Indian officials should respect Pakistan’s courts: Malik

The Pakistan government honours the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the release from house arrest of JuD chief Hafiz Saeed and Indian authorities should accord “similar respect to the verdicts of Pakistani courts,” Interior Minister Rehman Malik said today.

Malik made the remarks while talking to reporters a day after the apex court upheld the Lahore High Court’s decision to free Saeed from house arrest and dismissed appeals filed by the federal and Punjab governments challenging his release.

The Interior Minister said Indian authorities should show the same respect for verdicts of Pakistani courts as that shown by the Pakistan government.

“We had also honoured the Indian court’s decision against Ajmal Kasab,” Malik said, referring to the death sentence recently awarded by an Indian court to the Pakistani national for his role in the 2008 Mumbai attacks.

India yesterday expressed disappointment over Pakistan Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the release of Saeed, whom New Delhi has blamed for masterminding the Mumbai attacks.

Indian officials have said they have provided sufficient evidence against Saeed to Pakistani authorities.

Malik also called for a joint struggle against terrorism by Pakistan, India and Afghanistan.

He said Faisal Shahzad, the Pakistani-American arrested by the US for a botched car bomb attack in New York, had links in the restive South Waziristan tribal region.

An investigation into these links is underway though no one has so far been arrested, he said.

“Faisal Shahzad had links in South Waziristan and his accounts are the focus of our investigation,” Malik said.

Media reports, however, said Pakistani authorities had detained 11 suspects, including an army major, for alleged links with Shahzad.

Lakhvi likely to walk free like Saeed thanks to legal lacunas in Pak: Legal expert

Washington, May 26 (ANI): The Pakistan Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the Lahore High Court’s verdict acquitting Jamaat-ud-Daawa (JuD) chief Hafeez Mohammed Saeed of all terror charges may have come as a shocker for many, particularly India, but legal experts believe that the decision comes as “no surprise,” as the prosecution was hampered by a lack of admissible evidence.

According to Ahmed Bilal Soofi, a Supreme Court lawyer and expert on international law, Saeed’s acquittal would also increase difficulties in the prosecution of Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the founding leader and the operations chief of the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), who is currently undergoing trial at anti-terror court along with six of his other aides who worked as key conspirators in the November 2008 Mumbai terror attacks.

“Transnational crime prosecution between two countries is a very challenging assignment. Regrettably, in Pakistan as well as in India, there is no effective legislation for Mutual Legal Assistance, and the ultimate beneficiaries are the terrorists,” The Christian Science Monitor quoted Soofi, as saying.

Pakistan has a long history of first arresting and then later releasing extremist leaders when it feels they can be of use to its strategic aims.

The apex court’s decision may also have a negative impact on the renewed peace efforts between India and Pakistan, with New Delhi already expressing its disappointment over the court’s judgement to allow Saeed, the mastermind of the November 2008 Mumbai carnage, to walk free.

“India hopes Pakistan will take meaningful action against Saeed. We are disappointed over at Saeed being let off by Pakistan,” Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao had said soon after the Pakistan Supreme Court declared Saeed a ‘free man’ due to lack of evidence against him. (ANI)

Kasab’s confessional statement presented before Pak Supreme Court

Islamabad, May 12 (ANI): The confessional statement of Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving gunman of the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks was presented before the Pakistan Supreme Court.

Khawaja Sultan Ahmed, lawyer for Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, a suspect in the Mumbai terrorist attacks case, presented the statement on Tuesday before a three-member SC bench – comprising Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.

The apex court bench adjourned the hearing for two weeks after receiving Kasab’s statement, which is in English and Hindi.

The court observed that it required time to go through the long confessional statement, the Daily Times reports.

The bench was hearing an appeal filed by Lakhvi, one of the seven suspects being tried by an anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi.

In his confessional statement, Kasab named Lakhvi as the ringleader in connection with the Mumbai terror attacks.

Ahmed however argued that Kasab’s confessional statement had no legal value in Pakistan.

“The statement was not given in a Pakistani court, so Lakhvi cannot be named as a co-accused in the case or be tried,” he said. (ANI)

Table Kasab’s confessional statement: Pak SC to Lakhvi’s counsel

Islamabad, May 6 (ANI): A three-member Pakistan Supreme Court bench, consisting Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, has asked for the confessional statement of Ajmal Amir Kasab, the lone surviving Mumbai terror attack gunman.

Hearing a petition filed by Lashkar-e-Taiba’s (LeT) operations commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, who has been named as one of the chief conspirator of the November 2008 Mumbai attacks, the apex court told Lakhvi’s lawyer, Sultan Khwaja to table Kasab’s confessional statement, which he made in a special anti-terror court in Mumbai.

Khwaja argued before the court that Lakhvi cannot be named a co-accused in the Mumbai attack case or be tried on the basis of Kasab’s statement.

“The statement was not given in a Pakistani court, so Lakhvi could not be named as a co-accused in the case or be tried,” Khwaja pleaded during the hearing over Lakhvi’s petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings against him.

Following the argument, the court directed Khwaja to table Kasab’s statement in the court on the next hearing, and the hearing was adjourned till May 11, The Daily Times reports.

Talking to reporters after the hearing, Khwaja , who is defending the seven men being tried by an anti-terrorism court for abetting and planning the ghastly Mumbai attacks, said his clients would actually be benefited from the verdict of the special Mumbai court, which has convicted Kasab and acquitted the other two Indian’s accused of providing logistical support to the masterminds.

The special anti-terror court, which has been set up inside the Arthur road Jail in Mumbai, would announce the quantum of punishment for Kasab today (Thursday, May 6). (ANI)

Non-implementation of NRO verdict: Why Gilani should not be notified asks Pak SC

Islamabad, Apr.30 (ANI): Reprimanding the authorities over non-implementation of its verdict on the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) even after four months, the Pakistan Supreme Court has asked as to why it should not issue notice to the Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani.

During a suo motu hearing against the non-implementation of the NRO verdict, Justice Raja Fayyaz Ahmed asked Deputy Attorney General Agha Tariq Mehmood as to why the apex court’s orders have not been implement in real terms.

“The prime minister represents the government, so it’s his responsibility to ensure implementation of the NRO verdict. What is happening?” Justice Ahmed asked.

“Why are the government functionaries delaying the implementation of the NRO verdict? What about compliance with the court’s orders?” he said when Mehmood pleaded the court to grant more time for implementing its verdict.

Mehmood told the court that the Prime Minister had ordered a fact-finding inquiry to look into the issues, but documents regarding his orders could not be procured.

The apex court then asked him to produce all documents regarding the developments in the case before it during the next hearing. (ANI)

Now, a multi-billion dollar LNG contract scam in Pak surfaces

Islamabad, Apr.22 (ANI): In yet another massive scam that could run into billion of dollars, the Pakistan Supreme Court has been told that a French company was awarded two contracts for the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) without even participating in the bidding procedure.

During a hearing, Petroleum Ministry’s special secretary G A Sabari told the apex court that the French company, GDF Suez, had neither applied for the short term (five years) 3.5 million tons gas supply nor for the long term (20 years), as required under the bidding laws.

Despite that fact the French company was given both the contracts worth 25 billion dollars in February 2010 in the Economic Coordination Committee presided over by Shaukat Tarin on the recommendation of Petroleum Ministry bosses, The News reports.

The Supreme Court was also told that the that Sui Sounthern Gas Company had also recommended to give the short-term gas supply contract to Shell through a letter dated May 2, 2009, without calling any tenders and bids.

Sabari also told the court that initially 53 companies, which were finally shortlisted to 10, were in the race for the gas supply deal, but ultimately GDF-Suez, which didn’t even feature in the list was awarded the contract. (ANI)

Pak SC asks accountability bureau to ‘stop playing hide and seek’ over Zardari’s immunity

Islamabad, Mar.13 (ANI): Reprimanding the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) over its dilly-dallying attitude, the Pakistan Supreme Court has asked the bureau to “stop playing hide and seek” over the immunity status granted to President Asif Ali Zardari and seek the custody of the documents relating to the 60 million dollar money laundering case which the government had withdrawn from Swiss courts.

“For how long will this hide and seek continue,” asked Justice Javed Iqbal while hearing a fraud case.

Noting that it is the apex court only which has the authority to interpret the Constitution, Iqbal directed the bureau to submit an application explaining whether any one enjoyed immunity under the Constitution.

“Neither the NRO judgment is person-specific nor the court is interested in personalities,” The Dawn quoted Iqbal, as saying.

NAB’s acting chairman Irfan Nadeem told the court that the bureau had written a letter to the law ministry seeking instructions for reviving the corruption cases since the President enjoyed immunity under Article 248 of the Constitution.

“The ministry in turn referred the matter to the Attorney General’s office and its reply was still awaited,” he added. (ANI)

Musharraf ‘shedding crocodile tears’, says ex- Pak SCBA chief

Islamabad, Sep.19 (ANI): Pakistan Supreme Court Bar Association’s former President Aitzaz Ahsan has said that former President General Pervez Musharraf is ‘shedding crocodile tears’ while admitting that removing Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry from office in 2007 was a mistake.

Referring to Musharraf’s speech at Trinity University in Saint Antonio, Texas, where the former general admitted that he had committed a mistake while sacking the then Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) from office, Ahsan said Musharraf had committed not only one but two mistakes by removing the higher judiciary and imposing an emergency in the country on November 3, 2007.

Talking to a private television channel, Ahsan said the government and the ‘independent’ judiciary should play their role in trying Musharraf under high treason charges.

He said it was not the right time for lawyers to take their struggle to roads, as they did previously while demanding restoration of the judiciary, The News reports.

Meanwhile, the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) has denied that Musharraf had taken the cabinet into his confidence before promulgating the Provisional Constitutional Ordinance (PCO) and imposing the emergency rule in 2007.

Interacting with media persons during an Iftaar party hosted by PML-Q President Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, several party leaders rejected the notion regarding Musharraf consulting the cabinet before taking the illegal and extra-judicial actions. (ANI)

Pak SC to hear petitions challenging Saeed’s acquittal today

Islamabad, July 13 (ANI): The Pakistan Supreme Court would start the hearing into the two separate petitions filed by the Punjab government and the federal government respectively challenging the acquittal of the Jamaat-ud-Daawa (JuD) chief Hafiz Muhammad Saeed and Colonel (retired) Nazir Ahmed today (Monday).

Challenging the Lahore High Court’s (LHC) verdict to release both leaders, of the banned terror outfit, the petition states that the judgment had emphasised a “faulty assertion” that the detaining authority had no evidence to justify the detention of the accused, The Daily Times reports.

The petitions said that the LHC’s decision highlights that the court didn’t consider the sensitivity of the case, even when there is a massive terror threat looming over the country.

On June 2, a full bench of the Lahore High Court had ordered Saeed’s release from house arrest on the basis of a habeas corpus petition filed by his lawyer.

The high court said that it had not received substantial evidence to continue the detention of Saeed, the prime accused of the November 2008 Mumbai attacks.

The court also ordered the release of Colonel (retired) Nazir Ahmad, one of the top leaders of the JuD.

Saeed was put under house arrest on December 11 last year, day after the JuD, the political wing of the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) was declared a terrorist group by the United Nations (UN). (ANI)

Pak death row inmate Sarabjit Singh’s mercy plea forwarded to Zardari

Lahore, July 9 (ANI): Sarabjit Singh’s mercy plea, requesting that his death sentence be commuted to life imprisonment, has been forwarded to Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari, The Daily Times reports.

The plea was moved after the Supreme Court rejected Singh’s petition challenging the death sentence awarded to him earlier.

The Pakistan Supreme Court on June 24 had dismissed the review petition filed by Singh after his lawyer, Rana Abdul Hameed failed to appear before the court.

Hameed was not able to reach the court on time and missed the proceedings, which worked against the case and an ex-parte order was passed by the court.

Later, Singh was given a new lawyer to represent him in the court.

Singh, who is currently languishing in the Kot Lakhpat jail, is a resident of Amritsar.

He was arrested near the Kasur border in Pakistan in August 1990.

Pakistan security agencies said that Singh had admitted that he was sent to Pakistan to carry out serial bomb blasts in Lahore, Faislabad, and Kasur, and was trained by the Indian Army, and the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW).

Singh was awarded the death sentence by a Lahore anti-terrorism court in October 1991.

He challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court, however, the apex court quashed his appeal in September, 2005, saying that the review petition was not filed within the time period as mentioned in the law.

In March 2006, a two member Supreme Court bench dismissed Singh’s petition against his conviction in the Lahore’s Yakki Gate bomb blast in 1990.

Singh has been languishing in Pakistan jails for the last 28 years, as Pakistan has denied setting him free, despite continuous efforts by the Indian diplomatic channels. (ANI)

Petition against US drone attacks filed in Pak SC

Islamabad, July 2 (ANI): A petition has been filed in the Pakistan Supreme Court asking the government to table a comprehensive report on the US led drone strikes inside the geographical boundaries of the country.

The petition has been filed by one M. Tariq Asad, who claimed that only innocent tribal people are being killed in the drone strikes.

“I have filed the petition in the Supreme Court as a protest to let the world know about the sentiments of the people of Pakistan on consecutive drone attacks which are killing scores of people,” The Dawn quoted Asad, as saying.

Asad, in his petition, has also asked the apex court to give directions to the federal government to approach the International Court of Justice or the United Nations (UN) against the United States.

The petition termed the ongoing military operation in Swat and Malakand Divisions as ‘illegal, and said that it was against the citizens, and in derogation of Article 245 (functions of the armed forces) of the Constitution.

“The war against the citizens is not permitted under the 1973 Constitution, besides the military operation against the civilians also does not fall within the purview of Article 245 of the Constitution,” the petition stated.

Incidentally, Asad is the same man who had approached the Supreme Court against the Lal Masjid operation in 2007.

Asad, who himself is a lawyer, also represented some of the families of the missing persons in that case. (ANI)

A ray of hope for the Sarabjit Singh from Pakistan’s apex court

Bhikhiwind (Punjab), June 21 (ANI): A ray of hope has emerged here for Sarabjit Singh alias Manjeet Singh’s family, as his lawyer will file a review petition against his hanging at the Pakistani Supreme Court on Monday.

Sarbjit’s wife Sukhpreet Kaur, daughters, Swapandeep and Poonam and sister Dalbir Kaur of Sarbjit Singh on Sunday performed prayers (Ardas) at the local Gurdwara.

The family on this occasion said that it wants the Pakistani authorities to look at the case with sympathy, as it’s a case of mistaken identity and claims he is innocent.

The family also has urged the Indian leadership to include Sarbjit’s case on its top agenda while talking to Pakistan.

“It was good to know that the Pakistan Supreme Court would hear his review petition against the death sentence awarded to him for his alleged involvement in three bomb blasts on Monday. Though lot of efforts are being done by the Indian government but we are worried as now Sarbjit is still languishing in Pakistani jail for the last 19 years”, said Dalbir Kaur, sister of Sarbjit Singh.

According to the family of Sarbjit Singh, who has been sentenced to death for alleged involvement in bomb blasts in Lahore, he is a victim of mistaken identity.

He has been convicted of espionage and terrorism and sentenced to death for being a spy for the Indian RAW. He has been accused of masterminding the 1990 bomb blasts in serial bomb blasts in Lahore, Faislabad, and Kasur.

“My father is innocent. I hope that after hearing the review petition of my father, the Pakistan’s Supreme court would release Papa,” said Swapandeep, elder daughter of Sarbjit.

Sarabjit Singh is a resident of Amritsar in Punjab. He was arrested near the Kasur border in Pakistan in August 1990. As per his family, he had actually strayed into Pakistan’s territory in an inebriated state.

Singh was awarded death sentence by a Lahore anti-terrorism court in October 1991 for carrying out serial bomb blasts in Pakistan.

He challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court, however, the apex court quashed his appeal in September 2005, saying that the review petition was not filed within the time period as mentioned in the law. By Ravinder Singh Robin (ANI)

Pak Supreme Court to hear Sarabjeet’s petition on June 22

Islamabad, June 20 (ANI): The Pakistan Supreme Court (SC) would hear the review petitions filed by Manjeet Singh alias Sarabjeet Singh, against the death sentence awarded to him for his alleged involvement in three bomb blasts, on Monday, June 22.

Singh, a resident of Amritsar, was arrested near the Kasur border in Pakistan in August 1990.

Pakistan security agencies said that Singh had admitted that he was sent to Pakistan to carry out serial bomb blasts in Lahore, Faislabad, and Kasur, and was trained by the Indian Army, and the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW).

Singh was awarded the death sentence by a Lahore anti-terrorism court in October 1991.

He challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court, however, the apex court quashed his appeal in September, 2005, saying that the review petition was not filed within the time period as mentioned in the law.

In March 2006, a two member Supreme Court bench dismissed Singh’s petition against his conviction in the Lahore’s Yakki Gate bomb blast in 1990.

Singh has been languishing in Pakistan jails for the last 28 years, as Pakistan has denied setting him free, despite continuous efforts by the Indian diplomatic channels. (ANI)

Pak SC declares Sharif brothers eligible to contest elections

Islamabad, May 26 (ANI): Revoking the Lahore High Court’s verdict to disqualify former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his brother Shahbaz Sharif from contesting elections, the Pakistan Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday declared the Sharif brothers eligible for fighting elections.

The five-member SC bench headed by Justice Tassadaq Hussain Jilani, while hearing the review petitions filed by the Sharifs’ against their disqualification on the conviction in plane hijacking case and default case respectively ordered to lift the ban from them.

Earlier, the apex court had upheld the Lahore High Court’s (LHC) verdict in February after the two consistently refused to appear before the before the PCO judges and SC three-member bench, during hearing of the petitions.

Later, Shahbaz Sharif was removed from the post of Punjab chief minister and governors’ rule was imposed in the province.

Nawaz Sharif, had then called on a nation wide protest march against the verdict and to restore the judiciary including reinstating the deposed chief justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry.

On March 16, following the restoration of the deposed judges, Sharif brothers had filed review petitions in the Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) leaders have hailed the Supreme Court’s verdict.

The PML-N Secretary Information, Ahsan Iqbal said the Supreme Court’s verdict would lead to strengthening the democracy.

Iqbal blamed former President Pervez Musharraf for hatching a conspiracy against the Sharif brothers.

Another PML-N leader, Javed Hashmi termed the SC’s verdict as a victory of justice and truth.

“It is a day of jubilation for the entire nation, and the decision will put the country on the path of progress and prosperity.The judiciary has foiled the conspiracies hatched against the people,” The News quoted Hashmi, as saying. (ANI)

Pakistan Supreme Court grants bail to Red Mosque cleric

Islamabad – Pakistan’s Supreme Court Wednesday granted bail to a radical cleric who incited a standoff with security forces at Islamabad’s Red Mosque and adjoining seminary nearly two years ago, his lawyer said. “The court has observed that there was no evidence against Maulana Abdul Aziz in this case that could prevent his release on bail,” attorney Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui told reporters.

The court ruling followed a petition filed by Aziz challenging the earlier denial of bail by a lower court in a case regarding the illegal occupation of a state-owned library adjacent to the mosque.

Authorities had filed 27 criminal cases against the cleric after he was arrested trying to escape disguised as a burqa-clad woman, shortly before military commandos stormed the Red Mosque to end the standoff with his armed pupils in July 2007.

The “Operation Silence” left more than 100 people dead, including around a dozen security personnel, according to the government.

Aziz has already been granted bail in 25 other cases while charges against him in one case were dropped.

“Maulana Abdul Aziz is expected to be released within two to three days,” Siddiqui said.

The military attack on the Red Mosque sparked a series of suicide attacks across Pakistan. Militant Muslims claim that more than 3,000 female students in the adjoining girls’ seminary also died in the operation. The government denied those allegations.(dpa)

Petition seeking early trial of Musharraf moved in Pak SC

Lahore, Apr 15 (ANI): An application has been moved before the Pakistan Supreme Court (SC) for the early hearing of a petition, seeking the trial of former President Pervez Musharraf under Article 6 of the Constitution.

Advocate Zahid Malik has also sought the court’s directions for the federal government to bar Musharraf from leaving the country.

Malik submitted the constitutional petition was of an urgent nature and it should be taken up at the earliest, the Daily Times reported.

Petitioner’s counsel Dr Farooq Hassan had moved the constitutional petition under Article 184(3) at the Lahore registry of the SC.

Malik said Musharraf had admitted taking an unconstitutional action on November 3, 2007, and that he had subverted the constitution by doing so.

The petitioner sought the court’s direction to the federal government for proceeding against Musharraf in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 read with the high treason act of 1973.

He also pleaded for Musharraf’s trial by a military court under the Pakistan Army Act for violating the provisions in the military law.

Malik requested the court that those who had abetted Musharraf should also be punished in accordance with the law. (ANI)

New US Bill forces Pak to ensure no nefarious activities against India to qualify for aid

Washington, Apr.10 (ANI): The United States has incorporated new conditions for Pakistan that it would not lend support to any group or person conspiring against India, before the Obama Administration gives a green signal to the 1.5 billion dollars assistance to it for the next five years.

The Pakistan aid bill named the Pakistan Enduring Assistance and Cooperation Enhancement or the PEACE Act of 2009, was tabled in the US House of Representatives on April 2.

The Clause ‘J’ of the bill clearly states : ” It requires Pakistan not to support any person or group that conducts violence, sabotage, or other activities meant to instill fear or terror in India.”

Furthermore, the bill states that Pakistan should ensure access of US investigators to individuals suspected of engaging in worldwide proliferation of nuclear materials, and restrict such individuals from travel or any other activity that could result in further proliferation, Dawn reported.

This means, if the bill is passed, the United States would have a direct access to the disgraced Pakistan scientist Dr.A.Q. Khan and his aides who have been charged of secretly providing nuclear technology to Iran, North Korea and Libya.

Khan, however, has been acquitted by Pakistan Supreme Court of all such charges.

The bill also asks Islamabad to redouble its efforts to prevent the presence of the Taliban and its allies in Pakistan that support extremists in Afghanistan.

According to sources the main reason why Washington attached all these condition with the proposed financial aid to Pakistan, is that the United States fears that Pakistan could turn into a safe haven for terrorists armed with atomic weapons.

In the recent past the United States has also clarified that it would not offer a ‘blank cheque’ to Islamabad, and that it would be made accountable for all the help it receives.

The PEACE Act also has mention of improving counterterrorism financing and anti-money laundering laws to comply with international standards for Pakistan. (ANI)

Chaudhry not restored under any deal: Aitzaz Ahsan

Lahore, Apr.9 (ANI): Pakistan Supreme Court Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry was not restored as a result of any deal, former Supreme Court Bar Association president Aitzaz Ahsan said on Thursday.

Addressing the lawyers here, he said that Chaudhry would continue to provide justice to the masses through suo motu notices.

Last month, Chaudhry said that the real judiciary had been restored after a long time and now the dignity of the court and institution would have to be restored. He also said that the judiciary would have to be cleaned of corruption.

Speaking after resuming his duties as Chief Justice, Chaudhry said that irregularities would not be tolerated in dispensing justice.

He added that the stories of corruption from civil judge to Supreme Court were common, and urged upon the lawyers to co-operate with him in stamping out corruption.

Justice Chaudhry further said if there was any complaint of irregularity, then a petition could be filed in the Registrar Office.

He said he was thankful to the people on their struggle for restoration of judiciary. (ANI)

Pak SC rejects Musharraf trial petition

Lahore, Apr.7 (ANI): The Pakistan Supreme Court has returned the trial petition moved against former President General (retired) Pervez Musharraf with several objections.

Supreme Court Registrar Dr Faqir Hussain returned the petition with four major objections.

Dr. Hussain stated that the petitioner Zahid Malik has no locus standi to move the petition, the advocate-on-record did not specify whether the petition was the first of its kind, the petitioner did not avail a lower court first and that the petitioner has sought more than one relief in a single petition, The Daily Times reported.

Malik’s counsel, Dr Farooq Hassan argued that Musharraf had admitted to taking unconstitutional steps by removing Supreme Court Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry in November 2007.

The petition filed by Malik accused General Musharraf of disseminating subversion of the Constitution by appointing the PCO’s after dismissing superior judges including the Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.

The petition also asked for trial of the former President through Courts Martial under Pakistan Army Act for savagely violating the provisions relating to officers of the Army.

It also states that all the persons who assisted General Musharraf to carry out his illegal activities should also be punished according to the law of the country.

The apex court has been requested to bar General Musharraf from moving out of Pakistan.

Malik, in his petition had also tabled the order passed by a seven-member bench of the Supreme Court to suspend operation of the PCO on November 3, 2007, stating that those who acted against this order were liable for the contempt of the court.

The petition further stated that the matter is of high public importance as it involves violation of fundamental rights with respect to access to freedom and independent judiciary enshrined under Articles 9,10, 14, and 26. (ANI)

Pak Supreme Court throws out sedition petition filed against Musharraf

Islamabad, Apr.1 (ANI): The Pakistan Supreme Court has thrown away a sedition petition filed against former President General Pervez Musharraf.

The petition filed by one Zahid Hussain Malik was returned back by the court saying that it was neither the proper forum for the case nor the petitioner was an affected party in it, The News reported.

Advocate on record’s affidavit was also not attached with the petition which particularly irked the court.

The petition filed Malik accused General Musharraf of disseminating subversion of the Constitution by appointing the PCO’s after dismissing superior judges including the Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.

The petition asked for trial of the former President through Courts Martial under Pakistan Army Act for savagely violating the provisions relating to officers of the Army, The Nations reports.

It also stated that all the persons who assisted General Musharraf to carry out his illegal activities should also be punished according to the law of the country. (ANI)