US Senator McCain points towards Pakistan military, terror groups link

Calling for a realistic US policy towards Pakistan, Senator John McCain, a former American presidential candidate, on Thursday aired concern over the “troubling connection” between the Pakistani military and terrorist groups in that country.

“The troubling connection remains between Pakistan's military and terrorist groups like the Haqqani network and Lashkar-e-Taiba who are killing Indians, Afghans and Pakistanis,” McCain, the Republican presidential candidate in the 2008 race, told reporters here.

He was sharing his impressions of his visit to Pakistan last week where he met Pakistani leaders, including President Asif Ali Zardari.

Alluding to the ongoing debate in the US about a rethink among the powers-that-be in Washington about its ties with Islamabad, McCain said: “This is a time for intensive reflection about our relations with Paki

stan. The US must develop a realistic relationship with Pakistan.”

McCain, the influential US senator from Arizona who is currently on a visit to India, hoped that Pakistan will emerge “a successful democratic nation” and underlined the need for strengthening democratic civilian rule in that country.

The senator also emphasised that the US had resolved not to let the Taliban return to Afghanistan and was trying to help develop a secure nation that “will not be a base for terrorists”.

McCain met National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon in the morning and discussed a swathe of issues relating to the burgeoning India-US strategic partnership.

“The US has a critical stake in India's success,” McCain said. He expressed confidence that the India-US relationship “can be and should be the indispensable partnership of the 21st century”.

zp8497586rq

Biden says no hard feelings toward McChrystal

July 18 (Reuters) – U.S. Vice President Joe Biden said on Sunday it was too soon to judge if a surge of U.S. troops into Afghanistan was winning the war and insisted he bore no ill will toward General Stanley McChrystal.

President Barack Obama fired McChrystal last month after a magazine interview in which members of a team led by the top U.S. general in Afghanistan belittled Biden and called Obama’s national security adviser a “clown.”

“I wasn’t the clown. I was the guy who, in fact, was their problem, they thought. I’m not their problem,” Biden told ABC News’ “This Week” program.

McChrystal’s interview with Rolling Stone magazine exposed divisions between the White House and the military on how to conduct the Afghan war.

A member of his team joked about the vice president. “Biden?” the aide was quoted as saying. “Did you say: ‘Bite me?’” Another aide called national security adviser Jim Jones a clown who was “stuck in 1985.”

“I didn’t take it personally at all. I really, honest to God, didn’t. Compared to what happens in politics, this is — that was a piece of cake,” Biden said.

But Biden said the situation left McChrystal in an untenable position and that six four-star generals had advised the vice president that he must go.

“I met with McChrystal. The president met with McChrystal. He was — he was really apologetic. He knew they had gone way beyond. But we also knew that if a sergeant did that, if a lieutenant did that — I mean no one could stay,” Biden said.

Obama replaced McChrystal by putting General David Petraeus in charge of the war in Afghanistan.

U.S. troops are encountering stiff resistance and mounting casualties from a resurgent Taliban, despite a six-month buildup in U.S. forces. But Biden said it was too early to say if the strategy was working or not.

“We knew it was going to be a tough slog. But I think it’s much too premature to make a judgment until the military said we should look at it, which is in December,” Biden said, adding that it would take until August to complete the troop surge.

(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Eric Walsh)

Conference on Mideast WMD ban gets go ahead

Signatories of a global anti-nuclear arms treaty — nearly all of the world’s nations — called on Friday for a conference in 2012 to discuss banning weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East.

The creation of such a zone could ultimately force Israel to sign the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and abandon any atomic weapons it has.

But U.S. officials, disappointed at efforts to single out the Jewish state, made clear the proposal might go nowhere, saying the Middle East could not be declared WMD-free until there was broad Arab-Israeli peace and Iran curbed its nuclear program.

The call came in a declaration adopted by consensus by all 189 parties to the treaty, including the United States, after a month-long meeting in New York to review the NPT that at times had seemed on the brink of failure.

The 28-page document said U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and key states would arrange a conference that would include all nations in the region, by implication including bitter foes Israel and Iran.

At the same time, the declaration urged Israel to sign the NPT and put its nuclear facilities under U.N. safeguards, and also called on India and Pakistan, which have exploded nuclear devices, to join the pact.

The chief U.S. delegate at the meeting, Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher, had opposed naming Israel in the declaration, saying it undermined the idea of the 2012 conference.

But Washington ultimately acquiesced on that point.

FOCUS ON ISRAEL

Afterwards, Washington — named as one of the co-sponsors of the proposed conference — quickly cast doubt on its chances of ever taking place.

While welcoming agreements on a range of non-proliferation issues at the U.N. meeting, U.S. President Barack Obama said: “We strongly oppose efforts to single out Israel, and will oppose actions that jeopardize Israel’s national security.”

U.S. national security adviser Jim Jones criticized the “gratuitous” attention paid to Israel and said it was deplorable that the resolution failed to mention Iran as the “greatest threat of nuclear proliferation” in the region.

Israel is presumed to have a sizable nuclear arsenal but neither confirms nor denies it. It is the only Middle East state that has not signed the NPT and, like India and Pakistan, did not participate in the review conference.

Tauscher said Washington would work with countries in the region to organize a successful conference in 2012.

But she added that the U.S. ability to do that “has been seriously jeopardized because the final document singles out Israel in the Middle East section, a fact that the United States deeply regrets.”

Gary Samore, who oversees policy on weapons of mass destruction at the White House, said U.S. Vice President Joe Biden had warned Arab ambassadors in Washington this week that naming Israel in the final document would be a bad idea.

“The political symbolism of mentioning Israel in this way is very destructive,” he told reporters on a conference call.

“I don’t know whether this conference will even happen,” Samore said. “We’re not going to convene a meeting unless we believe the conditions are right for having that meeting.”

There was no immediate reaction from Israel.

‘DIFFICULT COMPROMISE’

The White House insisted it would not put the Jewish state under any pressure nor encourage it to do anything that would undermine its national security. It also denied entering into a deal with Egypt and other Arab states on the WMD-free zone.

“There is no deal between the U.S. and Egypt or any countries with regard to that particular issue,” Jones told Reuters in Washington.

Diplomats familiar with the talks, however, told Reuters the United States had agreed with the Arabs not to block consensus on the declaration while making clear it would condemn the naming of Israel.

British delegate John Duncan told the meeting the text on the Middle East had involved “difficult compromise for all parties involved.”

U.N. diplomats have said that one of the reasons Washington agreed to negotiate with the Arabs on the WMD-free zone was to secure their support for new U.N. sanctions against Iran.

Tauscher said that “Iran is the only country in this hall that has been found … to be currently in non-compliance with its (NPT) nuclear safeguards obligations.”

The declaration also contained plans for further disarmament, strengthening global non-proliferation efforts and ensuring access to technology for peaceful uses.

The 1970 NPT is intended to stop the spread of atomic weapons, though it allowed the United States, Britain, France, China and Russia to keep their arsenals while calling on them to negotiate on disarmament.

The conference called on North Korea to give up nuclear weapons and return to the NPT, which it left in 2003.

(Additional reporting by Matt Spetalnick in Washington; editing by Eric Beech and Mohammad Zargham)

Homegrown terror threats to be part of US security strategy

With Al-Qaeda and its affiliates recruiting American citizens to carry out attacks in the country, the US will for the first time include the threat posed by radicalised, homegrown terrorism into its national security strategy.

John Brennan, deputy national security adviser for counter-terrorism and homeland security, said the Obama administration would add combating homegrown terrorism to its new strategy, which will be unveiled tomorrow.

“We’ve seen an increasing number of individuals here in the United States become captivated by extremist activities or causes,” Brennan said at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“The president’s national security strategy explicitly recognises the threat to the United States posed by individuals radicalised here at home,” he said.

His comments assume significance in the wake of the arrest of Faisal Shahzad, the Pakistani-American, for plotting the failed Times Square bombing. He has admitted to attending a terrorist training camp in Pakistan’s Waziristan tribal region.

Brennan said the US has seen a number of people who were inspired by the extremist ideologies or causes.

“(The examples are) Somali Americans from Minnesota travelling to fight in Somalia, the five Virginia men who went to Pakistan seeking terrorist training, David Headley, the Chicago man charged with helping to plan the Mumbai attacks, the Pennsylvania woman, JihadJane, charged with conspiring to murder a Danish cartoonist,” he said.

He also noted that more than 20 individuals in the US have been arrested and charged with terrorism crimes, their plans and plots disrupted since the Obama Administration assumed office in January 2009.

This includes Najibullah Zazi, who planned to attack the New York subway system in what could have been the worst terrorist attack on our soil since 9/11.

Brennan said the the US is at war with Al-Qaeda and its terrorists allies, who continue to plot against America and its allies along the border regions and inside of Pakistan.

“The United States of America is at war. We are at war against Al-Qaeda and its terrorist affiliates…That is why he has refocused our efforts on Afghanistan, where Al-Qaeda continues to plot from the tribal regions along the border with Pakistan and inside of Pakistan,” he said.

“We will deny Al-Qaeda and its affiliates safe haven. We will secure the world’s most dangerous weapons, especially the nuclear materials that Al-Qaeda seeks and would surely use against us.”

Brennan said the US was not only delivering severe blows against the leadership of Al-Qaeda and its affiliates, but is helping the countries where these organisations have safe havens to build their capacity to provide for their own security and to help them root out the “Al-Qaeda cancer” that has manifested itself within their borders.

He said since the US has made it harder for the terror outfits to recruit they are increasingly relying on recruits with little training.

“We have strengthened our defenses against massive, sophisticated attacks on our homeland, so they are attempting attacks with little sophistication, but with very lethal intent,” he argued.

“Knowing that it is harder to penetrate America’s defenses, they use the Internet and extremist websites to exhort people already living in the United States to take up arms and launch terrorist attacks from within,” Brennan said.

“We have seen individuals, including US citizens, armed with their US passports, travel easily to extremist safe havens and return to America, their deadly plans disrupted by coordinated intelligence and law enforcement,” he said.

“Unfortunately, we were unable to thwart Faisal Shahzad, accused of attempting to set off the car bomb in Times Square,” Brennan said.

He said the US has also seen individuals, including American citizens, apparently inspired by Al-Qaeda’s ideology and take matters into their own hands.

“Again, we have disrupted a number of these plots, including individuals in Texas and Illinois charged with planning to blow up buildings,” he said.

Strategy and timing of North Waziristan offensive Pak’s discretion: NATO

Islamabad, May 21 (ANI): A top North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) official has said that it is for Pakistan to decide as to when it wants to launch an offensive against the Taliban and other extremists in North Waziristan.

“It is for Pakistan to set its strategy and the timings,” The Daily Times quoted NATO’s deputy assistant secretary general Robert Simmons, as saying.

Pakistan has already made it clear that it would not succumb to any pressure from the United States as regards the timing of the offensive in the Taliban’s stronghold, and that any decision in this regard would be ‘sovereign’.

“Be it the Tribal Areas or any other part, Pakistan will proceed in accordance with its own priorities and plans.” Foreign Office (FO) spokesperson Abdul Basit said while responding to a question whether Islamabad would launch a full-fledged military offensive in North Waziristan, the Taliban stronghold, for which the Obama administration has been piling pressure on it.

“Be it the Tribal Areas or any other part, Pakistan will proceed in accordance with its own priorities and plans,” Basit said during a regular press briefing here.

It may be noted that President Obama’s top two security advisors National Security Adviser General James Jones and Central Investigation Agency (CIA) chief Leon Panetta were recently in Islamabad with a White House’ message that Pakistan, without wasting any more time, should initiate an operation against the extremists flourishing in the tribal regions along the Afghanistan border. (ANI)

North Waziristan offensive Pak’s ‘sovereign’ decision: FO

Islamabad, May 21 (ANI): Pakistan has made it clear that it would not succumb to any pressure from the United States about when to launch an offensive in North Waziristan, and that any decision in this regard would be ‘sovereign’.

“Be it the Tribal Areas or any other part, Pakistan will proceed in accordance with its own priorities and plans.” Foreign Office (FO) spokesperson Abdul Basit said while responding to a question whether Islamabad would launch a full-fledged military offensive in North Waziristan, the Taliban stronghold, for which the Obama administration has been piling up pressure on it.

“Be it the Tribal Areas or any other part, Pakistan will proceed in accordance with its own priorities and plans,” Basit said during a regular press briefing here.

It may be noted that President Obama’s top two security advisors National Security Adviser General James Jones and Central Investigation Agency (CIA) chief Leon Panetta were recently in Islamabad with a White House’ message that Pakistan, without wasting any more time, should initiate an operation against the extremists flourishing in the tribal regions along the Afghanistan border.

Responding to a question regarding the massive increase in number of US officials in Pakistan, he said except India there was no fixed quota for diplomatic presence of any other country.

“Pakistan and India have a mutual agreement about maximum number of personnel in their respective high commissions in Islamabad and New Delhi,” The Daily Times quoted Basit, as saying. (ANI)

US forces Pak into new anti-Taliban war

After intense pressure from the United States, Pakistan has reportedly agreed to launch a full-scale offensive against the Taliban and other extremist organisations in their stronghold North Waziristan, but has also clarified to the Obama administration that the timing of the military offensive would be decided by it.

A top Pakistani official confirmed that during the meeting between US National Security Adviser General James Jones and Central Investigation Agency (CIA) chief Leon Panetta and President Asif Ali Zardari, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Chief of the Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, the Pakistani leadership agreed to expand the counterinsurgency offensive to North Waziristan.

US Ambassador to Pakistan Anne Patterson also attended the meeting.

“Pakistan is sincere and committed in combating terrorism and is ready to expand its anti-militancy operations to North Waziristan. However, for that we will require time to do the necessary shaping up. The operation will be started according to our own judgment,” The Dawn quoted the official, as saying.

A joint statement issued after the meeting also confirmed that Islamabad is ready to open a new front against militants in the volatile tribal region.

“Discussions focused on measures that both the countries (the US and Pakistan) are, and will be, taking to confront the common threat we face from extremists and prevent such potential attacks from occurring again. Both sides pledged to do everything possible to protect our citizens,” the statement said.

Sources privy to the meeting said Pakistan’s civilian and military leadership categorically told Obama’s top security aides that the country’s armed forces were not in a position to move immediately into North Waziristan because of a number of limitations, including efforts being made to consolidate gains made in the areas cleared of the Taliban and capacity and resource issues.

Pak agrees ‘in principle’ for North Waziristan offensive under intense US pressure

Islamabad, May 20 (ANI): After intense pressure from the United States, Pakistan has reportedly agreed to launch a full-scale offensive against the Taliban and other extremist organisations in their stronghold North Waziristan, but has also clarified to the Obama administration that the timing of the military offensive would be decided by it.

A top Pakistani official confirmed that during the meeting between US National Security Adviser General James Jones and Central Investigation Agency (CIA) chief Leon Panetta and President Asif Ali Zardari, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Chief of the Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, the Pakistani leadership agreed to expand the counterinsurgency offensive to North Waziristan.

US Ambassador to Pakistan Anne Patterson also attended the meeting.

“Pakistan is sincere and committed in combating terrorism and is ready to expand its anti-militancy operations to North Waziristan. However, for that we will require time to do the necessary shaping up. The operation will be started according to our own judgment,” The Dawn quoted the official, as saying.

A joint statement issued after the meeting also confirmed that Islamabad is ready to open a new front against militants in the volatile tribal region.

“Discussions focused on measures that both the countries (the US and Pakistan) are, and will be, taking to confront the common threat we face from extremists and prevent such potential attacks from occurring again. Both sides pledged to do everything possible to protect our citizens,” the statement said.

Sources privy to the meeting said Pakistan’s civilian and military leadership categorically told Obama’s top security aides that the country’s armed forces were not in a position to move immediately into North Waziristan because of a number of limitations, including efforts being made to consolidate gains made in the areas cleared of the Taliban and capacity and resource issues. (ANI)

US tells Pak to take out terror groups radicalising people to strike against west

Washington, May 19 (ANI): The United States wants Pakistan to take on the extremist organisations which radicalise disgruntled Pakistani civilians living in foreign countries and use them for terror activities targeted at the west, particularly America and Europe.

According to sources, this would be the message that the two senior security aides of President Barack Obama, National Security Adviser General James Jones and Central Investigation Agency (CIA) Director Leon Panetta, would be giving to the Pakistani leadership during their visit.

General Jones and Panetta arrived in Islamabad on Tuesday (May 18), and are likely to meet both the civilian and military leadership during their visit.

While certain sections of the media reported that both the top US officials visit is linked with the May 1 failed Times Square bombing plot, but observers believe that the high-profile visit has more to do than what it seems.

“This (Times Square probe) is not such a sophisticated or complicated case that the White House should send its national security adviser and the CIA chief all the way to Islamabad. They are there to look at the bigger picture and to discuss with Pakistani officials the greater context of this issue,” The Dawn quoted sources, privy to the development, as saying.

The basic concept of the message that General Jones and Panetta are believed to have brought with them is the same as that of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s, sources added.

In a recent television interview, Clinton had warned that Pakistan would have to face “very severe consequences” if a successful terror attack on the US is traced back to Pakistan. (ANI)

Manmohan, Gilani begin meeting in Thimphu

Thimphu (Bhutan), Apr.29 (ANI): The much awaited meeting between the Prime Ministers of India and Pakistan began here a short while ago on the sidelines of the XVIth SAARC Summit.

This the first meeting between the two leaders after their meeting in the Egyptian resort of Sharm-el-Sheikh in July 2009.

Both leaders are being assisted at the talks by their respective senior officials.

The Indian side includes National Security Adviser Shiv Shankar Menon, Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao, India”s High Commissioner to Pakistan Sharad Sabharwal and senior officials of the Prime Minister”s Office.

The Pakistan side includes Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir, senior officials of the Pakistan Foreign Office and Pakistan”s High Commissioner to India Shahid Malik.

The two sides are expected to discuss a wide range of issues, including terrorism and the water dispute settlement etc.

A media briefing on what transpired at the meeting is expected in a short while from now.

Earlier in the day, Indian External Affairs MInister S M Krishna had said that New Delhi wants good relations with Pakistan.

Speaking ahead of the bilateral talks between Indian Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani counterpart Yousuf Raza Gilani, Krishna said there was no point reacting to remarks made by the Pakistan Foreign Office spokesman Abdul Basit or anyone else representing Islamabad.

“We are not going to react on the remarks made by anybody and everybody,” the minister said.

Basit had last night said that India and Pakistan should follow-up from the talks held at the Egyptian resort of Sharm-el-Sheikh in July in 2009 and it should be the foundation of any talks between India and Pakistan.

“Our expectation is that the meeting would result in a meaningful and irreversible engagement between the two countries,” Basit told mediapersons here on Wednesday on the sidelines of the XVIth SAARC Summit.

“We want both countries to come to an agreement,” he added.

While Pakistan is insisting that the Sharm-al-Sheikh document, which delinks terrorism from composite dialogue, should be the basis for talks, India is sticking to its position that there can be no composite dialogue, but only a channel of communication open till Pakistan takes credible action against the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks in Mumbai.

“Dialogue is the only way forward. And secondly, the peace process should not be overshadowed by issues of terrorism,” Basit said.

According to the reliable sources, it is going to be a brief affair in terms of bilateral talks between India and Pakistan before the concluding session of SAARC Summit. (ANI)

US National Security Adviser says sorry for Jewish joke

Washington, Apr.27 (ANI): US National Security Adviser, Lt. Gen (retired) James Jones, has apologized for a Jewish joke that he made last week to kick off an address.

According to a Christian Science Monitor (CSM) report, when Lt. Gen. Jones made the joke, the room erupted in laughter at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a pro-Israel organization.

Apparently not everyone in the room was amused, and by Monday, when the Israeli paper Haaretz published a story, a full-fledged international incident was born.

On Monday, Jones issued an apology. In addition, the White House did not include the off-the-cuff joke in its official transcript of his remarks.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs denied any cover-up.

“It was obviously an on-camera speech. There was no attempt to deceive,” Gibbs said as per a Fox News report.

“I wish that I had not made this off the cuff joke at the top of my remarks, and I apologize to anyone who was offended by it. It also distracted from the larger message I carried that day: that the United States commitment to Israel”s security is sacrosanct,” Jones said. (ANI)

Mideast peace would thwart Iran ambitions – Obama aide

President Barack Obama’s administration said on Wednesday that progress toward Middle East peace would help thwart Iran’s ambitions by preventing it from “cynically” using the conflict to divert attention from its nuclear program.

Drawing an explicit link between Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts and Washington’s drive to isolate Iran, Obama’s national security adviser, Jim Jones, urged bold steps to revive long-stalled Middle East negotiations.

U.S. officials hope that shared Arab-Israeli concerns about Iran can be exploited to spur old foes to help advance Israeli-Palestinian peace and restrain Tehran’s nuclear activities and rising influence in the region.

Jones coupled an appeal to Israel and its Arab neighbours to take risks for peace with a warning to Iran that it would face “real consequences” for its nuclear defiance. Obama is leading a push to tighten U.N. sanctions on Tehran.

“One of the ways that Iran exerts influence in the Middle East is by exploiting the ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict,” Jones told the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

“Advancing this peace would … help prevent Iran from cynically shifting attention away from its failures to meet its obligations,” he said.

The Israeli government, locked in a dispute with the United States over Jewish settlement policy, has made clear it sees confronting Iran as more of a security priority for Washington, and Middle East peace should be handled on a separate track.

Jones — while voicing disappointment over the failure to jumpstart U.S.-sponsored indirect peace talks — insisted progress toward peace is a U.S. interest as well.

That seemed to echo Obama’s assertion last week that a two-state solution to the decades-old conflict was “a vital national security interest,” adding to speculation that he was considering his own broad peace proposal.

U.S.-ISRAELI BOND “UNBREAKABLE”

While acknowledging disagreements with Israel, Jones said the U.S. commitment to its ally was “unbreakable.”

“There is no space — no space — between the United States and Israel when it comes to Israel’s security,” he said.

Still, he urged all sides “to avoid provocative actions, including Israeli actions in East Jerusalem and Palestinians’ incitement that fuels suspicion rather than trust.”

Jones reasserted that Washington is “determined to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons,” saying U.S. efforts are aimed at “avoiding a nuclear arms race in the region and the proliferation of nuclear technology to terrorist organizations.”

Israel is the only assumed nuclear weapons power in the Middle East. Western powers accuse Tehran of seeking to develop a bomb, but it insists its nuclear activities are peaceful.

The Obama administration’s Middle East peace moves have been stymied by a dispute over Jewish settlement construction in and around Jerusalem and by divisions among the Palestinians.

Washington has tried to get Israel and the Palestinians to launch “proximity” talks but has made scant headway. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gave little ground in White House talks with Obama last month.

(Additional reporting by Phil Stewart; editing by Chris Wilson)

Rehman Malik had significant role in Bhutto’s security management: Report

Lahore, Apr 19(ANI): The Benazir Bhutto Commission Report has found that Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik, who was in charge of former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, had a significant role in her security management.

Malik told the commission that he was just the Pakistan People”s Party (PPP) leader’s “national security adviser”, but the commission report said “occupants of the car, not least Malik, should realise that they have been found wanting.”

“It is now up to them to decide whether or not falling on their swords is the right thing to do,” The Dawn quoted the Commission’s report, as stating.

The commission report also makes clear that the primary blame for the inadequate security around Bhutto must lie with then-President General Musharraf’s government.

“Despite considerable and valiant efforts by individual PPP members to protect Bhutto, the PPP as an organisation was inadequate to handle the challenges. There was no person in overall charge of the PPP’s provision of security. As a result, the PPP’s security for Bhutto was characterised by a lack of direction and professionalism,” it said.

Bhutto was assassinated on December 27, 2007 after departing a PPP rally in Rawalpindi, two weeks before the scheduled Pakistani general election of 2008, where she was a leading opposition candidate.

The PPP has held Musharraf for not providing adequate security cover to Bhutto despite having information about the impending threat to her life.

They have also insisted that steps would be taken to bring back Musharraf, if he was found responsible for the tragic incident. (ANI)

Rehman Malik had significant role in Bhutto’s security management: Report

Lahore, Apr 19(ANI): The Benazir Bhutto Commission Report has found that Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik, who was in charge of former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, had a significant role in her security management.

Malik told the commission that he was just the Pakistan People”s Party (PPP) leader’s “national security adviser”, but the commission report said “occupants of the car, not least Malik, should realise that they have been found wanting.”

“It is now up to them to decide whether or not falling on their swords is the right thing to do,” The Dawn quoted the Commission’s report, as stating.

The commission report also makes clear that the primary blame for the inadequate security around Bhutto must lie with then-President General Musharraf’s government.

“Despite considerable and valiant efforts by individual PPP members to protect Bhutto, the PPP as an organisation was inadequate to handle the challenges. There was no person in overall charge of the PPP’s provision of security. As a result, the PPP’s security for Bhutto was characterised by a lack of direction and professionalism,” it said.

Bhutto was assassinated on December 27, 2007 after departing a PPP rally in Rawalpindi, two weeks before the scheduled Pakistani general election of 2008, where she was a leading opposition candidate.

The PPP has held Musharraf for not providing adequate security cover to Bhutto despite having information about the impending threat to her life.

They have also insisted that steps would be taken to bring back Musharraf, if he was found responsible for the tragic incident. (ANI)

Diplomat sparks bomb scare with cigarette

US air marshals subdued a Qatari diplomat on a flight to Denver in a bomb scare triggered after he reportedly smoked a cigarette and then joked he was trying to ignite his shoes, officials say.

The plane landed safely at Denver International Airport following the disturbance, and US officials later said it appeared the passenger was not trying to blow up the plane, although the incident was under investigation.

The man was identified in US media reports as Qatari diplomat Mohammed al-Modadi, 27, who as the third secretary and vice consul of the Qatari embassy in Washington enjoys full diplomatic immunity.

NBC News reported the man had simply said he was putting out a cigarette he had smoked in the restroom on the sole of his shoe. Smoking is prohibited on all US passenger flights.

American ABC News said the diplomat told marshals “I’m lighting my shoes on fire”.

NBC News said a search of the man found no explosives and that bomb-sniffing dogs found no traces of explosives aboard the aircraft.

A US security official acknowledged “it may have been a massive misunderstanding,” telling American ABC that Mr al-Modadi may have been making a “sarcastic” comment when he was confronted by two air marshals.

The FBI was investigating the incident.

Qatar’s ambassador to Washington, Ali Bin Fajad al-Hajari, said in a statement that the diplomat was travelling to Denver on official embassy business.

“He was certainly not engaged in any threatening activity,” the ambassador said.

“The facts will reveal that this was a mistake, and we urge all concerned parties to avoid reckless judgments or speculation.”

The scare prompted fighter jets to scramble and intercept the flight amid fears of a possible repeat of a passenger’s foiled attempt to bring down a Northwest Airlines jet on Christmas Day as it approached to land at Detroit.

“The president was briefed by national security adviser General Jim Jones and national security chief of staff Denis McDonough at 8:50pm EDT and appropriate actions were taken to ensure the safety of the travelling public,” a White House official said.

“The incident is currently under investigation.”

US president Barack Obama was aboard Air Force One at the time, en route to Prague to sign a nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) said the passenger was placed in custody, adding it was “monitoring” the incident.

The incident came a week after the United States unveiled new security measures subjecting all US-bound plane passengers to screening methods that use real-time intelligence to target potential threats, replacing the mandatory screening of passengers from a blacklist of 14 mainly Muslim countries.

India, China capable enough about readdressing boundary issue: Menon

New Delhi, Apr 1 (ANI): National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon Thursday said both India and China are confident enough about readdressing the boundary issue, which is a most complicated and difficult one, affecting bilateral relations.

Addressing a seminar on “India and China: Public Diplomacy, Building Understanding,” organised to mark the 60th anniversary of the Indo-China diplomatic ties, Menon said: “Both countries were confident enough to re-address the most complicated and difficult issue that affects bilateral relations, the India-China boundary question, at the political level.

“It was decided to entrust the issue to Special Representatives of the leaders” he added.

Menon”s statement came just days before External Affairs Minister S M Krishna’s Beijing visit.

During Krishna’s Beijing visit from April 5, both sides are likely to discuss dates for the 14th round of boundary negotiations between their Special Representatives.

Menon further said both countries have found ways to solve the boundary issue.

“The two countries have found a modus vivendi to deal with the fact of the boundary issue and to manage their different approaches to issues where their peripheries overlap,” he said.

In his address, Menon stressed that India and China can now consider the next steps in the evolution of bilateral ties.

“Both countries can now actively consider together the next steps in the evolution of our bilateral relations; evolve a detailed framework for the resolution of the boundary issue in a manner that is politically feasible for both leaderships; and, seize the opportunities for cooperation that the domestic transformations of our economies and the evolving global situation have opened up,” he said.

Menon said beginning with Foreign Minister Vajpayee’s 1979 visit to China and culminating in Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi’s visit to China in 1988, Indian and Chinese leaders decided that difficult and complicated boundary question would be addressed, “but would not stand in the way of the expansion of relations in other areas, including the economy and functional cooperation.”

Acknowledging that there are differences on many issues between India and China, Menon underlined the need for building congruences between both countries, while managing differences.

“Differences in worldview, structure, systems and foreign policy making have not prevented and will not prevent an expanding engagement between India and China,” he said. (ANI)

Pak against Taliban gaining control in Afghanistan: Qureshi

Washington, Mar.27 (ANI): Rejecting the notion that Islamabad is providing ‘covert’ support to the Taliban in Afghanistan against foreign forces, Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi has said there was a time when his country was ‘comfortable’ with the Taliban government, but it now does not want the insurgents to take control of the neighbouring nation.

In an interview with the National Public Radio, Qureshi said Pakistan wants peace and stability in Afghanistan, and would take all necessary steps in this regard in accordance with the country’s wishes.

“We are going to do whatever we can do to achieve the objective of a peaceful, stable, friendly Afghanistan,” Qureshi said.

Qureshi insisted that since the establishment of a democratic government in the country things have changed and that Pakistan is striving to be a “moderate, democratic voice”.

“What the American people need to understand is that people and democracy in Pakistan are getting their act together,” he said.

Later, talking to reporters after a meeting with US Vice-President Joe Biden, Qureshi said after meeting the top US diplomats during the strategic dialogue he believes that the Obama Administration is committed to strengthen ties with Islamabad.

“We exchanged views on the discussions we had at the strategic dialogue and his (Biden’s) expression of support reinforced my understanding that this administration is ready to turn bilateral relations into a partnership,” Qureshi said.

Biden had dropped in a White House meeting between National Security Adviser James Jones and top Pakistani officials including Qureshi, Defence Minister Ahmed Mukhtar, Army Chief General Ashfaq Kayani and Pakistan’s Ambassador in the US Hussain Haqqani. (ANI)

Obama’s healthcare win could boost foreign policy

President Barack Obama’s domestic success on healthcare reform may pay dividends abroad as the strengthened U.S. leader taps his momentum to take on international issues with allies and adversaries.

More than a dozen foreign leaders have congratulated Obama on the new healthcare law in letters and phone calls, a sign of how much attention the fight for his top domestic policy priority received in capitals around the world.

Analysts and administration officials were cautious about the bump Obama could get from such a win: Iran is not going to rethink its nuclear program and North Korea is not going to return to the negotiating table simply because more Americans will get health insurance in the coming years, they said.

But the perception of increased clout, after a rocky first year that produced few major domestic or foreign policy victories, could generate momentum for Obama’s agenda at home and in his talks on a host of issues abroad.

“It helps him domestically and I also think it helps him internationally that he was able to win and get through a major piece of legislation,” said Stephen Hadley, former national security adviser to Republican President George W. Bush.

“It shows political strength, and that counts when dealing with foreign leaders.”

Obama’s deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said the Democratic president’s persistence in the long healthcare battle added credibility to his rhetoric on climate change, nuclear nonproliferation and other foreign policy goals.

“It sends a very important message about President Obama as a leader,” Rhodes told Reuters during an interview in his West Wing office.

“The criticism has been: (He) sets big goals but doesn’t close the deal. So, there’s no more affirmative answer to that criticism than closing the biggest deal you have going.”

Foreign policy dividends have been minimal in the short amount of time since he signed the healthcare bill into law on Tuesday.

Exhibit A: a one-on-one meeting this week between Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, a country that closely tracks U.S. domestic policy, yielded little sign of a breakthrough in a dispute over Jewish housing construction on occupied land in Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem.

A FOREIGN POLICY SUCCESS, TOO

Still, some specific foreign policy successes are looming.

U.S. and Russian officials say Washington and Moscow are close to announcing an agreement on a nuclear arms reduction treaty, which would require a two-thirds majority in the U.S. Senate for ratification.

Some analysts said Russia was watching Obama’s domestic successes and failures throughout the process.

“I think there were some in the Kremlin saying, ‘how strong is he? If he can’t get some of these things through, does that give us more leverage to push him on arms control?’” said Steven Pifer, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine and now a senior fellow at the Washington-based Brookings Institution.

Administration officials played down a connection between healthcare and talks with Russia on the START nuclear arms treaty, though Rhodes said the processes that led to success on both issues were similar.

“Like healthcare, the START treaty has been a negotiation where at times we seemed very close to getting a deal done and then there were huge roadblocks,” Rhodes said, crediting Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for sticking it out.

“So, it was a similar narrative of persistence, of refusing to throw in the towel at times when he could have.”

Foreign leaders have noted the persistence.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown were among the leaders who congratulated Obama, and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak said the healthcare win would have a positive impact abroad, according to White House spokesman Robert Gibbs.

Analysts said the bill’s passage showed Obama could deliver votes for domestic legislation with foreign policy components, such as rules to fight climate change, currently stalled in the Senate, which European leaders are eager to see advance.

James Lindsay, senior vice president at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, who was sceptical that Obama’s healthcare win would have a huge foreign policy benefit, said the law did free up the president to focus less on purely domestic issues.

“If the president had lost on healthcare, it would have further sapped his popularity as president, requiring him to spend even more time on domestic affairs and left him with less time to devote to foreign policy,” he said.

“That’s not the same as saying that because the healthcare bill has passed that the Iranians are going to be more pliable in their nuclear program, that the Israelis are going to rethink their settlement policy or the Chinese are going to become more agreeable on currency issues.”

(Editing by Xavier Briand)

Pak took up issue of India’s ‘intrusion’ in Afghanistan with US : Gilani

Islamabad, Mar.25 (ANI): Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani has said that Islamabad has taken up the issue of India’s ‘intrusion’ in Afghanistan with both New Delhi and the United States.

Addressing the Senate, Gilani said he had a detailed meeting with US National Security Adviser General. James Jones over India’s expanding presence in Afghanistan.

Pakistan has been blaming India for using Afghan territory to launch terror activities in Pakistan, especially in Balochistan.

Pakistani agencies have also been accusing India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) of plotting terror attacks across the country using Indian consulates in Afghanistan.

Recently, Pakistani intelligence officials claimed that they had nabbed the mastermind of the Lahore serial blasts, in which over 50 persons were killed earlier this month, who revealed that the attacks were planned two months ago in an Indian consulate in Afghanistan.

Pakistani agencies also claimed that a top Indian official had visited Kabul in December and met Muzammal, who had fled to Afghanistan via Balochistan after the attack on the General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi in 2009. (ANI)

New Delhi, Mar. 15 (ANI): The expected face-off between the UPA Government and the Opposition over the former”s proposed Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill has fizzled out with the UPA saying it will not table the Bill that provides for compensation in case of a nuclear accident for discussion today.

The BJP and the Left have already indicated opposition to the Bill that is key to operationalise the landmark Indo-US nuclear deal. Senior BJP leader L.K. Advani said the Government must give reasons for not tabling the Bill for a discussion, when it already figures in the day”s listed business.

The Bill pegs the maximum amount of liability in case of each nuclear accident at Rs 300 crore to be paid by the operator of the nuclear plant.

However, the draft bill also has provisions that would enable the government to either increase or decrease the amount of liability of any operator.

“At the introduction itself we will oppose unless the government assures us that it would be sent to a Parliamentary Standing Committee,” a private television channel quoted CPI(M) politburo member Sitaram Yechury, as saying.

The BJP is also understood to have expressed concern over the Rs 300 crore limits in the liability of the nuclear power plant operator.

“All these issues are there and we will discuss all that in the standing committee,” said Yechury when asked about the Rs 300 crore limits.

Reports had it that the government was keen on getting the Bill passed in the ongoing budget session itself.

National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon had met BJP leader Arun Jaitley to brief him about the Bill, but the main opposition is yet to have all its concerns addressed.

Jaitley is understood to have given a list of queries regarding the Bill to Menon but was yet to get any reply.

The Bill was approved by the Union Cabinet on November 20 last year.

According to the provisions in the draft legislation, the operator would not be liable for any nuclear damage if the incident was caused by “grave national disaster of exceptional character”, armed conflict or act of terrorism and suffered by person on account of his own negligence.

Former Atomic Energy Commission Chairman and key architect of the Indo-US nuclear deal Anil Kakodkar feels that the liability limit is optimum.

The Bill also provides for establishment of Nuclear Damage Claims Commission which will have one or more claims commissioners for a specified area.

The claims commissioner shall have all powers of a civil court for the purpose of taking evidence on oath, enforcing attendance of witnesses, compelling the discovery and production of documents and other material objects.

Environment activists have described as a violation of fundamental rights the proposed attempt to cap the level of compensation to victims of a nuclear accident. “Under Article 21 of the Constitution, there is no warrant or justification for capping nuclear liability,” noted jurist Soli Sorabjee said in his opinion to Greenpeace.

Issues relating to the remaining steps of the nuclear deal — reprocessing pact and civil liability legislation — are expected to be key points in Prime Minister Manmohan Singh”s agenda when he meets US President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Nuclear Security Summit next month.

After award of compensation, the operator has the right to appeal in three cases, one of which is when he argues that the incident resulted from “willful act or gross negligence” of a supplier of material, equipment or services.

The right to claim compensation has a limit of 10 years from the date of incident. The exception is of stolen, lost, jettisoned or abandoned nuclear material, where the period is increased to 20 years.

The government is expected to argue that the legislation is necessary as the Atomic Energy Act that governs the nuclear power sector is silent on compensation.

Several insurance companies also do not cover injuries caused due to radiation.

The state-run Nuclear Power Corporation of India that operates all atomic power plants in the country has set aside Rs 500 crore to meet compensation requirements in case of a nuclear incident. (ANI)