Abbott sides with big miners over tax

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott says he cannot see how the Coalition could back the Government’s move to put a 40 per cent tax on mining profits.

Mr Abbott has given his strongest indication so far that the Opposition will block the tax after meeting with senior mining executives in Canberra today.

Mr Abbott has been speaking with BHP Billiton executive Marius Kloppers and Rio Tinto Australia managing director David Peever in Canberra as Prime Minister Kevin Rudd held a series of meetings with mining heavyweights in Perth.

The Government’s announcement on Sunday that it would impose a tax on the above-normal profits of mining companies has been met with outrage from the resources sector and has seen mining stocks plunge.

Emerging from today’s meeting, Mr Abbott said he could see “no way” the Coalition could support the tax.

“I reiterate that I can see no good arguments for this great big new tax,” he said.

“It is a very, very bad tax. The only way to avoid it is to ensure there is a change of government at the next election.”

Overnight London-listed shares in BHP Billiton shed nearly 8 per cent and Rio Tinto shares dropped more than 6 per cent.

The Government has accused the mining industry of running a scare campaign and Mr Rudd has indicated he will not budge from the 40 per cent rate.

“It’s inevitable that mining companies are going to complain,” he said.

“We intend through an extended consultation process to work our way through it.

“A whole range of points of view were put [forward today]. We’ll try and work through the detail of that.”

Greens Leader Bob Brown has urged the Government to stick to its guns.

“The mining corporations have far too much say in the running of this country without being representative, they are a massive lobby on both parties in Canberra,” he said.

“They have the Coalition on a string, but this Labor Government, which stands up for average Australians, should stay strong on what is a proper idea.”

‘Heavy-handed’ tax

Mincor Resources managing director David Moore says the tax will have dire consequences for the industry.

“We can only hope and pray that through the consultation process there’s is a sense returned to how this tax is applied, and hopefully the tax goes away altogether,” he said.

Toro Energy managing director Greg Hall says his company may have to reconsider at least one project.

“We’re evaluating our project in Western Australia on the basis of this additional tax regime and determining what that means for us,” he said.

WA Premier Colin Barnett says the tax should be dropped or scaled back.

“This is very heavy-handed,” he said.

Meanwhile, Canadian finance minister Jim Flaherty says the new tax could benefit his country because investors will seek places to invest that have lower taxes.

Federal police asked to probe coal ship oil spill

Australian Federal Police (AFP) have been called in to investigate how a bulk coal ship ran aground on the Great Barrier Reef off central Queensland.

Salvage crews are today expected to start pumping fuel oil off the Shen Neng 1, which ploughed at full speed into Douglas Shoal, east of Rockhampton, last Saturday.

The Chinese-registered ship ruptured a fuel tank and damaged the engine room when it ran aground.

Several tonnes of fuel oil leaked into the ocean but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

About 975 tonnes of oil remain on the stranded ship.

Two response boats are at the site and have inflated booms around the coal carrier to minimise any further spillage.

Around 250 people are on standby in case oil reaches the coast but that is now considered unlikely.

The AFP has been asked to consider mounting a criminal investigation into how the ship ran aground but has not yet confirmed whether it will investigate.

Maritime authorities are already looking into the incident.

Salvage begins

Authorities will today start pumping the remaining oil supply off the ship ahead of attempts to refloat the vessel.

Maritime Safety Queensland (MSQ) spokesman Patrick Quirk says recovery ships are in place to prepare for the pumping operation.

“The bunker barge Larcom and our salvage response vessels managing the boom are in position,” he said.

“The processes are taking place to get the oil moving but as yet they are not pumping any oil.

“It is an involved process to connect the pumps and the hoses and our check lists satisfied.

“We’ll start the process when we’re happy that it’s safe to do so.”

Premier Anna Bligh will also fly over the stricken ship today.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett, Greens Leader Bob Brown and Queensland Transport Minister Rachel Nolan have already flown over Douglas Shoal this week.

It is still not clear when authorities will try to move the ship off the reef.

RSPCA spokesman Michael Beatty says it is looking for volunteers to head to central Queensland should there be a major oil spill.

Mr Beatty says it is only a contingency plan.

“Particularly wildlife carers or people who have experience with wildlife is to go on to our website and register on there – obviously with contact numbers, details of experience and availability – and then we can mobilise those people basically instantly to go up and assist if needed,” he said.

Meanwhile, a maritime law expert doubts the Queensland Government will recover the full cost of salvaging the ship.

The State Government says the ship’s owners will be forced to pay for the full clean-up and salvage costs.

But maritime expert Professor Nick Gaskell has told AM that there is a cap on the amount they will have to pay and there is likely to be a gap between the actual cost and what the owners will have to pay.

“There is a maximum amount calculated according to the size of the ship, and my calculations on the information available to me indicate that the maximum sum for this ship will be in the region of $23.5 million,” he said.

“In exchange for having a no-fault liability, the ship owners are entitled to have a ceiling, a maximum amount of damages for which they’re liable.”

Garrett inspects oil spill ship

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett has flown over the bulk coal ship stranded on the Great Barrier Reef off central Queensland this morning.

Three ships are expected to arrive later today to help transfer the remaining 950 tonnes of oil aboard the Shen Neng 1, which hit Douglas Shoal at full speed east of Rockhampton on Saturday.

The Chinese-registered ship ruptured a fuel tank when it ran aground, spilling more than two tonnes of oil into the ocean, but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Greens Leader Bob Brown and Queensland Transport Minister Rachel Nolan have already flown over Douglas Shoal this week.

Final preparations are being made to transfer oil from the stranded ship.

Maritime Safety Queensland spokesman Patrick Quirk says a number of ships are involved in the recovery operation.

“The bunker barge Larcom left Gladstone in the early hours of this morning,” he said.

“The Pacific Responder is on station. She’s the emergency response vessel.

“We also have some tugs chartered by MSQ carrying oil pollution booms. They’re on site as well in preparation for oil transfer operations tonight or tomorrow.”

Mr Quirk says crews have spent the past few days ensuring the ship is stable.

“We spent a number of days with the salvors and the surveyors on board assessing the vessel’s condition,” he said.

“The first major step of this operation will be to remove the oil from that vessel as far as we possibly can.

“We’ll be aiming to remove as much free oil as we can bearing in mind it will always be on this vessel because of the nature of its damage, some oil and water mixture in some of its tanks.”

Shipping law

The incident has prompted debate over shipping channels, pilotage and monitoring systems.

Queensland Resources Council (QRC) chief executive Michael Roche expects the industry will be consulted if changes are made to shipping in the Great Barrier Reef.

“If the government is contemplating such changes, I’m sure they’ll come knocking and we’re very open to discussing sensible changes,” he said.

“It’s in no-one’s interest to place in jeopardy such a great asset as the Great Barrier Reef.”

Mr Roche says the oil is a bigger environmental concern than the coal on board.

“I think the real fear from these sort of events are from the liquid fuels that power the ships rather than the cargo they’re carrying,” he said.

“I think people with other agendas, anti-coal agendas, are focusing on the fact that this particular ship’s cargo is coal.”

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) chairman Russell Reichelt says some changes would involve going to an international body.

“Should Australia take moves to change the shipping channels and kinds of reporting the ships are needed to do, it will involve consultation with the International Maritime Organisation, and my colleagues at the maritime safety authority are well represented there,” he said.

“They would be the group to take forward any review of where the ships are going in that region.”

A shipping expert says Australia should push for higher standards among cargo ship crews.

Peter Morris, a former federal Labor transport minister, headed an inquiry into shipping safety in the 1990s. He says the competence of crews is in decline internationally.

“Australia has access and is well regarded at the International Maritime Organisation, the agency that covers this area,” he said.

“Matters can be raised there the same as if there was compulsory pilotage for the inner route, which is what the ship was on.”

Tourism body applauds oil spill ship management

The head of the Queensland Tourism Industry Council (QTIC) says he is “greatly encouraged” by the way authorities are handling salvaging the bulk coal ship stranded on the Great Barrier Reef off Rockhampton.

Three ships are expected to arrive today to help transfer the remaining 950 tonnes of oil abroad the Shen Neng 1, which hit Douglas Shoal at full speed, east of Rockhampton, on Saturday.

The Chinese-registered ship ruptured a fuel tank when it ran aground, spilling more than two tonnes of oil into the ocean, but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett will fly over the stranded ship later this morning to check the situation.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Greens Leader Bob Brown and Queensland Transport Minister Rachel Nolan have already flown over Douglas Shoal this week.

Authorities say they are well prepared for any oil leakage when they remove fuel oil from the grounded ship.

Booms will be used to contain any spills.

The incident has prompted debate over shipping channels, pilotage, and the system of monitoring ships.

QTIC spokesman Daniel Gschwind says local, state and federal authorities have done a good job of limiting the damage and keeping people informed.

“We hope that the way this has been managed and the way the damage has been contained is limiting any impact on the tourism industry,” he said.

“I certainly believe that visitor flows will continue.”

Dive tourism fears

But the Association of Marine Park Tourism Operators (AMPTO) says the incident could affect the Great Barrier Reef’s reputation as a dive destination.

AMPTO executive director Col McKenzie says the incident has not interrupted dive trips but it is affecting people’s perceptions.

“People are ringing Cairns operators and have the perception that the grounding and the oil spill is going to affect the industry off Cairns,” he said.

“That’s because people find it very hard to come up with the idea that the Barrier Reef is 2,500 kilometres long.

“But there is a perception that this could damage the reef and we have to be very proactive in making sure people understand just what magnificent natural resource we have off our coast.”

Mr McKenzie says companies should have to pay to transport freight through the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.

He says other industries that use the reef have to contribute to its management.

Mr McKenzie says insurance does not necessarily cover the whole cost of disasters.

“These ships run up and down in there all the time and they contribute absolutely nothing in regard to voyage planning,” he said.

“It saves them a lot of time and therefore money to come inside the Great Barrier Reef, which is why they do it, and yet they contribute nothing as a user of the marine park.”

Garrett to inspect oil spill ship site

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett will check the status of the bulk coal ship stranded on the Great Barrier Reef off central Queensland with a flight over the area this morning.

Three ships are expected to arrive today to help transfer the remaining 950 tonnes of oil aboard the Shen Neng 1, which hit Douglas Shoal at full speed east of Rockhampton on Saturday.

The Chinese-registered ship ruptured a fuel tank when it ran aground, spilling more than two tonnes of oil into the ocean, but that has been dispersed with chemicals.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Greens Leader Bob Brown and Queensland Transport Minister Rachel Nolan have already flown over Douglas Shoal this week.

Authorities say they are well prepared for any leakage when they remove fuel oil from the stricken ship. Booms will be used to contain any spills.

The incident has prompted debate over shipping channels, pilotage and monitoring systems.

The Queensland Government says it has also made preparations on land in case of a spill which could not be contained.

Queensland Transport spokesman Dave Stewart says the risk of fuel leaking from the ship during the process is very low.

“I can say the preparedness – if oil does leave the ship and does move to the beach – is high,” he said.

However, it is expected to be weeks before the ship can be towed off the reef.

‘Ticking time bomb’

The director of the Australian Marine Conservation Society, Darren Kindleysides, says the risk of pollution to the reef will be reduced once the oil is removed.

“As long as the oil stays on the coal carrier it’s like a ticking time-bomb,” he said.

“In terms of reducing the risk to the reef, getting the oil off that vessel as quickly as possible is certainly the way to go.”

However, Mr Kindleysides says that will not be the end of it.

“You’ve still got a ship there grounded, you’re still damaging the habitats in the area and of course you’ve still got all the coal on board,” he said.

But Queensland Resources Council chief executive Michael Roche says the oil is a bigger environmental concern than the coal on board.

“I think the real fear from these sort of events are from the liquid fuels that power the ships rather than the cargo they’re carrying,” he said.

“I think people with other agendas, anti-coal agendas, are focusing on the fact that this particular ship’s cargo is coal.

“The threat to the reef is not the coal, it’s from the oil that all ships carry.”

Reef damage

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) chairman Russell Reichelt says it is likely the coal carrier has caused significant damage to coral.

Mr Reichelt says the ship is essentially excavating the reef and divers will investigate once it is safe.

“The kinds of things our divers will look for will be the anti-fouling paints and anything that might be toxic that’s scraped off the vessel and sitting on the seabed and that’s not uncommon in ship groundings,” he said.

“So we expect there to be some clean-up operations needed after the ship’s removed.”

Nuclear power ‘won’t fuel arms race’

The head of Australia’s nuclear science agency has rejected claims that nuclear power in Australia could lead to nuclear weapons in the region.

Greens Leader Bob Brown has warned that introducing nuclear power would invite the prospect of Australia’s neighbours developing nuclear weapons.

Senator Brown says it is an unnecessary and dangerous option.

“If we go to nuclear power, [we] invite and stimulate, as [Barack] Obama worries about, a nuclear power development amongst our neighbours,” he said.

“And when you go to nuclear power you then have the prospect of nuclear weapons.”

But Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) chairman Ziggy Switkowski says Senator Brown’s logic does not make sense.

“There is no country that has moved from civilian nuclear power to nuclear weapons,” he told the National Press Club.

“The other way round from the period of the Second World War, yes, there are examples, but none that starts with civilian power. The path to nuclear weapons from there is very, very difficult, so it’s not going to happen.”

Dr Switkowski predicts the majority of Australians will support nuclear power within the next three years as it is crucial to a successful clean energy strategy.

He says public opinion is shifting and he expects whichever party is in government next term to consider nuclear energy.

“There will come a time in the next two or three years when we all realise that the challenge of moving to clean energy and delivering on these very ambitious greenhouse reduction targets is overwhelming, and we don’t have the technologies reliably available to us other than nuclear power,” he said.

Dr Switkowski also defended the safety record of nuclear power, saying it has not been bettered by any other industry.

He says any insurance company would conclude that a nuclear reactor is not a safety risk.

“The 59 reactors in France are found adjacent to villages, in the middle of vineyards, alongside cathedrals,” he said.

“They are actually remarkably safe.

“If you are ever in a stressed social situation – earthquake, typhoon, cyclone – run to the nuclear power station. They are designed better than anything else we have out there.”

Senate rejects motion on political advertising

The Greens have failed in their bid for the Senate to push for a new political advertising regulator.

The Greens leader Bob Brown tried to move a motion calling on the Government to set up a “Truth in Political Advertising Unit” before the next federal election.

Senator Brown criticised the Government and Opposition for not supporting the bid to amend the Commonwealth Electoral Act.

“When you vote down motions [on this topic] you are manifestly supporting lying, fraudulent behaviour and corruption of the political process. You cannot have it both ways,” he said.

“These are strong words but they need to be issued and the challenge needs to be issued in this Parliament.

“It is disgraceful behaviour by the big parties.”

Tuckey told to apologise for Aboriginal remarks

The Greens say Federal Liberal backbencher Wilson Tuckey should be kicked out of his party if he does not apologise for comments he made about Aboriginal people.

Mr Tuckey says acknowledging traditional owners of land at official functions is a farce and should not be done.

“I have never thanked anyone for the right to be on the soil that is Australian,” he said.

He also says some performers of welcome-to-country ceremonies are “grossly overweight”.

Greens leader Bob Brown says Mr Tuckey should apologise.

“If Wilson Tuckey does not have the common sense or grace or decency to withdraw, he should be removed from the Liberal Party,” Senator Brown said.

“They should not be harbouring somebody who’s capable of making such obnoxious statements.

“[Opposition Leader] Tony Abbott should demand an apology from Wilson Tuckey.”

But Liberal frontbencher Peter Dutton says Mr Tuckey has a right to speak his mind even if people disagree with the comments.

“I don’t have any issue with what Wilson said frankly or his right to say it.”

Mr Abbott believes acknowledging Indigenous ownership as a matter of course is tokenistic and that it should only be done at suitable events.

Resignation offer

Meanwhile, Mr Dutton says he offered to resign over his decision not to participate in the apology to the Stolen Generations.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd made the apology in early 2008.

Mr Dutton was the only Liberal frontbencher not to attend the speech because he did not think it would improve the living conditions for Aboriginal people.

He says he realised at the time that his decision would be hard for the then opposition leader, Brendan Nelson.

“I offered my resignation to Brendan Nelson,” he said.

“What I said to him was exactly what I said before – if legislation comes through, regardless of cost, if there’s a benefit that’s going to be provided to lifting people out of poverty to changing the future for a generation, then I would do that.”

Opposition backs call for population inquiry

The Federal Opposition is supporting a call by the Greens for an independent national inquiry into Australia’s population target.

The population is projected to reach 36 million by 2050 but the Greens say the nation cannot sustain that many people.

The Opposition’s immigration spokesman, Scott Morrison, says there should be an inquiry into how many people the nation can support.

“It’s about what the carrying capacity is,” he said. “We need to get that perspective from regional areas as well as metropolitan areas, where issues of congestion and housing affordability are major problems as well as public transport.

“What’s more important, is the process for planning. For example, the states and territories have no input into questions of immigration and migration intakes but they’re the ones at the end of the day that have to service the needs that are created by it.”

On Sunday, Greens Leader Bob Brown said he was writing to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd this week to ask him to set up an inquiry into the issue.

“So that politicians do have an idea of the carrying capacity of this country, its infrastructure, its ability to deal with those quite worrying projections of 35 million people by 2050,” he said.

“We’ve got to do better than just say well let it happen.”