Afghans ready for more responsibility: U.N. envoy

(Reuters) – Afghanistan should be given more responsibility for its own security and administration with progress checked against six-month benchmarks, the United Nations’ top diplomat to the country said.

With around 150,000 NATO-led troops faced off against a Taliban insurgency at its strongest since their overthrow in 2001, Western governments are keen to pull out but fear the Afghans are not yet ready to take more charge.

“It is a chicken and egg situation, but the chicken is saying ‘we are ready to produce an egg’,” Staffan de Mistura, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s special representative for Afghanistan, told Reuters in an interview.

Over 60 foreign ministers — including U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — gather in the Afghan capital on Tuesday for a conference at which President Hamid Karzai will plead for more control of $13 billion in Afghan aid and development.

The country has received over $40 billion since 2002, but Karzai says the government has handled only around 20 percent of that and much of the graft and waste complained about in the West was lost through direct channels.

“They have a point,” de Mistura said, arguing that if the government institutions were seen to be driving development, ordinary Afghans would support it.

He drew parallels with Iraq, where he served as the U.N. special envoy at the height of violence there.

“The moment they started taking their own future in their hands, we saw an improvement — not perfect by any means, but an improvement.”

NOT READY FOR PEACE

Security remains the biggest factor.

“We all know, everybody knows, everybody recognizes, that there is no military solution to the conflict.”

“However there is, unfortunately, still a perception that the time for dialogue is not ready. The Taliban don’t seem to be indicating yet that they are ready for that dialogue.”

Although Washington did not want to see the Taliban leadership included in peace talks, it would be up to Afghans to decide “who was allowed inside the tent,” he said.

The government has offered amnesty and reintegration to low-level Taliban fighters who agree to abide by the constitution, renounce violence, and quit militant groups.

Asked if this should be expanded to Taliban leaders, he said: “… if anybody on the Afghan side would accept those three conditions, it would be difficult for the community … to say you aren’t allowed inside the tent.

The conference will hear Karzai and his ministers present blueprint of projects and timetables de Mistura believes could deliver results within a year.

Asked what differences he expected in six months, he said:

“First we will see the Afghans taking much more seriously the fact that responsibility has been given to them and therefore they need to make some major effort on the issue of accountability, corruption and delivering concrete assistance to their own people.

“Second, I hope we will be seeing progress on security, and therefore the ideal time for political dialogue, but between now and six months on the security side it will probably look worse before it looks better.

“What we need before the six months is over is … a vision by the Afghan government which will be articulated in a way that will engage and reassure every stakeholder — both internally and outside, and regional stakeholders as well — of what Afghanistan can and should be looking like in two years time,” he said.

(Editing by Jonathan Thatcher)

INTERVIEW-Afghans ready for more responsibility – U.N. envoy

KABUL, July 18 (Reuters) – Afghanistan should be given more responsibility for its own security and administration with progress checked against six-month benchmarks, the United Nations’ top diplomat to the country said.

With around 150,000 NATO-led troops faced off against a Taliban insurgency at its strongest since their overthrow in 2001, Western governments are keen to pull out but fear the Afghans are not yet ready to take more charge.

“It is a chicken and egg situation, but the chicken is saying ‘we are ready to produce an egg’,” Staffan de Mistura, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s special representative for Afghanistan, told Reuters in an interview.

Over 60 foreign ministers — including U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — gather in the Afghan capital on Tuesday for a conference at which President Hamid Karzai will plead for more control of $13 billion in Afghan aid and development.

The country has received over $40 billion since 2002, but Karzai says the government has handled only around 20 percent of that and much of the graft and waste complained about in the West was lost through direct channels. <^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

For Kabul Conference stories, see [ID:nKABCON]

For more on Afghanistan click [ID:nAFPAK]

or see link.reuters.com/syx62d

Afghan blog: blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

“They have a point,” de Mistura said, arguing that if the government institutions were seen to be driving development, ordinary Afghans would support it.

He drew parallels with Iraq, where he served as the U.N. special envoy at the height of violence there.

“The moment they started taking their own future in their hands, we saw an improvement — not perfect by any means, but an improvement.”

NOT READY FOR PEACE

Security remains the biggest factor.

“We all know, everybody knows, everybody recognises, that there is no military solution to the conflict.”

“However there is, unfortunately, still a perception that the time for dialogue is not ready. The Taliban don’t seem to be indicating yet that they are readly for that dialogue.”

Although Washington did not want to see the Taliban leadership included in peace talks, it would be up to Afghans to decide “who was allowed inside the tent”, he said.

The government has offered amnesty and reintegration to low-level Taliban fighters who agree to abide by the constitution, renounce violence, and quit militant groups.

Asked if this should be expanded to Taliban leaders, he said: “… if anybody on the Afghan side would accept those three conditions, it would be difficult for the community … to say you aren’t allowed inside the tent.

The conference will hear Karzai and his ministers present blueprint of projects and timetables de Mistura believes could deliver results within a year.

Asked what differences he expected in six months, he said:

“First we will see the Afghans taking much more seriously the fact that responsibilty has been given to them and therefore they need to make some major effort on the issue of accountability, corruption and delivering concrete assistance to their own people.

“Second, I hope we will be seeing progress on security, and therefore the ideal time for political dialogue, but between now and six months on the security side it will probably look worse before it looks better.

“What we need before the six months is over is … a vision by the Afghan government which will be articulated in a way that will engage and reassure every stakeholder — both internally and outside, and regional stakeholders as well — of what Afghanistan can and should be looking like in two years time,” he said. (Editing by Jonathan Thatcher)

Sudan asks Libya to expel Darfur rebel leader

KHARTOUM, June 27 (Reuters) – Sudan on Sunday said it had asked Libya to expel the leader of Darfur’s rebel Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), accusing him of trying to undermine peace talks and threatening attacks on Khartoum.

JEM leader Khalil Ibrahim has been staying in Libya since May when authorities in neighbouring Chad stopped him at their capital’s airport and said he could not pass through their territory to return to the battlefield in Darfur.

Ibrahim has since given a number of media interviews from Libya, repeating his movement’s threats to attack Sudanese cities, including Khartoum, and deriding ongoing peace talks between Sudan’s government and other rebel groups.

“We are asking Libya to expel him,” said Sudan foreign ministry spokesman Moawia Osman. “We don’t want him to make aggressive statements out of a sisterly country like Libya.”

Osman said Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi had spoken to Sudanese president Omar Hassan al-Bashir by phone and promised to limit Ibrahim’s communications and movements.

An expulsion could leave the JEM leader in a difficult position — Chad, which borders Sudan and Libya, has already refused to take him and an Egyptian refuge would anger Khartoum.

The Sudanese Media Centre, a news website with links to Sudan’s government, late on Saturday quoted the head of Sudan’s national security service Muhammad Atta al-Mawla Abbas saying Libya was preparing to expel Ibrahim.

Osman said he could not comment on the report.

JEM was one of two Darfur rebel groups that revolted in 2003 demanding more autonomy for the arid western region.

Sudan’s government responded with a brutal counter-insurgency campaign that Washington and some activists call genocide. Khartoum dismisses the accusation.

JEM spokesman Ahmed Hussein Adam said the report of an imminent expulsion was “rubbish and nonsense”.

“Dr Khalil is in Libya. They are treating him with great respect and dignity,” he said. Adam also dismissed reports Libya was limiting Ibrahim’s communications but said the JEM leader was not available for an interview.

JEM and Sudan’s army clashed last week in the Uzban area in eastern Darfur, both sides reported, both claiming victory. Violence has spiked since JEM suspended participation in troubled peace talks in the Qatari capital Doha in early May. (Reporting by Andrew Heavens; editing by Peter Graff)

BA not neglecting strike peace talks: CEO Walsh

(Reuters) – British Airways Chief Executive Willie Walsh said Monday he was “absolutely determined” in its dispute with cabin crew and dismissed union suggestions that he had neglected the crisis to travel abroad.

“What we are doing is absolutely right. We are looking to secure the long-term viability of BA,” Walsh told Reuters on the sidelines of the annual meeting of global airlines group IATA in Berlin.

“I am here on business … We have people available to meet and are ready to talk.”

British Airways cabin crew started their latest five-day strike Saturday in a long-running dispute which has so far cost the airline more than 120 million pounds ($173 million).

The strikes stem from BA’s decision last November to cut cabin crew pay and alter staffing levels on its flights.

Shares in BA, which have fallen 11 percent in the last three months, were 1.4 percent down at 197.9 pence by 1045 GMT, valuing the company at around 2.3 billion pounds.

Walsh and Unite, which represents BA’s cabin staff, blame each other for a breakdown in communication.

Derek Simpson, joint general secretary of Unite, said on his Twitter page that Walsh’s absence meant no meetings were possible, with Walsh out of the country until Tuesday.

“I have made it clear that I am available anytime day or night to meet with BA and Willie Walsh to attempt to resolve this dispute,” Simpson said in a statement.

Meanwhile, one of Unite’s joint leaders, Tony Woodley, was criticized in the British press Monday for flying off on holiday to Cyprus late last week as union members continue to strike.

The issue of travel allowances for cabin crew has become a serious sticking point in the conflict, which comes at a difficult time for BA.

“We have made it absolutely clear that if BA re-instates our members’ travel concessions we would suspend the strike action,” said Simpson.

A BA spokesman said conciliation service ACAS was trying to arrange discussions between the two parties but that no peace talks were planned.

Talks over the past six months have failed to yield a resolution, with the walkouts having caused BA to ground flights on 19 occasions so far.

The latest strike took place less than a week before the start of the soccer World Cup in South Africa and followed a five-day stoppage which ended Thursday. There was a four-day walkout last week and seven days of stoppages in March.

A BA spokesman said conciliation service ACAS was trying to arrange discussions between the two parties but that no peace talks were planned.

(Additional reporting by Kylie Maclellan; Editing by James Regan and Jon Loades-Carter)

($1=.6929 Pound)

Govt. awaiting a response from ULFA for talks: Pillai

Shillong (Meghalaya), June 4 (ANI): Union Home Secretary G K Pillai on Friday said the Central Government is awaiting a response from the banned United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) outfit after which the dialogue process might evolve.

“I understand that the Governing Council of the ULFA was held inside jail a few days back. They are discussing. We are awaiting a response, and as the response comes, the dialogue process will evolve,” said Pillai.

The members of the banned ULFA outfit appealed to the government to free its jailed leaders, so as to take a final decision on the proposed peace talks.

Welcoming the Assam Government”s decision on holding peace talks, the outfit”s Publicity Secretary Mithinga Daimary, said in a statement that his organisation never favoured a negotiation without its leader Paresh Baruah.

The development came after Union Home Minister P Chidambaram authorized Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi to initiate the dialogue.

Gogoi has reiterated that his government is ready to hold a dialogue with the ULFA leaders on all issues within the ambit of the Indian Constitution.

“The process has been initiated by the Government of Assam. Let them (ULFA) say. The process cannot be rushed,” Pillai said.

“A majority of members of the ULFA”s Governing Council are there. A couple of them are not there .We will welcome them for the talks,” he added.

Pillai further said the people of Assam want a dialogue to resolve the issue.

“If leaders outside indulging in violence listen to the voice of Assam, they will come forward for talks,” he said.

“Leaders outside will realize the futility of violence which is causing suffering to the people of Assam. If they are for the people of Assam, which they pretend to be, they will come forward for talks, if not today, then tomorrow,” Pillai added.

Earlier on May 28, ULFA Publicity Secretary Mithinga Daimary and Vice Chairman Pradip Gogoi, who were recently released on bail, had met Chairman Arabinda Rajkhowa at the Guwahati Central Jail.

The meeting reportedly discussed the Government”s peace talk offer. (ANI)

Q&A: Obama grapples with series of crises

(Reuters) – The diplomatic crisis over Israel’s raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla added to the pressures facing President Barack Obama, who is already grappling with a catastrophic oil spill and high unemployment at home.

U.S. | Green Business | Hot Stocks | Gulf Oil Spill

Here are some questions and answers about the challenges confronting Obama 16 months into his administration.

WHAT IS OBAMA’S MOST PRESSING PROBLEM?

Obama has said his highest priority is containing the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, rated the biggest in U.S. history.

Several efforts to plug the BP oil leak have failed. The Gulf region’s ecology and large seafood industry are at risk.

Obama, who has visited the Gulf Coast twice, is fighting accusations he reacted too slowly. He has sought to assert leadership on the calamity, telling the beleaguered Gulf Coast residents “the buck stops with me.”

HOW DOES THE GAZA RAID COMPLICATE OBAMA’S MIDEAST AGENDA?

The White House has reacted cautiously to the storming of a Turkish aid ship bound for Gaza, which has left nine dead and sparked an international outcry.

Close U.S. ally Israel has found itself increasingly isolated and the incident dealt a fresh setback to the latest effort to restart Israel-Palestinian peace talks.

Adding to the difficulties are recent strains in U.S.-Israeli relations.

Obama, who made Mideast diplomacy a major priority, had succeeded in reviving Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations through U.S.-mediated indirect talks. But there has been little or no progress and prospects look even more bleak after the flotilla incident.

The incident might also complicate Obama’s effort to secure new United Nations Security Council sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program.

HOW BIG A CONCERN IS THE U.S. ECONOMY?

The U.S. economy has shown signs of improvement in recent months in the aftermath of the 2008-2009 financial crisis.

But Americans are still struggling and the U.S. unemployment rate is 9.9 percent, near a 27-year high, posing political problems for Obama and his Democratic allies ahead of the November congressional elections.

An upcoming government report on the jobs market is expected to show a surge in hiring for the U.S. Census but private economists expect only a small drop in the unemployment rate to 9.8 percent.

Meanwhile, the administration is concerned about the potential fallout for the United States of the European debt crisis, which could dampen world growth and depress U.S. exports. In a worst-case scenario, it could result in a broader financial contagion.

HOW DOES THE U.S. DEFICIT COMPLICATE THE PICTURE?

The debt woes of countries like Greece, Spain and Portugal have put a spotlight on the U.S. budget deficit, which is projected to hit $1.6 trillion this year.

Republicans have attacked Obama over the red ink, labeling him a big spender. The White House counters that the deficits are a legacy of fiscal mismanagement under the Bush administration.

Some Democratic lawmakers have become more reticent about backing additional social safety-net spending amid indications U.S. voters are increasingly concerned about the deficit.

White House officials are debating how far to go in emphasizing a message of budgetary restraint when the lackluster pace of economic growth remains a pressing concern.

WHAT ABOUT OTHER ISSUES ON OBAMA’S DOMESTIC AGENDA?

Obama’s signed a landmark overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system into law in March, notching up a win on his top domestic priority.

But it is unclear how much the healthcare victory will help Democrats among voters in November. Republicans continue to attack the measure as an attempted government takeover of a key sector of the economy.

Obama’s plan to overhaul U.S. financial regulation looks likely to pass in the coming weeks, perhaps by July 4. A House-Senate panel is hammering out a final bill after separate measures have passed both houses of Congress.

WHAT ABOUT THE STANDOFF BETWEEN THE TWO KOREAS?

Mounting antagonism between North and South Korea threatens to complicate U.S. diplomatic efforts toward Pyongyang’s patron, China, which has responded cautiously to Seoul’s charge that the North torpedoed one of its warships. Washington is looking for ways to head off any possibility of a military confrontation.

WHERE DO THINGS STAND WITH THE WARS?

AFGHANISTAN – Obama ordered 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan in December in an effort to break the momentum of the Taliban. After making little progress, U.S. forces are preparing for a major offensive in the Taliban’s spiritual heartland, Kandahar. Obama vows the United States will not abandon Afghanistan, but he is sticking to a promise to begin withdrawing troops from July 2011.

IRAQ – Obama has declared the Iraq war will end for the United States by the end of 2011, when remaining U.S. troops will withdraw. Three months after a March 7 parliamentary election, Iraq still does not have a government, raising fears that the long delay could exacerbate sectarian tensions. But Washington says it is sticking to its withdrawal timetable.

(Compiled by Caren Bohan and Ross Colvin; editing by Cynthia Osterman)

FACTBOX-Key political risks to watch in Colombia

May 31 (Reuters) – The likely election victory of former defense minister Juan Manuel Santos as president, rebel and drug violence, the push for investment grade rating, and tensions with Venezuela are all points to watch in Colombia this year.

JUNE ELECTION RUN-OFF

Juan Manuel Santos looks set to win a June 20 run-off election and succeed his former boss Alvaro Uribe as president. He won the most votes in a May 30 first round, easily beating former mayor Antanas Mockus after polls had shown them in a tie. While he fell just short of an outright win, Santos is clearly favored to win the June run-off [ID:nN31230268]. Investors see that as a signal Uribe’s security and pro-business policies will continue, and Santos also has a strong position in Congress to push through reforms. Colombia’s peso COP=RR and TES bonds TFIT15240720 rose marginally after the result. Santos won in all but one of Colombia’s states and garnered more than double the votes of Mockus. He will likely count on the support of former Uribe allies in the Cambio Radical and Conservative parties to further bolster his backing. Mockus may flirt with the leftist Democratic Pole party, but risks alienating moderate voters. But Santos must also try to distance himself from the scandals over rights abuses and corruption that blemished Uribe’s government. A probe into whether state agents illegally wiretapped Uribe’s opponents, reporters and judges has crept closer to the presidency without involving Uribe. Support for Mockus surged before the vote, thanks to his call for clean government and ethics. For full election coverage, click on [ID:nCOLOMBIA].

What to watch:

– Alliance-building before June run-off.

– Scandals in the Uribe administration hurting Santos.

ARMED GROUPS, DRUG TRAFFICKERS

Uribe gained the upper hand in Colombia’s long conflict with successes against the left-wing Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia or FARC rebels. But peace talks are unlikely. Under intense pressure from Uribe’s security policies, the FARC has settled into hit-and-run tactics. Both Santos and Mockus are promising a tough line but Santos, as former defense minister, appears better equipped to ensure continuity, adapt policy where needed and also manage relations with Washington as the White House steadily reduces military aid. Authorities can still score with major rebel desertions or by capturing or killing top leaders while the FARC could seek to gain more credibility by releasing some hostages or show its force by pulling off operations such as its kidnapping of a governor in December [ID:nN2272297] and an attack that killed nine marines before the election [ID:nN24194130]. Colombia remains the world’s No. 1 cocaine producer and illegal armed groups are all engaged in drug trafficking, making the government’s task more complex as rebels form alliances with drug-trafficking gangs. Despite a demobilization of paramilitaries who once fought the FARC, new groups have emerged and rights groups say they are an increasing threat. U.S. Democrats who have final say over approving U.S. aid and a free trade deal for Colombia will watch the new government for signs of improved control of rights abuses and drug corruption among troops and lawmakers, as well as more protection for union leaders and rights workers and probes into their murders.

What to watch:

– Major blows to the FARC’s leadership.

– Urban rebel attacks to show resurgence.

VENEZUELA TENSIONS

Tensions between Uribe and Venezuela’s socialist President Hugo Chavez have been at their worst as the two clash over a plan to allow U.S. troops more access to Colombia’s military bases to help combat drug trafficking. Chavez says the plan is a U.S. threat to his OPEC nation. Trade ties always served as a buffer zone between Chavez and Uribe, but Venezuela has curbed commerce and that is hurting Colombia’s economic recovery, knocking around 1 percentage point off its GDP growth. Some analysts say they cannot rule out a limited border incident — even by accident. Santos says he could work with Chavez, but a Santos presidency would likely keep tensions high as Chavez calls the candidate a threat and Santos says he would stop Chavez spreading his socialist revolution to Colombia. Chavez has said he hoped for dialogue with the new Colombian leader. But he will likely still lash out at the base plan and use it to attack U.S. influence. [ID:nN28225132]

What to watch:

– Increased nationalist saber-rattling.

– A Colombian deal to sell electricity to energy-strapped Venezuela that is improving ties.

NEW, OIL MINING INVESTMENTS

Thanks to its political stability, better security and pro-business environment, Colombia is now Latin America’s No. 4 oil producer, a major coal exporter and a growing player in gold investment. Canadian companies like Pacific Rubiales (PRE.TO) and other foreign operators are making headway in exploring Colombia’s once-abandoned oil fields. Risks from guerrilla attacks on oil operations remain and the country needs more infrastructure [ID:nN23202379]. But it hopes production will reach more than 1 million barrels per day next year and an oil block auction in June will measure interest. Mining is also growing, with particular interest in gold. Some companies have faced resistance in receiving environmental permits, including AngloGold Ashanti (ANGJ.J). But Canada’s Greystar Resources (GSL.TO) recently won an appeal over an environmental permit.

What to watch:

– Results of June auction of 200 oil and gas blocks.

– Environmental authorities rulings on mining.

INVESTMENT GRADE

Santos, a former finance minister who once helped bring Colombia out of a fiscal crisis, says creating jobs and generating economic growth are key parts of his platform. He will increase the taxpayer base to bolster state revenue to help fight the budget deficit — one of the key reasons Colombia does not have investment grade rating. Mockus too is known for his fiscal discipline when he was mayor, and is asking for higher taxes. Last year, Canada-based credit rating agency DBRS raised Colombia to investment grade, citing debt management, macroeconomic policy and public security gains. That pushed up the peso and local stocks. But larger rating agencies have so far balked at giving Colombia the prized rating. Colombia says the country needs a fiscal overhaul, based on Norway’s model, before it can reach the grade. The government now says it will leave the sale of the state’s share in energy supplier Isagen to the next president, leaving a question mark over budget financing and opening the way for more foreign debt issuance. The announcement of the delay in the sale hit TES debt and the peso. [ID:nN18146934]

What to watch:

– More debt sales, local or international.

– How the next government handles Isagen. (Editing by Eric Walsh)

Factbox: Raid at sea adds to Israel’s diplomatic troubles

(Reuters) – A lethal raid by Israeli security forces on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla caused an international outcry on Monday and confronted the Jewish state with yet another diplomatic storm.

World

Early reaction to the raid, in which at least 10 activists were killed, included French condemnation, a call for an inquiry by the European Union and expressions of shock from the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights. Turkey, one of Israel’s few Muslim allies, recalled its ambassador.

The incident poses a fresh challenge to Israeli diplomats who have scrambled over the past year to contain the fallout from other incidents, from evidence that Israel forged the passports of friendly states to accusations that it committed war crimes during a war in the Gaza Strip.

Here are some of the other diplomatic storms faced by Israel over the last year.

DUBAI ASSASSINATION

Britain and Australia have expelled Israeli diplomats after concluding that Israel forged British and Australian passports used by the assassins of a Hamas leader.

Israel has neither confirmed or denied a role in the killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, a Hamas military commander who was assassinated in a Dubai hotel room in January.

Britain said such misuse of British passports was “intolerable.” Australia said it was not the behavior of “a nation with whom we have had such a close, friendly and supportive relationship.”

SETTLEMENT ROW WITH UNITED STATES Israeli plans for new Jewish settlement on occupied land in East Jerusalem triggered unusually harsh criticism from the United States in March when it damaged Washington’s efforts to revive the Middle East peace process.

The announcement, made during a visit to Israel by U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, temporarily set back U.S. efforts to bring about indirect peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, who want East Jerusalem as the capital of a future state. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the project was an insult. Israeli Prime Minister Benajamin Netanyahu said he was blindsided by planning bureaucrats and apologized to Biden.

THE GOLDSTONE REPORT

Israel has sought to rebuff the conclusions of a U.N. inquiry that found it guilty of committing war crimes during a 2008-2009 offensive in the Gaza Strip.

South African jurist Richard Goldstone’s report found both Israel and the Hamas movement that controls Gaza guilty of war crimes, but focused more on Israel. Israel refused to cooperate with Goldstone and described his report as distorted and biased.

More than 1,400 Palestinians were killed in the three-week conflict, which Israel launched with the declared aim of halting rocket fire from Gaza into Israel. Thirteen Israelis were killed.

NUCLEAR PROGRAMME

Israel, widely assumed to have the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal, has faced renewed calls to sign a global treaty barring the spread of atomic weapons.

Signatories of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) last week called for a conference in 2012 to discuss banning weapons of mass destruction throughout the Middle East.

Last week’s declaration was adopted by all 189 parties to the NPT, including the United States. It urged Israel to sign the NPT and put its nuclear facilities under U.N. safeguards.

(Writing by Tom Perry, editing by Paul Taylor)

Snap Analysis: Clash at sea is Hamas lifeline

(Reuters) – Israel’s storming of an aid flotilla bound for the blockaded Gaza Strip on Monday is likely to increase pressure on the Jewish state to ease its siege, throwing a lifeline to Islamist Hamas which controls the territory.

World

The violence of the naval interdiction deepened doubt about the future of indirect, U.S.-sponsored peace talks with the Palestinians that began three weeks ago.

With at least 10 activists killed, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could face a backlash of unprecedented proportions: the “Free Gaza” convoy included volunteers from regional powerbroker Turkey and other foreigners.

There could also be trouble closer to home, where a restive Israeli Arab minority awaited word of the fate of one of its clerics, Sheikh Raed Salah, who was reported among casualties.

For Israel, storming the ships after they ignored warnings to turn back was part of a strategy of isolating Hamas in its Gaza fiefdom in the hope of tilting Palestinian sympathies toward Western-backed President Mahmoud Abbas.

But Abbas’s credibility has been undermined by Israeli settlement of the occupied West Bank, another territory where Palestinians want statehood, and he can ill afford to stand by as outsiders bleed on behalf of Gaza’s 1.5 million Palestinians.

Similarly challenged will be U.S. President Barack Obama, who plans to host Netanyahu in the White House on Tuesday. Those talks have been cast as a chance to mend testy bilateral ties but Obama, whose administration had urged Israel to ease the Gaza embargo, will be hard put to avoid comment on the flotilla.

Oussama Safa of the Lebanese Center for Policy Studies predicted Obama might “ante up the pressure against the Israelis” to accommodate Abbas, who branded the deaths a “massacre” and called for three days of Palestinian mourning.

HEROES, FOR HAMAS

Hamas, which has largely fallen from world headlines since its war with Israel some 18 months ago, welcomed what it described as a win-win situation from the standoff at sea.

Hamas government head Ismail Haniyeh said of the activists: “You were heroes, whether you reached (Gaza) or not.”

Another delay in peace negotiations that have been stop-start for almost two decades would hold little real drama. Abbas, with his truncated West Bank mandate, is too beholden to Israel and the United States to close the door on rapprochement.

But the possibility of a fissure with Turkey — long Israel’s most important Muslim ally but whose pro-Islamist premier, Tayyip Erdogan, has chafed at the alliance — could deepen Israel’s own isolation even as it tries to persuade wavering Arab countries that Iran is the main regional threat.

Monday’s bloodshed overshadowed a fence-mending visit by Israeli cabinet minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer to Qatar, among Gulf states that had frozen ties with Israel over its crackdowns against a Palestinian uprising that erupted a decade ago.

As then, hard questions will be asked about the wisdom of using the military — in this case, battle-hardened naval commandos — for what was essentially a policing operation. Israeli officials insisted their troops acted in self-defense.

“I see all the looks that I’m getting. The images (of the naval takeover) are certainly not pleasant,” Ben-Eliezer told Israel’s Army Radio by telephone.

Nahman Shai, a former Israeli military spokesman turned opposition lawmaker, likened the confrontation to the police killing of a dozen Arab citizens who demonstrated and rioted in solidarity with the Palestinians in late 2000.

“The difference is that this time foreigners are involved, which means a much wider impact,” Shai told Israel Radio.

(Additional reporting by Mohammed Assadi in Ramallah, Nidal al-Mughrabi in Gaza and Yara Bayoumy in Beirut; Editing by Samia Nakhoul)

Fresh round of talks with NSCN-IM Tuesday in Nagaland

Dimapur (Nagaland), May 31 (IANS) Government negotiators begin fresh talks Tuesday in Nagaland with the Isak-Muivah faction of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN-IM), the state’s dominant separatist group, aimed at ending nearly six decades of insurgency.

New Delhi’s main peace interlocutor R.S. Pandey will meet NSCN-IM leaders in Kohima. This is the first time talks are being held in Nagaland since a ceasefire in August 1997 between the two sides.

‘The talks are expected to discuss wide-ranging issues although we cannot divulge the agenda,’ Pandey told IANS.

The NSCN-IM would be led by general secretary Thuingaleng Muivah, while officials from the central home ministry and intelligence agencies are expected to participate in the negotiations.

New Delhi and NSCN-IM have held more than 55 rounds of peace talks in the past 13 years to end one of South Asia’s longest running insurgencies that has killed 25,000 people since 1947.

The NSCN-IM is, however, cynical of the fresh round of talks as they believe the focus of the government emissaries would be to convince Muivah to help end the deadlock in Manipur rather then taking the peace process forward.

‘Any issue involving Nagas of Nagaland, Eastern Nagaland (Myanmar) and other Naga areas (in Manipur, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh) should be left alone. The meeting (Tuesday) should in no way be considered as political talks between the government of India and the Nagas as it is clearly a localized issue revolving around an individual’s visit to his native village in Manipur,’ a statement by the NSCN-IM said.

Manipur is in turmoil since April. First, Naga groups residing in Manipur enforced an indefinite economic blockade protesting the state government’s decision to hold autonomous council elections.

The decision by Muivah to visit his ancestral village in Manipur’s Ukhrul district led to bloody clashes. Three people were killed in police firing May 6.

The Manipur government has banned Muivah’s visit saying it would incite tension.

The deadlock over the issue has led to several Naga groups enforcing an indefinite economic blockade of Manipur. Hundreds of trucks carrying food and essential goods have been stranded in Nagaland as protesters have laid seige to National Highway 39 – the main lifeline to Manipur.

This has triggered a food crisis in Manipur, with the state forced to airlift supplies of even medicines. Hospitals have been compelled to stop routine surgeries due to dearth of oxygen cylinders.

‘No matter the amount of animosity, hatred and bad blood between Manipur government and Nagas of Manipur, emotion should not betray sanity and reason,’ the NSCN-IM statement said, adding that the Meiteis (the majority community in Manipur) and Nagas of Manipur would ‘co-exist for as long as man walks on earth’.

During earlier talks, the NSCN-IM had proposed ‘a special federal arrangement’ to enable the Nagas self-governance but the negotiations ended inconclusively.

‘It was agreed in earlier meetings to explore and discuss our demand for a special federal relationship between India and Nagalim (Greater Nagaland) that allows us self-governance,’ a senior NSCN-IM leader told IANS.

The NSCN-IM has been struggling for nearly six decades to create a ‘Greater Nagaland’ by slicing off parts of three neighbouring states to unite 1.2 million Nagas. The demand is opposed by Assam, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh.

The rebel leadership blamed New Delhi for failing to meet their demands — even 13 years after the ceasefire.

‘The progress of the talks is very slow. We cannot be patient always as there is a limit to everything though we believe in a political solution to our problem rather than a military one,’ the NSCN-IM leader said.

Hamas renews offer to end fight if Israel withdraws

(Reuters) – Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal has stated explicitly that the Palestinian Islamist group will end its armed struggle against Israel if the Jewish state withdraws from Palestinian land it occupied in the 1967 Middle East War.

World

Hamas, which refuses to recognize Israel, has long maintained that it will enter into a long-term truce if Israel pulls out of the West Bank and East Jerusalem and agrees to a right of return for millions of Palestinian refugees.

Speaking on the Charlie Rose program on U.S. PBS television, Meshaal directly addressed the issue of armed resistance, which is the basis of its ideology as a national liberation movement.

“Israel started (the conflict) by the occupation so the resistance is a reaction. The action is the occupation, and the reaction from the Palestinians is that it ends,” Meshaal said, in an interview taped on Thursday, according to a transcript released by PBS.

“So when the occupation comes to an end, the resistance will end, as simple as that. If Israel would go to the 1967 borders … that will be the end of the Palestinian resistance.”

Meshaal said if a “Palestinian state with real sovereignty” were established under the conditions he set out, then the nature of any subsequent ties with Israel would be decided democratically by the Palestinians.

Hamas has ruled Gaza since it won a brief civil war in 2007 against supporters of Western-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’s more secular Fatah faction, creating a schism that has undermined the Palestinian cause.

Hamas opposes the indirect peace talks started last month between the Palestinian Authority headed by Abbas and Israel, saying Abbas will compromise on national rights.

The movement had said it could live peacefully alongside Israel if a two-state solution was reached in which all occupied Palestinian land was returned, even though its 1988 founding charter calls for the destruction of Israel and the establishment of a Palestinian state in all of pre-1948 British-mandate Palestine.

(Editing by Kevin Liffey)

ANALYSIS – Syria seeks room to manoeuvre in harsh region

Syria, a middling Arab country formally at war with Israel over the occupied Golan Heights, must juggle its alliances to survive in a volatile Middle East.

Threats of a new conflict have ricocheted between Syria, Israel, Iran and Lebanon this year, especially after Israeli and U.S. talk of alleged Syrian arms transfers to Lebanese Hezbollah fighters, although leaders on all sides deny they want a fight.

Impatient with the United States, but keeping the door ajar, President Bashar al-Assad is clinging to an Iranian-led “resistance” camp, while signalling readiness to resume indirect peace talks with Israel via Turkey, a former foe turned friend.

“We cannot wait any longer,” he told Italy’s La Repubblica newspaper this week. “President (Barack) Obama’s America had raised expectations regarding a new Middle East policy. But now the clock of history is striking a new hour.”

Syria was now forging a regional order with Russia as well as Turkey and Iran, rather than relying on Western powers.

“This is not a turnabout,” said Assad, who has ruled Syria for nearly 10 years. “We want good relations with Washington. Rather it is about recognising reality: the failure by America and Europe in solving the problems of the world, in our region.”

Whether any new alignment will have better luck remains to be seen — even Assad acknowledged that the United States would play a decisive role in the final stage of any peace settlement.

Syria has emerged from the isolation it endured after the 2005 assassination of Lebanese statesman Rafik al-Hariri. It denied responsibility but was forced to pull its troops out of Lebanon after an outcry led by Washington, Paris and Riyadh.

SLOW GOING

Obama’s “engagement” with Syria has proved frustrating for both sides — Congress has yet to confirm a U.S. ambassador to Damascus named in February after a five-year hiatus. Obama has renewed sanctions on Syria, while easing some in practice.

Some Syrians view the glass as half-full.

“The American school is about to re-open, the ambassador has been named, there have been high-level visits from U.S. officials and a blind eye to some of the sanctions,” said Sami Moubayed, a historian. “Relations are nowhere as bad as they were under George W. Bush. Are we in a honeymoon? Not yet.”

Reviled as an “evil-doer” by Obama’s predecessor Bush, Syria has calmed some Western concerns about its behaviour in the region, just as the intended U.S. troop pullout from Iraq has assuaged some Syrian fears about Western militarism.

“Their external isolation is reduced,” a Western diplomat said. “It’s not that Syria has done nothing. Across the regional issues there has been limited progress in all areas.”

Ticking them off, he said Damascus had re-set relations with Lebanon after improving ties with Saudi Arabia. The flow of foreign militants into Iraq had all but ceased as U.S. pullout plans crystallised. Syria clearly wanted a stable, unified Iraq.

Turkish-mediated talks with Israel had made progress until the Gaza war halted them in December 2008. Syria had neither helped nor hindered U.S.-led efforts on the Palestinian track.

“Where concerns remain is weapons transfers to Hezbollah — real concerns about that — and to a lesser extent the relationship with Hamas, although Syria isn’t seen as a primary supplier of weapons in that case,” the diplomat said.

For Syria, the end-goal of any U.S. engagement is the return of the Golan Heights, captured by Israel in 1967, Moubayed said.

“A credible, sustainable deal needs the United States. So far Obama has been helpless at moving that track forward. You need to jump-start talks on the Golan,” he declared.

Prospects for renewing indirect talks via Turkey seem dim after Turkish criticism of Israeli policy in recent months.

“The Turks and Syrians are ready, but the Israelis aren’t. They say the Turks are no longer impartial,” Moubayed said.

Instead, Syria and Israel have been talking more of war than peace, although for now neither seems to want a confrontation.

INFLUENCE IN LEBANON

In Lebanon, arena of a 2006 Israeli-Hezbollah war, Syria’s allies have effective veto power in the government. Hariri’s son Saad has visited Damascus twice as Lebanese prime minister.

That alone indicates how much influence Syria has regained in the neighbour it dominated during its 29-year troop presence.

“In Lebanon, Syria has never been this close to having a full house,” said Peter Harling, the International Crisis Group’s Syria analyst, citing a spectrum of relationships.

Apart from its warm ties with Shi’ites through Hezbollah, Syria can manage Lebanon’s Sunni community via Hariri and the Saudis, and has won over key Christian leaders, as well as Druze chieftain Walid Jumblatt, once its bitterest critic.

Syria has made such gains without heeding U.S-Israeli pressure to ditch its alliances with Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas.

Assad mingles with Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah as easily as he does with Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan and the Emir of Qatar.

“Syria is trying to keep one foot in the resistance camp and one in this more pragmatic camp in the middle,” Harling said.

“Its strength lies in its ability to juggle relationships and the ambiguity and ambivalence of its foreign policy.”

(Editing by Samia Nakhoul)

Philippine Muslim rebels remove rogue commander

The Philippines’ largest Muslim guerrilla group has removed a commander the government blames for an escalation of violence in 2008, saying they wanted to revive momentum in peace talks under a new administration.

A workable and sustained resolution of the conflict would remove a long-term investment risk in the Philippines, and potentially could attract investment to offshore oil and gas reserves and untapped mines on the southern island.

Ustadz Ameril Ombra Kato, radical commander of the 105th base of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), has been replaced by one of his more-moderate subordinates, Zacaria Goma, pending an inquiry, MILF chief peace negotiator Mohaqher Iqbal said.

“Kato is no longer connected with our military arm,” Iqbal told Reuters, saying the foreign-trained Islamic cleric has been given a job in the rebel group’s Da’wah religious department.

“It’s part of our reorganisation to build more confidence and give a fresh start to peace negotiations under the next government. We only want to show how serious we are in pursuing peace.”

Senator Benigno Aquino III is expected to be declared the next President by Congress in coming weeks. Unofficial tallies of votes show he has a large lead over his nearest rival.

The MILF has also replaced the head of its ceasefire panel and the spokesman for its military arm, Iqbal said.

“At the strategic level, Kato’s dismissal augurs well for the peace process because this could indicate the moderates are now taking the upper hand in the power struggle within the MILF,” an army intelligence officer on Mindanao island, where the MILF is based, told Reuters.

PEACE TALKS

Since 1997 there have been off-and-on negotiations between the government and Muslim rebels to end a conflict that has run more than 40 years, killing 120,000 people and displacing 2 million in the south of the mainly Roman Catholic country.

Moderate leaders of the 11,000-strong MILF have dropped demands for an independent Islamic state but want more than just an autonomous government, including a greater share of revenues generated by strategic resources such as oil, gas and metals.

In August 2008, a deal to create a Muslim ancestral homeland with wide political and economic powers was blocked by the Supreme Court after some politicians challenged the agreement.

The aborted deal led to an escalation in fighting, and nearly 750,000 people were displaced by almost a year of hostilities. The government has filed cases in Mindanao courts saying Kato and two other commanders were behind the violence.

A renewed truce took effect last year and formal talks resumed this year with the intention of reaching an interim agreement before the end of President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo’s term on June 30, but a deal has not yet been reached.

The two sides will return to Kuala Lumpur this month to try to reach an interim deal before Arroyo steps down. (Reporting by Manny Mogato; Editing by John Mair and Alex Richardson)

Thai government says has no position on peace talks

The Thai government is aware of an offer on Tuesday by a group of senators to broker talks with thousands of protesters but has no official position on whether to accept it, a government spokesman said.

“We have no position on that yet. The prime minister has been informed but does not have an immediate position on it,” said government spokesman Panitan Wattanayagorn.

“Our top priority right now is to end the rioting that traps civilians in the area. But we are not rejecting or accepting the senators’ offer yet.”

A leader of “red shirt” anti-government protesters said on Tuesday they had agreed to participate in talks brokered by the speaker of the Senate in order to prevent further casualties.

At least 38 people have died in the latest flare-up in violence in Bangkok since May 13.

(Reporting by Ambika Ahuja; Editing by Jason Szep)

No end in sight to Thai government- Red Shirts standoff in bloody Bangkok

Bangkok, May 18 (ANI): The standoff between Thai security forces and Red Shirt protestors continued with the government firmly refusing to recall troops or hold further talks until the rally ended.

The breakdown of the negotiations was the last straw for the government, and it has been amassing massive army reinforcements to flush out the remaining protestors.

Incidentally, most of the angry young men whose angst had thus far spearheaded the protests have left the disputed site and only old people, women and children remain.

The government had issued a deadline of 3 pm for the protestors to vacate the area on Monday which resulted in the departure of many young protestors, but some stayed back.

The establishment’s original plans to advance into the area have now been deferred amidst fears about the possibility of an extremely high casualty count if they proceed.

Gen Anupong, chief of the Royal Thai Army, did not want the security forces to be hastily deployed as he was concerned about the risk of casualties among troops and protesters, the Bangkok Post reports.

“When we”re ready, we”ll reach our final goal at the Ratchaprasong intersection. But right now, there”s still a high risk of lots of casualties,” a CRES source said.

Meanwhile Red Shirt leader Natthawut Saikua is still hoping for a resumption of peace talks.

“Mr Abhisit should not rule out potential talks based on the fact that the earlier rounds failed,” he said. “Even though this may take time, I believe it”s better than letting the killings continue.”

He has also said he won’t be clearing the rally site in a hurry and is hopeful of a positive response to a request the UDD had sent to the UN for them to step in and mediate in the negotiations.

Former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra has also joined the UDD in their call for UN intervention.

Korbsak Sabhavasu, secretary-general to the prime minister, made it clear the renewed negotiations would never come about until the demonstrators dispersed, the paper said.

“Negotiations can happen if the protest stops and its leaders surrender. But if this does not happen, they [the UDD leaders] should tell the mobs to stop the rioting and the burning of the city and tyres. As Mr Natthawut said he could issue orders, does this mean that he ordered the mobs to create violence?” Mr Korbsak said. (ANI)

JI chief demands dialogue with Taliban in Pak

Lahore, May 16 (ANI): Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) chief Syed Munawwar Hasan has asked the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) led Government to initiate peace talks with the Taliban, saying if dialogue can be restarted with India then there should also be no harm in deliberations with the extremist outfit.

“If composite dialogue can be held with India again and again, why not to engage Taliban of our own country,” The Dawn quoted Hasan, as saying.

Hasan said in order to counter the immense pressure being applied by the US on Pakistan to start an offensive in North Waziristan, the government should ‘immediately’ stop using force against the extremists and try to engage them in talks.

He said that while the Swat Taliban leader Sufi Muhammad was accused of violating the Constitution, other political parties continue to defy the country’s charter with the government turning a blind eye towards them.

“ (Former President) General Pervez Musharraf abrogated the Constitution twice but instead of punishment, he was given a red carpet farewell,” Hasan told media persons here.

He also claimed that the government had scraped the peace agreement inked with Sufi Muhammad under Washington’s pressure. (ANI)

Darfur clash kills 57 officers, rebels: police

Darfur’s strongest rebel group clashed with Sudanese government forces guarding a convoy, sparking a gunfight that killed 57 officers and insurgents, police said.

The fighting in South Darfur state late on Thursday is the latest in a surge of violence in the remote territory since the suspension of peace talks between Khartoum and the rebel Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) last week.

Sudanese police accused JEM of attacking a commercial convoy between the town of Al Deain and the capital of south Darfur Nyala, saying officers guarding the vehicles fought off the assault.

A total of 27 members of Sudan’s Central Reserve Police and 30 JEM fighters died in the fighting, police spokesman Mohamed Abdul Majid said in a statement. He added that 87 people from both sides were wounded.

JEM told Reuters its troops came across Sudanese army forces guarding a convoy of military vehicles and ammunition trucks and said the soldiers had fired the first shots.

“A convoy of 165 vehicles of SAF (Sudan Armed Forces) were trying to attack some of our redeployed mobile units in the south of Darfur. We met them. It was a very fierce battle. Those 165 military vehicles and all the forces have been completely rounded up,” senior JEM official Al-Tahir al-Feki said.

JEM is one of two rebel forces that took up arms against Sudan’s government in 2003, accusing it of marginalising the region’s population and starving it of funding.

President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who mobilised militias to crush the uprising, is facing International Criminal Court charges of masterminding war crimes in the region.

Sudanese authorities have accused JEM of attacking and looting villages across Darfur in recent weeks.

JEM denied the accusations and said it was sending out mobile “administrative” units across Darfur and the neighbouring oil-producing region of South Kordofan to reach out to local leaders and maintain links with outposts.

“When Sudan forces attack us we have to respond,” Feki said.

He also denied reports from international sources, who asked not to be named, that JEM forces had destroyed mobile phone masts, cutting off communications along a corridor from their stronghold in West Darfur, southeast towards South Kordofan.

JEM signed a ceasefire and initial peace deal with Khartoum during talks brokered by the government of neighbouring Chad in February. Chad’s President Idriss Deby shares ethnic links with JEM’s leadership.

Further talks quickly stalled when JEM objected to Khartoum’s decision to start separate discussions with another rebel grouping, and the insurgents last week said they were suspending talks in protest against government bombing raids on their bases.

(Reporting by Andrew Heavens; editing by Michael Roddy)

PLO convenes, to agree peace talks with Israel

The Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) convened on Saturday and was expected to approve indirect peace talks with Israel, clearing the way for the first negotiations in 18 months.

The PLO executive committee, meeting in Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, would approve a U.S. proposal for indirect talks which will be mediated by U.S. Middle East envoy George Mitchell, committee members said.

The United States has sought to revive the peace process, calling the Middle East conflict a “vital national security interest”. However many doubt whether the latest U.S. effort can succeed where years of diplomacy have failed.

The United States proposed the indirect talks as a way to break an impasse over Jewish settlement construction on Israeli-occupied land where the Palestinians aim to establish a state alongside Israel.

The United States said last week it expected the indirect negotiations, known as “proximity talks”, to move forward before Mitchell’s departure from the region, scheduled for Sunday.

Mitchell is set to meet Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas later on Saturday.

“The (PLO) executive committee will approve proximity talks but we are against it,” said committee member Bassem al-Salhi of the People’s Party. The PLO is dominated by the Fatah faction led by Abbas. The Arab League last week approved four months of indirect negotiations.

(Reporting by Ali Sawafta and Mohammed Assadi; Writing by Tom Perry)

PLO President gets go ahead for indirect peace talks with Israel

Dubai, May 8 (ANI): Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) President Mahmud Abbas was on Saturday given the go ahead for holding indirect peace talks with Israel.

Reports from Ramallah quoted Fatah Deputy Secretary General, Jibril Rajub, as saying: “The Palestinian leadership has approved the proximity talks.”

He was speaking after a meeting of the PLO Executive Committee.

According to reports, the talks will be brokered by the United States.

The Palestinians will hand over a letter of acceptance in this regard to US President Barack Obama”s special Middle East envoy George Mitchell later today. (ANI)

Pak must ‘take out’ LeT, other terror groups following ‘fair’ Kasab trial: Editorial

Islamabad, May 5 (ANI): Terming the trial and the verdict of the special anti-terror court against Ajmal Amir Kasab, the lone surviving gunman who along with his nine other associates unleashed a reign of death and destruction for nearly three days in November 2008 in Mumbai, as ‘fair’, an editorial in one of Pakistan’s leading English dailies has stressed that after the verdict it has become more important for Pakistan to nab people like Hafeez Muhammed Saeed and Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi if it really wants peace talks with India to succeed.

The Daily Times editorial pointed out that the Kasab’s verdict highlights the ‘impartality’ of the Indian judiciary and that Pakistan must “gain a little wisdom from the whole episode both politically and judicially.”

“If the resumption of dialogue and mutual understanding is to be demonstrated with India, we must accept this verdict for what it is: one that is fair and an example of the impartial Indian judicial tradition,” the editorial said.

It said that as the Indian court has held both the Jammat-ud-Daawa (JuD) chief Hafeez Muhammed Saeed and Lashkar-e-Taiba’s (LeT) operations commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi responsible for the terror attacks, it was for Pakistan’s own interest that it nabs these terrorist leaders.

“In the interests of justice and regional harmony, any lingering sympathy for these terrorist organisations should not allow anyone to escape the long arm of the law. No matter where the trail leads, we ought to take a cue from judicial structures that have a history of more respect and independence than ours and translate charges and accusations into full-scale investigations and trials,” the editorial went on to add.

While many Pakistanis may have denounced the verdict against Kasab, saying he has been specially targeted, the editorial said that people’s reaction over the court’s decision was due to the fact that Pakistan does not have a definite benchmark of legal standards.

It added that Pakistan’s judiciary system has been highly politicised, however, in India politics and judiciary have stayed clear of each other.

“Pakistan is the victim of a judicial system that has unfortunately been highly politicised in our history, but India is starkly different, as the judiciary has steered clear of politics,” the editorial said. (ANI)