Military aid to Pakistan not feasible when trainers are being asked to leave: US

WASHINGTON: The US on Monday said it could not have continued with certain categories of military aid to Pakistan at a time when American trainers, who deliver on the assistance, were being asked to leave the country, justifying its decision to discontinue USD 800 million in aid.

The Obama administration, however, asserted that there was no change in its civilian aid to Pakistan.

“With regard to US military assistance to Pakistan, in certain categories, those categories where we need our trainers to be in-country in order to deliver and train on the assistance, we obviously can't do that in an environment where Pakistan has asked our trainers to go,” State Department spokesperson, Victoria Nuland, told reporters at her daily news conference.

“Then in other military categories, we have had a slowing and a pause in some categ

ories while we work through some of these issues where we have been concerned,” she said in response to questions about US suspending some categories of military aid to Pakistan.

Contradicting Pakistani Army's statement that it was not notified about suspension of aid, Nuland said the Administration has been in constant contact with Islamabad about these issues throughout.

“The Special US Representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Mark Grossman, and the Pakistani Ambassador to US, Husain Haqqani, were on the phone even this morning, and those conversations will continue,” she said.

Refraining from elaborating on what steps US wants Pakistan to take before the suspension of aid could be lifted, the spokesperson said the US has been looking to improve its cooperation with Pakistan in counterterrorism and counterinsurgency.

zp8497586rq

Bin Laden killed in Pakistan

Osama bin Laden has been killed in an American operation in Pakistan, President Obama announced from the White House on Sunday, calling his death “the most significant achievement to date in our nation’s effort to defeat al-Qaida.”

In a statement delivered from the East Room, Obama said a small team of U.S. personnel attacked a compound in Pakistan’s Abbottabad Valley, where bin Laden had been hiding since late last summer. The U.S. team killed the 54-year-old al-Qaida leader after a firefight and “took custody of his body,” Obama said.

“We will be relentless in defense of our citizens and our friends and allies,” a somber Obama said in a nine-minute statement. “We will be true to the values that make us who we are. And on nights like this one we can say to families who have lost loved ones to al-Qaida’s terror: Justice has been done.”

The killing of bin Laden — which set off cheers outside the White House gates and lit up the Internet with celebration — will provide a clear moment of victory for Obama. It comes at a time of deep political turmoil overseas that is upending long-standing U.S. policy in much of the Muslim world, particularly the Arab Middle East.

The news also drew praise across the usually tall partisan divide.

House Republican leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said in a statement: “The men and women of our armed forces and intelligence community have fought valiantly for the last decade, and this is a major victory and testament to their dedication.”

Bin Laden was holed up in a two-story mansion in the Bilal area of Abbottabad, about 60 miles north of Islamabad, when four helicopters carrying U.S. anti-terror forces swooped in the early-morning hours of Monday and killed him.

Flames rose from the building that was the apparent target of the raid as it was confirmed that the world’s most wanted fugitive died not in a cave, but in a town best known as a garrison for the Pakistani military. A U.S. official said one of bin Laden’s sons and three others also were killed in the raid, but the official did not name them.

Pakistani officials and a witness said bin Laden’s guards opened fire from the roof of the building, and one of the choppers crashed. The sound of at least two explosions rocked the town. U.S. officials said no Americans were harmed in the raid.

Women and children were taken into custody during the raid, said an official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information.

Abbotabad resident Mohammad Haroon Rasheed said the raid happened about 1:15 a.m. local time.

“I heard a thundering sound, followed by heavy firing. Then firing suddenly stopped. Then more thundering, then a big blast,” he said. “In the morning when we went out to see what happened, some helicopter wreckage was lying in an open field.”

The development comes two months before Obama is scheduled to begin bringing home some of the 100,000 U.S. troops serving in Afghanistan, a drawdown he promised when he widened the American involvement there at the end of 2009.

Public support for the war and Obama’s management of it has deteriorated steadily since then, in part because many Americans are uncertain of the long-term U.S. goal in the nearly decade-old conflict and how much progress international forces have made there over that time. More Americans disapprove of Obama’s management of the war than approve of it, according to a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Whether bin Laden’s death will have a tangible impact on al-Qaida’s operational capability is unclear, given that, hunkered down in Pakistan’s lawless border region for years, he has served more as the group’s spiritual leader than military commander.

But it almost certainly will help lift support for U.S. involvement in the war, which Obama intends to wind down through 2014, and give the president an irrefutable national-security achievement to showcase during his re-election effort. Obama said he first received intelligence of bin Laden’s possible whereabouts in August, and gave the order Sunday for the operation that ended in his death.

“There is no doubt that al-Qaida will continue to pursue attacks against us,” Obama said. “We must and we will remain vigilant at home and abroad. As we do, we must also reaffirm that the United States is not at war with islam.”

With the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks approaching this year, bin Laden’s assassination could benefit Obama domestically even more than the capture of former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein helped propel former President George W. Bush to re-election in 2004.

Although former Bush officials were quick to declare bin Laden’s death a military victory that transcended party lines, it represented the culmination of Bush’s promise, never fulfilled during his time in office, to capture the al-Qaida leader “dead or alive.”

One senior U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity said the Obama administration is considering burying bin Laden’s body at sea, to prevent the creation of a place of homage to the al-Qaida leader.

“We don’t want a bunch of people going to the shrine forever,’ the official said.

That bin Laden was killed — rather than captured — was a victory itself for U.S. officials, who had dreaded the prospect of a long, complicated legal battle if the al-Qaida leader was taken into U.S. custody alive.

With the military brig at Guantánamo Bay no longer being used to house new detainees, and with the country paralyzed by the politics of where and how to try other alleged perpetrators of the Sept. 11 attacks, the logistics of trying bin Laden could have turned the capture into a spectacle. Now, while bin Laden may become a martyr to his supporters, it will be as an invisible hero.

“Every day he was alive was a symbolic victory,” said Dan Byman, director of research at the Saban Center for Middle East policy at the Brookings Institution and professional staff member on the 9/11 commission. “This is a man we have hunted with different degrees of intensity for more than 10 years. … His successful defiance was damaging to the United States.”

Bin Laden, the 54-year-old son of a billionaire Saudi Arabian contractor, was wanted by the United States not only for the Sept. 11 attacks but also for al-Qaida’s bombings of U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya in 1998, which killed 224 civilians and wounded more than 5,000 people. The U.S. government had offered a $25 million reward for information leading to his capture or death.

He was one of a handful of Islamic radicals who founded al-Qaida — which means “the base” in Arabic — in 1988 to coordinate the efforts of various groups fighting the Soviet army in Afghanistan. After the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan, al-Qaida eventually shifted its effort to target another superpower — the United States.

In what appeared at the time as a quixotic campaign, al-Qaida embraced a terrorist agenda to pressure Washington to withdraw U.S. troops from Saudi Arabia and cease its support of its allies in the Arab world. In 1996, bin Laden and al-Qaida issued a written declaration of war against the United States.

There had been no definitive sightings reported of bin Laden since December 2001, when he outfoxed the U.S. military and its proxy Afghan forces at the battle of Tora Bora and slipped away, presumably over the border into Pakistan.

His voice was ostensibly last heard in public in January, when al-Qaida’s propaganda arm released an audio statement from him warning France to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan.

He regularly mocked the inability of the United States and its allies to find him, issuing dozens of audio and video tapes broadcast on the Internet and on television networks such as al-Jazeera. Despite the frequency of his statements, U.S. intelligence officials were unable to follow the trail back to the al-Qaida leader.

Senior U.S. intelligence officials said bin Laden had remained in control of al-Qaida’s central command and that its leadership council still reported to him, even as his whereabouts were carefully concealed. But they said bin Laden weighed in on major management decisions less frequently than he did before 2001 due to security precautions that left him inaccessible for long periods of time.

His death marks the culmination of a decadelong CIA effort that officials said began to build momentum against al-Qaida because of two key factors: a major escalation in the campaign of armed Predator and Reaper drones, and an expanding network of informants that the CIA has assembled from stations inside Afghanistan along the Pakistan border.

Indeed, officials said the two components became mutually reinforcing. Drone strikes not only killed militants associated with al-Qaida but sent ripples of anxiety through the network and forced operatives to take substantial risks as they searched for cover.

At the same time, the toll of the drone strikes eroded morale among militant networks, contributing to the agency’s effort to assemble a network of informants independent of Pakistan’s intelligence services. As the network grew, it fed new intelligence into an elaborate operation used to identify new targets for the drones.

Yet, counterterrorism cooperation between the United States and Pakistan had been at one of its lowest ebbs in the decade since the Sept. 11 attacks.

Pakistan has threatened to expel CIA operatives from the country and to force the United States to suspend drone strikes against insurgents and al-Qaida targets — threats that the CIA has brushed aside in increasingly defiant fashion. But Obama said Sunday night that he called Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari to inform him of the operation.

The CIA has carried out 23 drone strikes this year, including one the day after Pakistan’s intelligence chief had visited CIA headquarters to demand changes in the relationship. Another strike came one day after Pakistan released a CIA security operative who had been jailed after fatally shooting two Pakistani men in Lahore.

What effect bin Laden’s death will have on al-Qaida’s operations is uncertain.

Bin Laden’s death means he likely will be replaced at the helm by Ayman al-Zawahiri, an Egyptian surgeon who has long served as his chief deputy. Although he also has been in hiding over the past decade, Zawahiri has been the most visible face and voice of al-Qaida, issuing even more audio and video propaganda statements than bin Laden.

Zawahiri, however, is considered a polarizing figure within the top circles of al-Qaida and long has antagonized Islamic radicals from other factions. U.S. counterterrorism officials predicted he would have a much tougher time preserving unity within al-Qaida and attracting fresh followers.

Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert and professor of security studies at Georgetown University, said bin Laden had made preparations for his death ever since 1998 and that al-Qaida almost certainly had a succession plan in place.

Bin Laden repeatedly has said he looked forward to becoming a martyr for al-Qaida’s cause; some analysts said he probably did not expect to live as long as he did.

“Zawahiri becomes the obvious heir apparent, and I think he’s been running the organization in any event,” Hoffman said. “The question is, how effective will Zawahiri be in filling bin Laden’s shoes?”

Payday Lenders and Payday Employees Fear for Their Jobs

LOS ANGELES, July 18 /PRNewswire/ — The Financial Reform Bill has passed congress and is on its way to be signed by President Obama. One of the things this bill will do is create a new government agency to oversee and regulate the financial lending industry. This agency will be called Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CFPB, along with many of the politicians who supported the bill, have vowed to put all sorts of caps and limitations on the short term lending industry, which includes the payday loan industry.

Many payday lenders and their employees, like Pay1Day.com, are worried about their future because they believe that they are already overregulated by their respective States. For example, the State of Arizona recently banned payday loans, which forced many payday lenders, like Solomon Finance, out of the State. The act of banning payday loans and having to shut down business resulted in thousands of citizens losing their jobs.

“The payday loan industry is already closely regulated,” said Gabe Rodriguez, who is a known author for a website that writes about payday loans. He goes on to say, “States that have allowed regulated payday lending have very few complaints against our industry.”

According to a comment left a one of the online payday loan blogs, an employee for a small payday loan company said:

“I work in a payday/small loan company. I am getting so flustered with all of this. Every day I wait on news that will shut us down or news that they will leave us alone. I feel as if many of us are on pins and needles wondering if soon we will be in the unemployment lines. Job security is gone, and a lot of the zest that I once had is fizzling out.. I am not alone in this.. There is uncertainty in the air… I sure wish at least we knew what and when these changes would occur.”

Payday lenders feel that the financial reform bill is not addressing the root causes of what led the US economy to collapse in 2008. It was well documented and evident that subprime mortgages, the major wall street banks irresponsible lending, and the greed of CEOs and CFOs of those banks and financial institutions were the causes for the deep recession of 2008. In other words small lenders such as payday loan lenders had nothing to do with it yet may be overregulated as the result of the passage of this new financial overhaul.

SOURCE Pay1Day.com

Solar’s Long and Winding Road

In 1969, the Nixon White House asked a young assistant professor of engineering at the University of Maryland whether solar energy made sense for America. Absolutely, he replied.

Four decades later, Fred Morse is still trying to persuade the government to put its muscle behind solar. Last week, he scored a big victory.

In his weekly radio address on July 3, President Obama announced that the Department of Energy had awarded a $1.45 billion loan guarantee to Abengoa Solar — a Spanish company where Morse is senior advisor for U.S. operations — to build one of the largest solar power plants in the world near Gila Bend, Arizona. Obama said:

Once completed, this plant will be the first large-scale solar plant in the U.S. to actually store the energy it generates for later use — even at night. And it will generate enough clean, renewable energy to power 70,000 homes.

What he didn’t say is that the plant, called Solana, has been in the works since 2007, when Abengoa bought an old alfalfa farm on which to site the plant. If all goes well, it will begin to make electricity in 2013. That’s right–six years, at least, to build a power plant with mostly proven technology.

You’re a patient man, I told Morse when we spoke the other day by phone. “I have to be,” he replied. Forty years waiting for an industry to be born will do that to you.

Morse is a neighbor of mine in Bethesda, Md., and we belong to the same (green) synagogue, Adat Shalom Reconstructionist Congregation, so we’ve chatted occasionally about solar. I’ve been struck by the time that’s required to bring big solar plants that require public subsidies to market, so when the news broke that Abengoa’s plant had cleared a big hurdle, we arranged to talk again.

One reason why the government agencies involved are taking such a long look at the Solana plant is its size, Morse explained. The plant is expected to cost as much as $2 billion, it will create about 1,600 jobs during construction and generate up to 280 megawatts of power (30 of which will be needed to run the plant itself.) Solana will need about 900,000 mirrors, which will be made near Phoenix, and about 97,000 receivers, which will be made by a German firm called Schott Solar in Albuquerque.

“The amount of steel in the structure, to hold the mirrors, is enough to build a second Golden Gate bridge. It’s big. It’s very very big,” Morse said.

The plant uses a technology known as Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) or solar thermal technology, which uses parabolic mirrors to focus the sun’s heat on a fluid which then heats up 700 degrees, heating water to create steam to run turbines.

Here’s an artist’s rendering:

Next page: Why size matters with solar.

!–pagebreak–

Size tends to be a good thing when building power plants; economies of scale keep costs down. But the regulatory agencies whose approval is needed — they range from the Arizona Department of Transportation to the White House Office of Management Budget — tend to take a closer look when people start talking about billions of dollars.

For example, Arizona Public Service, the utility company that has agreed to buy the electricity generated by Solana, had to get approval from the Arizona Corporation Commission to build the plant. Even after federal subsidies are factored in, the power will cost about 19 percent more, according to this 2008 blog. (Natural gas prices have dropped since then, so the differential is probably even greater.) APS has agreed to buy $4 billion worth of electricity from the plant over the next 30 years, in part because to comply with a state law requiring utilities to generate at least 15 percent of their electricity from renewable sources.

You’d think that with a 30-year $4-billion revenue stream that Abengoa, a well-established company with more than $4 billion euros in revenue last year, could obtain financing for the project on the private market … but no. By the fall of 2008, when state regulators okayed the project, the credit markets had frozen. “It was clear that it was going to be very difficult to finance Solana without a federal loan guarantee,” Morse said.

The DOE and OMB analyzed the application for more than a year before giving last week’s conditional okay. Under the provisions of the Energy Act of 2005, the source of the financing, Abengoa had to demonstrate that the plant was innovative, which it is, because it will include new technology enabling energy to be stored for up to six years. But they also had to assure DOE and especially OMB, which tends to be risk-averse, that the storage technology would work because the government is wary of putting its money behind risky schemes. This is the kind of fine line that companies have to negotiate to obtain tax money.

Morse, who worked for DOE for 13 years, understands the dynamic well.

“As a taxpayer, I don’t want to see a big project die in the field and waste a lot of money,” he said. “On the other hand, you want to encourage projects that are innovative and new, and Congress appropriated money to cover some of that risk.”

Another two dozen or so Concentrating Solar Power projects are in various stages of development, most requiring loan guarantees. Morse is rooting for them to succeed, and fast. “We have to build more because you cannot get your supply chain all cranked up, and then have to stop,” he said.

Abengoa wants to build a second large U.S. plant in the Mojave Desert, for which it has a signed power purchase agreement with PG&E Corp. It’s also building plants in Spain, Algeria, Morocco and Abu Dhabi.

This is all encouraging news, but none of it is happening fast enough. We don’t have another 40 years to wait around for this industry to get going.

On a related note, I will be moderating The Energy Collective’s next webinar, “Is There Hope for Solar? Examining the prospects for scaling up solar energy” on July 14th at 1pm ET. Joining me will be Michael Jungreis, business development manager for Siemens Concentrated Solar Power Ltd. and investigative reporting and solar expert Osha Gray Davidson.

Coast Guard’s Allen expects BP plan to catch more oil

June 13 (Reuters) – U.S. Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen, the Obama administration’s point man on the BP (BP.L) (BP.N) Gulf of Mexico oil spill, said on Sunday he expected the company to offer a plan later in the day to capture more of the gushing oil.

Speaking on CBS’s “Face The Nation,” Allen said: “We hope to get an answer on that later on today, in fact we will get an answer.”

(Reporting by Alan Elsner; Editing by Eric Walsh)

Houston Criminal Defense Attorney John Floyd Announces Publication of “The Continued Assault on Miranda Rights”

HOUSTON, TX, Jun 13 (MARKET WIRE) —
Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd has published a new series of
articles discussing two recent attempts to lessen the Miranda Rights of
suspects in criminal investigations.

Floyd’s first article, The Continued Assault on Miranda, discusses the
Obama Administration’s delicate balancing act in considering modifying
the long-standing public safety exception of Miranda v. Arizona,
potentially adopting the politically popular sentiment that “Miranda
warnings” should not be given to terror suspects.

In another piece, U.S. Supreme Court Takes another Bite Out of Miranda,
Floyd discusses Berghuis v. Thompkins, a recent U.S. Supreme Court
decision which requires that a criminal suspect unambiguously invoke his
or her right to remain silent.

“Thompkins stands as yet another indication that the Supreme Court would
constitutionally bless any attempt by the Obama administration and
Congress to modify the ‘public safety exception’ in terrorism cases. In
three cases this year alone the high court has tightened the noose around
Miranda’s neck — and as pointed out by Justice Sotomayer, the court had
to walk over a number of precedents to justify that noose tightening. We
believe that unless this dangerous trend is reversed soon, before the
next quarter of this century has passed, Miranda will have been overruled
and hang as a relic in some legal museum,” says Floyd.

For the Firm’s publications regarding this topic and other articles
relevant to criminal law from a defense perspective visit
http://www.johntfloyd.com/. For publications regarding other recent
decisions by the Supreme Court visit

http://www.johntfloyd.com/comments.htm.

About the John T. Floyd Firm:

Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd has been rated as among the best and
brightest attorneys practicing criminal law and has been recognized as
one of Houston’s Top Lawyers for the People (2008, 2009), Top Lawyers:
Criminal Defense (2008, 2009, 2010) and has earned a “Superb” rating,
scoring 10/10, from AVVO. He has appeared on national television and
radio programs as an expert on criminal law related issues and has been
quoted in newspapers and other news outlets throughout the country.

Contact:
John T. Floyd Law Firm
Houston Criminal Defense Lawyers
440 Louisiana, Ste. 1900
Houston, Texas 77002

713-224-0101
www.JohnTFloyd.com

Copyright 2010, Market Wire, All rights reserved.

Unmanned hunter

Washington, June 5 — While part of the reason for Pakistani-American Faisal Shahzad’s abortive car bombing in New York’s Times Square is said to have been the US campaign of Predator strikes in Pakistani territory, this strategy is now central to how the Obama Administration approaches quelling terrorist outfits in that country especially in North Waziristan. According to the latest data from Long War Journal, which is the standard for tracking covert airstrikes in Pakistan, the number of such attacks till May 15 this year has already matched that for 2008 and could soon equal that for all of last year. There have been 36 strikes this year as against 53 in 2009. Intelligence analyst and Long War Journal’s Managing Editor Bill Roggio said, “It could break last year’s total some time in July at this pace.” While the strategy originally had been to strike at high value target, it now also involves targeting Al Qaeda’s external networks, those that want to strike in the US, as well as the training camps of the multitude of terror outfits that have made their base mainly in North Waziristan. Even Punjabi Taliban groups appear to have moved to the North after the Pakistan Army’s operations in South Waziristan. While there has been pressure from the US on Pakistan to move into North Waziristan, especially after the Times Square episode, Pakistan’s Army has been reluctant to do so. In fact, the group which Shahzad was linked to, the Tehrik-e-Taliban or the Pakistan Taliban is centred in North Waziristan. That is where he also received training in bomb making. In addition, while the majority of attacks are undertaken by the MQ-1 Predator, another advanced drone, the MQ-9 Reaper has also been introduced into the theater. However, there are no numbers for a break down of strikes by category of drone.

An official said, “The US Air Force proposed the MQ-9 system in response to the Department of Defense request for Global War on Terrorism initiatives. It is larger and more powerful than the MQ-1 Predator and is designed to go after time-sensitive targets with persistence and precision, and destroy or disable those targets.”

Timeline: Gulf of Mexico oil spill

April 20, 2010 – Explosion and fire on Transocean Ltd’s drilling rig Deepwater Horizon licensed to BP; 11 workers are killed. The rig was drilling in BP’s Macondo project 42 miles southeast of Venice, Louisiana, beneath about 5,000 feet of water and 13,000 feet under the seabed.

April 22 – The Deepwater Horizon rig, valued at more than $560 million, sinks and a five mile long oil slick is seen.

April 25 – The Coast Guard says remote underwater cameras detect the well is leaking 1,000 barrels of crude oil per day. It approves a plan to have remote underwater vehicles activate a blowout preventer and stop leak. Efforts to activate the blowout preventer fail.

April 28 – The Coast Guard says the flow of oil is 5,000 barrels per day (bpd) (210,000 gallons/795,000 liters) — five times greater than first estimated. A controlled burn is held on the giant oil slick.

April 29 – Obama pledges “every single available resource,” including the U.S. military, to contain the spreading spill.

– Obama also says BP is responsible for the cleanup. Louisiana declares state of emergency due to the threat to the state’s natural resources.

April 30 – An Obama aide says no drilling will be allowed in new areas, as the president had recently proposed, until the cause of the Deepwater Horizon accident is known.

– BP Chairman Tony Hayward says the company takes full responsibility for the spill and would pay all legitimate claims and the cost of the cleanup.

May 2 – Obama visits the Gulf Coast to see cleanup efforts first hand. U.S. officials close areas affected by the spill to fishing for an initial period of 10 days. BP starts to drill a relief well alongside the failed well, a process that could take two to three months to complete.

May 5 – A barge begins towing a 98-ton containment chamber to the site of the leak. BP says one of the three leaks has been shut off by capping a valve, but that would not cut the amount of oil gushing out.

May 6 – Oil washes ashore on the Chandeleur Islands off the Louisiana coast, uninhabited barrier islands that are part of the Breton National Wildlife Refuge.

May 7 – BP tries to lower a containment dome over the leak, but the 100-tonne device was rendered useless by a slush of frozen hydrocarbons that clogged it. — A fishing ban for federal waters off the Gulf is modified, expanded and extended to May 17.

May 9 – BP says it might try to plug the undersea leak by pumping materials such as shredded up tires and golf balls into the well at high pressure, a method called a “junk shot.”

May 11/12 – Executives from BP, Transocean and Halliburton appear at congressional hearings in Washington. Senate Energy committee chairman Jeff Bingaman says that it appeared that the explosion on the rig was due to a “cascade of errors, technical, human and regulatory. The executives blame each other’s companies.

May 14 – Obama slams companies involved in the spill, criticizing them for a “ridiculous spectacle” of publicly trading blame over the accident in his sternest comments yet.

May 16 – BP succeeds in inserting a tube into the leaking well and capturing some oil and gas.

May 18 – The U.S. nearly doubles a no-fishing zone in waters affected by the oil, extending it to 19 percent of U.S. waters in the Gulf.

May 19 – The first heavy oil from the spill sloshes ashore in fragile Louisiana marshlands and part of the mess enters a powerful current that could carry it to Florida and beyond.

May 26 – A “top kill” maneuver starts involving pumping heavy fluids and other material into the well shaft to stifle the flow, then sealing it with cement.

May 28 – Obama tours the Louisiana Gulf coast on his second visit – “I am the president and the buck stops with me,” he said.

– BP CEO Tony Hayward flies over the Gulf. BP says that the cost of the disaster so far is $930 million. May 29 – BP says the complex “top kill” maneuver to plug the well has failed, crushing hopes for a quick end to the largest oil spill in U.S. history already in its 40th day.

May 31 – The U.S. government and BP are warning that the blown-out oil well may not be stopped until August as the company prepares a new attempt to capture leaking crude.

June 1 – BP shares plunge 17 percent in London trading, wiping $23 billion off its market value, on news its latest attempt to plug the well has failed.

(Reporting by Erwin Seba and Ros Krasny: Additional writing and editing by David Cutler, London Editorial Reference Unit)

Israeli PM rejects “flawed” U.N. nuclear declaration

(Reuters) – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected a U.N. declaration that urged his country to put its nuclear facilities under U.N. safeguards, saying it singled out Israel while letting Iran off the hook.

World

In an interview with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation broadcast on Sunday night, Netanyahu said he did not think Israel would participate the U.N. resolution’s implementation.

The declaration adopted on Friday by all 189 parties to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, including the United States, called for a conference in 2012 to discuss banning weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East.

The creation of such a zone could ultimately force Israel to sign the NPT and abandon any atomic weapons it has.

The document urged Israel to sign the NPT and open its nuclear facilities to U.N. inspection.

“I thought that was a particularly distorted and flawed resolution because it singled out Israel, the only true democracy in the Middle East and the only country anywhere on Earth threatened with annihilation,” Netanyahu told CBC.

“It failed to mention Iran, which brazenly violates the Non-Proliferation Treaty, is racing to arm itself with atomic weapons and openly expresses its wish to see Israel wiped off the face of the Earth,” Netanyahu said.

Israel is presumed to have a sizable nuclear arsenal but neither confirms nor denies it. It is the only Middle East state that has not signed the NPT and, like India and Pakistan, which have exploded nuclear devices, did not participate in a month-long U.N. meeting in New York to review the NPT.

The declaration contained plans for further disarmament, strengthening global non-proliferation efforts and ensuring access to technology for peaceful uses. It called on North Korea to return to the NPT, which it left in 2003.

The Obama administration opposed efforts to single out Israel and said it would not put the Jewish state under any pressure to do anything that would undermine its security. The White House deplored the document’s failure to mention Iran.

Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful generation of electric power. The United States and other Western countries suspect it is aimed at producing nuclear weapons.

Netanyahu said the U.N. should be focusing on Iran.

“The greatest threat to mankind today … is if a radical Islamic regime meets up with nuclear weapons or nuclear weapons meet up with a radical Islamic regime,” he told CBC,

“The first is called Iran and the second is called the Taliban takeover of Pakistan. These developments could … change the world,” Netanyahu said.

(Reporting by Anthony Boadle, editing by David Stamp)

‘Indian cooperation required to deal with global challenge’

It is unthinkable of a global challenge that doesn’t require Indian cooperation, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs William J Burns, who just returned from New Delhi where he had a firsthand experience of the country’s growth, has said.

In a blog ‘An Indispensable US Partnership With the World’s Largest Democracy’ posted on the website of the State Department yesterday, Burns said he can’t think of a global challenge today that doesn’t require Indian cooperation – climate change, counter-terrorism, international economic stability, nuclear nonproliferation, economic growth and the list goes on.

“I had good discussions on all these issues while in Delhi. Not only do our countries share the same democratic values, but our leaders also share the same vision in shaping the 21st century.

It wasn’t a coincidence that President Obama invited Prime Minister Singh for the first State visit of his presidency last November, and the President will further advance our bilateral cooperation when he visits India later this year,” Burns wrote.

Burns who was in New Delhi to hold talks with his Indian counterparts on May 24, said everywhere, he saw signs of India’s dynamism.

India’s trillion dollar economy is churning out mass rapid transit systems, high tech office parks, and expressways at a pace unimagined only a few years ago, he wrote.

Delhi’s airport is about to open one of the largest and most modern terminals in the world, to match the longest (and newest) runway in Asia.

The newest part of greater Delhi, including the high tech boom town of Gurgaon, finds Indian and American firms designing, marketing, and supporting the latest innovations in the world of technology and services, he observed.

Burns also expressed condolences to the families of those killed in yesterday’s train accident.

“I was saddened to learn of today’s train crash in West Bengal that claimed at least 70 lives and wounded more than 200 and extend my deep condolences to the families of the victims,” he said.

The top US diplomat said his discussions with National Security Adviser Shiv Shankar Menon and Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao were rooted in US’s strong support for India’s rise as a more consequential actor on the international stage.

“Indeed, the level and candour of our exchange on security developments in Asia, Africa and the Middle East reminded me a lot of conversations with some of our closest allies.

Meanwhile, the planeload of “Blue Beret” Indian peacekeepers I saw waiting to embark at the airport when we arrived reminded me of India’s growing military reach and its role as a provider of security in the Indian Ocean and beyond,” he said.

“At the working level, we’ve been identifying ways to expand the full range of our bilateral activities – from defense and counter-terrorism cooperation to export controls, the civil nuclear agreement, and collaboration in agriculture, health, education, and more,” Burns said.

“Foreign Secretary Rao hosted a lunch with other Indian Joint Secretaries in which we discussed regional and multilateral issues, to include our strong support for India’s development efforts in Afghanistan and our plans to coordinate even more closely on United Nations issues,” he said.

Referring to his meeting with Science and Technology Minister Prithviraj Chavan, Burns said they talked about the opportunities for technological cooperation leading up to and beyond the Strategic Dialogue, and the unique partnership between the two countries in using technology for development.

“We’re both excited about the extent and calibre of US-India S&T collaboration, which spans the tiniest microbes to the vastness of outer space.

I also had some interesting conversations with Dr Montek Singh Ahluwalia, the dynamic Deputy Chairman of Indi a’s Planning Commission, on our cooperation in clean energy, weather forecasting, export controls and food security and the high expectations for next month’s meeting of the US-India CEOs forum,” he said.

Burns said he is confident that the knowledge societies of the US and India, linked together, can be a force for major technological breakthroughs in the 21st century, improving the lives of Indians, Americans, and the global community in the process.

Looking forward to continuing these conversations with his Indian counterparts when they come to Washington, next week for the Strategic Dialogue, he said this will provide an important institutionalised mechanism for identifying and advancing their shared bilateral priorities and ensuring that what they do as governments keeps pace with the rapid growth of ties between their people, companies, NGOs and universities.

‘Nervy’ Pak in denial mode over ‘threatening’ US dossier

Pakistan has denied receiving any dossier from the United States, which purportedly described the failed Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad’s links with the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), that was accompanied with the veiled US threat of action against terrorists on its soil.

“You better put this question to officials of the Interior Ministry, however, I confirm it to you that Foreign Office has not been consulted so for in this regard,” The Nation quoted a Foreign Office spokesman, as responding to a question whether Islamabad has received any dossier in connection with botched May 1 terror plot.

Earlier, a report in the Los Angeles Times said that the US has given a blunt message to Pakistan that it would be under “inevitable pressure” to take immediate and stern action if a successful terror attack is traced back to that country.

The report cited officials privy to the recent meeting between President Obama’s National Security Advisor James Jones,Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director Leon Panetta and Pakistan’s political and military leadership, as saying that during the talks the top US officials told Islamabad in clear terms that it needed to intensify its crackdown in the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

“We have been lucky in the past, but our luck will run out and in the future, we are likely to face successful attacks,” the newspaper quoted a senior U.S. intelligence official, as saying.

According to officials, both Jones and Panetta, during their Islamabad visit earlier this month, had told both the Pakistani civilian and military leadership that there was ‘hard’ evidence to prove that Faisal Shahzad, the confessed Times Square bomb plotter, received terror training by the TTP in the lawless tribal areas of the country along the Afghanistan border.

“The chart, which was assembled by U.S. intelligence agencies, showed who all he had contacts with, and drew clear links between Faisal Shahzad and the TTP leaders in Pakistan,” officials said.

Jones and Panetta did not spell out possible action the U.S. might take, however, the delegation did not rule out military action, said an official privy to the meeting.

According to experts and officials, US’ action would depend on the circumstances of an attack and the strength of the evidence implicating militants in Pakistan.

Former CIA official and a terrorism expert at the Brookings Institution, Bruce Riedel, said the pressure on the White House to act could be ‘overwhelming.’

“Professions by the Pakistanis that they are trying hard won”t cut it anymore,” Riedel said.

US urges China to punish North Korea for S. Korea ship sinking

Beijing, May 24 (ANI): The United States on Sunday asked China to back punitive measures against North Korea over strong evidence that Pyongyang was involved in the sinking of the South Korean warship, Cheonan.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton met Dai Bingguo, a state councilor of China who oversees foreign affairs, and raised the South Korean government report that formally accused the North of torpedoing the Cheonan in March, killing 46 sailors.

“We want them to take some steps in the international arena to underscore the seriousness of the matter,” the New York Times quoted a senior Obama administration official, as saying.

“We have to be realistic about what we can expect,” he added.

The official said Beijing is still digesting the findings of the investigation, which was aided by the United States and other countries.

China has reacted with extreme caution, waiting for days to express sorrow to South Korea for the loss of the crew and expressing skepticism about North Korea’s role. (ANI)

Pak Taliban `plot” places US on alert

New York, May 21 (ANI): New information gathered this week indicates that the Pakistani Taliban is actively planning to strike the US.

According to a news.com.au report, Central Intelligence Agency director Leon Panetta and Obama”s National Security Advisor James Jones reportedly knew of the threat before they visited Pakistan this week.

The pair told Islamabad of the new threat, which did not specify cities that may be targeted. (ANI)

Obama’s former pastor says the President “threw him under the bus”

London, May 19 (ANI): In an impassioned letter to the President of an African relief fundraising group, US President Obama’s former pastor has written that he is considered “toxic” by the Obama administration, and accused the US President of “throwing him under the bus”.

The embittered pastor Jeremiah Wright, made the statements in relation to his pleas to the Obama administration to release frozen funds for earthquake ravaged Haiti, which the pastor believes will be ignored in all likelihood.

Wright is known for shooting off his mouth and has made absurd claims earlier when at a National Press Club appearance in April 2008, he said that the US government could plant AIDS in the black community, praised Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and suggested Obama was putting his pastor at arm”s length for political purposes while privately agreeing with him, The Telegraph reports.

Following these remarks Obama had condemned Wright as a “divisive and destructive” man and had severed all ties with him. (ANI)

White House gatecrashers demand apology

New York, May 19 (ANI): Michaele and Tareq Salahi, who gate-crashed last year’s U.S. State Dinner, have now demanded an apology from the White House.

The duo say they”ve been the target of pranks and death threats following the security scandal, in which the pair was admitted without an invitation to a soiree for the Prime Minister of India, even managing to shake the hands of President Obama and Vice President Biden.

“It would be nice if somebody apologized to us and for (the White House) to call it quits,” the New York Daily News quoted Tareq as telling Radar Online.

“I would certainly not treat anyone this way that comes to my house, even if there was a question about an invitation, or there was some miscommunication … I would still welcome anyone and be gracious.”

Michaele added: “The American way is to love people.”

The two have been the focus of all negative attention since the fiasco, which even cost White House Social Secretary Desiree Rogers her job.

In one incident, Michelle received a package at their Virginia home containing a used condom.

“It is a totally different life now and is really impossible to describe,” Tareq Salahi told Radar.

The pair insists that they were invited to the soiree.

“Without a doubt, there is no question that we were extended an invitation,” Tareq said.

“Nobody realized this but we were asked for our social security number, our date of birth, our full legal name and our citizenship for clearance for the White House state dinner. Not for a breakfast. Not for a VIP tour. Not for a luncheon. Specifically, in writing, for the White House state dinner evening activities.

“Nobody knows that and nobody has bothered to ask us about that, except for the Secret Service investigation.” (ANI)

‘Obama’s approach to India ruining close Bush-era ties’

US administration’s approach to India, including its “slow” response to the request for questioning David Headley, and its proximity to Pakistan in the war on terror are steadily driving a wedge in the strong relations cultivated during the Bush-era, noted historian Arthur Herman has observed.

In an opinion piece in the New York Post, widely regarded as a conservative publication, Herman wrote that India is still waiting to question LeT operative Headley, months after it emerged that he had a role in the Mumbai terror attack.

The author and historian also described the “cozy relationship” shared by the US and Pakistan as the second area of a rift in Indo-US relations.

“The partnership with India that George W Bush carefully built is in shambles — jeopardising our future in Asia,” the piece said.

“What the Pentagon and the media trumpet as Pakistan’s new ‘cooperation’ in fighting the Taliban, Indian experts see as simply one jihadist wing of Pakistan’s secret service (the ISI) surreptitiously taking out the others, with our Predator drones doing the shooting,” it added.

Herman is the author the bestseller How the Scots Invented the Modern World, and his most recent book is Gandhi and Churchill: The Epic Rivalry that Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age.

The author warned that the US should not make the “mistake of scorning India” like it did during the Cold War.

“Repeating that mistake will now hurt us and our ability to make our voice heard in that vital hemisphere,” he said, contending that the approach will drive India to its once close ally Russia.

The article noted that when Obama did not sell retired aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk to New Delhi, India bought a Russian carrier along with 16 nuclear reactors and a fleet of new MIG 29 fighters.

“The Russian deal means more than another lost opportunity for the United States — and another troubling expansion of Moscow’s influence in the region,” Herman wrote.

“It also represents a growing perception among Indian policymakers that they need to adjust to an Asia in which America plays little or no role, especially if the US economy buries itself under a mudslide of debt,” he added.

He notes that India fears Obama’s arming of Pakistan could lead to it lording it over other nations in the region, which could lead to more terror attacks.

It also suggests that New Delhi isn’t thrilled about Washington’s push for all nations to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

The author also recalled that India wasn’t too thrilled about Obama’s suggestion that China should try and mediate between New Delhi and Islamabad over Kashmir.

“As the Indian press noted at the time, nothing could be more calculated to arouse New Delhi’s wrath than the suggestion that not one but two erstwhile enemies should have a say in the fate of what is still sovereign Indian territory,” he said.

Afghan leaders distrust threatens American war strategy

Jalalabad (Afghanistan), May 13 (ANI): The success of the NATO offensive in the coming weeks in Kandahar, the Taliban heartland, may well depend on whether Afghans can overcome their corrosive distrust of President Hamid Karzai and his government, the New York Times reports.

According to the paper, Afghan elders met Tuesday at a Marine base near Marja in Helmand Province, as part of an American plan to build mutual trust.

But both Americans and Afghans have struggled to establish a local government that can win the loyalty of the Afghan people, something that is essential to keeping the Taliban at bay, it adds.

Karzai was confronted with that issue when he met with American officials this week, including President Obama on Wednesday.

Both leaders are seeking to repair months of badly strained relations.

The insurgency has spread to some new places, notably the north and northwest of the country, although it has diminished in a few areas. It is now made up of more than half a dozen groups with different agendas, making it that much harder to defeat, or negotiate with, even if the Americans and Afghans could agree on a strategy for doing so.

In 120 districts that the Pentagon views as critical to Afghanistan’s future stability, only a quarter of residents view the government positively. And the government has full control in fewer than a half dozen of these districts.

According to Nader Nadery of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, 18 months is simply not enough to have a stable and secure Afghan government in place.

The current strategy inevitably will allow insurgents some havens, as long as those are in sparsely populated areas where they are unlikely to have much impact.

A NATO officer said Colonel George said he hoped that if he could embolden Afghan citizens to combat corruption in the more populated river valleys and provincial towns in their areas, they would at least create a government they could support.

Diplomats who have spent years in the country working with Afghans give the Americans credit for trying, but they warn that it is easy to underestimate the complexity of Afghan tribal relationships and the profound antipathy for the government. (ANI)

‘Satisfied’ US now says Clinton’s Pak diatribe ‘misconstrued’ by media

Washington, May 11 (ANI): After an initial outburst against Pakistan following the botched Times Square bombing plot, the United States is apparently trying to water down its tough stand, with officials saying that Washington is ‘satisfied’ with Islamabad’s cooperation in the probe into the bombing plot.

“We”re very satisfied by the cooperation we”re getting on this particular investigation thus far,” State Department spokesman Philip Crowley told media persons during a press conference.

Richard Holbrooke, President Obama’s Special Envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan, also appeared to be in a ‘damage control’ mode following Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s stern warning to Pakistan.

Speaking during the press conference, Holbrooke said clarified that Clinton’s remarks were “misconstrued”

Clinton had warned Pakistan of facing ‘severe consequences’ in case extremists from its soil succeeded in attacking America.

“We think our relations with Pakistan have improved greatly in the last year.
Clinton herself praised the Pakistan government for what it has done. And so I urge you to not to react to a misrepresentation of what she said,” The News quoted Holbrooke, as saying.

He said the Obama Administration is actually multiplying Pakistan’s civilian and military aid, being deeply concerned over attempt of terror attack on the US. (ANI)

Times Square suspect’s radicalisation was gradual: US investigators

Washington, May 7 (ANI): American investigators have said that Times Square bombing suspect Faisal Shahzad’s radicalization was gradual, cumulative and largely self-contained, meaning that it did not involve typical catalysts such as direct contact with a radical cleric, a visible conversion to militant Islam or a significant setback in life.

The Washington Post quoted a senior U.S. intelligence official, as saying that Shahzad”s transition “was a gradual thing that started years ago.”

“It wasn”t suddenly, ”I found God, and this is the right path.” There is a combination of religion and anger,” he added.

The official noted that Shahzad had made at least a dozen return trips to Pakistan since arriving in the United States in 1999 and that the CIA”s campaign of Predator strikes and Pakistan”s recent military operations are focused on a part of the country very close to where Shahzad grew up.

Officials stressed that investigators are still struggling to come up with a cohesive account of how Shahzad evolved into a would-be terrorist, but that they are increasingly convinced that his accounts to interrogators, in particular his assertion that he was trained by the Pakistani Taliban, are on the mark.

“We have nothing that is contradictory to what he is telling us,” said a senior Obama administration official, adding that undisclosed new information from Shahzad”s interrogation “sheds some light” on his motivation.

“Obviously, we want to see if there are any links, especially recently,” to terrorist groups, said the official. (ANI)

FBI focusing on Pak Taliban role in failed Times Square attack

Washington, May 5 (ANI): Federal Bureau of Investigation sleuths have reportedly shifted the focus of their probe to the role of the Pakistani Taliban in the failed Times Square bombing.

Faisal Shahzad, a 30-year-old U.S. citizen arrested in connection with the incident, is said to have told FBI agents that he received bomb-making training in a region of Pakistan known as a militant hotbed.

According to the Washington Post, his reported confession, combined with a series of phone calls he received from Pakistan after purchasing the Nissan Pathfinder used in the attempted bombing, has led investigators to zero in on the Pakistani Taliban connection as “a leading theory,” a federal law enforcement official said.

“It”s a leading line of inquiry. There are only a few organizations in Pakistan that could provide training, and the Pakistani Taliban is . . . one that has an ax to grind with us,” the official told the paper on condition of anonymity.

The Pakistan Taliban has already claimed responsibility for Saturday night”s attempt, which investigators are reevaluating after initially downplaying the claim.

The incident has resurrected the controversy over the Obama administration”s handling of the attempted bombing of a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day.

Critics said the suspect in that case should have been placed in a military, rather than civilian, court.

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said, “It is clear that this was a terrorist plot aimed at murdering Americans in one of the busiest places in our country.”

Shahzad has been charged with attempting to detonate the sport-utility vehicle that was set ablaze on a tourist-crowded block in Midtown Manhattan and trying to kill bystanders and destroy property. (ANI)