Jayalalithaa looses plea to quash disproportionate assets case

New Delhi, May 11 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a petition filed by former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa urging it to quash the proceedings initiated by the Special Court against her in disproportionate assets case.

A bench comprising Justices B Sudershan Reddy and S S Nijjar dismissed her plea that the Karnataka High Court had erred, while holding that the trial court order taking congnisance of the complaint on June 5, 1997, did not suffer from any illegality or irregularity.

Earlier on March 19, the apex court had ordered the resumption of Jayalalithaa”s trial in the fourteen-year-old corruption case.

She had approached the apex court challenging the March 10 verdict of the Karnataka High Court.

In her lawsuit, Jayalalithaa contended the March 10 High Court order had glossed over the fact that the charge sheet against her was not able to make out any case against her.

The High Court had rejected Jayalalithaa”s plea for quashing a 1997 order of a Chennai trial court, which took cognisance of Tamil Nadu Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption”s complaint that she amassed wealth disproportionate to her known sources of income during that period.

The High Court had said Jayalalithaa was ”ably represented by eminent lawyers” and had participated in the trial of the case during which 200 witnesses were examined and cross-examined over a 13-year period.

“It is not open for her now to seek quashing of the proceedings on the premise that the order taking cognisance of the offence passed on 5th June, 1997, is a nullity and is not in accordance with law,” it had said in the order.

Jayalalithaa is accused of amassing Rs.66.65 crore between 1991 and 1996 when she was the chief minister. (ANI)

Tainted godman resigns as ”Dhyanapeetam Ashram” head

Bangalore, Mar 30 (ANI): Self-proclaimed godman Swami Nityananda, who was reportedly under the scanner ever since a video of him in a compromising position with Tamil actress Ranjitha surfaced, on Tuesday announced his decision to step down as the chief of the ”Dhyanapeetam Ashram” and all other trusts associated with it.

Addressing his followers on his official website, Nityananda said, “I have decided to live a life of spiritual seclusion, for some indefinite time and to enable the Dhyanapeetam to function with such amended agenda as may be necessary.”

“I am resigning as the head of the Dhyanapeetam and from all the trusts associated with it,” he added.

Swami Nityananda, who is facing criminal cases including that of rape further said, “In view of the developments in the last three weeks following the media reports about me as the head of Dhyanapeetam, I had met some of the leading acharyas of Hindu Dharma at Haridwar Kumbh Mela,” adding that he had briefed them about the truth.

“Candidly discussing what had happened, I had sought their spiritual and moral support, guidance for me, and their views on the future course of Dhyanapeetam. I had also undertaken that I would act entirely in accordance with their counsel,” he claimed.

The Karnataka High Court has turned down the godman”s bail plea for anticipatory bail.

The court had on March 24 ordered the state police to produce all documents relating to the cases filed against Swami Nithyananda, who is facing allegations of involvement in a sex scandal.

Following a petition by the swami seeking to quash the cases, justice Arali Nagaraj issued a notice to the Bidadi police, directing them to produce all documents and records concerning the various criminal cases, including rape, registered against the godman.

The swami had filed a writ petition in the high court, challenging the first information report (FIR) registered against him by the Bidadi police. Besides asking the court to quash the FIR, he had also sought a stay on all the other proceedings against him. Nithyananda had contended that as per the provisions of the law, only the sufferers could file complaints, and not a third party.

The petition contended that Karuppa Lenin, a former disciple and driver of the swami, had conspired to defame the religious institution by levelling charges against him.

The Chennai police had lodged various cases against the godman, including rape, under the Indian Penal Code after Lenin filed a complaint against him on March 3. The Ramanagaram police had, in turn, handed over the case to the CID.

In his petition, Nithyanananda submitted that prima facie, no complaint had been filed by any victim or aggrieved person and Lenin”s complaint was governed by an ulterior motive. It was unfortunate that an act aimed at assassinating the character of the swami had been glorified by the media, it added. (ANI)

Sex video of Swami Nityananda with another Tamil film actress emerges

Kuala Lumpur, Mar 25 (ANI): A new sex video involving spiritual leader Swami Nityananda and another Tamil film actress, Yuvarani, has reportedly surfaced on the Internet.

According to the Tamil Nesan, the spiritual leader is currently missing after his sleazy acts with South Indian actress Ranjitha were televised by a private TV channel about two weeks ago, reports Star Online.

TV channels cannot broadcast the current video owing to a Karnataka High Court order prohibiting the airing of any sleazy video of the swami.

Yuvarani has filed a petition with the Chennai police commissioner requesting that the video be removed from the Internet.

She has denied having any sexual relationship with the swami but admitted to having met him with her two children. (ANI)

Trial against Jayalalithaa temporarily halted

New Delhi, March 16 (IANS) The Supreme Court Tuesday temporarily halted the ongoing trial of former Tamil Nadu chief minister J. Jayalalithaa in a 14-year-old corruption case of amassing wealth far exceeding her legal income.

A bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan halted the trial while deciding to hear on March 19 a lawsuit of the AIADMK chief, challenging the March 10 ruling of the Karnataka High Court that endorsed the June 5, 1997, order of the trial court taking cognisance of a complaint against her.

Following the high court’s order, a Banaglore court, where her trial was shifted in November 2003 by the apex court on a lawsuit by DMK general secretary K. Anbazhagany, was to begin day-to-day cross examination of prosecution witnesses against her from March 18.

But the bench, which also included Justice Deepak Verma and Justice B.S. Chauhan, accepting Jayalalithaa’s counsel Mukul Rohatgi’s plea that the trial court should defer its proceedings till the hearing by the apex court, halted the trial temporarily.

The bench asked the prosecution to ensure that the examination of witnesses does not begin March 18 and inform the trial court that the apex court has listed the AIADMK supremo’s appeal for hearing on March 19.

The apex court earlier had transferred the cases out of Tamil Nadu on Anbazhagan’s contention that a fair trial in the two cases against her was not possible when she was heading the state government.

In her lawsuit, Jayalalithaa contended that the March 10 order of the high court has glossed over the fact that the charge sheet against her was not able to make out any case against her.

Her lawsuit said the special judge, Chennai, had taken cognizance of the June 1997 charge sheet against her ‘mechanically without applying his mind’.

Jayalalithaa is accused of amassing Rs.66.65 crore between 1991 and 1996 when she was the chief minister.

–Indo-Asian news Service

Himachal HC judges to make public their assets

Shimla, Aug 30 (ANI): The judges of the Himachal Pradesh High Court also decided to make their property public, on the lines of Supreme court justices.

Earlier, the judges of Kerala and Delhi high court had announced their decision to make their assets public.

“A decision to declare assets has been taken unanimously by all the nine judges, including acting Chief Justice R.B.Mishra, after the apex court judges’ resolve to make public their assets,” V.K. Sharma, Registrar General of the High Court, said.

Sharma informed that the details of the assets of the judges would be put up on the high court’s website at the earliest.

He added, “We are awaiting the guidelines that have been finalised by the apex court in this regard. As soon as we get these, the list of assets of the judges would be put on the High Court website.”

The Himachal Pradesh High Court had adopted a resolution in 2008 that all judges should declare assets and investments in their name or in the name of their spouse.

Earlier on Wednesday, a meeting of the Justices of the Supreme Court chaired by Chief Justice K.G.Balakrishnan decided to make public the details of their assets.

The issue of disclosing of assets by judges caused a major debate after an article written by Justice Shylendra Kumar of the Karnataka High Court. (ANI)

I have the right to speak on the judiciary: CJI

New Delhi, Aug 24 (ANI): Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan on Monday called the Karnataka High Court Judge D.V. Shylendra Kumar’s move to declare his own assets as a publicity strategy, and reiterated his right to speak on matters related to the judiciary.

“He wants publicity and such a thing is not good for a judge. Judges should not be publicity-crazy,” Chief Justice Balakrishnan said.

The Chief Justice of India refuted charges that he was against judges making their assets public.

“The public has a right to know what is happening in the judiciary and I am telling them. I stand by what I have said on disclosure of assets by judges, and No one can stop them (Judges) if they chose to do so,” he said.

Earlier, Justice Kumar had said the chief justice of India did not have the authority to speak on behalf of all judges.

“I have the authority to speak in favour of judiciary,” Balakrishnan said.

Earlier senior lawyer Harish Salve said, while he agreed with Justice Kumar’s view that judges should publicly declare their assets, his criticism of the Chief Justice was not in order.(ANI)

Thiruvalluvar statue unveiled in Bangalore amidst tight security

Bangalore, Aug 9 (ANI): The statue of Tamil saint- poet Thiruvalluvar was unveiled on Sunday in Bangalore amidst tight security, bringing to an end of 18-year-old dispute.

Both Tamil Nadu and Karnataka Governments expect the installation of the statue to normalize relations between the two feuding states.

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.Karunanidhi unveiled the statue at the Ulsoor Lake Park in the presence of Karnataka Chief Minister B.S.Yeddyurappa.

In a reciprocal gesture, Tamil Nadu Government will unveil the statue of 16-century Kannada poet Sarvajna in Chennai on August 13.

Speaking at the ceremony Yeddyurappa said, “I have cleared everything. The question of a bandh does not arise. People are going to support in the entire state. We are continuing with the programme of unveiling the statues of Thiruvalluvar and Sarvajna.”

Bangaloreans did not respond to the shutdown call given by pro-Kannada outfits who have expressed unhappiness over the unveiling of the statute.

Earlier, the Karnataka High Court had issued an order warning against calling for a shutdown or indulging in acts of violence by any organisation.

The dispute has a long history, The Karnataka Tamil Sangam had wanted to install the statue of Thiruvalluvar since 1968, and accordingly had placed request before every Chief Minister who had ruled the state till 1991.

In 1991, then Chief Minister S.Bangarappa and his cabinet colleague K.J. George took a special interest and allotted land near the Ulsoor Lake. Sangam installed the statue, but some pro-Kannada organizations succeeded in obtaining a stay on the unveiling from the Karnataka High Court.

Sangam appealed against the ruling and the High Court transferred the case to a Civil Court and the matter was pending for the last 18 years.

After assuming power, Yeddyurappa convinced the Sangam authorities to withdraw the case and announced the unveiling of statue and as a reciprocal gesture Karunanidhi announced the unveiling of the Sarvajna statue in Chennai. (ANI)

Women can serve alcohol: Karnataka High Court

Women can serve alcohol: Karnataka High CourtBangalore, Sept 24 : The Karnataka High Court in a land mark judgment gave ruling which allowed the employment of women at places that serve alcohol here today.

The ruling also quashes the existing “Karnataka Excise Act 1965”, which prohibits women from working at such places including pubs, dance bars and live bands, where liquor is served.

The High Court while announcing its verdict also referred to a similar judgment by the Supreme Court last year, which permitted women to be employed as bar tenders provided their security was ensured.

While talking to media, Advocate for the live band association, bar girls association A. N. Ramesh said the High Court today quashed the Karnataka Excise Act 1965 and allowed women to serve liquor in bars.

Karnataka live band association’s secretary Sanjay Kochar who fought the case said this judgment would provide more employment to women in Karnataka.

The Karnataka high court Judge Justice Shailendra Kumar delivered this judgment putting an end to a long controversy. (ANI)