UK sets limit of 225 on nuclear warhead stockpile

Britain announced for the first time on Wednesday that it had set a limit on its nuclear weapons stockpile, at 225 warheads, and said it would re-examine its policy on using nuclear weapons.

Britain’s new Conservative-Liberal Democrat government said the announcement, timed to coincide with a U.N. nuclear non-proliferation conference in New York, was intended to build trust between nuclear and non-nuclear weapons states and to contribute to worldwide nuclear arms reduction efforts.

Britain had until now disclosed only the number of operationally available nuclear warheads for its Trident missile-armed submarine fleet, and had given no figure for the overall stockpile.

“In the future our overall stockpile will not exceed 225 nuclear warheads,” Foreign Secretary William Hague told parliament.

The ceiling on operationally available warheads would stay at 160, he said. The extra warheads allow for “processing, maintenance and logistic management”, officials said.

Hague said the new government would review Britain’s policy on when it would consider using nuclear weapons as part of a defence and security review launched by the new government, which took office after the May 6 election.

Britain had long said it would consider using nuclear weapons only in “extreme circumstances” of self-defence, including the defence of NATO allies, but had been deliberately ambiguous over the precise circumstances of use, he said.

POLICY REVIEW

“The time is right to look again at our policy as the U.S. has done,” Hague said, making clear his government remained committed to maintaining a “credible minimum nuclear deterrent”.

President Barack Obama last month unveiled a new policy restricting U.S. use of nuclear weapons.

Britain and other nuclear weapons states are trying to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons to countries such as Iran. Those countries often argue that established nuclear powers are doing nothing to reduce their arsenals as the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) urges.

Professor Malcolm Chalmers of the Royal United Services Institute thinktank said Hague’s disclosure “brings the UK into line with what the U.S. and France have already done”.

“The wider significance is that the Western powers want, as part of their contribution to the nuclear disarmament process, to get all the nuclear weapons states to be more transparent, including Russia and China,” he said.

The United States disclosed for the first time this month the size of its nuclear arsenal, saying it had 5,113 warheads.

In 2008, France said it would leave its submarine missile arsenal in place while cutting its stock of air-launched weapons by a third to around 290 warheads.

China and Russia have not revealed their total number of warheads, although Moscow and Washington recently agreed to limit operationally deployed nuclear warheads to 1,550.

Hague’s announcement may ease strains within Britain’s new coalition government over a decision to spend billions of pounds on updating Britain’s nuclear deterrent at a time when the country needs to cut a huge budget deficit.

The centre-right Conservatives support plans to build a new nuclear-armed submarine fleet. The centre-left Lib Dems, the junior coalition partner, wanted to look at cheaper alternatives but have agreed to opt out of any vote on the issue.

Britain has the smallest arsenal of the five legally recognised nuclear weapons states — the United States, Russia, China and France. The previous Labour government said it could consider reducing Britain’s warheads further as part of a multilateral negotiation.

(Editing by David Stamp)

US should conduct ‘offshore’ strikes on Afghanistan

Washington, Sep.2 (ANI): A leading conservative columnist, George Will, has called on the Obama administration to pull American troops out of Afghanistan, and instead focus on fighting from “offshore” by means of “intelligence, drones, cruise missiles, air strikes and small, potent Special Forces units.”

According to the Washington Post, there seems to be some merit in waging an “offshore” war, given the success that has been achieved in neighbouring Pakistan against the Taliban with the help of Predator drone strikes, minimum troop deployment and contractors. The acknowledged U.S. toll: zero dead. That’s in stark contrast to the 813 Americans killed so far in Afghanistan.

Obama faces a key decision in coming weeks on Afghanistan. He has already sent 21,000 additional troops there this year, boosting the U.S. total there to 68,000, along with some 40,000 NATO allies.

US commander in Afghanistan General Stanley McChrystal is likely to ask him for more – most likely 10,000 to 20,000 – just as the President wrestles with health-care reform and a still-feeble economy.

Stephen Biddle of the Council on Foreign Relations, who has been advising General McChrystal, says that drones don’t work everywhere. They can be easily shot down by even a “third-rate air force,” he says.

He also says using drones to eliminate enemy personnel needs good intelligence from sources on the ground, something that would melt away should the Taliban reclaim power.

Biddle isn’t overly concerned about Afghanistan falling, again, into the hands of the Taliban. But he is concerned about its nuclear-armed neighbor.

“At some level, the loss of Afghanistan could be tolerated,” he says. “There’s nothing especially unique about Afghanistan as a haven for striking the U.S. Yemen, Djibouti or Somalia could play that role – there are lots of ill-governed spaces around the world that could. But Afghanistan is unique in its proximity to Pakistan, and its potential role in destabilizing Pakistan if Kabul falls under a Taliban government,” he says.

Andrew Bacevich, a retired Army colonel, says the drone strikes are paying off in Pakistan because of that nation’s “quasi-legitimate government and reasonably effective army” – neither of which Afghanistan has.

But he does call the war “misguided and unnecessary,” and argues the U.S. should work with the country’s tribal chiefs to ensure stability in their respective valleys.

And offshore spy-and-strike capabilities could, at a minimum, keep al-Qaeda off-balance in the region “and optimally destroy whatever entity is engaged in a plot,” Bacevich says. (ANI)

AFPAK policy has NATO’s backing: Obama

Washington, Apr.12 (ANI): US President Barack Obama has said that the revamped policy for Pakistan and Afghanistan is positively backed by all the US NATO allies.

Reffering to his last week’s meeting with the NATO allies in Strasbourg, Obama said all the ally countries has shown their unity for the new policies.

“It was heartening that our NATO allies united in Strasbourg behind our strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and contributed important resources to support our effort there,” Obama said.

Obama, in his regular radio address, urged all the countries to fill the gap of distrust among them, and fight together against extremism, nuclear proliferation, and economic crisis.

“These are challenges that no single nation, no matter how powerful, can confront alone.We can’t afford to let walls of mistrust stand. Instead, we have to find and build on, our mutual interests,” Dawn quoted Obama, as saying.

“We live in a dangerous world, and we must be strong and vigilant in the face of these threats,” he added. (ANI)

Top US envoy, military chief arrive in Afghanistan

Kabul – The top US envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan arrived in Kabul to hold talks with Afghan and NATO military officials, a US embassy spokesperson said Sunday.

Ambassador Richard Holbrooke was accompanied by the US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen. Both officials were vital in drafting a strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan that US President Barack Obama announced late last month.

The new strategy is aimed at disrupting and defeating Taliban and al-Qaeda militants, who are suspected of having command bases inside Pakistani tribal areas.

The visit came one day after President Obama said in Strasbourg, France that NATO allies had pledged 3,000 non-combat soldiers to protect the Afghan presidential elections slated for August 20.

Obama said NATO also pledged to deploy 300 new police trainers, 70 embedded training teams for the Afghan army and provide 600 million dollars for the army and for civilian reconstruction.

Taliban militants, who were initially believed to have been defeated following the ouster of their ultra-Islamic regime in late 2001, have steadily gained strength in the past three years.

The insurgents extended their writ to larger swathes of the country and stepped up their attacks on the allied forces that resulted in deaths of nearly 300 international troops and about 1,500 Afghan security forces in 2008 alone.

To contain the insurgency, the US government plans to send 17,000 additional combat soldiers and 4,000 military trainers this year. The total number of international troops deployed from 42 nations to the country is expected to reach 90,000, mostly from the US.

Holbrooke and Mullen were expected to brief the Afghan and US military leaders on details of the new strategy

Obama seeks more European help in Afghanistan

the United States win the war in Afghanistan, seeking to use his huge public popularity here to wring concessions from NATO allies.

Greeted by crowds as a hero on his first trip to Europe as president, Obama warned its leaders and students at a meeting in the French city of Strasbourg that Europe faced a bigger threat from al Qaeda than the United States for geographical reasons.

“Europe should not simply expect the United States to shoulder that burden alone,” he said of Afghanistan, looking to drum up support for his new strategy in the war.

“This is a joint problem that requires a joint effort,” he said, before attending a dinner with leaders of the 28 NATO member states at a summit marking the military alliance’s 60th anniversary in Strasbourg and nearby Baden-Baden in Germany.

Despite his popularity with many Europeans, police battled anti-NATO demonstrators with water cannon and teargas on the outskirts of Strasbourg to prevent them reaching the city centre. About 300 protesters were also arrested on Thursday.

A disagreement between Turkey and its European allies over who should be the next head of NATO also soured the mood, with Ankara resisting calls for Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen to replace the outgoing secretary-general.

Turkey is unhappy with Rasmussen’s handling of a 2006 row over cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad that caused riots in the Muslim world and NATO sources said discussions on the issue would continue on Saturday after no consensus had been found.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel had earlier come out openly in favour of Rasmussen and had hoped for a decision on Friday.

PRESSURE OVER AFGAHNISTAN

Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy each met Obama before the summit, but despite warm endorsements, they gave no indication they would send more soldiers to Afghanistan.

Britain said it would consider dispatching extra forces to help out during Afghanistan’s August presidential election.

The United States has 38,000 troops in Afghanistan, more than all the other national contingents put together. Obama has said he will add an extra 17,000 combat troops as well as 4,000 others to help train Afghan officials.

European leaders are reluctant to send more of their own soldiers to a war that is unpopular with voters, preferring to focus their energies on reconstruction and development.

Unlike his predecessor George W. Bush, who was deeply unpopular in Europe and whose administration sometimes bullied allies publicly to bolster their contributions in Afghanistan, Obama struck a more conciliatory tone.

“I understand that after a long campaign in Afghanistan people can feel weary of war, even a war that is just,” he told reporters at a joint news conference with Merkel.

But he also delivered a clear message, saying he expected Germany would be “stepping up to the plate” and warning of the al Qaeda threat to Europe.

Obama’s Afghan plan aims to get a grip on rising violence by Taliban militants driven from power in 2001 but never completely defeated, broadening the focus to Pakistan and putting the highest priority on the defeat of al Qaeda militants.

He said on Friday he did not expect NATO troops would operate in Pakistan, easing fears of an expansion in the war.

CHEERING CROWDS

Obama was greeted by cheering crowds when he arrived in the Strasbourg in eastern France, fresh from his economic diplomacy at the G20 summit in Britain, and was also feted later when he travelled the short distance across the border to Germany.

The NATO summit will be packed with symbolism aimed at celebrating an alliance created to defend Europe’s borders.

Obama warned that although NATO’s old adversary, the Soviet Union, had gone, the threat of nuclear catastrophe remained.

“Even with the Cold War over, the spread of nuclear weapons or the theft of nuclear material could lead to the extermination of any city on the planet,” he told the town hall meeting.

He said he would set out an agenda to seek a world without nuclear weapons at an EU-U.S. summit in Prague on Sunday.

The NATO summit will initially focus on often difficult relations with Moscow, with Obama saying the West needed engage Russia while acknowledging they had “some core disagreements”.

Pakistan, Afghanistan welcome Obama’s new policy

Washington, March 27 (ANI): Pakistan and Afghanistan have hailed the US President Barack Obama’s new plans to root out extremists. Both the countries have pledged to extend cooperation to the U.S in this endeavour.

Pakistan’s Ambassador to Washington, Husain Haqqani, on Friday said it was an “extraordinarily positive” sign that Obama was re-examining US policy in the region.

Haqqani said Pakistan was “especially pleased” about Obama’s personal commitment to “reinvigorating our common efforts to contain terrorism and extremism.”

“It bodes well not only for a stronger regional approach to a clearly regional problem, but to a more mature bilateral relationship between the United States and Pakistan,” Haqqani said.

Meanwhile, Afghanistan Ambassador to Washington, Said Jawad, said Kabul was “very grateful” to the Obama administration for “this new strategy for victory.”

“The Afghan government is committed to working with the US and our allies to implement this strategy,” Jawad said in a statement while adding: “We ask our NATO allies, major donors and the friends of Afghanistan to collaborate with the strategy’s implementation by providing the resources it will need.”

Jawad praised Obama for drafting a “comprehensive” strategy with “input and insights of diverse voices.”

Earlier, Obama ordered 4,000 extra troops and a major boost in the civilian presence in Afghanistan, vowing to “disrupt, dismantle, and defeat” the Al-Qaeda extremist network.

Obama also pledged a major effort, including through a spike in economic assistance, to bring stability to Pakistan, warning that its Afghan border regions had turned into “the most dangerous place in the world.” (ANI)

Obama warns of Al-Qaeda’s plans to attack US from Pakistan

Washington, March 27 (ANI): The U.S. President Barack Obama on Friday said Al-Qaeda is ‘actively planning’ attacks on US from safe havens in Pakistan.

President Obama reminded the citizens of America that the U.S goal is to disrupt, dismantle and defeat Al-Qaida in Afghanistan and Pakistan and warned that the situation in Afghanistan is increasingly perilous.

“I want the American people to understand that we have a clear and focused goal: to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat Al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan and to prevent their return to either country in the future,” said Obama.

“That is the goal that must be achieved. That is a cause that could not be more just. And to the terrorists who oppose us, my message is the same: we will defeat you, ” Obama added.

“Attacks against our troops, our NATO allies, and the Afghan government have risen steadily. Most painfully, 2008 was the deadliest year of the war for American forces,” Obama informed.

Unfolding a new US strategy to defeat Taliban and Al-Qaeda, Obama said Pakistan must be ‘stronger partner’ in destroying Al-Qaeda safe havens.

Obama said Pakistan would be provided financial assistance of 1.5 billion dollars each year for next five years. However, the US would not provide a blank cheque to Pakistan “as they also needed to prove their commitment in war against terror.”

However, on Afghanistan, Obama said US will not turn blind eye to Afghan government corruption.

The US President proposed setting up a new contact group on Afghanistan including Iran to tackle the bloody Taliban and Al-Qaeda insurgency. (ANI)

US critical of Spanish withdrawal from Kosovo

Washington – The United States criticized Spain for its decision Friday to end its role in the NATO peacekeeping force in Kosovo, calling it a disappointment that breaks with an alliance agreement.

The Spanish government announced that it would pull out its 620 soldiers who are part of NATO’s 15,500-strong contingency in Kosovo, which declared independence last year but was not recognized by Madrid.

“We are deeply disappointed by this decision taken by Spain,” State Department spokesman Robert Wood said. “If you recall, in 1999, NATO allies agreed on the principle of in together, out together. And so we were surprised by this decision.”

NATO forces intervened to stop an a Serbian military campaign in its former province against breakaway ethnic Albanians. The United States and most EU countries quickly recognized Kosovo’s independence.

Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero defended the decision, saying Spain could not logically keep soldiers there if it did not recognize Kosovo’s independence. Spain for decades has had to cope with a separatist movement in the Basque region.

US relations with Spain were strained when Zapatero pulled Spanish troops out of Iraq after winning the 2004 election. (dpa)

Biden discusses Afghanistan with NATO allies

Brussels – US Vice President Joe Biden was Tuesday holding talks in Brussels with the chief of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and with European ambassadors to NATO on how to step up the alliance’s efforts in Afghanistan.

The talks come just five days after US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton visited the NATO headquarters, suggesting the new US administration was keen to re-engage with its European allies as it struggles to defeat the Taliban insurgency.

US President Barack Obama has announced the deployment of an additional 17,000 soldiers to Afghanistan, and the US administration has made it clear that it wants allies to increase their commitment to the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).

At the same time, Washington has moved to allay the concerns of those Europeans that are reluctant to send more troops to combat zones by suggesting that further efforts on the civilian side would be equally welcomed.

Other likely topics for discussion in Brussels concern the increasingly unstable situation in Pakistan and possible talks by international forces with moderate Taliban in Afghanistan, diplomats said.

Tuesday’s visit comes less than a month before NATO is due to hold its summit in Strasbourg and in the German town of Kehl.

Biden was later due to meet European Union officials. (dpa)

US determined to stabilize Pak-Afghan region: Clinton

Washington, Mar.9 (ANI): US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has vowed to stabilize Pakistan and Afghanistan by putting forth a comprehensive policy

“We will be working with our NATO allies and other partners to come up with a comprehensive strategy that integrates military and civilian assets in a way that can try to stabilise both Afghanistan and Pakistan from the mutual threat they face from Al Qaeda and the Taliban,” The Daily Times quoted Clinton, as saying.

According to a US State Department statement released here, Clinton viewed the extremist outfits as being determined to spread havoc in the region.

She said the Obama administration has pledged to end the problem.

The statement was issued after Clinton, who is on a European tour, met members of the 26-nation NATO alliance on formulating an effective strategy for Afghanistan in Brussels. (ANI)

National security team gives grim appraisal of Afghanistan War

Munich (Germany), Feb.9 (ANI): President Barack Obama’s national security team has given a dire assessment of the war in Afghanistan, with one official calling it a challenge “much tougher than Iraq” and others hinting that it could take years to turn around.
U.S. officials said more troops were urgently needed, both from America and its NATO allies, to counter the increasing strength of the Taliban and warlords opposed to the central government in Kabul.

According to the Washington Post, they also said new approaches were needed to untangle an inefficient and conflicting array of civilian-aid programs that have wasted billions of dollars.
General David H. Petraeus, head of the U.S. Central Command, said the war in Afghanistan “has deteriorated markedly in the past two years” and warned of a “downward spiral of security.”

In addition to more combat troops, Petraeus called for “a surge in civilian capacity” to help rebuild villages, train local police forces, tackle corruption in the Afghan government and reduce the country’s thriving opium trade.

He also suggested that the odds of success were low, given that foreign military powers have historically met with defeat in Afghanistan.

“Afghanistan has been known over the years as the graveyard of empires,” he said. “We cannot take that history lightly.”

The White House is conducting a strategic review of the war in Afghanistan and says it will unveil the results before NATO holds a 60th-anniversary summit in early April.

Obama administration officials have said they expect to send 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, bringing the total U.S. deployment there to about 66,000. U.S. allies have a combined 32,000 troops in Afghanistan operating under NATO command. (ANI)