Factbox: Afghanistan: Who is fighting the insurgency?

July 18 – Afghan government, backed by thousands of international force are fighting a growing insurgency in Afghanistan since the Islamist movement was toppled by U.S.-led coalition and Afghan forces in late 2001 in the wake of September 11 attacks on the United States.

Despite repeated peace overtures by President Hamid Karzai to Taliban and other insurgent groups, only the Hezb-i-Islami movement has shown interest, sending their delegates to meet Afghan officials in Kabul earlier this year. However, there was no breakthrough.

In a major international conference this week in Kabul, one of the main themes of Afghan government will be to boost its reintegration efforts to woo low-level fighters who make up the backbone of Taliban insurgency.

There are three main militant groups in the country that lead a bloody insurgency campaign against the Afghan government and around 150,000 foreign troops under NATO’s command.

There are now some 20,000 to 30,000 active fighters within their ranks, according to a government official.

TALIBAN

A Talib, singular form for Taliban means a religious student. The group rose to power in 1994 in southern city of Kandahar under the leadership of Mullah Mohammad Omar who was then imam of a village mosque.

The puritan religious student mostly drawn from seminaries, run in the lawless tribal areas of neighboring Pakistan offered a simple but harsh form of Islamic Justice that appealed to many who were weary of brutal warlords who ignited a bloody civil when the Soviets departed from Afghanistan in 1989.

After years of factional fighting among the anti-Soviet groups over power, Mullah Omar’s young and fanatical fighters managed to capture Kabul in September 1996 where they imposed ultra strict Islamic sharia by banning music, TV and forbidding women to work and girls to school.

After being toppled in 2001, most of the leaders, including Mullah Omar, fled to Pakistan where they formed a council called “Quetta Shura,” a Pakistani city in the province of Balochistan.

The Taliban began to regroup in the south then relaunched their insurgency in 2005 with a wave of guerrilla attacks, suicide and roadside bombs that has grown steadily ever since.

Violence in the country has sharpened, threatening thousands of NATO and bulk of Afghan troops into a stalemate.

Karzai’s idea of peace negotiations to reach out to insurgents who denounce violence and accept Afghan constitution has the backing of international community, but the Taliban have repeatedly rejected the offer, saying foreign troops should leave the country before start of any peace talks.

HAQQANI NETWORK

Headed by Jalaluddin Haqqani, the Haqqani network is allied with the Taliban and is believed to have close links to al Qaeda. It has been behind several high-profile attacks in Afghanistan including an assassination attempt on President Hamid Karzai during a military parade in 2008, and last month attacked a major peace assembly.

Although the attacks caused no serious casualties, President Karzai sacked his interior and intelligence agency chiefs over security lapses.

Haqqani rose to prominence during the 1980s, receiving weapons and funds from the CIA and Saudi Arabia to fight the Soviet occupation and has also had long-standing links with Pakistan’s military Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).

Effective leadership of the group has now passed from Jalaluddin, who is in his 70s, to his more radical eldest son Sirajuddin, security analysts say.

Sirajuddin told Reuters last year that his group, mainly active in the eastern parts of Afghanistan and based in the North Waziristan of Pakistan, was under the overall command of Mullah Omar and admitted ties with al Qaeda.

HEZB-I-ISLAMI

Hezb-i-Islami or the Islamic Party was founded by veteran former Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar in mid 1970s was one of the main mujahideen groups fighting the Soviet invasion in the 1980s from its base in Pakistan. It received the lion’s share of U.S. and Saudi arms and money channeled through the Pakistani intelligence service.

After the Soviet withdrawal Hekmatyar fought and made fleeting alliances with most other mujahideen factions during the resulting civil war and is blamed for killing thousands in Kabul with indiscriminate rocket attacks on the capital.

By the rise of the Taliban in 1994, Hekmatyar was sidelined by Pakistan in favor of Mullah Omar and after losing to their forces when the Taliban took Kabul in 1996, Hekmatyar fled to Iran.

Many of his fighters joined the Taliban ranks. He served briefly as prime minister in 1996 before the Taliban took control.

After the September 11 attacks Hekmatyar declared himself against the U.S. invasion and took up the fight in alliance with the Taliban. Its fighters number in thousands are most active in the east of the country and in pockets in the north.

In March this year, a high-profile Hezb delegation met Karzai and a U.N. special envoy in Kabul. Although the talks appeared to be preliminary, the public acknowledgement of meeting was unprecedented and could signal a division within the insurgency.

An Afghan army general, Murad Ali Murad, told Reuters this month that members of Hezb was supplying intelligence on Taliban whereabouts to NATO and the Afghan government that led to the killing or arrest of several key commanders in the north.

(For more Reuters coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan, see: here) (Compiled by the Kabul Bureau; Editing by David Fox) (hamid.shalizi@thomsonreuters.com; +93 799 390 693

(If you have a query or comment on this story, send an email to news.feedback.asia@thomsonreuters.com)

FACTBOX-Afghanistan: Who is fighting the insurgency?

July 18 – Afghan government, backed by thousands of international force are fighting a growing insurgency in Afghanistan since the Islamist movement was toppled by U.S.-led coalition and Afghan forces in late 2001 in the wake of Sept. 11 attacks on the United States.

Despite repeated peace overtures by President Hamid Karzai to Taliban and other insurgent groups, only the Hezb-i-Islami movement has shown interest, sending their delegates to meet Afghan officials in Kabul earlier this year. However, there was no breakthrough.

In a major international conference this week in Kabul, one of the main themes of Afghan government will be to boost its reintegration efforts to woo low-level fighters who make up the backbone of Taliban insurgency.

There are three main militant groups in the country that lead a bloody insurgency campaign against the Afghan government and around 150,000 foreign troops under NATO’s command.

There are now some 20,000 to 30,000 active fighters within their ranks, according to a government official.

TALIBAN

A Talib, singular form for Taliban means a religious student. The group rose to power in 1994 in southern city of Kandahar under the leadership of Mullah Mohammad Omar who was then imam of a village mosque.

The puritan religious student mostly drawn from seminaries, run in the lawless tribal areas of neighboring Pakistan offered a simple but harsh form of Islamic Justice that appealed to many who were weary of brutal warlords who ignited a bloody civil when the Soviets departed from Afghanistan in 1989.

After years of factional fighting among the anti-Soviet groups over power, Mullah Omar’s young and fanatical fighters managed to capture Kabul in September 1996 where they imposed ultra strict Islamic sharia by banning music, TV and forbidding women to work and girls to school.

After being toppled in 2001, most of the leaders, including Mullah Omar, fled to Pakistan where they formed a council called “Quetta Shura”, a Pakistani city in the province of Balochistan.

The Taliban began to regroup in the south then relaunched their insurgency in 2005 with a wave of guerrilla attacks, suicide and roadside bombs that has grown steadily ever since.

Violence in the country has sharpened, threatening thousands of NATO and bulk of Afghan troops into a stalemate.

Karzai’s idea of peace negotiations to reach out to insurgents who denounce violence and accept Afghan constitution has the backing of international community, but the Taliban have repeatedly rejected the offer, saying foreign troops should leave the country before start of any peace talks.

HAQQANI NETWORK

Headed by Jalaluddin Haqqani, the Haqqani network is allied with the Taliban and is believed to have close links to al Qaeda. It has been behind several high-profile attacks in Afghanistan including an assassination attempt on President Hamid Karzai during a military parade in 2008, and last month attacked a major peace assembly.

Although the attacks caused no serious casualties, President Karzai sacked his interior and intelligence agency chiefs over security lapses.

Haqqani rose to prominence during the 1980s, receiving weapons and funds from the CIA and Saudi Arabia to fight the Soviet occupation and has also had long-standing links with Pakistan’s military Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).

Effective leadership of the group has now passed from Jalaluddin, who is in his 70s, to his more radical eldest son Sirajuddin, security analysts say.

Sirajuddin told Reuters last year that his group, mainly active in the eastern parts of Afghanistan and based in the North Waziristan of Pakistan, was under the overall command of Mullah Omar and admitted ties with al Qaeda.

HEZB-I-ISLAMI

Hezb-i-Islami or the Islamic Party was founded by veteran former Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar in mid 1970s was one of the main mujahideen groups fighting the Soviet invasion in the 1980s from its base in Pakistan. It received the lion’s share of U.S. and Saudi arms and money channelled through the Pakistani intelligence service.

After the Soviet withdrawal Hekmatyar fought and made fleeting alliances with most other mujahideen factions during the resulting civil war and is blamed for killing thousands in Kabul with indiscriminate rocket attacks on the capital.

By the rise of the Taliban in 1994, Hekmatyar was sidelined by Pakistan in favour of Mullah Omar and after losing to their forces when the Taliban took Kabul in 1996, Hekmatyar fled to Iran.

Many of his fighters joined the Taliban ranks. He served briefly as prime minister in 1996 before the Taliban took control.

After the Sept. 11 attacks Hekmatyar declared himself against the U.S. invasion and took up the fight in alliance with the Taliban. Its fighters number in thousands are most active in the east of the country and in pockets in the north.

In March this year, a high-profile Hezb delegation met Karzai and a U.N. special envoy in Kabul. Although the talks appeared to be preliminary, the public acknowledgement of meeting was unprecedented and could signal a division within the insurgency.

An Afghan army general, Murad Ali Murad, told Reuters this month that members of Hezb was supplying intelligence on Taliban whereabouts to NATO and the Afghan government that led to the killing or arrest of several key commanders in the north. (For more Reuters coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan, see: here) (Compiled by the Kabul Bureau; Editing by David Fox) (hamid.shalizi@thomsonreuters.com; +93 799 390 693 (If you have a query or comment on this story, send an email to news.feedback.asia@thomsonreuters.com)

Factbox: What are the major issues between India and Pakistan?

The talks between S.M. Krishna of India and Shah Mehmood Qureshi of Pakistan are widely seen as the first step in trying to revive a peace process broken off in the wake of the attacks on India’s financial capital.

Here are some of the main issues between the neighbors:

SECURITY

For India, security is the top issue. It has refused to resume a series of talks known as the composite dialogue until Pakistan takes more action against Pakistan-based militant groups.

In particular, India wants Pakistan to show it is serious in reining in the militants behind the Mumbai attacks, in which 166 people were killed.

This is complicated by Indian suspicions that the Pakistan security establishment backed the militants in some way. On the eve of the talks, Indian Home Secretary G.K. Pillai escalated the charges and directly blamed Pakistan’s powerful Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency for the attacks.

“It was not just a peripheral role,” he was quoted as saying by the Indian Express newspaper. “They were literally controlling and coordinating it from the beginning till the end.”

For its part, Pakistan accuses India of backing separatists in its Baluchistan province and providing weapons and funding to Pakistan Taliban groups, charges India denies.

KASHMIR

The divided, mostly Muslim Himalayan region of Kashmir is at the heart of hostility between the neighbors and was the cause of two of their three wars since independence from Britain in 1947. The third was over the founding of Bangladesh.

Separatists began an insurgency against Indian rule in 1989 — a movement almost immediately backed by Pakistan — and since then tens of thousands of people have been killed. Most fighters want all of Kashmir to become part of Pakistan but many ordinary Kashmiris want independence from both India and Pakistan.

Krishna and Qureshi will have to sidestep another danger — getting bogged down in a blame game over ongoing anti-government protests in a part of Kashmir held by India.

Violent anti-government protests have swept India-controlled Kashmir for almost a month. The region is under an army lockdown.

WATER

The two countries disagree over use of the water flowing down rivers that rise in Indian Kashmir and run into the Indus river basin in Pakistan.

The use of the water is governed by the 1960 Indus Water Treaty under which India was granted the use of water from three eastern rivers, and Pakistan the use of three western rivers.

Pakistan says India is unfairly diverting water with the upstream construction of barrages and dams. India denies the charge.

SIACHEN

Indian and Pakistani forces have faced off against each other in mountains above the Siachen glacier in the Karakoram range, the world’s highest battlefield, since 1984.

The two sides have been trying to find a solution that would allow them to withdraw troops, but India says it is unwilling to bring its forces down until Pakistan officially authenticates the positions they hold.

Pakistan has said it is willing to do so but on the condition that it is not a final endorsement of India’s claim over the glacier, a source of meltwater for Pakistan’s rivers.

AFGHANISTAN

Afghanistan has become a major source of friction, although Indian and Pakistani differences over Pakistan’s western neighbor have not been a part of their official talks.

The two countries have long competed for influence there and Pakistan is deeply suspicious of a rise in India’s presence after the fall of the Islamabad-backed Taliban government in 2001.

It accuses India of using Afghanistan as a base to create problems inside Pakistan, including backing separatists in its Baluchistan province. India denies the accusations, saying its focus is on development.

This rivalry is complicating U.S.-led efforts to end an intensifying Taliban insurgency and bring stability to Afghanistan more than eight years after the Taliban were ousted.

(Compiled by Chris Allbritton and Zeeshan Haider in Islamabad; Editing by Sugita Katyal)

FACTBOX-What are the major issues between India and Pakistan?

(Reuters) – The foreign ministers of nuclear-armed rivals Pakistan and India are holding their first substantive talks since the Mumbai attacks of 2008 in Islamabad on Thursday. [ID:nSGE66D0EY]

The talks between S.M. Krishna of India and Shah Mehmood Qureshi of Pakistan are widely seen as the first step in trying to revive a peace process broken off in the wake of the attacks on India’s financial capital.

Here are some of the main issues between the neighbours:

SECURITY

For India, security is the top issue. It has refused to resume a series of talks known as the composite dialogue until Pakistan takes more action against Pakistan-based militant groups.

In particular, India wants Pakistan to show it is serious in reining in the militants behind the Mumbai attacks, in which 166 people were killed.

This is complicated by Indian suspicions that the Pakistan security establishment backed the militants in some way. On the eve of the talks, Indian Home Secretary G.K. Pillai escalated the charges and directly blamed Pakistan’s powerful Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency for the attacks.

“It was not just a peripheral role,” he was quoted as saying by the Indian Express newspaper. “They were literally controlling and coordinating it from the beginning till the end.”

For its part, Pakistan accuses India of backing separatists in its Baluchistan province and providing weapons and funding to Pakistan Taliban groups, charges India denies.

KASHMIR

The divided, mostly Muslim Himalayan region of Kashmir is at the heart of hostility between the neighbours and was the cause of two of their three wars since independence from Britain in 1947. The third was over the founding of Bangladesh.

Separatists began an insurgency against Indian rule in 1989 — a movement almost immediately backed by Pakistan — and since then tens of thousands of people have been killed. Most fighters want all of Kashmir to become part of Pakistan but many ordinary Kashmiris want independence from both India and Pakistan.

Krishna and Qureshi will have to sidestep another danger — getting bogged down in a blame game over ongoing anti-government protests in a part of Kashmir held by India.

Violent anti-government protests have swept India-controlled Kashmir for almost a month. The region is under an army lockdown.

WATER

The two countries disagree over use of the water flowing down rivers that rise in Indian Kashmir and run into the Indus river basin in Pakistan.

The use of the water is governed by the 1960 Indus Water Treaty under which India was granted the use of water from three eastern rivers, and Pakistan the use of three western rivers.

Pakistan says India is unfairly diverting water with the upstream construction of barrages and dams. India denies the charge.

SIACHEN

Indian and Pakistani forces have faced off against each other in mountains above the Siachen glacier in the Karakoram range, the world’s highest battlefield, since 1984.

The two sides have been trying to find a solution that would allow them to withdraw troops, but India says it is unwilling to bring its forces down until Pakistan officially authenticates the positions they hold.

Pakistan has said it is willing to do so but on the condition that it is not a final endorsement of India’s claim over the glacier, a source of meltwater for Pakistan’s rivers.

AFGHANISTAN

Afghanistan has become a major source of friction, although Indian and Pakistani differences over Pakistan’s western neighbour have not been a part of their official talks.

The two countries have long competed for influence there and Pakistan is deeply suspicious of a rise in India’s presence after the fall of the Islamabad-backed Taliban government in 2001.

It accuses India of using Afghanistan as a base to create problems inside Pakistan, including backing separatists in its Baluchistan province. India denies the accusations, saying its focus is on development.

This rivalry is complicating U.S.-led efforts to end an intensifying Taliban insurgency and bring stability to Afghanistan more than eight years after the Taliban were ousted. (Compiled by Chris Allbritton and Zeeshan Haider in Islamabad; Editing by Sugita Katyal) (For more coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan, see: here)

Media group urges Syria to drop journalists’ case

(Reuters) – A press freedom group urged Syria to drop criminal defamation charges against two journalists it said could face three years in jail over their reports into alleged corruption at a state fertilizer company.

The Committee to Protect Journalists said Bassam Ali and Suhaila Ismail investigated misuse of funds at the Public Company for Fertilizers in Syria.

The group said that after their reports were published in 2005 and 2006, the minister of industry fired the company director, who then filed a lawsuit against the journalists for defamation and “resisting the socialist system.”

Wednesday an appeal court in Homs, 100 miles north of Damascus, transferred the case to a military court. Under the charge of “resisting the socialist system,” they could face between one and three years in prison.

“We call on the authorities to drop all charges against them, considering that the government itself saw fit to dismiss the head of the company as a result of these articles,” said CPJ Deputy Director Robert Mahoney.

The case against the journalists coincides with Syria’s intensified campaign of arrests of political opponents over the last two years.

Sunday, a military court jailed a 79-year-old lawyer who campaigned for decades to end Syria’s emergency laws, in place since the Baath Party took power in 1963.

Despite the crackdown, Damascus has enjoyed better relations with the West after years of isolation due to disputes over its role in Lebanon and Iraq, and its support for militant groups.

(Editing by Myra MacDonald)

FACTBOX-What are the issues between India and Pakistan?

(Reuters) – The top diplomats of nuclear-armed rivals Pakistan and India hold their second meeting in three months on Thursday in Islamabad amid continuing efforts to normalise relations strained by the Mumbai attacks of 2008.

Here are some of the main problems between the neighbours.

SECURITY

For India, security is the top issue. It has refused to resume a series of talks known as the composite dialogue until Pakistan takes more action against Pakistan-based militant groups.

In particular, India wants Pakistan to show it is serious in reining in the militants behind the Mumbai attacks, in which 166 people were killed.

Pakistan accuses India of backing separatists in its Baluchistan province and providing weapons and funding to Pakistan Taliban groups, charges India denies.

KASHMIR

The mostly Muslim Himalayan region of Kashmir is at the heart of hostility between the neighbours and was the cause of two of their three wars since independence from Britain in 1947 (the third was over the founding of Bangladesh).

Separatists backed by Pakistan began an insurgency against Indian rule in 1989 and since then tens of thousands of people have been killed. Most fighters want Kashmir to become part of Pakistan but many ordinary Kashmiris want independence from both India and Pakistan.

WATER

The two countries disagree over use of the water flowing down rivers which rise in Indian Kashmir and run into the Indus river basin in Pakistan.

The use of the water is governed by the 1960 Indus Water Treaty under which India was granted the use of water from three eastern rivers, and Pakistan the use of three western rivers.

Pakistan says India is unfairly diverting water with the upstream construction of barrages and dams. India denies the charge.

SIACHEN

Indian and Pakistani forces have faced off against each other in mountains above the Siachen glacier in the Karakoram range, in the world’s highest battlefield, since 1984.

The two sides have been trying to find a solution that would allow them to withdraw troops, but India says it is unwilling to bring its forces down until Pakistan officially authenticates the positions they hold.

Pakistan has said it is willing to do so but on the condition that it is not a final endorsement of India’s claim over the glacier, an important source of meltwater for Pakistan’s rivers.

AFGHANISTAN

Afghanistan has become a major source of friction although Indian and Pakistani differences over Pakistan’s western neighbour have not been a part of their official talks.

The two countries have long competed for influence there and Pakistan is deeply suspicious of a rise in India’s presence after the fall of the Islamabad-backed Taliban government in 2001.

It accuses India of using Afghanistan as a base to create problems inside Pakistan, including backing separatists in its Baluchistan province. India denies the accusations, saying its focus is on development.

This rivalry is complicating U.S.-led efforts to end an intensifying Taliban insurgency and bring stability to Afghanistan more than eight years after the Taliban were ousted.

(Compiled by Chris Allbritton and Zeeshan Haider in Islamabad)

EU to raise pressure on Israel over Gaza blockade

(Reuters) – European Union foreign ministers will call on Israel next week to lift a three-year-old blockade of Gaza which they describe as “unacceptable and counterproductive” — including to Israel’s security.

World

In a draft statement prepared for a meeting on Monday, the foreign ministers will condemn the use of violence during Israel’s operation to stop a flotilla of aid ships reaching Gaza in which Israeli forces killed nine Turks.

They will also call for a “credible, impartial and independent” investigation.

The EU also says it is prepared to contribute to a new mechanism for getting goods in and out of Gaza, which would be based on more regular land access and possibly sea crossings to the coastal territory of 1.5 million people.

“The policy of closure is unacceptable and counterproductive, including from the point of view of Israel’s security,” a copy of the draft seen by Reuters reads.

“The EU calls for a change of policy leading to an unfettered flow of humanitarian aid, commercial goods and persons” into Gaza in line with a U.N. resolution.

Israel has maintained a blockade on Gaza since mid-2007, when the Hamas militant movement took full control of the territory from its rival Fatah, a year after winning a parliamentary election.

Israel says the measures are designed to prevent arms being smuggled to Hamas and other militant groups.

CALL FOR POLICY CHANGE

The EU is the biggest supplier of aid to the Palestinian territories, with member states and the executive European Commission providing about 600 million euros ($722.3 million) a year. The EU is pushing to free up trade with the territories.

In an opinion piece published in European papers on Friday, the foreign ministers of France, Italy and Spain said Israel needed to turn its blockade policy on its head by opening the borders and blocking some listed items, rather than completely closing the borders and allowing in only a few goods.

“To guarantee full security of supplies, we propose that inspections supported and funded by the EU should be put in place there in conditions acceptable to all in order to ensure that consignments bound for Gaza contain neither weapons nor explosives,” the three foreign ministers wrote.

“A similar regime could be considered for maritime consignments bound for Gaza, for example, by deploying EU monitoring teams in Cyprus.”

In their statement on Monday, the foreign ministers of all 27 EU countries will reiterate that a two-state solution — a Palestinian state made up of Gaza and the West Bank living side by side with Israel — remains the only long-term solution to the conflict, in which the peace process has stalled.

“The aim is a peace deal within 24 months as agreed by the Quartet (in March),” the draft statement says, referring to the United States, Russia, the EU and the United Nations, who monitor Middle East peace efforts.

“All efforts to achieve Palestinian reconciliation must be accelerated. Comprehensive peace must include a settlement between Israel and Syria and Israel and Lebanon.”

Somali group issues video of French hostage

(Reuters) – An Islamist group in Somalia has issued a video of a French hostage held in the Horn of Africa country, showing him asking France to meet his captors’ demands.

World | France

The video appeared on a website often used by Islamist militant groups around the world, which said the hostage, named as Denis Allex, had issued a “message to the French people.”

A copy of the video issued by U.S.-based SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors militant internet traffic, shows the captive in an orange outfit with armed men standing behind him while he reads a statement in French.

Two French security advisers were kidnapped by the Shabaab rebel group in Somalia last year but one, Marc Aubriere, escaped a month later.

The Islamist group issued a statement of demands in September, which included an immediate end to French support for the Somali government and the withdrawal of African Union peacekeepers.

In the video, Allex repeats those demands and says the group will issue a list of names of prisoners it wants released. He says the defeat of President Nicolas Sarkozy’s party in recent French regional elections showed France opposes his policies.

“We ask the French people to do everything for my liberation,” he says, noting that other hostages have been released in Somalia, Sudan and Algeria.

“You can imagine my state of mind … I miss my family a lot and hope to see them as soon as possible,” he says, adding he has not been mistreated.

The message contains no threat against his life.

“The Shabaab movement made its demands to the government without any response and it is me who is paying the price by remaining in their hands as a hostage for a long time,” he said.

“Even though they have not and they are not physically abusing me, it is severely affecting my mental and psychological health.”

(Reporting by Andrew Hammond; editing by Diana Abdallah)

Somali group issues video of French hostage

DUBAI, June 9 (Reuters) – An Islamist group in Somalia has issued a video of a French hostage held in the Horn of Africa country, showing him asking France to meet his captors’ demands.

The video appeared on a website often used by Islamist militant groups around the world, which said the hostage, named as Denis Allex, had issued a “message to the French people”. A copy of the video issued by U.S.-based SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors militant internet traffic, shows the captive in an orange outfit with armed men standing behind him while he reads a statement in French. Two French security advisers were kidnapped by the Shabaab rebel group in Somalia last year but one, Marc Aubriere, escaped a month later.

The Islamist group issued a statement of demands in September, which included an immediate end to French support for the Somali government and the withdrawal of African Union peacekeepers.

In the video, Allex repeats those demands and says the group will issue a list of names of prisoners it wants released. He says the defeat of President Nicolas Sarkozy’s party in recent French regional elections showed France opposes his policies.

“We ask the French people to do everything for my liberation,” he says, noting that other hostages have been released in Somalia, Sudan and Algeria.

“You can imagine my state of mind … I miss my family a lot and hope to see them as soon as possible,” he says, adding he has not been mistreated.

The message contains no threat against his life.

“The Shabaab movement made its demands to the government without any response and it is me who is paying the price by remaining in their hands as a hostage for a long time,” he said.

“Even though they have not and they are not physically abusing me, it is severely affecting my mental and psychological health.”

(Reporting by Andrew Hammond; editing by Diana Abdallah)

Somali group issues video of French hostage

DUBAI, June 9 (Reuters) – An Islamist group in Somalia has issued a video of a French hostage held in the Horn of Africa country, showing him asking France to meet his captors’ demands.

The video appeared on a website often used by Islamist militant groups around the world, which said the hostage, named as Denis Allex, had issued a “message to the French people”. A copy of the video issued by U.S.-based SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors militant internet traffic, shows the captive in an orange outfit with armed men standing behind him while he reads a statement in French. Two French security advisers were kidnapped by the Shabaab rebel group in Somalia last year but one, Marc Aubriere, escaped a month later.

The Islamist group issued a statement of demands in September, which included an immediate end to French support for the Somali government and the withdrawal of African Union peacekeepers.

In the video, Allex repeats those demands and says the group will issue a list of names of prisoners it wants released. He says the defeat of President Nicolas Sarkozy’s party in recent French regional elections showed France opposes his policies.

“We ask the French people to do everything for my liberation,” he says, noting that other hostages have been released in Somalia, Sudan and Algeria.

“You can imagine my state of mind … I miss my family a lot and hope to see them as soon as possible,” he says, adding he has not been mistreated.

The message contains no threat against his life.

“The Shabaab movement made its demands to the government without any response and it is me who is paying the price by remaining in their hands as a hostage for a long time,” he said.

“Even though they have not and they are not physically abusing me, it is severely affecting my mental and psychological health.”

(Reporting by Andrew Hammond; editing by Diana Abdallah)

Two men with militant ties arrested in NY – report

Two men were arrested late Saturday at John F. Kennedy International Airport where they were believed headed for meetings with militant groups in Somalia, The New Jersey Star Ledger reported.

The men were arrested as they tried to board flights to Egypt. They were charged with conspiring to commit an act of international terrorism through a group tied to al Qaeda, the newspaper said, citing officials familiar with the arrests.

Both in their twenties and both residents of New Jersey, the two men had been under investigation since October 2006, the Star Ledger said.

An unidentified official told the newspaper both men were unmarried American citizens.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office confirmed the arrests but said the pair did not pose any immediate threat. They are scheduled to appear on Monday in U.S. District Court in Newark, New Jersey.

Federal and local law enforcement officials searched the homes of both men where they conducted interviews and removed boxes of papers, a computer and other materials.

Authorities had infiltrated the men’s social circle and said the suspects were not planning an imminent attack in the New York-New Jersey area but were believed to be intending to join with the Al Shabaab youth movement to fight against Americans in Somalia, the report said.

One official briefed on the case was hopeful it would lead to a “web of arrests,” the newspaper said.

The arrests followed a failed attempt to explode a car bomb in New York’s Times Square last month and an incident on Christmas Day in which a 23-year-old Nigerian tried to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner by setting off explosives hidden in his underwear. (Reporting by Chris Michaud; editing by Chris Wilson)

Pakistan must stop supporting terrorism for talks to succeed: Farooq Abdullah

New Delhi, June 4 (ANI): Union Minister for New and Renewable Energy Dr. Farooq Abdullah has asked Pakistan to stop supporting anti-India militant groups if it wants the Indo-Pak dialogue to succeed.

Talking to reporters here on Thursday, Abdullah said: “Controlling terrorist activities by Pakistan would benefit both countries immensely, as militant infiltration is on the rise since the beginning of the year.

“The biggest thing is to stop terrorism first. Only then will any talk with India become successful. Unless terrorism is stopped, all talks will be ineffective,” he added.

He also expressed happiness over the resolution of the Baglihar Dam dispute.

“There was a lot of commotion regarding the Baglihar issue which has been resolved now. They have agreed to Uri project (River projects). The other project, which we are making at Kargil, they have accepted that as well. Gradually, things will become better,” he said.

Members of India- Pakistan Permanent Indus Water Commission recently held talks on issues relating to the distribution of Indus waters, as Pakistan had earlier raised objections to India”s Baglihar and other water storage projects. (ANI)

‘US studying options for a possible Pakistan strike’

Washington, May 29 (IANS) The US military is reviewing options for a unilateral strike in Pakistan in the event that a successful terror attack on American soil is traced to the country’s tribal areas, according to the Washington Post.

Ties between the alleged Times Square bomber, Pakistani-American Faisal Shahzad, and elements of the Pakistani Taliban have sharpened the Obama administration’s need for retaliatory options, the influential daily reported Saturday citing senior military officials.

A US reprisal, however would be contemplated only under extreme circumstances, such as a catastrophic attack that leaves President Barack Obama convinced that the ongoing campaign of CIA drone strikes is insufficient, the unnamed officials stressed.

The US options for potential retaliatory action rely mainly on air and missile strikes, but could also employ small teams of US Special Operations troops already positioned along the border with Afghanistan, the Post said.

Plans for military strikes in Pakistan have been revised significantly over the past several years, moving away from a ‘large, punitive response’ to more measured plans meant to deliver retaliatory blows against specific militant groups, one of the senior military officials was quoted as saying.

The official added that there is a broad consensus in the US military that airstrikes would at best erode the threat posed by Al Qaeda and its affiliates, and risk an irreparable rupture in the US relationship with Pakistan.

At the same time, the administration is trying to deepen ties to Pakistan’s intelligence officials in a bid to head off any attack by militant groups.

The United States and Pakistan have recently established a joint military intelligence centre on the outskirts of the northwestern city of Peshawar, and are in negotiations to set up another one near Quetta, the Pakistani city where the Afghan Taliban is based, the Post said citing US military officials.

US spy agencies have engaged in a major buildup inside Pakistan over the past year. The CIA has increased the pace of drone strikes against Al Qaeda affiliates, a campaign supported by the arrival of new surveillance and eavesdropping technology deployed by the National Security Agency, the Post said.

US studying options for possible Pakistan strike: Post

Washington, May 29 (IANS) The US is studying options of striking Pakistan if a successful terror attack is traced back to that country, The Washington Post reported Saturday.

Ties between the alleged Times Square bomber, Faisal Shahzad, and elements of the Pakistani Taliban have sharpened the Obama administration’s need for retaliatory options, senior defence officials were quoted as saying by the newspaper.

They stressed that a US reprisal would be contemplated only under extreme circumstances, such as a catastrophic attack that leaves President Barack Obama convinced that the ongoing campaign of Central Iintelligence Agency (CIA) drone strikes is insufficient.

‘Planning has been reinvigorated in the wake of Times Square,’ one of the officials told the Post.

At the same time, the administration is trying to deepen ties to Pakistan’s intelligence officials in a bid to head off any attack by militant groups.

The US and Pakistan have recently established a joint military intelligence centre on the outskirts of the northwestern city of Peshawar in Pakistan, and are in negotiations to set up another one near Quetta, the Pakistani city where the Afghan Taliban is based, according to the US military officials.

The ‘fusion centres’ are meant to bolster Pakistani military operations by providing direct access to U.S. intelligence, including real-time video surveillance from drones controlled by the US Special Operations Command, the Post report said.

But in an acknowledgement of the continuing mistrust between the two governments, the officials added that both sides also see the centres as a way to keep a closer eye on one another, as well as to monitor military operations and intelligence activities in insurgent areas.

President Obama said during his campaign for the presidency that he would be willing to order strikes in Pakistan, and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said in a television interview after the Times Square attempt that ‘if, heaven forbid, an attack like this that we can trace back to Pakistan were to have been successful, there would be very severe consequences.’

Obama dispatched his national security adviser, James L. Jones, and CIA Director Leon Panetta to Islamabad this month to deliver a similar message to Pakistani officials, including President Asif Ali Zardari and the military chief, Gen. Ashfaq Kiyani.

Jones and Panetta also presented evidence gathered by U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies that Shahzad received significant support from the Pakistani Taliban.

The US options for potential retaliatory action rely mainly on air and missile strikes, but could also employ small teams of US Special Operations troops already positioned along the border with Afghanistan.

One of the senior military officials said plans for military strikes in Pakistan have been revised significantly over the past several years, moving away from a ‘large, punitive response’ to more measured plans meant to deliver retaliatory blows against specific militant groups.

‘The general feeling is that we need to be circumspect in how we respond so we don’t destroy the relationships we’ve built’ with the Pakistani military, a second official said.

US Special Operations teams in Afghanistan have pushed for years to have wider latitude to carry out raids across the border, arguing that CIA drone strikes do not yield prisoners or other opportunities to gather intelligence.

But a 2008 US helicopter raid against a target in Pakistan prompted protests from officials in Islamabad who oppose allowing American soldiers to operate within their country.

The CIA has the authority to designate and strike targets in Pakistan without case-by-case approval from the White House. U.S. military forces are currently authorized to carry out unilateral strikes in Pakistan only if solid intelligence were to surface on any of three high-value targets: Al Qaeda leaders Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, or Taliban chief Mohammad Omar. But even in those cases, the military would need higher-level approval.

The report quoting a senior US military official said the centres would be used to track the Afghan Taliban leadership council, known as the Quetta shura. But other officials said the main mission would be to support the US military effort across the border in Kandahar, Afghanistan, where a major US military push is planned.

Covert U.S. operations authorized in secret order

A senior U.S. military commander issued a secret order last year that laid the ground for an escalation of covert operations across the Middle East and the Horn Africa, officials said on Monday.

Issued last September by General David Petraeus, the order authorized an escalation that included boosting military and intelligence assistance to help Yemeni forces strike al Qaeda targets, as well as deployment of more unmanned aerial drones to collect information and track high-value targets.

The order also authorized U.S. Special Operations units to work with local security forces to counter al Qaeda and other threats, a goal Pentagon officials have made no secret of.

As the head of the U.S. military’s Central Command, Petraeus oversees U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and plays a major role in planning for any possible military action against Iran over its nuclear program.

The order was first reported by the New York Times, which quoted a document it obtained as saying the goal was to build networks that could “penetrate, disrupt, defeat or destroy” al Qaeda and other militant groups as well as “prepare the environment” for future attacks by U.S. or local military forces.

The newspaper said the directive also appeared to authorize specific operations in Iran, most likely to gather intelligence about its nuclear program or identify dissident groups that might be useful for any future military offensive.

Some of the covert military operations that followed the secret order have been reported. These include a September 2009 attack by helicopter-borne Special Operations Forces on a car carrying one of east Africa’s most wanted al Qaeda militants, Kenyan-born Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan.

Central Command has been positioning Reaper drones at a base in the Horn of Africa. Officials said the drones can be used against militants in Yemen and Somalia, and even against pirates who attack ships traversing the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean.

“They (the drones) are part of it but it is much broader than that,” one U.S. official said of the order.

In February, Defence Secretary Robert Gates authorized $150 million in security assistance for Yemen for fiscal 2010, up from $67 million last year.

Officials told Reuters the money would be used in part to bolster Yemen’s special operations forces to lead an offensive targeting al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which claimed responsibility for a failed plot to blow up a U.S. passenger plane on Christmas Day.

The group has emerged as one of al Qaeda’s most active affiliates, and the Obama administration recently took the extraordinary step of authorizing the CIA to kill a leading figure linked to the group — American-born Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki.

(Reporting by Adam Entous; Editing by Chris Wilson)

Analysts skeptical about S.Arabia religious leaders calling terror financing unIslamic

Amman (Jordan)/Washington, May 20 (ANI): A resolution issued by Saudi Arabia’s top religious leaders that says terror financing is forbidden by Islamic law, will not amount to much, according to skeptical analysts.

The Christian Science Monitor (CSM) quoted the analysts as saying that the resolution passed by the government-appointed Council of Senior Ulema, holds little weight with those inclined to support militants.

Some Saudi Arabians view their government as too eager to please the U.S. in its quest to stop terrorism and question the religious and moral legitimacy of the monarchy.

Saudi officials agree that for some militants or their supporters, this stand against terrorist funding won”t resonate.

“The extremists, for them it wouldn’t make a difference, because they have their own little fatwa mills where they issue fatwas left and right,” claimed Nail Al-Jubeir, a spokesman for the Saudi embassy in Washington.

“They’re going to issue their own fatwas saying it’s the duty of every person to help them, but it doesn’t go anywhere. They’re just talking to their own group of people,” Jubeir added.

Jubeir said the government hopes the ruling will eliminate any misunderstandings about what constitutes support for militant groups and deter people from sending financial support to such organizations.

Among some analysts, there”s a view that the resolution was created to show the West that Saudi Arabia is committed to fighting terrorism, rather than to be an effective counter-terrorism measure in itself.

“This is a political display of opposition to terrorist activities,” says Hilal Khashan, a professor of political science at the American University of Beirut.

“The main threat does not come from officially sanctioned contributions to groups that are regarded as militant and anti-Western. The main threat comes from private donations made by Saudi business people and wealthy individuals and the Saudi statement does not control private donations,” he added.

The council’s resolution has been drawn from the Koran, Sunnah (traditions of the Prophet Mohammed”s life), and Islamic law. (ANI)

Bomb explodes in Greek courthouse

A bomb has exploded at a courthouse in Greece’s second largest city, Thessaloniki, but there were no injuries and only minor damage, police officials said.

The blast came after a similar explosion outside the main prison in the capital Athens late on Thursday which slightly injured two people and damaged dozens of shops and homes.

An unidentified caller warned a Greek TV station and a newspaper that a bomb would explode in the Thessaloniki courthouse, police said.

“There was an explosion in the toilets of the main courthouse in Thessaloniki. There are no reports of injuries so far,” a police official who declined to be named said.

“The explosion was very similar to the one in Athens.”

Bomb attacks by militant groups are frequent in Greece and usually target police, public buildings or businesses.

In March, a 15-year-old boy was killed and his mother and sister were wounded as a bomb exploded outside a building in central Athens, the first deadly bomb attack in years.

Urban violence has increased after the police shooting of a teenager in December 2008, which prompted weeks of riots.

Social unrest is also picking up after Greece took belt-tightening measures, including wage cuts and tax hikes in recent months, aimed at pulling Greece out of a debt crisis.

Iraq blames deadly attacks on Al Qaeda

The continuing political deadlock in Iraq appears to have inspired another mass bombing campaign that has left about 100 people dead and scores more injured.

Militant groups staged a series of explosions and shootings across the country, targeting both security forces and civilians.

The government has blamed militants linked to Al Qaeda.

It is the most deadly attack in Iraq this year and comes two months after an inconclusive election that has still produced no clear winner.

Iraqis had hoped that national elections in March might have brought an end to such bombings.

Security was the number one electoral issue and both sides were promising tougher measures to crack down on insurgents who have staged mass attacks in the past.

But it was not to be. A series of suicide bombings and drive-by shootings ripped through areas of Baghdad and other towns including Mosul and the central city of Hilla, leaving scores dead and many more wounded.

“We are workers who work to earn a living,” said one Iraqi man.

“Why do those people have to be killed like this? Three blasts in Iskandariya, Haswa and Musayyib. Bodies of people were scattered everywhere.”

The violence began with a series of co-ordinated shootings against police and army checkpoints. Two car bombs then exploded outside a textile factory just as workers were preparing to go home for lunch.

As rescue workers and bystanders gathered at the scene, a suicide bomber blew himself up.

“We heard a bomb explosion and we rushed to the site,” said one observer.

“As we were running towards the site, a car bomb went off by a group of people who had been gathering there. Is this acceptable to God?”

Another bomb exploded in a marketplace killing at least 15 people.

All up there were more than 20 attacks across the country.

Only last month the United States and Iraqi officials had claimed victory in killing two of Al Qaeda’s most senior members, but the Iraqi government now fears the extremist group is stepping up its attacks to exploit the political instability.

More than two months after the March 7 elections it is still not clear who will control the next Iraqi government and US Major General Stephen Lanza says government forces were the key target in the bombings.

“The majority of the attacks were directed against the ISF (Iraq security forces), some at checkpoints and some on houses, such as the attacks in Fallujah,” he said.

“We do not have additional details on that yet, but we continue to do our assessment and analysis as the facts continue to develop.”

In recent days, electoral officials have begun ratifying the results from all provinces – except Baghdad, where a recount is still underway.

Former prime minister Iyad Allawi beat the incumbent Iraqi leader by two seats, but neither side has been able to form a government.

Violence has fallen in Iraq in the past two years but these latest attacks show whichever side eventually wins the election will find Al Qaeda is still a deadly force to be reckoned with.

‘Banned’ JeM organising rallies, holding sermons in Karachi mosque: Report

Los Angeles, May 10 (ANI): Despite being banned the Jaish-e-Muhammed (JeM), the terror group with which Faisal Shahzad, the confessed Times Square bomber is said to have close links, is operating freely in Pakistan with its leaders holding rallies and delivering inciting lectures and sermons without any check.

The JeM, which was banned by Pakistan in 2002 under an intense international pressure following the attack on the Indian Parliament in 2001, has made Karachi’s Batha mosque its coordination centre from where it carries on its covert activities.

Several leaders of this hardcore Islamic terrorist group often visit the mosque to deliver sermons, a Los Angeles Times report said.

According to the report, recently hundreds of ‘worshipers’ had gathered to hear the JeM’s ‘jihad’ leader Maulan Masood Azhar in the mosque, where the theme of speeches and sermons often covers the same topic- “holy war against the West.”

Amazingly, police officers were seen providing security for during Azhar’s rally, which clearly summons up the Pakistan government’s efforts against these terror organisations.

Though security officials had put up a metal detectors for people entering the mosque for the rally, there were hardly any restrictions on the speech made by the terror commanders.

“They had metal detectors checking people going in. The people in this mosque, their main focus is jihad,” the newspaper quoted Ali Khan, who runs a barber shop just 50 yards away from the Batha mosque, as saying.

Observers and analysts noted that Karachi was fast becoming a terror coordination centre, where banned militant groups routinely dispatch their cadets.

Raza Hasan, a Karachi based crime reporter of a leading English newspaper, said terror groups often send their recruits to city-based mosques to pass out jihad pamphlets and compact discs among masses to attract young people towards ‘jihad’

“Authorities have not come down hard on Jaish-e-Muhammad or any of these banned outfits. They seem to lack a policy,” Hasan said.

Yusuf Khan, a Karachi based analyst, described the modus operandi of these jihad groups.

“Usually when the government bans these militant groups, they suddenly start welfare work. During the earthquake in Kashmir in 2005, Jaish-e-Muhammad began helping people and rebuilding. That”s their technique: to become philanthropic and get sympathy,” Khan said.

While the US is piling up pressure on Pakistan to crack down on the JeM and the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), another banned terror group which mainly focussed on India in the past, experts are sceptical over any action on these ‘jihadi’ organisations, as they still enjoy support and sympathy of many in the country.

“I”m afraid it will be life as normal. There is a lot of sympathy among many in law enforcement for these people. You cannot wipe this out,” Khan said. (ANI)

One killed, seven injured in Dagestan blast

Moscow, May 8 (IANS/RIA Novosti) At least one person was killed and seven people were injured in a blast that ripped through a railway station in Derbent town in the Russian North Caucasus republic of Dagestan Friday night, a police source said.

‘According to the latest information, the number of wounded increased to seven,’ the source said adding that the number may rise further.

The explosive device was placed in a garbage dumpster near the platform, he said, adding that one of the hospitalised people is a police officer, who sustained grave wounds in the blast.

Russia’s mainly Muslim North Caucasus republics, especially Chechnya, Dagestan and Ingushetia, have seen an upsurge of militant violence lately, with frequent attacks on police and officials.

The Kremlin has pledged to wage ‘a ruthless fight’ against militant groups but also acknowledged a need to tackle unemployment, organised crime, clan rivalry and corruption as causes of the ongoing violence in the region