U.S. to send stern message to North Korea

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama’s top diplomat and defense chief head to Seoul this week to discuss ways to respond to North Korea and deter it from any future attack after the sinking of a South Korean warship.

But the high-profile visit by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates risks angering China in the process, with an expected announcement of U.S.-South Korean military exercises that have set off alarms in Beijing.

Tension between North and South Korea remain high following the March sinking of the warship, Cheonan, killing 46 South Korean sailors. Pyongyang has denied responsibility and escaped censure this month from the United Nations, which condemned the attack but, in deference to China, did not blame North Korea.

Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell said the talks in Seoul were aimed at assessing the next steps with North Korea, including whether and how to resume stalled talks about Pyongyang’s nuclear program. Pyongyang said this month it was willing to return to disarmament talks, in limbo since 2007.

“The United States is considering a variety of options associated with North Korea and we will be in deep consultations,” Campbell said.

But he stressed that an essential precondition for any new talks would be that Pyongyang cease its “provocative ways” and commit to denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.

Victor Cha, a former director of Asian Affairs at the White House National Security Council under the Bush administration, said he expected that re-engagement will take a back seat to the main message of deterrence during the visit to Seoul.

“Right now on this trip the focus is going to be on the deterrence part, that will be the big public message … But privately, the conversations will also deal with getting these talks back on track,” said Cha, who works for the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington.

The visit has symbolic overtones, a show of U.S.-South Korean unity 60 years after the outbreak of the 1950-1953 Korean War. Gates will meet some of the 28,000 U.S. troops stationed in South Korea on Tuesday.

The trip will culminate Wednesday in the first talks between the U.S. and South Korean secretaries of defense and state. U.S. officials say the top-level event, reserved for only the closest U.S. allies, shows how important Obama views relations with South Korea, Asia’s fourth-largest economy.

Clinton also plans discuss the U.S.-South Korea economic relationship, where President Barack Obama has vowed to push through a long-stalled free trade agreement, as well as South Korea’s preparations to hold the a G20 summit this year.

WAR GAMES

U.S. officials say the talks are likely to yield at least one concrete result: the announcement in Seoul of a series of joint U.S.-South Korean military drills over a period of months in both the Yellow Sea and the Sea of Japan.

“These are exercises that enhance our anti-submarine warfare capabilities. They will also, by extension, be a show of force to the North Koreans, and send a message — what we hope to be a very strong message — of deterrence,” said Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell.

China, North Korea’s sole ally, has voiced deep concerns about any U.S.-South Korean drills in the Yellow Sea, which separates China and the Korean peninsula, and urged regional powers to put the Cheonan incident behind them.

U.S. officials, briefing reporters ahead of the trip, dismissed those concerns, saying drills in international waters in the Yellow Sea or elsewhere were “routine.”

“This is about sending a message to (North Korea). It’s not about sending a message to the Chinese. And it should not be interpreted as such,” Morrell said.

John Park, a researcher at the United States Institute of Peace who studies Chinese-North Korean relations, said drills risked aggravating ties between the United States and China.

“As much as the (U.S.-South Korean) announcement will be focused on a sending a message to North Korea, the unintended consequence is that messages are also being sent to China,” Park said.

Beijing broke off military-to-military contacts with the United States this year after the Obama administration notified Congress of a plan to sell Taiwan up to $6.4 billion worth of arms. Underscoring its displeasure, Beijing turned down a proposed fence-mending visit by Gates to China in June.

Park said that inside China, some believe the United States and South Korea are using the Cheonan “as its own pretext to enlarge the scope of the U.S.-South Korean alliance” west toward Chinese coastal waters.

“Their question is: Will the anti-submarine warfare exercises signal an expansion of the coverage area of the U.S.-(South Korea) alliance?”

(Additional reporting by Andrew Quinn; Editing by Stacey Joyce)

Formosa Foundation Kicks Off 8th Annual Ambassador Program

Students Learn the Art of Advocacy at Congressional Boot Camp
WASHINGTON–(Business Wire)–
Twenty-seven students from across the globe who were selected for the highly
competitive Ambassador Program will spend 12 days on Capitol Hill at a
congressional “boot camp” presented by the Los Angeles based Formosa Foundation
to learn the art of public advocacy.

The eighth annual Formosa Foundation Ambassador Program runs from June 14-25.
During the unique two-week program young leaders are drilled how to operate as
an insider, inside the beltway. With more than 50 years combined legislative and
executive experience the Formosa Foundation is exclusively positioned to provide
“hands-on” training on how to be effective in Washington. The Ambassadors
Program combines both advocacy and education and brings supporters of democracy
and human rights into direct contact with experts who know the issues and more
importantly with elected leaders in Congress who create policies that affect
U.S. – Taiwan relations. The Program offers participants an opportunity to
develop the grassroots activism and campaign skills necessary to further
cultivate their leadership potential.

During the first week, Ambassadors meet with U.S. officials, scholars and policy
experts. The speakers include officials from the National Security Council and
the State Department, as well as the Managing Director of the American Institute
in Taiwan, Barbara Schrage, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Randall
Shriver, Congressional Research Service policy analyst Shirley Kan, and
U.S.-Taiwan Business Council President Rupert Hammond Chambers. The participants
will also meet with: Richard Bush, Brookings Institution; Daniel Blumenthal,
American Enterprise Institute; Louisa Greve, the National Endowment for
Democracy; Tamara Luzzatto, Pew Charitable Trusts; Sarah Cook, Freedom House;
Laura Quinn, Catalist; Lane Bailey, Golin Harris; Stephan Yates, DC Asia
Advisors; June Teufel Dryer, University of Miami; and many other notable
scholars and experts. Ambassadors spend their second week meeting with members
of Congress and their staff. Last year, participants held meetings in 175
congressional offices.

Based in Los Angeles, the Formosa Foundation is a nonprofit organization
dedicated to promoting greater understanding of the relationship between Taiwan
and the United States and preserving and enhancing democracy, human rights and
freedom for the people of Taiwan.

PRESS CONFERENCE:

Friday, June 25, 2010. 2:00 PM – 3:00 PM

2325 Rayburn House Office Building

The Formosa Foundation
Terri Giles, 304-741-2632
tgiles@formosafoundation.org

Copyright Business Wire 2010

IAEA report shows Iran’s nuclear defiance says U.S.

(Reuters) – The latest report by the U.N. nuclear watchdog underscores Iran’s refusal to comply with international requirements needed to allow constructive talks on its nuclear program, the White House said on Monday.

World

“This latest IAEA report clearly shows Iran’s continued failure to comply with its international obligations and its sustained lack of cooperation with the IAEA,” White House National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer said.

He was referring to a confidential report obtained by Reuters that said Iran has been preparing extra equipment for enriching uranium to higher levels.

President Barack Obama’s administration is leading a push for new U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran. The West accuses Iran of trying to develop nuclear weapons. Tehran says its purpose is strictly for civilian electricity generation.

Iran first started refining small batches of uranium to 20 percent purity in February, saying it wanted to produce fuel for a medical research reactor. This raised Western suspicion because that takes enrichment closer to the 90 percent purity needed to make atomic weapons.

The International Atomic Energy Agency report said Iran has added a second set of 164 centrifuges — nuclear enrichment machines — to help refine uranium to 20 percent purity.

“Most notably, the report outlines Iran’s continued uranium enrichment at both 3.5 percent and near 20 percent levels, construction of a heavy water research reactor, and refusal to permit the IAEA the access necessary to answer the ongoing questions regarding Qom and long outstanding questions that surround a possible military dimension to its nuclear program,” Hammer said.

“In sum, the IAEA’s latest report underscores that Iran has refused to take any of the steps required of it by the UNSC (U.N. Security Council) or IAEA Board of Governors, which are necessary to enable constructive negotiations on the future of its nuclear program,” he said.

(Reporting by Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Eric Beech)

US: IAEA report shows Iran’s nuclear defiance

May 31 (Reuters) – The latest report by the U.N. nuclear watchdog underscores Iran’s refusal to comply with international requirements needed to allow constructive talks on its nuclear program, the White House said on Monday.

“This latest IAEA report clearly shows Iran’s continued failure to comply with its international obligations and its sustained lack of cooperation with the IAEA,” White House National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer said.

He was referring to a confidential report obtained by Reuters that said Iran has been preparing extra equipment for enriching uranium to higher levels. Such a move could increase tensions with the West over its atomic work. President Barack Obama’s administration is leading a push for new U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran.

(Reporting by Matt Spetalnick, Editing by Sandra Maler)

Any U.S. attempt to kill Awlaki in Yemen unacceptable

(Reuters) – An assassination on Yemeni territory of a radical Muslim cleric wanted dead or alive by U.S. authorities would be unacceptable, the Yemeni prime minister said Sunday.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s National Security Council recently gave the CIA the green light to kill Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S.-Yemeni citizen whom they accuse of having links to al Qaeda and who is believed to be in hiding in southern Yemen.

“We will absolutely not accept that,” Prime Minister Ali Mohammed Megawar told Reuters in an interview.

“We are a sovereign country.”

According to the latest information, Awlaki was still in the southern Yemeni province of Shabwa, Megawar said.

U.S. authorities say Awlaki was added to the CIA’s hit list after he became “operational” in al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which claimed responsibility for a failed plot to blow up a U.S.-bound passenger plane on Christmas Day.

The Nigerian man accused in the attempted bombing met Awlaki while visiting Yemen, and the U.S.-born preacher also had contacts with a U.S. Army psychiatrist who shot dead 13 people at a U.S. Army base in November.

Yemen’s foreign minister said earlier this month that Yemen would not hand Awlaki over to Washington, but instead put him on trial if he is arrested.

After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the United States and Yemen joined forces to fight al Qaeda, and Washington has kept a close eye on the impoverished country, which borders the world’s top oil exporter Saudi Arabia.

Awlaki, whose father is a former minister in Yemen, traveled to the country in 2004, where he taught at a university before he was arrested and imprisoned in 2006 for suspected links to al Qaeda and involvement in attacks.

He was released in December 2007 because he said he had repented, but he was later charged again on similar counts and went into hiding.

Megawar said he disagreed with Yemen being described as a refuge for al Qaeda.

“Yemen is not a safe haven for terrorists. Yemen has al Qaeda, we recognize that … but they are spread out in different areas and are scared as a result of the strict crackdown by the government for all their actions,” he said.

“Yes, al Qaeda is present in Yemen, al Qaeda is a risk in Yemen, but there is exaggeration by the media,” he said.

Last week, a fugitive Saudi Arabian man who was detained for several years at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo until his release in 2006, was named as a senior member of Al Qaeda’s Yemen wing, according to a tape by the group.

Megawar said Othman Ahmed al-Ghamdi’s appointment as a senior operative was another development in the ongoing fight against militants in Yemen but added, “We have nothing to do with who comes and goes.”

(Editing by Myra MacDonald)

INTERVIEW-Any US attempt to kill Awlaki in Yemen unacceptable

* Yemen will not accept U.S. killing of Awlaki on territory

* Yemen “not a safe haven” for al Qaeda, threat exaggerated

By Raissa Kasolowsky

SANAA, May 30 (Reuters) – An assassination on Yemeni territory of a radical Muslim cleric wanted dead or alive by U.S. authorities would be unacceptable, the Yemeni prime minister said on Sunday.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s National Security Council recently gave the CIA the green light to kill Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S.-Yemeni citizen whom they accuse of having links to al Qaeda and who is believed to be in hiding in southern Yemen.

“We will absolutely not accept that,” Prime Minister Ali Mohammed Megawar told Reuters in an interview.

“We are a sovereign country.”

According to the latest information, Awlaki was still in the southern Yemeni province of Shabwa, Megawar said.

U.S. authorities say Awlaki was added to the CIA’s hit list after he became “operational” in al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which claimed responsibility for a failed plot to blow up a U.S.-bound passenger plane on Christmas Day.

The Nigerian man accused in the attempted bombing met Awlaki while visiting Yemen, and the U.S.-born preacher also had contacts with a U.S. Army psychiatrist who shot dead 13 people at a U.S. Army base in November.

Yemen’s foreign minister said earlier this month that Yemen would not hand Awlaki over to Washington, but instead put him on trial if he is arrested.

After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the United States and Yemen joined forces to fight al Qaeda, and Washington has kept a close eye on the impoverished country, which borders the world’s top oil exporter Saudi Arabia.

Awlaki, whose father is a former minister in Yemen, travelled to the country in 2004, where he taught at a university before he was arrested and imprisoned in 2006 for suspected links to al Qaeda and involvement in attacks.

He was released in December 2007 because he said he had repented, but he was later charged again on similar counts and went into hiding.

Megawar said he disagreed with Yemen being described as a refuge for al Qaeda.

“Yemen is not a safe haven for terrorists. Yemen has al Qaeda, we recognise that … but they are spread out in different areas and are scared as a result of the strict crackdown by the government for all their actions”, he said.

“Yes, al Qaeda is present in Yemen, al Qaeda is a risk in Yemen, but there is exaggeration by the media,” he said.

Last week, a fugitive Saudi Arabian man who was detained for several years at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo until his release in 2006, was named as a senior member of Al Qaeda’s Yemen wing, according to a tape by the group. [ID:nLDE64R043]

Megawar said Othman Ahmed al-Ghamdi’s appointment as a senior operative was another development in the ongoing fight against militants in Yemen but added, “We have nothing to do with who comes and goes.” (Editing by Myra MacDonald)

TIMELINE – Obstacle course for U.S.-China ties in 2010

Senior Chinese and U.S. officials gathered in the Chinese capital on Monday for their second Strategic and Economic Dialogue to discuss the direction of ties between the two global powers.

Both sides want to ease tensions after a bumpy start to the year. Here is a timeline of major dates in relations this year:

Jan. 12 – Google threatens to pull out of China over censorship and hacking attacks from within the country.

Jan. 21 – U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivers speech calling for Internet freedoms, names China as a country that has stepped up censorship of the web.

Jan. 29 – Obama administration notifies U.S. Congress of proposed arms sales to Taiwan worth $6.4 billion. China condemns the sales to the island, which it considers its territory, and threatens sanctions on companies involved.

Feb. 17 – U.S. aircraft carrier USS Nimitz visits Hong Hong, the self-administered territory under Chinese rule, despite a Chinese pledge to curtail military exchanges with the United States after its announced arms sales to Taiwan.

Feb. 18 – Obama meets exiled Tibetan Buddhist leader the Dalai Lama at the White House. China reviles the Dalai Lama as a separatist for advocating self-rule for his homeland and condemns the meeting.

March 2-4 – U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg and Jeffrey Bader, Senior Director for the U.S. National Security Council for Asian Affairs, visit Beijing for talks, seeking to ease tensions.

March 15 – One hundred and thirty members of U.S. Congress issue a letter demanding more pressure on China to let its yuan currency appreciate. The next day, a bipartisan bill on the issue goes before the Senate.

March 22 – Google shuts its China-based search service Google.cn and begins redirecting mainland Web searchers to a portal in Hong Kong. China criticises Google but does not entirely shut off the Hong Kong site.

March 31 – China agrees to serious negotiations with Washington and other Western powers about proposed new U.N. Security Council-backed sanctions on Iran after months of stressing its reluctance to back sanctions. China has the power to veto any Security Council resolution.

April 1 – China says Hu will attend a summit on nuclear security in Washington, adding to signs that tensions between the two nations are ebbing.

April 3 – U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner says he is delaying an April 15 report on whether China manipulates its currency but vows to press for a more flexible Chinese currency exchange rate policy.

April 8 – Geithner briefly visits Beijing, holding talks with Chinese Vice Premier Wang Qishan.

April 12-13 – Obama hosts a multi-nation nuclear security summit in Washington that is attended by Chinese President Hu Jintao.

April 15 – Hu attends “BRIC” summit in Brazil, bringing together the leaders of Brazil, Russia, India and China for their second such meeting.

May 3-7 – North Korean leader Kim Jong-il visits China, his country’s main backer.

May 13-14 – The United States and China resume a formal bilateral dialogue on human rights after a two-year hiatus.

May 16-26 – U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke leads trade mission to Hong Kong, China and Indonesia, promoting deals with American companies in clean energy.

May 18 – China joins the four other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, including the U.S., in backing a draft Security Council resolution proposing expanded sanctions against Iran over its disputed nuclear activities.

May 20 – South Korea says it has found North Korea was responsible for torpedoing its warship, the Cheonan, on March 26, killing 46 sailors. The United States condemns the North over the sinking. Beijing does not openly criticise its neighbour.

May 23 – South Korea says it will taking the bombing case to the U.N. Security Council.

May 24-25 – Senior officials from the United States and China meet in Beijing for Strategic and Economic Dialogue, an annual meeting to discuss broad economic, foreign policy and security concerns. The U.S. side to be led by Clinton and Geithner.

June 26-27 – Meeting of G20 leaders of major rich and developing economies scheduled in Toronto, Canada, giving Hu and Obama an opportunity to meet.

Later in the year — The two countries are preparing for their Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade, a regular meeting that focuses on economic ties. Last year’s was held in late October in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou.

Nov. 2 – Mid-term elections for U.S. Congress. With economic concerns uppermost in many voters’ minds, trade and currency tensions with China may become a electoral factor.

Nov. 11-12 – South Korea to host second summit for the year of the G20 group of major rich and developing economies, where Hu and Obama will have a further chance to meet.

Nov. 13-14 – Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, to be held in Yokohama, Japan, presents another opportunity for the two leaders to meet.

November-December – When Obama visited China in November 2009, Hu accepted his invitation to visit the United States in 2010. This would be a state visit separate from his attendance at the nuclear summit. No date has been set for the trip, but a time late in the year appears most likely.

(Reporting by Chris Buckley in Beijing; Jim Wolf, Doug Palmer and Paul Eckert in Washington; Ralph Jennings in Taipei; Editing by Nick Macfie)

South Korea vows caution over ship, North sees war

South Korea said after a rare emergency security meeting on Friday it would respond prudently to the sinking of one of its naval ships by the North, but Pyongyang warned the peninsula was being driven to war.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Washington strongly condemned North Korea’s action and called for an international response.

The South announced on Thursday that it had overwhelming evidence a North Korean submarine had entered its waters in March and attacked the Cheonan corvette, killing 46 sailors in what President Lee Myung-bak called a “military provocation”.

North Korea denied the accusation and said it was ready to tear up all agreements with the South, with whom it remains technically at war under a truce that ended fighting in the 1950-53 Korean War.

“It was a military provocation and violation of the U.N. Charter and the truce agreement,” Lee, whose 2-½ years in office have seen relations with the North turn increasingly frosty, said in a statement.

“Since this case is very serious and has a grave importance, we cannot afford to have a slightest mistake and will be very prudent in all response measures we take,” his office quoted him as telling a rare emergency National Security Council meeting.

Lee is expected to announce his response early next week.

Clinton, speaking on Friday in Tokyo, said there must be a clear message to North Korea that provocative actions have consequences.

“We cannot allow this attack on South Korea to go unanswered by the international community,” Clinton said after talks with Japanese Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada.

“So, we will determine our best options and send a clear, unmistakable message to North Korea regarding the international community’s and most particularly, its neighbours’ concerns about its behaviour.”

South Korean Defence Minister Kim Tae-young said Seoul would work with the international community to come up with non-military sanctions against the reclusive state.

In the past, both sides had put a limit on their hostility.

“North Korea has surpassed these limits. For those acts, the government will definitely make sure North Korea pays,” Kim said.

Yonhap news agency reported South Korea and the United States were considering raising the alert status on North Korea as tensions build.

“PHASE OF WAR”

North Korea was typically defiant.

“From this time on, we will regard the situation as a phase of war and will be responding resolutely to all problems in North-South relations,” the North’s Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Fatherland said in a statement.

“If the South puppet group comes out with ‘response’ and ‘retaliation’, we will respond strongly with ruthless punishment including the total shutdown of North-South ties, abrogation of the North-South agreement on non-aggression and abolition of all North-South cooperation projects.”

Seoul has repeatedly said it would not strike back at the North, aware that would frighten away investors already jittery about the escalating tension on the divided peninsula.

Apart from international sanctions, there is little else it can do. Economic relations have come to a near standstill since Lee became president, apart from a joint factory park just inside impoverished North Korea which now has to rely almost entirely on China, its only major ally.

Yonhap News reported citing government sources Seoul may shut down sea routes that allow North Korean vessels sail through South Korean waters near its southern end and save costs.

North Korea has frequently threatened to attack Seoul but most analysts say that, in the face of a much better equipped South Korean army backed by some 28,000 U.S. troops on the peninsula, any major confrontation would be suicidal for the Pyongyang leadership.

Some analysts still warned the more the North’s now frail leader Kim Jong-il is pushed into a corner, the greater the risk of clashes. Kim is also trying to secure the succession for one of his sons.

China has so far maintained its support of the North and said it would make its own assessment of the investigation into the sinking of the Cheonan.

North Korea said it would send its own investigators to the South to look into the incident. But Yonhap news agency quoted a South Korean defence ministry source as saying it had no intention of allowing such a delegation.

(Additional reporting by Jonathan Thatcher in SEOUL; Arshad Mohammed and Isabel Reynolds in TOKYO; Editing by Jeremy Laurence)

North Korea warns of all-out war, even as China urges calm

Beijing/Washington, May 21 (ANI): North Korea has warned South Korea that it will not hesitate to launch an “all out war” if the latter decides to take “firm” measures” against it.

Pyongyang’s aggressive broadside has prompted China to intervene and call for calm, the China Daily reports.

The broadside follows Seoul’s accusation that North Korea blew up and sank naval ship, “Cheonan” on March 26 this year.

Pyongyang has denied involvement and called the investigation results a fabrication.

“Our army and people will promptly react to any ”punishment” and ”retaliation” and to any ”sanctions” infringing upon our state interests with various forms of tough measures including an all-out war,” the DPRK”s official news agency KCNA quoted the National Defense Commission as saying in a statement.

South Korean President Lee Myung-bak has held an emergency meeting of his National Security Council today, but made it clear that his government has no plans for a retaliatory strike as of now.

Chinese Vice-Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai called the sinking “unfortunate” but refused to comment further. He reiterated China”s long-standing view on the need to maintain peace on the Korean Peninsula.

“The parties involved should stay calm and exercise restraint … to avoid escalation of the situation,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu told a separate briefing later on Thursday. (ANI)

Obama sending top security aides to Pak to push harder against terrorists on its soil

Washington, May 18 (ANI): President Barack Obama is likely to send two of his senior most national security aides to Pakistan this week to pressurise the Yousuf Raza Gilani government to investigate the botched Times Square bombing plot and more importantly prevent any such similar terror schemes against the US.

According to sources in the Obama Administration, Central Investigation Agency (CIA) director Leon Panetta and National Security Advisor General James Jones are likely to arrive in Islamabad on Tuesday (today, May 18).

This would be first such visit of top US officials to Pakistan since the bungled terror plot.

The top level American officials would prod Pakistan to take tougher steps against the Taliban and other insurgent groups, and would convey the risks regarding Pakistan’s relationship with the US if a deadly terrorist attack originated in that country, The New York Times reported.

“In light of the failed Times Square terrorist attack and other terrorist attacks that trace to the border region, we believe that it is time to redouble our efforts with our allies in Pakistan to close this safe haven and create an environment where we and the Pakistani people can lead safe and productive lives,” National Security Council spokesman Michael Hammer said.

One of the prime concerns for the US officials, which is likely to be discussed at length during their Islamabad visit, is the growing interconnection between Islamic extremist groups flourishing in Pakistan’s volatile tribal regions.

Soon after the May 1 failed bombing plot, Pakistani authorities detained a man named Muhammed Rehan from a mosque in Karachi, which is known for its links with the banned terror group Jaish-e-Muhammed (JeM).

“Shahzad was able to connect with people (Rehan) in Pakistan who travelled with him to North Waziristan and back. How he did that without the Pakistani intelligence service knowing about it is a worry,” the newspaper quoted another American official privy to the probe, as saying. (ANI)

Times Square case: If Pak Taliban is involved,it could be a game changing development

Washington, May 7 (ANI): The foiled Times Square bombing plot may represent a turning point for the US as it confronts the threat posed by the Pakistan Taliban, a terrorist group that up until now seemed only distant.

According to the Christian Science Monitor (CSM), there is now a real concern in Washington that bomb suspect Faisal Shahzad received training from the Pakistan Taliban.

If proved, this would be “a game-changing development,” claimed Juan Zarate, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank in Washington.

CSM quoted Zarate as saying further that, “You would now have a new, potential global actor coming out of western Pakistan to complement what Al Qaeda has been doing for 15 years.”

Zarate, a former top official at the National Security Council, wonders why, if the Pakistan Taliban is in fact training individuals like Shahzad, the bombing wasn’t successful.

“I still think it’s odd that he wasn’t well trained by a group that is very good at blowing things up and killing people. The level of direction is still in question here,” Zarate said.

The would-be attack could be seen as strategically inept on the part of the Pakistan Taliban, otherwise known as Tehrik-i-Taliban, because if anything it could galvanize American opinion against militant groups.

But according to James Carafano, a senior analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a think tank in Washington, that is a short sighted reading.

He said to the Taliban, even the failed attack is a tactical success because it prompted a large reaction in the American media and by the government. (ANI)

International legal experts question legality of US drone strikes

Washington, Apr.7 (ANI): While the Obama Administration is trying to defend the drone strikes on ungoverned tribal regions along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, legal scholars have questioned the legality of the Central Investigation Agency (CIA) operated missile hits.

Legal experts and the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur for Extra-judicial Executions have raised questions over the continuous US drone attacks in tribal areas bordering Afghanistan in Pakistan, in which over 400 to 500 suspected extremists have been killed since January 2009

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) quoted Professor Mary Ellen O’Connell of the University of Notre Dame law school describing the missile attacks as “unlawful killings” that violated international law.

Days ago, US State Department’s legal advisor, Harold Koh, had underlined that the White House, under the international law, has the authority to carry out such missile attacks.

“In this ongoing armed conflict, the US has the authority under international law, and the responsibility to its citizens, to use force, including lethal force, to defend itself, including by targeting persons such as high-level al Qaeda leaders who are planning attacks,” Koh had told international law scholars late last month.

However, legal experts said Koh’s statement didn’t answer several important questions.

“A number of controversial questions were left unanswered by Koh’s speech,” the newspaper quoted Jonathan Manes, a lawyer on the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Security Project, as saying.

“The speech did not say where the government draws the line between legitimate targets, combatants and those taking part in hospitalities, and civilians, who cannot be targeted. The speech also did not set out any rules on where drones strikes can be used to target and kill individuals,” Manes said.

A former National Security Council official in the Bush and Obama administrations, Brett McGurk, who is currently at the Council on Foreign Relations, said that Koh sidestepped some of the “thorniest issues” surrounding targeted killings.

McGurk categorically questioned the implications of civilian agencies like the CIA’s involvement in the drone strikes.

“As a civilian agency and a non-combatant under International Humanitarian Law, the CIA is not governed by the same laws of war that cover US military personnel,” the newspaper said. (ANI)

China denies hacking Indian Defence Ministry computers

New Delhi, Apr 7 (ANI): China has denied that Chengdu-based hackers stole information from the Indian Defence Ministry.

A group of researchers at the Munk Centre for International Studies at the University of Toronto claimed that a cyber-espionage group based in southwest China stole documents from the Indian Defence Ministry and emails from the Dalai Lama’s office.

The hackers allegedly stole classified reports about security in several Indian states, and about several Indian missile systems.

“China firmly opposes any kind of cyber crime, including cyber attacks. The cyber attack is an international issue requiring the cooperation and joint efforts of the international community,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Jiang Yu told reporters.I don’t know what evidence these people have, or what their motives are,” the China Daily quoted Jiang said, as referring to the researchers.

The spokesperson added that China could investigate if these allegations were provided with evidence.

“Our policy is very clear. We resolutely oppose all Internet crime, including hacking,” she said.

The “cyberspies” used popular online services, including Twitter, Google groups and Yahoo mail, to access infected computers, ultimately directing them to communicate with command and control servers in China, said the report released by the Munk Centre, entitled Shadows in the Cloud.

Stolen documents recovered by the researchers contained sensitive information taken from India’s National Security Council Secretariat, the group of researchers said.

“We have heard about the hacking report and the concerned department is looking into the case,” said Sitanshu Kar, Indian Defence Ministry’s spokesman. (ANI)

Tsunami alert lifted in Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur, Apr 7 (ANI): The Malaysian Meteorological Department has lifted the tsunami alert it issued for the coastal areas of Perlis, Penang and Kedah following the 7.5 magnitude earthquake in North Sumatra.

In a statement released on Wednesday morning, it said that it lifted the alert because only a small tsunami had occurred in Sumatra following the quake.

The earthquake had hit North Sumatera, 448km southwest of Pangkor Island Wednesday morning. Tremors were felt in the west coast of Peninsula Malaysia.

The department had earlier warned people to keep away from the beach, The Star reports.

In George Town, state Meteorological Department director Loh Eng Kee said the tsunami alert was called off at 8.20 am (local time) as Sumatra had only experienced a small tsunami.

“A tsunami alert was issued in Penang, Perlis and Kedah at 6.45am following a 7.5 magnitude earthquake off the sea of northern Sumatra.

“The National Security Council, police, the Chief Minister’s Office and the State Secretariat were informed of the situation.

“After monitoring sea conditions, our headquarters in Petaling Jaya issued a cancellation of the alert after only a small tsunami touched the coast of Sumatra,” Loh said.

Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, who was briefed on the tsunami alert at the department in Bayan Lepas, said the relevant departments responded swiftly to the alert.We are thankful that there was no tsunami,” he said.

Tremors due to the earthquake shook high-rise buildings on Penang island including those on Macallum Street, Rifle Range and Sungai Ara causing fear among residents.

The Indonesia Meteorology and Geophysics Agency also issued a tsunami warning following the quake, but lifted it two hours later. (ANI)

TIMELINE – The obstacle course for U.S.-China ties in 2010

Thu, Apr 1 02:12 PM

REUTERS – China said on Thursday that its President Hu Jintao will go to a nuclear security summit in Washington on April 12-13, ending uncertainty about his attendance after a bout of tensions between the two powers.

Both governments are seeking to cool those tensions. Here is a timeline of significant dates in relations this year:

Jan. 12 – Google threatens to pull out of China over censorship and hacking attacks from within the country.

Jan. 21 – U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivers speech calling for Internet freedoms, names China as a country that has stepped up censorship of the web.

Jan. 29 – Obama administration notifies U.S. Congress of proposed arms sales to Taiwan worth $6.4 billion. China condemns the sales to the island, which it considers its territory, and threatens sanctions on companies involved.

Feb. 17 – U.S. aircraft carrier USS Nimitz visits Hong Hong, the self-administered territory under Chinese rule, despite a Chinese pledge to curtail military exchanges with the United States after its announced arms sales to Taiwan.

Feb. 18 – President Obama meets exiled Tibetan Buddhist leader, the Dalai Lama, at the White House. China reviles the Dalai Lama as a “separatist” for advocating self-rule for his homeland and condemns the meeting.

March 2-4 – U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg and Jeffrey Bader, Senior Director for the U.S. National Security Council for Asian Affairs, visit Beijing for talks, seeking to overcome tensions.

March 15 – One hundred and thirty members of U.S. Congress issue a letter demanding more pressure on China to let its yuan currency appreciate. The next day, a bipartisan bill on the issue goes before the Senate.

March 22 – Google shuts its China-based search service Google.cn and begins redirecting mainland Web searchers to a portal in Hong Kong, shifting responsibility for censoring Google for Chinese users from the company to the Chinese government. China criticises Google but does not entirely shut off the Hong Kong site.

March 30 – President Obama says he hopes the United Nations Security Council will approve new sanctions against Iran over its nuclear activities within weeks. China has stressed its reluctance to approve such sanctions. It has the power to veto any Security Council resolution.

April 12-13 – President Obama hosts a multi-nation nuclear security summit in Washington D.C. Chinese President Hu Jintao will attend, opening an opportunity for a bilateral meeting between the two leaders.

April 15 – U.S. Treasury due to release latest six-monthly report on whether China and other countries are manipulating their currencies for trade advantage. In the past, release of the report has been sometimes postponed.

April 15-16 – Chinese President Hu due to attend “BRIC” summit in Brazil, bringing together the leaders of Brazil, Russia, India and China for their second such meeting.

May 15-25 – U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke leads trade mission to Hong Kong, China and Indonesia, promoting deals with American companies in clean energy.

Late-May – Senior officials from the United States and China due to meet in Beijing for Strategic and Economic Dialogue, an annual meeting to discuss broad economic, foreign policy and security concerns. The U.S. side is likely to be led by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

June 26-27 – Meeting of G20 leaders of major rich and developing economies scheduled in Toronto, Canada, giving Presidents Hu and Obama an opportunity to meet.

Later in the year – The two countries are preparing for their Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade, a regular meeting that focuses on economic ties. Last year’s was held in late October in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou.

Nov. 2 – Mid-term elections for U.S. Congress. With economic concerns uppermost in many voters’ minds, trade and currency tensions with China may become a electoral issue.

Nov. 13-14 – Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, to be held in Yokohama, Japan, presents another opportunity for the two leaders to meet.

November – South Korea scheduled to host second summit for the year of the G20 group of major rich and developing economies, where Hu and Obama will have a further chance to meet. The summit is likely to take place immediately before or after the APEC summit.

November-December – When President Obama visited China in November 2009, Chinese President Hu accepted his invitation to visit the United States in 2010. This would be a state visit separate from his attendance at the nuclear summit. No date has been set for the trip. One possibility is June, when Hu attends the G20 summit in Canada, but a date after the U.S. mid-term elections appears more likely.

Timeline: The obstacle course for U.S.-China ties in 2010

(Reuters) – China said on Thursday that its President Hu Jintao will go to a nuclear security summit in Washington on April 12-13, ending uncertainty about his attendance after a bout of tensions between the two powers.

World | China

Both governments are seeking to cool those tensions. Here is a timeline of significant dates in relations this year:

January 12 – Google threatens to pull out of China over censorship and hacking attacks from within the country.

January 21 – U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivers speech calling for Internet freedoms, names China as a country that has stepped up censorship of the web.

January 29 – Obama administration notifies U.S. Congress of proposed arms sales to Taiwan worth $6.4 billion. China condemns the sales to the island, which it considers its territory, and threatens sanctions on companies involved.

February 17 – U.S. aircraft carrier USS Nimitz visits Hong Hong, the self-administered territory under Chinese rule, despite a Chinese pledge to curtail military exchanges with the United States after its announced arms sales to Taiwan.

February 18 – President Obama meets exiled Tibetan Buddhist leader, the Dalai Lama, at the White House. China reviles the Dalai Lama as a “separatist” for advocating self-rule for his homeland and condemns the meeting.

March 2-4 – U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg and Jeffrey Bader, Senior Director for the U.S. National Security Council for Asian Affairs, visit Beijing for talks, seeking to overcome tensions.

March 15 – One hundred and thirty members of U.S. Congress issue a letter demanding more pressure on China to let its yuan currency appreciate. The next day, a bipartisan bill on the issue goes before the Senate.

March 22 – Google shuts its China-based search service Google.cn and begins redirecting mainland Web searchers to a portal in Hong Kong, shifting responsibility for censoring Google for Chinese users from the company to the Chinese government. China criticizes Google but does not entirely shut off the Hong Kong site.

March 31 – China agrees to serious negotiations with Washington and other Western powers about proposed new United Nations Security Council-backed sanctions on Iran, after months of stressing its reluctance to back sanctions. China has the power to veto any Security Council resolution.

April 12-13 – President Obama hosts a multi-nation nuclear security summit in Washington D.C. Chinese President Hu Jintao will attend, opening an opportunity for a bilateral meeting between the two leaders.

April 15 – U.S. Treasury due to release latest six-monthly report on whether China and other countries are manipulating their currencies for trade advantage. In the past, release of the report has been sometimes postponed.

April 15-16 – Chinese President Hu due to attend “BRIC” summit in Brazil, bringing together the leaders of Brazil, Russia, India and China for their second such meeting.

May 15-25 – U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke leads trade mission to Hong Kong, China and Indonesia, promoting deals with American companies in clean energy.

Late-May – Senior officials from the United States and China due to meet in Beijing for Strategic and Economic Dialogue, an annual meeting to discuss broad economic, foreign policy and security concerns. The U.S. side is likely to be led by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

June 26-27 – Meeting of G20 leaders of major rich and developing economies scheduled in Toronto, Canada, giving Presidents Hu and Obama an opportunity to meet.

Later in the year – The two countries are preparing for their Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade, a regular meeting that focuses on economic ties. Last year’s was held in late October in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou.

November 2 – Mid-term elections for U.S. Congress. With economic concerns uppermost in many voters’ minds, trade and currency tensions with China may become a electoral issue.

November 13-14 – Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, to be held in Yokohama, Japan, presents another opportunity for the two leaders to meet.

November – South Korea scheduled to host second summit for the year of the G20 group of major rich and developing economies, where Hu and Obama will have a further chance to meet. The summit is likely to take place immediately before or after the APEC summit.

November-December – When President Obama visited China in November 2009, Chinese President Hu accepted his invitation to visit the United States in 2010. This would be a state visit separate from his attendance at the nuclear summit. No date has been set for the trip. One possibility is June, when Hu attends the G20 summit in Canada, but a date after the U.S. mid-term elections appears more likely.

(Reporting by Chris Buckley in Beijing; Jim Wolf, Doug Palmer and Paul Eckert in Washington; Ralph Jennings in Taipei)

Pakistan hands over 56-page wish list to US before strategic dialogue

Washington, Mar.24 (ANI): Unmanned Predator drones, helicopter gunships, more financial aid, a civil nuclear accord, and a direct role of the White House in reviving the stalled Indo-Pak composite dialogue are some of the ‘marked’ requirements in the 56-page wish list that Pakistan has handed over to the United States just ahead of the strategic dialogue.

The document also requests for greater cooperation between Pakistani spy agency (the ISI) and US intelligence outfits.

Islamabad also wants a role in any future talks between the West backed Afghanistan and the Taliban.

According to a Pakistani official, who refused to be named, Islamabad’s fears of being outflanked by New Delhi, which has forged close ties with Kabul, are reflected in the document’s ‘indirect’ language about regional security issues.

The wish list also raises concerns about India’s effort to modernise its military, in part through buying US equipment and weapons, The Nation reports.

When asked about the details of the wish list, the Pakistan military’s spokesperson, Major General Athar Abbas confirmed its presence but refused to divulge any detail regarding it.

Commenting on the reports, spokesman for the National Security Council, Michael Hammer said the White House is looking forward to Wednesday’s (March 24) dialogue but denied to comment on Pakistan’s specific proposals, which were made during a series of meetings between Pakistani and US officials in the recent past.

“During the course of those discussions, a considerable number of ideas, initiatives, and opportunities have been brought up by both sides,” Hammer said, adding: “We are not prepared to comment on any one set of ideas other than to say that we are encouraged by an open and robust dialogue.”

Meanwhile, the Pentagon has played down the chance of any big announcement of fresh aid at the end of the talks, saying the dialogue would focus on strengthening long-term bilateral ties.

“I would not look to this, at the end of it, for there to be some great announcement about any hard items that are being produced as a result of the conversations,” Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters.

“This is a dialogue designed to produce a better long-term strategic relationship … this is not simply about asking and receiving items,” Morrell added. (ANI)

Obama confirms 24-hour flying visit

The White House says US President Barack Obama is pushing ahead with his trip to Asia and Australia because the area is fundamental to America’s economic and security interests.

The trip will be shorter than first planned, with the president spending little more than 24 hours in Australia, and only visiting Canberra.

The White House has revealed the details and expectations for the visit, suggesting climate change, trade and terrorism will all be on the agenda.

Some were wondering if this trip would go ahead at all, after being delayed and condensed so the president could try to win support for his domestic health reforms.

But the White House says the president considers it critical that he builds on the partnerships in the Asia-Pacific region, suggesting it is an area that has been neglected.

In a phone briefing for reporters, National Security Council chief of staff Denis McDonough described Australia and Indonesia as essential partners.

“The Asia-Pacific region is fundamental to the economic and security interests of the United States in the 21st century,” he said.

“And in order to effectively advance those interests, we need to deepen and broaden our engagement in our leadership in the region, which is why we have taken a more aggressive role in engaging groups like APEC and ASEAN.”

The National Security Council’s director for Asian affairs, Jeff Bader, says China is bound to be discussed because the US and Australia share similar perceptions, describing Prime Minister Kevin Rudd as being deeply knowledgeable on the subject.

“We both see China’s emergence as a major economy, a driving economy in the world, as offering great potential to both our countries,” he said.

“Potentials for growth, potential for prosperity of our citizens, who are also looking to reshape the international regulatory system through the G20 in a way that ensures that new actors, such as China, are acting consistent with international norms.”

Mr Bader says visiting Australia will deepen the partnership on environmental and economic issues and that clean energy and trade will be key areas of discussion.

“Australia’s got great beef but we want to make sure that there are not obstacles to the import of US beef,” he said.

“But also the aviation sector is one where the US has found good customers is Australia in the past.”

Before Mr Obama arrives in Australia though, for what will be a brisk visit, he is spending time in Indonesia, home to the world’s largest Muslim population.

It will be the first visit to a Muslim country since he delivered a key address in Cairo in June 2009 and the White House has suggested the president’s return to his childhood home of Indonesia could be another opportunity to bridge the divisions with the Muslim world.

Mexico gunmen kill American consulate staff

(Reuters) – Gunmen in the drug war-plagued Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez killed two Americans and a Mexican linked to the local U.S. consulate and President Barack Obama expressed outrage at the attack.

World | Barack Obama | Mexico

An American woman working at the consulate in Ciudad Juarez, just over the border from El Paso, Texas, and her U.S. husband were shot dead by suspected drug gang hitmen in broad daylight on Saturday as they left a consulate social event, U.S. and Mexican officials told Reuters.

A Mexican man married to another consulate employee was killed around the same time in another part of the city after he and his wife left the same event, a U.S. official said.

The official, who asked not to be identified, said it was not clear if the victims had been specifically targeted, and the motive for the attacks was unknown.

Bloodshed has exploded in recent months in Ciudad Juarez as the head of the Juarez cartel, Vicente Carrillo Fuentes, fights off a bloody offensive by Mexico’s No. 1 fugitive drug lord, Joaquin “Shorty” Guzman, at the worst hotspot of Mexico’s three-year-old drug war.

“The president is deeply saddened and outraged by the news,” said White House National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer. He said Obama “shares in the outrage of the Mexican people at the murders of thousands in Ciudad Juarez and elsewhere in Mexico.”

The State Department updated its warning on travel to Mexico to say it had authorized the departure of dependents of U.S. government personnel from consulates in Ciudad Juarez and five other northern border cities.

“The safety and security of our personnel and their families in Mexico and at posts around the world is always our highest priority,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in statement. “These appalling assaults on members of our own State Department family are, sadly, part of a growing tragedy besetting many communities in Mexico.”

Nearly 19,000 people have been killed since President Felipe Calderon came to power in Mexico in late 2006 and launched a military assault on the country’s powerful drug cartels, sparking a surge in violence that has alarmed Washington, foreign investors and tourists.

Most victims are rival traffickers and police, and to a lesser extent soldiers, local officials and bystanders. It is rare for drug gang hitmen to target foreigners.

Saturday’s murders may be have been carried out by gangs related to the Juarez cartel, which has controlled cocaine trafficking in the region, the Chihuahua state government said in a statement.

“The Mexican authorities are determined to clarify what happened and bring those responsible to justice,” the Mexican Foreign Ministry said of the killings.

CHILDREN SURVIVE SHOOTING

The attack on the U.S. couple began with a car chase and ended in front of the main border crossing into El Paso, an area heavily patrolled by soldiers, local newspaper El Diario reported. The couple’s baby girl survived the attack.

The Mexican spouse was murdered in an upscale neighborhood of the city when gunmen boxed in his car with other vehicles and shot him, according to a local newspaper photographer who soon arrived at the scene.

The dead man’s wife, who was following in a second car, was unhurt, but their two children were wounded.

Calderon was already scheduled to visit Ciudad Juarez on Tuesday, his third trip there in a month, as he scrambles to find a way to deal with a surge in killings that 8,000 troops and federal police on the ground have failed to curb.

The drug war has killed more than 4,600 people in the manufacturing city in two years, and constant scenes of bullet-ridden vehicles and bodies lying in pools of blood have prompted many middle-class residents to flee.

Across Mexico, drug violence is at its worst level ever, and many U.S. students have heeded warnings not to cross the border this year for their annual “spring break” vacation.

A burst of drug gang clashes killed at least 27 people, including four who were beheaded, this weekend around the Pacific resort of Acapulco.

At least 13 were killed on Saturday and at least 14 on Sunday, police said. They included nine men killed in a shootout and a young woman shot as she drove by in a taxi.

Obama voiced his support for Calderon’s drug war during a visit to Mexico last year, but the rising violence along the border with Mexico has become a big concern for Washington.

(Additional reporting by Caren Bohan; writing by Noel Randewich; editing by Catherine Bremer and Chris Wilson)

A week on, Maliki pulls ahead in Iraq race

(Reuters) – Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki pulled ahead on Sunday in early results of an election Iraqis hoped would end years of sectarian strife, but a divided vote suggested long and fraught talks to form a government are ahead.

World

Early results showed Maliki’s State of Law bloc ahead in seven of 18 provinces, with the Iraqiya list headed by former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi in second place, leading in five.

The Iraqi National Alliance (INA), Maliki’s main competitor among Iraq’s Shi’ite majority, trailed close behind, the last of three blocs leading a divided vote that reflects a nation fragmented by decades of sectarian and ethnic conflict.

The outcome of Iraq’s first parliamentary poll since 2005 will shape its future as nascent stability is tested by the coming U.S. troop withdrawal and political struggles undermining Iraq’s efforts to re-establish itself on the world stage.

Maliki, who many Iraqis credit for improving security, won almost twice as many votes as the INA in southern Basra, ground zero for a wave of new investment into Iraq’s rich oil sector.

Allawi’s Iraqiya, a secularist, cross-sectarian list, was a distance third in Basra, but initial results showed him sweeping western Anbar, a stronghold for minority Sunnis whose long political dominance ended with Saddam Hussein’s ouster in 2003.

Allawi, a secular Shi’ite, also galvanized support among Sunni Arab voters in northern Nineveh, still gripped by a tenacious Sunni Islamist insurgency.

The early results represent more than 3 million votes of about 12 million cast. Final results are not expected for weeks.

Anxious politicians have criticized Iraq’s Independent High Electoral Commission (IHEC) for delaying results for days, heightening tension and drawing attention to charges of fraud.

Maliki, in an address to the National Security Council on national television, acknowledged that the March 7 vote had some problems but said that no election had “zero violations.”

“There was manipulation,” he said. “But it does not change the results.”

Allawi’s Iraqiya list has put forward a long list of complaints about fraud, including ballots found in the garbage and more than 200,000 soldiers who were unable to vote because their names did not appear on official rosters.

IHEC officials say almost 2,000 complaints were logged, far less than in provincial elections last year. The United Nations, which has been coaching IHEC before and after the vote, has downplayed the complaints.

HARD-BOILED POLITICS

Even before a complete national picture emerges, political maneuvering has already kicked into high gear. While Maliki may have fared well, no bloc is expected to win an outright majority and Maliki would likely be forced to ally with other groups.

Both Allawi and the INA have held meetings with minority Kurds, who may prove kingmakers of the day, and Arab politicians are reaching across party lines to explore possible alliances.

While it is too early to say who the ruling coalition may include, a strong showing for Maliki could weaken demands from resentful rivals that he be barred from a second term.

Abdul Hadi al-Hasani, a senior State of Law politician, said State of Law was considering alliance with Kurds and with the INA. Neither had it ruled out allying with Allawi, he said.

Allawi has been a fierce critic of Maliki, especially when the prime minister supported a ban of hundreds of candidates suspected of ties to Saddam’s Baath party, including a senior Sunni candidate on Allawi’s list.

Even such animosity may not be an obstacle to alliance in the hard-boiled politics that has characterized post-2003 Iraq.

Yahya al-Kubaisy, a researcher at the Iraq Institute for Strategic Studies, warned that a government excluding Iraqiya risked further alienating Sunnis. “If this happens we must expect a return of violence to Iraq,” he said.

A list including two powerful Kurdish parties, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani’s Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) and Kurdish President Masoud Barzani’s Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), are sure to try to extract concessions on the disputed oil city of Kirkuk, which they claim as their own.

The parties dominated Kurdish provinces, but they faced an unprecedented challenge from the reform-minded Goran group.

Khaled Suleiman, an analyst in northern Iraq, said that despite the new fissure in Kurdish politics, Kurdish parties would speak with a single voice in Baghdad, “especially on issues related to Kurdish destiny.”

The presidency may be another bargaining chip.

Kurds have reacted angrily to assertions from some Arab politicians, including Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi, a Sunni Arab, that Iraq’s next president should be an Arab.

They have again put forward Talabani, an elder statesmen and perhaps the most widely embraced Kurdish politician.

“We further believe that the people of Kurdistan, as a major component of Iraq, must be represented,” a statement from the office of the Kurdistan president said.

(Additional reporting by Aseel Kami, Waleed Ibrahim, Suadad al-Salhy and Sherko Raouf in Sulaimaniya; Writing by Missy Ryan and Jim Loney; Editing by Matthew Jones)