RPT-NZ Oil and Gas says Kupe reserves increased

July 14 (Reuters) – Explorer New Zealand Oil and Gas said on Wednesday the estimated reserves of the Kupe oil and gas field, in which it has a 15 percent stake, have been increased.

The oil and gas explorer said its share of the additional reserves has a sales value of nearly NZ$100 million ($71 million).

The review showed gas reserves increased by 8 percent, LPG reserves were higher by 5 percent and light oil reserves were up by 27 percent.

Shares in New Zealand Oil and Gas (NZO.NZ) last traded up 1.6 percent at NZ$1.29, having fallen around 23.2 percent so far this year, compared with a 6.3 percent fall in the benchmark top 50 .NZ50 index.

The Kupe field is 50 percent owned by Origin (ORG.AX), with state-owned power company Genesis Energy holding 31 percent, NZ Oil and Gas 15 percent, and Mitsui E&P Ltd 4 percent. ($1=NZ$1.39)

NZ Oil and Gas says Kupe reserves increased

July 14 (Reuters) – Explorer New Zealand Oil and Gas said on Wednesday the estimated reserves of the Kupe oil and gas field, in which it has a 15 percent stake, have been increased.

The oil and gas explorer said its share of the additional reserves has a sales value of nearly NZ$100 million ($71 million).

The review showed gas reserves increased by 8 percent, LPG reserves were higher by 5 percent and light oil reserves were up by 27 percent.

Shares in New Zealand Oil and Gas (NZO.NZ) last traded up 1.6 percent at NZ$1.29, having fallen around 23.2 percent so far this year, compared with a 6.3 percent fall in the benchmark top 50 .NZ50 index.

The Kupe field is 50 percent owned by Origin (ORG.AX), with state-owned power company Genesis Energy holding 31 percent, NZ Oil and Gas 15 percent, and Mitsui E&P Ltd 4 percent. ($1=NZ$1.39)

Assam Reminds Canoro Shareholders of Risks Associated With Proposed Transactions With Mass

TORONTO, ONTARIO, May 31 (MARKET WIRE) —
Assam Company India Limited (Assam) today reminds shareholders of Canoro
Resources Ltd. (Canoro) that the previously announced transactions
(Transactions) between Canoro and Mass Financial Corp. (Mass), are
subject to a recent decision of the High Court of Delhi in India (High
Court), which could have material adverse effects on Canoro and
shareholders.

The High Court has issued an order declaring that the Transactions,
including the previously completed private placement with Mass, will be
subject to the final outcome of the Petition by directing that “lis
pendens will apply to the proceedings” (Court Order). Assam has
written to the TSX Venture Exchange and Alberta Securities Commission
regarding Canoro’s failure to comply with its disclosure obligations and
alert Canoro shareholders of the considerable risk, among others, that
the High Court could order the Transactions to be unwound, that shares
issued by Canoro as part of the Transactions could be subject to such
orders or that Canoro may be required to pay substantial damages to Assam.

Basis for the Petition to the High Court of Delhi

Assam asserts in the Petition that completion of the Transactions
violates the requirements of the Production Sharing Contract dated
February 23, 2001 (PSC) between Canoro, Assam and The Government of India
(Government) and the Joint Operating Agreement between Canoro and Assam
dated May 5, 2004 (JOA).

Under the PSC, Government approval is required by Canoro prior to the
entering of the Transactions. Without the consent of the Government,
which to Assam’s knowledge has neither been requested by Canoro nor
given, the Government could terminate the PSC relating to Canoro’s oil
and gas properties in India, which would be materially prejudicial to
Canoro, its shareholders and Assam.

Under the JOA, if Canoro wishes to sell or assign/transfer its interest
in the Amguri oil field, Canoro is required to give notice to Assam so
that Assam is able to exercise its pre-emptive right to purchase the
participating interest of Canoro. No such notice has been given to Assam
by Canoro. The JOA also states that Assam’s pre-emptive right would
extend to “any sale or assignment of the stock” of Canoro
(other than to an affiliate) where Canoro’s Participating Interest under
the JOA in the Amguri oil field is Canoro’s sole or principal asset at
the time of the sale or assignment. The Amguri oil field is Canoro’s sole
producing asset at this time. Assam contends in the Petition that the JOA
requires that Canoro give prior notice to Assam of the Transactions and
permit it to exercise its pre-emptive right in respect of the
Transactions.

Canoro filed its Short Form Prospectus dated May 21, 2010 in connection
with a rights offering of common shares as one step in the Transactions.
However, in light of the above, Assam believes that the disclosures made
by Canoro in its Prospectus in relation to the Court Order are not
complete, accurate or sufficiently objective to enable Canoro’s
shareholders to assess the potential risks in respect of the
Transactions. Assam believes Canoro has not fully disclosed to
shareholders, in a fair and transparent manner, the potential risk that
the High Court could order that the Transactions be unwound, that shares
issued pursuant to the rights offering could be subject to such an order
or that Assam could be awarded substantial damages against Canoro.
Shareholders should expect accurate and balanced disclosure of the
existing facts and their implications in order to make an informed
decision.

Assam Offer for Canoro

Assam also confirms that on April 20, 2010 it provided the Board of
Directors of Canoro with a non-binding proposal for Assam to make a
supported take-over bid for all of the issued and outstanding common
shares of Canoro at $0.21 per common share, a per share price that far
exceeds the consideration offered by Mass under the Investment Agreement,
subject to certain terms and conditions including due diligence access.
This proposal was sent following a number of attempts to engage Canoro’s
Board of Directors in discussions regarding a possible strategic
investment in Canoro. To date, Canoro has not responded to Assam’s offer
so as to advance its current proposal or any other potentially superior
transactions, to the ones being considered with Mass, including a private
placement.

Notwithstanding Assam’s attempts to engage Canoro in discussions and
notwithstanding the contractual impediments and implications of
proceeding with the Transactions, on April 19, 2010 Canoro announced a
private placement, underwritten rights offering and convertible debt
transaction with Mass including a standby commitment by Mass to back-stop
the discounted rights offering and significant changes to the composition
of the Canoro Board to allow Mass’s nominees on the Board. The combined
result of the Transactions is likely to be the transfer of
“control” of Canoro to Mass at a discounted value. Canoro’s
Board of Directors has consented to the Transactions without giving
Canoro’s shareholders an opportunity to consider a transaction that would
provide superior value to both Canoro and its shareholders and without
adequate disclosure regarding the required approvals and consents to be
obtained from the Government of India and from Assam before Canoro may
sell or assign its interest in the Amguri oil field under the PSC and the
JOA and the risks associated with not obtaining such approval/consents.
This is not in the best interests of Canoro or its shareholders.

Canoro and its shareholders have witnessed Canoro’s share price steadily
decline over the past 12 months. Shareholders are now expected to believe
that the existing Board and senior management team of Canoro, who have
presided over this dramatic decline in shareholder value, will be able to
change the operation and value of Canoro. The Amguri oil field is an
asset controlled by the Government of India under the PSC. The Government
of India, the PSC, the JOA, the Amguri oil field itself and, therefore,
Canoro’s interest in the Amguri oil field under the PSC and the JOA are
all subject to the jurisdiction of the Indian courts. Given the potential
risk that the High Court could order that the Transactions be unwound or
that Canoro may be liable for damages in the petition filed by Assam
against Canoro, Assam urges shareholders of Canoro to insist that Canoro
adjourn the shareholders meeting to be held on 9 June 2010 pending the
outcome of the court challenge in India or receipt of Government of India
approval of the Transactions by Canoro.

About Assam

Assam Company India Limited holds a number of companies engaged in tea
plantation operations, oil & gas exploration and infrastructure
development. Assam Company is one of a handful of heritage companies in
India that have been involved in the aforementioned industries for over
170 years.

Contacts:
Kingsdale Communications
Joel Shaffer
416-867-2327

Copyright 2010, Market Wire, All rights reserved.

Spanish stocks – Factors to watch on Monday

MADRID, April 12 (Reuters) – The following Spanish stocks may be affected by newspaper reports and other factors on Monday. Reuters has not verified the newspaper reports, and cannot vouch for their accuracy:

Energy

TELEFONICA (TEF.MC)

Spain’s Telefonica is expected to bid in Germany’s mobile phone spectrum auction on Monday. Analysts have said other bidders include T-Mobile (DTEGn.DE), Vodafone (VOD.L) and E-Plus (KPN.AS). [ID:nLDE6370XS]

REPSOL YPF (REP.MC)

Spain’s Repsol YPF and Italy’s Eni (ENI.MI) are set to announce that a Venezuelan oil field struck eight months ago has 30 percent more natural gas than original estimates suggested, the FT reported on Monday. [nLDE63B00U]

ACCIONA (ANA.MC)

Spain’s Acciona was awarded on Friday a $769 million joint venture road contract with Canada’s SNC-Lavalin (SNC.TO). [ID:nWNAB7487]

For today’s European market outlook double click on [.EU].

For real-time moves on the Spanish blue-chip index IBEX please double click on .IBEX

For IBEX constituent stocks highlight .IBEX in the command box and press the F3 button on your keyboard

For latest news on Spanish stock moves double click [HOT-ES]

For Spanish language market report double click on [.MES]

For latest Eurostocks report please double click on [.EU]

Spanish stocks – Factors to watch on Monday

MADRID, April 12 (Reuters) – The following Spanish stocks may be affected by newspaper reports and other factors on Monday. Reuters has not verified the newspaper reports, and cannot vouch for their accuracy:

Energy

TELEFONICA (TEF.MC)

Spain’s Telefonica is expected to bid in Germany’s mobile phone spectrum auction on Monday. Analysts have said other bidders include T-Mobile (DTEGn.DE), Vodafone (VOD.L) and E-Plus (KPN.AS). [ID:nLDE6370XS]

REPSOL YPF (REP.MC)

Spain’s Repsol YPF and Italy’s Eni (ENI.MI) are set to announce that a Venezuelan oil field struck eight months ago has 30 percent more natural gas than original estimates suggested, the FT reported on Monday. [nLDE63B00U]

ACCIONA (ANA.MC)

Spain’s Acciona was awarded on Friday a $769 million joint venture road contract with Canada’s SNC-Lavalin (SNC.TO). [ID:nWNAB7487]

For today’s European market outlook double click on [.EU].

For real-time moves on the Spanish blue-chip index IBEX please double click on .IBEX

For IBEX constituent stocks highlight .IBEX in the command box and press the F3 button on your keyboard

For latest news on Spanish stock moves double click [HOT-ES]

For Spanish language market report double click on [.MES]

For latest Eurostocks report please double click on [.EU]

Oil wells fail company’s own safety standards

The company that owns the oil well that leaked into the Timor Sea last year says none of the other wells it owns in the oil field comply with its own safety standards.

The well is located in the Montara field off the north-west coast of Western Australia.

From August last year, it leaked thousands of barrels of oil and gas into the Timor Sea each day for 10 weeks, causing Australia’s third largest oil spill.

Andy Jacobs is the Chief Operating Officer of PTTEP Australasia, the Thai-based company that owns the well.

He is the most senior representative from the company to give evidence at the Federal inquiry into the incident.

The inquiry has previously heard the blowout was caused by poor decisions made while the well was being temporarily suspended in the months before the accident.

Now Mr Jacobs has told the inquiry not one of the five wells PTTEP own has been suspended the way it should be, according to the company’s own safety guidelines.

Mr Jacobs also admitted two managers did not do their jobs when it came to reviewing important information about the well’s construction.

The inquiry has heard that the well’s cementing was significantly weaker than it should have been and that that was one of the underlying causes of the blowout.

But Mr Jacobs said the two senior managers, who were based at the company’s Perth office, had all the information they needed to realise there was a problem with the cementing of the well.

PTTEP keeps secret its own report into spill

The company that owns the oil well that leaked into the Timor Sea for 10 weeks last year has refused to show the Federal Inquiry investigating the incident its own internal report into what happened.

In August last year a blowout at a well in the Montara oil field caused Australia’s third largest oil spill.

The well was owned by the Thai-based company, PTTEP Australasia.

Their chief operating officer Andy Jacob has been observing the federal inquiry into the incident over the last few weeks and late yesterday took the stand to give evidence.

He said he had been observing proceedings to ensure the inquiry was given accurate information about what happened and to help PTTEP learn from the accident.

But, the inquiry then heard PTTEP’s corporate lawyers had claimed legal professional privilege over the company’s internal report into the oil spill.

Counsel assisting the inquiry said PTTEP could make the report public and they were acting to protect themselves from legal action.

Ignored

It was also revealed at the federal inquiry that PTTEP ignored construction recommendations from engineers in order to cut costs.

The inquiry heard an engineering company contracted to help build the well quit the project because of safety concerns.

Craig Duncan from PTTEP told the inquiry he disagreed with recommendations from the company, AWT, that had been subcontracted to help build the well.

AWT sent an email to PTTEP saying they were concerned about their recommendations being rejected with little technical justification other than cost and that this was increasing the well’s risk profile.

Mr Duncan told the inquiry he did not think the extra preparations being recommended were worth it.

Company under scrutiny over oil disaster

A federal inquiry into a large oil spill off the Western Australian coast has heard it is fortunate no human lives were lost in the incident.

In his opening statement, counsel assisting the inquiry, Tom Howe QC, says the blowout of oil and gas from the well in the Montara oil field could have had potential catastrophic consequences and it is lucky no-one died.

Oil and gas from the well began leaking into the Timor Sea last August, causing thousands of barrels of oil and gas to spill into the ocean off the Kimberley coast.

The leak, which continued for more than 10 weeks, was eventually stopped when heavy mud was pumped down a relief well.

Mr Howe says there was a number of potential reasons for the blowout.

He says the owner of the well, Thai-based company PTTEP Australasia, did not install one of the pressure caps usually required in a well.

Mr Howe says no-one has been able to provide a satisfactory explanation as to why there was no pressure cap. He also says it appears an incorrect volume of cement was used in the well’s casing shoe.

Andrew Berger, who is also a counsel assisting the inquiry, says the Northern Territory is responsible for the well’s oversight.

He questions whether the NT’s Department of Resources failed to follow good regulatory practice and he says in one instance, the use of a pressure cap instead of a cement plug was approved in precisely 30 minutes.

The inquiry will examine the causes of the oil spill and how it was managed.

Mariner Energy Reports 2009 Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year Results and Announces Additional Drilling Success in the Gulf

HOUSTON, TX, Mar 01 (MARKET WIRE) —
Mariner Energy, Inc. (NYSE: ME) today reported fiscal fourth-quarter and
full-year 2009 financial and operating results. For the three months
ended December 31, 2009, the company reported net income of $83.3 million
or $0.83 per basic and $0.82 per diluted share, compared with a loss of
$648.9 million or $7.41 per basic and diluted share for the same period
in the prior year. For the full year ended December 31, 2009, the company
reported a net loss of $319.4 million ($3.34 per basic and diluted
share). This compares to a net loss of $388.7 million ($4.44 per basic
and diluted share) for 2008. Excluding a non-recurring, non-cash gain and
certain non-cash charges, the company’s adjusted net income for fourth
quarter 2009 was $21.0 million or $0.22 per basic and diluted share, and
for full-year 2009 adjusted net income was $92.2 million or $0.96 per
basic and diluted share. Operating cash flow was $531.1 million for 2009.
See the notes below for reconciliation of non-GAAP measures adjusted net
income and operating cash flow.

Highlights for 2009 and first quarter 2010 to date include:

– First quarter 2010 discoveries at Mandy, a deepwater oil field on
Mississippi Canyon Block 199, and on South Pass 75, a gas field on the
shelf, as well as the previously announced success at the Lucius
sidetrack well on Keathley Canyon Block 875.
– A 2009 drilling success rate of 63% (10 for 16) offshore, including
the Heidelberg and Lucius oil fields in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico
and the discovery and appraisal onshore of a new oil field at Deadwood
in the Permian Basin.
– Expanding into a new core area in the Gulf Coast with the acquisition
of producing properties located principally in South Texas.
– Building a new leasehold position in unconventional resource plays,
including approximately 43,000 net acres in Wyoming, North Dakota
and Arkansas principally targeting low-entry-cost oil opportunities.
– A 12% increase in 2009 year-end estimated proved reserves to 1.087
trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent (Tcfe), a reserve
replacement rate from all sources of 190% at a cost of $3.24 per
thousand cubic feet equivalent (Mcfe) (see related notes below), and
a year-over-year production increase of 7% to 126.5 billion cubic feet
of natural gas equivalent (Bcfe).

“Mariner Energy continues to create and build value, our primary
focus. Consistent with our business plan, we expanded onshore into new
areas, conventional and unconventional, that should provide predictable
and repeatable results going forward, while tapping the significant upside
potential in our offshore exploration portfolio, principally in the
deepwater. We’ve had another successful year with the drillbit in all
areas and realized continued success in the prolific deepwater subsalt
play. For the sixth year in a row, we increased our estimated proved oil
and gas reserves, which now approach 1.1 Tcfe, a milestone for our
company. The increase occurred without a material increase in the
percentage of our proved undeveloped reserves. Our proved reserves do not
yet reflect any contribution from a number of our deepwater discoveries,
including the significant Heidelberg and Lucius discoveries as well as
Bushwood, Wide Berth and Dalmatian and include only relatively small
amounts from Balboa, Smoothie and the Deadwood field in the Permian
Basin. These unbooked projects should significantly enhance reserves and
production in future years. More than half of our proved reserves now are
onshore. Additionally, almost half of our proved reserves are oil and
liquids; and we have evolved into an oil company, especially when the
unbooked discoveries, comprised largely of oil and liquids, are
considered. Our excellent operational success in 2009 and early 2010
again validates our balanced business model,” said Scott D. Josey,
Mariner’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President.

NON-CASH GAIN AND CHARGES

The company’s results for fourth-quarter and full-year 2009 reflect a
non-recurring, non-cash gain of $107.3 million attributable to the
December 31, 2009 acquisition of the subsidiaries and operations of Edge
Petroleum Corporation. Based on lower average commodity prices for 2009,
Mariner recorded full cost ceiling test impairments of its proved oil and
gas properties in the amount of $754.3 million for full-year 2009 and
$49.6 million for fourth quarter 2009. The company also recorded a
non-recurring, non-cash charge of $12.0 million at year-end 2009 related
to a contingent OIL withdrawal premium. Stock compensation expense of
$25.4 million was recorded for the full-year 2009, which includes $7.1
million for the fourth-quarter. These items are detailed below in the
reconciliation of adjusted net income, a non-GAAP measure.

FOURTH QUARTER 2009 RESULTS

For fourth quarter 2009, Mariner reported net income of $83.3 million, or
$0.83 per basic and $0.82 per diluted share, which reflects the non-cash
gain and charges noted above. This compares with a net loss of $648.9
million or $7.41 per basic and diluted share for the same three-month
period in the prior year. Adjusted net income, which excludes the non-cash
gain and charges, was $21.0 million for fourth quarter 2009, or $0.22 per
share (see reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure below).

Net production for fourth quarter 2009 was 30.8 Bcfe, compared with 23.5
Bcfe for fourth quarter 2008. Total natural gas production net to Mariner
for fourth quarter 2009 was 20.8 billion cubic feet (Bcf), compared with
16.1 Bcf for the same period in the prior year. Total oil net production
for fourth quarter 2009 was 1.2 million barrels (MMBbls), compared with
1.0 MMBbls for the same period in 2008. Natural gas liquids net
production for fourth quarter 2009 was 0.4 MMBbls, compared with 0.3
MMBbls for fourth quarter 2008. Mariner has begun posting its estimated
monthly production volumes on its website (www.mariner-energy.com) on the
last business day of the month following the applicable reporting period.
The first such report, disclosing January 2010 estimated production, was
posted on February 26, 2010.

For fourth quarter 2009, Mariner’s average realized natural gas price was
$6.08 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) compared with $7.44 per Mcf for the
same period in 2008. Mariner’s average realized oil price was $77.96 per
barrel (Bbl) for fourth quarter 2009, compared with $65.29 per Bbl for
fourth quarter 2008. These average realized prices reflect settlements
during the period under Mariner’s hedging program. The average realized
NGL price was $41.49 per Bbl for fourth quarter 2009, compared with $26.63
per Bbl for the same period in 2008.

FULL-YEAR 2009 RESULTS

For the year ended December 31, 2009, Mariner reported a net loss of
$319.4 million, which equates to a loss of $3.34 per basic and diluted
share. For 2008, Mariner reported a net loss of $388.7 million, or $4.44
per basic and diluted share. Adjusted net income, which excludes the
non-cash gain and charges noted above, was $92.2 million for 2009 or
$0.96 per basic and diluted share (see reconciliation of this non-GAAP
measure below).

For the full-year 2009, Mariner reported net production of 126.5 Bcfe, up
from 118.4 Bcfe reported in 2008. Daily production averaged more than
347.0 million cubic feet of natural gas equivalent (MMcfe), a record for
Mariner. Total natural gas net production during 2009 was 90.8 Bcf at an
average realized price of $6.08 per Mcf, compared with 79.8 Bcf for 2008
at an average realized price of $9.31 per Mcf. Total oil net production
for 2009 was 4.5 MMBbls at an average realized price of $70.59 per Bbl,
compared to 4.9 MMBbls during 2008 at an average realized price of $86.02
per Bbl. These average realized prices reflect settlements during the
period under Mariner’s hedging program. Total NGL net production during
2009 was 1.5 MMBbls at an average realized price of $33.10, compared to
1.6 MMBbls at an average realized price of $55.02 per Bbl for the prior
year.

Operating cash flow was $531.1 million for the full 2009 fiscal year,
compared with $885.9 million in 2008 (see reconciliation of this non-GAAP
measure below).

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

Mariner’s capital expenditures for the fourth-quarter and full-year 2009
are summarized in the table below.

Fourth Full-
Quarter Year
2009 2009
——— ———
(In thousands)
Exploration $ 39,006 $ 204,805

Development
Gulf of Mexico – Deepwater $ 2,170 $ 67,538
Gulf of Mexico – Shelf 31,153 179,973
Permian Basin 22,621 59,323

Acquisitions $ 239,517 $ 236,661

Corporate expenditures and other $ 696 $ 38,462

——— ———
Total Capital Expenditures $ 335,163 $ 786,762
========= =========

OPERATIONAL UPDATE

Offshore

Mariner was successful in 10 of its 16 offshore wells drilled in 2009.
Mariner drilled five offshore wells in fourth quarter 2009, four of which
were successful:

Working Water Depth
Well Name Operator Interest (Ft) Location
——– ——— ———— ———————-
Green Canyon 490#1
(Wide Berth) Mariner 56.25% 3,700 Conventional Deepwater
South Marsh
Island 10 #4 Mariner 100% 70 Conventional Shelf
Keathley Canyon
875#1 (Lucius) Anadarko 16.67% 7,100 Deepwater Subsalt
Viosca Knoll
917#1ST2
(Swordfish) Noble 15% 4,370 Conventional Deepwater

The unsuccessful well during the fourth quarter was South Marsh
Island 150 D1ST1.

Subsequent to the end of fourth quarter 2009, Mariner drilled five wells,
all of which were successful:

Working Water Depth
Well Name Operator Interest (Ft) Location
——– ——– ———– ———————-
Keathley Canyon
875#1ST1 (Lucius) Anadarko 16.67% 7,100 Deepwater Subsalt
Mississippi
Canyon 199#1
(Mandy) LLOG 35% 2,500 Conventional Deepwater
Mississippi Canyon
199#2 (Mandy) LLOG 35% 2,500 Conventional Deepwater
South Pass 75
A6ST1 Apache 28.8% 356 Conventional Shelf
South Pass 75 A11
ST2 Apache 28.8% 356 Conventional Shelf

Mariner currently has three rigs working in the Gulf of Mexico.

Onshore

In fourth quarter 2009, Mariner drilled 25 wells in the Permian Basin, of
which 21 were successful. The non-commercial wells were shallow gas
targets drilled at the company’s Homestake prospect in Edwards County,
Texas. Mariner currently has six rigs working on its Permian Basin
properties. The company participated in 51 onshore wells in 2009.

CONFERENCE CALL TO DISCUSS RESULTS

A conference call has been scheduled for 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time (9:30
a.m. Central Time) on Monday, March 1, 2010, to discuss fiscal 2009
financial and operating results.

To participate in the call, please dial one of the numbers listed below at
least 10 minutes prior to the scheduled start time:

Callers from the United States and Canada: +1 (866) 202-0886
Callers from International locations: +1 (617) 213-8841

The conference passcode for both numbers is 8460 0122.

The call also will be webcast live over the Internet and can be accessed
through the Investor Information section of Mariner’s website at
http://www.mariner-energy.com. Speakers may refer to data in the company’s
latest investor presentation, which is accessible on the company’s website
under “Investor Information,” then clicking “Webcasts and Presentations.”

A telephonic replay of the call will be available through March 11, 2010
by dialing (888) 286-8010 or (617) 801-6888, pass code 7201 1598. An
archive of the webcast will be available shortly after the call on
Mariner’s website through March 31, 2010.

About Mariner Energy, Inc.

Mariner Energy is an independent oil and gas exploration, development, and
production company headquartered in Houston, Texas, with principal
operations in the Permian Basin, Gulf Coast and Gulf of Mexico. For more
information about Mariner, visit the company’s website
at
www.mariner-energy.com.

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
SELECTED OPERATING DATA
(Unaudited)

Net Production, Realized Prices and Operating
Costs
Three Months Twelve Months
Ended Ended
December 31, December 31,
2009 2008 2009 2008
—— ——- ——- ——-

Net production:
Natural gas (Bcf) 20.8 16.1 90.8 79.8
Oil (MMBbls) 1.2 1.0 4.5 4.9
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls) 0.4 0.3 1.5 1.6
Total production (Bcfe) 30.8 23.5 126.5 118.4

Realized prices (net of hedging):
Natural gas ($/Mcf) $ 6.08 $ 7.44 $ 6.08 $ 9.31
Oil ($/Bbl) 77.96 65.29 70.59 86.02
Natural gas liquids ($/Bbl) 41.49 26.63 33.10 55.02

Operating costs per Mcfe:
Lease operating expense $ 2.72 $ 2.73 $ 1.97 $ 1.96
Severance and ad valorem taxes 0.09 0.15 0.11 0.15
Transportation expense 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.13
General and administrative expense 0.73 1.03 0.63 0.51
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 3.18 3.91 3.16 3.95
Other expense (0.12) 0.09 0.07 0.03

Estimated Proved Reserves

As of the Year As of the Year
Ended Ended
December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
—————– —————–
Estimated proved natural gas, oil and
natural gas liquids reserves:
Natural gas (Bcf) 571.4 558.0
Oil (MMBbls) 52.5 43.8
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls) 33.5 25.5
—————– —————–
Total estimated proved reserves
(Bcfe) 1,087.1 973.9
—————– —————–
Total proved developed reserves
(Bcfe) 716.4 677.7
—————– —————–

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)

Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
December 31, December 31,
———————- ———————-
2009 2008 2009 2008
———- ———- ———- ———-
Revenues:
Natural gas sales $ 126,512 $ 119,665 $ 552,259 $ 742,370
Oil sales 94,855 63,721 315,642 419,878
Natural gas liquids sales 18,523 7,136 48,921 85,715
Other revenues 399 46,746 26,119 52,544
———- ———- ———- ———-
Total revenues 240,289 237,268 942,941 1,300,507
Cost and Expenses:
Lease operating expense 83,633 64,304 249,449 231,645
Severance and ad valorem
taxes 2,742 3,505 14,410 18,191
Transportation expense 4,867 3,708 18,494 14,996
General and
administrative expense 22,505 24,333 79,960 60,613
Depreciation, depletion
and amortization 98,095 92,095 399,400 467,265
Full cost ceiling test
impairment 49,594 575,607 754,325 575,607
Goodwill impairment – 295,598 – 295,598
Other property impairment – 15,252 – 15,252
Other miscellaneous
expense (3,654) 2,087 8,306 3,052
———- ———- ———- ———-
Total costs and
expenses 257,782 1,076,489 1,524,344 1,682,219
———- ———- ———- ———-
OPERATING LOSS (17,493) (839,221) (581,403) (381,712)

Other Income/(Expenses):
Interest income 56 386 499 1,362
Interest expense, net of
capitalized amounts (19,058) (2,757) (70,134) (56,398)
Gain on acquisition 107,259 – 107,259 -
———- ———- ———- ———-
Income (loss) before taxes 70,764 (841,592) (543,779) (436,748)
Benefit for income taxes 12,510 192,672 224,370 48,223
———- ———- ———- ———-
Net income (loss) 83,274 (648,920) (319,409) (388,525)
Less: net income
attributable to
non-controlling
interest – – – (188)
———- ———- ———- ———-
Net Income (Loss)
Attributable to Mariner $ 83,274 $ (648,920) $ (319,409) $ (388,713)
========== ========== ========== ==========

Earnings per share:
Net income (loss) per
Share – basic $ 0.83 $ (7.41) $ (3.34) $ (4.44)
Net income (loss) per
Share – diluted $ 0.82 $ (7.41) $ (3.34) $ (4.44)

Weighted average shares
Outstanding – basic 100,826 87,623 95,607 87,491
Weighted average shares
Outstanding – diluted 101,406 87,623 95,607 87,491

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)

December 31, December 31,
2009 2008
———– ———–
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 8,919 $ 3,251
Receivables, net of allowances 148,725 219,920
Insurance receivables 8,452 13,123
Derivative financial instruments 2,239 121,929
Intangible assets 22,615 2,353
Prepaid expenses and other 11,667 14,377
Deferred income tax 9,704 -
———– ———–
Total current assets 212,321 374,953

Property and equipment:
Proved oil and gas properties, full cost
method 5,117,273 4,448,146
Unproved properties, not subject to
amortization 292,237 201,121
———– ———–
Total oil and gas properties 5,409,510 4,649,267
Other property and equipment 55,695 53,115
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization:
Proved oil and gas properties (2,884,411) (1,767,028)
Other properties (8,235) (5,477)
———– ———–
Total accumulated depreciation,
depletion and amortization (2,892,646) (1,772,505)
———– ———–
Total property and equipment, net 2,572,559 2,929,877

Insurance receivables – 22,132
Derivative financial instruments 902 -
Deferred income tax 12,491 -
Other Assets, net of amortization 68,932 65,831
———– ———–
TOTAL ASSETS $ 2,867,205 $ 3,392,793
=========== ===========

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 3,579 $ 3,837
Accrued liabilities 137,206 107,815
Accrued capital costs 140,941 195,833
Deferred income tax – 23,148
Abandonment liability 54,915 82,364
Accrued interest 8,262 12,567
Derivative financial instruments 27,708 -
———– ———–
Total current liabilities 372,611 425,564

Long-Term Liabilities
Abandonment liability 362,972 325,880
Deferred income tax – 319,766
Derivative financial instruments 15,017 -
Long-term debt 1,194,850 1,170,000
Other long-term liabilities 38,800 31,263
———– ———–
Total long-term liabilities $ 1,611,639 $ 1,846,909

Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 180,000,000
shares authorized; 101,806,825 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2009;
180,000,000 shares authorized, 88,846,073
shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2008 10 9
Additional paid-in capital 1,257,526 1,071,347
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
income (25,955) 78,181
Accumulated deficit (348,626) (29,217)
———– ———–
Total stockholders’ equity 882,955 1,120,320
———– ———–
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 2,867,205 $ 3,392,793
=========== ===========

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
SELECTED CASH FLOW INFORMATION (1)
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

12 Months Ended December 31,

—————————-
2009 2008
————- ————-

Operating cash flow (2) $ 531,149 $ 885,887
Changes in operating assets and liabilities 46,518 (23,870)
————- ————-
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 577,667 $ 862,017
============= =============

Net cash used in investing activities $ (747,108) $ (1,264,784)
============= =============

Net cash provided by financing activities $ 175,109 $ 387,429
============= =============

Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents $ 5,668 $ (15,338)
============= =============

(1) Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current
year presentation.
(2) See below for reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure.

Important Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This press release includes forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of
historical facts, that address activities that Mariner assumes, plans,
expects, believes, projects, estimates or anticipates (and other similar
expressions) will, should or may occur in the future are forward-looking
statements. Our forward-looking statements generally are accompanied by
words such as “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “believe,”
“expect,” “anticipate,” “potential,” “plan,” “goal,” or other words that
convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Forward-looking
statements provided in this press release are based on Mariner’s current
belief based on currently available information as to the outcome and
timing of future events and assumptions that Mariner believes are
reasonable. Mariner does not undertake to update its guidance, estimates
or other forward-looking statements as conditions change or as additional
information becomes available. Estimated reserves are related to
hydrocarbon prices. Hydrocarbon prices used in estimating reserves may
vary significantly from actual future prices. Therefore, volumes of
reserves actually recovered may differ significantly from such estimates.
Mariner cautions that its forward-looking statements are subject to all of
the risks and uncertainties normally incident to the exploration for and
development, production and sale of oil and natural gas. These risks
include, but are not limited to, price volatility or inflation,
environmental risks, drilling and other operating risks, regulatory
changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating future oil and gas
production or reserves, and other risks described in Mariner’s latest
Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents filed by Mariner with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Any of these factors could cause
Mariner’s actual results and plans of Mariner to differ materially from
those in the forward-looking statements. Investors are urged to read
Mariner’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents filed by
Mariner with the SEC.

“Proved” oil and gas reserves are those that can be estimated with
reasonable certainty to be economically and legally producible under
existing economic conditions, operating methods and government
regulations. “Probable,” “possible” and “non-proved” reserves, reserve
“potential” or “upside” or other descriptions of volumes of reserves
potentially recoverable involve estimates that by their nature are more
speculative than estimates of proved reserves and accordingly are subject
to substantially greater risk of actually being realized by Mariner. The
SEC generally does not permit a company’s filings with the SEC to include
estimates of oil or gas resources other than reserves, and any estimated
values of such resources, due to concern that resources other than
reserves are too speculative and may be misleading.

This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any securities of Mariner.

Note on reserve replacement rate: Mariner’s reserve replacement rate
reported above was calculated by dividing total estimated proved reserve
changes for the period from all sources, including acquisitions and
divestitures, by production for the same period. The method Mariner uses
to calculate its reserve replacement rate may differ from methods used by
other companies to compute similar measures. As a result, its reserve
replacement rate may not be comparable to similar measures provided by
other companies.

2009 net additions, revisions, conversions, purchases,
sales: 239.8 Bcfe
2009 production: 126.5 Bcfe

2009 proved reserves adds/2009 production: 189.6%

Note on reserve replacement cost: Reserve replacement cost is
calculated by dividing hydrocarbon development, exploration and
acquisition capital expenditures (including capitalized internal costs
and excluding hurricane expenditures net of insurance recoveries and
non-cash changes to asset retirement obligations) for the period by net
estimated proved reserve additions for the period from all sources,
including acquisitions and divestitures. Mariner’s calculation of reserve
replacement cost includes costs and reserve additions related to the
purchase of proved reserves. The method Mariner uses to calculate its
reserve replacement cost may differ significantly from methods used by
other companies to compute similar measures. As a result, its reserve
replacement cost may not be comparable to similar measures provided by
other companies. Mariner believes that providing a measure of reserve
replacement cost is useful in evaluating the cost, on a per-Mcfe basis,
to add proved reserves. However, this measure is provided in addition to,
and not as an alternative for, and should be read in conjunction with,
the information contained in our financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Due to various
factors, including timing differences in the addition of proved reserves
and the related costs to develop those reserves, reserve replacement
costs do not necessarily reflect precisely the costs associated with
particular reserves. As a result of various factors that could materially
affect the timing and amounts of future increases in reserves and the
timing and amounts of future costs, the company cannot assure you that
its future reserve replacement costs will not differ materially from
those presented.

2007 2008 2009
———– ———– ———–
(in millions)

Capital costs related to property
acq, expl, and devel 788.6 1,344.1 784.2
Hurricane expenditures, net of
insurance recoveries (12.3) (60.1) (6.6)
Proceeds from divestitures 4.1 – -
———– ———– ———–
Capital expenditures before
divestitures ($MM) (1) 780.4 1,284.0 777.6

Reserve additions (Bcfe) 222.6 256.7 239.8
Reserve Replacement Cost/Mcfe $ 3.51 $ 5.00 $ 3.24

Rolling 3-year capital expenditures 2,842.0
Rolling 3-year reserve additions 719.1
Rolling 3-year Reserve Replacement
Cost/Mcfe $ 3.95

(1) Unaudited

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measure: Adjusted Net Income

Mariner Energy’s reported net income and earnings per share for the fiscal
fourth quarter and full-year 2009 includes a non-recurring, non-cash gain
and non-cash charges. Mariner’s management believes that it is common
among investment analysts to consider earnings excluding the effects of
these items when evaluating the company’s operating results. These items
and their effects on reported earnings for the fiscal fourth quarter and
full-year 2009 are listed below.

– A non-recurring gain attributable to the December 31, 2009 acquisition
of the subsidiaries and operations of Edge Petroleum Corporation
positively impacting net income. The $107.3 million non-taxable gain
equates to $1.12 for the year and $1.06 for fourth-quarter contribution
to basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS).
– Ceiling test impairments in the fourth-quarter and full-year 2009
negatively impacted net income. For the full-year 2009, the ceiling
test impairment was $754.3 million ($494.5 million after tax), for a
$5.17 after-tax loss per basic and diluted share. For fourth-quarter
2009, the ceiling test impairment was $49.6 million ($32.5 million
after tax), for a $0.32 loss per basic and diluted share.
– A non-cash charge for a contingent withdrawal premium related to
Mariner’s participation in the OIL insurance mutual negatively impacted
net income. The additional premium was $12.0 million charge ($7.9
million after-tax) or a loss per basic and diluted share of $0.08 for
the fourth-quarter and full-year 2009.
– Non-cash stock compensation expense in the fourth-quarter and full-year
2009 negatively impacted net income. For the full-year 2009, the
expense was $25.4 million ($16.5 million after tax), which equates to
$0.17 loss per basic and diluted share. For fourth quarter 2009, this
charge was $7.1 million ($4.6 million after tax) for a loss per basic
and diluted share of $0.05.

Excluding the items above, Mariner would have reported earnings for
the fourth quarter 2009 of $21.0 million or $0.22 per basic and diluted
share. Fiscal 2009′s full year net income and basic and diluted EPS would
have been $92.2 million and $0.96, respectively. Adjusted net income
should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income
or another measure of financial performance presented in accordance with
GAAP. This is further outlined in the table below.

MARINER ENERGY, INC.
RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME
(in millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009

After-Tax After-Tax
Impact (1) EPS (2) Impact (1) EPS (3)

Net income (loss) $ 83.3 $ 0.83 $ (319.4) $ (3.34)
Gain on acquisition (107.3) (1.06) (107.3) (1.12)
Ceiling test impairment 32.5 0.32 494.5 5.17
Contingent OIL premium
charges 7.9 0.08 7.9 0.08
Stock compensation
expense 4.6 0.05 16.5 0.17
Adjusted net income
(non-GAAP) $ 21.0 $ 0.22 $ 92.2 $ 0.96

(1) Calculated using Mariner’s effective tax rate
(2) Denotes basic earnings per share. In fourth-quarter 2009 Mariner
reported $0.82 diluted earnings per share.
(3) Denotes basic and diluted earnings per share.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measure: Operating Cash Flow

Operating cash flow (OCF) is not a financial or operating measure under
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
(GAAP). The table below reconciles OCF to related GAAP information.
Mariner believes that OCF is a widely accepted financial indicator that
provides additional information about its ability to meet its future
requirements for debt service, capital expenditures and working capital,
but OCF should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net
income, operating income, net cash provided by operating activities or any
other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP
or as a measure of a company’s profitability or liquidity.

12 Months Ended
December 31,
2009 2008
——– ——–
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)

Net cash provided by operating activities $ 577,667 $ 862,017
Less: Changes in operating assets and liabilities 46,518 (23,870)
———— ———–
Operating cash flow (non-GAAP) $ 531,149 $ 885,887
============ ===========

Copyright 2010, Market Wire, All rights reserved.

-0-

Mangala oil processing terminal activation a historic achievement: Deora

Barmer (Rajasthan), Aug.29 (ANI): Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Murli Deora on Saturday described the activation of the Mangala Processing Terminal ( MPT) as a historic achievement, as the crude oil production from this block will meet about 20 percent of the nation’s current crude oil production.

He said this will enable the country to save seven percent of the crude oil import bill and reduce import dependence.

Deora was speaking at the inaugural function of the first oil frm Mangala Oil Field in Barmer developed by the consortium of Cairns Energy India and ONGC.

Emphasising the need for stabilising crude oil prices for ensuring the sustained economic growth of the country, Deora said the MPT find is a significant step towards achieving this goal.

Cairn has invested about Rs.10000 crores in the area.

The total investment in this project will be more than Rs. 20000 crores. The government will get Rs. 46000 crores as profit petroleum revenue over the life of the project and will provide job opportunities for more than 6000 people.

According to company sources, the supply terminal to the Mangala field, the second largest oil discovery in the country in two decades, will be a giant step towards curtailing the country’s oil import bill.

With an initial 30,000 barrels capacity per day (bpd), Cairn India plans to add another 1,00,000 bpd over the next 18 months.

Mangala oil field officials are confident of reaching the target of producing 1,75,000 bpd in the next 20 months.

The project would contribute more than 20 per cent of India’s domestic crude oil production by 2011, the company sources said. By Pankaj Chaudhary (ANI)

Manmohan Singh to inaugurate Mangala oil field in Rajasthan today

Barmer (Rajasthan), Aug 29 (ANI): Prime Minister Manmohan Singh will inaugurate a terminal for the supply of crude oil at Cairn India’s Mangala oilfield in Barmer, Rajasthan on Saturday.

According to company sources, the supply terminal to the Mangala field, the second largest oil discovery in the country in two decades, will be a giant step towards curtailing the country’s oil import bill.

With an initial 30,000 barrels capacity per day (bpd), Cairn India plans to add another 1,00,000 bpd over the next 18 months.

Mangala oil field officials are confident of reaching the target of producing 1,75,000 bpd in the next 20 months.

The project would contribute more than 20 per cent of India’s domestic crude oil production by 2011, the company sources said.

The Prime Minister is also scheduled to visit a National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGA) camp to review labourers’ work, and a woman self-help groups at Ramsar village, near Barmer, and ‘Harit Rajasthan’, a green plantation project being undertaken massively by the State Government to revive the water table in the state. (ANI)

Petrobras announces new oil find off Brazil

Rio de Janiero – Brazil’s state-run energy company Petrobras has announced the discovery of a new offshore oil find. The light-oil field, referred to as Iguacu, is located in the Santos Basin in the Atlantic Ocean about 340 kilometres off the Sao Paulo coast at a depth of 2,140 metres, Petrobras said Tuesday.

The find was made in a new well in the BM-S-9, or Carioca field, that was discovered in April 2008. Petrobras did not give estimates of the field’s size or volume.

The oil giant heads a consortium with Britain’s BP Group and Spain’s Repsol that jointly explores the field.

The Carioca field is located close to the Tupi oilfield, discovered in 2007, which may yield between 5 and 8 billion barrels, according to Petrobras’ estimates. (dpa)

Woodside says Vincent oil field shut after fire

SYDNEY, April 15 (Reuters) – Production from the Vincent oil field off western Australia has been halted indefinitely after a fire on Monday on board a floating production and storage facility, 60 percent owner Woodside Petroleum Ltd (WPL.AX) said on Wednesday.

The field was producing at an annual rate of 35,800 barrels of oil per day at the end of last year, a Woodside spokesman said.

The fire, which occurred on April 13, had been extinguished with no injuries to staff, the spokesman said.

Mitsui E and P Australia Pty Ltd holds a 40 percent stake in the field.

RAK Petroleum Acquires Oman Assets

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates–(Business Wire)–
RAK Petroleum PCL, the oil and gas exploration and production company, announced
today that it has acquired Indago Ventures 31 Limited and Indago Ventures 47
Limited, both wholly-owned subsidiaries of UK-based Indago Petroleum Limited,
which hold exploration rights in two concessions in the Sultanate of Oman.

The acquisition of Indago`s 50 percent share in Oman`s Block 31 and 47 brings
RAK Petroleum`s interest in these blocks to 100 percent. RAK Petroleum acquired
its existing 50 percent interest in these two concessions from Indago in 2007 as
part of a wider transaction including a 40 percent share of Oman`s Block 8.
Block 8 contains the offshore West Bukha oil field which came on production in
February.

As consideration for the latest transaction, Indago made a payment to RAK
Petroleum of $3.5 million in relation to a release, subject to certain
warranties, from all possible obligations arising from their joint activities
and past transactions.

“The acquisition of these two companies and the acquisition of Eagle Energy
(Oman) Limited holding a 10 percent share of Block 8, which RAK Petroleum
announced last week, highlight the intention to actively and aggressively expand
our exploration and production assets in the region,” stated Abdulaziz Al
Ghurair, Chairman of RAK Petroleum`s Board of Directors. “RAK Petroleum is well
positioned with significant cash reserves and is on the lookout for suitable
opportunities to add to our portfolio,” he explained.

“RAK Petroleum plans to drill the Zad-2 well in Block 47 later in 2009,” stated
Bijan Mossavar-Rahmani, RAK Petroleum`s Managing Director and Chairman of the
Executive Committee of its Board of Directors. “If successful, the Zad prospect
provides the potential of a significant gas and condensate field in a prime
location only 10 kilometers from an existing pipeline accessing Oman`s growing
gas markets,” commented Mr. Mossavar-Rahmani. “The exploration well will test
the Amin sandstone reservoir, an analogue of the nearby Kauther field,” he
noted.

RAK Petroleum PCL is registered in the Free Trade Zone of the Emirate of Ras Al
Khaimah and is operator of eight blocks located in the Sultanate of Oman and in
the United Arab Emirates, of which six are in the exploration phase and two are
undergoing appraisal for possible redevelopment.

*Source: ME NewsWire

Russia, Iraq aim to revive pre-war deals-minister

MOSCOW (Reuters) – Russia and Iraq have agreed to work on restoring contracts that they signed before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, Russia’s energy minister said after the two countries’ prime ministers met on Friday.

Russian oil major LUKOIL, in consortium with other Russian firms, signed a $3.7 billion deal to develop Iraq’s West Qurna oil field in 1996, when Saddam Hussein was in power.

“The goal has been set to restore the contracts concluded between Russian and Iraqi companies before the war,” Energy Minister Sergei Shmatko said, adding that a working group on the issue would convene in the near future.

“I believe that this is a very big move,” he told reporters following the meeting between Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and Iraq’s Nuri al-Maliki in Moscow, at which Putin accepted an invitation to visit Iraq.

Saddam’s government tore up the LUKOIL deal in 2002, months before the invasion, saying the Russian company had done no work at West Qurna since signing it and had failed to fulfil its contractual obligations.

Russia opposed the invasion in 2003.

LUKOIL has since lobbied for the current government to honor Saddam-era contracts.

JP Morgan said in March last year that, according to Russian estimates, production at the field was expected to peak at 700,000 barrels per day. “Reserves could total 4.5-7.3 billion barrels…” the bank said.

Russia agreed last year to write off most of Iraq’s remaining $12.9 billion debt and signed a separate deal to open up the country to $4 billion in investment from Russian firms but the agreement did not help LUKOIL win back the Qurna deal.

Iraq has previously said LUKOIL would have to compete with other firms for the contract. But Baghdad has renegotiated and signed another Saddam-era deal, with the Chinese National Petroleum Company.

IMPORTANT PARTNERS

“Iraq remembers well Russian companies which had helped us in different areas including oil and gas industry … We are convinced the Russian companies can and should be our important partners,” Maliki said in a statement.

Shmatko said Putin had received guarantees that Russian companies would receive equal treatment in drilling and oil services tenders announced by the Iraqi government.

Iraq last year opened up some of its most prized oil and gas fields to international firms that have been excluded for decades, part of new deals that could more than double its output within a few years.

Two of the oilfields — Majnoon and West Qurna Phase II — are classed as super giants and between them could produce 1.2 million barrels per day (bpd) when fully developed.

A LUKOIL source told Reuters in February the company would be interested in bidding for two fields offered in a round involving 11 oil and gas fields, including West Qurna and Rumaila.

Shmatko praised the Iraqi government’s effort to provide security for foreign workers and said Russia had also received “tempting offers” to work on reconstruction and upgrading of Iraqi power plants.

Putin said Russia and Iraq also discussed military cooperation, which, he said, was in a stage of “practical contacts.” Soviet Union supplied Saddam’s army with weapons and Russia is keen to regain former Soviet export markets.

(Reporting by Gleb Bryanski, editing by Anthony Barker)

UPDATE 3-Russia, Iraq aim to revive pre-war energy deals

Agreement announced after meeting of prime ministers

* Russian energy minister calls it “a very big move”

* LUKOIL has lobbied for Saddam-era contracts to stand

(Adds power plant deal)

By Gleb Bryanski

MOSCOW, April 10 (Reuters) – Russia and Iraq have agreed to work on restoring oil contracts that they signed before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, Russia’s energy minister said after the two countries’ prime ministers met on Friday.

A Russian consortium including oil group LUKOIL (LKOH.MM) signed a $3.7 billion deal to develop Iraq’s West Qurna oil field in 1996, when Saddam Hussein was in power.

“The goal has been set to restore the contracts concluded between Russian and Iraqi companies before the war,” Energy Minister Sergei Shmatko said, adding that a working group on the issue would convene in the near future.

“I believe that this is a very big move,” he told reporters after the meeting between Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and Iraq’s Nuri al-Maliki in Moscow, at which Putin accepted an invitation to visit Iraq.

Saddam’s government tore up the LUKOIL deal in 2002, months before the invasion, saying the Russian company had done no work at West Qurna since signing it and had failed to fulfil its contractual obligations.

Russia opposed the invasion in 2003. LUKOIL has since lobbied for the current government to honour Saddam-era contracts.

JP Morgan said in March last year that, according to Russian estimates, production at the field was expected to peak at 700,000 barrels per day, and reserves could total 4.5-7.3 billion barrels.

Russia agreed last year to write off most of Iraq’s remaining $12.9 billion debt and signed a separate deal to open up the country to $4 billion in investment from Russian firms, but the agreement did not help LUKOIL win back the Qurna deal.

Iraq has previously said LUKOIL would have to compete with other firms for the contract. But Baghdad has renegotiated and signed another Saddam-era deal, with the Chinese National Petroleum Company.

IMPORTANT PARTNERS

“Iraq remembers well Russian companies which had helped us in different areas including the oil and gas industry … We are convinced the Russian companies can and should be our important partners,” Maliki said in a statement.

Iraq last year opened up some of its most prized oil and gas fields to international firms that have been excluded for decades, part of new deals that could more than double its output within a few years.

Shmatko said Putin had received guarantees that Russian companies would receive equal treatment in drilling and oil services tenders announced by the Iraqi government.

The two countries also signed an agreement for a $150 million, mainly World Bank-financed, renovation of the Hartha power plant near the southern oil hub of Basra. The 18 to 24-month contract involves the rehabilitation of two units that provide 400 megawatts of power.

Most Iraqis still depend on generators for much of their electricity needs, six years after the U.S. invasion. U.S. and Iraqi officials say the restoration of basic services like power is essential to ward off public frustration that could undermine recent security gains.

(Additional reporting by Wisam Mohammed, editing by Anthony Barker and Mark Trevelyan)

Iraqi prime minister leaves for Moscow

Baghdad – Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on Thursday left Baghdad for Moscow at the beginning of a tour of European countries that Baghdad hopes will drum up investment in Iraq.

Al-Maliki hopes to sign two agreements on economic cooperation between Iraq and Russia over the course of his three-day visit to the country, according to a government statement run in Baghdad’s al- Sabbah newspaper Thursday morning.

He is also expected to discuss the return to Iraq of Russian companies, particularly those working in petroleum, water, and electric infrastructure, the newspaper said.

In meetings scheduled for Friday, al-Maliki will ask Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to supply Iraq with “sophisticated weapons systems,” al-Sabbah reported, and “Iraq’s return to playing a pivotal role in the region.”

On April 2, a Russian company signed a deal worth 80 million US dollars to deliver 22 Russian-made Mi-17 military helicopters to Iraq via a Saudi intermediary.

Al-Maliki will also discuss the possibility of Russian oil giant LUKoil’s return to the country, and the revival of old contracts with Russian companies to run Iraqi power stations.

Under a 1997 agreement, LUKoil operated Iraq’s West Qurna oil field, which, with its estimated recoverable reserves of between 11 and 15 billion barrels, is one of the country’s largest.

Russia has lobbied al-Maliki’s government to sign a new contract with LUKoil for the field. dpa

16 feared dead in North Sea ‘copter crash

London, Apr.2 (ANI): At least 16 people, 14 of them oil workers, have died in a helicopter crash in the North Sea.
The Super Puma was just over 16 miles offshore when it is believed to have suffered a catastrophic malfunction. Eight bodies have been recovered so far, The Sun reports.

Nine of those killed were British, while another was Eastern European.

Experts warned there was little hope of finding anyone alive.

The doomed aircraft, operated by rig helicopter company Bond, was returning from BP’s Miller platform 167 miles north east of Aberdeen.

The oil field stopped production in 2007 and was undergoing decommissioning.

A massive rescue operation was launched after a mayday call to staff at Aberdeen Coastguard at 1.57 p.m.
The tragedy happened six weeks after 16 offshore workers and two ‘copter crew were saved after their Super Puma also ditched in the North Sea.

The Queen last night sent a message of condolence to the victims’ families. (ANI)

ONGC to become carbon neutral in next few years

New Delhi, Jan.19 (ANI): The Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) has drawn up an elaborate programme to become carbon neutral.

The oil major has set specific targets to complete organization wide Green House Gas (GHG) accounting by 2011, as GHG certification is a pre-requisite to be carbon neutral.

Being carbon neutral, or having a zero carbon footprint, means achieving net zero carbon emissions by balancing a measured amount of carbon released with an equivalent amount sequestered (storing carbon-dioxide in a solid material through biological or physical processes) or offset.

The Navratna’s highest policy making body has approved a set of measures with timelines to reduce carbon emissions across all field activities of the company, which is being adopted as a mission on Carbon Neutrality by ONGC. During GHG accounting, emission inventory of oil-field installations like rigs and platforms would be calculated, based on which field-specific targets for GHG emission reduction will be drawn up.

This would be followed up by engineering interventions to improve energy and carbon efficiency including energy audits at the installations. The organizational systems and processes would be reoriented to maintain the GHG accounting protocol.

Being carbon neutral will also help ONGC improve operational processes in terms of energy efficiency and adoption of better technology, leading to better business economics.

R S Sharma, CMD of ONGC and also President of the Indian arm of United Nation’s Global Compact (formed to consolidate corporate action to advance universal values around human rights, environment, labour standards and anti-corruption) said, “ONGC will spearhead corporate action to mitigate climate change, leading to zero carbon footprint – a commitment for a Green Society”. (ANI)