez told reporters on the sidelines of an energy and climate change conference in Washington.

Speaking on oil market issues, Ramirez said that OPEC should set production levels that keep crude costs in a price band of between $80 and $100 a barrel.

“We need to build a band between $80 and $100 a barrel. That should be the band,” he said.

Ramirez said OPEC ministers are discussing how to maintain stable oil prices, even though the price band he suggested would be much higher than the $85 price that oil has traded around in recent weeks.

Both Venezuela and Iraq are members of OPEC.

Ramirez is making his first visit to Washington in six years after relations between Venezuela and the United States soured during the administration of former President George W. Bush.

Ramirez said he wanted to restart communications on energy issues that have been cut off between the two countries. However, he seemed to backpedal from some of his comments made on Thursday when he said U.S. companies should invest in developing Venezuela’s vast oil reserves.

“We did not come here to look for investors. We came here to talk to governments,” he said.

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu met with Ramirez after the conference ended. The two countries agreed to restart in the coming months dialogue on technical energy issues.

“While the U.S. and Venezuela certainly don’t agree on all issues, Secretary Chu and the administration believe that dialogue on energy and climate issues is important for our two countries,” the Energy Department said in a statement describing the meeting.

Chu and Ramirez were to focus on energy issues, but the meeting was seen by some as an important step in improving relations between the two countries.

That may have been true based on the other senior U.S. government officials who attended the meeting, including Richard Duddy, U.S. Ambassador to Venezuela, and Cheryl Mills, Chief of Staff to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

It is rare that talks between a U.S. energy secretary and his visiting counterpart have included such U.S. diplomats.

“This is a step forward,” Chu told reporters before the meeting. “I think we’re going to be making good progress.”

(Reporting by Tom Doggett; Editing by Marguerita Choy and David Gregorio)

SPECIAL REPORT – U.S. shifts gears to tackle homespun terrorism

At a recent congressional hearing on homespun terrorism, Indiana Representative Mark Souder tore into a little-known Los Angeles County sheriff named Lee Baca.

Souder, a Republican member of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing and Terrorism Risk Assessment, pointedly asked why Baca had attended several fund-raisers for an American Muslim group that some describe as a front for Hamas, which is designated by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization.

“The question is, at what point do you start giving legitimacy to groups who fund Hamas?” Souder said. He was referring to Baca’s association with the Council On American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, which says it does not support terrorism.

Raising his voice and pointing his finger at the congressman, Baca exploded: “For you to associate me (with terrorism) somehow through some circuitous attack on CAIR is not only inappropriate, it is un-American.”

In an interview with Reuters afterward, Baca said the congressman was playing politics. “Souder doesn’t have a solution for dealing with extremism in the United States,” he said. “I have a solution. I have a vision. I have relationships with the Muslim community and am working to make that vision a reality.”

The public altercation on March 17 between Souder, whose office did not return calls seeking comment, and Baca took place amid a significant shift in how the U.S. intends to deal with an alarming, relatively new threat: the recruitment of American Muslims, especially the young, by Islamist militants.

But the heated exchange also underlines the treacherous politics involved in adopting a new strategy that depends less on surveillance (though that won’t go away) and more on dialogue with the U.S. communities in danger of losing their most impressionable cohort to violent jihad.

DEALING WITH EXTREMISM

The administration of President George W. Bush prided itself on taking a hard line on terrorism. Part of its rationale for fighting a war on two fronts was, as Bush said in June 2005 speech, “taking the fight to the terrorists abroad, so we don’t have to face them here at home.”

But a recent spate of security incidents involving the American Muslims is considered by many as evidence that terrorists are already in the house.

“While our European counterparts have been dealing with the threat of radical extremism for some time now, I think we can all agree that the problem is now in the United States,” said Michael McCaul, the ranking Republican member of the subcommittee Souder serves on, at the March 17 hearing.

Teenagers are a top target for recruiters. “A lot of Muslim kids doubt that they belong here because they are made to feel like they are different and inferior, that somehow they are not American,” said Abed Hammoud, a political activist and prosecutor in the Detroit area. “That makes it potentially easier to recruit them.”

A growing school of thought among counterterrorism specialists, and within the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama, argues that law enforcement should engage more deeply with the Muslim community. Their case has been bolstered by encouraging examples of outreach programs in the Netherlands, Britain and, closer to home, Los Angeles.

“There is no guarantee that we can stop every attack,” said Mike Rolince, a counterterrorism specialist who spent 31 years at the Federal Bureau of Investigation and now works for consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton and provides technological and strategic consulting services to the U.S. intelligence community. “But the best chance we have lies in sustained engagement with the Muslim community.”

As part of the shift, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, on Feb. 3, asked the department’s Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC) — which consists of state and local government officials, first responders, plus academics and private sector representatives — to come up with recommendations on how to overhaul its operations with an eye toward community-based law enforcement.

An official said that review would also focus on how to make the DHS less centralized and more of a resource centre for local law enforcement, plus how to fund, train and support those on the ground who are best placed to tackle homegrown terrorism.

“We are at a watershed moment where we are asking, what is the role of the Department of Homeland Security? What is the best way to use our resources?” said an official at the DHS, who was not allowed to talk on the record. “This problem is not going to be solved by someone from Washington.”

HSAC’s preliminary recommendations are due in May.

U.S. officials and members of America’s Muslim community say two recent incidents show that both sides want to engage each other. There was Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, charged with trying to detonate explosives in his underwear on a Northwest Airlines flight to Detroit on Dec. 25. His father had tried to alert U.S. authorities to his son’s growing radicalism in Nigeria last November, although his warning was not heeded.

That same month, a group of young Pakistani Americans known as the “Northern Virginia Five” were arrested in Pakistan, where they had gone to try to join the Taliban, after their parents were put in touch with the FBI by CAIR.

“This is a case study of cooperation and partnership,” said Nihad Awad, executive director of CAIR. “We should not waste this opportunity.”

POLITICS OF SECURITY

But outreach has the potential to turn political, with Democrats anxious not to appear soft on terrorism before the November elections and Republicans smelling opportunity. Opponents on the right are fiercely critical of this shift in counterterrorism strategy.

“Outreach is a joke,” said conservative commentator Debbie Schlussel, who advocates being tough on mosques and immigration. “Muslims don’t respect people who kowtow to them. I think they respect those whom they fear.”

Obama and Napolitano came under fire for their handling of the failed Dec. 25 bomb attempt, which fuelled Republican criticism that the president is weak on national security.

The expected reaction from the right, some say, has made the Obama administration nervous.

“The DHS is very, very skittish about outreach,” said a former government counterterrorism official who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They are being overly tentative because there are plenty of people on the right who want to portray the Obama administration as soft on terror.”

But outreach advocates say growing support for a policy shift in the intelligence community means while opposition will be stiff, it is not insurmountable.

“There has been a perceptible shift,” said Keith Ellison, who was elected America’s first Muslim congressman in 2006. “More and more Americans understand we need to reach out and stop demonizing an entire community. This (opposition to outreach) is still a powerful lobby, but I think in six months to a year their inflammatory voices will begin to be ignored.”

“A VERY TOUGH TIME FOR EVERYONE”

All told, Muslim community leaders say the eight plus years that have elapsed since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, have seen a massive and worrying breakdown in trust between Muslim Americans and U.S. authorities.

“Before 9/11, parents told kids that if they saw anything bad or suspicious they should find a police officer because the police were there to help,” said Ned Fawaz, a businessman in the Detroit area. “Today they tell kids to stay away from the police no matter what. That breakdown in trust is terribly sad.”

When 19 attackers hijacked four planes on Sept. 11, 2001, crashing two of them into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York and one into the Pentagon, Sam Abed had just finished law school. He passed the bar exam that October and started looking for a job.

A year later, he had sent out more than 1,000 resumes and had not had a single interview while classmates who graduated lower than him in his class all found work.

Frustrated and demoralized, Abed asked one of his law professors at the University of Richmond in Virginia for advice. The professor changed one word on his resume. He crossed out Abed’s real first name, Osama, and wrote ‘Sam.’

Abed sent out 12 resumes the next week and was offered three interviews. “I thought people wouldn’t judge me based on my name alone, but it apparently had an impact,” said Abed, who now works at the Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice. “It was a very tough time for me.”

“But it was a very tough time for everyone,” he added, philosophically. “I am not saying that the racism and discrimination that we saw after 9/11 was right, but it was understandable given the fear and anger that everyone felt.”

Estimates vary as to how many Muslims there are in America. No one knows for sure, in part because the U.S. Census Bureau does not ask people to list their religion.

According to a May 2007 study by the Pew Research Center, there were some 2.35 million Muslims in America. But the Association of Religion Data Archives put the number at almost 4.8 million in 2005. The majority of Americans, around 75 percent according to Pew, are Christians of various denominations.

One of the biggest complaints from American Muslims is that they say they are aggressively profiled by the government based on their religion, especially at airports — a charge that the U.S. Transportation Security Administration disputes. The TSA says its security measures are “based on threat, not ethnic or religious background.”

Many American Muslims say they have experienced greater harassment since the Dec. 25 “Underwear Bomber” incident. This has caused frustration because that incident is widely seen as a failure of the U.S. security system.

“Muslims have had to pay the price for the government’s mistakes,” said Imam Hassan Qazwini, a prominent moderate cleric at the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, the country’s largest mosque.

TARGETING THE ALIENATED

Clark Ervin, director of the homeland security program at the Aspen Institute, was the DHS’s first inspector general and is a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council charged with looking at how to retool the department’s approach to law enforcement.

He said that common factors that contribute to leading impressionable minds down the path to violence are: a lack of economic opportunity; a limited education; strained family ties; a sense of impotence; alienation and grievance, plus a desire to be a part of something big and noble.

“We need to get ahead of that production curve and find out what causes the problem,” he said.

Imam Husham Al-Husainy, director of the Karbalaa Islamic Education Center in Dearborn, which is home to America’s largest Muslim community, says that every time he drives into Canada, he is held up at the border for hours at a time when he returns to the United States.

Al-Husainy said this treatment makes him worried for his 16-year-old son. “I am a grownup so I can understand what is happening. But I’m worried because what would happen if he started carrying hate in his heart because he’s treated differently than other Americans?”

Eboo Patel, executive director of the Chicago-based Interfaith Youth Core, said that there is a “pretty clear process that works like gang recruitment in inner city neighbourhoods.”

“The extremists have created a strong network of recruiters,” he said. “And they use a three-part story on recruits.”

“The narrative goes that we were meant to be and were once a magnificent people,” Patel added. “The trouble is, now we are the victims of oppression. You can help return us to glory. What you have to do is overthrow the oppressors.”

Radicalization is not, however, restricted to the young. Major Nidal Malik Hasan, 39, charged with 13 counts of murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder following a rampage at Fort Hood Army base last Nov. 5, reportedly visited extremist websites and exchanged e-mails with radical Yemeni cleric Anwar al-Awlaki.

Zudhi Jasser, president of Phoenix-based American Islamic Forum for Democracy, a moderate group that advocates the separation of mosque and state, said Hasan’s biography was “freakishly similar to my own.” Both attended medical school and served in the U.S. armed forces. Hasan’s parents were Palestinian, Jasser’s came from Syria.

“I was raised by my parents to believe that we could be more Muslim here in America than anywhere else,” Jasser said. “Somewhere along the way, Hasan’s narrative obviously differed greatly from mine.”

In a report released last month, the Center for Strategic and International Studies noted that the Internet’s “limitless scope allows for the relatively unchecked proliferation of radical material.”

“These communications (between recruiters and recruits) often occurred online, whether via e-mail, Facebook, YouTube, or one of thousands of extremist chat rooms,” the report said.

Rolince of Booz Allen Hamilton, the consulting firm, echoed that view: “Now it’s harder to find recruiters because it’s easier to hide messages and to hide intent, and people can look at that content online in their basement, in libraries and coffee shops.”

Congressman Ellison, whose district in Minnesota includes a Somali community from which some two dozen young men were recruited to fight for an insurgent group in Somalia, said low-income teenagers with no prospects are easy targets.

“The sales pitch is ‘Come home to your country and rid it of foreign invaders,’” he said. “Kids coming from fractured families and low-income backgrounds find a way to get into trouble if given no opportunity. So we need to give them those opportunities.”

LOOKING TO EUROPE

U.S. counterterrorism specialists have looked to recent European experiences.

“Given the nature of its society, America has handled the integration piece well, so that Muslims feel like they are part of the culture,” said Stephen Grand, director of U.S. relations with the Islamic world at the Brookings Institution. “But the Europeans have handled the outreach piece better.”

A March 2009 bipartisan study compiled by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy titled “Rewriting the Narrative: An Integrated Strategy for Counterradicalization” looked at how the Dutch and British have tried to engage with their Muslim communities. The study praised the Netherlands for a “particularly innovative approach to countering radicalization at the local level.”

The Dutch approach employs an “information house” using networks of local Muslims to whom people can refer concerns about specific individuals. The aim is for the local community to handle situations itself without referring to local law enforcement unless there is imminent danger.

The British outreach project, called Prevent, was also held up as a good example. But that program has experienced its own difficulties, as the British government has found that intertwining outreach activities and law enforcement has fuelled suspicion among Muslim communities that the program has been used to spy on them.

In a U.S. case that could undermine efforts to encourage cooperation, an imam who previously had been helpful to law enforcement in New York is being deported after he pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI as they investigated a plot to attack the New York subway system.

The Aspen Institute’s Ervin said the shift in government thinking on outreach has also been greatly influenced by what the U.S. military “famously and disastrously” learned from direct experience as the 2003 invasion of Iraq turned into a long occupation.

“The military discovered in Iraq that reaching out to a community and involving local leaders brought much better results than working without them,” he said.

L.A. CONFIDENTIAL

As part of its policy review, the DHS’s Homeland Security Advisory Council is looking at the experience of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department under Lee Baca, who is on the council. His outreach program, as well as a Muslim Contact Unit, is staffed by Muslim officers. Los Angeles County is America’s most populous county with nearly 10 million residents and Baca heads the world’s largest sheriff’s department with more than 13,000 employees.

“We cannot afford to alienate the great portion of society that is Muslim by virtue of our ignorance,” Baca said of his outreach program. “I’m very well received in the Muslim community now, not because I’m special but because I know how to listen.”

Sergeant Mike Abdeen, who heads the unit, said that when he started in 2007 the reception from local Muslims was frosty at best.

“After what they went through post-9/11 with the FBI using informants and infiltrating the mosques, the Muslims thought we were here to gather intelligence on them,” Abdeen said. “It took a lot of daily contact and working with the community to prove that we are here to serve them too.”

“Now, if there is a problem people in the community will pick up the phone and talk to me,” he added. “They know me and they trust me.”

Chief Mike Grossman, who heads the department’s Homeland Security Division, said daily contact with the Muslim community had paid dividends. He said an American Muslim parent had approached him recently seeking advice about a son whose demeanor, dress and attitude had changed and he was now clearly becoming a devout Muslim.

“What this parent wanted to know was whether the signs they were seeing indicated their son was just being more devout or becoming radicalized,” Grossman said. “We were able to talk calmly about what signs to look for and how to tackle the issue.”

“This program is priceless,” he said. “Without personal daily contact and personal relationships, we would not have a clue what’s going on.”

(Additional reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky, Rebecca Cook, Tim Gaynor, William Maclean and Steve Holland; editing by Jim Impoco and Claudia Parsons)

Obama’s healthcare win could boost foreign policy

President Barack Obama’s domestic success on healthcare reform may pay dividends abroad as the strengthened U.S. leader taps his momentum to take on international issues with allies and adversaries.

More than a dozen foreign leaders have congratulated Obama on the new healthcare law in letters and phone calls, a sign of how much attention the fight for his top domestic policy priority received in capitals around the world.

Analysts and administration officials were cautious about the bump Obama could get from such a win: Iran is not going to rethink its nuclear program and North Korea is not going to return to the negotiating table simply because more Americans will get health insurance in the coming years, they said.

But the perception of increased clout, after a rocky first year that produced few major domestic or foreign policy victories, could generate momentum for Obama’s agenda at home and in his talks on a host of issues abroad.

“It helps him domestically and I also think it helps him internationally that he was able to win and get through a major piece of legislation,” said Stephen Hadley, former national security adviser to Republican President George W. Bush.

“It shows political strength, and that counts when dealing with foreign leaders.”

Obama’s deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said the Democratic president’s persistence in the long healthcare battle added credibility to his rhetoric on climate change, nuclear nonproliferation and other foreign policy goals.

“It sends a very important message about President Obama as a leader,” Rhodes told Reuters during an interview in his West Wing office.

“The criticism has been: (He) sets big goals but doesn’t close the deal. So, there’s no more affirmative answer to that criticism than closing the biggest deal you have going.”

Foreign policy dividends have been minimal in the short amount of time since he signed the healthcare bill into law on Tuesday.

Exhibit A: a one-on-one meeting this week between Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, a country that closely tracks U.S. domestic policy, yielded little sign of a breakthrough in a dispute over Jewish housing construction on occupied land in Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem.

A FOREIGN POLICY SUCCESS, TOO

Still, some specific foreign policy successes are looming.

U.S. and Russian officials say Washington and Moscow are close to announcing an agreement on a nuclear arms reduction treaty, which would require a two-thirds majority in the U.S. Senate for ratification.

Some analysts said Russia was watching Obama’s domestic successes and failures throughout the process.

“I think there were some in the Kremlin saying, ‘how strong is he? If he can’t get some of these things through, does that give us more leverage to push him on arms control?’” said Steven Pifer, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine and now a senior fellow at the Washington-based Brookings Institution.

Administration officials played down a connection between healthcare and talks with Russia on the START nuclear arms treaty, though Rhodes said the processes that led to success on both issues were similar.

“Like healthcare, the START treaty has been a negotiation where at times we seemed very close to getting a deal done and then there were huge roadblocks,” Rhodes said, crediting Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for sticking it out.

“So, it was a similar narrative of persistence, of refusing to throw in the towel at times when he could have.”

Foreign leaders have noted the persistence.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown were among the leaders who congratulated Obama, and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak said the healthcare win would have a positive impact abroad, according to White House spokesman Robert Gibbs.

Analysts said the bill’s passage showed Obama could deliver votes for domestic legislation with foreign policy components, such as rules to fight climate change, currently stalled in the Senate, which European leaders are eager to see advance.

James Lindsay, senior vice president at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, who was sceptical that Obama’s healthcare win would have a huge foreign policy benefit, said the law did free up the president to focus less on purely domestic issues.

“If the president had lost on healthcare, it would have further sapped his popularity as president, requiring him to spend even more time on domestic affairs and left him with less time to devote to foreign policy,” he said.

“That’s not the same as saying that because the healthcare bill has passed that the Iranians are going to be more pliable in their nuclear program, that the Israelis are going to rethink their settlement policy or the Chinese are going to become more agreeable on currency issues.”

(Editing by Xavier Briand)

Obama’s Moon plans ‘catastrophic’, say former NASA astronauts

London, March 13 (ANI): A BBC report has voiced the displeasure that former NASA astronauts have over US President Barack Obama’s decision to push Moon missions further back, with one astronaut even saying that it would be catastrophic for US space exploration.

The astronauts spoke to the BBC at a private event at the Royal Society in London on March 12, organised by the Foundation for Science and Technology.

Jim Lovell, commander of the ill-fated Apollo 13 mission, said that Obama’s decision would have “catastrophic consequences” for US space exploration.

Last month, Obama cancelled NASA’s Constellation Moon landings programme, approved by ex-President George W Bush.

NASA still aims to send astronauts back to the Moon, but it is likely to take decades and some believe that it will never happen again.

The last man on the Moon, Eugene Cernan, said Obama’s decision was “disappointing”.

As the last astronaut to return to the Apollo 17 lunar module in 1972, Cernan was the last man to set foot on the Moon.

“I’m quite disappointed that I’m still the last man on the Moon. I thought we’d have gone back long before now,” he said.

As to why he believes Americans should go back to the Moon, Cernan said, “I think America has a responsibility to maintain its leadership in technology and its moral leadership to seek knowledge. That’s the essence of human existence.”

It is a view shared by fellow Apollo Astronaut Jim Lovell, the heroic commander of Apollo 13.

“Personally I think it will have catastrophic consequences in our ability to explore space and the spin-offs we get from space technology,” he said.

“They haven’t thought through the consequences,” he added.

Although Cernan and Lovell expressed their dismay with Obama’s decision, Neil Armstrong tactfully avoided the subject. (ANI)

US demand to blame for drug violence: Hillary Clinton

GUATEMALA CITY: Demand for illegal narcotics in the United States is fueling drug violence in Central America, US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has said, acknowledging a measure of US responsibility for what she called a “terrible criminal scourge.”

“The United States under the Obama administration recognises and accepts its share of responsibility for the problems posed by drug trafficking in this region,” she told reporters yesterday ahead of the talks in the Guatemalan capital.

“The demand in the large market in the United States drives the drug trade,” she said. “We know that we are part of the problem and that is an admission that we have been willing make this past year.”

Clinton made the same admission last year on a trip to Mexico, which was then beginning major military operations against drug cartels. At the time, her comments drew fierce criticism from US conservatives who said she was unfairly blaming America for the situation overseas.

Some Republican lawmakers and commentators accused Clinton of blaming America for social and criminal ills in other countries.

They said such admissions were unwarranted. President George W Bush’s administration had tacitly acknowledged the problem of US demand but had always kept the focus on the war on drugs in narcotics producing and trafficking countries.

Obama considers new US nuclear strategy: Report

WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama is making final decisions on a broad new nuclear strategy for the United States that will permanently reduce the US nuclear arsenal by thousands of weapons, The New York Times reported on Monday.

But citing unnamed senior presidential aides, the newspaper said the administration had rejected proposals that the United States declare it would never be the first to use nuclear weapons.

Obama’s new strategy — which would cancel or reverse several initiatives undertaken by the administration of former president George W Bush — will be contained in a nearly completed document called the Nuclear Posture Review, the report said.

Aides said secretary of defense Robert Gates will present Obama with several options on Monday.

Obama’s critics argue that his embrace of a new movement to eliminate nuclear weapons around the world is naive and dangerous, especially at a time of new nuclear threats, particularly from Iran and North Korea, the paper said.

But many of his supporters fear that over the past year he has moved too cautiously, and worry that he will retain the existing US policy by leaving open the possibility that the United States might use nuclear weapons in response to a biological or chemical attack, perhaps against a nation that does not possess a nuclear arsenal, the paper noted.

That is one of the central debates Obama must resolve in the next few weeks, according to his aides.

Many elements of the new strategy have already been completed. As described by senior administration and military officials, the strategy commits the United States to developing no new nuclear weapons, including the nuclear bunker-busters advocated by the Bush administration, The Times said.

Obama has already announced that he will spend billions of dollars more on updating America’s weapons laboratories to assure the reliability of what he intends to be a much smaller arsenal, the paper recalled.

Other officials say that in back-channel discussions with allies, the administration has also been quietly broaching the question of whether to withdraw American tactical nuclear weapons from Europe, where they provide more political reassurance than actual defense, The Times said.

Those weapons are now believed to be in Germany, Italy, Belgium, Turkey and the Netherlands.

At the same time, the new document will steer the United States toward more non-nuclear defenses, according to the report. It relies more heavily on missile defense, much of it arrayed within striking distance of the Gulf, focused on the emerging threat from Iran.

Obama’s recently published Quadrennial Defense Review also includes support for a new class of non-nuclear weapons, called “Prompt Global Strike,” that could be fired from the United States and hit a target anywhere in less than an hour, The Times said.

The idea would be to give the president a non-nuclear option for, say, a large strike on the leadership of al-Qaida in the mountains of Pakistan, or a pre-emptive attack on an impending missile launch from North Korea, the report pointed out.

But under Obama’s strategy, the missiles would be based at new sites around the United States that might even be open to inspection, so that Russia and China would know that a missile launched from those sites was not nuclear, The Times said.