Ahmadinejad says China-Iran ties unhurt by sanctions

(Reuters) – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said China’s support for the latest U.N. sanctions against it would not harm ties, but slammed Beijing along with other nuclear powers for wanting to monopolize the technology.

World | China

Ahmadinejad, speaking during a visit to China’s commercial capital of Shanghai on Friday, dismissed Wednesday’s resolution, triggered by a nuclear program the West believes is aimed at developing atomic weapons, as “a piece of worthless paper.”

Asked if Tehran was upset by China’s vote, he highlighted the strength of ties with a country that buys millions of barrels of Iranian crude each year, had opposed new restrictions for months and together with Russia watered down the package voted on.

“There is no reason to control or weaken the relationship (with China). The main problem is the United States,” he told a news conference after visiting the city’s flagship World Expo.

“The U.S. administration is abusing power in the (U.N.) Security Council in order to impose its hegemony on other nations,” the president said, speaking through a translator.

The resolution extended punitive measures against Iran over its protracted refusal to suspend sensitive uranium enrichment activity and open up to U.N. nuclear inspectors.

Ahmadinejad was in Shanghai to attend the Iran day at the ongoing World Expo, and both China and Iran said the visit was purely related to that event.

The president lavished praise on cultural ties and shared values and targeted most of his criticism at Washington, though China was included in a sweeping attack on the U.N. Security Council.

“Five members have the veto rights, nuclear bombs and nuclear energy in their company and they want to monopolize all this technology for themselves,” the president said.

The five permanent members, the only ones able to block resolutions, are the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France.

IAEA INSPECTORS CAN STAY

He said Iran would not suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) over the sanctions.

“There is no reason (for inspectors) to leave Iran. We have no problem with our peaceful nuclear program,” he said, adding that Iran would push ahead with making its own enriched uranium and sanctions would act only as a spur to developing technology.

He also thanked Brazil and Turkey, which have negotiated with Iran in recent months, for voting against the sanctions, saying their support signaled the formation of a “new front of independent countries.”

The latest resolution received the least support of four meted out against Iran since 2006.

A senior German legislator said earlier this week Turkey and Brazil made a “big mistake” by voting against the sanctions since this may have encouraged Tehran to think it was not isolated.

Ahmadinejad slammed U.S. policy as deceitful and misguided and said the country’s leader was naive about foreign affairs.

“Maybe he is very immature. I think Mr (Barack) Obama does not know the world very well,” he said, adding that the U.S. president was particularly in the dark about Iran and its people.

The U.S. Congress is expected to pass additional sanctions on Iran, possibly as early as this month, and European leaders may agree next week on the need for further restrictions.

(Additional reporting by Farah Master; Editing by Ben Blanchard)

Obama: U.N. sanctions “unmistakable message” to Iran

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama on Wednesday said fresh U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran send an “unmistakable message” to that country over its nuclear program.

Barack Obama

“This resolution will put in place the toughest sanctions ever faced by the Iranian government,” Obama said after the 15-nation council passed a fourth round of sanctions against Iran, which the West suspects of developing the means to build atom bombs.

“It sends an unmistakable message about the international community’s commitment to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons,” he told reporters at the White House.

The resolution followed five months of talks between the United States, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia.

With 12 votes in favor, it received the least support of the four Iran sanctions resolutions adopted since 2006, but Obama vowed to make them stick.

“We will ensure that these sanctions are vigorously enforced, just as we continue to refine and enforce our own sanctions on Iran,” he said.

“There is no double standard at play here. We’ve made it clear, time and again, that we respect Iran’s right, like all countries, to access peaceful nuclear energy,” Obama said.

(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Jackie Frank)

Obama: UN sanctions “unmistakable message” to Iran

WASHINGTON, June 9 (Reuters) – U.S. President Barack Obama on Wednesday said fresh U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran send an “unmistakable message” to that country over its nuclear program.

“This resolution will put in place the toughest sanctions ever faced by the Iranian government,” Obama said after the 15-nation council passed a fourth round of sanctions against Iran, which the West suspects of developing the means to build atom bombs.

“It sends an unmistakable message about the international community’s commitment to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons,” he told reporters at the White House.

The resolution followed five months of talks between the United States, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia.

With 12 votes in favor, it received the least support of the four Iran sanctions resolutions adopted since 2006, but Obama vowed to make them stick.

“We will ensure that these sanctions are vigorously enforced, just as we continue to refine and enforce our own sanctions on Iran,” he said.

“There is no double standard at play here. We’ve made it clear, time and again, that we respect Iran’s right, like all countries, to access peaceful nuclear energy,” Obama said.

(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Jackie Frank)

India leading research on Thorium: US official

India is the leading country in the research of Thorium, a naturally occurring radio active metal, a US official has said, even as the there is a distinct possibility of its use in nuclear reactors.

“Thorium is only used in an experimental and a research way, but in theory, it could be used for reactors.

I think the country that’s leading the research effort is India, actually, which has large amounts of thorium and so they’re very interested in it,” Warren P Miller the Assistant Secretary Energy (Nuclear) said.

In his testimony before the House Science and Technology Committee, Miller said in his personal opinion the uranium resource will not be a showstopper for nuclear energy.

“There’s also the Thorium possibility. Thorium is actually more prevalent in the crust than uranium is worldwide. There’s also the possibility of breeder reactors that would use much more of the uranium,” he said in response to a question.

Miller said there are quite a few studies about the uranium resource, and most estimates would argue with reasonable projections of the growth of nuclear energy throughout the world that there’s sufficient uranium resource at reasonable prices that would last throughout the rest of this century.

US keeping close watch on China’s offer to build nuke power plants in Pak

Washington, May 11 (ANI): Stressing that countries must respect their individual non-proliferation commitments, the United States has said that it is closely observing China’s offer to build two nuclear power plants in Pakistan.

Speaking during a forum at the Brookings Institution, US Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg said Washington is concerned about proliferation issues and is studying China’s offer to assist Pakistan with nuclear reactors, adding that Washington has not taken any final decision in this regard.

“The United States has not reached a final conclusion. But it”s something we”re obviously looking at very carefully,” The News quoted Steinberg, as saying.

“I think it”s important to scrupulously honour these non-proliferation commitments. We”ll want to continue to engage on the question, about whether this is permitted under the understandings of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),” he said in reply to a question.

China had earlier built two reactors for Pakistan. But in 2004 Beijing entered the Nuclear Suppliers Group, an association of nuclear energy states that forbids exports to nations lacking strict safeguards set up by the IAEA.

China began building a nuclear reactor in Chashma in Pakistan”s Punjab province in 1991 and work on a second reactor began in 2005, which is expected to be completed next year. Under the new agreement, Chinese companies will build at least two new 650-MW reactors at Chashma, a media report had said last month. (ANI)

Hundreds rally to stop nuclear dump

Indigenous groups and environmentalists are continuing a push to stop a radioactive waste dump being built on Muckaty Station in the Northern Territory.

More than 200 people gathered in Tennant Creek on the weekend to protest against the dump being built on the site north of the town.

Ngapa traditional owners from the station have signed a deal with the Federal Government for the nuclear waste dump.

Nat Wasley from the Beyond Nuclear Initiative says many Ngapa people and other surrounding Aboriginal clans are outraged the site is being considered by the Federal Government.

“There were a couple of senior men from the Ngapa group who not only attended the rally but got up and spoke at the rally and said that they don’t support the dump going ahead,” she said.

“They believe the other traditional owner groups weren’t adequately consulted by the Northern Land Council and they don’t support the dump going ahead, so that is very significant.”

Other Aboriginal clan elders have met lawyers in their fight to stop the waste dump being built on the site.

Ms Wasley says lawyers are now working for concerned traditional owners.

“They [lawyers] took evidence from senior traditional owners from all of the different groups and then have gone away now to think about the best strategies and ways forward,” she said.

“But [they] have been asked by the traditional owners to act from them, so officially have been asked to act and stop the dump and to hold the Federal Government and Northern Land Council accountable for their actions.”

Members of the Ngapa clan have also spoken out against the proposal and Ms Wasley says the rally proves local Indigenous groups are not happy.

“People from all of the different family groups of Muckaty were present,” she said.

“People spoke from the Ngapa group. Everybody who came unanimously were against the dump and that was very clear from the marching, the speeches and the people in the park.”

US undecided on offering India like nuclear deal to Pak

Islamabad, Mar.23 (ANI): Amid speculations that the US might offer Pakistan a civil nuclear deal similar to India during the upcoming strategic dialogue on March 24, the US embassy in Islamabad has rejected such reports, saying there are no negotiations on between the two countries on the issue.

“The US has not entered negotiations on a civil nuclear agreement with Pakistan. The United States is committed to helping Pakistan address its real and growing energy needs, and we look forward to cooperating with Pakistan in ways that are compatible with Pakistan’s economic, environmental and security needs and with US international commitments and policies,” a US Embassy spokesman told a private television channel.

Reports regarding the Obama Administration offering a India-like nuclear deal to Islamabad gained momentum after US Ambassador to Pakistan, in a interview with a newspaper, described the March 24 talks as “working level talks”, and hinted a change of heart on part of Washington.

“We are beginning to have a discussion with the Pakistan Government on the country’s desire to tap nuclear energy,” Patterson had said.

“Earlier on, non-proliferation concerns were quite severe. I think we are beginning to pass those and this is a scenario that we are going to explore,” she added.

India has already expressed concerns over reports regarding the White House’ overtures to Pakistan.

“America needs to take a holistic view on the US-Pak nuclear deal. The US should consider Pakistan’s track record before any deal,” External Affairs Minister SM Krishna had said referring to the history of Pakistan’s nuclear proliferation. (ANI)

US undecided on offering India like nuclear deal to Pak

Islamabad, Mar.23 (ANI): Amid speculations that the US might offer Pakistan a civil nuclear deal similar to India during the upcoming strategic dialogue on March 24, the US embassy in Islamabad has rejected such reports, saying there are no negotiations on between the two countries on the issue.

“The US has not entered negotiations on a civil nuclear agreement with Pakistan. The United States is committed to helping Pakistan address its real and growing energy needs, and we look forward to cooperating with Pakistan in ways that are compatible with Pakistan’s economic, environmental and security needs and with US international commitments and policies,” a US Embassy spokesman told a private television channel.

Reports regarding the Obama Administration offering a India-like nuclear deal to Islamabad gained momentum after US Ambassador to Pakistan, in a interview with a newspaper, described the March 24 talks as “working level talks”, and hinted a change of heart on part of Washington.

“We are beginning to have a discussion with the Pakistan Government on the country’s desire to tap nuclear energy,” Patterson had said.

“Earlier on, non-proliferation concerns were quite severe. I think we are beginning to pass those and this is a scenario that we are going to explore,” she added.

India has already expressed concerns over reports regarding the White House’ overtures to Pakistan.

“America needs to take a holistic view on the US-Pak nuclear deal. The US should consider Pakistan’s track record before any deal,” External Affairs Minister SM Krishna had said referring to the history of Pakistan’s nuclear proliferation. (ANI)

Russia to build 12 reactors in India

Russian officials say they will build at least 12 nuclear reactors for power stations in India, as prime minister Vladimir Putin visited India to reaffirm decades-old ties.

Russia is competing with French and American firms for lucrative contracts to build nuclear power plants for energy-hungry India, as Asia’s third-largest economy needs to boost its supply to help sustain rapid economic growth.

“So far it is clear that it will be 12 [reactors], and this is not the final figure,” said Sergei Kiriyenko, the head of Russia’s state nuclear corporation.

He added that six reactors would be built between 2012 and 2017.

Mr Putin pledged on Friday to boost banking and technology cooperation with India, seeking to bolster ties with a Cold War ally that has been shifting focus towards the United States.

Russia wants to boost trade with India to $US20 billion ($21 billion) by 2015 from the current $US8 billion.

Together with China and Brazil, Russia and India make up the so-called BRIC group of major emerging economies, whose global influence is rising.

The two nations also seek a greater role in stabilising the region because both share security interests emanating from Islamist militant violence and the war in Afghanistan.

“India is our strategic partner … which is an evidence that our geopolitical interests almost fully coincide,” Mr Putin told a conference with businessmen in the Indian capital New Delhi.

Setting the tone for his one-day visit – mainly aimed at keeping one of the world’s biggest arms importers interested in Russian weapons – Mr Putin offered state financial aid for the Indian telecoms unit of a Russian conglomerate.

Mr Putin also vowed to remove hurdles in the banking sector that he said were hampering mutual trade, and signalled that the government was ready to encourage joint ventures and acquisitions in the sector.

- Reuters

China has backed Pakistan’s ‘right’ to nuclear energy: Babar

Islamabad, Aug.26 (ANI): China has backed Pakistan’s right to nuclear energy to overcome the huge energy crisis facing the country currently, Presidential spokesperson Farhatullah Babar has said.

Babar said during his meeting President Asif Ali Zardari, Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi highlighted that Pakistan needed nuclear energy to address its increasing energy needs.

“We would appeal to the world community to understand Pakistan’s requirements in this regard,” Babar quoted Jiechi as saying.

Babar said several memoranda of understanding (MoU) for cooperation in the fields of education, fisheries, agriculture, dams and investment have been signed between Pakistan and China during Zardari’s Beijing visit.

Babar said the highlight of Zardari’s visit was signing of an agreement regarding the construction of a hydro power plant at Bunji in the Northern Areas.

He said the project is based on ‘Built, Operate and Transfer’ (BOT) strategy, according to which all investment would be made by China.

Once completed, the project will generate 7,000 megawatts of electricity, The Daily Times reports. (ANI)

Ahmadinejad proposes face-to-face debate with Obama at UN

Washington, May 26 (ANI): Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has proposed a face-to-face debate with US President Barack Obama at the United Nations (UN), in the case he’s re-elected next month as Iran’s president.

According to a report by CBS News, Ahmadinejad’s offer of a debate to Obama could be campaign posturing before the June 12 vote.

But, it does put Ahmadinejad on record as supporting a potentially groundbreaking encounter following Obama’s offer for dialogue.

Obama has urged a “serious process of engagement” after Iran’s elections in an effort to end a nearly 30-year diplomatic chill.

Ahmadinejad said that, if re-elected, he would be open to “debate global issues as well as world peace and security” during the U.N. General Assembly in September.

There was no immediate reaction from Washington.

Ahmadinejad has often denounced the West for trying to pressure Iran to give up it uranium enrichment program, a process that can produce fuel for both nuclear energy and nuclear weapons.

Tehran insists it is only to fuel peaceful reactors, but the West worries could lead to nuclear weapons development.

His latest comments appear to be part of a campaign strategy to portray himself as the only candidate capable to defending Iran’s nuclear technology. (ANI)

Patil pitches for healthy growth in India-Poland trade

Warsaw (Poland), Apr.24 (ANI): Having paid tribute to the patriotism and bravery of the Polish people at the Warsaw Uprising Museum here on Thursday, visiting Indian President Pratibha Devisingh Patil on Friday pitched for a healthy growth in Indo-Polish trade notwithstanding the current global economic downturn.

Recalling that the partnership between India and Poland has been built on the foundation of mutual respect, Patil said: “The two countries have strong foundations of democracy and enterprise.”

“We appreciate Poland’s achievements in recent years, especially after it joined the European Union. India has also enjoyed a sustained partnership with the EU over several decades that was upgraded to a strategic level in 2004,” she added.

Patil also praised the cooperation between the two countries in the United Nations and other international fora on issues such as climate change and terrorism. She thanked the Government of Poland for extending support to the India-specific waiver on the US-India civil nuclear cooperation deal at the two meetings of the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) in August and September 2008. This, she said, would help India to harness its civil nuclear energy.By Ravindra Singh Robin (ANI)

IAEA chief calls for dialogue on North Korea nuclear issue

Beijing, April 20 (Xinhua) International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Mohamed ElBaradei Monday called for dialogue to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue.

‘The only way to resolve the issues is through dialogue,’ ElBaradei told reporters at a conference on nuclear energy in Beijing. ‘There is no other solution apart from dialogue.’

He said dialogue should be conducted through the United Nations Security Council to resolve such issues in Iran, North Korea and Cuba, instead of ‘flexing muscles’.

North Korea last Tuesday asked IAEA inspectors to stop work and leave the country as soon as possible, a day after the Security Council condemned the North Korea’s April 5 ‘rocket’ launch. The country claimed it was a satellite launch while US, Japan and South Korea viewed it as a front for testing ballistic missile technology.

ElBaradei said he hoped IAEA would be allowed to resume work in the country.
Indo Asian News Service

UN agency warns of nuclear “vulnerabilities”

Beijing – The UN’s international nuclear watchdog warned Monday of ageing nuclear facilities and a lack of oversight of nuclear installations.

Mohamed ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said at the opening of a two-day conference on nuclear energy in Beijing that security at nuclear reactors was much better today than 10 years ago “but we still have vulnerabilities in safety as well as in security, even in countries with significant nuclear programmes.”

“In some countries, we see a troubling combination of old reactors, operators which are poorly managed or underfunded, and weak regulators,” ElBaradei warned.

The interest in using nuclear energy is growing worldwide with more than 60 countries, primarily developing nations, informing the IAEA that they are interested in developing their own nuclear programmes, he said.

The reasons for the higher interest in atomic energy is shrinking oil reserves, large price fluctuations for gas and oil, concerns about global warming and rising energy demand, he said at the meeting which energy ministers and other representatives from 65 countries are attending.

IAEA says dialogue only way forward for North Korea

BEIJING (Reuters) – International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei on Monday called for new dialogue to solve the diplomatic stand-off with North Korea, adding that he hopes the six-party talks will resume and the IAEA will be allowed back into the country.

“There is no other solution apart from dialogue,” ElBaradei said at a conference on nuclear energy in Beijing. “The only way to resolve these issues is not through flexing muscles … but to try to engage the root causes.”

Monitors from the IAEA, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, left North Korea on Thursday after being ordered out by Pyongyang, which has raised regional tensions by saying it will abandon atomic disarmament talks and restart an aged nuclear complex it had agreed to shut in an aid-for-disarmament deal.

The U.N. Security Council unanimously condemned North Korea’s launch of a long-range rocket on April 5, saying the action contravened a U.N. ban.

North Korea has said it will revive all its facilities at its Soviet-era Yongbyon nuclear complex, including a reprocessing plant that makes plutonium which can be used for nuclear weapons.

Pyongyang began taking apart the Yongbyon plant more than a year ago as a part of a deal reached in so called six-party talks with China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States. IAEA inspectors were invited to monitor the moribund plant.

India a partner in Obama’s N-efforts?

IF US President Barack Obama is serious about reducing nuclear weapons, putting in place a global nuclear test ban and ending the production of fissile material to produce more nuclear weapons, then India will necessarily be in the frontline of such efforts. Speaking in Prague, Obama said, ” and #8230;I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons and #8230;” “To put an end to Cold War thinking, we will reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy and #8230; we will negotiate a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with the Russians this year.

” The US President also said his administration would “immediately and aggressively” pursue the ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which was rejected by the US Senate in 1999. India, which has still to sign and ratify the CTBT, having acquired de facto nuclear weapon status in 1998, would have little choice but to sign the Treaty if the Senate ratifies it.

“I don’t see why today’s India should object to signing the Treaty if the US and China ratify it,” Arundhati Ghose, former Indian ambassador and arms control expert, told HT. Ghose, however, was skeptical about Obama’s efforts to reduce global nuclear weapons. “I think he’s forgotten that the (presidential) campaign is over.

He is President of the US, which is in dire straits,” she argued. Another key area of interest is a new treaty to end the production of fissile material.

“If we are serious about stopping the spread of these weapons, then we should put an end to the dedicated production of weapons-grade materials that create them,” Obama said. “The basic bargain is sound: Countries with nuclear weapons will move towards disarmament, countries without nuclear weapons will not acquire them, and all countries can access peaceful nuclear energy.

,” he underlined. Radha Kumar, trustee at the Delhi Policy Group, said the world would have to deal with the issue of unequal levels of fissile material in the possession of nuclear weapon states.

On CTBT, Kumar said: “The logic is there for India to sign CTBT. But it remains to be seen what government takes power in Delhi.”.

Parliament’s nod will be mandatory for international agreements: BJP

New Delhi, April 3 (IANS) Describing the Indo-US nuclear deal as done in ‘regrettable secrecy’ by the Congress-led UPA, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) said if voted to power it would bring in a constitutional amendment to make parliamentary approval mandatory before the government signs any international agreement that concerns strategic programmes, territorial integrity and economic interests.

In its party manifesto, released here Friday, the BJP said: ‘In view of the uncalled for and regrettable secrecy with which the Congress and the prime minister dealt with the India-US nuclear deal, the BJP proposes to introduce an amendment to the constitution to make it mandatory for government to seek parliament’s approval/ratification by two-thirds majority before signing any bilateral or multilateral agreement that impinges on India’s strategic programmes, territorial integrity and economic interest.’

It said the country needs nuclear energy, ‘but not at the cost of our national strategic interests. The Congress has fooled the people of India by selling the over-hyped India-US Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement as an absolute necessity and how it will help light up people’s homes.’

The UPA government had signed the deal by ‘suppressing two crucial facts’, it said. First, the government ‘did not make the smallest effort to tap India’s own nuclear fuel supplies’, and second, nuclear power is ‘tremendously expensive and not affordable for the aam admi’.

‘The India-US nuclear deal, in the final analysis, is not about empowering India but disempowering India by making us dependent on American supplies and tying us to discriminatory regimes from which Pakistan is free.

‘The BJP believes that India’s strategic nuclear programme has been deeply compromised by the Congress. The gains of Pokhran-II and subsequent development have been frittered away for gains that have accrued to those who wish to see India’s nuclear programme to be contained, rolled back and eventually dismantled.’

The BJP promised to ‘reverse this drift’.

It said India’s indigenous thorium technology programme will be expedited and given financial assistance, ‘correcting the grievous wrong done by the UPA government’.

It said if voted to power, the BJP will honour India’s commitments to prevent proliferation. ‘But it will pursue an independent nuclear policy based on the following:

1. All options will be kept open and all steps will be taken that are necessary for the

technological advancement of India’s civil and military nuclear programmes.

2. Maintain a credible minimum deterrent that is in tune with changing realities.

3. Seek cross-party consensus before agreeing to any control regime, including CTBT,

FMCR and MTCR.’

BJP for parliamentary approval for international agreements

New Delhi, April 3 (IANS) Parliamentary approval should be made mandatory before the government signs any international agreement that concerns strategic programmes, territorial integrity and economic interests, the Bharatiya Janata Party ahs advocated.

The Indo-US nuclear deal was done in ‘regrettable secrecy’ by the Congress-led UPA, the BJP Friday said.

The party manifesto, released here Friday, said: ‘In view of the uncalled for and regrettable secrecy with which the Congress and the prime minister dealt with the India-US nuclear deal, the BJP proposes to introduce an amendment to the constitution to make it mandatory for government to seek parliament’s approval/ratification by two-thirds majority before signing any bilateral or multilateral agreement that impinges on India’s strategic programmes, territorial integrity and economic interest.’

It said the country needs nuclear energy, ‘but not at the cost of our national strategic interests. The Congress has fooled the people of India by selling the over-hyped India-US Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement as an absolute necessity and how it will help light up people’s homes.’

It said the UPA government had signed the deal by ‘suppressing two crucial facts’. First, the government ‘did not make the smallest effort to tap India’s own nuclear fuel supplies’, and second, nuclear power is ‘tremendously expensive and not affordable for the aam admi’, it said.

‘The India-US nuclear deal, in the final analysis, is not about empowering India but disempowering India by making us dependent on American supplies and tying us to discriminatory regimes from which Pakistan is free.

‘The BJP believes that India’s strategic nuclear programme has been deeply compromised by the Congress. The gains of Pokhran-II and subsequent development have been frittered away for gains that have accrued to those who wish to see India’s nuclear programme to be contained, rolled back and eventually dismantled.’

The BJP promised to ‘reverse this drift’.

It said India’s indigenous thorium technology programme will be expedited and given financial assistance, ‘correcting the grievous wrong done by the UPA government’.

It said if voted to power, the BJP will honour India’s commitments to prevent proliferation. ‘But it will pursue an independent nuclear policy based on the following:

1. All options will be kept open and all steps will be taken that are necessary for the

technological advancement of India’s civil and military nuclear programmes.

2. Maintain a credible minimum deterrent that is in tune with changing realities.

3. Seek cross-party consensus before agreeing to any control regime, including CTBT,

FMCR and MTCR.’

Obama extends sanctions on Iran for another year

Washington, Mar.13 (ANI): Expressing its fears that Iran’s nuclear program is a cover to build atomic weapons, the Obama administration has extended sanctions imposed on that country for one more year.

Tehran claims that it is enriching uranium to produce nuclear energy for civilian purposes.

Citing a continued “unusual and extraordinary threat to U.S. national security,” President Obama on Thursday extended sanctions against Iran for one year in a public notice, reports Fox News.

It is unclear how Iran will respond to the move. The United States severed diplomatic ties with Iran during the hostage crisis nearly 30 years ago at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, but Obama has signaled a willingness to pursue a dialogue with the country, particularly over its nuclear program.

The policy affirmed by Obama on Thursday began with an executive order by President Clinton on March 15, 1995. Since then, the White House has renewed it every year. (ANI)

Iran backs nuclear energy for peaceful means

New Delhi, Feb 10 (ANI): Iran has said it retains the right to use nuclear energy for peaceful power generation.

Talking to reporters here on Monday, Iran’s Ambassador to India, Seyed Mehdi Nabizadeh, said any country had the right to develop energy sources.
“We have been trying our best for the development and progressive of the knowledge and technology. It has come from figure at time that we have been able to show Nano technology, bio technology as well esteem stem cell and technology of the neo energy wind as well as solar system and nuclear energy that we have been just going ahead,” Nabizadeh said.
Western powers said on Saturday that Iran risked isolation and more sanctions if it did not comply with demands to rein in its nuclear programme.

The U.N. Security Council has imposed three rounds of sanctions on Iran for refusing to suspend uranium enrichment. Western powers suspect the work is aimed at building an atomic bomb. Tehran says it is for peaceful power generation only.

Referring to attacks in Mumbai late last year in which nearly 200 people were killed, Nabizadeh said countries nurturing terrorist had a responsibility to rein them. (ANI)