No meddling in India's internal affairs, says US

WASHINGTON: The Obama administration on Wednesday repeated its support for “freedom of expression and assembly” in the context of the Anna Hazare's anti-corruption movement in India while contesting the impression that Washington is interfering in India's internal affairs or seeking to destabilize it in any way.

“All democratic governments have a responsibility to allow peaceful protest and freedom of dissent, even as they work to maintain public safety,” State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said, amid a minor kerfuffle in India's Congress party circles over remarks on the Hazare movement attributed to Washington.

A Congress party spokesman on Tuesday implied the US was going beyond routine expressions of support and interfering with India's internal affairs. “How can we take orders from the United States?” party official Rashid Alvi was quoted as saying, “We don't want any outside interference.”

Alvi's gripe arose from Nuland's remarks last week to the effect that the US supported the right of peaceful, non- v

iolent protest around the world. “That said, India is a democracy, and we count on India to exercise appropriate democratic restraint in the way it deals with peaceful protest,” she added. Nuland suggested that some Indian news outlets had gone overboard on reporting the remarks out of context.

On Wednesday, she repeated the remarks, stressing even more that “India is a country that has a strong and long-established democratic tradition” and “It's a country that people look to for these issues, and it has a long tradition of nonviolent protest.”

“It's widely admired for these things and open debate, and that's the standard that we all have come to expect from India,” she added.

The Obama administration has been pilloried for its weak support to the Arab spring movement even as it seeks to address the growing domestic economic unrest and inequity.

As a matter of policy, Washington is extremely circumspect in addressing internal developments in India, deferring frequently to the country's flourishing democracy and strong institutions.

zp8497586rq

Kimberley gas fight ‘divisive’

The Kimberley Land Council says a fight over the development of a gas industry in the region, in northern Western Australia, has become divisive and nasty.

The land council and environmental groups are at loggerheads over a proposal to set up a liquefied natural gas hub at James Price Point.

The council’s executive director, Wayne Bergmann, says the local office had been vandalised with graffiti and Indigenous families were now fighting over the issue.

He called on environmentalists to take a step back.

He says Aboriginal traditional owners have a right to develop a gas industry on their land.

“It is great to have an open debate, but not a manipulative one and a divisive one that has no justification or basis,” Mr Bergmann said.

“The Aboriginal people have a right to make an informed decision about balancing their environmental and cultural values and determining the future that they want to create and the opportunities that they want to create for their children and their grandchildren.”

Mr Bergmann says Aboriginal people have been balancing the environment and its resources for thousands of years.

“We have a right to make decisions about how our country is used, how to balance the resources,” he said.

“We have ingrained into us a responsibility to look after the country and we haven’t given up on that.

“I am calling on the leaders of the environment movements. We want them to work with us, rather than against us.”

The Wilderness Society said it proudly campaigned against projects that threaten pristine habitats and valuable species.

The Wilderness Society spokesman, Peter Robertson said the large gas hub proposal would ruin the breeding and feeding grounds of humpback whales, dugongs and turtles.

“The Kimberley marine and coastal environment has been recognised globally as one of the least impacted and most pristine marine and coastal environments left on the whole of planet earth,” Mr Roberston said.

“The proposal to impose a massive, polluting destructive LNG gas facility on that coast is absolutely ridiculous.”

Aboriginal leaders said environmental groups were hijacking developments that would help improve the lives of indigenous people in Northern Australia.

Speaking at a conference in Darwin, Cape York leader Richard Ah Mat said the developments have the approval of Traditional Owners, and other groups had no right to interfere.

“Our future prospects as a people are severely shackled while we spend needless energy fighting to protect our legitimate rights over the management protection land use and development of our lands,” Mr Ah Mat said.

“If we don’t win, the fight we will collectively be condemned to a tragic life of generational welfare dependency.”

British troops far from defeating Taliban, says Brit Defence Secretary

London, Sep.16 (ANI): British troops are a long way from winning the battle against a resilient Taliban in Afghanistan, and the conflict in the country could lead to “major shifts” in military spending, said British Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth.

“We are facing a resilient enemy which we are far from succeeding against yet,” he told an audience of defence experts at King’s College London.

“I reject the proposition we are not making progress. I also reject the proposition a reduced military presence will lead to less Taliban success,” The Telegraph quoted Ainsworth, as saying further.

A leading thinktank warned earlier that the presence of large numbers of foreign troops in Afghanistan made it harder to achieve a political settlement to the conflict.

The International Institute for Strategic Studies said western forces in Afghanistan needed a “more cunning” strategy if they were to achieve their aims.

Ainsworth said a military failure in Afghanistan would have “profound consequences for our national security” and “undermine the Nato alliance”.

He also called for an open debate about future defence policy and how money for the military should be spent before the government publishes a defence review green paper in advance of next year’s general election. (ANI)

Pak Minister Malik invites Chidambaram for an open debate on 26/11

Islamabad, Sep.11 (ANI): Pakistan’s Interior Minister Rehman Malik has invited his Indian counterpart P Chidambaram to an open debate on investigations into the 26/11 terror attacks.

Addressing a press conference here, Malik said Pakistan was sincere in the investigations into the Mumbai attacks, adding that it had filed the charge sheet in the court within 76 days, whereas the Indians took more than 90 days to prepare the charge sheet.

Malik said he is ready for the debate anywhere India, Pakistan or wherever Chidambaram likes.

Malik acknowledged receiving the six Indian dossiers, but added that New Delhi appeared to be confused about who was the mastermind behind 26/11 — Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi or Hafiz Saeed.

Rehman’s open debate challenge to Chidambaram came as the latter met US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Washington and reportedly briefed her about Pakistan’s inaction against the perpetrators of the Mumbai terror attacks

Chidambaram, who wraps up his four-day visit to the United States today, told Clinton that Pakistan simply has not taken any action against the perpetrators of 26/11, and its mastermind Hafiz Saeed.

Chidambaram also told US officials that infiltration from Pakistan has increased since May this year.

Drawing disparity between India and Pakistan’s approach to the investigations, he said, “I think the US understands the difference between the way India has approached the post 26/11 situation and the way Pakistan has approached the post 26/11 situation. I think it is enough to draw attention to the difference and leave it there.”

On the resumption of talks between India and Pakistan, Chidambaram said: “I think India’s position has been made clear by the Prime Minister in parliament and there is no need for me to add anything to it or clarify.” (ANI)

Different strokes for votes

One wants to begin a talk show on the lines of Oprah Winfrey and the other advocates filtering out and selecting the best candidate, as is done in the US presidential election. Ashima Khanna (35) and Major Sangeeta Tomar (40), made it to the short-list of Youth For Equality – an organisation opposed to caste-based reservation and making its debut into politics.

Thirty-three-year-old Girish Kumar Singh was the third name announced by the YFE as probable candidates for the New Delhi constituency. “In the US, they have open debates on national issues and people judge the best candidate.

But in India, nothing is transparent. We want to set an example by letting the people decide who they want to vote for,” said Tomar.

The mother of two was encouraged by her father to join the YFE movement. “He was reading the paper and told me about the ideology of the YFE. I was attracted to the fact that they talked of equality for all,” said Tomar, who was the first batch of commissioned lady officers and did her training from Officers Training Academy, Madras.

Khanna belongs to the Professionals Party of India and is a product of Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Ramesh Nagar. “Indians need to talk and come out with solutions.

We need to bring out the best in our people,” said Khanna. “We need to give the marginalised the education and confidence to speak, not handicap them with reservation,” she said.

The YFE had called for online applications from interested candidates and received 223 resumes. “We rejected 117 applicants as they were below 25 years,” said Kaushal Mishra, president, YFE. “Out of 53 candidates, a core committee has short-listed three,” Mishra said.

The three candidates will now fight it out during an open debate to be held on Tuesday. “The debate will be open to the public and judged by a panel of experts,” said Mishra.

Mallika Sarabhai invites Advani for open debate

Ahmedabad, April 6 (IANS) Noted danseuse Mallika Sarabhai Monday invited Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) prime ministerial candidate L.K. Advani for a public debate on his achievements during his last four terms as the MP from the Gandhinagar Lok Sabha seat in Gujarat.

‘I invite the senior BJP leader for an open debate on his achievements in his constituency even though he had not learnt to converse in Gujarati after being elected from Gandhinagar for so many terms as MP,’ Sarabhai told reporters at a press conference here Monday evening.

Sarabhai said that she would be putting up five questions every week for Advani to answer till the campaigning gets over in Gujarat.

She said that there are residents of villages in Gandhinagar district whose homes do not have a toilet for the past six decades. An amount of Rs.2 crore had only been utilised by Advani for carrying out developmental work and a total of Rs.8 crore had been returned by him to the central government unutilised during his last four terms as MP, she said.

‘In the Sanand taluka which comes under the Gandhinagar constituency, a number of the residents in the villages still do not have voter cards,’ Sarabhai said.

‘In the muslim dominated Juhapura locality, which comes under the Gandhinagar constituency, only 75,000 of the 3.75 lakh population has voter cards,’ she said.

Referring to the suggestion made by Advani to formulate a law for bringing back black money stashed abroad by Indian nationals, she said that Advani needs to clarify whose black money had been stashed abroad.

‘Is it industrialists or politicians. The BJP leader should come out with the list of names of the individuals whose black money had been stashed in banks abroad,’ Sarabhai said.