Quebec premier to stay on, won’t make federal run

July 10 (Reuters) – The premier of Quebec said he planned to stay in office and battle separatists who want independence for the French-speaking Canadian province, adding that he would not try to become prime minister of Canada.

Premier Jean Charest, a Liberal struggling to fend off allegations of scandal, only has a slim majority in the provincial legislature and his party trails far behind the separatist Parti Quebecois in opinion polls. The Quebec Liberals are not aligned with the federal Liberals, the main opposition party in Ottawa.

Charest complained in April about how difficult it was to be a politician, raising speculation he might quit early. But he told Canadian Broadcasting Corp. radio that he had fought four Quebec elections and wanted to take part in a fifth.

“It’s been four consecutive elections. I think five is a good number,” he said in an interview broadcast on Saturday. Charest retained power in a December 2008 vote and in theory could remain premier for five years before the next ballot.

PQ governments have twice held referendums on breaking away from Canada, in 1980 and 1995. Both failed.

Although PQ leader Pauline Marois has so far declined to outline her plans if she were to take power, party members would expect another referendum in her first term. Any serious hint that Canada might break up would likely hit both investor sentiment and the Canadian dollar.

Charest, 52, was once a star in the federal Progressive Conservatives, one of two movements that merged in 2003 to create the Conservatives, the party that currently governs in Ottawa through a minority government. He is sometimes mentioned as a candidate to eventually replace Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who took power in early 2006.

When asked whether he planned to run for prime minister, Charest replied: “No. I’ve been at this for 25 years and I’m very happy where I am. I have a great job that I enjoy.”

Whether he can stay in his post depends in part on a probe into allegations by a former Liberal justice minister who said some donors had influenced the naming of Quebec judges.

Charest set up the inquiry in April but dismissed demands by Marois for a separate probe into possible corruption in the powerful construction industry, which is a big contributor to Liberal coffers.

Charest told the CBC that Marois was “applying a scorched earth policy” in a bid to hurt the Liberals. (Reporting by David Ljunggren; Editing by Frank McGurty)

SCENARIOS – Possible forms of government after UK election

Britain’s Conservative party has offered to work in government with the third-largest party, the Liberal Democrats, after the Conservatives won most seats in a parliamentary election but failed to secure a majority.

Below is a look at various scenarios:

CONSERVATIVE MINORITY GOVERNMENT – CONFIDENCE AND SUPPLY

* Probability: possible

In a minority government run on a “confidence and supply” basis, a party strikes deals with others on a bill-by-bill basis.

This is potentially risky since it means the government can effectively be held to ransom over every piece of legislation it wants to pass and has to enter long and complex negotiations to get bills through.

Any party faced with this prospect is likely to seek a swift second election in an attempt to get a stronger mandate.

Conservative leader David Cameron said on Friday this was one option but added: “I am prepared to consider alternative options. It may be possible to have stronger, more stable, more collaborative government than that.” These are discussed below.

* Likely market reaction: some analysts argue a centre-right Conservative minority government would still be enough to produce a small sterling rally in its own right. But financial markets could remain under pressure if investors think the government will struggle to push through much-needed reform to tackle the country’s budget deficit.

CONSERVATIVE MINORITY GOVERNMENT WITH LIB DEM PACT

* Probability: possible

Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg encouraged the Conservatives to try to form a government on Friday.

He did not specify the price for support from the left-leaning Lib Dems but stressed the need for electoral reform. This could prove a stumbling block as the Conservatives are strongly opposed to changes to the voting system.

Cameron proposed on Friday establishing an all-party committee to look into electoral reform but Clegg is likely to press at least for a referendum, as Labour have promised.

The two differ on the timing of deficit reduction although both agree on the need for drastic action to cut the deficit, currently standing at 11 percent of GDP.

Stances on Europe, immigration and defence are also likely to be stumbling blocks.

* Likely market reaction: the most important issue will be how quickly such a deal is worked out. If it becomes clear the Lib Dems will not block a budget, markets will be reassured. If horsetrading continues for a prolonged period of time, markets will sell off.

CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL DEMOCRAT COALITION

* Probability: less likely

The centre-left Lib Dems and centre-right Conservatives may find it difficult and impractical to work together in a formal coalition in which they share cabinet posts. Britain has no history of coalition in the post World War Two period.

* Likely market reaction: If the parties could inspire confidence the coalition was stable, markets are likely to rally but there would be deep scepticism about how long such an awkward partnership might last.

CONSERVATIVE MINORITY GOVERNMENT WITH SMALLER PARTY PACT

* Probability: less likely

Prior to the election, the Conservatives agreed an alliance with Northern Ireland’s Ulster Unionist Party, the more moderate of the two unionist parties who support UK rule in the province. But, the UUP did not win any seats in the election.

Support from the bigger Democratic Unionist Party, which won 8 seats, would still not give a Conservative government a parliamentary majority, so he would also need to bring in other parties such as Wales’s Plaid Cymru and the Scottish National Party.

* Likely market reaction: depends on how fast such a deal can be reached and how stable the informal coalition of such a wide grouping would be, but it is unlikely to give the markets much cause for a rally.

LABOUR MINORITY GOVERNMENT – CONFIDENCE AND SUPPLY

* Probability: unlikely

Labour won 258 seats in the election, well short of the 326 seats needed for a majority. To get legislation through on a piece-by-piece basis would require deals with not just the third-placed Liberal Democrats, who won 57 seats, but also other smaller parties such as Plaid Cymru and the SNP.

However, Labour might be able to secure a more formal pact on a programme of legislative reform as it did with the short-lived Lib-Lab pact in the late 1970s.

* Likely market reaction: negative. Such a government would be highly unstable. Investors may fear a minority Labour government would be slow to tackle public spending. But prompt action — or even simply promises of action — might reassure them. A second election within a few months would be likely.

LABOUR MINORITY GOVERNMENT WITH LIB DEM PACT

* Probability: possible

A more formal agreement on a programme of legislative reform would be considered more stable and is likely to include a promise of a referendum on electoral reform, as Labour has pledged in its manifesto.

* Likely market reaction: negative if it fears the deal lacks popular support but could rally if swift action and a programme to tackle the deficit was unveiled.

LABOUR AND LIBERAL DEMOCRAT COALITION

* Probability: unlikely

Nick Clegg has already expressed concern about working with Labour leader and current Prime Minister Gordon Brown. The parties would also be a minority coalition government, which would be seen as lacking legitimacy.

* Likely market reaction: negative. Such a coalition would be seen as weak and lacking a proper popular mandate.

(Reporting by Jodie Ginsberg; Editing by Matthew Jones)

UK’s Lib Dems consider Conservative government offer

Britain’s Liberal Democrat leader will seek backing from senior party members on Saturday for a possible deal with the Conservatives after Thursday’s election, in which none of the three major parties won a majority.

The centre-right Conservative Party won most parliamentary seats but they need the support of other parties to form a stable government that can tackle the record budget deficit.

A deal with the much smaller centrist Liberal Democrats would achieve that and also give the Lib Dems their first role in government for decades.

Leader Nick Clegg must overcome scepticism among a significant number of his party, who fear that Britain’s third largest party would be forced to sacrifice too many cherished policies for a deal.

Financial markets, already rattled by a debt crisis in Greece, want a new government to be formed quickly so it can set about reducing the deficit swiftly and decisively.

The pound, gilts and stock market all fell on Friday when it became clear the Conservatives would not have a parliamentary majority, despite beating the incumbent Labour Party soundly.

Conservative leader David Cameron appealed to the Liberal Democrats on Friday, saying he would consider some kind of formal agreement with them.

This could include a coalition, a rarity in Britain, but is more likely to involve a pact whereby the Lib Dems agree to support a Conservative-led minority government implementing an agreed legislative programme in return for concessions.

Senior members of both parties met on Friday night and further talks are expected over the next few days.

DEFICIT DISCUSSIONS

The most important hurdle is agreement on the pace of lowering the budget deficit. The Conservatives have pledged to start cutting it immediately but the Lib Dems warn this could harm Britain’s recovery from a deep recession in 2008-2009.

Electoral reform, along with immigration, Britain’s role in the European Union and defence, are also likely to be stumbling blocks. The Lib Dems have long pushed for a change to the first-past-the-post voting system in favour of proportional representation.

Clegg has to persuade Lib Dem members of parliament it is worth making concessions, even though many party members are sceptical.

“I will never consider voting for the Lib Dems again if a Conservative/Lim Dem pact is the outcome of this election!” one supporter said on Liberal Democrat Voice, a web site for party activists.

Former Labour Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott said on Saturday the Conservatives, or Tories as they are also known, would not be able to offer proportional representation.

“We have introduced it in the Scotland and Wales regional governments so it seems to be on the horizon. But the Tories won’t do it. We may,” Prescott told Reuters on the sidelines of an environment conference in Beijing. “The best possibility for proportional representation is with the Labour Party.”

If the Lib Dem/Conservative talks fail, a deal between Clegg’s party and Labour was possible, but more complicated as the two parties combined would not have enough MPs to form a majority in the 650-seat House of Commons.

A Lib Dem-Labour deal would therefore have to involve other parties such as nationalist groups like Wales’s Plaid Cymru and the Scottish Nationalist Party.

Labour leader Gordon Brown has said the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats had the right to try to form a government first even though he is allowed as sitting Prime Minister to have the first try under Britain’s constitution.

His party has pledged to hold a referendum on electoral reform.

(Editing by Matthew Jones)

- To see the latest stories about the UK, click http://link.reuters.com/quq44j for multimedia coverage

- See us online http://uk.reuters.com/news/globalcoverage/politics

UK will go to polls again within a year: Experts

London, May 8 (ANI): Britain is likely to go to the polls within 12 months, political experts have predicted.

According to The Telegraph, the cost of another ballot will run into tens of millions of pounds. The cost of a general election for the parties, however, is estimated to run to about 40 million pounds in total and most would want to avoid going to the polls if possible.

It quoted Dr Richard Toye, a historian at Exeter University, as saying: “I”d bet on an election in October or November this year.”

According to bookies Betfair, the chances of a second election by the end of 2010 have gone up from 28 per cent to 38 per cent during the course of Friday, as political betters started to lay money on a Conservative-led alliance falling apart and David Cameron going to voters again to win an outright majority.

The last time Britain elected a hung parliament, in February 1974, it resulted in a second election in October of that year, eight months later.

Dr David Butler of Nuffield College, Oxford, one of the country”s leading election experts, said there was likely be another election very soon, “because I don’t see the compromises that are necessary for a coalition.”

Historically, no minority government has lasted much more than two years.

The hung parliament of 1974 lasted for eight months, while the hung parliament of 1923 lasted for less than a year. (ANI)

Nick Clegg may play kingmaker in a hung British parliament

London, May 7 (IANS) Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg may hold the key to power as the election results, as per early exit polls, point to a hung parliament. Clegg faces a painful dilemma – to tango with Labour leader Gordon Brown or shake hands with Conservative leader David Cameron.

In case the Conservatives fail to get an overall majority in the House of Commons, Clegg would be the man who would take a call on who enters No. 10 Downing Street.

The Telegraph reported that Clegg could join a formal coalition with either Brown or Cameron in return for government jobs for him and his senior colleagues. Or he could agree to a ‘non-aggression pact’ in which he supported a minority government run by the largest party.

Clegg has attempted to keep his options open during campaigning by insisting that his commitments were only towards his manifesto pledges of fairer taxes, better education and economic and political reform.

Exit polls released after polling stations closed Thursday evening predicted a hung parliament in which neither of Britain’s two main parties would gain an overall majority.

The exit polls gave the David Cameron-led Conservatives 307 seats, 19 short of an outright majority. The Labour Party would win 255 seats, compared with 356 in 2005, and the Liberals were given 59 seats, remaining behind expectations.

Klegg has repeatedly said that whichever party won ‘the most votes and seats’ had the right to govern, and in turn he would extend support to it.

Britain heads for hung Parliament

London, May 7 (DPA) Britain is set for a change of government as the opposition Conservatives emerged as the biggest party from Thursday’s general election, and the ruling Labour Party suffered major losses, according to exit polls.

Figures announced as polling stations closed late Thursday predicted a hung Parliament, in which neither of Britain’s two main parties would gain an overall majority.

Exit polls gave the Conservatives under David Cameron 307 seats, just nine short of an outright majority.

The Labour Party of Prime Minister Gordon Brown was projected at 255 seats, compared with 356 in the last general election in 2005.

The result, if confirmed, could leave Cameron seeking to lead a minority government or asking the Liberal Democrats for support.

As results are being counted through the night, if Labour does better than the exit polls suggest, a link-up between Labour and the Liberal Democrats could be possible.

The Liberal Democrats, despite a highly successful campaign, would gain 59 seats, according to the exit polls, remaining behind expectations before the vote.

The full results will be known early Friday.

Britain heads for hung Parliament in cliffhanger election

London, May 7 (DPA) Britain could be set for a change of government following a general election Thursday in which the Conservatives emerged as the biggest party, according to exit polls.

Figures announced as polling stations closed late Thursday predicted a hung Parliament, in which neither of Britain’s two main parties would gain an overall majority.

However, the ruling Labour Party of Prime Minister Gordon Brown immediately made clear that it hoped to hold on to power by wooing the smaller Liberal Democratic Party for an alliance to keep the Conservatives out of power.

The exit polls, based on surveys of 18,000 voters as they emerged from polling stations, showed a disappointing outcome for the Liberal Democrats, whose leader Nick Clegg had been declared the undisputed star of the four-week election campaign.

Exit polls have not proved entirely accurate in the past, commentators pointed out Thursday. Full results will be known Friday.

The exit polls gave the Conservatives, led by David Cameron 307 seats, 19 short of an outright majority. The Labour Party would win 255 seats, compared with 356 in 2005, and the Liberals were given 59 seats, remaining behind expectations.

The result, if confirmed, could leave Cameron seeking to lead a minority government or asking the Liberal Democrats and other smaller parties for support.

As results are being counted through the night, and if Labour does better than the exit polls suggest, a coalition between Labour and the Liberal Democrats could be possible.

Under the unwritten rules of Britain’s constitution, the sitting prime minister has the first option to ask Queen Elizabeth II to form a government.

However, convention also states that the party with the most seats has the ‘moral’ right to ask to form a government.

Leading Labour figures immediately made clear that the party was in no mood to concede defeat.

Business Secretary Peter Mandelson, the party’s chief strategist, wooed the Liberals for an alliance to ‘keep the Conservatives out.’

Mandelson said that electoral reform in Britain, from the current first-past-the-post system to proportional representation, was ‘overdue.’

A change in the voting system, which has in the past benefited the two main parties, has been at the heart of the campaign.

Brown had made securing the fragile economic recovery the main plank of his bid for a fourth consecutive Labour term. But critics are accusing him of being responsible for Britain’s massive budget deficit of 163 billion pounds ($242 billion).

In a stark reminder of the problems facing a new government, British papers printed a warning from the European Commission that Britain’s deficit, expected to reach 12 percent of gross domestic product in 2011, could come to exceed that of Greece.

Markets have shown signs of nervousness ahead of the elections, amid predictions of an inconclusive outcome that could lead to weeks of horse-trading over the formation of a new government.

A string of opinion polls for national newspapers were unanimous Thursday in placing the opposition Conservatives, led by David Cameron, in the lead by a comfortable margin.

However, under the vagaries of Britain’s first-past-the-post electoral system, opinion poll popularity ratings say little about the actual number of seats won in the 649 constituencies across the country.

Polling day was overshadowed by the crash of a light aircraft carrying Nigel Farage, a candidate for the anti-European United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP).

The 46-year-old former leader of UKIP, who is also a member of the European Parliament, escaped the crash of the two-seater aircraft with minor head injuries, a party spokesman said.

The accident was believed to have been caused by an election banner the plane was towing, urging a UKIP vote, becoming entangled with the aircraft.

Labour looking for coalition as exit polls predict a hung parliament

London, May 7 (ANI): Britain might be heading for its first hung parliament in 36 years if exit poll predictions are to be gone by.

As the election counting begins in a closely contested general election, the Conservatives are struggling to obtain necessary battleground gains to claim power outright, despite some considerable swings.

Nevertheless, the Tories seemed optimistic about the election outcome believing that winds of change are sweeping through Britain with the Labour Party heading for a possible defeat for the first time in thirteen years.

The Sky News/BBC/ITN poll expects the Conservatives to win 305 seats, with Labour on 255 and the Lib Dems on 61.

According to Sky News, the result would see David Cameron”s party fall short of the 326 MPs needed for an overall majority by 21 seats.

Earlier, a Tory spokesman said the projected result was a “decisive rejection of Labour” and enough for the Conservatives to form a minority government.

After sweeping to victory in his Witney constituency, Mr Cameron said, “We have to wait for the full results, but it is clear the Labour government has lost its mandate to govern this country.”

But if the exit poll prediction is realised, it would present Labour with enough seats to align with Nick Clegg”s party to form an administration.

Foreign Secretary David Miliband told Sky News dismissed Tory claims to office and indicated that a Lib-Lab pact was likely.

“If no party has a majority in the House of Commons, no party has a moral right to a monopoly of power,” he said.

Business Secretary Peter Mandelson said early results were proof “people are not flying into the arms of the Tories”.

Meanwhile, the projected figure of 61 seats is a huge setback for the Lib Dems after such a buoyant election campaign.

Lib Dem Economics spokesperson Vince Cable deemed the exit poll a “strange result” amid disbelief from party activists.

Sky News business reports that the fluctuations of voting patterns have had a significant effect on the British markets with the pound registering a slight depreciation, in the minutes after the exit poll was published the pound slipped by around one cent against the dollar. (ANI)

Liberals open Parliament with no-confidence bid

The Tasmanian Opposition has moved a no-confidence motion against the new minority Labor Government in the first sitting of Parliament.

Labor lost its majority at the March 20 election, winning only 10 seats in the 25-member House of Assembly.

The Liberals expected to govern in minority because the party won the same number of seats as Labor but gained more votes.

During the campaign Premier David Bartlett said the party with the most votes should get the first opportunity to govern, but he was later asked by the Governor to test his government’s support on the floor of the House.

Opposition Leader Will Hodgman has accused Mr Bartlett of talking his way back into office by refusing to guarantee confidence in a Liberal minority government.

Mr Hodgman vented his anger on the first day of Parliament.

“I move that the House has no-confidence in the Premier or the Government he leads,” Mr Hodgman said.

The motion will be debated throughout the afternoon session but is doomed to fail because the Greens have backed Labor.

Earlier the Greens and Liberals teamed up to elect the Greens’ Tim Morris as Chairman of Committees and therefore Deputy Speaker, ahead of Labor’s Brenton Best.

Tories rule out post poll alliance with Lib Dems

London, May 3 (ANI): Britain’s Conservative Party leader David Cameron has said that he has no intention of working on a post-poll tie-up with the Nick Clegg-led Lib Dem alliance.

According to The Telegraph, Cameron believes the momentum is with his party after his confident performance in last week’s final leaders’ debate, Gordon Brown’s “bigoted woman” gaffe and a series of polls showing a fall in Lib Dem support.

The paper claims that Cameron is preparing to “go it alone” and form a minority government.

Cameron has said that he will launch one final push for support over the next 72 hours, including an all-night stint of campaigning targeting night-shift workers and late-night radio listeners.

He will reach out to voters in Northern Ireland amid signs that the unionist parties may hold the key to the Tories forming a government.

Cameron is also relying on the reluctance of the Lib Dems or Labour to risk unpopularity with the electorate by bringing down a minority Tory government at a time of economic uncertainty. (ANI)

Labor pains deliver first Green minister

The leader of the Tasmanian Greens appears set to go down in history as the first MP from the party to be given a ministerial job.

In a highly-anticipated move, Nick McKim has been formally invited to join the Cabinet in Labor’s minority government.

The Greens leader has until Sunday morning to accept the power-sharing offer.

After three days of negotiations, Premier David Bartlett on Friday invited Mr McKim to be a minister in the Cabinet but will not speculate on which portfolio he would hold.

Mr Bartlett has ruled out appointing more Greens ministers for now but says Upper House independents may be invited before the Cabinet is sworn in next Wednesday.

“Tonight I have sent Mr Nick McKim a letter of invitation to join a Labor Cabinet as a non-PLP [Parliamentary Labor Party] member,” he said.

“This has never happened before in Tasmania and therefore we need to tread carefully.”

The offer compels Mr McKim to vote with the Government in Parliament on matters approved by Cabinet.

The only exceptions are so-called “matters of significant concern” in which he can abstain, as long as he consults the Premier.

In a brief statement, Mr McKim says he is taking legal advice about the formal offer and will respond after consulting the Greens’ partyroom.

The announcement comes almost four weeks after the state election which resulted in a hung parliament, with Labor and the Liberal Party holding 10 seats each in the Lower House and the Greens five seats.

Mr Bartlett says he is convinced the appointment will make his minority government more stable and effective.

“I recognise there will be many people who don’t want to see this happen in Tasmania,” he said.

‘Long and complex’ Labor caucus meeting underway

The Tasmanian Labor Party’s new caucus is discussing whether to include Greens members in its new Cabinet.

The Government has 10 members in the House of Assembly, including four new faces, as well as three members in the Upper House.

They have been meeting since 11am (AEST) to consider new portfolios and whether to include Greens members as Ministers in the new hung Parliament.

There is speculation the Greens could get up to two ministries, including the Premier’s Education portfolio.

On his way into the meeting, Labor backbencher Brenton Best was cautious about whether minority government can work.

“It’s an interesting proposition,” he said.

“(It) hasn’t done in the past, but maybe it’ll happen this time.”

On the way in the Housing Minister, Lyn Thorpe, said it would a long and complex meeting.

The Greens were meeting at New Norfolk earlier today but leader Nick McKim was giving little away.

“Obviously Labor are having a party-room meeting also, today,” he said.

“I don’t know what the outcomes of that meeting will be.

“We’re concentrating on our meeting, it’s going very well and we’re treating the current situation very seriously.”

Treasurer’s commitment

The Liberals are maintaining pressure on the Treasurer, Michael Aird, to remember his pledge not to work with Green MPs.

Mr Aird was unequivocal last August about the prospect of Green ministers in a Labor Government.

“I’m not going to be in a Government that has Nick McKim or Kim Booth or any Greens in it,” he said.

Yesterday Mr Aird released a one line statement saying that “I am not prepared to speculate on hypotheticals.”

Shadow Treasurer Peter Gutwein says if Greens are appointed as ministers then Mr Aird would have no option but to resign.

The Premier David Bartlett would not be drawn on the make up of the new parliament yesterday on Sky News, but he did promise to work co-operatively with the other parties.

“It is my duty, my responsibility, now to make it work on behalf of all Tasmanians and the only way we can do that, I believe, is to build trust, we must build trust in the Parliament, across the Parliamentary and political divides,” he said.

The new Cabinet will be sworn in by Wednesday.

Factbox: Hungary Socialist PM candidate Mesterhazy

(Reuters) – Hungarian economist Attila Mesterhazy is the prime minister candidate of the ruling Socialist party in Sunday’s election. Latest opinion polls show the Socialists may come second, ahead of the far-right Jobbik but well behind center-right Fidesz.

World

Prime Minister Gordon Bajnai who has headed the Socialist minority government since April 2009 did not stand in the election.

Here are five facts about Mesterhazy:

* Mesterhazy, 36, is deputy chairman of the Socialist party and leader of its parliamentary group. He entered politics in 1999 as one of the founders of a new left-wing movement.

* As prime minister candidate, Mesterhazy campaigned on a pledge to rebuild the Hungarian left.

* Mesterhazy wants to modernize Hungary to enable it to react swiftly to the challenges posed by globalization. At the same time he insists on core Socialist values, such as universal access to health care and education.

* He graduated with honors from the Budapest University of Economics in 1997 and earned his doctorate two years later. He is fluent in English and Spanish. * Mesterhazy was born in the southern town of Pecs, he is married with two children.

(Compiled by Gergely Szakacs)

Factbox: Hungary Socialist PM candidate Mesterhazy

(Reuters) – Hungarian economist Attila Mesterhazy is the prime minister candidate of the ruling Socialist party in Sunday’s election. Latest opinion polls show the Socialists may come second, ahead of the far-right Jobbik but well behind center-right Fidesz.

World

Prime Minister Gordon Bajnai who has headed the Socialist minority government since April 2009 did not stand in the election.

Here are five facts about Mesterhazy:

* Mesterhazy, 36, is deputy chairman of the Socialist party and leader of its parliamentary group. He entered politics in 1999 as one of the founders of a new left-wing movement.

* As prime minister candidate, Mesterhazy campaigned on a pledge to rebuild the Hungarian left.

* Mesterhazy wants to modernize Hungary to enable it to react swiftly to the challenges posed by globalization. At the same time he insists on core Socialist values, such as universal access to health care and education.

* He graduated with honors from the Budapest University of Economics in 1997 and earned his doctorate two years later. He is fluent in English and Spanish. * Mesterhazy was born in the southern town of Pecs, he is married with two children.

(Compiled by Gergely Szakacs)

Let the lobbying begin

Handing down a $4 billion budget will be one of the first and most difficult tasks for the Bartlett minority government.

With the state’s economy in deficit, it’ll no doubt be looking at ways to save money.

Tasmania’s Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s CEO Robert Wallace says minority government is bad news for big business.

“At the moment we’re in a budget deficit and the last thing we need is for that to continue. That would undermine all the resilience the state’s built up over the last 10 or 15 years,” he said.

“With this government, what we’d be hoping to do is to act as an advocate and to work with the new government to assist them in identifying areas there may be savings that will allow us to return to a sustainable budget over the next three to five years.”

The chamber once again has the public sector in its sights.

Robert Wallace says new technology should be used to reduce the need to employ more public servants.

“It could be in communication efficiencies, through telecomuting (sic) for meetings and those sorts of things.”

“It would mean the number of people employed in the public sector could plateau off.”

The TCCI’s position has riled the Public Sector Union’s Mat Johnston who says a strong public sector is crucial to buffering the instability a minority government can create.

“They’re going to rely heavily on the public service to provide them with advice,” he said.

“The Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce seems to be going back to their common reprise of cutting jobs in the public sector to fund their pet projects,” he said.

The union is about to launch an advertising campaign reminding all three political parties of their promise of job security.

Political analyst Dr Richard Eccelston says both groups will need to tone down their budget wish-lists under a minority government.

“What it requires is a degree of compromise, not only from political parties but from all stakeholders, from business, from unions and everyone that’s got an interest in a sound economic strategy,” he said.

Dr Eccelston is suggesting the government expand the current system of Lower House committees to include non-MP members from interest groups.

“It would help in working out where the Tasmanian community stands on these issues such as the economy before they go to parliament,” he said.

Libs say Labor doctored advice to Governor

Tasmanian Opposition Leader Will Hodgman has continued his attack on legal advice given to the Governor by caretaker Premier David Bartlett.

Mr Hodgman says it appears Labor omitted a paragraph from an interview transcript in the advice given to Governor Peter Underwood.

He says the paragraph quoted Mr Bartlett saying he would never move a motion of no confidence in a government, except in the most serious circumstances.

Mr Hodgman says omitting that part of the transcript generated doubt about the viability of a Liberal minority administration.

“When I received a copy of what Mr Bartlett had apparently sent to his Excellency, and that included a transcript of an interview that was not complete and just happened to exclude that one paragraph where Mr Bartlett said they would not move no confidence in a minority government that, in my view, has me quite legitimately asking Mr Bartlett to explain that,” he said.

“In the most extraordinary of circumstances where the Governor of Tasmania is contemplating commissioning a new government and Mr Bartlett can not even be trusted to provide His Excellency with all the information, I find [it] extraordinary.”

The ABC is seeking a response from Labor.

Governor’s reasons

The Governor has released his reasons for inviting Mr Bartlett to form the state’s next government.

Mr Underwood says he was constitutionally obliged to invite Mr Bartlett to form government because he was not satisfied there would be stability under Liberal leader Will Hodgman.

The Governor says Mr Bartlett’s pre-election promise to give up power if the Liberals polled more of the statewide vote was consitutionally irrelevant.

Meanwhile, Mr Hodgman has again ruled out a deal with the Greens to secure minority government.

Mr Hodgman says he is now focusing on a role as the state’s Opposition Leader.

Greens Leader Nick McKim says his door will remain open to the Liberals and Labor if they want to strike a formal deal.

“The way that Will can deliver that real change, if he’s fair dinkum about it, is simply to pick up the phone or drop me a text or an email,” he said.

“We could sit down maturely and constructively and work through a process which may end up in a formal arrangement between the Greens and the Liberals.”

But Mr Hodgman has again ruled that out.

“I’ve always said no deals. I can’t stop Mr McKim or Mr Bartlett manoeuvring themselves into a position where they can form some sort of coalition government and nor do I intend to do that,” he said.

“It’s a decision they’ve made and they have said they are going to make it work. Well, my job is to hold them to account.”

New Govt on notice over spending

Business groups and unions have already started lobbying on how to cushion the impact of minority government.

Big business believes minority government is bad news for industry.

Tasmania’s Chamber of Commerce and Industry is urging the new government to reduce public spending.

Chief executive Robert Wallace says the public service is an obvious target.

“At the moment we’re in a budget deficit and the last thing we want is for that to continue,” he said.

“That would undermine all the resilience this state’s built up over the last 10 or 15 years.”

But the union movement is nervous about any push for jobs cuts.

Mat Johnston from the public sector union says the political parties will be reminded about their promises of job security in a new advertising campaign.

“Those promises need to be honoured,” he said.

Mr Johnston says the new government should take its time and consult widely before making any changes to the public sector.

He says public servants want a bigger say in any changes.

“[They should] take their time and make some correct decisions and consult with stakeholders before taking any knee-jerk reactions to unwind or put in place new reforms.”

Political analyst Richard Eccleston suggests the new State Government include unionists and industry leaders in Lower House committees.

“So that we can try to work out compromise where the Tasmanian community stands on these issues before they get to Parliament,” he said.

Labor’s door open on Greens deal

Tasmania’s returned Premier has left the way open for a power-sharing deal with the Greens.

The Governor, Peter Underwood, ended a dramatic chapter in Tasmanian politics yesterday when he told the caretaker Premier, David Bartlett, he had an obligation to test the strength of his government on the floor of the house.

The Greens announced yesterday they would not initiate or support no-confidence motions against a minority Labor Government in a new Parliament, unless a new deal was negotiated by Labor or the Liberals.

The Governor then asked Mr Bartlett to test support on the floor of the next Parliament, dashing the Liberal’s expectations of minority Government.

The Premier-in-waiting says his mission is to restore trust in Tasmania’s political system.

“I intend to make the government work in the interests of all Tasmanians for the next four years,” he said.

Mr Bartlett has not ruled out a ministerial post for the Greens in a new cabinet but he said this morning he would be taking a “step-by-step” approach to achieve a stable parliament.

He believes Greens leader Nick McKim is also committed to making the new parliament work.

Mr McKim says part of the reason he decided to back Labor was because Greens voters favoured Labor in preferences.

He told ABC2′s News Breakfast his party backed Labor in the interests of stability and the fact they were the incumbent Government, but also because of Greens voters.

“There are various democratic ways you can assess the electoral intent of Tasmanian voters including if you want to have a look at preference flows from Greens voters,” he said.

“Significantly more, although less than normal, but significantly more Greens voters still preferenced Labor over Liberal in the last election.”

Mr McKim has welcomed an apparent new direction from Mr Bartlett.

Mr Bartlett has said his new Labor government needed to move away from the old way of doing things.

Mr McKim says that is what people voted for.

“I was encouraged to hear him say that we need to move away from some of the old paradigms because I think that’s an accurate reflection of the way the Tasmanian voted,” he said.

“The Tasmanian people chose, quite deliberatley, to elect a parliament with no one party in absolute power and I have absolute confidence that this parliament can work.”

No confidence move

Liberal Leader Will Hodgman has already flagged a no-confidence motion against Labor but the Greens will not support it.

He has accused the Greens of being dishonourable by pledging their support for a minority Labor Goverment.

“In their lust for power they’ve sold out to the Labor Party. [They were] soundly beaten at the election and have offered unconditional support,” he said.

“So when I said a vote for the Greens is a vote for Labor I was right.”

Mr McKim has urged Mr Hodgman to cooperate.

“He needs to put that disappointment behind him and not be a destabiliser or wrecker in the new parliament,” he said.

Labor and the Liberals hold 10 seats each in the new parliament and the Greens five.

Hodgman threatens no-confidence vote

Tasmania’s new Labor minority Government is already facing the threat of a no-confidence motion.

Governor Peter Underwood ended a dramatic chapter in Tasmanian politics yesterday, when he told caretaker Premier David Bartlett he had an obligation to test the strength of his government on the floor of the house.

Mr Bartlett had advised the Governor to invite the Liberals to form minority government.

The major parties hold 10 seats each in the hung parliament and the Greens hold five.

Liberal leader Will Hodgman says he will move a motion of no-confidence immediately.

He had expected to become Premier because his party won more votes.

“On day one, Tasmanians know that they have a government that has been built on deceit and lies,” he said.

“In their lust for power, [the Greens have] sold out to the Labor party, soundly beaten at the election and have offered unconditional support – so when I said a vote for the Greens is a vote for Labor, I was right.”

“[Mr Bartlett is] forming an illegitimate government with the support of the Greens – Tasmanians now have a Labor-Green government that is built on lies.”

Mr Bartlett says the Governor wanted to be convinced the Liberals could form stable minority government.

The Premier-in-waiting says his mission is to restore trust in Tasmania’s political system.

“Will Hodgman has been unable to do so, therefore the responsibility rests with me – the major parties hold ten seats each in the new parliament, with the Greens holding the balance of power.”

“I intend to make the Government work in the interests of all Tasmanians for the next four years.”

Mr Bartlett has less than a week to choose his new cabinet, but he would not be drawn on possible deals with the Greens.

“My first task is to sit down my parliamentary Labor Party colleagues and I’m not jumping any further ahead than that,” he said.

Greens leader Nick McKim says his party stands by its pledge to support a minority Labor Government and has urged Mr Hodgman to cooperate.

“We won’t support any no-confidence motion that Will Hodgman might move on the first day on Labor if there is no negotiated arrangement, because we’ve given a commitment not to,” he said.

“We’ve given that commitment because we absolutely believe the Tasmanian people not only deserve it but desire stable government.

“[Mr Hodgman] needs to put that disappointment behind him and not be a destabiliser or wrecker in the new parliament.”

Mr McKim says his party will not be making any demands, even though it holds the balance of power.

“Our position is unchanged on ministries – we’ve said we wouldn’t demand ministries in any negotiations, but we’ve also said that we’d consider any model of governance that has the capacity and maximises the opportunity to deliver stable government,” he said.

Mr Bartlett has not ruled out a ministerial post for the Greens in his new cabinet.

Libs seething as Labor reinstalled in Tasmania

Labor caretaker Premier David Bartlett has been asked by the state’s governor to test his support on the floor of the House of Assembly.

But the fallout from the decision has already begun, with the Liberal Party accusing Labor of acting dishonourably.

Tasmanian Governor Peter Underwood released a statement this afternoon saying he had asked Mr Bartlett to form minority government.

Mr Underwood said Mr Bartlett had an obligation to form a government so its strength could be tested on the floor of the House of Assembly.

Mr Bartlett said he was determined to make the new government work.

“I want this job and I’m very pleased that the Governor has asked me to commission a government,” he said.

“I will do everything I can to make this work. This is too important not to allow it to work.

“Jobs are at stake. Our economy is at stake.”

But yesterday Mr Bartlett advised Mr Underwood to invite the Liberals to govern because they polled more of the statewide vote.

Both leaders met the Governor again this afternoon.

After the meeting, Liberal leader Will Hodgman addressed a media conference and accused Labor of acting dishonourably.

Mr Hodgman said Mr Bartlett had broken his promise to the Tasmanian people.

He said the decision meant Tasmanians would have a Labor-Green Government with a lust for power.

Mr Hodgman said the Liberals would move a motion of no-confidence in Labor on the floor of the house.

Meanwhile Greens leader Nick McKim said the Governor had chosen the most stable option.

“I was really encouraged to hear David talking tonight about trust and the need to build trust because ultimately he’s right,” Mr McKim said.

“What the Tasmanian people have voted for is a parliament where no one party has the majority and it’s incumbent on all of us now to work as best we can constructively and co-operatively.”

Tasmanians elected a hung parliament last month with Labor and the Liberals gaining 10 seats each and the Greens five.

The Governor’s decision came after a day of drama that involved the Greens pledging their support for the incumbent Labor Government in minority.

Earlier, Mr McKim said if neither major party signed a written power-sharing deal, the Greens would support Labor.

Mr Hodgman did not comment on the Greens’ pledge but a media adviser said the party would not do deals and would not be blackmailed into negotiating.