PM refuses to front insulation inquiry

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says he will not appear before a Senate inquiry into the scrapped home insulation program.

A Senate committee is trying to establish what went wrong with the $2.45 billion scheme which was axed after it was linked to the deaths of installers, house fires and allegations of rorting.

The committee has asked Mr Rudd, the minister formerly responsible for the scheme Peter Garrett, the new minister responsible Greg Combet, and Employment Participation Minister Mark Arbib to appear. They have all refused.

Mr Rudd’s office says Question Time is the appropriate place for ministers to answer questions on the issue.

“That is the place to question ministers, not stunts like the Opposition’s party-political inquiry,” a spokesman for Mr Rudd said.

Liberal Senator Mary Jo Fisher, who chairs the environment references committee, says the response “gets a laugh out loud from the committee chairwoman”.

“The Australian people would find that response … offensive,” Senator Fisher said.

“It is dismissive of the fraud, the fires, the accidents, the fatalities that have happened.”

Senator Fisher says the Coalition-dominated committee has not been able to get satisfactory answers from bureaucrats so they wanted to go straight to the top.

The committee would consider its options after Mr Rudd and the ministers refused to appear, she said.

Opposition environment spokesman Greg Hunt says the Prime Minister should appear before the Senate inquiry.

“This is not like any other government failure of the last 30 years, there has been a huge human impact,” Mr Hunt said.

“The Prime Minister should appear to explain what the Government knew and why they made the decisions and why they ignored the warnings.”

Federal police asked to probe coal ship oil spill

Australian Federal Police (AFP) have been called in to investigate how a bulk coal ship ran aground on the Great Barrier Reef off central Queensland.

Salvage crews are today expected to start pumping fuel oil off the Shen Neng 1, which ploughed at full speed into Douglas Shoal, east of Rockhampton, last Saturday.

The Chinese-registered ship ruptured a fuel tank and damaged the engine room when it ran aground.

Several tonnes of fuel oil leaked into the ocean but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

About 975 tonnes of oil remain on the stranded ship.

Two response boats are at the site and have inflated booms around the coal carrier to minimise any further spillage.

Around 250 people are on standby in case oil reaches the coast but that is now considered unlikely.

The AFP has been asked to consider mounting a criminal investigation into how the ship ran aground but has not yet confirmed whether it will investigate.

Maritime authorities are already looking into the incident.

Salvage begins

Authorities will today start pumping the remaining oil supply off the ship ahead of attempts to refloat the vessel.

Maritime Safety Queensland (MSQ) spokesman Patrick Quirk says recovery ships are in place to prepare for the pumping operation.

“The bunker barge Larcom and our salvage response vessels managing the boom are in position,” he said.

“The processes are taking place to get the oil moving but as yet they are not pumping any oil.

“It is an involved process to connect the pumps and the hoses and our check lists satisfied.

“We’ll start the process when we’re happy that it’s safe to do so.”

Premier Anna Bligh will also fly over the stricken ship today.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett, Greens Leader Bob Brown and Queensland Transport Minister Rachel Nolan have already flown over Douglas Shoal this week.

It is still not clear when authorities will try to move the ship off the reef.

RSPCA spokesman Michael Beatty says it is looking for volunteers to head to central Queensland should there be a major oil spill.

Mr Beatty says it is only a contingency plan.

“Particularly wildlife carers or people who have experience with wildlife is to go on to our website and register on there – obviously with contact numbers, details of experience and availability – and then we can mobilise those people basically instantly to go up and assist if needed,” he said.

Meanwhile, a maritime law expert doubts the Queensland Government will recover the full cost of salvaging the ship.

The State Government says the ship’s owners will be forced to pay for the full clean-up and salvage costs.

But maritime expert Professor Nick Gaskell has told AM that there is a cap on the amount they will have to pay and there is likely to be a gap between the actual cost and what the owners will have to pay.

“There is a maximum amount calculated according to the size of the ship, and my calculations on the information available to me indicate that the maximum sum for this ship will be in the region of $23.5 million,” he said.

“In exchange for having a no-fault liability, the ship owners are entitled to have a ceiling, a maximum amount of damages for which they’re liable.”

Kirby slams government inaction on same-sex marriage

A former High Court justice would swap 10 judges for one honest homosexual like singer Ricky Martin, a conference in Brisbane has been told.

Michael Kirby, former Justice of the High Court of Australia, opened and closed his keynote address at the second International Queer Studies Conference on Thursday by playing Martin’s song Livin’ La Vida Loca.

Justice Kirby, who revealed he was gay while serving on the High Court, praised the singer for coming out about his homosexuality.

“At the beginning of this month Ricky Martin said, I quote: ‘The secret has become too heavy for me to keep inside, so joyfully I embrace my homosexual identity as something worth celebrating’,” Justice Kirby said.

“He’s not a philosopher but what he said was very powerful and spoke of an oppression that was forced on him and forced on many people in society and I would trade 10 judges of the highest court for one person like Ricky Martin.”

While he had praise for the Latino pop star, Justice Kirby had criticism for the Federal Government over its inaction in introducing laws which acknowledge same-sex marriages.

“The present Federal Government have not thought it timely to attack the issue [of legalising gay marriages]. It has of course been debated in party conferences,” he said.

“It has also been agitated in the trade union movement but so far it hasn’t secured anybody in the Federal Parliament, in the Labor Party to champion the cause.

“Peter Garrett (federal Environment Minister) was reported as having at one stage supported gay marriages and there would be people from both sides of Federal Parliament who would support it.

“But at the moment they are hiding their heads and they are not doing much about it.”

He said the Opposition was no better, quoting Leader Tony Abbott as saying: “From a conservative point of view it would be a good thing to encourage stable relationships”.

Justice Kirby said strong religious beliefs promoting only the union of a man and a woman was holding the country back from granting gay people the right to marry, but he believes reform will come.

“Labor Party circles always include in Australia a component of people from the Irish Australian background and therefore often from a Roman Catholic upbringing … a cohort in the Labor Party which generally supports confining marriage to people of the opposite sex,” Justice Kirby said.

“That’s where we stood at the time of the 2007 election.

“My partner and I have discussed the issue and probably would not get married if there were such a law because we have stuck it out for 41 long years and the idea of getting married we haven’t fully embraced.”

But he said he understood why other homosexual partners wanted the right to marry because it represented equality of citizenship.

The conference, being held at the Queensland University of Technology, finishes on Saturday.

Unclear how much damage to reef: Garrett

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett says it is still unclear how much damage a Chinese coal carrier has caused to the Great Barrier Reef off central Queensland.

The Shen Neng 1 ran aground on Douglas Shoal, east of Rockhampton, on Saturday, spilling more than two tonnes of fuel oil into the ocean but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

Two ships have arrived at the site to help pump out the remaining 950 tonnes of oil onto a bunker barge.

They are also carrying inflatable booms to contain any spill.

Mr Garrett says the operation will help reduce the risk of further damage to the reef.

“A vessel of this size is going to have some impact – the extent of that impact we won’t know until the vessel is successfully removed,” he said.

Authorities expect to start pumping oil from the ship by Friday morning.

Inquiry call

Federal Opposition environment spokesman Greg Hunt says there should be an inquiry into ships taking shortcuts through the Great Barrier Reef.

Mr Hunt says he is also pushing for tougher fines.

“We want this practice stopped,” he said.

“We want the fines for taking shortcuts deliberately out of the shipping channels, through the Barrier Reef, quadrupled.”

Garrett inspects oil spill ship

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett has flown over the bulk coal ship stranded on the Great Barrier Reef off central Queensland this morning.

Three ships are expected to arrive later today to help transfer the remaining 950 tonnes of oil aboard the Shen Neng 1, which hit Douglas Shoal at full speed east of Rockhampton on Saturday.

The Chinese-registered ship ruptured a fuel tank when it ran aground, spilling more than two tonnes of oil into the ocean, but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Greens Leader Bob Brown and Queensland Transport Minister Rachel Nolan have already flown over Douglas Shoal this week.

Final preparations are being made to transfer oil from the stranded ship.

Maritime Safety Queensland spokesman Patrick Quirk says a number of ships are involved in the recovery operation.

“The bunker barge Larcom left Gladstone in the early hours of this morning,” he said.

“The Pacific Responder is on station. She’s the emergency response vessel.

“We also have some tugs chartered by MSQ carrying oil pollution booms. They’re on site as well in preparation for oil transfer operations tonight or tomorrow.”

Mr Quirk says crews have spent the past few days ensuring the ship is stable.

“We spent a number of days with the salvors and the surveyors on board assessing the vessel’s condition,” he said.

“The first major step of this operation will be to remove the oil from that vessel as far as we possibly can.

“We’ll be aiming to remove as much free oil as we can bearing in mind it will always be on this vessel because of the nature of its damage, some oil and water mixture in some of its tanks.”

Shipping law

The incident has prompted debate over shipping channels, pilotage and monitoring systems.

Queensland Resources Council (QRC) chief executive Michael Roche expects the industry will be consulted if changes are made to shipping in the Great Barrier Reef.

“If the government is contemplating such changes, I’m sure they’ll come knocking and we’re very open to discussing sensible changes,” he said.

“It’s in no-one’s interest to place in jeopardy such a great asset as the Great Barrier Reef.”

Mr Roche says the oil is a bigger environmental concern than the coal on board.

“I think the real fear from these sort of events are from the liquid fuels that power the ships rather than the cargo they’re carrying,” he said.

“I think people with other agendas, anti-coal agendas, are focusing on the fact that this particular ship’s cargo is coal.”

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) chairman Russell Reichelt says some changes would involve going to an international body.

“Should Australia take moves to change the shipping channels and kinds of reporting the ships are needed to do, it will involve consultation with the International Maritime Organisation, and my colleagues at the maritime safety authority are well represented there,” he said.

“They would be the group to take forward any review of where the ships are going in that region.”

A shipping expert says Australia should push for higher standards among cargo ship crews.

Peter Morris, a former federal Labor transport minister, headed an inquiry into shipping safety in the 1990s. He says the competence of crews is in decline internationally.

“Australia has access and is well regarded at the International Maritime Organisation, the agency that covers this area,” he said.

“Matters can be raised there the same as if there was compulsory pilotage for the inner route, which is what the ship was on.”

Tourism body applauds oil spill ship management

The head of the Queensland Tourism Industry Council (QTIC) says he is “greatly encouraged” by the way authorities are handling salvaging the bulk coal ship stranded on the Great Barrier Reef off Rockhampton.

Three ships are expected to arrive today to help transfer the remaining 950 tonnes of oil abroad the Shen Neng 1, which hit Douglas Shoal at full speed, east of Rockhampton, on Saturday.

The Chinese-registered ship ruptured a fuel tank when it ran aground, spilling more than two tonnes of oil into the ocean, but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett will fly over the stranded ship later this morning to check the situation.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Greens Leader Bob Brown and Queensland Transport Minister Rachel Nolan have already flown over Douglas Shoal this week.

Authorities say they are well prepared for any oil leakage when they remove fuel oil from the grounded ship.

Booms will be used to contain any spills.

The incident has prompted debate over shipping channels, pilotage, and the system of monitoring ships.

QTIC spokesman Daniel Gschwind says local, state and federal authorities have done a good job of limiting the damage and keeping people informed.

“We hope that the way this has been managed and the way the damage has been contained is limiting any impact on the tourism industry,” he said.

“I certainly believe that visitor flows will continue.”

Dive tourism fears

But the Association of Marine Park Tourism Operators (AMPTO) says the incident could affect the Great Barrier Reef’s reputation as a dive destination.

AMPTO executive director Col McKenzie says the incident has not interrupted dive trips but it is affecting people’s perceptions.

“People are ringing Cairns operators and have the perception that the grounding and the oil spill is going to affect the industry off Cairns,” he said.

“That’s because people find it very hard to come up with the idea that the Barrier Reef is 2,500 kilometres long.

“But there is a perception that this could damage the reef and we have to be very proactive in making sure people understand just what magnificent natural resource we have off our coast.”

Mr McKenzie says companies should have to pay to transport freight through the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.

He says other industries that use the reef have to contribute to its management.

Mr McKenzie says insurance does not necessarily cover the whole cost of disasters.

“These ships run up and down in there all the time and they contribute absolutely nothing in regard to voyage planning,” he said.

“It saves them a lot of time and therefore money to come inside the Great Barrier Reef, which is why they do it, and yet they contribute nothing as a user of the marine park.”

PM’s Department ‘kept insulation warning secret’

The Federal Opposition says there is now a smoking gun showing the Prime Minister’s Department was warned the home insulation program could cause electrocutions.

The Australian Financial Review has obtained the minutes of a meeting in February last year when the Prime Minister’s Department was warned of the danger.

Mr Rudd says the former minister responsible for the insulation scheme, Peter Garrett, already referred to the meeting in question.

“The meeting that you refer to certainly was referenced in Minister Garrett’s statement to Parliament on February 11 this year,” he said.

But Coalition environment spokesman Greg Hunt says Mr Rudd has been extensively questioned on the issue and never revealed the details of the meeting.

“The revelation that the Prime Minister’s Department, at the highest levels, had warnings as early as February last year of electrocution under the home insulation program is a bombshell,” he said.

“These warnings have been kept secret by the Prime Minister and his department.”

Mr Hunt says Mr Rudd must call a judicial inquiry this week.

“The Prime Minister has kept material from the Parliament, under questioning his senior officials have apparently been gagged,” Mr Hunt said.

“What we want now is a full judicial inquiry into the home insulation program without delay and we want the Prime Minister to make the full information available and to appear before the inquiry.”

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett says the Government did take into account early warnings it received of electrocutions under the home insulation program.

Mr Garrett says he has been open about the warnings the Government received and how it responded.

“The advice that came through at that meeting and many others was taken account of in the development of a risk framework for rolling out that program, and that’s been clearly enunciated by me and my statements to Parliament and subsequently,” he said.

Garrett pledges caution over new resort plan

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett says he will carefully consider new plans being drawn up by Tower Holdings up for a resort on Great Keppel Island off central Queensland.

Mr Garrett rejected previous plans because of environmental concerns and says the new plan must ensure the World Heritage area is protected.

“We want to make sure that we look at these projects very thoroughly [and] they’re considered carefully under the national environment legislation,” he said.

“Until such time as a proposal is in front of me I won’t say anything other than we will always diligently seek to make sure that the environment standards that we apply to projects right around Australia are those that the public would expect.”

Mr Garrett says any plans must ensure the natural area is protected.

“That’s something which I will take advice on from the department,” he said.

“I’ll listen carefully to any issues that are brought forward by the proponents [and] if I need to get extra scientific advice then I’ll make sure that I’ve got that in front of me.

“And of course we take careful note of community views but at the end of the day, I make the decision on my own, very mindful of the responsibilities I have under the national environment laws.”

Garrett to inspect oil spill ship site

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett will check the status of the bulk coal ship stranded on the Great Barrier Reef off central Queensland with a flight over the area this morning.

Three ships are expected to arrive today to help transfer the remaining 950 tonnes of oil aboard the Shen Neng 1, which hit Douglas Shoal at full speed east of Rockhampton on Saturday.

The Chinese-registered ship ruptured a fuel tank when it ran aground, spilling more than two tonnes of oil into the ocean, but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Greens Leader Bob Brown and Queensland Transport Minister Rachel Nolan have already flown over Douglas Shoal this week.

Authorities say they are well prepared for any leakage when they remove fuel oil from the stricken ship. Booms will be used to contain any spills.

The incident has prompted debate over shipping channels, pilotage and monitoring systems.

The Queensland Government says it has also made preparations on land in case of a spill which could not be contained.

Queensland Transport spokesman Dave Stewart says the risk of fuel leaking from the ship during the process is very low.

“I can say the preparedness – if oil does leave the ship and does move to the beach – is high,” he said.

However, it is expected to be weeks before the ship can be towed off the reef.

‘Ticking time bomb’

The director of the Australian Marine Conservation Society, Darren Kindleysides, says the risk of pollution to the reef will be reduced once the oil is removed.

“As long as the oil stays on the coal carrier it’s like a ticking time-bomb,” he said.

“In terms of reducing the risk to the reef, getting the oil off that vessel as quickly as possible is certainly the way to go.”

However, Mr Kindleysides says that will not be the end of it.

“You’ve still got a ship there grounded, you’re still damaging the habitats in the area and of course you’ve still got all the coal on board,” he said.

But Queensland Resources Council chief executive Michael Roche says the oil is a bigger environmental concern than the coal on board.

“I think the real fear from these sort of events are from the liquid fuels that power the ships rather than the cargo they’re carrying,” he said.

“I think people with other agendas, anti-coal agendas, are focusing on the fact that this particular ship’s cargo is coal.

“The threat to the reef is not the coal, it’s from the oil that all ships carry.”

Reef damage

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) chairman Russell Reichelt says it is likely the coal carrier has caused significant damage to coral.

Mr Reichelt says the ship is essentially excavating the reef and divers will investigate once it is safe.

“The kinds of things our divers will look for will be the anti-fouling paints and anything that might be toxic that’s scraped off the vessel and sitting on the seabed and that’s not uncommon in ship groundings,” he said.

“So we expect there to be some clean-up operations needed after the ship’s removed.”

Funds to boost Kokoda Track safety

The Australian Government is providing another $3 million to improve safety along the Kokoda Track in Papua New Guinea.

Environment Minister Peter Garrett says the money will be spent on several projects including improved navigation for flights in and out of Kokoda.

It will also provide for upgrades of roads and the Kokoda airstrip, as well as first aid training.

Earlier this month the Government spent $250,000 to improve the road that leads to the Kokoda Track.

Work on the safety upgrades began after 13 people, including nine Australians, were killed in a plane crash near Kokoda last August.

Four other Australians died while walking the 96-kilometre mountain track last year.

Garrett promises marine green zones consultation

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett says the process of creating new marine conservation areas is being carefully managed.

Mr Garrett says all parties with an interest in the Coral Sea and Gulf of Carpentaria conservation zones in Queensland will be consulted.

He says compensation for reduced fishing access will be considered as part of the planning process for new conservation areas.

“We’ve got a targeted consultation underway with a special liaison officer based in Brisbane, who can meet with fishers and others to talk through these issues,” he said.

“That’s why we are going through an extensive process of hearing from stakeholders thoroughly on their views about areas for further assessment.”

Mr Garrett says the commercial fishing sector is represented on the Government advisory group.

“We have had comments from the industry acknowledging that the Government will conduct a thorough consultation process,” he said.

“They’ve raised issues of concern, of course, and that’s their legitimate right to do so, but they have done it in the context of acknowledging the thorough and careful way we are working through this process.”

S-E waters in proposed federal marine park

Sections of the New South Wales Far South Coast are tipped to become part of a federally protected marine park.

The Federal Environment Protection Minister, Peter Garrett, says the government is considering declaring a 2.4 million sq km stretch of ocean from Cape York to Bermagui a marine park.

It includes a large expanse of deep water ocean extending almost 200km out to sea from Batemans Bay and Narooma.

The Australian Conservation Foundation’s Chee Chee Leung says the declaration would recognise the unique characteristics of the Far South Coast.

“The people of the Batemans area should be really proud that their area has been acknowleged in these areas for further assessment.

“It recognises that there are special and unique features about this region.

“This includes things like the continental shelf and slopes, and the water there has different depths which creates lots of biological diversity.”

For more, go to the South East News blog at http://bit.ly/dgL1SN

No blanket ban on fishing in Coral Sea: Garrett

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett says there will not be a “blanket ban” on fishing in the Coral Sea off north Queensland.

Last year, the Government declared a conservation zone in almost one million square kilometres of the region while it decides whether to make it a “no-take” area.

Now Mr Garrett says the Government will also examine Commonwealth waters from the Torres Strait to southern New South Wales, and east to Norfolk Island.

“The Government is not intending to have one large no-take area across the whole of the Coral Sea conservation zone,” he said.

“We believe that we want to meet the really important goals of protecting the conservation and environment of the Coral Sea, whilst at the same time allowing for mixed uses.”

Garrett urged to save Botanics bats

Animal rights groups want Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett to block an application that would allow a colony of threatened fruit bats to be driven out of Sydney’s Royal Botanic Gardens.

The Botanic Gardens Trust wants to use noise harassment techniques to evict thousands of the grey-headed flying foxes, which it says are damaging valuable heritage trees and plants.

Humane Society International’s Nicola Beynon says when similar techniques were used in Melbourne in 2003, the bats just ended up roosting in nearby areas.

“There’s no clear proposal to relocate these flying foxes to another colony and they will just be dispersed to take up residence wherever else they feel like,” she said.

“In the other camps around the Sydney area already there are problems with residents not being supportive of them. So this is just moving the problem around.”

Ms Beynon says bats in Melbourne were also traumatised by the noise.

She said it could lead many females in the colony to have miscarriages.

Feedback sought on cane toad plan

North-west Western Australian residents have been invited to make submissions on a Commonwealth review of cane toad management.

The Federal Government is putting together an action plan to minimise the impact of the introduced species whose poison is toxic to many native species.

In announcing the public consultation period, Environment Minister Peter Garrett said the ability of native animals to adapt to the toad after a period of exposure offered some hope.

He says the plan would focus on identifying ways to protect high priority native species and engage local communities in the process.

Privacy, fraud and insulation: the debacle continues

Mary from Bribie Island is a polite lady, so when she got a letter addressed to Daphne Weatherby, she didn’t consider opening it. She wrote “return to sender” on the official-looking envelope and planned to drop it back to the post office.

Out driving, she tuned into her radio – and heard another man tell me he had received a letter from the Federal Government asking whether he was happy with the installation of his insulation.

Having never had it installed he was confused, and Mary heard his confusion turn to anger when he told how he was dismissed as not knowing what was in his roof when he alerted the relevant authorities.

Mary went home and looked at the envelope again, opened it, and found out her house had also been used by some unscrupulous installation company to claim $1,600 for a job that was never conducted.

She told her neighbour. She had a letter too – another fraud case. And then on the Gold Coast, another one popped up. And so it goes.

Mary is more concerned about her privacy than fraud; she worries that someone has used her address. Others are worried that the Federal Government’s hotline has taken privacy in the other direction – refusing to reveal the name of the company alleging they did work on their homes.

Those cases are just the tip of an iceberg that could up-end attempts by the new assistant energy minister, Greg Combet, to sink the debacle that has demoted Peter Garrett and raised questions about the Government’s ability to deliver on programs.

Combet’s approach has been to get out and sell his plan to either rip the foil out, or install safety switches, in 50,000 homes, and to check a further 150,000.

He wants to be seen on the front foot, and talkback – always a good barometer of public opinion – shows listeners largely believe his vow to get to the bottom of the mess, and not cover it up further.

But with 42,500 of the 50,000 homes in Queensland, the litany of revelations that followed his vow shows the depth of the problem Combet, and his Government, still face.

Just take these examples revealed by talkback callers.

Master Electricians has recorded 20 cases of installers offering to sell lists of names to Queensland electricians, so they could then cold call, offering safety checks.

The Queensland Workplace Rights Ombudsman has initiated seven investigations over serious non-payment of wages by installation companies, that mushroomed overnight, and disappeared quickly afterwards. In one case, a father revealed how his son had worked for six months, and not received a cent.

Reputable installers have been thrown in with the bad; some are owed more than $100,000 from the Government, which isn’t providing any indication when they’ll be paid. Some have no choice, but to sack workers.

Some who have already had someone crawl into their roof, or done it themselves, have been shocked. In some cases, there’s hardly any insulation, in other cases it’s ripped, in other cases, it hasn’t been put where it should.

Others paid hundreds of dollars on top of the $1,600 rebate, because of the size of their roof. Remember, this is under a federal government-funded and encouraged scheme. Now they are having it ripped out – and being left hundreds of dollars out of pocket.

At least two people have had insulation installed, but when they called the hotline, there is no record anywhere of installers having been at their home. As one of them explained, if there’s no record of any insulation being put in, how can he now have it checked?

One listener has been told the Government will pay up to $400 for an electrician to check their home, plus the reimbursement of a safety switch. Another has been told the $400 must include the safety switch. And confusion remains over whether the Government will fund the installation of a second round of insulation, once the foil has been ripped out.

In at least two cases, ceilings have started to crack after a visit from insulation staff. Wayne noticed warps soon after installers crawled around his roof. He tried to contact the company but couldn’t. Last Friday, a big crack appeared. On Monday, the ceiling collapsed. The only people, he says, who had been in his roof are the installers and the company is not interested in his concerns.

Combet, acutely aware that four installers have lost their lives and more than 100 fires are being blamed on the government plan, has shown he’s happy to be exposed to the full extent of the problem, and to work towards fixing it.

But is it possible to gauge the level of fraud when people are unaware they have been targeted? How many homes have so far been used in fictitious claims?

How long will it take electricians to check 42,500 homes in one state and how do residents decide whether to rip out the foil, or install safety switches?

How do people find out whether their insulation has been installed correctly?

When are reputable companies, now shedding staff, going to receive owed monies?

How is the Government going to track down those companies, now disbanded, which employed staff, but didn’t pay them?

Where did thousands of people stand who signed a contract, to have the insulation installed, but required a signature isolating the Government from any legal liability?

What is going to happen to the stockpile of insulation products sitting in factories in Queensland? Electricity safety officers already hold concerns they will be sold at discounted prices, outside the federal scheme.

Combet says details of how the mangled program will be fixed are still being nutted out. But Queenslanders, who have been doubly affected because the end of the federal scheme meant the end of a parallel state scheme offering solar hot water rebates, are fed up.

This was a program that showcased the Government’s commitment to the environment, while helping working families to improve their lot.

On any objective assessment, it’s failed. And Kevin Rudd’s home state wants it fixed, before they’re ordered off to the polls later this year.

Madonna King presents Mornings each weekday from 8.30am on 612 ABC Brisbane.

Australia won’t back tuna trade ban

Despite a collapse of world tuna stocks, the Australian Government has decided not to support a global ban on the trade of the northern variety of the species.

Instead the Federal Environment Minister, Peter Garrett, is supporting stronger trade control measures on the trade of Atlantic bluefin tuna.

Australia will formalise its position at the 175-nation Convention of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) which starts in Doha tomorrow.

Stocks of Atlantic bluefin tuna are estimated to be at 15 per cent of the original 1940s levels after decades of industrial-scale fishing.

Mr Garrett says he believes imposing a blanket prohibition on international trade would undermine international fisheries management and cooperation to protect the species.

He says it will also allow individual countries to continue to catch Atlantic bluefin tuna for domestic consumption.

Greenpeace and the wildlife trade monitoring group Traffic say the stocks of Atlantic bluefin tuna are so low the species should not be fished at all.

Garrett urged to save west Sydney bushland

Conservationists say Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett needs to stop endangered bush from being cleared in western Sydney.

The old Australian Defence ammunition factory site near Penrith contains 360 hectares of Cumberland Plain bushland, but environmentalists say some of it is already being cleared to make way for a development.

Western Sydney Conservation Alliance spokesman Geoff Brown says the development was approved years ago, but Mr Garrett can stop it if he has the bush listed as Critical Habitat.

“The last line of defence for this Cumberland Plain woodland at the old ADI site is Peter Garrett – his department has just listed it as endangered, he needs to act,” he said.

“This is just appalling … any matter of national significance needs to go to Peter Garrett and there’s 360 hectares of national significance in Penrith in western Sydney which is … being swept under the carpet.”

Insulation fault suspected in latest house fire

Fire investigators will sift through the ruins of a family home in western Sydney this morning, amid suspicions faulty insulation could have set it on fire.

Fireman John Roach says the home at Woodpark has suffered very bad structural damage and may have to be demolished after its roof collapsed during the blaze.

The fire could be the 106th linked to the Government’s home insulation program.

While the scheme was axed last month, the Government is still facing serious questions about who knew what and when, in regards to safety warnings.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said the co-ordinator general advised the cabinet on the implementation of the program “from time to time”.

“I’m advised that in the co-ordinator general’s reports over that period of time no safety concerns were raised,” he said last month.

The Federal Opposition believes this assurance was a “gotcha” moment.

It says Mr Rudd must give a full explanation to Parliament next week, detailing all the warnings he was given about the program.

It says Mr Rudd was given a safety warning by the former minister Peter Garrett, and it points to the Prime Minister’s admission in Parliament yesterday that he received a letter on August 14.

Mr Rudd says he received a number of letters after that date too and he was asked to release them.

“These obviously are associated with the cabinet process and we are appropriately protected,” he said.

This means the public may never know what was in the letters.

Opposition environment spokesman Greg Hunt says the Australian people deserve a full statement from the Prime Minister on the floor of the Parliament next week.

“It’s very clear that – on the evidence before the Parliament and on the word around Canberra – that the Prime Minister’s department was not only told and warned about safety risks but also watered down the safety recommendations of the environment department,” he said.

“We have reason to believe that the Government did get warnings and recommendations for better safety standards than were adopted in the program and that it was the Prime Minister’s department through the project control group that watered those safety recommendations. And the Prime Minister denied that he had any safety knowledge on the 23rd of last month.

“Now, in Parliament just this week, only yesterday, he confessed that had had warnings from Peter Garrett on the 14th of August. But he won’t say what was in them.”

Mr Hunt says the Opposition has deep reservations about the Government plunging in and repeating the same mistakes again.

Australia’s Great Barrier Reef faces diseased future

Sydney, Sept 2 (ANI): A new report has painted a grim future for Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, warning of declines in significant species and outbreaks of disease.

According to a report carried out in www.news.com.au, the report is titled “The Great Barrier Reef Outlook report”, which is the first and most comprehensive of its kind.

It was released as Queensland Premier Anna Bligh and federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett signed a new reef plan to improve the water quality for the natural wonder.

The report identifies climate change, continued declining water quality from catchment run-off, loss of coastal habitats from development and remaining impacts from fishing and illegal fishing as the key issues undermining the resilience of the reef.

It said that damage to mangroves, increasing algae on coral reefs, ocean acidification and coral bleaching were already evident.

“While populations of almost all marine species are intact and there are no records of extinctions, some ecologically important species, such as dugongs, marine turtles, seabirds, black teatfish and some sharks, have declined significantly,” it said.

“Disease in corals and pest outbreaks of crown-of-thorns starfish and cyanobacteria appear to be becoming more frequent and more serious,” it added.

It follows a report a year ago, which found agricultural run-off was killing the Great Barrier Reef and that some sections were already irreversibly damaged, prompting a government promise to toughen regulations for farmers.

Bligh said that the reef was in danger of being “loved to death”.

“Two million people visited the coast between Bundaberg and Cairns each year, spending more than 5 million dollars and underpinning 50,000 jobs in the tourism industry alone,” she said.

Fisheries contribute a further 290 million dollars annually to the economy.

“We simply cannot afford to stand back and do nothing when we know it is at such risk,” Bligh said.

According to WWF spokesman Nick Heath, “We are seeing the reef on the brink of a catastrophe and we are going to have to see far faster action, far deeper cuts in our climate emissions from both our federal and state governments than we’ve seen to date.”

“This is a trigger for more action, not words,” he said.

Heath said that parts of the reef were already dying and would be catastrophically damaged within five years if significant action was not taken in the next 12 months.

He explained that land clearing and coal-fired power stations had to be banned, solar energy embraced, shark fishing reduced and carbon emissions strongly tackled. (ANI)