Analysis: Obama may not see big boost from Wall Street reform

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama may struggle to reap political rewards from his big win on Wall Street reform — at least in the near term.

Passage of the most sweeping overhaul of the financial regulatory system since the Great Depression of the 1930s comes as Obama is trying to bolster his sinking poll numbers and avert an election catastrophe for his Democrats.

The financial bill could prove more helpful to Obama when he seeks re-election in 2012 than for Democratic lawmakers trying to keep their seats this November.

Wall Street reform marks the latest in a series of major legislative achievements for the president, who campaigned on a promise of change.

Americans are focused on high unemployment and ballooning budget deficits, and some worry Obama is overreaching with his agenda. That has prevented Obama from gaining a lot of traction from two other signature initiatives: health care reform and the $862 billion stimulus package.

Financial reform could fit the same pattern.

“It will have relatively little positive effect on 2010,” said Ross Baker, a political scientist at Rutgers University. “It’s something Obama can take to the voters in 2012.”

The complexity of the 2,300-page financial reform bill is one reason Baker says it might not help Democrats much in the November congressional elections.

“It has yet to play out and affect the lives of Americans,” Baker said. “It will be a long time before people get a sense that somehow their debit cards are better protected than they were before financial regulation reform was passed.”

BILL UNFAMILIAR

Many U.S. voters are unfamiliar with the financial overhaul, according to an Ipsos Public Affairs online poll.

The poll found 38 percent of Americans had never heard of the overhaul and 33 percent had heard of it but knew almost nothing about the legislation. Another 18 percent said they knew “a little bit” about it.

The healthcare measure is also complex, though Baker said voters might come to better appreciate both pieces of legislation by the time Obama seeks re-election in two years.

For now, the jobless rate, which stands at 9.5 percent, trumps healthcare and financial reform.

“If he can get job creation going and we start seeing a decline in unemployment, that’s really the only thing that’s going to rescue Obama and the Democrats,” said Chris Arterton, a political scientist at George Washington University.

That may be why Obama focused his weekly radio and Internet address on Saturday on his push for extensions in jobless benefits and a program to spur lending to small businesses.

The Senate scheduled a vote on the unemployment benefits on Tuesday — the day before the signing of financial reform.

The White House has openly expressed fear that Democrats could lose their dominance in the House of Representatives.

Democrats are seen as having a better chance of holding onto the Senate though they are expected to lose seats. That would make it harder for Obama to tackle other items on his agenda like energy and immigration legislation.

The White House depicts the financial reform debate as a choice: Setting responsible rules of the road for Wall Street versus allowing greed and recklessness to run rampant.

Obama has argued Wall Street must be reined in to protect consumers and prevent a repeat of the financial implosion that plunged the country into its longest recession in decades.

CREDIT CARD FINE PRINT

Senior Obama aide David Axelrod disagreed with those who see the financial bill as too complex to resonate with voters.

“I don’t think it’s complicated to tell credit card holders that they have new rights relative to their credit card companies or mortgage holders that their prepayment penalties are now limited,” Axelrod said.

“I understand that not everybody is steeped in the knowledge of derivatives and all of this kind of exotic instruments that were part of the saga of the financial crisis,” he added. “But everybody in America deals with the headache of credit card fine print and variable mortgages.”

The Wall Street measure passed almost entirely along party lines, with only three Republicans breaking ranks to back it.

One obstacle for Democrats is a dampening of liberal enthusiasm because of concerns that industry lobbyists won too many concessions and loopholes in the final bill.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, an outside adviser to Obama, was disappointed in a rule named after him to prohibit banks with federal deposit insurance from betting with their own money. Volcker felt the rule was too watered-down.

But Republicans are prepared to attack the financial bill from a different vantage point. They hope that the bill and Obama’s populist, anti-Wall Street rhetoric will reinforce an “anti-business” image they are trying to pin on him.

House of Representatives Republican leader John Boehner has called the financial legislation ill-conceived and said he wants to repeal it.

“It’s going to make credit harder for the American people to get, clearly harder for businesses to get,” Boehner said. “It’s going to punish every banker in America for the sins of a few on Wall Street.”

(Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro; Editing by Xavier Briand)

Bill Clinton aims to help Democrats retain Congress

(Reuters) – Bill “The Comeback Kid” Clinton is trying to help fellow Democrats rebound from poor public opinion ratings and retain control of the U.S. Congress in November 2 elections.

Politics | Natural Disasters

The former president helped Senator Blanche Lincoln overcome anti-incumbent fervor and win a bruising Democratic primary in their home state of Arkansas on June 8.

Last month, Clinton provided a hand in snuffing out Republican hopes of picking up a seat in the House of Representatives from Pennsylvania by stumping for Mark Critz, the Democrat who went on to win the race.

“A lot of people still like Bill Clinton, particularly Democrats,” said Quinnipiac University pollster Peter Brown. “They remember the Clinton years as prosperous and relatively peaceful.”

A Democratic Party aide said scores of House and Senate candidates have requested help from Clinton, who left office in 2001 with the U.S. enjoying record budget surpluses that have since become record deficits.

Clinton campaigned this month for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid as he fights for political survival in Nevada, and has helped Senate Democratic candidates in Florida and New York.

“We’re going to take as much of Bill Clinton as we can get,” said Senator Robert Menendez, the Senate Democratic campaign chairman. “No one can deliver a message better.”

While Clinton may give Democrats a boost, analysts say they do not expect him to end voter ire about the ailing economy and immunize his party against anticipated Election Day loses.

‘HE’S STILL TOXIC’

And they note that, particularly in Republican-dominated areas, Clinton could do Democrats more harm than good.

“Bill Clinton can’t be used everywhere. In some places, he’s still toxic,” said Paul Light, a political scientist at New York University.

Clinton earned the moniker “Comeback Kid” in his 1992 campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination. A sex scandal nearly knocked him out, but he rallied to capture the White House.

He presided over relative peace and prosperity, yet his presidency was hit by another sex scandal that threatened to drive him from office. He survived and ended his second term in 2001 with a public approval rating of more than 60 percent.

But the sex scandals, the investigation of the Clintons’ investment in a failed real estate deal and the first lady’s ill-fated foray into healthcare reform helped make Clinton some inveterate enemies among conservative Republicans.

Democrats currently control the U.S. Senate and the House. The entire House and 36 Senate seats are up for grabs in the November elections. With opinion polls showing Congress with an approval rating of only about 25 percent, Republicans are expected to gain seats, but it is unclear if they will take control of either chamber.

Clinton’s own stock dipped during the campaign for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination that saw Barack Obama defeat Hillary Clinton.

Relations between the former and current president had become strained. But they improved after the former first lady became Obama’s secretary of state.

Last year, Bill Clinton went to Capitol Hill to help win passage of Obama’s plan to revamp the U.S. healthcare system.

‘BACK FROM THE BRINK’

“We’ve made real progress already — from bringing our economy back from the brink to delivering dramatic health insurance reform,” Clinton wrote in a recent letter to raise funds for House Democrats.

Clinton, 63, has remained on the world stage, largely with humanitarian efforts, including visits to Haiti early this year to help victims of the poor country’s devastating earthquake.

He has been slowed, but not stopped, since 2004 by a pair of heart surgeries, the most recent in February to open a blocked artery.

While Democrats embrace Clinton, Republicans avoid former Republican President George W. Bush. He left office in January 2009 with an approval rating about half that of Clinton’s.

Senator John Cornyn, the Senate Republican campaign committee chairman, said Democrats’ election-year problems are bigger than Clinton.

“What’s going to be an albatross around the neck of Democrats in November is the unpopular policies, spending and debt that people are responding to in dramatic fashion,” Cornyn said.

But Cornyn conceded Clinton can be a good fund-raiser. “The amount of money that a former president can help raise is something that I’m worried about,” he said.

(Additional reporting by Steve Holland; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

Analyst’s View: Flemish separatists set for Belgian election win

(Reuters) – The Flemish separatist N-VA party was on course for victory in Belgium’s parliamentary election on Sunday.

World

Economists have said that Belgium can ill afford drawn-out coalition talks given its high level of debt.

The following are comments by economists and political analysts.

RUDI THOMAES, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF BELGIAN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION FEB

“For business, we are looking for a government soon, mainly because of a number of time-sensitive issues. An example is the energy issue — what we want is a quick reconfirmation of the decision on nuclear power.

“The previous government decided to prolong the lifetime of three nuclear power plants but the law was not adopted by the parliament so we are back at square one and the new government needs again to decide on such an issue.

“Then we have issues on taxes for electricity. It is very important that they are lowered as soon as possible and of course if you have no government you cannot decide on these things and that is of course urgent.

“I would say we have the same basic issue on the table today as three years ago. What I hope is that … the French-speaking politicians have indicated today more than three years ago that they are willing to negotiate.

“During the campaign it was made clear that they are willing to negotiate so I hope this is possible. It all depends on the ability of N-VA to reach an agreement.”

TONY VALCKE, POLITICAL SCIENTIST, UNIVERSITY OF GHENT

“The results are clear, not just in Flanders but also in Wallonia. People want clear solutions.

“It will not take half a year (for the parties) to come to an agreement. It could be in August that we have an agreement.

“There have been rumors in the press, already even before the elections, that there have been talks between the different parties. It’s clear they have to talk to each other.

“They will need to have a two-thirds majority, they will need to have the Green party too.

“It will take some weeks, maybe two months, I presume at the end of the summer season (that we will have an agreement).

“Because of the situation and the financial markets, these will convince the parties not to delay in forming a government. This will give them the incentive to take the initiative and not delay.”

MARC SWYNGEDOUW, PROFESSOR AT CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN

“It is clear that the ball is with N-VA and that it’s for them to form a government.

“They have said they want a government with a majority in Flanders. I think they will join with the Christian Democrats and probably the SP.A (Flemish socialists) as well, as we have in the Flemish government.

“We’re looking at a Belgian government with possibly eight parties.

“Belgium is not about to split up, but it is set for a reorganization.

“We have the presidency of the European Union coming up in a matter of weeks. Everyone is aware that we don’t want to damage our image.

“N-VA is in a difficult position. They have scored a huge election victory, but what they must do now is find a compromise. It has to deliver.

“There’s no party on the French side that has said it does not wish a reform of the state, but we have to see if they can work with (N-VA leader Bart) De Wever. The N-VA were the arch-enemies before.

ETIENNE DE CALLATAY, ECONOMIST AT BANK DEGROOF

“It would surprise me if bond spreads increase on Monday. It’s the confirmation of what we expected. But it could mean that they continue to rise a bit in relation to other European countries.

“The coalition will take a long time. It will take a long time to get an agreement.

“In Belgium it will be difficult to take austerity measures for several months which would mean that we could fall behind other countries in regard to structural reform.”

PHILIPPE LEDENT, ING ECONOMIST

“If the N-VA continues to be extremist in its position, then the game will be very different for other parties. Then it will take much more time to find a majority.

“The most important thing is not which majority we will have. The biggest thing is the question of time, how long do we have to wait before we have a new majority. This is the most important element.

“For the economic situation, it is important to have a new government as soon as possible.

“In this context, I would say finding a new government which is very important for the economy, will depend clearly on N-VA’s attitude.

“I will not characterize the situation as blocked.

“N-VA could have a constructive attitude. We could also have N-VA wanting to stay on its extreme situation, this could lead to a difficult situation for the Belgian economy.

“The most important element is find a majority as soon as possible.

“After September, the reaction of the financial markets would lead to difficult consequences for the Belgian economy.

“I think in the short run, I’m not sure (financial markets’) reaction will be too important. Everybody knew the N-VA would be the biggest party in Flanders, that it would be the biggest winner in the elections.”

“In the medium-term, when negotiations start, if it becomes clear that N-VA stays on its extremist position, then the impact can be more important.”

(Reporting by Ben Deighton, Foo Yun Chee, Philip Blenkinsop)

LTTE poses threat to Indian VVIPs

Colombo, May 26 — The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) might be militarily decimated in Sri Lanka but big neighbour India is not taking any chance. It recently extended the ban against LTTE as an “unlawful association” capable even now of jeopardising “VVIP security” and compromising India’s “territorial integrity.” The notification’s mention of LTTE’s goal of creating a “Tamil homeland” is interesting. “And, Whereas, the LTTE’s objective for a separate homeland (Tamil Eelam) for all Tamils threatens the sovereignty and territorial integrity of India, and amounts to cession and secession of a part of the territory of India from the Union,” the gazette notification said. So, it means that the LTTE’s larger goal – at least according to the Indian government which once trained and nurtured the LTTE – was to carve out a separate country for Tamils comprising members of the community from across the shallow waters of the Palk Strait. Intriguingly, it added that while the LTTE remnants look upon the Sri Lankan government as “enemies” they look upon the Indian government as “traitors” – or those who were once trusted but have betrayed that trust.

A political scientist in Colombo said India’s “very specific” fears were not surprising and the extension of the ban was expected.

Hungary’s Orban stages big comeback, faces tough job

(Reuters) – Viktor Orban is on the cusp of the most sweeping election victory any Hungarian politician has achieved since the country’s transition to democracy — and the toughest challenge of his career as a politician.

World

Orban’s center-right Fidesz party, which was in power under Orban’s leadership as prime minister between 1998-2002, has a good chance of gaining two-thirds of seats in Hungary’s next parliament based on results of the first round of elections on Sunday in which Fidesz won 206 seats of the total 386.

This could give Fidesz a strong enough mandate to rewrite basic laws and launch deep state reforms that are essential for putting Hungary back on track to sustainable and fast economic growth after a deep recession last year.

The charismatic and resilient leader of the conservative right, Orban, still only 46, has made a remarkable comeback after two lost elections in 2002 and 2006.

After eight years Fidesz has ousted the Socialist Party, which Orban denounces as unpatriotic, corrupt and dishonest communists who nearly destroyed the country.

“Today Hungarians again raised their head and condemned a whole era … In 2010, they drew a line under an era which has failed and chose unity, order and safety,” Orban told cheering supporters on Sunday night after declaring victory.

Orban ran a cautious campaign that steered clear of details on how he would cut taxes and “create 1 million jobs in 10 years” as he sought to leverage his party’s high popularity ratings ahead of the vote.

He has been extremely careful on taking a stand on anything that may damage him or his party, but he will need to quickly lay out a consistent and credible strategy after the second round of elections on April 25.

“He will face by far the biggest task of his career,” political scientist Peter Tolgyessy told weekly Magyar Narancs prior to the vote.

“After the election he will have to decide within a couple of weeks about the strategy of his government, in a way which will determine his four-year term,” he added.

LONG TERM STRATEGIST

Orban will have to live up to voters’ hopes of bringing a palpable improvement in their lives and in the economy and he will also have to lay out an economic plan acceptable to international lenders, the IMF and the EU whose financing line kept the country afloat after the October 2008 solvency crisis.

“Orban’s political room for manoeuvre will be much bigger, but this also means a danger as every possible failure in governing will also be his failure,” said Peter Kreko, analyst at Political Capital.

Orban rose to fame when, in 1989, he stood up and demanded Soviet troops get out of Hungary during a ceremony for the reburial of former prime minister Imre Nagy, who led an anti-Soviet uprising.

Since the first post-communist democratic election in 1990, when his liberal party first got into parliament, he has transformed Fidesz into a mainstream conservative group appealing mostly to the middle class and entrepreneurs.

When he lost the 2006 vote to the Socialists, the second parliamentary election defeat in a row, some analysts doubted Orban would ever be able to climb back and win again.

But no one in Fidesz has ever seriously challenged his position as a leader, even in the most difficult times.

He is seen as a pragmatic politician, but with a combative style that could lead to squabbles with some of Hungary’s neighbors such as Slovakia — and also Brussels.

A conservative icon on the right who is able to take tens of thousands of supporters to the streets, Orban is seen by many of his opponents on the left as a control-freak and populist.

A trained lawyer who studied political philosophy at Oxford University, Orban is a strategist planning for the long term.

In a speech in late 2009 he envisaged that the next 15-20 years of Hungarian politics could be defined by “one central political force” instead of the dual system of the past years.

A keen amateur soccer player Orban appeals to many ordinary Hungarians with his down-to-earth approach.

Born on May 31, 1963, to a farming family in the village of Alcsutdoboz, Orban is married with five children.

(Writing by Krisztina Than; Editing by Alison Williams)

NEWSMAKER-Hungary’s Orban stages big comeback, faces tough job

BUDAPEST, April 12 (Reuters) – Viktor Orban is on the cusp of the most sweeping election victory any Hungarian politician has achieved since the country’s transition to democracy — and the toughest challenge of his career as a politician.

Orban’s centre-right Fidesz party, which was in power under Orban’s leadership as prime minister between 1998-2002, has a good chance of gaining two-thirds of seats in Hungary’s next parliament based on results of the first round of elections on Sunday in which Fidesz won 206 seats of the total 386.

This could give Fidesz a strong enough mandate to rewrite basic laws and launch deep state reforms that are essential for putting Hungary back on track to sustainable and fast economic growth after a deep recession last year.

The charismatic and resilient leader of the conservative right, Orban, still only 46, has made a remarkable comeback after two lost elections in 2002 and 2006.

After eight years Fidesz has ousted the Socialist Party, which Orban denounces as unpatriotic, corrupt and dishonest communists who nearly destroyed the country.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

For a full menu of stories, click on [nLDE63107B]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

“Today Hungarians again raised their head and condemned a whole era … In 2010, they drew a line under an era which has failed and chose unity, order and safety,” Orban told cheering supporters on Sunday night after declaring victory.

Orban ran a cautious campaign that steered clear of details on how he would cut taxes and “create 1 million jobs in 10 years” as he sought to leverage his party’s high popularity ratings ahead of the vote.

He has been extremely careful on taking a stand on anything that may damage him or his party, but he will need to quickly lay out a consistent and credible strategy after the second round of elections on April 25.

“He will face by far the biggest task of his career,” political scientist Peter Tolgyessy told weekly Magyar Narancs prior to the vote.

“After the election he will have to decide within a couple of weeks about the strategy of his government, in a way which will determine his four-year term,” he added.

LONG TERM STRATEGIST

Orban will have to live up to voters’ hopes of bringing a palpable improvement in their lives and in the economy and he will also have to lay out an economic plan acceptable to international lenders, the IMF and the EU whose financing line kept the country afloat after the October 2008 solvency crisis.

“Orban’s political room for manoeuvre will be much bigger, but this also means a danger as every possible failure in governing will also be his failure,” said Peter Kreko, analyst at Political Capital.

Orban rose to fame when, in 1989, he stood up and demanded Soviet troops get out of Hungary during a ceremony for the reburial of former prime minister Imre Nagy, who led an anti-Soviet uprising.

Since the first post-communist democratic election in 1990, when his liberal party first got into parliament, he has transformed Fidesz into a mainstream conservative group appealing mostly to the middle class and entrepreneurs.

When he lost the 2006 vote to the Socialists, the second parliamentary election defeat in a row, some analysts doubted Orban would ever be able to climb back and win again.

But no one in Fidesz has ever seriously challenged his position as a leader, even in the most difficult times.

He is seen as a pragmatic politician, but with a combative style that could lead to squabbles with some of Hungary’s neighbours such as Slovakia — and also Brussels.

A conservative icon on the right who is able to take tens of thousands of supporters to the streets, Orban is seen by many of his opponents on the left as a control-freak and populist.

A trained lawyer who studied political philosophy at Oxford University, Orban is a strategist planning for the long term.

In a speech in late 2009 he envisaged that the next 15-20 years of Hungarian politics could be defined by “one central political force” instead of the dual system of the past years.

A keen amateur soccer player Orban appeals to many ordinary Hungarians with his down-to-earth approach.

Born on May 31, 1963, to a farming family in the village of Alcsutdoboz, Orban is married with five children. (Writing by Krisztina Than; Editing by Alison Williams)

Anti-Washington message propels Perry in Texas

* Incumbent Governor Perry beats challenger Hutchison

Bonds | Global Markets

* His anti-Washington rhetoric may shape other races

DALLAS, March 3 (Reuters) – Conservative incumbent Rick Perry rode strong anti-Washington rhetoric to a victory over a sitting U.S. senator for the Texas Republican gubernatorial nomination in a race that could be a model in this year’s crucial U.S. mid-term congressional elections.

“We’re taking our country back — one vote at a time, one election at a time,” Texas Governor Perry told supporters after handily defeating U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison in a bruising primary election on Tuesday.

“This election was about hard-working Texans sending a simple, compelling message to Washington: quit spending all the money, stop trying to take over our lives and our businesses,” Perry added.

His primary win showed that an anti-Washington message can resonate in the unsettled U.S. political atmosphere. Many Republicans hope to tap into this sentiment in their bid to wrest control of Congress from President Barack Obama’s Democrats in November’s congressional elections.

Perry will face former Houston Mayor Bill White in the November general election. White beat Houston businessman Farouk Shami in the Democratic primary.

After trailing Hutchison in initial polls in 2009, Perry surged to a commanding lead by mobilizing his party’s most conservative members and harnessing disenchantment with Obama and Washington politics.

“I think the message is pretty clear — conservatism has never been stronger than it is today,” Perry said on Tuesday night in Driftwood.

Perry is especially popular with social and religious conservatives, who comprise a key base for the Republican Party nationwide but especially in the red-meat state of Texas.

“Perry thrashed Hutchison, suggesting that social conservatism, traditionally about two-thirds of the Republican primary vote in Texas, remains ascendant,” said Cal Jillson, a political scientist at Southern Methodist University in Dallas.

After conceding the race, Hutchison, a U.S. senator since 1993, urged her supporters to unite behind Perry’s candidacy. Perry’s portrayal of her as a Washington insider largely stuck, analysts said.

(Writing by Will Dunham, editing by Vicki Allen)

‘Pak army’s desire to kill Indians, spare Pakistanis makes them ineffective against Taliban’

Lahore, June 30 (ANI): Pakistan Army’s desire to kill Indians and spare Pakistanis is making them ineffective against the Pak-Taliban, senior political scientist Christine Fair has said.

The Daily Times quoted Fair of the RAND Corporation, as saying that several Pakistani officers had told her they had joined the army to kill Indians, not Pakistanis.

The army’s officers are themselves unsure if they can successfully oust the Taliban, and whether they can hold the area for long, Fair wrote in a Wall Street Journal report.

Hence, she said, the Pak army could not be used in the war on terror.

She also noted that the US should not have spent most of 12 billion dollars trying to aid the Pakistan Army, instead the aid should have been used to improve the country’s police force.

She added that the Pakistan Army’s “sledgehammer attempt” to expel the Taliban, flattening villages and forcing more than three million people to flee, had also shown the army has resisted developing an effective counter-insurgency capability to secure the local population.

Referring to the killing of 400 Pakistani policemen by the Taliban every year, she said the police force was a greater threat to the insurgents than the Army.

“The police make for easy targets because they are outgunned, under-resourced, inadequately equipped and poorly trained,” she said, noting that several had fled to protect their families because they don’t have the same lucrative death benefits as army personnel. (ANI)

“Twittering” in German parliament causes outrage

Berlin – Germany’s presidential election last Saturday, in which incumbent Horst Koehler won a second term, may well go down as the breakthrough moment in Germany for social networking site Twitter.

While few were surprised at the outcome of the vote, the manner in which the result became known has been causing a political stir.

Roughly 15 minutes before the official announcement, two parliamentarians posted the result on the Twitter website, informing media-savvy internet users of Koehler’s re-election.

“Guys, you can calmly watch the football, the election was successful,” Christian Democrat (CDU) delegate Julia Kloeckner wrote, after the brass band arrived to play the national anthem – making it clear the decision had been cast.

Her Social Democrat colleague Ulrich Kelber also posted a Twitter message, announcing that Koehler had achieved the necessary majority of 613 votes, a good 15 minutes before the Parliamentary President Norbert Lammert proclaimed the winner.

Twitter is the latest in a series of internet sites enabling individuals to communicate with the masses, bypassing traditional media. The site allows users to send text messages which are instantly published.

Twitters can range from the inane (“Thinking what to make for tea”) to eyewitness updates of breaking news, as happened during last December’s Mumbai bombings, when a constant stream of Twitter messages gave real-time insight as events unfolded.

New media sites such as blogs, YouTube and Facebook are already being embraced by politicians on both sides of the Atlantic.

US President Barack Obama has more than 6 million Facebook “friends.” And the office of British Premier Gordon Brown is a regular Twitter user.

In Germany however, the phenomenon is far less widespread.

“New media got off to a slow start in Germany,” says Nils Diederich, a political scientist at Berlin’s Free University, adding that internet use in Germany is far less widespread than is generally assumed.

Diederich believes Germans are starting to see the advantages of new media tools in unseating the traditional monopoly on information enjoyed by those in power.

“The possibility of fast communication is a means to democratically disseminate information,” the professor said.

“In certain situations, the use of modern forms of communication by all and sundry threatens the control of the mighty vis-à-vis the less mighty,” Diederich added. This, he said, presented a risk to politicians.

Kloeckner and Kelber have come under heavy criticism for preempting the announcement of Saturday’s presidential election result.

The parliamentary leader of Bavaria’s Christian Social Union (CSU) Peter Ramsauer said: “I have no sympathy for such things, as it ultimately undermines the dignity of the parliament.”

Such criticism could be seen as the defiant voice of politicians faced with an army of citizen journalists, equipped with new media tools capable of derailing their control of the political agenda.

Diederich, who spent 18 years in parliament, thinks in this instance there is a simpler reason for the outrage, as the incident ultimately represented “a breach of the parliamentary code of conduct.”

“It devalues the role of the plenum of the Federal Convention if they don’t receive the result from the parliamentary president, but from an arbitrary communication running in parallel,” Diederich said.

The Federal Convention is the body which meets once every five years with the sole purpose of nominating the new president.

It was nothing new for members of parliament to perform such “indiscretions” as a way of drawing attention, Diederich added.

“The new media will do less to change the foundations of politics, but rather they will affect the style and intensity with which political issues are communicated,” Diederich concluded. (dpa)

Political blogs considered more credible than newspapers

Washington, May 17 (ANI): People who regularly follow political blogs and regular news media tend to believe that the content on blogs is more accurate, according to a book by a Brigham Young University political scientist.

Professor Richard Davis’ ‘Typing Politics’, the new book published by Oxford University Press also showed that journalists tend to follow the liberal blogosphere more closely despite equal awareness of conservative blogs.

“Blog readers still get most of their news from regular news sources, but they are concerned that they are not getting the whole side of the story there. They suspect habitual bias in the traditional news content,” said Davis.

For his research, Davis studied daily blog readers from a nationally representative sample and found that just 3 percent got most of their news from blogs.

He discovered that a majority of readers still got their information from traditional news organizations, despite some bloggers’ predictions that they would entirely replace traditional media.

Instead. Davis said that blogs have become an echo chamber that extends the shelf life of news stories.

Professional journalists and political bloggers have different takes on accuracy in the world of political news-while the former pursue objectivity, the latter openly dole out their personal opinions.

Still, political bloggers have an edge with shared readers when it comes to the trust factor, what with 30 percent participants in the study thinking that blogs are more accurate.

Eight percent of readers said traditional media are more accurate, 40 percent said they’re about equal and 21 percent were not sure.

Davis also questioned over 200 journalists to learn how they use blog content in their coverage of political news.

And he found that a majority of journalists were aware of influential blogs on both sides of the political spectrum, such as Daily Kos and Talking Points on the left and Michelle Malkin and Instapundit on the right.

But, despite equal awareness, journalists spend more time reading posts in the liberal blogosphere.

“When journalists take story ideas from blogs, those ideas naturally will come from blogs they read. These reading patterns suggest journalists may be getting primarily one view of the blogosphere,” said Davis. (ANI)

India faces multiple threats from multiple groups: Rand study

Washington, Apr.16 (ANI): An imploding nuclear-armed Pakistan torn apart by militant groups, economic woes and sectarian tension poses an extraordinary danger to India because of spill-over effects, including effects on India’s economy and its own Muslim population, says a Rand Corporation study.

According to Seth G. Jones, a political scientist at RAND and author of “In the Graveyard of Empires: America’s War in Afghanistan,” while there is good reason for India and its neighbours to be concerned, there is considerable misunderstanding of the threat.

“Referring to it as one orchestrated by the “Taliban” is fundamentally misplaced. In reality, there is no single organization involved (and certainly not an overarching one called the “Taliban”), but a series of networks, which are dispersed, small and which allow individuals to communicate, coordinate and conduct their campaigns with little precise central command,” he says.

Accurately describing these groups is important to formulating an effective response. A hierarchical “Taliban” with a clear command and control structure would lead to a relatively straightforward response: capture or kill the core leadership (a “decapitation” strategy), he opines.

But the networked nature of Pakistan militant groups requires a “networked strategy” that hinges on countering the groups in their areas using local police and intelligence agencies to gather information and penetrate the organizations. To attack the threat, there has to be a willingness to operate at the small-unit level and a deeper understanding of its structure, he concludes. (ANI)

Ex-New York Guv Spitzer’s return to public stage stirs talk of political comeback

New York, Apr.13 (ANI): Disgraced former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer’s return to the public stage, with articles on Wall Street’s role in the economic crisis and interviews on TV and radio, has led some observers to suggest conditions now are better than ever for him to return to the limelight — if he wants to.

“I don’t think he’s interested in a political comeback at this point. I think he’s now at a point where he can move on with his career It’s time to speak out. … He feels a need to make a public contribution. This is a perfect opportunity for him to enter the public debate,” Fox News quoted Mark Weingarten, a Democratic Party activist and friend of Spitzer, as saying.

As New York’s top attorney for eight years, Spitzer sent chills up the spine of people on Wall Street with investigations of white-collar crime, including a fraud case against insurance giant AIG, which led to the resignation of CEO Maurice “Hank” Greenberg and a 1.6 billion dollar settlement.

Spitzer was elected governor by a wide margin in 2006, but he resigned in disgrace in March 2008 when it was revealed he was “Client 9″ of a Washington, D.C., prostitution ring.

Recently he has returned with articles on the Wall Street’s role in the economic crisis and interviews on TV and radio.

But Douglas A. Muzzio, a political scientist at Baruch College and an expert on New York politics, said it would be “real difficult” for Spitzer to mount a political comeback.

“It’s not only his problems as Client 9 but his problem as the …steamroller,” he said, referring to Spitzer’s vow to roll over opponents of his agenda as governor.

Muzzio said that although Spitzer may never be able to win elected office again, he could be appointed to a study commission or advisory council.

Since December, Spitzer has written a column for Slate, offering a critique of the financial crisis, and granted his first interviews since falling from grace last year. (ANI)

In age of alliances, small Indian parties play big role

Grandmaster-level chess is a snap compared to the calculations and combinations involved in India’s 15th general election.

Seven national parties, 47 regional parties and more than 400 smaller parties are engaged in frenetic activity, building and breaking pre-poll ties in efforts to come up with a winning combination in the mammoth electoral exercise beginning April 16.

The Indian National Congress party, which played the lead role in India’s freedom movement and after its independence in 1947, has held a parliamentary majority for 30 years.

But that is history, as are the years when a cohesive opposition put up a spirited fight against Congress.

No single party has won a majority of 272 seats in India’s 545-member Lok Sabha, or lower house of Parliament, since 1984.

For most of the past two decades India has been ruled by coalition governments of multiple parties, often unstable and unable to pull together through a full five-year term.

The shrinking clout of the two main national parties, Congress and its rival Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has come back-to-back with the growing power of regional and smaller parties.

These myriad parties represent India’s diversity and the sectional aspirations of communities who identify themselves according to their region, language, caste and community.

Many analysts see the proliferation of these smaller parties as a natural progression of Indian democracy – the expression of regional, caste and other identities that were suppressed in the first 40 years of independence.

“The entire business of regionalism is good for the polity,” said political scientist Yogendra Yadav of the Delhi-based Centre for the Study of Developing Societies. “We keep thinking as if it’s Britain. We have to begin thinking of ourselves as Europe.”

The state-level parties represent distinct languages and cultures and some of them, with populations of 20 million to 120 million, are like large countries, Yadav added.

The presence of strong state-level parties in Parliament, their participation in, or support to, a coalition federal government makes policy-making and governance more democratic.

A recent opinion poll by the India Today newsmagazine suggests the 15th general election is set for a photo-finish with not two but three fronts sharing the bulk of seats in near equal measure.

The two main alliances are the governing United Progressive Alliance (UPA), led by Congress, and the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), led by the BJP. Both have run stable coalition governments for five-year terms.

Going into the 2009 election, both the UPA and the NDA have lost some allies but hope to regain them and win others if they do well.

The third front comprises a still changing group of smaller parties, which includes regional aspirants from southern India and leftist parties.

It is not yet clear whether the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) – representing Dalit or lower caste voters – which is a national party with its voter base restricted largely to the politically important northern Uttar Pradesh state, will go with the third front.

But both the BSP, led by Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati, and the left grouping are hoping to get numbers that give them a say in the formation of the federal government.

The leader of the single-largest party in the Lok Sabha is usually invited to form the government but has to prove that he or she has the support of a majority of lawmakers.

Some constituents of the UPA and the NDA have been hobnobbing with third front organizers and have indicated they may switch allegiance after the elections, depending on who scores what.

Just to give an idea of how fluid the ground realities are in the pre-election electoral tie-ups scene, a group of three parties, two of which are constituents of the UPA and one a supporter, have formed an alliance within the Alliance in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar states from which the Congress party has been kept out.

Both the Congress and BJP leaderships are dismissive of the third front and talk of a resurgence by their parties.

Off the record, leaders are more realistic. They accept that there could be a lot of arithmetic ahead, not much of it based on ideology.

The leaders claim, and this is supported by analysts, that it would be difficult to form a stable federal coalition government without the support of either the Congress party or the BJP.

The leftist parties, who are leading the third front initiative, want a non-Congress, non-BJP government. And, they insist it can be stable.

“You need to work out a common minimum programme of all the parties and stick to it,” Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader Brinda Karat said.

At the end of the day, it looks like coalitions are a given. Pre-poll parleys aimed at winning votes are expected to give way to hard bargaining for post-poll alliances aimed at forming a government once results are announced on May 16. (dpa)

13 most powerful UK Muslim women revealed

London, Mar.21 (ANI): More Muslim women than ever are in leading positions in British society.

There are more than 100,000 Muslim women currently working in Britain, yet many feel misunderstood and misrepresented. Britain’s first Muslim Women Power List aims to change all that. Following are the 13 most powerful Muslim women in the United Kingdom.

1. Farmida Bi, 41, partner, International Securities Group, Norton Rose

2. Mishal Husain, 36, presenter, BBC One and BBC World News

3. Sabina Iqbal, 33, chair/founder Deaf Parenting UK

4. Imtaz Khaliq, 44, bespoke tailor

5. Baroness Warsi, 37, Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion and Social Action

6. Professor Farida Fortune, in her forties, dean of dentistry and professor of medicine in

7. Bushra Nasir, 56, first Muslim state-school head teacher

8. Dr G|lnur Aybet, 44, lecturer in international relations, political scientist and principal investigator of a British Academy project on Nato and EU state-building in Bosnia

9. Mehmuda Mian, 46, BBC trustee, qualified solicitor and commissioner of the Independent Police Complaints Commission

10. Salma Yaqoob, 37, leader of the Respect political party and elected member of Birmingham City Council

11. Rimla Akhtar, 26, chairwoman of the Muslim Women’s Sport Foundation

12. Zahida Manzoor CBE, 50, legal services complaints commissioner and legal services ombudsman for England and Wales

13. Dr Reefat Drabu Various chairs/committee work within Muslim Council of Britain (ANI)

Happiness is contagious, research finds

A study of the relationships of nearly 5,000 people tracked for decades in the Framingham Heart Study shows that good cheer spreads through social networks of nearby family, friends and neighbors.

They say misery loves company, but the same may be even more true of happiness.
In a study published online today in the British Medical Journal, scientists from Harvard University and UC San Diego showed that happiness spreads readily through social networks of family members, friends and neighbors.

Knowing someone who is happy makes you 15.3% more likely to be happy yourself, the study found. A happy friend of a friend increases your odds of happiness by 9.8%, and even your neighbor’s sister’s friend can give you a 5.6% boost.

“Your emotional state depends not just on actions and choices that you make, but also on actions and choices of other people, many of which you don’t even know,” said Dr. Nicholas A. Christakis, a physician and medical sociologist at Harvard who co-wrote the study.

The research is part of a growing trend to measure well-being as a crucial component of public health. Scientists have documented that people who describe themselves as happy are likely to live longer, even if they have a chronic illness.

The new study “has serious implications for our understanding of the determinants of health and for the design of policies and interventions,” wrote psychologist Andrew Steptoe of University College London and epidemiologist Ana Diez Roux of University of Michigan in an accompanying editorial.

Christakis and UCSD political scientist James H. Fowler examined the relationships of nearly 5,000 people who were tracked for decades as part of the landmark Framingham Heart Study.

They discovered that happy people in close geographic proximity were most effective in spreading their good cheer. They also found the happiest people were at the center of large social networks.

In many regards, they concluded, happiness is like a contagious disease.

“We know people who are most susceptible to HIV are people who have lots of partners,” Fowler said. “This is the same thing.”

This isn’t the first evidence that emotions can spread like a virus. Studies have found that waiters who offer service with a smile are rewarded with bigger tips. On the flip side, having a mildly depressed roommate made college freshmen increasingly depressed themselves.

Pak-Americans seek Obama’s to support for reforms in Pakistan

Washington, Mar. 13 (ANI): Several Pakistani-American organizations have urged President Obama to support their call for an independent judiciary and other constitutional reforms in Pakistan.

Members of Pakistan American National Alliance gathered at Capitol Hill on Wednesday to voice support for the national protest, The Nation reports.

They also held a symbolic Long March and a demonstration outside the Pakistan Embassy in Washington, carrying placards to register their protest over what they called the ruling party’s reluctance to restore judges deposed by Musharraf.

“At this time, if America is on the wrong side of history, that will be disastrous. So we are very concerned; we want to make sure our (US) government understands the stakes and is not seen opposing the independent judiciary,” said Agha Saeed, a California based Political Scientist and founder of the Pakistan American National Alliance.

Activist Raja Muhammad Yaqub, Chairman of the Coalition of Pakistani Organizations of Chicago, said Pakistan’s former Supreme Court chief justice Iftikhar Chaudhry must be reinstated.

“We struggle for independence of the judiciary in Pakistan and real democracy in Pakistan, and economic development and a modern state that can give human rights and civil rights and economic stability to Pakistan,” he said.

Muhammad Salim Akhtar of the American Muslim Task Force on Civil Rights and Elections said Obama administration’s support for the opposition would mean that the US favors full democracy in Pakistan.

“We hope and pray that Obama government understands the situation and they will demand before we (US) can deal with this government (Pakistan Government) who came through the democratic process but their norms are not democratic,” he said.

Meanwhile, a Pakistan Embassy spokesman defended Islamabad’s move to obstruct lawyer’s Long March, which could create some serious law and order implications.

“It’s the responsibility of the government to protect life and property of the citizens. The government would not allow a situation, which could result in the bloodshed of its own people on the roads. Hence, necessary measures are being taken to maintain peace and security in the country,” Nadeen Kiani said. (ANI)