2010 US Census: the count is on

I was standing, holding my young son, looking at my house from outside our front gate. A stranger walked up our garden path and knocked on my door. A woman I didn’t know answered my front door. A woman impeccably dressed as though she’d stepped from a Martha Stewart catalogue. Two perfectly dressed children ran from my front yard to stand by the woman inside my doorway as she talked happily to the stranger.

Outside our fence, I looked at my scruffy shirt, jeans and runners, then at my son’s sauce-stained t-shirt. That’s not real, my head screamed. That’s not me, she’s nothing like me!

A dream? Nope, that’s what actually happened when the US Census circus came to my house. The home of a patriotic Aussie, with a big Australian flag hoisted on the front porch became the quintessential Everyplace, USA.

This is what happens to a TV reporter who retires to the Washington suburbs – after 20 years of asking people if I could film their home/office/families/lives/inner workings, I felt obliged to say yes, when someone finally asked me.

It was a location scout looking for the right house to film for a public service announcement for the 2010 US Census. The white picket fence, the porch swing, not too big, not too small. Like Goldilocks she thought it was just right. What else could I say? It was a good cause. I thought it my civic duty. Besides, they paid.

They started just before 7:00am. We woke to a scraping sound. Peering between the blinds on the front window, I saw two people raking my front yard and a third person hand-picking brown leaves off our hedges.

Suddenly, lush potted plants appeared on our front porch. The wilted blooms dangling from my hanging baskets discreetly disappeared and new, blossom-filled bundles took their place. The Aussie flag was whisked out of sight. A man with a screwdriver was prying the house numbers off our front fence. Camera tracks were being laid down the sidewalk out the front and down the side of our house.

Our wild roses were being hacked back to clear the view. An enormous motor home was parked across the road, a tent was up outside it with costume racks underneath and portable tables were being loaded with coffee urns, hot bagels and fruit for the 26-person crew.

We were barely dressed when the knock came. The director and his entourage wanted to set up a screening room in our basement. Another bank of monitors was being set up in a second tent right outside our house. Parking on our street had been prohibited for the day. Clearly I had underestimated the scope of the US 2010 Census.

The US Department of Commerce is spending $US340 million in an unprecedented outreach program to convince Americans to fill in and send back their 2010 Census form.

Around $US140 million of that is an advertising campaign with ads in 59 languages. During the day of filming at my house, three different women answered my front door to the “census worker” speaking three different languages: Russian, Arabic and Polish. The Russian actor who played “Mother” argued, she didn’t think it was realistic to answer the front door in flat shoes. She insisted she should be wearing high heels. To answer the front door.

You’ve got to have some sympathy for the US Department of Commerce. The census is a once-a-decade chore, mandated by the nation’s founding fathers. There has been a census every decade since 1790 – everyone is supposed to be counted.

The primary function is to determine how to apportion seats in the US House of Representatives among the states. But the end result will help determine how they parcel out $US400 billion worth of federal funding. Schools, emergency services, senior citizen centres, public works and more will be doled out according to “who” and “how many” in every corner of the country.

So, 360 million census questionnaires have been printed and the nation’s largest mobilisation has begun, starting from a remote corner of Alaska, continuing throughout the rest of the United States. Ours arrived this week. According to the Census Bureau, if you were to stack these forms they would stand 29 miles high, five times higher than Mount Everest.

I’m not sure why they’d want to do that though – their job is already hard enough. Suspicion about the census still runs rife. Muslim communities fear it’s an attempt at racial profiling. Hispanic communities worry information will be passed on to immigration officials, though the census doesn’t ask about immigration status.

The hype reached new levels when a US census worker was found dead, gagged, bound and tied to a tree in rural Kentucky last September. Authorities later claimed it was suicide staged to look like murder, for an insurance payout to the worker’s family. But people believed that could happen. It played into the paranoia of the federal government reaching into people’s lives and the extremes that could provoke.

Even members of Congress (and this is supposed to be about accurate representation in Congress) harp about it being a waste of money, especially the advertising campaign.

But if the Census Bureau can convince people to fill it in and post it back, they’ll save enormous sums of money, sending fewer census workers door-to-door to collect the forms. Before the advertising campaigns, the household response was on the decline.

So this is how my house came to be part of the huge advertising machine orchestrated by 14 different ad agencies, combining to convince Americans to send back their census forms, led by the motto: “We Can’t Move Forward Until You Mail It Back.”

Pop stars, Nascar legends, football heroes and others, have all been recruited to help sell the 2010 US Census. Me too, I guess. That’s how I came to be standing outside my own home realising the image of who lived here, didn’t match the reality.

Never mind, it gave the neighbours a laugh – and luckily the only viewers watching will have to understand Russian, Arabic or Polish.

Jill Colgan is an experienced ABC foreign correspondent in Washington.

Indoor plants can reduce toxic ozone levels in offices, homes

Washington, Sept 9 (ANI): Potted plants in the house can make indoor air healthier by cutting down ozone levels, according to a new study.

Ozone, the main component of air pollution, also known as smog, is a highly reactive, colorless gas formed when oxygen reacts with other chemicals.

Although ozone pollution is most often associated with outdoor air, the gas also infiltrates indoor environments through ordinary copy machines, laser printers, ultraviolet lights, and some electrostatic air purification systems, all of which contribute to increased indoor ozone levels.

Exposure to the toxic gas can lead to pulmonary edema, hemorrhage, inflammation, and reduction of lung function.

A research team from the Pennsylvania State University studied the effects of three houseplants such as snake plant, spider plant, and golden pothos, on indoor ozone levels.

To simulate an indoor environment, the researchers set up chambers in a greenhouse equipped with a charcoal filtration air supply system in which ozone concentrations could be measured and regulated.

Ozone was then injected into the chambers, and the chambers were checked every 5 to 6 minutes.

The findings revealed that ozone depletion rates were higher in the chambers that contained plants than in the control chambers without plants, but there were no differences in effectiveness among the three plants.

“Because indoor air pollution extensively affects developing countries, using plants as a mitigation method could serve as a cost-effective tool in the developing world where expensive pollution mitigation technology may not be economically feasible”, said the authors.

The study is published in American Society of Horticultural Science’s journal HortTechnology. (ANI)

Indoor plants could be injurious to health

Washington, Sept 4 (ANI): Potted plants might add a certain aesthetic value to your house, but they are likely to have adverse health effects, suggests a new study.

The research team headed by Stanley J. Kays of the University of Georgia’s Department of Horticulture has shown that these indoor plants actually release volatile organic compounds into the environment.

During the study, they identified and measured the amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by four popular indoor potted plant species Peace Lily, Snake Plant, Weeping Fig and Areca Palm.

Samples of each plant were placed in glass containers with inlet ports connected to charcoal filters to supply purified air and outlet ports connected to traps where volatile emissions were measured.

A total of 23 volatile compounds were found in Peace Lily, 16 in Areca Palm, 13 in Weeping Fig, and 12 in Snake Plant. Some of the VOCs are ingredients in pesticides applied to several species during the production phase.

Other VOCs released did not come from the plant itself, but rather the micro-organisms living in the soil.

“Although micro-organisms in the media have been shown to be important in the removal of volatile air pollutants, they also release volatiles into the atmosphere”, said Kays.

Furthermore, 11 of the VOCs came from the plastic pots containing the plants. Several of these VOCs are known to negatively affect animals.

Interestingly, VOC emission rates were higher during the day than at night in all of the species, and all classes of emissions were higher in the day than at night.

The study concluded, “while ornamental plants are known to remove certain VOCs, they also emit a variety of VOCs, some of which are known to be biologically active.

“The longevity of these compounds has not been adequately studied, and the impact of these compounds on humans is unknown.”

The study is published in the American Society for Horticultural Science journal HortScience. (ANI)

Doormats are health and safety risk, warn Brit council officials

London, Jun 26 (ANI): British families living in a flat block have been told by council officials to remove welcome mats from their porches, as they are a health and safety risk.

The families, at the block in Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffs, have also been told to remove potted plants because they create trip hazards and fire risks.

Residents say that the items have never caused any problems, but council officials claim that if people have to evacuate the properties in the event of a fire they could trip over the obstacles.

Annette Ball, a grandmother who lives at Port Vale Court, said the rules were ridiculous.

“We’ve tried to make our porches homely, but we’re not even allowed to have a picture on the wall,” the Telegraph quoted her as saying.

“We are going to officially appealing against these new rules,” she stated.

The fire regulations came in a year ago, but the latest inspection by Stoke City Council left them with a number of concerns.

John Daniels, the council cabinet member for housing and neighbourhood services, defended the decision.

“Fire regulations that apply to places like Port Vale Court are becoming more stringent every year,” he said.

“Our most recent inspection of these premises showed that items such as pot plants and carpets in the foyers did not comply so we have asked for these items to be removed to make the building safer,” he explained.

Fiona McEvoy, spokesman for council and taxpayer watchdog the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said she could not believe the ban.

“Councils should concern themselves with providing vital public services rather than interfering with the lives of good, honest people,” she said.

“Public money should be spent on thins we really need, not bizarre health and safety whims,” she added. (ANI)

Cash strapped UK Govt. departments castigated for spending 780,000 pounds on flowers

London, Mar. 16 (ANI): British Cabinet ministers have come under fire for spending nearly 780,000 pounds on flowers in the last four years, when UK citizens are struggling with the economic downturn.

The business secretary Lord Peter Mandelson was severely criticized for spending more than 2,000 pounds a month on blooms since his return to the cabinet.

“It seems an extraordinary amount when the rest of the country is feeling the pinch. Peter Mandelson should be putting his energy into protecting business, not into decorating his office,” the Sunday Telegraph quoted, Conservative MP Jeremy Hunt, as saying.

Figures obtained by the Tories disclose that the Department for Children, Schools and Families ran up the largest bill of 174,600 pounds on potted plants and cut flowers.

The Foreign Office came second by spending 106,053 pounds.

The money was spent on providing floral arrangements for official dinners and events, and bouquets for visiting dignitaries such as Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, France’s first lady.

“When times are tough, it is crazy that the Government is spending so much on pot plants. Each department needs to think carefully about whether this sort of spending can be justified. People up and down the country will be outraged at this waste of taxpayers’ money. When everyone is struggling to get by splashing out such vast sums on pot plants is a complete waste,” the shadow culture secretary Hunt, who obtained the figures through parliamentary questions, said.

Others spending heavily on flowers include the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which paid out 79, 871 pounds. The Department of Heath has spent 15,000 pounds since last April. (ANI)