Pak nuclear stockpile to touch 200 in a decade: Experts

WASHINGTON: Pakistan has the world’s fastest-growing nuclear stockpile and it could achieve 150-200 warheads in a decade despite the political instability in the country, two top American atomic experts have said.

Pakistan is in the process of building two new plutonium production reactors and a new reprocessing facility to fabricate more nuclear weapons fuel, wrote nuclear experts Hans M Kristensen and Robert S Norris in the latest issue of Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.

In their paper ‘Pakistan’s nuclear forces, 2011′, the authors estimate that if Pakistan’s expansion continues, its nuclear weapons stockpile could reach 150-200.

“Despite its political instability, Pakistan continues to steadily expand its nuclear capabilities and competencies; in fact, it has the world’s fastest-growing nuclear stockpile,” they wrote.

“We estimate that Pakistan has a nuclear weapons stockpile of 90-110 nuclear warheads, an increase from the estimated 70-90 warheads in 2009,” the paper said.

“It is also developing new delivery systems. Enhancements to Pakistan’s nuclear forces include a new nuclear capable medium-range ballistic missile, the development of two new nuclear-capable short-range ballistic missiles, and the development of two new nuclear-capable cruise missiles,” they wrote.

“With four new delivery systems and two plutonium production reactors under development, however, the rate of Pakistan’s stockpile growth may even increase over the next 10 years,” they warned.

Q&A: Why the attention on Pakistan’s Chashma nuclear complex?

(Reuters) – Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari visits China from Tuesday, following mounting signs that Chinese companies are moving ahead with plans to build two reactors at the Chashma nuclear complex in Punjab province.

Here is an explanation about those plans and why some other governments are concerned.

WHAT IS THE CHASHMA COMPLEX?

Chashma in Pakistan’s Punjab province is the site of a nuclear power complex built using Chinese expertise and designs. One 300 megawatt pressurized water reactor began commercial operation in 2000, and Chinese companies are building another one likely to be finished in 2011 or 2012.

Chinese nuclear companies have also unveiled plans to build another two bigger reactors at Chashma in coming years. They have not issued detailed information about when they will start, but contracts have been signed and financing is being secured.

WHY IS CHINA HELPING BUILD MORE REACTORS THERE?

Converging foreign policy and commercial motives appear to be driving China’s decision.

Pakistan is a long-standing partner of China, and Beijing believes it is important to back Pakistan to counter Indian regional dominance. It is also wary of growing U.S. sway across South Asia.

Pakistan faces increasing power shortages, and demand is likely to keep growing quickly as the country’s population expands.

There’s also a commercial pull, said Mark Hibbs of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Chinese nuclear companies want to win foreign markets, and for now Pakistan is virtually the only “springboard” they have to hone their skills abroad and nurture the expertise that they hope will later find customers in other parts of the world.

ARE THERE NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION RISKS?

In theory, Pakistan could at some later date take spent fuel from Chashma to reprocess for plutonium that could be used for nuclear weapons.

In practice, however, the International Atomic Energy Agency keeps safeguards at Chashma to prevent that happening, said Hibbs. China would keep control of the spent fuel to ensure it is not at risk of diversion to weapons programs, he said.

“There would be no connection between the fuel and reactors provided by China and Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program,” he said.

SO WHAT ARE OTHER GOVERNMENTS WORRIED ABOUT?

Some of the worry is about Pakistan, and some is about the integrity of nuclear non-proliferation rules. There are those, including many commentators in India, who say Pakistan is so dogged by instability and militant pressures that it should not receive nuclear technology, which could be the target of attacks.

Also, leading Pakistani nuclear scientist A.Q. Khan was an important illicit broker of nuclear technology to Iran, Libya and North Korea, and critics say that is another reason to worry.

The more broadly shared worry is that, however safe Chashma may be, expanding the nuclear complex there could be a fresh blow to the integrity of nuclear non-proliferation rules.

Pakistan and India have nuclear weapons, and both countries refuse to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which would oblige them to scrap those weapons.

The NPT rules say that if countries not authorized to possess nuclear weapons want to receive nuclear materials from countries adhering to the Treaty, they should accept comprehensive safeguard agreements for their nuclear activities.

WHAT CAN THEY DO?

For now, the main arena for addressing this issue is the Nuclear Suppliers Group, a 46-member body that seeks to ensure nuclear exports are not diverted to non-peaceful purposes.

To receive nuclear exports, nations that are not one of the five officially recognized atomic weapons states must usually place all their nuclear activities under the safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency, say NSG rules.

When the United States sealed its nuclear agreement with India in 2008, it won a waiver from that rule from the NSG after contentious negotiations. Washington and other governments have said China should at least seek a similar exemption for the planned reactors in Pakistan.

But there is little likelihood of all 46 member governments of the NSG voting in favor of a waiver, and this is a group that operates by consensus, said Hibbs.

(Reporting by Chris Buckley; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)

U.S. makes new nuke concessions to India

Washington, Apr.21 (ANI): India will receive new concessions as part of its bilateral civilian nuclear agreement with the United States.

In a move that has angered arms control advocates, Washington agreed to Indian demands to increase the number of plants allowed to reprocess U.S.-supplied nuclear fuel from one to two, with the option of another two if India”s needs grow in the future, the Washington Times reports.

India has thus far failed to pass legislation that would release U.S. companies from liability in case of accidents related to equipment they have provided for two reactors to be built under the 2007 U.S.-Indian Nuclear Cooperation Agreement.

That effectively prevents those firms from starting businesses in the South Asian country.

The U.S. government understands “the need for sufficient indigenous Indian capacity to reprocess or otherwise alter in form or content, under [International Atomic Energy Agency] safeguards, U.S.-obligated nuclear material,” says the new document, which was released by the State Department.

In 2008, the Bush administration restricted Indian reprocessing to one plant in an effort to limit potential proliferation of dangerous dual-use technology, which could be used for military or civilian purposes. However, last month”s agreement refers to “two new national reprocessing facilities established by the government of India.”

It also says “the management of separated safeguarded plutonium … shall take into account the need to avoid contributing to the risks of nuclear proliferation, the need to protect the environment, workers and the public.”

Arms control experts denounced the new deal, saying it adds to the “damage” done by the original agreement.

“It will further undermine U.S. efforts to stop the spread of enrichment and reprocessing technologies,” Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association, said of the March deal.

“It should be rejected by Congress because it is inconsistent with the terms outlined in” the original agreement, he added.

The new document does not need congressional approval and will go into force unless Congress stops it within 30 days. (ANI)

US report reveals Pak enhancing nuke weapon capability to target India

Washington, Sep.1 (ANI): Top US nuclear scientists have shockingly revealed in a report that Pakistan is enhancing its nuclear weapons and production capabilities.

According to the report, which is yet to enter the public domain, Pakistan is readying a new nuclear capable ballistic missile for deployment and two nuclear capable cruise missiles.

It also says that Pakistan is building two new plutonium production reactors and a second chemical separation facility at Chasma, Khushab and Dera Ghazi Khan in southern Punjab.

Pakistan is also renewing work on a partially built separation plant at Chasma.

It is believed that this secretive and substantial arsenal build-up is targeted at India.

Based on official estimates of Pakistan’s current uranium and plutonium technology, scientists had so far thought the country far short of having a 100 nuclear warheads in its kitty.

The new report, however, suggests that Pakistan has exceeded earlier estimates, and from being able to build 30-40 nuclear weapons it actually could possess as many as 70-90 – a disturbing figure from India’s point of view and that of the US, currently debating financial and military aid to its friend in keeping with the AFPAK agreement.

Moreover, if this report is true Pakistan is clearly going beyond the moratorium existing as an unwritten code of conduct in South Asia to halt the arms race. (ANI)

North Korea threatens to launch strikes against South Korea

Seoul (South Korea), May 27 (ANI): North Korea on Wednesday threatened to launch military strikes against South Korea if any of its ships were stopped or searched as part of an American-led operation to intercept vessels suspected of carrying weapons of mass destruction.

“We consider this a declaration of war against us,” an unidentified North Korean military spokesman said Wednesday in a statement carried by the North’s official news agency KCNA.

“Any hostile act against our peaceful vessels including search and seizure will be considered an unpardonable infringement on our sovereignty and we will immediately respond with a powerful military strike,” the statement said.

The strident rhetoric, although not unusual in North Korean statements released to the outside world, is likely to further sharpen tensions created by the North’s surprise nuclear test, which drew a condemnation that was swift, widespread and angry.

Earlier Wednesday, a South Korean newspaper reported that American spy satellites had detected plumes of steam and other signs of activity at a North Korean plant that reprocesses spent nuclear fuel to make weapons-grade plutonium.

The report from the newspaper, Chosun Ilbo, appeared to support a claim made by North Korea in late April that it had restarted its reprocessing plant at Yongbyon, 60 miles north of Pyongyang, the capital.

In its statement Wednesday, the North Korean military also questioned the “legal status” of five South Korea-held islands on the countries’ disputed western sea border. The military “will not guarantee the safe navigation” for American and South Korean vessels, both military and civilian, sailing in the waters near the border, the spokesman said. (ANI)

Kim Jong-il ‘anoints’ youngest son as successor

Seoul – North Korea’s communist leader Kim Jong-il has promoted his youngest son to a key post, in a possible sign of grooming him as a successor, South Korean media reports said Sunday. The secretive family dynasty has ruled the nuclear-armed north of the peninsula since 1948, with increasing speculation at the health of the 67-year old Kim Jong-il, who is believed to have suffered a stroke.

According to the South Korean news agency Yonhap, citing “informed” sources, the youngest of Kim’s known three sons, Kim Jong- un, has been appointed to a junior position on the National Defence Commission – the most powerful decision-making organ in the Stalinist country.

Kim Jong-un is believed to be either 25 or 26 years old. The elder two sons, Kim Jong-nam, 37, Kim Jong-chol, thought to be 27, have also been named as possible successors at various times.

However little reliable information leaks out from the reclusive regime in Pyongyang. Previous reports that Jong-un would be a candidate for election to the Supreme People’s Assembly in March this year proved to be incorrect.

The three sons publicly acknowledged come from two different mothers, neither of whom is married to Kim Jong-il, whilst the leader is also believed to have daughters.

Kim Jong-il “inherited” the post of North Korean leader from his father, Kim il-Sung, who died in 1994. However, Kim il-Sung was then commemorated as the regime’s “eternal president”. His successors are merely designated head of state by virtue of being party leader within the one-party state.

Earlier this month Kim Jong-il was re-elected chairman of the National Defence Commission at a meeting of the Supreme People’s Assembly in the capital, in a vote considered a mere formality.

The speculation comes at a particularly fraught time in relations between North Korea and the outside world. On April 5 the regime test-fired a rocket which it claimed was a satellite, but intelligence agencies believe was a long-range ballistic missile.

United Nations Security Council criticism of the launch prompted North Korea to walk out of six-party talks aimed at persuading it to renounce its nuclear programme.

On Saturday Pyongyang announced it was recommencing work on reprocessing spent nuclear fuel rods, capable of producing weapons- grade plutonium. (dpa)

North Korea starts reprocessing nuclear fuel

Seoul – North Korea said Saturday it has started again to reprocess spent nuclear fuel rods to produce weapons-grade plutonium. “The reprocessing of spent fuel rods from the pilot atomic power plant began as declared in the Foreign Ministry statement dated April 14,” the state-run Korean Central News Agency cited a Foreign Ministry spokesman, who referred to work at North Korea’s Yongbyon nuclear facility.

The measure was to contribute to “bolstering the nuclear deterrence for self-defence in every way to cope with the increasing military threats from the hostile forces,” the spokesman said.

North Korea last week quit international negotiations to end its nuclear weapons programme, following criticism by the United Nations Security Council of its April 5 rocket launch, which the council regarded a breach of a resolution banning the Stalinist state from testing long-range ballistic missiles.

Following the Security Council statement, Pyongyang announced its withdrawal from the six-party talks, and said it would restore nuclear facilities it has been disabling after a 2007 disarmament deal. (dpa)

IAEA says dialogue only way forward for North Korea

BEIJING (Reuters) – International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei on Monday called for new dialogue to solve the diplomatic stand-off with North Korea, adding that he hopes the six-party talks will resume and the IAEA will be allowed back into the country.

“There is no other solution apart from dialogue,” ElBaradei said at a conference on nuclear energy in Beijing. “The only way to resolve these issues is not through flexing muscles … but to try to engage the root causes.”

Monitors from the IAEA, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, left North Korea on Thursday after being ordered out by Pyongyang, which has raised regional tensions by saying it will abandon atomic disarmament talks and restart an aged nuclear complex it had agreed to shut in an aid-for-disarmament deal.

The U.N. Security Council unanimously condemned North Korea’s launch of a long-range rocket on April 5, saying the action contravened a U.N. ban.

North Korea has said it will revive all its facilities at its Soviet-era Yongbyon nuclear complex, including a reprocessing plant that makes plutonium which can be used for nuclear weapons.

Pyongyang began taking apart the Yongbyon plant more than a year ago as a part of a deal reached in so called six-party talks with China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States. IAEA inspectors were invited to monitor the moribund plant.

Israel ready to bomb Iran N-sites: Report

The Israeli military is preparing to launch a massive aerial strike on Iran’s nuclear installations in a “matter of days or even hours” of being given a go ahead by the government, a media report said on Saturday.

“Israel wants to know that if its forces were given the green light they could strike at Iran in a matter of days, even hours. They are making preparations on every level for this eventuality. The message to Iran is that the threat is not just words,” a senior Israeli defence official was quoted as saying by Times online.

Among the steps taken to ready Israeli forces for what would be a risky raid requiring pinpoint aerial strikes are the acquisition of three Airborne Warning and Control (AWAC) aircraft and regional missions to simulate the attack.

Officials believe that Israel could be required to hit more than a dozen targets, including moving convoys.

The sites include Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges produce enriched uranium; Esfahan, where 250 tonnes of gas is stored in tunnels; and Arak, where a heavy water reactor produces plutonium.

The distance from Israel to at least one of the sites is more than 870 miles, a distance that the Israeli force practised covering in a training exercise last year that involved F15 and F16 jets, helicopters and refuelling tankers.

Israeli military preparing to blow Iran’s nuclear sites

Jerusalem, Apr. 18 (ANI): The Israeli military is preparing to launch a massive aerial strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities within days of being given the go-ahead by its new government.

“Israel wants to know that if its forces were given the green light they could strike at Iran in a matter of days, even hours. They are making preparations on every level for this eventuality. The message to Iran is that the threat is not just words,” The Times quoted a senior defence official, as saying.

Among the steps taken to ready Israeli forces for what would be a risky raid requiring pinpoint aerial strikes are the acquisition of three Airborne Warning and Control (AWAC) aircraft and regional missions to simulate the attack.

Officials believe that Israel could be required to hit more than a dozen targets, including moving convoys.

The sites include Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges produce enriched uranium; Esfahan, where 250 tonnes of gas is stored in tunnels; and Arak, where a heavy water reactor produces plutonium.

In 1981, Israel had blown off Iraq’s Osirak nuclear facility near Baghdad. It had destroyed the facility within 100 seconds..

Another official added that it was unlikely that Israel would carry out the attack without receiving at least tacit approval from America, which is unlikely to give its consent.

“The American defense establishment is unsure that the operation will be successful. And the results of the operation would only delay Iran’s program by two to four years,” said Ephraim Kam, the deputy director of the Institute for National Security Studies.

On the other side, Israel believes that Iran will have the bomb within two years.

“Once they have a bomb it will be too late, and Israel will have no choice to strike – with or without America,” an Israeli Defence Ministry official said. (ANI)

U.N. inspectors leave North Korea: report

TOKYO (Reuters) – U.N. nuclear inspectors left Pyongyang on Thursday, Japan’s Kyodo news agency said, after being ordered out by North Korea, which has raised tensions by vowing to quit disarmament talks.

The U.N. Security Council unanimously condemned North Korea’s launch of a long-range rocket on April 5 as contravening a U.N. ban and demanded enforcement of existing sanctions against Pyongyang.

North Korea told the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Tuesday that it had decided to revive all its facilities at its Soviet-era Yongbyon nuclear complex, including the reprocessing plant that produces plutonium for nuclear weapons.

The United States has said the North has also asked American experts overseeing the Yongbyon shutdown under the deal to leave the country.

Analysts have said that the North could have the plant operating again in as little as three months.

(Reporting by Yoko Kubota; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)

South Korea sees no end to nuclear talks with North Korea

Seoul – South Korea’s government has not written off the six-nation talks aimed at ending North Korea’s nuclear weapons programme although Pyongyang withdrew from the negotiations, South Korea’s prime minister said Wednesday.

“We think that six-party talks are the only forum where the North Korean nuclear issue can be discussed and be solved,” Han Seong Soo said in an interview with the German Press Agency dpa in Seoul, a day after North Korea vowed never to participate in the talks again.

“I don’t think they’re dead,” Han said of the discussions that began in 2003 and involve the two Koreas, the United States, China, Japan and Russia.

The other participants must wait until North Korea returns to the negotiating table, the premier said.

Han said he regretted the totalitarian state’s decision Tuesday to stop its participation in the talks in reaction to the UN Security Council’s condemnation of a North Korean rocket launch this month.

“That is very, very unfortunate,” he said.

He added, however, that he believes negotiations could be continued because other countries are involved and ready to proceed.

On Tuesday, North Korea said it would not be bound by any agreements made at the six-party talks and would restore nuclear facilities that it had disabled as part of those negotiations.

North Korea’s Foreign Ministry also said it intended to restart a reactor at its Yongbyon nuclear facility, 100 kilometres north of Pyongyang, as well as reprocess nuclear fuel rods for plutonium, build its own light-water nuclear reactor and “bolster its nuclear deterrent for self-defence in every way.” Plutonium can be used for nuclear weapons.

The International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations’ global nuclear watchdog, stopped monitoring North Korea’s nuclear facilities Wednesday, a diplomat in Vienna said, one day after the country announced it would kick out the agency’s inspectors.

Pyongyang’s actions came in response to what it called a “brigandish,” “unjust” UN Security Council statement from Monday condemning an April 5 North Korean rocket launch.

The council statement called the launch a violation of UN resolutions and demanded North Korea conduct no further launches.

Pyongyang said the launch was a “peaceful” one of a communications satellite. Japan, South Korea and the United States said no satellite has been detected in orbit and they believe the launch served as cover for testing a long-range missile. (dpa)

North Korea kicks out IAEA nuclear inspectors – Update

Vienna – North Korea told the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Tuesday to stop monitoring its nuclear facilities as the country wants to restart its nuclear programme, IAEA spokesman Marc Vidricaire said. “The inspectors have also been asked to leave the DPRK at the earliest possible time,” Vidricaire said, referring to the country’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

IAEA inspectors are present in North Korea to monitor that the country’s nuclear installations remain dismantled and turned off, as mandated under the so-called six-party agreement between North and South Korea, the United States, Russia, China and Japan.

North Korea has informed the IAEA that it plans to reactivate all nuclear facilities, which include a reactor and a plant to reprocess spent nuclear fuel.

To that end, the Vienna-based agency should remove all cameras and seals from the Yongbyon nuclear site, the communist East Asian nation demanded.

The reprocessing plant was used in the past to make plutonium for the North Korean nuclear weapons programme.

The country said earlier Tuesday that it would boycott international negotiations on ending its nuclear weapons programme and restore nuclear facilities in reaction to the UN Security Council’s (UNSC’s) condemnation of a North Korean rocket launch.

Vidricaire told German Press Agency(dpa)

South Korea set to curtail North arms trade

SEOUL (Reuters) – South Korea is expected to announce as early as Wednesday plans to curtail the North’s suspected trade in weapons of mass destruction, further raising tensions with Pyongyang after the North vowed to quit nuclear disarmament talks.

North Korea said on Tuesday it would re-start a plant that makes bomb-grade plutonium in response to a U.N. rebuke over its launching of a long-range rocket 10 days ago.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said its inspectors have also been ordered to leave North Korea.

In a move bound to ratchet up tensions, South Korea is poised to reveal it will soon join U.S.-led interception of shipments suspected of carrying parts or equipment for weapons of mass destruction. Pyongyang has said such an action would be considered a declaration of war.

The plan, called the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) and joined by 94 countries, would let South Korea stop and board North Korean ships sailing in its territorial waters when suspected of carrying arms or other illicit materials.

North Korea’s threat on Tuesday to quit six-party disarmament talks poses the first big foreign policy test for the Obama administration.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton criticized the expulsion of the U.N. nuclear inspectors as an unnecessary provocation but said Washington was ready to talk.

“Obviously we hope that there will be an opportunity to discuss this not only with our partners and allies but also eventually with the North Koreans,” Clinton said in Washington.

North Korea’s expulsion of U.N. nuclear inspectors is a major reversal of steps it took in 2007 halting the operation of the Yongbyon nuclear complex and allowing the IAEA in to seal facilities there.

INSPECTORS EXPELLED

The U.N. Security Council on Monday condemned North’s launch of a long-range rocket, declaring it was a violation of a U.N. resolution adopted in 2006 after the North’s nuclear and missile tests and ordered the enforcement of existing sanctions.

Shipments of energy aid to the North has slowed since last year because of a dispute over how to verify the North’s nuclear inventory under the disarmament deal struck by the South and North Korea, the United States, Japan, Russia and China in 2005.

Experts said the North could have its plant that separates plutonium from spent fuel rods up and running again in as little as three months.

Announcements like this from North Korea are part of a familiar pattern of behavior and as such it is not likely to be a destabilizing factor for regional economies.

Japan’s conservative Yomiuri newspaper sounded a warning that the six-way nuclear disarmament talks may be about to fall apart and pressed China, the North’s key ally and main benefactor, to do more.

“As the North’s largest trading partner and biggest supporter, we hope China will take every effective measure it can against Pyongyang, including a strict application of sanctions on the nation,” the daily said in an editorial.

China has called for calm and restraint from all sides in the six-party talks while expressing hope that the negotiations it hosts would resume.

New U.N. measures may cause Beijing to curb trade in a few items but some analysts said it is likely to maintain its flow of energy, grains and other materials that prop up the North’s broken-down economy.

(Editing by Nick Macfie and Jeremy Laurence)

Iran inaugurates new nuclear fuel facility

ran’s president has inaugurated a new facility producing uranium fuel for a planned heavy-water nuclear reactor. The West fears the reactor could eventually be used for producing a nuclear weapon.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has announced the plant’s opening during a ceremony in the central city of Isfahan. The plant will produce pellets of uranium oxide to fuel the heavy-water research reactor, which is scheduled to be completed in 2009 or 2010.

Iran denies any intention to build a nuclear weapon. The US and its allies have expressed concerns Iran could reprocess spent fuel from the heavy-water reactor into plutonium for building a warhead.

The process is distinct from uranium enrichment, which produces fuel for a light-water reactor. Highly enriched uranium can be used to build a warhead as well. Iran’s enrichment program presents more immediate concerns to the West than the hard-water reactor, because it is far more advanced.

The announcement comes a day after the United States announced it would participate directly in group talks with Iran over its nuclear program, another significant shift from President George W Bush’s policy toward a nation he labeled part of an axis of evil.

“Denaturing” plutonium in nuclear bombs makes them unsuitable for warfare

Washington, March 12 (ANI): Washington, March 5 (ANI): In a move which would be taken positively by advocates of world peace, a team of engineers has developed a technique to “denature” plutonium created in large nuclear reactors, making it unsuitable for use in nuclear arms.

Developed by engineers at the Ben-Gurion University (BGU) of the Negev in Israel, the technique involves adding Americium (Am 241) in plutonium so it can only be used for peaceful purposes.

Americium is a form of the basic synthetic element found in commercial smoke detectors and industrial gauges.

The technique could help “de-claw” more than a dozen countries developing nuclear reactors if the United States, Russia, Germany, France and Japan agree to add the denaturing additive into all plutonium.

“When you purchase a nuclear reactor from one of the five countries, it also provides the nuclear fuel for the reactor,” explained Professor Yigal Ronen, of BGU’s Department of Nuclear Engineering, who headed the project.

“Thus, if the five agree to insert the additive into fuel for countries now developing nuclear power – such as Bahrain, Egypt, Kuwait, Libya, Malaysia, Namibia, Qatar, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Yemen – they will have to use it for peaceful purposes rather than warfare,” he added.

Ronen originally worked on Neptonium 237 for the purpose denaturing plutonium, but switched to Americium, which is meant for pressurized water reactors (PWRs), such as the one being built in Iran.

“Countries that purchase nuclear reactors usually give the spent fuel back to the producer,” explained Ronen.

“They wouldn’t be able to get new plutonium for weapons if it is denatured, but countries that make nuclear fuel could decide not to denature it for themselves,” he added. (ANI)

New technique may herald end of nuclear arms

Washington, March 5 (ANI): In a move which would be taken positively by advocates of world peace, a team of engineers has developed a technique to “denature” plutonium created in large nuclear reactors, making it unsuitable for use in nuclear arms.

Developed by engineers at the Ben-Gurion University (BGU) of the Negev in Israel, the technique involves adding Americium (Am 241) in plutonium so it can only be used for peaceful purposes.

Americium is a form of the basic synthetic element found in commercial smoke detectors and industrial gauges.

The technique could help “de-claw” more than a dozen countries developing nuclear reactors if the United States, Russia, Germany, France and Japan agree to add the denaturing additive into all plutonium.

“When you purchase a nuclear reactor from one of the five countries, it also provides the nuclear fuel for the reactor,” explained Professor Yigal Ronen, of BGU’s Department of Nuclear Engineering, who headed the project.

“Thus, if the five agree to insert the additive into fuel for countries now developing nuclear power – such as Bahrain, Egypt, Kuwait, Libya, Malaysia, Namibia, Qatar, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Yemen – they will have to use it for peaceful purposes rather than warfare,” he added.

Ronen originally worked on Neptonium 237 for the purpose denaturing plutonium, but switched to Americium, which is meant for pressurized water reactors (PWRs), such as the one being built in Iran.

“Countries that purchase nuclear reactors usually give the spent fuel back to the producer,” explained Ronen.

“They wouldn’t be able to get new plutonium for weapons if it is denatured, but countries that make nuclear fuel could decide not to denature it for themselves,” he added. (ANI)

US nuclear relic dating back to 1944 found in bottle

London, March 3 (ANI): Scientists have found a discarded bottle at a waste site in the US that contains the oldest sample of bomb-grade plutonium made in a nuclear reactor, dating back to 1944.

According to a report by BBC News, the sample dates to 1944 and is a relic from the infancy of the US nuclear weapons programme.

A team from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory used nuclear forensic techniques to date the sample and track down its origins.

The type of plutonium in the bottle – known as Pu-239 – is a so-called alpha emitter. These alpha particles are too bulky to penetrate skin or paper, but they can cause poisoning if swallowed or inhaled.

It has a half-life (the time it takes for half the radioactive nuclei in a sample to decay) of 24,110 years.

The bottle in question was discovered in a burial trench at the Hanford nuclear site in Washington state, north-western US.

Established as part of the Manhattan Project in 1943, Hanford was home to the world’s first full-scale plutonium production facility.

The Manhattan Project was the US’ bid to build the world’s first nuclear weapon during World War II. The project’s roots lay in fears that Nazi Germany was investigating similar technology.

The Hanford site is now the focus of a massive environmental cleanup effort due to high levels of radioactive waste that remain at the site.

While excavating a burial trench in December 2004, clean-up personnel discovered a safe which contained a jug filled with whitish liquid slurry.

Further tests revealed the bottle contained a type of plutonium made by re-processing spent fuel in a manner consistent with early operations at Hanford.

Realising the historic potential of the find, Jon Schwantes and colleagues from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory carried out further tests on the sample.

In order to determine its age, the researchers analysed the different forms, or isotopes, of plutonium and uranium in the sample.

They found it had been separated from the spent fuel in 1944.

In order to determine which reactor had produced the sample, they compared plutonium isotope ratios from the contents of the bottle against technical data from nuclear research reactors that were operating at the time the sample was made.

Their results strongly suggested the plutonium was manufactured at the prototype X-10 reactor at Oak Ridge in Tennessee, which began operating in 1943, a year after the Manhattan Project was authorised. (ANI)

Israel says Iran’s activation of nuke plant, an international failure

Jerusalem, Feb.26 (ANI): Iran’s decision to activate the Bushehr nuclear reactor highlights the international community’s failure to stop that country from obtaining a nuclear weapon, the Jerusalem Post quoted senior Israeli defense officials, as saying on Wednesday.

“If they were not stopped until now, it is very possible that Iran will succeed in becoming a nuclear country,” one senior defense official told The Jerusalem Post.

“Israel, though, is not the only country that needs to be concerned. Iran is also a threat to Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and other countries in the Gulf,” the official added.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak said Wednesday that the test run at Bushehr and Iran’s claims that it had increased the number of centrifuges enriching uranium to 6,000 constituted an existential threat to Israel.

“Israel’s policy is clear: We are not ruling out any option regarding the Iranian nuclear [program] and we recommend that others don’t rule out any option either,” Barak said in an address at the Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, in a hint to US President Barack Obama’s administration.

“A dialogue with Iran should be defined and limited in time.”

“Time is running out. Clear and decisive sanctions against the Iranian regime, alongside readiness to consider necessary actions in case the sanctions don’t work, are necessary,” Barak said.

He added that Russia has had a crucial role in pressuring Iran, and that sanctions without Russia’s participation would be meaningless.

The power plant in the southern port city of Bushehr, built with Russian help, is meant to be the first in a number of reactors for an energy program.

It’s unclear when the reactor could be switched on.

It was not known how long after the tests the reactor could start up.

The plant, which will run on enriched uranium imported from Russia, has worried the West because the spent fuel could be turned into plutonium, a potential material for nuclear warheads.

US concerns over the reactor softened after Iran agreed to return spent fuel to Russia to ensure Teheran does not reprocess it into plutonium.

Iran says it intends to use the enriched uranium fuel in its first domestically-built nuclear power plant in Darkhovin, which it wants to start operating in 2016. (ANI)