Riots spread to three more cities in Britain

In unprecedented scenes of rioting, violence today raged across London and spread to three other cities, as police fought rioters to contain Britain's most serious unrest, raising questions over security of the 2012 Olympics.

Rioting and looting has spread across London, with unrest flaring up in the central city of Birmingham, the western city of Bristol and the northwestern city of Liverpool.

The third cricket Test between India and England is scheduled to be held at Edgbaston, Birmingham, from August 10.

On the third night of riots in London, gangs of masked youth last night looted shops, attacked police officers and set fire to vehicles and garbage dumps in raging violence, sparked by the killing of a youth in police shooting in Tottenham, reminding many of racial unrest in the 1980s.

Clashes in Hackney – one of the five boroughs in which the 2012 Olympics will be held – between police and groups of y

ouths were shown live through helicopter cameras, besides at least one car set on fire on the third night of violence.

Over 200 people have been arrested till last night as the police continued to grapple with trouble spreading to newer areas. Much investment has been made in recent years in Hackney in view of the 2012 Olympics.

Prime Minister David Cameron is returning early from holiday to discuss the unrest, which appeared to be led by youths alienated by years of underemployment which left them feeling marginalized even before the economic downturn.

Scotland Yard has deployed an extra 1,700 officers to deal with the unrest in the capital.

Violence started on Saturday in Tottenham district when a peaceful protest over the police shooting of Mark Duggan, a 29-year-old local man, turned violent. Trouble has since spread to areas of London, such as Islington, Enfield, Walthamstow, Oxford Circus and now Hackney.

zp8497586rq

Obama, Cameron to hold talks clouded by BP concerns

WASHINGTON, July 20 (Reuters) – U.S. President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron will hold talks on Tuesday overshadowed by controversy over BP Plc (BP.L)(BP.N) that could test the vaunted “special relationship” between their countries.

They are expected to discuss BP’s role in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and whether the British energy giant had influence in the release of the Lockerbie bomber from a Scottish prison last year — issues that have complicated transatlantic ties. [ID:nN19218995]

Cameron’s first visit to Washington as British prime minister comes amid a U.S. backlash against BP. With an eye to British pensioners and other investors at home, he has pledged to stand up for the embattled company.

Aides to both leaders insist the talks aim to build on a personal rapport they struck up at last month’s Group of 20 summit in Canada and that the agenda will focus more on the war in Afghanistan, the global economy and the Middle East.

But BP and its role in the worst oil spill in U.S. history loom large. Differences over BP’s treatment and over approaches to economic recovery raise fresh questions about a historic Anglo-American alliance already past its heyday.

Scoffing at “endless British preoccupation with the health of the special relationship,” Cameron wrote in the Wall Street Journal that he would be “hard-headed and realistic” about U.S. ties and said both countries must also strengthen bonds with rising powers like China and India. [ID:nLDE66I0I8]

DEMANDS FOR INQUIRY

Under heavy criticism over the Gulf disaster, BP faces demands from U.S. lawmakers for an official inquiry into whether it had a hand in the release of the Libyan convicted in the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am flight over Lockerbie, Scotland.

BP has confirmed it lobbied the British government in 2007 over a prisoner transfer deal because it was concerned a slow resolution would hurt an offshore drilling deal with Libya.

But the company said it was not involved in talks on the release of Abdel Basset al-Megrahi, sentenced to life for the deaths of 270 people, including 189 Americans.

On the eve of Cameron’s visit, the British government reiterated that BP had no role in the decision to free Megrahi and said it had no plans to re-examine the release, which took place despite fierce U.S. objections.

Scottish authorities said they freed the intelligence officer because he was terminally ill and they believed he had only three months to live. He is still alive in Libya.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told senators she was urging Scottish and British authorities to review the case.

Cameron’s aides have sought to play down the issue. He stressed in a BBC interview that, as opposition leader at the time, he thought the release was “utterly wrong.”

His visit also comes as U.S. lawmakers consider a range of rules that could require tougher safety standards on offshore drilling or bar companies like BP from new offshore leases.

Cameron has made clear he will defend BP, saying it must remain “strong and stable” to make good on its promise to compensate oil spill victims and for the sake of employees and people with pension funds invested in the company in both countries.

Obama, whose approval ratings have been undercut by public anger over the disaster, has taken a hard line with BP, although his rhetoric has softened recently amid criticism his administration had gone too in bashing the company.

Obama and Cameron will meet amid hopes a capping test on the blown-out well, which has largely choked off the undersea flow of oil, will pave the way for a permanent fix. [ID:nLDE66I13M]

UNITED FRONT, DIFFERENCES

Against this backdrop, they will present a united front on issues like sanctions against Iran and try to strike a balance between keeping up the fight in Afghanistan while signaling to skeptical voters they are progressing on exit strategies.

Obama and Cameron are sure to pay homage to their countries’ special relationship — in keeping with predecessors since Winston Churchill coined the phrase in 1946 — when they hold a joint news conference after they meet and have lunch.

But Cameron has indicated his new Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition will work together pragmatically without being too slavish to U.S. interests.

Obama has also demonstrated a desire to see relations evolve, although he has been careful to avoid offending British sensibilities as he did earlier when he returned a loaned bust of Churchill on display in the Oval Office.

Cameron has led European attempts to cut budget deficits that have ballooned in the wake of the global financial crisis, while the United States has urged caution, arguing that reducing borrowing too fast could hinder the fragile recovery.

Both sides have agreed to disagree for now.

Cameron seems unwilling to be cast as America’s “poodle” — as British media dubbed former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair to former President George W. Bush. But he has acknowledged that Britain is the “junior partner” of the United States.

With more to gain from their encounter, Cameron is also looking to benefit from sharing a stage with Obama, who is more popular in Britain and much of Europe than he is at home. (Additional reporting by Matt Falloon; Editing by John O’Callaghan)

UK to boost aid to Afghanistan – minister

July 18 (Reuters) – Britain plans to increase aid to Afghanistan by as much as 40 percent, International Development Minister Andrew Mitchell said.

Spending on international aid is one of only two areas, along with health, the coalition government has pledged to protect as it slashes departmental budgets to try to tackle a public deficit running at about 11 percent of national output.

“We have looked very carefully at the way in which British taxpayers money is being deployed as part of the effort we are making in Afghanistan,” Mitchell told the BBC in an interview broadcast on Sunday.

“We have found some additional funding from less-good programmes, so in principal have an additional 40 percent of money going into the development budget.”

The government has committed 510 million pounds ($782.3 million) to Afghanistan over the 2009-2013 period to support effective government, stability, job creation and economic growth. In 2008-2009, British bilateral aid spending to Afghanistan was 147.5 million pounds.

Defending the government’s decision to continue spending taxpayer money in other countries at a time when Britons are being warned to expect tough cuts to public services, Mitchell said it was in Britain’s national interest.

“We are making the choice not only on moral grounds but also on national interest grounds,” he said. “It is an issue of national interest because many of the problems which make our world much less secure emanate from very poor developing countries often caught up in crisis and conflict.”

Britain has 9,500 troops in Afghanistan, with many engaged in training Afghan security forces so they can gradually take over control. Prime Minister David Cameron has said he wants British combat troops home from Afghanistan within five years.

Mitchell said measures had been put in place to ensure aid money was well spent.

“We are now looking at the results we achieve for our spending,” he said. “We have a series of specific results and outcomes we want to achieve in Afghanistan and we’ve got the money to support that.” (Reporting by Kylie MacLellan)

India PM: Global economic recovery tentative

July 27 (Reuters) – Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said the global economic recovery was still tentative, required concerted efforts by countries to anchor it firmly, and suggested government spending could make up for weak private demand, an official said on Sunday.

Bonds | Global Markets

Singh made the remarks to British Prime Minister David Cameron on Saturday when the two leaders met on the sidelines of the G20 summit, Indian Foreign Ministry spokesman Vishnu Prakash told reporters.

“Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh said that India would like to see continued concerted efforts by all countries to ensure the global economic recovery gets further consolidated as the process was still somewhat tentative,” Prakash said on Sunday.

“He said the slack in private demand could be compensated by fiscal measures and stimulus packages.”

(Reporting by C.J. Kuncheria)

Act now on deficit to protect needy-UK’s Clegg

LONDON, June 14 (Reuters) – Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg will tell Britons on Monday the coalition government must act now to reduce a record budget deficit to retain control of how it tackles the problem and protect the most vulnerable.

The Liberal Democrat chief, deputy to Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron, will say in a speech the sovereign debt crisis in euro zone countries means the option of running a loose fiscal policy — which he had previously supported — no longer exists.

“By taking action, we do something hugely important — we give ourselves the chance to shape outcomes, to do all we can to bring down the deficit in a way that delivers fairness, to protect those who need it most,” he will say according to extracts of the speech released in advance.

The coalition government, formed after last month’s election failed to produce a clear winner, is seeking to prepare Britons for an era of lower public spending and higher taxation.

It has already announced 6.2 billion pounds ($9 billion) worth of spending cuts for this year.

In next week’s budget it will give more details of measures to cut a deficit of 156 billion pounds, close to 11 percent of national income and one of the highest in the developed world.

Clegg will say Britain needs to reassure markets to prevent a steep rise in the interest rate charged for its debt.

“I was in Madrid on Friday. There, the government has seen the premium they have to pay investors to buy their bonds compared to German bonds jump from a third of one per cent to two per cent in only a few weeks.

“As the nation with the highest deficit in Europe in 2010, we simply cannot afford to let that happen to us too.”

Europe is engulfed in a fiscal crisis that has led some to question whether the euro zone can survive in its present form.

Before the election Clegg supported a delay in spending cuts to avoid damaging the economy’s weak recovery from the worst recession in decades, a position still maintained by the defeated Labour Party.

But he will say the euro zone crisis has forced a change of policy — in line with that of the hawkish approach on the deficit promoted by the Conservatives, the coalition’s major partner.

“The world has changed since the days people advocated a looser fiscal policy. We need to adapt to those changing circumstances and change our fiscal position, too.

“The choices that were available to us just two months ago are no longer available. We have to take action now so that we can still be in control of our future.” (Editing by Jon Boyle)

Afghan president visits Taliban spiritual home

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan, June 13 (Reuters) – Afghan President Hamid Karzai visited the Taliban’s spiritual home on Sunday, launching a campaign that promises better governance and development alongside a security push by foreign forces.

Accompanied by the commander of foreign forces in Afghanistan, U.S. General Stanley McChrystal, Karzai pleaded for support from a gathering of several hundred elders in Kandahar, the city that launched the Taliban and the capital of the province where their insurgency is at its strongest.

“Right now the life of Kandahar is a very bad life,” he said at a conference hall in the city. “Step by step, we can go forward.”

In recent years Karzai has rarely ventured to Kandahar, where he survived an assassination attempt in 2005. He has strong family roots there, however. His brother chairs the provincial assembly and has been accused of corruption, charges he denies.

Washington’s strategy to end the nine-year-old war involves a surge of troops to improve security accompanied by development schemes that provide jobs and an improvement in government services.

Karzai’s administration has been accused in the past of not keeping its side of the bargain, but McChrystal said he believed the government was taking action now.

“I thought I saw extraordinary ownership on the part of a national leader,” he said. <^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

For more on Afghanistan click [ID:nAFPAK]

or see link.reuters.com/syx62d

Afghan blog: blogs.reuters.com/afghanistan/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

Foreign troop deployment is expected to peak at 150,000 before U.S. President Barack Obama’s planned withdrawal starts in July 2011. Visiting British Prime Minister David Cameron made clear last week he wanted his troops out as soon as possible.

This month alone some 37 foreign service members have died in Afghanistan.

Asked what changes the residents of Kandahar would notice after this operation — military officials are keen not to use the word “offensive” — McChrystal said:

“I think it won’t look shockingly different than it does now. … I think it may feel very different.”

“There will be more ANP (police). I think more mothers will feel comfortable with their husbands going to the mosque to pray. I think there will be fewer killings. I think there will be a sense that some of the constricting or menacing pressure on the part of the insurgency has been released.

And I hope it is also matched by improvements in governance.”

Karzai’s brother, Ahmed Wali Karzi, said the Kandahar operation was welcomed by locals. But some remained sceptical.

“In Afghanistan, people first see and then believe,” said Ghulam Jilani Popal, head of the Afghan Independent Directorate of Local Government. (Writing by David Fox from pool notes; Editing by Elizabeth Fullerton) (For more Reuters coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan, see: here)

BP will decide its own dividend: UK minister

(Reuters) – Energy giant BP, under pressure in the United States to suspend its dividend to help pay for damage from a huge oil spill, will decide its own dividend, Foreign Secretary William Hague said on Sunday.

U.S. | Green Business | Gulf Oil Spill

Britain and the United States sought to patch up tensions over the Gulf of Mexico spill in a telephone call between U.S. President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron on Saturday.

Asked if there would be no more talk about British-based BP having to consult U.S. politicians on its dividend policy, Hague told the BBC: “BP will decide on its own dividend, of course.”

Hague said BP must “do its utmost to stop this oil spill, to deal with it satisfactorily on a permanent basis and to do everything it possibly can to mitigate the consequences.”

He said the British government was offering large quantities of chemical dispersant to the United States to help with the spill.

(Reporting by Adrian Croft; Editing by Alison Williams)

BP will decide its own dividend-UK minister

June 13 (Reuters) – Energy giant BP (BP.L)(BP.N), under pressure in the United States to suspend its dividend to help pay for damage from a huge oil spill, will decide its own dividend, Foreign Secretary William Hague said on Sunday.

Britain and the United States sought to patch up tensions over the Gulf of Mexico spill in a telephone call between U.S. President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron on Saturday.

Asked if there would be no more talk about British-based BP having to consult U.S. politicians on its dividend policy, Hague told the BBC: “BP will decide on its own dividend, of course.”

Hague said BP must “do its utmost to stop this oil spill, to deal with it satisfactorily on a permanent basis and to do everything it possibly can to mitigate the consequences”.

He said the British government was offering large quantities of chemical dispersant to the United States to help with the spill. (Reporting by Adrian Croft; Editing by Alison Williams)

UK PM Cameron to talk to Obama on BP on Saturday

June 11 (Reuters) – British Prime Minister David Cameron will discuss issues including the BP oil spill with U.S. President Barack Obama on Saturday, the prime minister’s spokesman said on Friday.

Stocks | Global Markets

The call would take place on Saturday afternoon (London time), the spokesman said. (Reporting by Estelle Shirbon; editing by Keith Weir)

UK’s Cameron to discuss BP with Obama at weekend

June 10 (Reuters) – British Prime Minister David Cameron is likely to speak to U.S. President Barack Obama over the weekend and BP is sure to be among the topics discussed, the prime minister’s official spokesman said on Thursday.

Stocks | Global Markets

“There is likely to be a call at the weeekend. They will be discussing a range of issues … I’m sure that BP will be one of the topics discussed,” the spokesman said during a routine briefing to reporters. (Reporting by Estelle Shirbon)

Cameron says Britain must heed Greek warning

MILTON KEYNES, England, June 7 (Reuters) – Prime Minister David Cameron told Britons on Monday the scale of the country’s budget problems was even worse than he had anticipated and cited crisis-hit Greece as an example of the risk of failing to act.

Cameron painted a bleak backdrop two weeks ahead of an emergency budget on June 22 in which his coalition government will give more details of measures to cut a deficit running at 11 percent of national output.

Giving few details of where cuts will come, he attacked the previous Labour government for economic mistakes over the past decade that he said had left the legacy of a debt crisis.

“Greece stands as a warning of what happens to countries that lose their credibility, or whose governments pretend that difficult decisions can somehow be avoided,” Cameron said in a speech in Milton Keynes, central England.

“I want to set out for the country … why the overall scale of the problem is even worse than we thought,” he said, adding that the structural nature of the debt meant “a return to (economic) growth will not sort it out”.

Cameron said the public sector had grown too large under Labour. If no action were taken, within five years its debt-servicing costs would be more than it spends on schools in England, climate change and transport combined.

“Based on the calculations of the last government, in five years’ time the interest we are paying on our debt, the interest alone is predicted to be around 70 billion pounds ($101 billion). That is a simply staggering amount.” [ID:nCAM070610]

G20 SUPPORT

Cameron said the weekend summit in South Korea of the Group of 20 leading economies had endorsed the steps taken by Britain. The government, which took office last month, has already trimmed six billion pounds in costs to start to reduce a deficit that reached 156 billion pounds in the financial year to April.

In opposition, Labour has warned that cuts planned by the coalition risks killing off a fragile economic recovery and throwing Britain into a double-dip recession.

Cameron acknowledged the cuts to come would hurt a government still enjoying something of a honeymoon with voters.

“This is fraught with danger. This is a very, very difficult thing we are trying to do,” he said in answer to questions at distance learning institute the Open University.

Cameron heads Britain’s first coalition government since 1945, his centre-right Conservatives having teamed up with the smaller Liberal Democrats after last month’s election.

Flanked by Lib Dem Treasury minister Danny Alexander, Cameron said the coalition would make it easier to win over the public, saying there were “two parties together facing up to the British people.”

Economist Alan Clarke of BNP Paribas said it was natural for a new government to lay the blame for ills at the door of its predecessor and that the message for the budget was clear.

“Fiscal tightening, spending cuts and tax increases are going to bear down on growth and disposable income. It’s going to hold back growth which is going to hold back inflation. It’s not going to be pleasant for anyone,” Clarke said.

Finance minister George Osborne and Treasury number two Alexander will present on Tuesday the framework for a spending review this year.

The Treasury is expected to consult on the spending review with the private sector, voluntary organisations, trade unions and the general public. (Additional reporting by Matt Falloon, Tim Castle and Peter Griffiths; Editing by Ruth Pitchford)

UK, Canada highlight bank levy ahead of G20 meeting

(Reuters) – British Prime Minister David Cameron said on Thursday that his country and G20 host Canada had differences in their approach to a global banking levy.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, speaking at a meeting with Cameron, said the bank levy would be a very lively subject of discussion at the G20. Harper said he agreed that taxpayers should not foot the bill for bank bailouts.

Harper’s government, which hosts G8 and G20 meetings later this month, strongly opposes proposals for a global bank tax, arguing that strong regulations kept Canadian banks sound through the global financial crisis and other nations should follow its example.

Britain’s new Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government has pledged to introduce a banking levy but has given no details. It has said it could act unilaterally.

(Reporting by; Editing by)

UK, Canada highlight bank levy ahead of G20 meeting

June 3 (Reuters) – British Prime Minister David Cameron said on Thursday that his country and G20 host Canada had differences in their approach to a global banking levy.

Regulatory News | Bonds | Global Markets

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, speaking at a meeting with Cameron, said the bank levy would be a very lively subject of discussion at the G20. Harper said he agreed that taxpayers should not foot the bill for bank bailouts.

Harper’s government, which hosts G8 and G20 meetings later this month, strongly opposes proposals for a global bank tax, arguing that strong regulations kept Canadian banks sound through the global financial crisis and other nations should follow its example.

Britain’s new Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government has pledged to introduce a banking levy but has given no details. It has said it could act unilaterally. (Reporting by; Editing by)

Britain’s coalition says no change on budget plan

LONDON, May 31 (Reuters) – British Prime Minister David Cameron’s new coalition government is committed to cutting a gaping budget deficit despite the resignation of a finance minister over his expenses claims, officials said on Monday.

They said the loss of Chief Treasury Secretary David Laws, number two at the finance ministry, would have no impact on the Conservative-led government’s plans to push through tough austerity measures in an emergency budget on June 22.

“I think in the first three weeks the government has now clearly demonstrated its commitment to getting on with tackling the deficit and debt,” Justice Secretary Ken Clarke told the BBC in an interview.

Clarke, a former Conservative finance minister, said it was obvious around the cabinet table that there was no division of opinion between Cameron’s Conservatives and their Liberal Democrat partners.

At the weekend Cameron appointed Danny Alexander, a former close aide to Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg, to replace Laws as number two to Conservative Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne.

“Danny has all the intelligence, ability, potential, required for the task,” said Clarke.

The Financial Times quoted an unnamed aide to Cameron as saying: “I can safely say the strategy and direction (of the coalition government) will not change at all.”

The coalition is drawing up cuts to rein in Britain’s record peacetime budget deficit, which exceeds 11 percent of gross domestic product.

LAWS’ RESIGNATION

Laws resigned on Saturday within 24 hours of a newspaper reporting the Liberal Democrat politician had claimed tens of thousands of pounds in parliamentary expenses for rent he passed on to his long-term male partner.

The loss of Laws occurred less than three weeks after the formation of Britain’s first coalition for 65 years. The coalition took power after a May 6 election ousted the Labour Party from 13 years in office.

Laws, an economist with a background in London’s financial services industry, was a key player in striking the coalition accord and appeared to have struck up an effective relationship with Osborne.

He had won the respect of his Conservative colleagues and his willingness to make cuts had reassured markets worried about a deficit forecast to top 160 billion pounds this year.

Alexander will now take over the role of seeing through a series of tough austerity measures needed to save Britain billions of pounds.

The loss of Laws is an unwelcome distraction for a new government eager to focus on the economic challenges and to start a new chapter after a scandal over parliamentary expenses that dogged the final months of the previous Labour government.

Cameron had promised a new, open administration that abides by strict rules of conduct.

Alexander, who is 38, was little known outside parliament before the election. [ID:nLDE64S0IE]

He rose to prominence during the election campaign as Clegg’s chief of staff and as a negotiator in the days of talks that led to the formation of Britain’s first coalition government since World War Two.

The coalition agreement is a delicate balance of the two parties’ policy priorities. By appointing another Liberal Democrat to replace Laws, Cameron has been careful not to upset the party balance in the coalition cabinet.

(Editing by Ralph Gowling)

Cameron says Britain must rebalance its economy

Prime Minister David Cameron said on Friday that Britain must rebalance an economy that has become over-indebted, unstable and too dependent on the public sector.

In excerpts released in advance of a speech he was due to give later on Friday in northern England, Cameron said the British economy had been heading in the wrong direction for years, was over-reliant on welfare and increasingly hostile to enterprise.

It was billed as his first major speech since he became prime minister this month, ending 13 years of Labour Party rule.

Cameron, whose centre-right Conservatives formed a coalition with the smaller, centre-left Liberal Democrats after a May 6 election failed to produce an outright winner, has set reducing Britain’s large budget deficit as his top priority.

“As a country we have become indebted on an unprecedented scale. Our huge public debt is the clearest manifestation of our economic mistakes — the glaring warning sign overhead telling us we have taken the wrong route,” he said.

“We have been sleepwalking our way to an economy that is unsustainable, unstable, unfair and, frankly, uninspiring.”

The economy had become “far too dependent on the public sector, with over half of all jobs created in the last 10 years associated in some way with public spending,” he said.

Referring to London’s financial services industry which drove British growth for years before being jolted by the financial crisis, Cameron said the economy had become increasingly unbalanced, “with our fortunes hitched to a few industries in one corner of the country, while we let other sectors like manufacturing slide.”

Cameron said he believed Britain could rebalance economic power across different regions and industries, inject new life into the private sector and move to an economy built on savings and investment rather than debt and borrowing.

“We have set out a series of clear, transparent benchmarks for our economy, from ensuring macroeconomic stability to creating more balanced growth, getting Britain working and ensuring our whole country shares in rising prosperity,” he said.

Cameron’s coalition outlined this week 6.2 billion pounds ($8.9 billion) of spending cuts this year. Further action to tackle a deficit running at 11 percent of GDP — just a few percentage points below that of Greece — is expected in an emergency budget on June 22.

However, senior lawmakers from Cameron’s Conservative Party are unhappy at plans to raise capital gains tax to bring it close to income tax rates, a policy promoted by the Lib Dems.

Cameron inherited an economy just emerging from deep recession. The Office for National Statistics said this week the economy grew by 0.3 percent in the first quarter, up from an initial estimate of 0.2 percent.

(Reporting by Adrian Croft; Editing by Noah Barkin)

Peerage for Indian tycoon who gave Tories 200,000 pounds

London, May 27 (IANS) A Ugandan-born Indian business tycoon, who gave the Conservatives over 200,000 pounds in donations, will be nominated for a British peerage by Prime Minister David Cameron.

Dolar Popat, who is a self-made multimillionaire, will get a seat in the House of Lords. He has an estimated fortune of 42 million pounds, Daily Mail reported Thursday.

Popat’s family fled from Idi Amin’s regime; when he arrived from Uganda as a 17-year-old in 1971, he had just 10 pounds in his pocket.

He has helped bankroll Tory frontbenchers, including International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell and Cabinet Minister Baroness Sayeeda Warsi.

Popat, 55, has also made a string of donations to fellow Ugandan-born MP Shailesh Vara’s constituency.

He began his career by working as a waiter at a Wimpy restaurant and later became an accountant. He then formed a firm that advised small companies on raising capital. His wealth jumped after he set up the TLC Group that owns hotels and care homes across Britain.

At a dinner of the Hindus in Britain Forum, Popat said that multi-culturalism had stopped working. ‘There are too many immigrants of too many kinds,’ he was quoted as saying.

‘When I first came to Britain in 1971 there were the Scots, the Irish, the Indians, Pakistanis and the Afro-Caribbeans here. Now we have a large number of people from different parts of Africa and Eastern Europe.’

The peerage issue has, however, come in for criticism.

Conservative MP Mark Field said that appointments to the House of Lords may become the next big political scandal.

He called for a wholly elected House of Lords, adding: ‘Conservatives should ideally take the lead here by restricting any future patronage to the House of Lords to those taking up ministerial appointments.

‘Mark my words, the appointment of peers has the potential to be the next parliamentary scandal in the making. I hope that the Conservative leadership will once more show itself ahead of the curve.’

UK govt plans political reform, financial restraint

Britain’s new coalition government set out plans on Tuesday to reform the electoral system and cut state interference in people’s lives, while tackling a record budget deficit.

The Conservative-Liberal Democrat alliance, Britain’s first coalition for 65 years, also plans to allow private investment in state-owned distribution business Royal Mail, setting the scene for an early clash with trade unions who sharply criticised the new government’s programme.

In a speech delivered on its behalf by Queen Elizabeth at the formal state opening of parliament, the government also proposed legislation to give British people a say on any further transfer of powers to the European Union.

Analysts said the programme of 22 bills, to go before parliament between now and late next year, was an ambitious start to a new era after Labour lost power for the first time since 1997.

The formalities over, Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron attacked Labour’s record, saying the party’s policies had resulted in “an economy that is nearly bankrupt, a society that is broken and a political system that is bust”.

The centre-right Conservatives and smaller, left-leaning Lib Dems took office after an election on May 6, swiftly smoothing over differences on issues such as when to start cutting a deficit running at over 11 percent of national output.

The Treasury set out plans on Monday to trim an initial 6.2 billion pounds ($8.9 billion) from the deficit.

Further cuts are expected in an emergency budget to be presented in four weeks and the deficit issue cast a long shadow over the programme.

DEFICIT CUTS A PRIORITY

“The first priority is to reduce the deficit and restore economic growth,” the queen said in her speech.

“Action will be taken to accelerate the reduction of the structural budget deficit. A new Office for Budget Responsibility will provide confidence in the management of the public finances.”

The office will be led by economist Alan Budd and will take on the task of forecasting economic growth and borrowing needs.

Figures published on Tuesday showed Britain’s economy grew by 0.3 percent in the first quarter of the year in a modest recovery from an 18-month recession.

The coalition tapped into a sense the previous Labour government had extended its reach too far into the lives of ordinary Britons, proposing a Freedom (Great Repeal) Bill to limit the use of CCTV, the storage of DNA samples and e-mail records and to protect the right to peaceful protest.

Led by Cameron and his Lib Dem deputy Nick Clegg, the government is enjoying a political honeymoon, with media largely supportive and markets calmed by first steps on the deficit.

Half of Britons approve of Cameron and Clegg after their first few days in office, pollster Angus Reid said on Tuesday.

However, unions, who traditionally back Labour, signalled that they would give the government a rough ride.

Mark Serwotka, head of the Public and Commercial Services Union whose 300,000 members include many civil servants, urged unions and community groups to defend public services.

Tensions also are lurking below the surface between lawmakers from the two coalition parties.

Former Conservative minister Peter Lilley touched on these when he said he would campaign against changes to the voting system in a referendum, a key Lib Dem demand.

Analysts said the government had outlined an ambitious programme but the acid test would be how the coalition hung together when managing unexpected turbulence.

“Potentially this is clearly a radical agenda. If all 22 bills go through, Britain is going to be a different place,” Bristol University politics professor Mark Wickham-Jones said.

(Additional reporting by Adrian Croft, Estelle Shirbon, Tim Castle; editing by Michael Roddy)

West plays down Iran gesture, sticks to sanctions drive

Western powers said on Tuesday Iran’s continued stockpiling of enriched uranium devalued its deal to give up some of its potential nuclear bomb material, signalling Tehran would not evade more sanctions this way.

Under the deal agreed with Turkey and Brazil last week, Iran would send 1.2 tonnes of its low-enriched uranium (LEU) to Turkey for safekeeping until Tehran received specially processed fuel for its medical isotope reactor around a year later.

But Western critics said the accord, echoing one brokered by the U.N. nuclear watchdog in October involving the same amount of LEU, would still leave Iran with enough material for one bomb, if enriched to high purity, since it is estimated to have almost doubled its LEU reserve with daily enrichment since then.

The United States, France and Russia — parties to the original deal in principle — saw it as a way to divest Iran of enough LEU to prevent covert “weaponisation”, while giving Iran the means to maintain care for some 850,000 cancer patients.

But U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton condemned Iran’s gesture, six months after it backed away from the accord, as a “transparent ploy to avoid (U.N.) Security Council action” to pass a fourth Iran sanctions resolution now on the table.

Clinton, speaking after talks with Chinese leaders in Beijing, and French officials said Iran’s launch of higher-level enrichment in February seemed to eclipse any fuel swap deal.

“We discussed at some length (with the Chinese) the shortcomings of the recent proposal put forward by Iran … There are a number of deficiencies with it that do not answer the concerns of the international community,” Clinton said.

British Prime Minister David Cameron said that even if Iran followed through on the deal, it would still retain half of its LEU reserve — sufficient for one nuclear warhead.

HARSHER SANCTIONS STAY ON TABLE

“I believe it is time to ratchet up that pressure, and the timetable is short. This government has a clear objective to ensure stronger U.N. and EU sanctions against Iran,” Cameron said during parliamentary debate in London on Tuesday.

France’s Foreign Ministry spokesman said Iran’s extended uranium enrichment activities were problematic for its proposal, conveyed on Monday to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which passed it on to Paris, Washington and Moscow.

Iran’s simultaneous reiteration that it would not rein in enrichment in any way, defying a series of resolutions by the IAEA and Security Council, “is being taken into account and it’s part of the problem,” spokesman Bernard Valero said.

“At the time (of the October deal) we were talking about 1,200 kilogrammes and now the stockpile must be around 2-2,400 kilogrammes,” Valero said. “There’s a bit of a difference between the two and that is also part of the problem.”

Iran insists its uranium enrichment programme is for solely peaceful purposes of electricity generation and medical care. But it has a history of hiding sensitive nuclear activity from the IAEA and continues to restrict U.N. inspections.

In Moscow on Tuesday, Iran’s ambassador to Russia was quoted by Interfax news agency as warning that Tehran would reconsider the new deal if further sanctions were imposed. Iran has called for renewed talks with the big powers on details of the pact.

“If there are new sanctions, it will become obvious to the Iranian public that the ’5 + 1′ group is hiding evil intentions and pursuing political objectives. This would force us to revise the Tehran accords,” Mahmoud Reza Sadjadi was quoted as saying.

“We believe that by this (deal) Iran has demonstrated its goodwill,” Sadjadi said. “After all that lobbying by Brazil, Turkey and other countries, we believe that it makes no sense to talk about new sanctions.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, Iran’s arch regional enemy, dismissed Tehran’s nuclear offer as “empty”.

“(That’s because Iran)…continues to enrich uranium it has at a high level, and reserves the right, according to this proposal, to take (what) it’s meant to transfer to Turkey back to Iran at any time,” Netanyahu told the Israeli parliament.

The draft sanctions resolution agreed by six world powers — the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and France — last week is being discussed with other Security Council members for what Washington hopes will be approval next month.

The extended sanctions provisions would target Iranian banks and call for high-sea inspections of vessels suspected of carrying cargo related to Iran’s nuclear or missile programmes.

(Additional reporting by Tim Castle in London, Vicky Buffery in Paris, Ari Rabinowitch in Jerusalem, Dmitry Solovyov in Moscow; Writing by Mark Heinrich; Editing by Michael Roddy)

HIGHLIGHTS – UK PM Cameron speaks in parliament

British Prime Minister David Cameron gave a speech in parliament on Tuesday after the new government unveiled its legislative programme.

Following are key quotes.

BANKING REFORM:

“We are going to bring some law and order to the banking system that Labour allowed to wreck our economy. There will be more powers to the Bank of England in our financial services regulation bill and we’ll get to grips with the unacceptable bonus culture and open up credit lines for small businesses. We want to make sure our banks serve our economy rather than the other way round.”

IRAN:

“Even if Iran were to complete the deal proposed in their recent agreement with Turkey and Brazil, it would still retain around 50 percent of its stockpile of low enriched uranium, and it is this stockpile that could be enriched to weapons grade uranium.

“For the last six years we have pursued a twin-track policy offering engagement, but being prepared to apply pressure.

“I believe it is time to ratchet up that pressure, and the timetable is short.

“This government has a clear objective to ensure stronger U.N. and EU sanctions against Iran.”

(Reporting by Estelle Shirbon and Tim Castle)

Sydney traffic bad and getting worse: survey

A survey of small businesses has found more than 80 per cent believe congestion in Sydney has got worse in the last year.

Motoring organisation NRMA surveyed 382 businesses that are members of its roadside assistance service.

It found that more than a third of respondents have changed their business habits as a result of congestion.

75 per cent said their journey to work was longer that a year ago, while 42 per cent have incurred costs as high as $10,000 because of congestion.

NRMA President Wendy Machin says business owners are frustrated with the New South Wales Government for not doing more to fix the problem.

She says some businesses have been forced to move outside the CBD.

“That’s a real indictment on a major city like Sydney to think that we’re forcing people out of the place where they want to do business because the traffic is simply too bad for them to do business there,” she said.

The New South Wales Business Chamber’s Paul Ritchie says incentives are needed so people travel at different times.

“According to the RTA, 20 per cent of peak travel is related to parents taking their children to school,” he said.

“So how can we create some incentives in terms of different starting times for schools?”

The New South Wales Transport Minister David Campbell says the number of vehicles on some Sydney’s roads has risen, but travel times have not increased significantly.

“Traffic on Sydney’s major roads has increased by 46 per cent over the past 18 years but travel times on Sydney’s most important roads has remained steady,” he said.

“[That's] through a mix of large infrastructure projects and smaller initiatives, such as the pinch point program, and improving public transport.”