Woman’s touch can fuel risk-taking behaviour

Washington, May 12 (ANI): A comforting, maternal pat on the back can make a person throw caution to the wind, concludes a new study.

The research has been published online in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

If a female experimenter patted a participant on the back, they”d risk more money than if she just talked to them, or if a man did the patting, the study found.

The researchers think this comes from the way that mothers use touch to make their babies feel secure. When we are infants, we receive a lot of touch from our mothers. This creates a sense of attachment, which makes a baby feel secure. This helps the youngster”s sense of adventure; they”re more willing to take the risks that come with exploring unfamiliar contexts and strange situations.

Jonathan Levav of Columbia University and Jennifer J. Argo of the University of Alberta wanted to know what happens when those babies grow up: Does physical contact also affect how willing adults are to take risks?

Participants were tested to see if they would take risks, such as investing money or taking a gamble. When they started the experiment, they were greeted in different ways: by a female or male experimenter and with a light, comforting touch on the shoulder, a handshake, or no physical contact at all. At the end of the experiment, they also filled out surveys that assessed how secure they felt. The researchers found that participants who were touched felt more secure and took bigger risks than those who weren”t – but only if they were touched by a woman. The effect was stronger for a touch on the back than for a handshake, but went away entirely for participants who were touched by a man.

The results suggest that a woman”s touch works the same on adults as it does on infants: making them feel more secure and more willing to take risks. (ANI)

12 Queenslanders honoured with bravery awards

Twelve Queenslanders who saved others from fire, floods or violence have received Australian Bravery Awards.

Among them was David Coker, who received his award for protecting his girlfriend who was shot in the leg during the Mumbai terrorist attack in India in November, 2008.

He was holidaying with his girlfriend Kate Anstee during the terrorist attack.

Mr Coker fled the cafe where they had been sitting before realising she was not still with him.

He ran back to find she had been shot in the leg.

The 23-year-old shielded Ms Anstee with his body and then found a taxi to take them both to safety.

“I was so focused on her and initially getting to her and then getting both of us to some sort of relative safety, that you don’t consciously think, ‘oh, this is going to be a bit dangerous’,” he said.

Rockhampton rescue

Mark Pacey helped rescued a family from floodwaters near Rockhampton in central Queensland in February 2008.

He will receive a bravery medal for his role in saving Nathan Thompson and his six-month-old baby from a swollen creek at Gogango in February 2008.

“The pat on the back is for going back and seeing what I hit in the first place – if I hadn’t done that, I guess I wouldn’t have seen them hit what I hit – I hit a log underwater,” he said.

“I don’t know how it would’ve turned out otherwise because it was late at night, it was dark, it was raining – not a lot of good things in their favour.”

He and other rescuers tried to save the child’s mother, 36-year-old Kelly Bock, but she could not be revived.

Mr Pacey says the rescue was a bitter sweet experience and it was sad that Ms Bock drowned.

“I’m not to say that I’m not happy that the family got out and we saved the bub and Nathan – that is good,” he said.

“I kind of felt bittersweet, because although they got Kelly out, she died.

“That put a real dampener on it – they would have had a family and a wife.”

The bravery commendations also honoured Rhonda Canton, who protected another woman from a violent man, as well as David Marek, who tried to save his drowning brother.

Swine flu could kill as many as 30,000 to 90,000 people in US

Washington, August 25 (ANI): In a recently released report, the Obama administration’s advisory group on Science and Technology has said that the H1N1 flu virus, dubbed ‘Swine flu’, could cause as many as 30,000 and 90,000 deaths in the United States and pose a serious health threat.

According to Fox News, deaths would be concentrated among children and young adults, determined the report.

In contrast, the typical seasonal flu kills between 30,000 and 40,000 annually – mainly among people over 65.

The report predicts 1.8 million will be hospitalized during the epidemic, with up to 300,000 patients requiring intensive care units.

These patients could occupy 50-100 percent of all ICU beds in affected regions at the peak of the epidemic and would place “enormous stress” on ICU units.

More needs to be done to speed up the “preparation of flu vaccine for distribution to high-risk individuals,” otherwise the vaccine campaign – currently scheduled to begin in mid October – will have potentially missed the peak of the epidemic, according to the report.

The report from the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, PCAST, shows a sober assessment of the dangers of a pandemic, but also serves as a pat on the back for a White House preparing for its first public health crisis.

“Based on the history of influenza pandemics over the past hundred years, PCAST places the current outbreak somewhere between the two extremes that have informed public opinion about influenza,” stated the report.

“On the one hand, the 2009-H1N1 virus does not thus far seem to show the virulence associated with the devastating pandemic of 1918-19. On the other hand, the 2009-H1N1 virus is a serious threat to our nation and the world,” it added.

This is due to the likelihood that more people will be infected because so few people have immunity to the strain.

As a result, PCAST recommends that the Food and Drug Administration “accelerate a decision about the availability of antiviral drugs for intravenous use.”

The current expectation is that the vaccine will be available in mid-October.

According to Harold Varmus, PCAST co-chair and President of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, despite the long ‘to-do’ list, the Obama administration has thus far done a good job of preparing for a national outbreak.

“The Federal Government’s response has been truly impressive and we’ve all been pleased to see the high level of cooperation among the many departments and agencies that are gearing up for the expected fall resurgence of H1N1 flu,” he said. (ANI)