Abbott sides with big miners over tax

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott says he cannot see how the Coalition could back the Government’s move to put a 40 per cent tax on mining profits.

Mr Abbott has given his strongest indication so far that the Opposition will block the tax after meeting with senior mining executives in Canberra today.

Mr Abbott has been speaking with BHP Billiton executive Marius Kloppers and Rio Tinto Australia managing director David Peever in Canberra as Prime Minister Kevin Rudd held a series of meetings with mining heavyweights in Perth.

The Government’s announcement on Sunday that it would impose a tax on the above-normal profits of mining companies has been met with outrage from the resources sector and has seen mining stocks plunge.

Emerging from today’s meeting, Mr Abbott said he could see “no way” the Coalition could support the tax.

“I reiterate that I can see no good arguments for this great big new tax,” he said.

“It is a very, very bad tax. The only way to avoid it is to ensure there is a change of government at the next election.”

Overnight London-listed shares in BHP Billiton shed nearly 8 per cent and Rio Tinto shares dropped more than 6 per cent.

The Government has accused the mining industry of running a scare campaign and Mr Rudd has indicated he will not budge from the 40 per cent rate.

“It’s inevitable that mining companies are going to complain,” he said.

“We intend through an extended consultation process to work our way through it.

“A whole range of points of view were put [forward today]. We’ll try and work through the detail of that.”

Greens Leader Bob Brown has urged the Government to stick to its guns.

“The mining corporations have far too much say in the running of this country without being representative, they are a massive lobby on both parties in Canberra,” he said.

“They have the Coalition on a string, but this Labor Government, which stands up for average Australians, should stay strong on what is a proper idea.”

‘Heavy-handed’ tax

Mincor Resources managing director David Moore says the tax will have dire consequences for the industry.

“We can only hope and pray that through the consultation process there’s is a sense returned to how this tax is applied, and hopefully the tax goes away altogether,” he said.

Toro Energy managing director Greg Hall says his company may have to reconsider at least one project.

“We’re evaluating our project in Western Australia on the basis of this additional tax regime and determining what that means for us,” he said.

WA Premier Colin Barnett says the tax should be dropped or scaled back.

“This is very heavy-handed,” he said.

Meanwhile, Canadian finance minister Jim Flaherty says the new tax could benefit his country because investors will seek places to invest that have lower taxes.

Morrison migration remarks ‘not Coalition policy’

Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison says his comments about cutting the country’s migrant intake to curb population growth do not reflect official Coalition policy.

His comments come amid reports that some of his colleagues are angry that his earlier call to reduce migration was made before any discussion with the party room.

Yesterday there were also confusing signals from the Coalition about where it would want to see cuts made.

The business community is unhappy with the comments, arguing that temporary migrant workers are vital for economic growth.

Debate has raged this week over whether Australia can cope with a predicted population of 36 million by 2050, with a survey released today by the Lowy Institute showing that almost 70 per cent of Australians think the figure is too high.

On Tuesday Mr Morrison said migration levels were “out of control” and needed to be “brought back into perspective”.

But he has told ABC’s NewsRadio this morning that his comments are not Coalition policy.

“If there is an interpretation out there that this is a wholesale policy, it’s not a wholesale policy,” he said.

“The way the debate has gone over the last few days, I think there is some misunderstandings about the points that are being made.”

Mr Morrison says the net migration rate is about 300,000 a year, including international students and those on working visas.

He says that rate will push the population much higher than 36 million by 2050.

“The fact is that 300,000 net overseas migration will produce a population in excess of 50 million people. Is that a policy this Government is going to adopt?” he said.

Treasury figures show the population will reach 36 million by 2050 with a permanent net migration intake of 180,000 a year.

When asked yesterday if the Coalition would rein in migration levels, Opposition Leader Tony Abbott did not say.

Mr Abbott said he supported a “strong Australia” but questioned whether the Federal Government was addressing the country’s infrastructure needs for such a large population.

Business Council of Australia spokesman Graham Bradley has told Radio National the skilled migration program should not be cut.

“Australia needs a growing population to develop our economy and to of course offset the issues that will arise as outlined in the intergenerational report about an ageing population,” he said.

“We need a vibrant immigration policy.”

The Lowy Institute survey found that while 72 per cent of Australians support population growth, 69 per cent want to see it reach only 30 million by 2050.

Newly appointed Population Minister Tony Burke says he will be developing a policy that ensures the predicted rise in population is sustainable.

“Obviously it will be a larger population but one which is balanced against the future infrastructure constraints of the country,” he said.

The Government says it has not set a population target.

Abbott’s togs to hang at Alice pub

Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott’s bright red swimming trunks and cap will be put on display in an Alice Springs pub.

Mr Abbott made the outfit famous when he wore them in a race.

Avril Vaughn owns a pub in Alice Springs and bought the ensemble in an online charity auction for $3,400.

She said it was “a lot of money to get into someone’s pants” but it was for a good cause.

The money raised from the sale has gone to the Spastic Centre.

“Alice is full of fun-loving people and they I’m sure will see it for the bit of fun that it is, and a donation to a great cause,” she said.

But she has no great affection for the Liberal Party leader.

“No particular fascination, but I think for a 52-year-old man I thought he sports those Speedos pretty well.”

Abbott makes economic pitch

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has pitched his economic credentials to voters, vowing the next Coalition government will not bow to any resistance against economic reforms.

He also signalled the Coalition may support the Government’s $50 billion hospital takeover plan and says he will release a workplace relations policy “soon”.

In a speech that was light on policy detail but strong on attacks against Government “waste”, Mr Abbott said the overriding priority of the Coalition was to return the budget to surplus.

“Just as Bob Hawke was prepared to argue for floating the dollar and John Howard was prepared to argue for the GST, the next Coalition government must be prepared to argue for necessary reform against the power of vested interests and people’s mistrust of change,” he said.

“Reform can’t be avoided if prosperity is to be secured.”

Mr Abbott said the only economic legacy the Government could lay claim to was that it rolled back the workplace relations reforms of the past two governments.

He ridiculed many of the Government’s spending programs, such as the home insulation program, as a “parody of productive work” and said the global financial crisis was an excuse to spend more.

“GroceryChoice was set up and shut down at a cost of $10 million and the National Broadband Network’s $43 billion investment was announced without even a business plan,” he said.

Mr Abbott pledged all policies would be fully costed and released well before the next election.

He reiterated the Coalition would keep spending below 25 per cent of GDP and would sell Medibank Private to help pay off debt.

Mr Abbott said while the Opposition would continue to oppose the emissions trading scheme and the private health insurance rebate changes, it would “not necessarily” block the hospitals funding takeover, as long as it was not “a great big bureaucracy”.

During last week’s leaders’ debate Mr Rudd accused Mr Abbott of being too negative about the Government’s planned health overhaul.

But Mr Abbott defended his actions, saying it was the Opposition’s job to do so.

“The Opposition can’t avoid sounding negative sometimes because it’s their duty to try to stop or improve poor policy,” he said.

Mr Abbott said he would release the Coalition’s workplace relations policy “soon” and while it would not be the “son of WorkChoices”, it would seek to “restore the balance”.

Before Mr Abbott’s speech today, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd was already on the attack, warning voters Mr Abbott could not be trusted.

“He said that the Liberal Party, under his leadership, would not introduce any new taxes,” Mr Rudd said.

“Five weeks later, Mr Abbott brought about his great big new tax to fund his version of a paid parental leave scheme.”

LNP’s teen candidate hits back at critics

The Queensland teenager pre-selected by the Liberal National Party to fight for one of the state’s most marginal seats at this year’s federal election insists he is the right candidate for the job.

Over the weekend Wyatt Roy, 19, was officially endorsed by the party’s hierarchy to stand in the seat of Longman, north of Brisbane.

That seat, representing an electorate with many seniors, was formerly held by the Liberal minister Mal Brough and is now held by Labor’s Jon Sullivan.

Winning the seat is critical for Federal Opposition Tony Abbott if he is to oust Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.

Many, including Mr Brough, have questioned whether Mr Roy’s age and inexperience will stand against him.

But Mr Roy told ABC Local Radio that he was not worried about criticism of his age.

“I think anybody is entitled to their opinion and certainly Mal is entitled to his opinion,” he said.

“I think what is important is my approach to politics and what I bring is a completely fresh, clean, energised approach to federal politics.”

But Mr Roy, who finished Year 12 in 2007, does have somewhat limited life experience.

“I had two weeks after I finished school and I travelled. I went overseas and went around Europe, as most people do,” he said.

“I then moved interstate and started studying in Melbourne. There [I studied] international relations and then I moved back up to Brisbane to continue my studies.

“I worked in the family business when I came up here.”

Mr Roy says he comes from a farming family of swinging voters but says the politician he most admires is Mr Abbott.

“I really like Tony. I mean Tony Abbott is a straight shooter,” he said.

“[I like him] because he’s real. Too many politicians aren’t real. I mean, politics has become very disenfranchising.”

Big issues

The young aspiring politician was also asked what he thought about tough issues such as climate change.

“I certainly sit with Tony Abbott. … This is something that I’m quite passionate about,” he said.

“Let’s look at the two policies. Tony Abbott is fighting climate change through direct action and an incentive-based approach. All the while Kevin Rudd’s putting a tax on family and small business.”

Mr Roy also takes the party line on asylum seekers.

“It is about the politics of message … We have started to send a message where it is easy to come to this country, not going through the right processes,” he said.

“Now the last thing in the world we want is not to give these people a fair go. They deserve a fair go.

“This comes down to very complicated legislation about how we actually go through the processes of coming to our shores in a legal sense, and then working through that process from being an illegal arrival to being a legitimate arrival.”

Mr Roy says there are still “huge questions” that have not been answered about health.

“You’re talking about a federal takeover. And quite frankly the people in Caboolture, in my electorate, don’t know what Kevin Rudd’s takeover means,” he said.

“Does it mean more bureaucrats or does it mean more beds? We don’t know.”

And he says that part of his job is “getting out there and selling” Mr Abbott’s message on health.

‘Poor recruitment’

Mr Roy won over some listeners this morning, including former Liberal MP Don Cameron, who was voted into the Federal Parliament in 1966 at the age of 26.

“I copped the same thing in being described as a boy,” Mr Cameron said.

“But listening to that young fellow, he runs rings around my capacity at even 26.”

But Australian Catholic University professor of public policy, Scott Prasser, has reservations.

“I think it’s fantastic that young people are interested in politics and this person is obviously very committed and interested in politics,” he said.

“But … here we have one of the most marginal seats in the country, which is potentially winnable at the next federal election.

“What it indicates to me is that the LNP have got very poor recruitment processes.

“Now I think this is an opportunity for the LNP to recruit people of experience, so they can go into Parliament to play the bigger game of spearheading attacks on the Government and developing policy.

“I think a 19-year-old does not have that experience, and I think that is sending a wrong signal to the electorate.”

Abbott ‘still high’ after ironman exertions

An exhausted Tony Abbott is still “on a high” after taking almost 14 hours to complete a gruelling ironman triathlon yesterday.

Mr Abbott finished the 3.8-kilometre swim, 180km cycle and 42km marathon within 14 hours, crossing the finish line at Port Macquarie in New South Wales around 9:00pm AEDT.

Today he told 2GB radio that running across the finish line, albeit at the back of the 1,500-strong pack, made the pain worthwhile.

“I’m still on a bit of a high to be honest,” he said. “It’s a terrific thing to do.”

After suffering from a small panic attack in the swim leg, Mr Abbott then had to face a “howling” headwind once he jumped on his bike.

Thinking of holidays in Port Macquarie with his children kept him going, Mr Abbott said.

He has now been checked over by doctors who say he is doing well.

“They thought to finish the thing and basically be still upright and still compos mentis was pretty good,” he said.

Mr Abbott has copped some flak from the Government for spending too much time exercising instead of working.

But he says the most effective workers “have a life”.

“If you’re chained to the desk eventually you go very, very stale,” he said.

Keneally, O’Farrell accentuate the positive during debate

The New South Wales Premier Kristina Keneally and the Opposition Leader Barry O’Farrell have held a live television debate – exactly one year before the next state election is due to be held.

The latest Galaxy Poll published in the Daily Telegraph shows that Kristina Keneally is popular but the Labor party is not.

However, 40 per cent of respondents believed the Coalition does not deserve to be in government.

The Premier opened today’s televised debate with an appeal to voters to look to the present and future potential of the state.

Mr O’Farrell did not follow the lead of the Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbot in his recent health debate with The Prime Minister.

Mr Abbott was seen to have lost the debate after taking a negative line.

Mr O’Farrell opened with policy promises to create 100,000 jobs, to build the north-west rail link and to cut payroll taxes.

He then challenged the Premier to allow the auditor-general to cost election promises made by both sides in the lead up to next year’s election.

The Liberal leader says he will not be scrapping any projects he promises prior to the election.

“Let’s empower the state’s auditor-general to cost the election promises of the Labor Party and the New South Wales Liberal Party,” he said.

“Let’s level with the public, let’s ensure they have the full information and Kristina, I ask you today to sign up to that proposal.”

Ms Keneally has welcomed the challenge, saying she would love to see the costings of Mr O’Farrell’s promise to cut payroll taxes.

“Auditor-general? Happy to have it done because it will expose … the New South Wales opposition’s approach to campaign promises,” she said.

“Today they go out and they announce a payroll tax cut. He’s not told us how he’s going to pay for that cut.”

Both leaders concluded the debate on an optimistic note.

Ms Keneally said the New South Wales was now “back in front” after the global financial crisis, with unemployment falling and the state maintaining its Triple-A rating.

Mr O’Farrell concluded saying he had great optimism about the state’s future, especially under a Liberal government which would return accountability to government and build long awaited infrastructure.

Joyce shunted in Coalition reshuffle

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has dumped Barnaby Joyce from the finance portfolio, replacing him with Andrew Robb.

Mr Abbott was forced to make the reshuffle just four months into his leadership after Senator Nick Minchin yesterday quit the frontbench and announced he would not contest the next election.

Announcing the changes, Mr Abbott said Senator Joyce had been a “first-class member” of the Coalition team.

“I think that really I’m very lucky to have Barnaby in the frontbench,” he said.

“I think this is a really excellent position for him.

“I want him to be right around Australia. I didn’t want him necessarily chained to a desk costing policies.”

Just yesterday Mr Abbott said Senator Joyce was doing an “outstanding job” in the finance portfolio.

Senator Joyce took up the finance position after Mr Abbott became leader last December, but the often outspoken Senator was seen by some as a risk to the Coalition’s economic credentials.

He will now be spokesman for regional development, infrastructure and water.

And Ian Macfarlane will take on energy and resources.

Senator Minchin’s resignation yesterday also ignited speculation that former leader Malcolm Turnbull would make a frontbench return.

But Mr Abbott says that is not on the cards for now.

“Should we win the election I would anticipate offering Malcolm a senior role,” he said.

“But given that the emissions trading legislation is still before the Parliament I thought it would be premature to bring Malcolm Turnbull back to the frontbench.”

Outspoken senator

There had been speculation Senator Joyce would be moved after criticisms of his performance in the finance portfolio following a series of gaffes.

In a speech to the National Press Club, the Nationals Senator confused millions with billions while discussing the country’s debt levels and once referred to “net gross public and private debt”.

He was also ridiculed by the Government for claiming that Australia could be forced to default on its debts.

And today Queensland Senator Ian Macdonald publicly urged Mr Abbott to consider using Senator Joyce in another portfolio.

Speaking just moments after Mr Abbott’s announcement, Senator Joyce accused some of his own colleagues of backgrounding the media against him.

But he said Mr Abbott did not tell him to go.

“It was an open and honest, frank discussion, which was completely cordial,” he said.

When asked if he was disappointed by the move he replied: “Not really”.

“It’s an increase in workload, to be perfectly truthful,” he added.

Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner was quick to seize on news of the reshuffle to attack Mr Abbott’s economic credibility.

“It took the resignation of a senior member of the Coalition due to personal circumstances to force Mr Abbott to remove Barnaby Joyce from the role,” he said in a statement.

“This demonstrates just how little Mr Abbott cares about the Australian economy by allowing Senator Joyce to retain one of the senior economic positions within the Coalition for more than four months.”

Senator Joyce will still represent the finance portfolio in the Senate.

Mr Robb last year served as the Coalition’s emissions trading spokesman before moving to the backbench because he was suffering from depression.

After Mr Abbott became leader last December Mr Robb took charge of the Coalition’s policy development committee.

Mr Robb says that after five months without a portfolio he is “well and ready to take such responsibilities”.

Mr Robb paid tribute to Senator Minichin and described Senator Joyce as a “significant and effective member of the Coalition”.

“I enjoy a strong working relationship with Barnaby and look forward to his leadership in the regional development, infrastructure and water portfolio,” he said.

Abbott seeks to mend bridges on gay radio

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has appeared on a Melbourne gay and lesbian radio station in an attempt to explain his recent comments about being “threatened” by homosexuality.

On a recent 60 Minutes appearance Mr Abbott said he felt “a bit threatened” when asked about homosexuality.

When asked to clarify his comments a few days later he said homosexuality “challenged the orthodox notions of the right order of things”.

Mr Abbott took to the airwaves of community radio station Joy FM this morning and was quizzed in a wide-ranging and lengthy interview on gay adoption, gay marriage, discrimination laws and homophobia.

He conceded his comments to 60 Minutes were a “poor choice of words”.

“I think blokes of my generation and upbringing do sometimes find these things a bit confronting,” he said.

“But the truth is, as we get older, we mellow.

“People close to me are gay and I’d like to think it hasn’t made me love them any the less or treat them differently.”

Mr Abbott, who once trained in the seminary, says while he was brought up traditionally, he strives to take people as he finds them and is in favour of gay relationships being celebrated and recognised.

Neither the Coalition nor Labor support gay marriage.

Take me as I am, says action man Abbott

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has defended his love of rigorous exercise, saying he is just being himself.

Some senior Liberals are worried Mr Abbott is looking more like an “action man” than a potential prime minister.

And he has been ridiculed in Parliament by the Government for spending too much time on his physique.

Mr Abbott is often seen cycling and surfing and images of the leader clad in “budgie smugglers” are now firmly imprinted in the public’s mind.

This weekend he will compete in an ironman triathlon that includes a 3.8-kilometre swim and an 180km bike ride, and he is also preparing to take part in a 10-day “pollie pedal” bike ride from Melbourne to Sydney.

He has told ABC Local Radio that he will not be changing his plans.

“The pollie pedal has been going now for 13 years [and] I think it’s a great way for pollies to get out of their comfort zone,” he said.

“I don’t think it is something I should stop doing just because I’ve got a different job.

“We need more of these things if we are to build the social fabric.”

Mr Abbott is often seen jogging inside Parliament House early in the mornings.

And earlier this month he became part of an outback drama after being lost in the bush for several hours during a quad bike tour in the Northern Territory.

Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner has used Mr Abbott’s extensive exercise regime to paint him as a man whose mind is not on the job.

“There is one part of his body that does not get much exercise and that is the brain. And it is long overdue that it got a workout,” he told Parliament last week.

Abbott in no rush to reshuffle frontbench

Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott says he will not rush into reshuffling his frontbench and will only make minimal changes.

Less than four months into his leadership, Mr Abbott is facing an unexpected frontbench reshuffle after veteran Senator Nick Minchin resigned from the shadow ministry.

Senator Minchin will not contest the next election and will immediately step down from Mr Abbott’s frontbench after nearly 17 years in Parliament.

Some Liberals want Mr Abbott to take the opportunity to move outspoken Senator and finance spokesman Barnaby Joyce out of the Coalition’s economic team.

But Mr Abbott said Senator Joyce was doing an “outstanding job”.

The Government has long attacked Mr Abbott for appointing Senator Joyce to the position and Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner has urged Mr Abbott to end “his failed experiment with Senator Joyce”.

The Opposition’s immigration spokesman, Scott Morrison, has denied Senator Joyce may be moved from the prominent position.

“The Government is very quick to try and attack Barnaby, but if they actually got themselves out of Canberra and talked to people right across Australia they would understand that Barnaby enjoys incredibly strong support,” Mr Morrison told Sky News.

Senator Joyce says it is up to his leader to decide how he reshapes his team.

“That’s entirely Tony’s business,” he said.

Senator Joyce says he hopes the new leader works as closely with his party as Senator Minchin did.

“Whoever takes that role on, we hope that they take a leaf from Nick’s book and have the capacity to listen to the issues of the National Party and the National Party works very hard to be a cohesive part of the Coalition team,” he said.

Tasmanian Senator Eric Abetz is tipped to become the new Coalition Senate Leader but says that is not his decision to make, while Queensland Senator George Brandis is considered a likely Deputy Senate Leader.

Tributes flow

Mr Abbott led the tributes for Senator Minchin, saying the Coalition was facing a significant loss.

“I don’t think there would be anyone in the Senate who would be as widely respected on either side of politics,” he said.

“Nick has made an enormous contribution to the Liberal Party and Australian public life in a parliamentary career spanning two decades.

“As one of the most senior members of the Howard government, Nick served with distinction in a number of portfolios and was a significant strategic counsel to his cabinet colleagues over many years.”

West Australian Liberal Senator David Johnston said Senator Minchin had been a giant of the Senate.

“He will be very difficult to replace. He’s just a simply outstanding party man,” Senator Johnston said.

Senator Abetz and South Australian MP Christopher Pyne also paid tribute to Senator Minchin and thanked him for his contribution.

Senator Abetz said Senator Minchin was uncompromising on principle.

“Nick was a very unassuming person. He never sought the limelight,” he said.

“He did his job. He did it well. He did it effectively and anyone who did underestimate Nick Minchin did so at their own peril.”

Climate Change Minister Penny Wong says she hopes the move will enable Senator Minchin to spend more time with his family.

“I wish him well and I hope he gets to spend more quality time with his family and friends,” she said.

“I haven’t always agreed with Nick, but I have to say in my personal dealings with him I’ve always found him to be professional and courteous and I wish him all the best.”

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd also wished Senator Minchin well.

Reassessing priorities

Last month Senator Minchin’s son, Oliver, 19, was seriously injured in a boat accident while training with the Australian Defence Force Academy.

Senator Minchin said Oliver’s accident played a significant role in his decision to end his political career.

“When something like that happens and when one of your children, quite frankly, has a near-death experience it does make you reassess your life and your priorities,” he said. “I love politics. This is not an easy decision to make.”

Senator Minchin said he had been “wrestling” with his political future since the Coalition lost government in 2007 but wanted to see the party get through to more solid ground before leaving.

The Opposition Senate Leader has been in charge of the resources and energy portfolio since Mr Abbott’s reshuffle last December.

Senator Minchin was a key backer of Mr Abbott’s ascension to the leadership after a revolt against Malcolm Turnbull’s emissions trading policy late last year.

Mr Abbott has confirmed that Ian Macfarlane will act in Senator Minchin’s portfolio for now.

Senator Minchin denies his departure will damage Mr Abbott’s hopes in this year’s election.

“I will do as much as I possibly can to help Tony win that election,” he said.

Senate pre-selection will be decided on April 30 but Senator Minchin has declined to say who could replace him.

Liberal powerbroker Minchin to quit politics

Liberal stalwart Nick Minchin has resigned from the frontbench and will not contest the next election.

Senator Minchin fronted the media this afternoon to announce his decision after Coalition sources earlier indicated to the ABC he would be quitting politics.

Last month Senator Minchin’s son, Oliver, 19, was seriously injured in a boat accident while training with the Australian Defence Force Academy.

Senator Minchin said Oliver’s accident played a significant role in his decision to end his political career.

“When something like that happens and when one of your children, quite frankly, has a near-death experience it does make you reassess your life and your priorities,” he said.

“I love politics. This is not an easy decision to make.”

Senator Minchin said he had been “wrestling” with his political future since the Coalition 2007 loss but wanted to see the party get through to more solid ground before leaving.

“I spoke to [Opposition Leader Tony Abbott] earlier this morning. He of course would much prefer that I stayed and I’m grateful for his confidence,” he said.

The Opposition Senate Leader has been in charge of the resources and energy portfolio since Mr Abbott’s reshuffle last December.

Senator Minchin was a key backer of Mr Abbott’s ascension to the leadership after a revolt against Malcolm Turnbull’s emissions trading policy late last year.

His resignation from the frontbench will pave the way for a reshuffle and gives Mr Abbott the opportunity to move Barnaby Joyce from the finance portfolio after criticisms over the Senator’s performance.

In a statement Mr Abbott said Senator Minchin had earned great respect from his colleagues.

“Nick has made an enormous contribution to the Liberal Party and Australian public life in a parliamentary career spanning two decades,” he said.

“As one of the most senior members of the Howard government, Nick served with distinction in a number of portfolios and was a significant strategic counsel to his cabinet colleagues over many years.”

Mr Abbott also confirmed that Ian Macfarlane would act in the portfolio for now.

It is likely Tasmanian Senator Eric Abetz will be the Opposition’s new Senate Leader.

Senator Minchin denies his departure will damage Mr Abbott’s run up to this year’s election.

“I will do as much as I possibly can to help Tony win that election,” he said.

Senate pre-selection will be decided on April 30 but Senator Minchin has declined to say who could replace him.

Senator Abetz and fellow South Australian MP Christopher Pyne have also paid tribute to Senator Minchin and thanked him for his contribution.

Senator Abetz has told PM Senator Minchin was uncompromising on principle.

“Nick was a very unassuming person, he never sought the limelight,” he said.

“He did his job, he did it well. He did it effectively and anyone who did underestimate Nick Minchin did so at their own peril.”

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has also wished Senator Minchin well.

Influential player

Senator Minchin was first elected to the Senate in South Australia in 1993 and is known as a heavyweight in the right faction.

Under the Howard government, he worked several portfolios including industry, science and resources and finance. He is also considered an influential player behind the scenes.

As the parliamentary secretary to John Howard he was the chief architect of the formation of native title amendments after the High Court Wik decision.

As finance minister, he played a major role in economic decisions made by the Howard government.

But in its final term, Senator Minchin began to switch his allegiance from John Howard to Peter Costello.

Before taking on the resources and energy portfolio Senator Minchin was communications spokesman.

Senator Minchin was a driving force behind the toppling of former leader Mr Turnbull in a leadership spill against Mr Abbott last year.

After Mr Abbott resigned from the frontbench in protest at Mr Turnbull’s climate change stance, Senator Minchin and six others followed suit and backed Mr Abbott to take over as leader.

Senator Minchin campaigned against the policy, resigning from the shadow cabinet in protest against what he described as an “abomination”.

He had previously expressed doubt that climate change was caused by human activity.

Before entering Parliament he served as the deputy federal director of the Liberal Party and director of the South Australian Liberal Party.

Abbott challenges Rudd to asylum debate

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has challenged Prime Minister Kevin Rudd to a debate on asylum seekers next week.

Despite most observers concluding that Mr Rudd won yesterday’s health debate against Mr Abbott at the National Press Club in Canberra, the Opposition Leader says he is still keen for a series of debates, including one on border protection.

“I was very happy with the debate and I challenge Mr Rudd to have more of them,” he said.

“If Mr Rudd thinks that yesterday’s debate was such a great success for him, let’s have more.

“Let’s have one on border protection next week. [Then] we can have one about pink batts and the school hall rip-off.”

Mr Rudd has declined the invitation, saying Mr Abbott should be focused on health policy.

Mr Abbott’s challenge came as a United Nations report revealed Australia received 6,170 asylum applications in 2009 – 30 per cent more than in the previous year.

That is 1.6 per cent of the total around the world, where 50,000 applications were made to the United States and 42,000 to France.

Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison says the Government’s softened stance on border protection is behind the rise.

“Clearly we have an Australian problem here and it’s a product of Australian policy forces,” he said.

But Immigration Minister Chris Evans has rejected the Opposition’s claims.

Senator Evans says the conflict in Afghanistan is to blame for the increase in asylum seekers fleeing to Australia.

But he says Australia’s proportion of the world total is still very low.

“We’re getting less than 2 per cent of those fleeing to industrialised countries, but we are seeing increased arrivals from Afghanistan and Sri Lanka,” he said.

“While the situation in those countries remains difficult, we’ll continue to see people arrive.”

Australia is ranked 16th out of 44 industrialised nations in terms of how many asylum seeker applications are received.

‘Australian solution’

Meanwhile, the Greens say any debate on border protection should include them.

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young says the major parties both need to be challenged on the issue.

“To put forward a real solution, an Australian solution, that is fair, humane, practical and long-term, because that’s what we need,” she said.

The Greens are also stepping up pressure on the Government over the conditions on Christmas Island.

Senator Hanson-Young wants an urgent review by the Immigration ombudsman into the time it takes to process asylum seekers, as well as the facilities on the island.

“I’m calling on the Government to ask the ombudsman to do this,” she said.

“I think it would be a good thing for them to be able to have some independent assessment.

“But if, on the return of Parliament, we have had no movement, I will introduce a motion and amendment to the Commonwealth Ombudsman Act, to ensure that we can get things moving.”

Abbott rebuffs health briefing offer

Health Minister Nicola Roxon says Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has not yet bothered to attend a Government briefing on its new health policy.

But Mr Abbott’s health spokesman says the briefings are a farce and a “political stunt” aimed at making the Government look like it is taking a bipartisan approach.

During yesterday’s health debate Prime Minister Kevin Rudd urged Mr Abbott to cooperate on health policy, but Mr Abbott is rebuffing his calls because he says Mr Rudd insists on “lying” to discredit his record as health minister.

Ms Roxon has told AM a briefing was offered when the plan was released.

“So far he hasn’t taken up that offer,” she said.

“I think it’s strange that Mr Abbott seems to be so determined to throw mud that he’s not actually prepared to pick up the toolbox and be involved in this debate.”

But Opposition health spokesman Peter Dutton says the Government’s offer is not genuine.

“We’ve had briefings on legislation during the course of the last 12 months which have been a complete farce,” he told ABC 2.

“I’ve had a goon sitting in with the departmental officials from the minister’s office. The department officials refuse to answer the most basic of questions.

“I’m not going to be part of a political stunt process.”

Mr Abbott has told 2GB radio he will not work with Mr Rudd on the policy unless he stops making the claim that the Opposition Leader “ripped” $1 billion out of the health system in his time as health minister.

“One minute he is smiling at me and saying, ‘Come on, let’s work constructively together’, and the next minute he gets all snarly and accuses me of doing terrible things to the health system,” he said.

“I think it’s very hard to work with someone who is basically calling you a liar, and that’s what Mr Rudd does.”

Mr Rudd has been endorsed by most commentators as the winner of yesterday’s health debate.

Mr Abbott was forced to make negative attacks in the absence of a Coalition health policy, while Mr Rudd presented a more positive front.

Both “worms” on Channel 9 and Channel 7 also favoured Mr Rudd.

But Mr Abbott says he is not worried.

“The worm has never liked Liberals. It never liked John Howard. If the worm had its way Mark Latham would have been prime minister.”

Mr Rudd is today meeting with West Australian Premier Colin Barnett to discuss his health plan, which proposes a 60 per cent funding takeover of public hospitals.

WA, New South Wales and Victoria have raised concerns about the proposal, but if they do not agree to it at the April 19 COAG meeting the Government will take it to the voters with a referendum.

Hockey throws ‘anywhere, anytime’ challenge at Swan

The Opposition’s Joe Hockey says Treasurer Wayne Swan is refusing to debate him.

Yesterday Opposition Leader Tony Abbott and Prime Minister Minister Kevin Rudd faced off over health, and Mr Abbott says he wants three debates during the election campaign.

The shadow treasurer has told Channel Seven that Mr Swan has so far refused his challenges.

“I have challenged Wayne Swan to debates for the last 12 months and he won’t debate me,” Mr Hockey said.

“Wayne Swan, the Treasurer, will not debate the shadow treasurer at all. He sends out Lindsay Tanner or someone else.

“He refuses to debate me on the economy and I say again I’m happy to debate the Treasurer anywhere, anytime.”

Debate does little to cure health concerns

Australia’s peak health bodies have not declared a winner from Tuesday’s leaders debate, labelling the clash a predictable sparring session that was more about politics than policy.

Whether Prime Minister Kevin Rudd or Opposition Leader Tony Abbott won the debate at the National Press Club depends on who you ask.

The commercial television “worm” made a return and was generally up for Mr Rudd and not so much for Mr Abbott.

Treasurer Wayne Swan said Mr Rudd had a plan while Mr Abbott had a “grudge”.

The Opposition’s health spokesman, Peter Dutton, said he thought the public would “like what they see” from Mr Abbott.

“I don’t think anybody will ever stand in any doubt what Tony Abbott is thinking. He speaks his mind. He’s direct,” Mr Dutton said.

But the Australian Medical Association (AMA) says the debate was all about politics with a little bit of policy mixed in.

AMA president Dr Andrew Pesce says Mr Abbott’s commitment to fund 3,500 extra beds in the public hospital system is welcome.

“That’s something which we’ve been calling for for years, so that’s a good thing,” Dr Pesce said.

And he says he is glad Mr Rudd has changed his mind over country hospital funding.

Small hospitals could now be eligible to continue receiving block funding rather than being forced into the case-mix system, under which funding is dished out on a per-patient basis.

“I think it’s one-all in new policy,” Dr Pesce said. “They’re both important announcements, so we’re pleased to hear that from both people.

“I’m not saying one was the winner.”

The change for country hospitals has also been welcomed by the Rural Doctors Association of Australia (RDAA).

“We’ve been working very hard lobbying for that to happen since the announcement the Prime Minister made a couple of weeks ago,” said RDAA chief executive Steve Sant.

“The end result [of the case-mix system] would have been a number of rural hospitals would have closed. They would have been unviable.

“But there wasn’t a great deal of substance in [the debate] to be quite truthful. So to some extent it was a boring debate.”

Lack of detail

Martin Laverty from Catholic Health Australia said he was disappointed with the lack of policy detail from both sides.

“For those who wanted some entertainment over lunch, they got a bit of that,” he said.

“But for people waiting on public hospital queues for surgery, they’re not going to get it any sooner.

“The Prime Minister could have outlined the detail as to how hospital networks were going to work. He could have outlined how he was going to extend choice, access and sustainability to Australia’s aged care system.

“Similarly, the Opposition Leader could have detailed how his plan for hospitals would improve access to public services around the nation.”

Cydde Miller from the Australian Healthcare and Hospital Association said the debate would have been more worthwhile if Mr Abbott had released more policy.

“I think it really was quite predictable in that it was just a bit of a sparring session,” she said. “And that’s quite disappointing, I think, for voters.”

Ferocity and composure

Dr Mukesh Haikerwal, a former head of the AMA, said there was one fighter and one more placid player in the debate.

“I think it’s up to people how they like to see their politics played, with ferocity or with composure,” he said.

The commercial television “worm” made its return and found Mr Rudd to be the clear winner.

But the Liberal Party’s federal director, Brian Loughnane, read it differently.

“I think it was very good for Tony Abbott. Tony Abbott clearly established himself as an alternate prime minister,” Mr Loughnane said.

Former Liberal staffer and political commentator Grahame Morris points out there is a long way to go until polling day.

“They both did their jobs. The Prime Minister gets the bed pan award and Tony Abbott gets the thermometer award,” Mr Morris said.

“These sorts of things tweak polls a little bit, but come election day, today won’t matter one jot.”

Tweeps turn to worm as leaders battle

The worm is as popular as ever, and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott needs to work on his schtick, if Twitter is anything to go by.

As Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Mr Abbott went head-to-head on health at the National Press Club today, political tragics converged on Twitter to offer their commentary.

But political journos and punters alike were transfixed by Channel Nine’s “worm” and Channel Seven’s “pollie graph”, which gauge sentiment of a handpicked studio audience.

Early on, the Twitterati focussed on the worm’s apparent dislike for Mr Abbott’s “negativity”.

“Abbott starts out attacking Rudd and the worm dives into negative territory,” wrote AustraliaVotes.

The ABC’s Annabel Crabb pointed out a possible left-wing bias in the worms: “Where’d they hire these things? The Australian Union of Nematodes?”

2UE’s Latika Bourke also noted the worm’s attraction to Mr Rudd: “Okay, finished with the worm. It’s clearly in love with Rudd – looks like my Lib source was right.”

And Pollytics pointed out that the worms were less averse to Mr Rudd ‘going negative’: “Interesting that Rudd gets better responses when going negative than Abbott does. By a large margin.”

Both worms and Twitter commentators were nonplussed with Mr Abbott’s attempts at humour, such as likening the PM to an anaesthetist.

Pollytics: “Interesting that Abbott’s jokes elicit major negative movement. Something for the gallery to get their head around with #qt.”

And smurray38 added: “Dear Mr Abbott, a self-deprecating joke as an icebreaker at the outset may work; voters want gravitas in these debates.”

As the debate stretched on, boredom set in.

“2003-04 Budget Paper showdown … exhilarating!,” wrote MoreOj.

“Now everyone’s waving Budget papers. This is exactly like a dream I once had,” said AnnabelCrabb.

After the debate, Ms Bourke put the question to the PM himself: “Just asked Rudd if he thought he won: ‘that’s for others to determine, the important thing is health and hospitals reform’.”

And Sky News’s John Bergin noted the differences between polls run on Sky, the ABC, and News Ltd: “So far 69 per cent of Sky News poll respondents say Abbott won the debate, 31 per cent to Kevin Rudd”.

“Meanwhile, 62 per cent of The Drum poll respondents give it to Rudd, and 33 per cent give it to Rudd on The Punch.”

Sky’s David Speers said: “I thought Rudd narrowly won the debate. Even a senior Liberal source agrees.”

Later Misha Schubert, The Age’s political correspondent, said Mr Rudd’s gamble paid off: “Abbott kinda hamstrung without a health policy. Needs one urgently so he can go positive”.

“Still it will help Abbott prepare for the election debates – giving him a chance to learn how to appeal in that forum.”

The debate, the first televised debate between Mr Rudd and Mr Abbott, followed a bruising encounter in Question Time last Thursday.

The encounter ended with Mr Abbott challenging Mr Rudd to a series of three pre-election debates.

(Note: Tweets selected via The Drum twitterfeed, #npc and #npchealth)

The worm declares victory for Rudd

Don’t believe a politician who tells you the worm is a harmless distraction, or a TV toy they ignore.

In the words of Greg Turnbull, a former adviser to both Paul Keating and Kim Beazley: “The worm they regard as completely unscientific mumbo jumbo – except when it supports you.”

Viewers who tuned in to today’s lunchtime debate got a contest that on one side at least, pandered to the worm.

Did you notice Kevin Rudd’s opening gambit?

The peppering of the words “parent”, “doctors”, “nurses”, and the phrases “my mum”, “my dad”, “little one”, “country hospitals”?

He told a carefully crafted homespun story which sent the worm skywards.

Since it was first used in 1993 for Keating v Hewson, leaders have picked up a thing or two about debating in front of the worm.

Stay positive (viewers don’t like constant negativity), don’t get caught up in bureaucratic jargon (or you’ll die a slow death), and keep away from words like tax (refer to 2001 debate and John Howard’s use of GST).

On Radio National’s Breakfast program this morning Greg Turnbull and John Howard’s former chief of staff Arthur Sinodinos gave some fascinating insights into debate preparation.

Mr Turnbull recalled a “full on dress rehearsal” for Kim Beazley in 2001, where the role of interrogator was played by John Faulkner.

John Howard’s preparation was not dissimilar, according to Mr Sinodinos. The former prime minister would gather a room full of experts and advisers to work through basic lines and also words that might shift the worm the right way.

Given the experience of his mentor, it’s surprising then how Mr Abbott played this debate.

He used his opening statement to attack his opponent.

He repeated the phrases “broken promises”, “old promises” “can’t trust”, all the while the worm moving south.

The 100 so-called undecided voters who Channel 9 chose to control the worm didn’t like the negativity, meaning Mr Abbott ceded the “positive” moral high ground entirely to Kevin Rudd.

The rest of the debate played out in a similar fashion.

Mr Rudd held tight to his successful formula focusing on “country hospitals,” “rich or poor”, “mums and dads” and even “join with us in the positive.”

The worm loved it. Several times it went off the scale for Mr Rudd. Not once did it reach such heights for Mr Abbott.

Some Labor insiders thought Mr Rudd was “crazy brave” to take on this debate.

But the worm has spoken, the gamble paid off.

Rudd, Abbott lock horns on health

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has used today’s leaders health debate to urge Opposition Leader Tony Abbott to take a national bipartisan approach to fixing the health system.

But Mr Abbott said he would only cooperate if Mr Rudd stopped “telling lies” about his record as health minister, accusing Mr Rudd of wanting automatic agreement to his ideas.

Mr Rudd and Mr Abbott have locked horns over health reform at the National Press Club debate, with both accusing the other of failing to make any headway to improve the system.

The move by Mr Rudd to hold a debate outside the election campaign was highly unusual.

Mr Rudd had the advantage of being able to spruik a substantial part of his new policy but Mr Abbott made no bones about his intention to pick it apart.

While Mr Rudd and Mr Abbott appeared to perform consistently, both the Nine and Seven Network’s “worms” favoured Mr Rudd as winner, as have some commentators.

The two leaders opted for very different strategies in their opening gambits before a panel of 11 press gallery journalists.

Mr Rudd began by acknowledging there was so much more to be done and said it was time for both sides of politics to work together.

“It’s time that as leaders we stopped pointing fingers at one another and started pointing to the way ahead,” he said.

“I just find this rolling tidal wave of negativity a bit hard to understand when mums and dads want practical action now.”

But when Mr Abbott’s turn came he wasted no time in attacking Mr Rudd as a do-nothing leader who is heading a Government that breaks promises and is incompetent in program delivery.

“Mr Rudd asks for me to cooperate with him and then he tells blatant lies about my record,” he said.

“You are not prepared to consult. Your problem is you want to dictate to people, and your own premiers are in revolt over this.”

When Rudd called on Mr Abbott to “work together for the future”, Mr Abbott laughed loudly over the top of his words.

During much of the debate Mr Rudd sought to emphasise that the Government was taking “positive” action on health, while painting Mr Abbott as a negative leader who had no alternative.

And he also took another opportunity to remind voters that Mr Abbott “ripped” $1 billion out of the health system, a claim Mr Abbott hotly denies.

“The [claim] is un-prime ministerial and you should stop making [it],” Mr Abbott said.

Despite the almost 90-minute debate, voters got very little new detail from either side about their health policies.

But Mr Rudd did say that if the funding-per-patient model caused rural hospitals to miss out, the Government would consider block grants.

“Of course we would look at a form of national block funding which was able to underpin the continuation of smaller rural hospitals in the future,” he said.

Mr Abbott seized on Mr Rudd’s comments as evidence he was changing his policy.

Mr Abbott also said the Opposition was committed to funding 3,500 new hospital beds.

Both leaders also dodged questions on whether they would commit to a government-funded dental scheme.

The Nine Network’s “worm” appeared to favour Mr Rudd for a substantial portion of the debate, noticeably diving when Mr Abbott went in on the attack.

During much of the debate Mr Rudd looked down while Mr Abbott spoke and took notes. In contrast Mr Abbott did not hesitate in interrupting Mr Rudd when he objected to his answers.

Mr Rudd used his closing remarks to appeal to Mr Abbott to “get behind” his plan.

“Every day that is lost is a day longer that it will take to fix this problem,” he said.

Mr Abbott finished his comments by saying all Mr Rudd had was a “series of platitudes”.

Earlier today the Opposition was forced to change a graph which illustrated past Coalition health spending, to acknowledge some of the funds in the 2007/08 year came from Labor.

Mr Abbott has so far provided little detail of the Opposition’s health policy but wants local boards to run hospitals in New South Wales and Queensland.

The Government wants to take over 60 per cent of hospital funding from the states and will spend more than $600 million on 5,500 GP and specialist places, with more details of its full plan still to come.

Unsurprisingly, politicians backed their leaders as the winner of the day.

Treasurer Wayne Swan said Mr Rudd had a plan while Mr Abbott had a “grudge”.

Opposition health spokesman Peter Dutton said he thought the public would “like what they see”.

Australian Medical Association president Andrew Pesce said the debate contained more politics than policy, but he was pleased with Mr Abbott’s commitment to more hospital beds and possible changes to rural hospital funding.

Carol Bennett of the Consumer Health Forum says people want more details from both sides.

“If you’re judging this debate on its value in terms of health and what it will do for the people as opposed to its entertainment value, then you’d have to say that at at least the Government put forward a plan,” she said.

Deadline announced for health takeover approval

The Federal Government has just under a month to convince the states and territories to back its plan for Australia’s health and hospitals system.

The Government says states and territories have until a Council of Australian Governments meeting to be held on April 19 to sign on to the deal, which will see 30 per cent of GST revenue put towards public hospitals.

But the Government’s task has been complicated by the close election results in South Australia and Tasmania.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd faces the prospect of negotiating with another Liberal government if the Liberals can form a minority government in Tasmania, but Mr Rudd says this will not affect the timing of his health plans.

He says he will be working with both eventual winners in South Australia and Tasmania to get an agreement.

“Working families want better health and better hospital services and I will be working with any premier from any state, Labor or Liberal, to bring that about,” he said.

Treasurer Wayne Swan will meet with his state and territory counterparts this week to discuss the plan, which will also be the topic of Tuesday’s leaders debate in Canberra.

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has indicated that he is unlikely to unveil any major new policy announcements during that debate, which will be the first of three to be held this year according to Mr Rudd’s office.

The Government has challenged Mr Abbott to release his plans for Australia’s health and hospitals system, but Mr Abbott says that is not his job.

“My job is to ask the questions. My job is to scrutinise Mr Rudd’s proposals,” he said.

“The problem with his proposals is they’re not going to make any difference for patients any time soon.”

Meanwhile, Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner has told Channel Nine that the Mr Rudd will easily win this week’s debate.

“Tony Abbott will throw out one liners and cute little numbers and he’ll rant and rave and accuse Kevin Rudd of lying,” Mr Tanner said.

“But it’s long overdue that he was subject to serious analysis about his position on the future of the health system. If that happens, he won’t win the debate.”

Mr Tanner also labelled Tony Abbott over the top, erratic and aggressive.