California SC bans ISKCON from soliciting at Los Angeles airport

Washington, Mar. 26 (ANI): In a massive blow to the Hare Krishna group or ISKCON, the California Supreme Court has upheld a Los Angeles International Airport ordinance barring solicitation inside its airport terminals.

This ruling has come as the final defeat in a 13-year legal fight by the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) to secure the right to solicit inside the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) under the First Amendment.

“It’s pretty conclusive, and it doesn’t look like there are any loopholes. As far as I can tell, it’s over,” the Christian Science Monitor quoted ISKCON”” lawyer David Liberman, as saying.

In 1992, ISKCON had filed a suit against New York City airports claiming that a ban on solicitation in terminals violated their First Amendment right to free speech.

After winning in the district court and losing in the circuit court, ISKCON lost its case in the US Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 that the city’s prohibition was constitutional because an airport terminal is not a “public forum.”

The Chief Justice further wrote that for the majority, solicitation is disruptive in crowded, busy spaces and negatively affects business there.

In 1999, ISKCON brought a suit against Miami International Airport for its ban on solicitation and the selling of literature anywhere in the vicinity of the airport.

The federal district court and appeals court ruled against ISKCON, and the Supreme Court declined to hear the decision, leaving the Miami International Airport’s restriction – and similar restrictions across Florida, Alabama, and Georgia – intact and legal.

The group again filed a suit in California, and a federal judge ruled in their favor.

But being denied the right to solicit at airport terminals, ISKCON may still distribute literature in California and at some other states at airport terminals. (ANI)

Legendary ‘voice of boxing’ commentator Harry Carpenter dies aged 84

London, Mar 23(ANI): Former BBC boxing commentator Harry Carpenter has died at the King’s College Hospital, London, following a prolonged illness.

The 84-year-old, dubbed the Voice of Boxing, died in the early hours of Saturday.

Carpenter’s lawyer David Wills said that the legend had been unwell since last summer, when he had a minor heart attack.

“The funeral has not been arranged, but will be a family funeral, to be followed by a memorial service in London,” The Sun quoted Wills, as saying.

Carpenter had joined the corporation in 1949 and worked for almost half a century before retiring in 1994.

He was presenter of programmes such as Sportsnight (1975–1985), Grandstand and Sports Personality of the Year. He also anchored coverage of Wimbledon from 1967 until 1993.

His rapport with British boxing great Frank Bruno was well known.

Bruno’s agent said that the former heavyweight champion was “very upset” at the news.

“He [Carpenter] was obviously part of Frank”s up-and-coming career from the early days when Harry used to commentate, particularly at the Royal Albert Hall, on Frank”s boxing,” the agent said.

“Frank has many acquaintances, but not many real friends. Harry Carpenter was a friend,” the agent added. (ANI)

‘Berlusconi will have to resign if immunity law overturned’

Rome, Sep. 18 (ANI): Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi would be forced to resign if laws providing him immunity are overturned by the Constitutional Court next month, his lawyers have admitted.

“If the Constitutional Court, which begins its deliberations on October 6, overturns the law there would be damage to the functions of an elected official, which could not be carried out”, Times Online quoted Glauco Nori, a state lawyer for the prime minister’s office, as saying.

The move could cause “irreparable damage” and lead to the Prime Minister’s resignation, he added.

After coming to power for the third time in 2008, Berlusconi pushed the law through Parliament, which gives immunity to the offices of Prime Minister, President and the Speakers of both houses of parliament from court trials, which was dubbed

As being “tailor-made” to shield Berlusconi from corruption charges, by the opposition, the report said.

At the time when legislation was passed, Berlusconi was being prosecuted for allegedly giving a 600,000-dollar bribe to British lawyer David Mills to provide false testimony on his behalf in corruption trials in the 1990s, it added.

Berlusconi’s trial was suspended but Mills was sentenced to 41/2 years in jail.

According to the report, the Milan prosecutor’s office had recently submitted its own memorandum to the court, challenging the immunity law as violating the principle that all citizens are equal before the law.

If the immunity law is struck off next month, corruption charges against Berlusconi are likely to be revived.

According to reports, magistrates in Milan and Palermo are also investigating Berlusconi’s suspected links to the Mafia in the 1990s. (ANI)

Justice Department memos prove US did not torture

Washington, Apr.18 (ANI): A high-profile attorney has claimed that the declassified Department of Justice memos detailing interrogation techniques prove the U.S. did not torture, even as the ACLU and some lawmakers claim the memos are proof positive the Bush administration did.

Constitutional lawyer David Rivkin said: “This data is analyzed in great detail to establish that the use of these techniques does not inflict either physical or psychological damage.”

“The conclusions (the) memos reach — that the specific interrogation techniques used by the CIA did not constitute torture — are eminently reasonable,” he added.

Fox News ,however, quoted Jerrold Nadler, the chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, as saying that four memos, without a shadow of a doubt, authorized torture and gave explicit instruction on how to carry it out, all the while carefully attempting to maintain a legal fig leaf.”

The memos, written between 2002 and 2005, concluded that the interrogation techniques listed in them did not violate anti-torture laws

One May 2005 memo detailed 12 techniques and concluded that none of them constituted torture, while describing how they would result in minimal damage to a detainee.

On dietary manipulation, through which suspects are fed liquid diets, the memo said all detainees would be weighed weekly — and the restricted diet would be ceased if a detainee loses more than 10 percent of his body weight. On “walling,” through which a suspect is slammed into a “flexible, false wall,” the memo said the technique is not intended to “inflict any injury or cause severe pain.”

Other methods included slapping and placing a prisoner in “stress positions”.

Rivkin argues that the documents were “well-written” and featured “careful and nuanced legal analysis.” (ANI)

US sergeant to be tried for murder in Iraq

VILSECK, GERMANY: US Master Sergeant John E Hatley faces court martial on Monday on murder charges for what a prosecutor termed “execution-style”
shootings of prisoners in Iraq.

Hatley, 40, is charged with premeditated murder, conspiracy to commit premeditated murder and obstruction of justice, according to an army statement.

He is the most senior of three US non-commissioned officers to be tried for killing four detainees who prosecutors and co-defendents have said were bound, blindfolded and shot in the head.

The murders were allegedly committed in March or April 2007 in or near southwest Baghdad. An exact date and location have not been determined and the bodies, which witnesses said were dumped into a canal, have never been found.

Two other soldiers — Sergeant Michael Leahy, a medic, and Sergeant First Class Joseph P. Mayo — have been convicted and sentenced to life and 35 years in prison, respectively, with the possibility of parole.

Army Captain John Riesenberg, the prosecutor at Mayo’s trial, charged the prisoners had been shot in the back of the head “execution style.”

But Hatley’s lawyer David Court told AFP last week his client would plead not guilty and added: “The government has no evidence, they just have witness testimony.”

According to testimony from Mayo’s trial, at which he pleaded guilty, all three sergeants shot the detainees with nine-millimetre pistols.

Mayo, 27, told the court he had wondered if it was “the right thing” to do but nonetheless fired because “I just wanted to take care of my soldiers.”

The prisoners had been seized with assault rifles and a duffel bag full of ammunition, Mayo testified, and two sniper rifles were found nearby.

The US unit, which belonged to the 1st Battalion, 18th Infantry Regiment, was still coming to terms with a fatal sniper attack on another sergeant a few weeks earlier.

Mayo testified that Hatley, who led the patrol, had not forced either himself or Leahy to fire.

They were stationed at a combat outpost in West Rashid, one of the most violent Baghdad neighbourhoods at the time, and subjected to repeated attacks.

Rules of engagement often meant setting prisoners free however, which bred “frustration and fear” according to a witness at Mayo’s trial.

Hatley now serves with the 172nd Infantry Brigade in southern Germany, and is to face trial at the Rose Barracks Courthouse, near the town of Vilseck.

US soldier from Iraq faces court martial

A US sergeant is to face a court martial on Monday on murder charges over four Iraqi detainees who prosecutors and co-defendants say were bound, blindfolded and shot in the head.

Master Sergeant John E Hatley, 40, is charged with premeditated murder, conspiracy to commit premeditated murder and obstruction of justice, according to an army statement.

The charges are related to the killings of prisoners in March or April 2007 near Baghdad. An exact date has not been established and the bodies, which witnesses have said were pushed into a canal, were never found.

Two other non-commissioned officers — Sergeant Michael Leahy, a medic, and Sergeant First Class Joseph Mayo – have been found guilty of taking part in the killings and sentenced to life and 35 years in prison, respectively.

Both are eventually eligible for parole.

Hatley’s lawyer David Court had said last week that his client would plead not guilty to the “unusual allegation of pre-meditated murder,” and added, “The government has no evidence, they just have witness testimony.”

According to testimony from Mayo’s trial, at which he pleaded guilty, all three sergeants shot the prisoners in the back of the head with nine-milimetre pistols.