(Reuters) – Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble rejected criticism that Germany was endangering economic recovery with austerity measures, saying the government had a “well-conceived” exit strategy from its stimulus spending.
In a guest column for the Handelsblatt newspaper on Thursday, Schaeuble said he could not understand criticism from abroad that Germany was “wrecking the recovery with austerity measures” because Berlin was doing a lot to stimulate growth.
“There is an implicit accusation that we’re not living up to our international responsibilities as far as economic policies are concerned,” Schaeuble wrote in a contribution for the business daily ahead of the G20 summit this weekend in Toronto.
“I cannot understand this argument because Germany has taken sweeping measures since 2008 to stabilize the economy. We’ve done that on top of all the automatic stabilizers we have (such as higher social welfare spending) that play a much smaller role in countries from which we’re now being criticized.”
Germany recently announced plans for 80 billion euros in budget cuts over the next four years, a package it hopes will bring the structural deficit of Europe’s biggest economy within European Union limits by 2013.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and top White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers wrote in a Wall Street Journal piece on Tuesday that G20 peers should not risk undermining growth for the sake of cutting deficits, echoing a similar call from President Barack Obama.
‘WELL-CONCEIVED EXIT STRATEGY’
Schaeuble pointed to Germany’s budget deficit climbing to five percent of gross domestic product (GDP) as evidence of its commitment to growth-boosting measures.
“It’s true that an abrupt and ill-conceived exit from the stabilization measures could endanger their success,” he said. “But a credit-financed stimulation of demand cannot become a permanent, drug-like fix.
“We need a well-conceived exit strategy. The German government has one. The first consolidation measures won’t take effect until 2011 and amount to less than 0.5 percent of GDP. There’s no way that can be called hitting the brakes.”
Germany, Europe’s largest economy, has vigorously defended its plans to pursue the 80 billion euro savings measures euros in the next four years after Obama preached patience in clamping down on public spending.
On Thursday, Chancellor Angela Merkel dismissed criticism in a separate interview with ARD TV that Germany was not doing enough to stimulate its economy.
Merkel said she had told Obama in a phone call that Germany had done much to support economic growth with stimulus measures.
“Germany is doing much more in 2010 for the worldwide economic recovery than (other countries) on average,” she said.
(Writing by Erik Kirschbaum; editing by Mike Peacock)
UPDATE 1-Geithner: System health linked to bank paybacks-WSJ
adds interview comments, Treasury comments on stock swaps)
WASHINGTON, April 20 (Reuters) – U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said he would consider the health of the financial system and the flow of credit in deciding whether banks can repay bailout funds from the government, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.
In an interview published on its website, the newspaper said Geithner indicated the health of individual banks would not be the sole criterion for returning government funds.
“We want to make sure that the financial system is not just stable, but also not inducing a deeper contraction in economic activity. We want to have enough capital that it’s going to be able to support recovery,” Geithner told the Journal.
Some large banks, including Goldman Sachs Group (GS.N) and J.P. Morgan Chase and Co (JPM.N) have said they want to repay the government, but some fear that this would highlight difficulties at institutions that are deemed by financial regulator stress tests as needing more capital.
Geithner’s comments echoed those of some other Obama administration officials, including White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers, who said on Sunday the administration wants banks to repay funds that came from taxpayers, but not in ways “that will put themselves right back in trouble and leaving themselves with adequate capital.”
Geither told the Journal he has tried to make a simple case to lawmakers and others why taxpayer funds were needed to aid the financial system.
“You can’t have economic recovery without a financial system,” Geithner told the Journal. “Without a financial system you have no credit, which means higher unemployment, lower production capacity and a higher number of failing institutions.”
Geithner also said he would reiterate the need for a “strong and broad global consensus on stimulus, financial repair and quick deployment of resources to emerging economies” later this week when Group of Seven finance ministers meet in Washington.
EQUITY CONVERSIONS AN OPTION
Also on Monday, a Treasury spokesperson said converting the government’s existing preferred stock investments in banks to common equity was being considered as one of several options that would enable the U.S. Treasury to shore up bank balance sheets after the stress test results are disclosed May 4. However, the spokesperson added no decisions have been made.
Other options include encouraging banks to raise private capital, purchasing new preferred shares in them that are convertible into common equity, and asking them to sell troubled assets into a new public-private partnership program.
“We have not endorsed one option over another, all of the those options have been on the table from the beginning and the needs of each bank will determine what the best approach is for each bank,” the spokesperson said.
Conversion of preferred shares to common equity could increase a bank’s capital cushion without using new taxpayer cash, amid dwindling resources from the $700 billion U.S. financial bailout fund.
This was a key part of the latest rescue package for Citigroup (C.N) in February, in which the government agreed to convert up to $25 billion in preferred shares to common stock. The move increased tangible common equity, which bank regulators see as the strongest form of capital — effectively the cushion left after all creditors and preferred shareholders have been paid off.
However, such moves would increase repayment and dilution risks for taxpayers, subordinating them to the same status as other common shareholders. (Reporting by David Lawder, Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)